Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 12/13/2012 -i U. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE DEC 1 3 2012 Bye Acct Oot, STATE OF OREGON ) / DP 0 ss. " County of Lane ) I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows: 1. I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon. 2. I state that in my capacity as, Program Technician, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies of TYP112-tn26 A/B&?.t 0, batr xc".�-te, (See attachment "A") on 10t/1., , 2012 addressed to (see Attachment "B"), by causing said letters to be placed in a U.S.mail box i ° with postage fully prepaid thereon. cam, katte„,,_ orail_atA- .Karen LaFleur STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane December Pm, , 2012. Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur, Program Technician, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act Before me: c4A _ i — / 1 „fit..,, OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission Expires: 1 ala(n' 1 Cj -.,R MISTY DAWN BRITTON `�`"; NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON "' COt!MISS!ON NO. 461485 MT CO" " '• '`0'I'S DECEM8E0.11,flU Date Received: ' k t / 2i Planner: LM • awaNOFInD Notice of Decision - Site Plan Modification - Minor, Type I 61, • Project Name: Buffalo Wild Wings Grill and Bar • Project Proposal: New Buffalo Wild Wings Restaurant and Bar at Gateway Mall to replace the former Hollywood Video building. Case Number Typ 112-00036 Project Location: The property is located at 2770 Gateway Street, Assessor's Map 17-03-22- 00; Tax Lot 2300 Zoning: Community Commercial Applicable Refinement Plan and Designation: Gateway Refinement Plan Metro Plan Designation: Commercial Application Submitted Date: November 13, 2012 Decision Issued Date: December 13, 2012 Recommendation: Approval, with Conditions Associated Applications: Jo. No. 93-11-180 (Site Plan Review— Hollywood Video) CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REVIEW TEAM POSITION REVIEW OF • NAME PHONE Planner I Land Use Planning Liz Miller (541)726-2301 Public Works Engineering Sanitary & Storm Sewer, Clayton (541)736-1036 Utilities& Easements McEachern Deputy Fire Marshall Fire and Life Safety Gilbert (541)726-2293 Gordon • Plans Examiner - Building Chris (541)744-4153- Carpenter APPLICANT APPLICANT'S PROPERTY OWNER REPRESENTATIVE Terry Novak Dan Allen GGP Gateway Mall Partners LLC Novak Architecture, Inc. DLA Construction Services 1 1 14 Avenue of the Americas 6975 SW Sandburg Street, Ste. 320 1307 Columbia Street New York, New York 10036 Portland, OR 97223 Vancouver, WA 98660 • DECISION: Tentative Site Plan Modification Approval, with conditions, as of the date of this letter. • 2' Date Received: 3 t Planner: LM Site Plan Modification TYP 112-00036 • P i (745!;1,>7?..., --t-ii,..., �y r avrRPc _ �.. n ., s 1 ia cnfiyaa �� 4 z .1 4, "* f .. - 'o-i' .�xyyir +€y`01' if Y t f ili i a1 X10 x 3 p,.v r Sf1T Rbb� 1 ML S`i"sA^ i �� ./ i'xrn.�e'� w 3r f Vt` 1�'S r 3,KS` x iE t .. 5','t� 'xy h(`':"'titi:1;4 ,11$1.- 'llpp,4;.6.0' 4r -` +h•-47j. i al _ I .. .. �' 1,.. . M.ais`'t/v1�\i-vit k t Lx,. '� as d� y >p # 1 W .r� �c444i;w .+< Firdt ?� y`AJ , 4 rtt -.: ,f. i + , e.: • :I �1a1 ^.4a n 4C�faskiet 7 >n s 'K'1 .-m4 "- 4t E�G.,-:6 4../4-,, ;2.4 - �� ''t. -{Qi?Ti)4a t11 w isas a,„la t g.' l� 2t;" ,Ya �g u fit gkzA ,t ' ff � �'` Proposed ' . ,i ,„ s.. �I ; 43 in w: 4 w P.m g a ' .A , J - 0111, Restaurant Site , 41.. ,.1 2,24. • t Tt I <r 1-'l` , `y, within Tax Lot X4%.'. a'�'At i r i ., > 2300 ,'T •`' e`g,1� f'1 "'c 4 ° at Y it t 'x'. ^t'== _ -.t. a d' 'Via_i;,:r^1"; -., �. J*max ''� l.- 0IV Tax Lot 2300 including the Building Site, Umpqua Bank and Portions of the Gateway Mall Building and Parking Areas. OTHER USES THAT MAY BE AUTHORIZED BY THE DECISION: None. The proposed use is permitted in accordance with Springfield Development Code. No other uses are authorized by this decision. Final Site Plan and Building Plans must conform to this decision. REVIEW PROCESS: This application is reviewed under Type I (Ministerial) procedure listed in Springfield Development Code Section 5.1-125 and the site plan criteria of approval SDC 5.17-125. SITE AND PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION: The proposed site modification - - adjusts a previously approved Site Plan Review (journal 93-11-180) which approved the current development of the site and construction of the existing Hollywood Video building and parking area on site. The applicant proposes to demolish the 7,570 square foot building on the site and place the new 5,720 square foot building and 1,155 square foot covered patio in approximately the same area. The applicant will also be making some modifications to the parking lot adding 8 additional parking spaces including one additional ADA space. An infiltration/rain garden will be installed and additional landscaping in the interior parking lot islands will be installed. The site is part of the Gateway Mall development. Tax tot 2300 includes the Umpqua Bank building, and _ . part of the Gateway Mall parking lot and building. The property is zoned Community Commercial. Surrounding properties to the north, south and west are zoned Community Commercial. East across Gateway Street the zoning is Medium Density Residential and developed with apartments. Site Plan Modification TYPI 12-00036 2 • • Aerial of Existing Site: k+ "32t� {.s+i , a '1 :i.:7}r e '�?y'-�.-�'+S ','.. - A- my S e -i-'• - r74.44.. '2m —74.31:14,11 • /iit it . i(7 N t- T W F , 4 ' a.• '41 t�d 1 (�/s) r # r i f3 { � 3�r+ t a} � � _ F qE -7;:-4.0. 5. s el,�ri ;t',:, tt s a+' r! ' f xy ' C ii;".. >'..i rc,.-4-.1,-1,-4-g,p- 13 5 riAr r Y A, e '^4r ri ,- i S. Hl {p ra @ 3 x J 3eS, 4 e{ R+,• �1^y., r}trir �4� � �.,�I q it 5 � �a lu ' N.0 r C.� .. �` {•yn °' x;y{r i� rrw 4 a &" a 'r e r,- 4'c` fw j f',,1 X 14. �nv4 14 r g211-2" : . E- V a hT 1 -•=.TI m :% r� t r 4.5Ass : , e i 7,._ _7.1 r ' s nt`i r {.0 y` '4n 4 aP "e�. 1� � r .. .�. d j a }i� T y �t r r ya n jai �A w� 4�r����* y -3 Existing o�}^t� t 1 k it ' +i ;-::.:7...t_I- ,1 4c g er �0ri,111,131,.:::,! 4r t�- . -9't � 4' »1 Hollywood Video "r< Yzkx cep, �I r'r ' n, a # ..can 5 w ® S s ;-4,`"1., is + F f r xi a Building ' Y yq{�� i t r ,:yet,-,0.'....“1h {, �'• t411 a F 2770 Gateway Street #,I -t �1 i9`�` '' .. CM. h Y n ,F*:1i s r 14 Ya � tf,,,,1^s 4h,Y , ,tr r 1I,r :f r i, �. r Sys ,, +AT e ail Rt tut: sr • d .-i ;....f. ..ac 1' fa u r , e ,—,:.0' 1/4-1/4"45.4,w.4%!,,,‘--.1.,.4.1%d y ax rt q �r :f 5� -e f sir,:},a ° :a I` s r 1 a .;" a Jir r 1P,' Sr m' { ,t rf .*t-""•---„;s cA' a .�'*. a Atli{aktr, L , b�w. ,� n� w f� ^Nt '�' it-- ' H.. r Y ;s.r ,:q_vII rl orre P�� ' steam--.1-1 Z' s5 i�_, ; r r�i a 1 Ar :I .,? r s �' a:"44.: { P t a� -li+ '`awA P1 ,,4.1 `P4tsc. Ip G eb` ac7+ iol- t y5t3' a,,.' ,e'{ i t ,,Yi ta,...s �I3 •, y,..,,,, Y :E -; W spy G*;�8 ��'.�k,Y yt�7.y�sk. �Y�• l Sy t3H ,x-z I ~�twF .i X - c:.. 'q�1t �`w yD ��fii '"+ y°y:t > � 'r{-'J` ah /"t'a4xt . ,r:'i;�N?s.,t-l.if1suw� "�R ',Y L.:...�+i..1.1'»�_t�ir:..�r-rur_'sY+' ) SDC 5.17-145 (A) states: The Site Plan Modification process establishes procedures to allow certain adjustments to an approved Site Plan, either after Preliminary Approval or after Final Approval. This process shall assure that any proposed Site Plan Modification continues to comply with Section 5.17-125. SDC 5.17-145 (C) (I) states: A Minor Site Plan Modification application is evaluated under the Type I review process. The application is reviewed based on a particular standard as specified in this Code that does not involve a Type II or Type Ill Variance, e.g. a modification in the location or type of required landscaping or an insignificant change in the number and/or layout of parking spaces. SDC 5.17-145 (D) states: The criteria of approval for a Site Plan Modification application shall be in compliance with the applicable standard and/or criteria of approval specified in Section 5.17-I25. Date Received: / `' 112— Planner: LM TIP/12-00036 3 Site Plan Modification Proposed Plan for new Buffalo Wild Wings Building; , Patio Area and Parking Lot QA- ..,s4 scoop \ � \. ' 1 , . p ? II • 1 \ \ i f .l Y- . \ 'r I I . •i. %-; I t �1 : F a 1 ems Criterion A-SDC 5.17-125 (A) The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. , Finding: The Community Commercial zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and Gateway Refinement Plan diagram. _ . Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Site Plan Criterion A. . z..a.i I Site Plan Modification TYPI 12-00036 4 • • Criterion B-SDC 5.17-125 (B) Capacity requirements of public improvements, including but not limited to water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to • serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Finding: This site is a fully developed site including but not limited to water, electricity, sanitary sewer, stormwater management facilities, street and traffic safety controls. This proposal replaces a building similar in size in approximately the same area and will not significantly increase the need for additional public improvements. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Site Plan Criterion B. Criterion C -SDC 5.17-125 (C) The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. SANITARY SEWER Finding: Pursuant to Chapter 3.03.4.A of the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and Section 4.4 of the City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual, trash enclosure areas shall be covered and hydraulically isolated from potential stormwater runoff, and directed to the sanitary sewer system. Condition I: On the Final Site Plan, provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure area on the western side of the proposed building. Condition 2: Show the trash enclosure with cover on the Final Site Plan. Finding: All restaurants in the Eugene/Springfield area that have sewer service installed are required to conform with the MWMC pre treatment program. - - Condition 3: Conform to all applicable MWMC requirements for restaurants. Contact Phil Sprague (541-726-3675) for details. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Finding: Section 4.3-110.B of the SDC requires that the Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management • systems provisions have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). • Finding: Section 4.3-1 10.D of the SDC requires that run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Z�13 /1-- Date Received:.._.. Planner: LM Site Plan Modification TYP I 12-00036 5 • • . Finding: Section 4.3-110.E of the SDC requires new developments to employ drainage management practices, which minimize the amount and rate of surface water run-off into receiving streams, and which promote water quality. Finding: To comply with Sections 4.3-110.D & E, stormwater runoff from the new paving on the site will be directed into a series of infiltration planters prior to discharge into the existing storm water system at the Springfield Mall. WATER QUALITY Finding: Under Federal regulation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the City of Springfield has obtained a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. A provision of this permit requires the City demonstrate efforts to reduce the pollution in urban stormwater to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). Finding: Federal and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) rules require the City's MS4 plan address six "Minimum Control Measures." Minimum Control Measure 5, "Post- Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment," applies to the proposed development. Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to develop, implement and enforce a program to ensure the reduction of pollutants in stormwater runoff to the MEP. The City must also develop and implement strategies that include a combination of structural or non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate for the community. Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield use an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to address post construction runoff from new and re-development projects to the extent allowable under State law. Regulatory mechanisms used by the City include the Springfield Development Code (SDC), the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) and the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SFMP). Finding: Section 3.02 of the City's EDSPM states the Public Works Department will accept, as interim design standards for stormwater quality, water quality facilities designed pursuant to the policies and procedures of the City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. . _ Finding: Section 3.03.3.B of the City's EDSPM states all public and private development and redevelopment projects shall employ a system of one or more post-developed BMPs that in combination are designed to achieve at least a 70 percent reduction in the total suspended solids in the runoff generated by that development. Section 3.03.4.E of the manual requires a minimum of 50 percent of the non-building rooftop impervious area on a site shall be treated for stormwater quality improvement using vegetative methods. Condition 4: To meet the pretreatment requirements for stormwater quality the applicant shall install drop in catch basin filters suitable for parking lot runoff in the existing catch basins in the parking lot. Finding: To meet the requirements of the City's MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the City's EDSPM, the applicant has proposed infiltration planter for the new parking . spaces. • Site Plan Modification TYP 112-00036 - 6 • • • Finding: The vegetation proposed for use in the infiltration planter will serve as the primary pollutant removal mechanism for the stormwater runoff. Satisfactory pollutant removal will occur only when the vegetation has been fully established. Condition 5: Prior to approval of the final site plan, the applicant shall provide an operations and maintenance plan to the City for review to ensure the long-term maintenance and operation of the proposed infiltration planters and drop in catch basin filters. The plan should designate maintenance responsibility for operating and maintaining the system, and should be distributed to all property owners and tenants of the site. Condition 6: To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield's MS4 permit; the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the proposed infiltration planters shall be shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to approval of final site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice until such time as the infiltration planter vegetation becomes fully established. SETBACKS Finding: Section 3.2-315 of the Springfield Development Code requires developments in the Community Commercial zoning district to maintain a minimum 10' landscape setback along the front and street side yards to buildings and a 5' setback to parking and driveway areas. Finding: The plans show a 15' setback from the covered patio to the front property line and an 11' setback to the nearest point of the parking lot to the front property line. WATER SERVICE & FIRE PROTECTION Finding: Springfield Fire Code 2010 Section 507.5.5 requires a 3 foot clear space to be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants. Condition 7: Immediate access to fire department connections shall be maintained at all times and without obstruction by fences, bushes, trees, walls or any other object (2010 SFC 912.3). - - Working space shall be maintained 3 feet in width on both sides of the FDC, 3 feet in depth in front of the FDC and 78 inches in height(2010 SFC 912.3.2). LANDSCAPING & SCREENING Finding: Section 2.2, Commercial Element- Policies and Implementation Actions of the • Gateway Refinement Plan requires sites in the commercial area around Gateway Street and Beltline Road to require the following landscaping requirements through•the Site Plan Review process: • 7.5 percent of the interior of parking lots visible from arterials and collectors to be landscaped. • Require vegetative screening of parking lots. Allow such vegetative screens to include shrubs to 3 '/z feet high, except in vision clearance areas. Date Received:IZ/1?/I Planner: LM Site Plan Modification TIP 12-00036 7 • • . :4 s d , ,y .y, < -s- t t y .,• \ t--,,,>:,,,.... sf `1a£ t ti h 3 1 A _ 1.'t i '-p . 1 1 11 5 . . t )..-C:;;"1‘ a Y- 1 a 1 ,X 4 Y �'` :h 41. h t y}l •N, ` .::%73.:".c.:-=L__`a Y d .-Nki^fw °'Nk � .4 ,r. ;4' "� C.-- c w r .2 s t te= T FieitEta . r'^ I iiii,I t-v. . i �. .� i3.� +'3 X43 =fry .. .. .�..y5/.' }.•9:,;>';. f43 r1 ty .*.. .-�r _ -AS' • 'Sty —. .1' - gs,2 Yw t. -. "a>. y A i L . Y t Ytc 'c 'emu �°S w --4'71 mti -' . -�S`r a , =44 s�£, r � fr ? ry� View A " A w y " � ; from --. K ,.' . . . t '. Gatewa y y . . .. Street Finding: Four existing interior parking lot planting islands are void of landscaping with the exception of two trees. The applicant's landscape plan show these islands planted with trees and shrubs. The area exceeds the required 7.5 percent required for interior parking lot . landscaping. • Finding: The proposed landscaping plan shows the existing trees and grass remaining along with added ground cover along the parking lot area on the frontage of Gateway Street. Condition 8: On the Final Site Plan submittal, provide shrubs to 3 '/z feet high as vegetative screening along the parking lot on the frontage of Gateway Street to comply with the requirements of the Gateway Refinement Plan. Finding: The applicant's landscape drawing show a different number of Village Green Zelkova trees and Redmond Linden trees than the number shown on the Plant Material Schedule. Condition 9: On the Final Site Plan submittal, revise the Plant Material Schedule to be consistent with the landscape drawing. • Finding: All new required planting areas shall be provided with a permanent underground irrigation system unless where planted with native species or plant communities, or as may be exempted by the director. Condition 10: Per the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements of section 5.17-120 provide a plan showing the permanent irrigation system for the landscape plan. Finding: SDC Section 4.4-110 requires screening for trash receptacles. A fence or masonry wall shall be constructed to provide a uniform sight-obscuring screen. The trash enclosure is shown on a paved area on the west side of the building. Condition I I: Provide detail for the screening method used for the trash enclosure. Site Plan Modification TYP1I2-00036 8 • VEHICLE PARKING, LOADING AND BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS Finding: SDC 4.6-140 states the following, "Unless exempted elsewhere in this Code, all developments shall comply with the bicycle parking provisions of this Section. Finding: SDC Section 4.6-155 requires an Eating and Drinking Establishment of this size to provide a total of 10 bicycle parking spaces. Three of the spaces are required to be long term and 7 are required to be short term. Finding: Per SDC 4.6-145 requires long term bicycle parking to be sheltered from precipitation. Short term bicycle parking is not required to be sheltered. Condition 12: On the Final Site Plan provide 10 bicycle parking spaces; 3 long term and 7 short term in accordance with SDC section 4.6-145 and 4.6-150. Conclusion: The proposed site plan modification, as conditioned will satisfy Criterion C. Criterion D: -SDC 5.17-125 (D) Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion;provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize curb cuts on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Finding: The only current pedestrian connection from the site to Gateway Street has been removed on the tentative proposed plan. This sidewalk provides access from the EM/X bus stop nearby and from pedestrians along Gateway to this location. Condition 13: On the Final Site Plan show the preserved or replaced pedestrian sidewalk connection to the public sidewalk on Gateway Street. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Criterion D. Criterion E: -5.17-125 (E) Physical features, including but not limited to steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas, other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in the Code or in State or Federal law. Date Received: / 2--I3 J i 2 Planner: LM Site Plan Modification TYPI I2-00036 9 • • . Finding: The site is not within a flood hazard area and does not contain slopes, riparian areas or wetlands. The site in a Zone of Contribution for the Sports Way Wellhead in the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District. Finding: Note 9 on the applicant's Landscape Plan page L I.0 states the following, "with the exception of those trees indicated on the tree removal plan, contractor shall not remove any trees during construction without the express written consent of the landscape architect. Finding: The applicant's submittal did not submit a tree removal plan; however there is an inventory of existing trees listed in a Tree Table on page CI, Site Assessment of Existing Conditions. Finding: SDC 5.19-1 10 requires a Tree Felling Permit prior to the felling of more than 5 trees 5-inch dbh or larger within a period of 12 consecutive months from a lot/parcel of private property under common ownership consisting of 10,000 square feet or more of total area. Condition 14: Provide the number, size and type of trees to be removed on the Final Site Plan submittal. These notations can be added to the Tree Table on page C I. Conclusion: The proposal, as conditioned, satisfies Criterion E. CONCLUSION: The Site Plan, as conditioned, is in conformance with the applicable Criteria 1-5 of SDC 31.060. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BY THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL? FINAL SITE PLAN: A Final Site Plan Application, the Final Site Plan Fee, five copies of a Final Site Plan and any additional required plans, documents or information are required to be submitted to the Planning Division within 90 days of the date of this letter. This decision is based on the submitted Tentative Site Plan. The Final Site Plan must show conformity with the Tentative Site Plan, compliance with SDC Section 5.17 Criteria of Approval A-E, and the conditions of approval listed below. A Final Site Plan application is attached. The fee for the Final Site Plan is $130.31 (includes Final Site Plan Application fee of$124.10 plus 5% tech fee of$6.21) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Condition I: On the Final Site Plan, provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure area on the western side of the proposed building. Condition 2: Show the trash enclosure with cover on the Final Site Plan. Condition 3: Conform to all applicable MWMC requirements for restaurants. Contact Phil Sprague (541-726-3675) for details. Condition 4: To meet the pretreatment requirements for stormwater quality the applicant shall install drop in catch basin filters suitable for parking lot runoff in the existing catch basins in the parking lot. _ .. _. .: Site Plan Modification TM 12-00036 10 . • Condition 5: Prior to approval of the final site plan, the applicant shall provide an operations and maintenance plan to the City for review to ensure the long-term maintenance and operation of the proposed infiltration planters and drop in catch basin filters. The plan should designate maintenance responsibility for operating and maintaining the system, and should be distributed to all property owners and tenants of the site. Condition 6: To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield's MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the proposed infiltration planters shall be shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to approval of final site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice until such time as the infiltration planter vegetation becomes fully established. Condition 7: Immediate access to fire department connections shall be maintained at all times and without obstruction by fences, bushes, trees, walls or any other object (2010 SFC 912.3). Working space shall be maintained 3 feet in width on both sides of the FDC, 3 feet in depth in front of the FDC and 78 inches in height (2010 SFC 912.3.2). Condition 8: On the Final Site Plan submittal, provide shrubs to 3 '/z feet high as vegetative screening along the parking lot on the frontage of Gateway Street to comply with the - requirements of the Gateway Refinement Plan. - Condition 9: On the Final Site Plan submittal, revise the Plant Material Schedule to be consistent with the landscape drawing. Condition 10: Per the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements of section 5.17-120 provide a plan showing the permanent irrigation system for the landscape plan. Condition 11: Provide detail for the screening method used for the trash enclosure. Condition 12: On the Final Site Plan provide 10 bicycle parking spaces; 3 long term and 7 • short term in accordance with SDC section 4.6-145 and 4.6-150. Condition 13: On the Final Site Plan show the preserved or replaced pedestrian sidewalk _ connection to the public sidewalk on Gateway Street. Condition 14: Provide the number, size and type of trees to be removed on the Final Site Plan submittal. These notations can be added to the Tree Table on page CI. The Final Site Plan shall become null and void if construction has not begun within two years of Final Site Plan approval, i.e. the signing of a Development Agreement. A single one-year extension may be granted by the Director upon receipt of a written request by the applicant including an explanation of the delay. Work under progress shall not be subject to Development Approval expiration. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: In order to complete the review process, a Development Agreement is required to ensure that the terms and conditions of site plan review are binding upon both the applicant and the City. This agreement will be prepared by Staff upon approval of Date Received: 1 L'/S —/ ' Site Plan Modification TYPI 12-00036 Planner: LM I • • • t. the Final Site Plan and must be signed by the property owner prior to the issuance of a building permit. A Building Permit shall be issued by the Building Official only after the Development Agreement has been signed by the applicant and the Director. No building or structure shall be occupied until all improvements are made in accordance with this Article, except as specified in Section 31.110, Security and Assurances. Upon satisfactory completion of site development, as determined by a Final Site Inspection (prior to the final building inspection), the City shall authorize the provision of public facilities and services and issue a Certificate of Occupancy. • Additional Information: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available at a cost of$0.75 for the first page and $0.50 for each additional page at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Questions: Please contact Liz Miller at(541) 726-2301, City of Springfield Planning Division, if you have questions regarding this process. FEES AND PERMITS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE: Pay applicable Systems Development Charges when building permits are issued for • developments within the City limits or within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. (The cost relates to the amount of increase in impervious surface area, transportation trip rates, and plumbing fixture units. Some exceptions apply to Springfield Urban Growth areas.) [Springfield Code Chapter II, Article 1 1] Systems Development Charges (SDC's) will apply to the construction of buildings and site improvements within the subject site. The Charges will be based upon the rates in effect at the time of permit submittal for buildings or site improvements on each portion or phase of the development. OTHER PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS: - - • Land & Drainage Alteration Permits (LDAP). [Contact the Springfield Public Works Department @ 726-5849 for appropriate applications/requirements] ADDITIONAL PERMITS/APPROVALS MAY BE NECESSARY: • Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (Pump station, sanitary sewers 24 - inches or larger) for the pretreatment certification. • Building Permits, Electrical Permits, Plumbing Permits • Sign Permits Site Plan Modification ._ -i'.?.‘P71 TYPI12-00036 12 City of Springfield • • SPRINGFIELD ' Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Final Site Plan Review A lication :T e az •• (app/scant check one).; Site Plan: ❑ Minor Site Plan Modification: ❑ Major Site Plan Modification: ❑ ;Requird PcoJect•InfOrmatlon (App/scant:±complete this secrion) Applicant Name: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Applicant's Rep.: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Size of Property: Acres ❑ Square Feet ❑ Proposed Name of Project: Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: - - Existing Use: I Tentative Case #: Si . natures: Please si•n and .rint our name and date in the as •ro.riate box on the next .a•e. ;Required'Project Information (City Intake-Staff: completethis section) Associated Applications: - Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: ca,#w iffiek' a ..x Mi...^.?JAI SM..C.-rt4+'iAn iE:.L.MMF.AMn+.w. xHFYm... w^G> :a,. .,uR'K3k91F,^nR4ffigr1.'1.,Nrr..,Y..4 Cr. ,1/41/4 rw� 9 S,1 .M1:..> et:1,1/4r Date Received: Planner: LM Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 4 • • ■ Signature • I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm that the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: • Date: Signature Print • • Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 2 of 4 • • 1 Final Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Final Site Plan Review Application to the Development Services Department • The application must conform to the Final Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Check list on page 4 of this application packet. • Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed in the Final Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist have been submitted. • Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result in denial. 3. City Staff Review the Application & Issues Final Approval • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. 4. City Drafts a Development Agreement • Applicant and City sign Development Agreement • Final Site Plan and Development Agreement become null and void if construction has not begun within two years of signing the Development Agreement. 5. City Conducts Final Site Inspection • City authorizes provision of public facilities and services and issues Certificate of Occupancy • Date Received./2 Planner: LM Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 4 • • , Final Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ❑ Final Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Letter Addressing Conditions of Approval - lists and addresses each condition of approval, detailing the actions taken and current status of each item. ❑ Five (5) Copies of the Final Site Plan Sets incorporating all required modifications and applicable conditions ❑ Additional Documents requested as Conditions of Approval as part of the Site Plan Review decision. ,i +•y Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian • 4 of 4 • • 1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Terry Novak Novak Architecture, Inc Ia 6975 SW Sandburg St, Ste 320 Portland, OR 97223 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST 4 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 - Dan Allen DLA Construction Services 1307 Columbia Street Vancouver, WA 98660 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 _ GGP Gateway Mall Partners LLC 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 12 13I2- Date Received..— Planner LM