HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 12/13/2012 -i U.
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE DEC 1 3 2012
Bye Acct Oot,
STATE OF OREGON ) / DP 0
ss. "
County of Lane )
I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows:
1. I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning Division of the
Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon.
2. I state that in my capacity as, Program Technician, I prepared and
caused to be mailed copies of TYP112-tn26 A/B&?.t 0, batr xc".�-te,
(See attachment "A") on 10t/1., , 2012 addressed to (see
Attachment "B"), by causing said letters to be placed in a U.S.mail box i °
with postage fully prepaid thereon. cam,
katte„,,_ orail_atA-
.Karen LaFleur
STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane
December Pm, , 2012. Personally appeared the above named Karen
LaFleur, Program Technician, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to
be their voluntary act Before me:
c4A _ i —
/ 1
„fit..,, OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission Expires: 1 ala(n' 1 Cj
-.,R MISTY DAWN BRITTON
`�`"; NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON
"' COt!MISS!ON NO. 461485
MT CO" " '• '`0'I'S DECEM8E0.11,flU
Date Received: ' k t / 2i
Planner: LM
• awaNOFInD
Notice of Decision - Site Plan Modification - Minor, Type I 61, •
Project Name: Buffalo Wild Wings Grill and Bar
•
Project Proposal: New Buffalo Wild Wings Restaurant and Bar at Gateway Mall to replace
the former Hollywood Video building.
Case Number Typ 112-00036
Project Location: The property is located at 2770 Gateway Street, Assessor's Map 17-03-22-
00; Tax Lot 2300
Zoning: Community Commercial
Applicable Refinement Plan and Designation: Gateway Refinement Plan
Metro Plan Designation: Commercial
Application Submitted Date: November 13, 2012
Decision Issued Date: December 13, 2012
Recommendation: Approval, with Conditions
Associated Applications: Jo. No. 93-11-180 (Site Plan Review— Hollywood Video)
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REVIEW TEAM
POSITION REVIEW OF • NAME PHONE
Planner I Land Use Planning Liz Miller (541)726-2301
Public Works Engineering Sanitary & Storm Sewer, Clayton (541)736-1036
Utilities& Easements McEachern
Deputy Fire Marshall Fire and Life Safety Gilbert (541)726-2293
Gordon
•
Plans Examiner - Building Chris (541)744-4153-
Carpenter
APPLICANT APPLICANT'S PROPERTY OWNER
REPRESENTATIVE
Terry Novak Dan Allen GGP Gateway Mall Partners LLC
Novak Architecture, Inc. DLA Construction Services 1 1 14 Avenue of the Americas
6975 SW Sandburg Street, Ste. 320 1307 Columbia Street New York, New York 10036
Portland, OR 97223 Vancouver, WA 98660
•
DECISION: Tentative Site Plan Modification Approval, with conditions, as of the
date of this letter.
•
2'
Date Received: 3 t
Planner: LM
Site Plan Modification TYP 112-00036
•
P i
(745!;1,>7?..., --t-ii,..., �y r avrRPc
_ �.. n ., s 1 ia cnfiyaa �� 4 z
.1 4, "* f .. - 'o-i' .�xyyir +€y`01' if Y t f ili i a1 X10
x 3 p,.v r Sf1T Rbb� 1 ML S`i"sA^ i �� ./ i'xrn.�e'� w 3r f Vt` 1�'S r
3,KS` x iE t .. 5','t� 'xy h(`':"'titi:1;4 ,11$1.- 'llpp,4;.6.0' 4r -` +h•-47j. i
al _ I .. .. �' 1,.. . M.ais`'t/v1�\i-vit k t Lx,. '� as d� y
>p # 1 W .r� �c444i;w .+< Firdt ?� y`AJ , 4 rtt -.:
,f. i + , e.: • :I �1a1 ^.4a n 4C�faskiet 7 >n s 'K'1 .-m4 "- 4t E�G.,-:6
4../4-,, ;2.4 - �� ''t. -{Qi?Ti)4a t11 w isas a,„la t g.' l� 2t;" ,Ya �g u fit
gkzA ,t ' ff � �'` Proposed ' . ,i ,„ s.. �I ; 43 in w:
4 w P.m g a
' .A , J - 0111, Restaurant Site , 41.. ,.1 2,24. • t Tt
I <r
1-'l` , `y, within Tax Lot X4%.'. a'�'At i r
i ., > 2300 ,'T •`' e`g,1� f'1 "'c
4 ° at Y it t
'x'. ^t'== _ -.t. a d' 'Via_i;,:r^1"; -., �. J*max ''� l.- 0IV
Tax Lot 2300 including the Building Site, Umpqua Bank and Portions of the Gateway
Mall Building and Parking Areas.
OTHER USES THAT MAY BE AUTHORIZED BY THE DECISION: None. The
proposed use is permitted in accordance with Springfield Development Code. No other uses
are authorized by this decision. Final Site Plan and Building Plans must conform to this decision.
REVIEW PROCESS: This application is reviewed under Type I (Ministerial) procedure listed
in Springfield Development Code Section 5.1-125 and the site plan criteria of approval SDC
5.17-125.
SITE AND PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION: The proposed site modification - -
adjusts a previously approved Site Plan Review (journal 93-11-180) which approved the current
development of the site and construction of the existing Hollywood Video building and parking
area on site. The applicant proposes to demolish the 7,570 square foot building on the site and
place the new 5,720 square foot building and 1,155 square foot covered patio in approximately
the same area. The applicant will also be making some modifications to the parking lot adding 8
additional parking spaces including one additional ADA space. An infiltration/rain garden will be
installed and additional landscaping in the interior parking lot islands will be installed. The site is
part of the Gateway Mall development. Tax tot 2300 includes the Umpqua Bank building, and _ .
part of the Gateway Mall parking lot and building. The property is zoned Community
Commercial. Surrounding properties to the north, south and west are zoned Community
Commercial. East across Gateway Street the zoning is Medium Density Residential and
developed with apartments.
Site Plan Modification TYPI 12-00036 2
•
•
Aerial of Existing Site:
k+
"32t� {.s+i , a '1 :i.:7}r e '�?y'-�.-�'+S ','.. - A- my S e -i-'• - r74.44.. '2m —74.31:14,11
• /iit it . i(7 N t- T W F , 4 ' a.•
'41 t�d 1 (�/s) r # r i f3 { � 3�r+ t a} � � _
F qE -7;:-4.0. 5.
s el,�ri ;t',:, tt s a+' r! ' f xy ' C ii;".. >'..i rc,.-4-.1,-1,-4-g,p- 13 5
riAr r Y A, e '^4r ri ,- i S. Hl {p ra @ 3 x J
3eS, 4 e{ R+,• �1^y., r}trir �4� � �.,�I q it 5 � �a lu ' N.0 r C.� ..
�` {•yn °' x;y{r i� rrw 4 a &" a 'r e r,- 4'c` fw j f',,1
X 14. �nv4 14 r g211-2" : . E- V a hT 1 -•=.TI m :% r�
t
r 4.5Ass : , e i 7,._ _7.1 r ' s nt`i r {.0 y` '4n 4
aP "e�. 1� � r .. .�. d j a }i� T y �t r r ya n jai �A w� 4�r����*
y
-3 Existing o�}^t� t 1 k it ' +i ;-::.:7...t_I- ,1 4c
g er �0ri,111,131,.:::,! 4r t�- . -9't � 4' »1
Hollywood Video "r< Yzkx cep, �I r'r ' n, a #
..can 5 w ® S s ;-4,`"1., is + F f r xi
a Building ' Y yq{�� i t r ,:yet,-,0.'....“1h {, �'• t411 a F
2770 Gateway Street #,I -t �1 i9`�` '' .. CM. h Y
n ,F*:1i s r 14 Ya � tf,,,,1^s 4h,Y , ,tr r 1I,r :f r i, �. r
Sys ,, +AT e ail Rt tut: sr • d .-i ;....f. ..ac
1' fa u r , e ,—,:.0' 1/4-1/4"45.4,w.4%!,,,‘--.1.,.4.1%d y ax rt q �r :f 5� -e f sir,:},a °
:a I` s r 1 a .;" a Jir r 1P,' Sr m' { ,t rf .*t-""•---„;s cA'
a .�'*. a Atli{aktr, L , b�w. ,� n� w f� ^Nt '�' it-- '
H.. r Y ;s.r ,:q_vII rl orre P�� ' steam--.1-1 Z' s5
i�_, ; r r�i a 1 Ar :I .,? r s �' a:"44.: { P t a� -li+ '`awA P1
,,4.1 `P4tsc. Ip G eb` ac7+ iol- t y5t3' a,,.' ,e'{ i t ,,Yi ta,...s
�I3 •, y,..,,,, Y :E -; W spy G*;�8 ��'.�k,Y yt�7.y�sk. �Y�• l Sy t3H ,x-z I
~�twF .i X - c:.. 'q�1t �`w yD ��fii '"+ y°y:t > � 'r{-'J` ah /"t'a4xt
. ,r:'i;�N?s.,t-l.if1suw� "�R ',Y L.:...�+i..1.1'»�_t�ir:..�r-rur_'sY+' )
SDC 5.17-145 (A) states: The Site Plan Modification process establishes procedures to
allow certain adjustments to an approved Site Plan, either after Preliminary
Approval or after Final Approval. This process shall assure that any proposed Site
Plan Modification continues to comply with Section 5.17-125.
SDC 5.17-145 (C) (I) states: A Minor Site Plan Modification application is evaluated
under the Type I review process. The application is reviewed based on a particular
standard as specified in this Code that does not involve a Type II or Type Ill
Variance, e.g. a modification in the location or type of required landscaping or an
insignificant change in the number and/or layout of parking spaces.
SDC 5.17-145 (D) states: The criteria of approval for a Site Plan Modification
application shall be in compliance with the applicable standard and/or criteria of
approval specified in Section 5.17-I25.
Date Received: / `' 112—
Planner: LM
TIP/12-00036 3
Site Plan Modification
Proposed Plan for new
Buffalo Wild Wings Building;
, Patio Area and Parking Lot
QA- ..,s4 scoop
\
�
\. ' 1
, . p ? II •
1
\ \ i f .l Y- .
\ 'r I I . •i.
%-;
I t �1
: F a 1 ems
Criterion A-SDC 5.17-125 (A)
The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement
Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. ,
Finding: The Community Commercial zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and
Gateway Refinement Plan diagram. _ .
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Site Plan Criterion A.
. z..a.i I
Site Plan Modification TYPI 12-00036 4
• •
Criterion B-SDC 5.17-125 (B)
Capacity requirements of public improvements, including but not limited to water and
electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic
safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to
•
serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and
other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall
determine capacity issues.
Finding: This site is a fully developed site including but not limited to water, electricity,
sanitary sewer, stormwater management facilities, street and traffic safety controls. This
proposal replaces a building similar in size in approximately the same area and will not
significantly increase the need for additional public improvements.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Site Plan Criterion B.
Criterion C -SDC 5.17-125 (C)
The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design
and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations.
SANITARY SEWER
Finding: Pursuant to Chapter 3.03.4.A of the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual and Section 4.4 of the City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual, trash enclosure
areas shall be covered and hydraulically isolated from potential stormwater runoff, and directed
to the sanitary sewer system.
Condition I: On the Final Site Plan, provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure area on the
western side of the proposed building.
Condition 2: Show the trash enclosure with cover on the Final Site Plan.
Finding: All restaurants in the Eugene/Springfield area that have sewer service installed are
required to conform with the MWMC pre treatment program. - -
Condition 3: Conform to all applicable MWMC requirements for restaurants. Contact Phil
Sprague (541-726-3675) for details.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Finding: Section 4.3-110.B of the SDC requires that the Approval Authority shall grant
development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management
• systems provisions have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent
with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM).
•
Finding: Section 4.3-1 10.D of the SDC requires that run-off from a development shall be
directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the
discharge.
Z�13 /1--
Date Received:.._..
Planner: LM
Site Plan Modification TYP I 12-00036 5
• • .
Finding: Section 4.3-110.E of the SDC requires new developments to employ drainage
management practices, which minimize the amount and rate of surface water run-off into
receiving streams, and which promote water quality.
Finding: To comply with Sections 4.3-110.D & E, stormwater runoff from the new paving on
the site will be directed into a series of infiltration planters prior to discharge into the existing
storm water system at the Springfield Mall.
WATER QUALITY
Finding: Under Federal regulation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act
(ESA), and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the City of Springfield has
obtained a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. A provision of this permit
requires the City demonstrate efforts to reduce the pollution in urban stormwater to the
Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP).
Finding: Federal and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) rules require the
City's MS4 plan address six "Minimum Control Measures." Minimum Control Measure 5, "Post-
Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment," applies to
the proposed development.
Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to develop, implement
and enforce a program to ensure the reduction of pollutants in stormwater runoff to the MEP.
The City must also develop and implement strategies that include a combination of structural or
non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate for the community.
Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield use an ordinance or
other regulatory mechanism to address post construction runoff from new and re-development
projects to the extent allowable under State law. Regulatory mechanisms used by the City
include the Springfield Development Code (SDC), the City's Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual (EDSPM) and the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SFMP).
Finding: Section 3.02 of the City's EDSPM states the Public Works Department will accept, as
interim design standards for stormwater quality, water quality facilities designed pursuant to the
policies and procedures of the City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. . _
Finding: Section 3.03.3.B of the City's EDSPM states all public and private development and
redevelopment projects shall employ a system of one or more post-developed BMPs that in
combination are designed to achieve at least a 70 percent reduction in the total suspended
solids in the runoff generated by that development. Section 3.03.4.E of the manual requires a
minimum of 50 percent of the non-building rooftop impervious area on a site shall be treated
for stormwater quality improvement using vegetative methods.
Condition 4: To meet the pretreatment requirements for stormwater quality the applicant
shall install drop in catch basin filters suitable for parking lot runoff in the existing catch basins in
the parking lot.
Finding: To meet the requirements of the City's MS4 permit, the Springfield Development
Code, and the City's EDSPM, the applicant has proposed infiltration planter for the new parking
. spaces.
•
Site Plan Modification TYP 112-00036 - 6
• •
•
Finding: The vegetation proposed for use in the infiltration planter will serve as the primary
pollutant removal mechanism for the stormwater runoff. Satisfactory pollutant removal will
occur only when the vegetation has been fully established.
Condition 5: Prior to approval of the final site plan, the applicant shall provide an operations
and maintenance plan to the City for review to ensure the long-term maintenance and operation
of the proposed infiltration planters and drop in catch basin filters. The plan should designate
maintenance responsibility for operating and maintaining the system, and should be distributed
to all property owners and tenants of the site.
Condition 6: To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of
Springfield's MS4 permit; the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the proposed
infiltration planters shall be shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior
to approval of final site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant
shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable
to the Public Works Department that will suffice until such time as the infiltration planter
vegetation becomes fully established.
SETBACKS
Finding: Section 3.2-315 of the Springfield Development Code requires developments in the
Community Commercial zoning district to maintain a minimum 10' landscape setback along the
front and street side yards to buildings and a 5' setback to parking and driveway areas.
Finding: The plans show a 15' setback from the covered patio to the front property line and
an 11' setback to the nearest point of the parking lot to the front property line.
WATER SERVICE & FIRE PROTECTION
Finding: Springfield Fire Code 2010 Section 507.5.5 requires a 3 foot clear space to be
maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants.
Condition 7: Immediate access to fire department connections shall be maintained at all times
and without obstruction by fences, bushes, trees, walls or any other object (2010 SFC 912.3). - -
Working space shall be maintained 3 feet in width on both sides of the FDC, 3 feet in depth in
front of the FDC and 78 inches in height(2010 SFC 912.3.2).
LANDSCAPING & SCREENING
Finding: Section 2.2, Commercial Element- Policies and Implementation Actions of the
• Gateway Refinement Plan requires sites in the commercial area around Gateway Street and
Beltline Road to require the following landscaping requirements through•the Site Plan Review
process:
• 7.5 percent of the interior of parking lots visible from arterials and collectors to be
landscaped.
• Require vegetative screening of parking lots. Allow such vegetative screens to include
shrubs to 3 '/z feet high, except in vision clearance areas.
Date Received:IZ/1?/I
Planner: LM
Site Plan Modification TIP 12-00036 7
• • .
:4 s d , ,y .y,
< -s- t t y .,•
\ t--,,,>:,,,.... sf `1a£
t ti h 3 1 A _ 1.'t i '-p
. 1 1 11 5 . .
t )..-C:;;"1‘ a Y- 1 a 1 ,X 4 Y �'` :h 41. h t y}l •N, ` .::%73.:".c.:-=L__`a Y d .-Nki^fw °'Nk � .4 ,r. ;4' "� C.-- c w r .2 s t te= T FieitEta . r'^ I iiii,I t-v. .
i �. .� i3.� +'3 X43
=fry .. .. .�..y5/.' }.•9:,;>';. f43 r1 ty .*..
.-�r _ -AS' • 'Sty —. .1' - gs,2 Yw t. -. "a>. y
A i L . Y t Ytc 'c 'emu �°S w --4'71 mti -' . -�S`r
a ,
=44 s�£, r � fr ? ry� View
A " A w y " � ; from
--. K ,.' .
. . t '. Gatewa y
y
. . ..
Street
Finding: Four existing interior parking lot planting islands are void of landscaping with the
exception of two trees. The applicant's landscape plan show these islands planted with trees
and shrubs. The area exceeds the required 7.5 percent required for interior parking lot .
landscaping.
•
Finding: The proposed landscaping plan shows the existing trees and grass remaining along
with added ground cover along the parking lot area on the frontage of Gateway Street.
Condition 8: On the Final Site Plan submittal, provide shrubs to 3 '/z feet high as vegetative
screening along the parking lot on the frontage of Gateway Street to comply with the
requirements of the Gateway Refinement Plan.
Finding: The applicant's landscape drawing show a different number of Village Green Zelkova
trees and Redmond Linden trees than the number shown on the Plant Material Schedule.
Condition 9: On the Final Site Plan submittal, revise the Plant Material Schedule to be
consistent with the landscape drawing. •
Finding: All new required planting areas shall be provided with a permanent underground
irrigation system unless where planted with native species or plant communities, or as may be
exempted by the director.
Condition 10: Per the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements of section 5.17-120 provide a
plan showing the permanent irrigation system for the landscape plan.
Finding: SDC Section 4.4-110 requires screening for trash receptacles. A fence or masonry
wall shall be constructed to provide a uniform sight-obscuring screen. The trash enclosure is
shown on a paved area on the west side of the building.
Condition I I: Provide detail for the screening method used for the trash enclosure.
Site Plan Modification TYP1I2-00036 8
•
VEHICLE PARKING, LOADING AND BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS
Finding: SDC 4.6-140 states the following, "Unless exempted elsewhere in this Code, all
developments shall comply with the bicycle parking provisions of this Section.
Finding: SDC Section 4.6-155 requires an Eating and Drinking Establishment of this size to
provide a total of 10 bicycle parking spaces. Three of the spaces are required to be long term
and 7 are required to be short term.
Finding: Per SDC 4.6-145 requires long term bicycle parking to be sheltered from
precipitation. Short term bicycle parking is not required to be sheltered.
Condition 12: On the Final Site Plan provide 10 bicycle parking spaces; 3 long term and 7
short term in accordance with SDC section 4.6-145 and 4.6-150.
Conclusion: The proposed site plan modification, as conditioned will satisfy
Criterion C.
Criterion D: -SDC 5.17-125 (D)
Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to facilitate vehicular traffic,
bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion;provide connectivity within the
development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity
centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize curb cuts on arterial and
collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with
the ODOT access management standards for State highways.
Finding: The only current pedestrian connection from the site to Gateway Street has been
removed on the tentative proposed plan. This sidewalk provides access from the EM/X bus
stop nearby and from pedestrians along Gateway to this location.
Condition 13: On the Final Site Plan show the preserved or replaced pedestrian sidewalk
connection to the public sidewalk on Gateway Street.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Criterion D.
Criterion E: -5.17-125 (E)
Physical features, including but not limited to steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic
conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas, other
riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces
and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section
3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified
in the Code or in State or Federal law.
Date Received: / 2--I3 J i 2
Planner: LM
Site Plan Modification TYPI I2-00036 9
• • .
Finding: The site is not within a flood hazard area and does not contain slopes, riparian areas
or wetlands. The site in a Zone of Contribution for the Sports Way Wellhead in the Drinking
Water Protection Overlay District.
Finding: Note 9 on the applicant's Landscape Plan page L I.0 states the following, "with the
exception of those trees indicated on the tree removal plan, contractor shall not remove any
trees during construction without the express written consent of the landscape architect.
Finding: The applicant's submittal did not submit a tree removal plan; however there is an
inventory of existing trees listed in a Tree Table on page CI, Site Assessment of Existing
Conditions.
Finding: SDC 5.19-1 10 requires a Tree Felling Permit prior to the felling of more than 5 trees
5-inch dbh or larger within a period of 12 consecutive months from a lot/parcel of private
property under common ownership consisting of 10,000 square feet or more of total area.
Condition 14: Provide the number, size and type of trees to be removed on the Final Site Plan
submittal. These notations can be added to the Tree Table on page C I.
Conclusion: The proposal, as conditioned, satisfies Criterion E.
CONCLUSION: The Site Plan, as conditioned, is in conformance with the applicable Criteria
1-5 of SDC 31.060.
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BY THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN FINAL SITE
PLAN APPROVAL?
FINAL SITE PLAN: A Final Site Plan Application, the Final Site Plan Fee, five copies of a Final
Site Plan and any additional required plans, documents or information are required to be
submitted to the Planning Division within 90 days of the date of this letter.
This decision is based on the submitted Tentative Site Plan. The Final Site Plan
must show conformity with the Tentative Site Plan, compliance with SDC Section
5.17 Criteria of Approval A-E, and the conditions of approval listed below. A Final Site
Plan application is attached. The fee for the Final Site Plan is $130.31 (includes Final Site Plan
Application fee of$124.10 plus 5% tech fee of$6.21)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Condition I: On the Final Site Plan, provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure area on the
western side of the proposed building.
Condition 2: Show the trash enclosure with cover on the Final Site Plan.
Condition 3: Conform to all applicable MWMC requirements for restaurants. Contact Phil
Sprague (541-726-3675) for details.
Condition 4: To meet the pretreatment requirements for stormwater quality the applicant
shall install drop in catch basin filters suitable for parking lot runoff in the existing catch basins in
the parking lot.
_ .. _. .:
Site Plan Modification TM 12-00036 10
. •
Condition 5: Prior to approval of the final site plan, the applicant shall provide an operations
and maintenance plan to the City for review to ensure the long-term maintenance and operation
of the proposed infiltration planters and drop in catch basin filters. The plan should designate
maintenance responsibility for operating and maintaining the system, and should be distributed
to all property owners and tenants of the site.
Condition 6: To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of
Springfield's MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the proposed
infiltration planters shall be shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior
to approval of final site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant
shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable
to the Public Works Department that will suffice until such time as the infiltration planter
vegetation becomes fully established.
Condition 7: Immediate access to fire department connections shall be maintained at all times
and without obstruction by fences, bushes, trees, walls or any other object (2010 SFC 912.3).
Working space shall be maintained 3 feet in width on both sides of the FDC, 3 feet in depth in
front of the FDC and 78 inches in height (2010 SFC 912.3.2).
Condition 8: On the Final Site Plan submittal, provide shrubs to 3 '/z feet high as vegetative
screening along the parking lot on the frontage of Gateway Street to comply with the -
requirements of the Gateway Refinement Plan. -
Condition 9: On the Final Site Plan submittal, revise the Plant Material Schedule to be
consistent with the landscape drawing.
Condition 10: Per the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements of section 5.17-120 provide a
plan showing the permanent irrigation system for the landscape plan.
Condition 11: Provide detail for the screening method used for the trash enclosure.
Condition 12: On the Final Site Plan provide 10 bicycle parking spaces; 3 long term and 7 •
short term in accordance with SDC section 4.6-145 and 4.6-150.
Condition 13: On the Final Site Plan show the preserved or replaced pedestrian sidewalk _
connection to the public sidewalk on Gateway Street.
Condition 14: Provide the number, size and type of trees to be removed on the Final Site Plan
submittal. These notations can be added to the Tree Table on page CI.
The Final Site Plan shall become null and void if construction has not begun within two years of
Final Site Plan approval, i.e. the signing of a Development Agreement. A single one-year
extension may be granted by the Director upon receipt of a written request by the applicant
including an explanation of the delay. Work under progress shall not be subject to
Development Approval expiration.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: In order to complete the review process, a Development
Agreement is required to ensure that the terms and conditions of site plan review are binding
upon both the applicant and the City. This agreement will be prepared by Staff upon approval of
Date Received: 1 L'/S —/ '
Site Plan Modification TYPI 12-00036 Planner: LM I
•
• •
t.
the Final Site Plan and must be signed by the property owner prior to the issuance of a building
permit. A Building Permit shall be issued by the Building Official only after the Development
Agreement has been signed by the applicant and the Director. No building or structure shall be
occupied until all improvements are made in accordance with this Article, except as specified in
Section 31.110, Security and Assurances. Upon satisfactory completion of site development, as
determined by a Final Site Inspection (prior to the final building inspection), the City shall
authorize the provision of public facilities and services and issue a Certificate of Occupancy.
•
Additional Information: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the
applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are
available at a cost of$0.75 for the first page and $0.50 for each additional page at the
Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon.
Questions:
Please contact Liz Miller at(541) 726-2301, City of Springfield Planning Division, if you have
questions regarding this process.
FEES AND PERMITS
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE:
Pay applicable Systems Development Charges when building permits are issued for
•
developments within the City limits or within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. (The
cost relates to the amount of increase in impervious surface area, transportation trip rates, and
plumbing fixture units. Some exceptions apply to Springfield Urban Growth areas.) [Springfield
Code Chapter II, Article 1 1]
Systems Development Charges (SDC's) will apply to the construction of buildings and site
improvements within the subject site. The Charges will be based upon the rates in effect at the
time of permit submittal for buildings or site improvements on each portion or phase of the
development.
OTHER PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS: - -
•
Land & Drainage Alteration Permits (LDAP). [Contact the Springfield Public Works
Department @ 726-5849 for appropriate applications/requirements]
ADDITIONAL PERMITS/APPROVALS MAY BE NECESSARY:
• Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (Pump station, sanitary sewers 24 -
inches or larger) for the pretreatment certification.
• Building Permits, Electrical Permits, Plumbing Permits
• Sign Permits
Site Plan Modification ._ -i'.?.‘P71 TYPI12-00036 12
City of Springfield • • SPRINGFIELD
' Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Final Site Plan Review
A lication :T e az •• (app/scant check one).;
Site Plan: ❑ Minor Site Plan Modification: ❑
Major Site Plan Modification: ❑
;Requird PcoJect•InfOrmatlon (App/scant:±complete this secrion)
Applicant Name: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
Applicant's Rep.: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
Property Owner: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S):
Property Address:
Size of Property: Acres ❑ Square Feet ❑
Proposed Name of Project:
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: - -
Existing Use: I Tentative Case #:
Si . natures: Please si•n and .rint our name and date in the as •ro.riate box on the next .a•e.
;Required'Project Information (City Intake-Staff: completethis section)
Associated Applications:
-
Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Postage Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER:
ca,#w iffiek' a ..x Mi...^.?JAI SM..C.-rt4+'iAn iE:.L.MMF.AMn+.w. xHFYm... w^G> :a,. .,uR'K3k91F,^nR4ffigr1.'1.,Nrr..,Y..4 Cr. ,1/41/4 rw� 9 S,1 .M1:..> et:1,1/4r
Date Received:
Planner: LM
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 4
• •
■
Signature
•
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm that the information identified by the
City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not
otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application.
Owner:
•
Date:
Signature
Print
•
•
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 2 of 4
• •
1 Final Site Plan Review Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Final Site Plan Review Application to the Development Services
Department
• The application must conform to the Final Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Check list on page 4 of this application packet.
• Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine
whether all required items listed in the Final Site Plan Review Submittal
Requirements Checklist have been submitted.
• Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal.
2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check
• Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of
submittal.
• The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of
the application.
• An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary
to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the
provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and
statutes have been provided.
• Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the
application review process and may result in denial.
3. City Staff Review the Application & Issues Final Approval
• This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public
hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development
standards that do not require the use of discretion.
• Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which
is effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed.
4. City Drafts a Development Agreement
• Applicant and City sign Development Agreement
• Final Site Plan and Development Agreement become null and void if construction
has not begun within two years of signing the Development Agreement.
5. City Conducts Final Site Inspection
• City authorizes provision of public facilities and services and issues Certificate of
Occupancy
•
Date Received./2
Planner: LM
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 4
• • ,
Final Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
❑ Final Site Plan Review Application Form
❑ Letter Addressing Conditions of Approval - lists and addresses each condition of
approval, detailing the actions taken and current status of each item.
❑ Five (5) Copies of the Final Site Plan Sets incorporating all required modifications and
applicable conditions
❑ Additional Documents requested as Conditions of Approval as part of the Site Plan
Review decision.
,i +•y
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian • 4 of 4
• •
1
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 5th ST
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
Terry Novak
Novak Architecture, Inc
Ia 6975 SW Sandburg St, Ste 320
Portland, OR 97223
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 5th ST 4
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 -
Dan Allen
DLA Construction Services
1307 Columbia Street
Vancouver, WA 98660
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 5th ST
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
_
GGP Gateway Mall Partners LLC
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
12 13I2-
Date Received..—
Planner LM