Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application APPLICANT 6/26/2013
• r • • ;City of Springfield SPRINGFIELD Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 linL* Site Plan Review Application Type (Applicant: check one) Site Plan Review Pre-Submittal: ;A Major Site Plan Modification Pre-Submittal: ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: ► Major Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name:Alpesh Patel Phone:541-544-8440 Company:ALKOInvestments Email: alpatel9 @gmail.com Address: 1857 Franklin Blvd, Eugene, OR 97403 Applicant's Rep.: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI, Principal phone:541-686-4540 Company:Schirmer Satre Group Email: rick @schirmersatre.com Address: 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner:Same as Applicant Phone: Company: Email: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033344; 17033433 ITAX LOT NO(S): 100; 700 Property Address:not addressed - -300 5 \t-Pt K u4 12)1_40 Size of Property:2.28 acres Acres 0 Square Feet ❑ Proposed Density: NA Proposed Name of Project: Candlewood Suites Hotel Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: See attached Existing Use: TL100: Vacant; TL700: Residential y6 152 _ New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area) sf Si•natures: Please sun and .rint our name and date in the a..ro.riate box on the next .a•e. Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Associated Applications: A-71X (3' bbbO3 C arlYt-r1 ) Signs: Pre-Sub Case No.: Ig.L /3-05312 Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: 11P Zi13�7- C�S50`J Date: 6/2,‘M Reviewed by: / Application Fee: $ 574/4I. ID Technical F{e��e::,,$ o�87. 06 Postage Fee: $ ( (00 // GG /_ Date PRt9 94IUMBER: lY QJ 1 - Gnol?i TOTAL FEES: $ lD D S �U Revised 2/27/12 EMM JUN 2 6 2013 1 of 11 Original Submittal • • Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre-Submittal The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Owner: ��� Date: ZHIc1--3 S'•I4;t re pesl� Al Print Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information Identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the Information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal,and the City may begin processing the application with the Information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: A/ ' Date: 61/3/13 ra ure Print Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal Revised 2/27/12 EMM 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. VI Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre-submittal and submittal stages. VI Site Plan Review Application Form Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. • VI Copy of the Deed cQ Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'/a"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ❑ State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an By City application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. Completed Attached Scoping Sheet Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: 12 All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. 0 All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Date Received: JUN 262013 Revised 2/27/12 EMM Original Submittal 4 of 11 • • • a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions fl Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor I4 Vicinity Map p The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed.. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. NI The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department N The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision NI The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department N Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan N Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor N Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. N Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs N Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections N Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces GI Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district N On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation N Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed N Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces • Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile) rg Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and ot1ttilr1IC and semi-public uses JUN 262013 Revised 2/23/12 EMM 5 of 11 Original Submittal • • 12 Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan p Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor 0 Location and width of all existing easements p Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. p Location and type of existing street lighting p Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities p Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails p Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. 12 Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan p Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below 0 The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components p Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development p Location and width of all proposed easements 12 Location and type of proposed street lighting p Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal e. Landscape Plan Revised 2/23/12 EMM 6 of 11 Fl Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director 0 Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage p Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 NI Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans p Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On-Site Lighting Plan NI Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached 0 Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: D List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. LATE® Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. LATdI Photometric test report for each light source. p An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: 0 Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. li A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Date Received: lsgi Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional mdUNigt&013 Revised 2/23/12 EMM Original Szitfttttal demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 VI Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW I® A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer c4 Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives VI Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property I'M The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request LATfq Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Imo. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 WI An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer • Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal Revised 2/23/12 EMM 8 of 11 • • atiOPRIHOFIGLO ___ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/Engineering Division Phone:(541)726-3753 Fax:(541)736-1021 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK —(Area below this line filled out by Applicant)--- (Please return to Matt Stoutler @City of Springfield Public Works Engineering;Fax#736.1021,Phone#736-1035.) Project Name: Candlewood Suites Applicant: App.Rep:Richard M Satre Assessor❑Parcel 17033433-00700 and 17033344-00100 Date: Apri16,2013 Land Use(s): Proposed 85 Unit Hotel Phone l#: 541-686-4540, Project SizO (Ocres): 98,334 sf(Approx.2.28 acres) Fax#: 541-086-4577 ApppproD.Lnppervious 31,336 et Email: nck&schlnnersatre.com kIG�7a7:q�..31; JA nt', i„r.a 9 trace ,.. Am■.,esmbin r. :1. G'- 7IL9s®1 i ' ir��: rc:::,r;;rr. ;roi,.,�,,,c: �eu,I� ,u, Project Description(Include a copy'of Assessor's map): Development of a 5-story,85-unit Candlewood Suites Hotel on Franklin Blvd in Glenwood. Includes primary access off of Franklin Blvd,parking for 86 vehicles,drive aisles and loading area;as well as landscaping and a vegetated stormwater swab of approximately 3,200 sf. Drainage Proposal(Public connection(s),discharge location(s),etc. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: • On-site stormwater runoff will collect Into catch basins which drain Into the proposed vegetated swat°. Runoff will be vegetatively pre-treated and allowed to either percolate or evaporate. Storm event flows will flow from the swats into the adjacent existing riparlanlwefland along the southern border of the site(Reach#4 of the Glenwood Slough). See attached Grading and Utility Plan and excerpt from Springfield Stormwater Master Plan. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Construction phase:Erosion control measures. Development 100%runoff will be vegetatively treated. —area below this line filled oat by the City and Returned to the App/lea,;:)—= - (At a minimum,all boxes checked by the City on thefrant and back of this sheet shall be submitted for an application to be cobgplete for submittah although other requirements may be necessary.) • Drainage Study'Tyne(EDSPM Section 4.03.2):(Note.UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid-Level Development Study—(use Unitliydrograph Method for calculations) Full Drainage Development Study-(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: • Wellhead Zone: u/tt ® Hillside Development: I✓1” ® Wetland/Rapariad: Loc,J Wertanor —`!es Floodway/FloodAlain: r✓IA ® SoilTyEe: - . -_ ti-i- -k lis x.14)1 nay P.M OtheS) 1u riem *ter Downstream Analysis: "l`"' tut"' -,, r a N/A ❑ Flowlline for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design I3CIL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manliole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Matt Stonder @ City of Springfield,email:mstouder gci.springileld.or.us,FAX:(541)736-1021 • Date Received: • loot t1 JUN 2 6 2Q13 Original Submittal_____ • • COMPY ETE STUDY ITEMS Por Official Use Only: mks- "Based upon the Information provided on the front of this sheet,the following represents a ntininrum ofwhat is neededfor an application to be complete for submittalwith respect to drainage,'however,this liar should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Coda(SDC)or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval;Additional site speck information may be required. Note:Upon seeping sheet submittal,ensure completed form has ,.been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality(EDSPM Chapter 3) Re 'd N/A ❑ All non-building rooftop(NOR)impervious surfaces shall be pro-treated(e.g.multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil . filtration media)for stormwater quality. Additionally,a minimum of 50%of the NOR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ® ❑Where required,vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards(EDSPM Section 3.02), _ xi forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services(BBS)or Clean Water Services(CWS). —4 a.. t. sr r,Naaeer a t -IN ❑ For new NBA impervious area less than 15,000 square feet,a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by:the BES for vegetative treatment. Egd ❑ If a stonnwatertreatment swale is proposed,submit calculations/specifications for sizing,velocity,flow,side slopes, bottom slope,and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements. 1 El Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM ❑ All building rooftop mounted equipment,or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building,shall belprovided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements(EDSPM Section 4.03) ❑ 0 Drainage study prepared by aProfessional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. ❑ A complete drainage study,as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1,including a hydrological study map. ' Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event. ❑ mo time of concentration(To)shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) ❑ A A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.034.0. On-site drainage shall be governed by the • Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code(OPSC). ❑ Elevations of the'fIGL and flow limes for both city and private systems where applicable. I Design of Storm Systems(EDSPM Section 4.04) nil 0 Flow lines,slopes,rim elevations,pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinfomed pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, . or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ G Manning's"n"values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve aminimom velocity of three(3)feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Misc I al ❑ Existing and proposed contours,located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains i. ❑ Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another ❑ ® Drywo]Is shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMII's,with the exception of residential building roofs(EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as requited by the DEQ. Refer to the.website: www.dea.state.or.uslwq/eroundwa/uiohome.hcnl for more information. ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pro-development rotes for the 2 through 25-year storm events ' *This form shall be included as an attachment,inside the front cover,o ee stormwater study I •IMPORTANT ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN! • As the engineer of record,I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan sot.1 �/ A Signature: • )fe/�� Date: 7p911-3 Date Received: l'o`ll JUN 262013 Original Submittal 0 • • 48i Vi , \ i frill klif 7 ; 8 u 5 Ism 1 , $1 '� a°• a =I sx iiI! gi _ cn --_- __ d I V.1 : - �1 ■ of - iii sg I V� � Y ,' ,,1. 1 11 8 5 6 3 1 \ --- --i a ? 1 It A 1 8 \ 1 \ , ��yyppp qqqq }�yti 1 �� i l r �ij iRNA 1 5 \ l " _ ' I _ ° 1� Jii' 1 4\\':\ 150 I ' I ifizi■;El I : +''.// " ' ,j ''\ \A\ .. \ . zi3 I I I. I ill it rd.',i�.1 ,,'g '`�,i 1 1 'wo , , aim , .111, lakii: ;;90, 1 \\\ 1 , \ \ !ci I Ill i a O7 t0 . _-i�. 1 _ ` IMF 11f I■ it 1 pi — 1■� FA Ad //, 1 1 jp. t fI 4t I 1 0 f1 v 1 1 i J I ' 111 ,"1. 1 co 4 f - r I i - 1i, s .. CO C I I I ,.. .� f1 r t$ a ai �$ r I gi 1 3. N : o I i =Ny ! b! J) /' , 1` s ;eir�, 11 1 5 - -.0- . — [ g; p ''-1: Iji \ * I i 1 r IV I � ,,� > 01 "*".111 I I iil III il ; ii II I' lilliiiii Ili; d fie sol.RP,/,p, i [ ill = P' I �+e ` a i j a 4 1 ; i II 11 t ii 1 1-1 lei f f E IIE • • June 25. 2013 Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review Candlewood Suites Hotel —3005 Franklin Boulevard Site Plan Review Map 17-03-33-44, Lot 100 and Map 17-03-34-33, Lot 700 WRITTEN STATEMENT In accordance with SDC 5.17-100, Site Plan Review, the applicant, Alpesh Patel with ALKO Investments, is requesting that the City of Springfield review this request and determine that the proposal complies with criteria contained in SDC 5.17-125 and that the requested site plan review can be approved. To aid Springfield staff in this endeavor, the following information is provided. I. The Site and Existing Conditions A. Subject Site The subject site is comprised -: - ' of two tax lots (Map 17-03- !'fir: 33-44, Lot 100 and Map 17 , 03-34-33, Lot 700). Lot 700 � - ` ' ! - contains two older dwelling 'r �_ 'tl•units and an outbuilding. ! Al: 9 * %' The oldest of the dwellings is T: . approximately 294 sf in size - and dates to 1919. The ,-- . newer dwelling, the one closest to Franklin Blvd, is , about 3,180 sf and dates 16.±. ril.4111.1.%411 ' ; . L ,., a. 'E.. l:1111:0,. from 1931. The structures are proposed for removal. , Subject Site I Image from Google Earth Lot 100 is vacant except for Subject Site August 2012 a temporary use as ODOT construction staging for the adjacent 1-5 Willamette River Bridge project. B. Planning and Zoning 1. Planning. The subject site is in the Glenwood neighborhood !; of Springfield. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) x designates the property as Mixed Use (MU) with a Nodal Development (ND) overlay. For portions of the Glenwood neighborhood, including the r subject property, the Metro Plan has been updated with the recently adopted Glenwood R? Refinement Plan. The Glenwood Refinement + Plan Dierill110* Plan was comprehensive in its scope. With the o ,,,.... • Glenwood Refinement Plan, the Metro Plan ,. designation is as above and the refinement plan Lor.oroa designation is Office Mixed Use. - °'~'"""s -: dpgnw re.r4N• 2. Zoning. r With the adoption of the Glenwood Refinement Date ReGeiVe .� Plan, zoning for the subject site is the same as �,� the refinement plan —Office Mixed Use. JUN 2 6 2013 Hotels are a permitted use in the Office Mixed Use zone. + LANDSCAPE ARCNRECTS + Original Submittai 375 West 4th,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 SCNIRMER PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS Phone:541.686.4540 Fax:541.686.4577 SPREE- .....----- www.schirmersatre.com • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 2 of 18 Site Plan review-Written Statement June 25,2013- Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review II. Site Plan Review-Applicable Criteria Site Plan Review Criteria are found in Section 5.17-125, Site Plan Review-Criteria, of the Springfield Development Code. Applicable sections of the Code are in italics, followed by proposed findings of facts in normal text. 5.17-125 Criteria. The Director shall approve or approve with conditions: a Type II Site Plan Review application upon determining that approval criteria in Subsections A. through E., below have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map. and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The applicable refinement plan is the recently adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan. The adoption of the Glenwood Refinement Plan updated the Metro Plan and Refinement Plan designations as well as the zoning for the site. The Metro Plan designation is Mixed Use (MU) with a Nodal Development overlay (ND), the Refinement Plan designation is Office Mixed Use and the zoning is Office Mixed Use. Given that the zoning was applied in concert with the plan designations for the site, zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and the applicable Refinement Plan. Therefore, this criterion is met. Furthermore, the project complies with the purpose of the Nodal Development Overlay District by offering design elements that support pedestrian environments by providing bike parking, a pedestrian connection to the public right of way and transit access within walking distance. B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including, but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: Public and private facilities and services are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the site. The facility, provider and condition applicable to the site are as follows: Wastewater _ City Staff indicated at a Development Issues Meeting (PRE12-00020) that there is public wastewater service of sufficient capacity available for the project. Specifically, - wastewater service would be provided by - , , connecting to the public system at an existing �' f manhole located just off the southeast corner of the tax lot to the east of the subject site (Map 17-03-34-33, Lot 500). City Staff indicated that an easement on Tax Lot 500 could be provided to accommodate the connection. (As the City owns Lot 500, staff has indicated that this •-- ---- --- __ - - easement will be granted.) The existing public --- - system is shown on the diagram to the right. __ _— The proposed wastewater connection is shown Date Received: on the attached plans. JUN 262013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 41h Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene.OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 Original Submittal Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 3 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review Stormwater At the same Development Issues Meeting, city personnel indicated that public stormwater service will be by way of connection to the existing Glenwood Slough which borders the subject site to the south. To satisfy city standards, stormwater collected on site will first be treated on site through the use of a vegetated swale. The size, shape and location of treatment facility are shown on the attached plans. Transportation Streets - The subject site abuts Franklin Blvd, an ODOT facility - McKenzie Highway 126. Franklin Blvd is classified as a Major Arterial, has its full right-of-way and is improved with pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk and street lights along the subject property frontage. Access - Tax lot 100 has a vested right of access to Franklin Blvd by way of an agreement with ODOT (See Attachment 3 - Indenture of Access and Attachment 4 - Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road). This right of access will be utilized in the proposal by locating the access/driveway at the northeast corner of Lot 100, which, in turn, will connect to Lot 700. Secondary access will be provided by way of a future 24-foot wide driveway eastward from the site across Lot 500 connecting to an existing shared access/driveway on Lot 400. The shared nature of this driveway is on Lot 400 is based on information provided by the City of Springfield. As the City owns Lot 500, permission to cross Lot 500 will commemorated by way of a shared access easement to be granted by the City. Transit - Lane Transit District services Franklin Blvd with stops located nearby the intersection of Franklin Blvd and Glenwood Blvd. (See Attachment 1 -Vicinity Map.) Solid Waste Management Solid waste collection is provided by private firms, whose franchise territory granted by the City of Springfield includes the subject site. Regional disposal sites and the Short Mountain Landfill are operated by Lane County. Water and Electric Service Water and electric service is currently provided to the subject site. Glenwood Water District provides water service to Lot 700. Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides water to Lot 100. (Upon annexation, SUB will provide water service for both lots. SUB provides electric service for both tax lots. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Glenwood Water District provides fire protection for Lot 700, while the City of Springfield provides fire protection for Lot 100. Upon annexation of Lot 700, fire protection will be provided by the city for both tax lots. Ambulance services are provided by the City of Springfield for both tax lots. Police Protection Police protection is currently provided by Lane County for Lot 700 and the City of Springfield for Lot 100. Upon annexation, Springfield will provide police protection for both tax lots. With annexation police protection will be consistent with service provision throughout the city. Springfield Police currently travel along Franklin Blvd to provide service to surrounding areas that are incorporated into the city of Springfield. Infill annexations and development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery. Parks and Recreation The site is included within the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Recently approved Bond Measure 20-199 will provide $20 million in bond funds which will a se to help fun uate Kecelve : Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•FaxittN6p852013 Original Submittal Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 4 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25, 2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review future City park acquisition and development throughout the city, including the Glenwood Refinement Plan's proposed riverfront linear park and urban park blocks. Pedestrian access to these facilities will be by way of street-side sidewalks along Franklin Blvd with crosswalk connections at signalized intersections and connecting access to the riverfront multi-use pathway system. Communication Facilities US West Communications and a variety of other telecommunications providers offer communication services throughout the Eugene/Springfield Area. Public Schools Eugene School District is the k-12 education service provider in Glenwood. Given the above regarding public and private facility availability, this criterion is met. C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Response: Applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and how compliance is met with this proposal is as follows. CHAPTER 3- LAND USE DISTRICTS SECTION 3.4-200- GLENWOOD RIVERFRONT MIXED-USE PLAN DISTRICT 3.4-265 Base Zone Development Standards The following base zone development standards are established for the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District. Development Standard Office Mixed-Use Zone Minimum Development Area (1) 5 Acres Minimum Lot/Parcel Size None Minimum Street Frontage (2) None Minimum Lot/Parcel Coverage None Minimum Density(3) 50 du/net acre Built-to Lines/Building Setbacks Subsection 3.4-275H Landscape/Screening Setbacks Subsection 3.4-270F Minimum/Maximum Building Height Subsection 3.4-275D Additional Standards (4) (5) (6) (7) (1) Minimum Development Area. In the Franklin Riverfront, the minimum development area is necessary due to the number of small lots/parcels and the need to establish the local street grid and park blocks. In the McVay Riverfront, the minimum development area is necessary due to the number of small lots/parcels and in order to prevent piecemeal development of a number of large lots/parcels for compliance with Springfield Commercial and Industrial Buildable Lands Inventory, Economic Opportunities Analysis, and Economic Development Objectives and Implementation Strategies findings. EXCEPTIONS: (a) The developer may submit a letter to the Director stating that either abutting property owners are not willing to participate in the assembly of the minimum 5 acre development area; or there are smaller properties that cannot meet the 5 acre standard (for example, on the south side of Franklin Boulevard or on the west side of McVay Highway). (2) While there is no minimum frontage standard, all lots/parcels shall have frontage oneea�� public street unless the proposed development has been approved astnof a art- MVeer Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(3ti W82157203 nrininnl Suhmittal Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 5 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25, 2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review Plan, Site Plan or land division, and access has been guaranteed via a private driveway with an irrevocable joint use/access easement agreement as specified in Subsection 4.2-120A. (3) The density standard applies to high-density residential housing in those Subareas where this type of housing is required or permitted. See Subsections 3.4-2458.1.a. and 3.4-2458.2.b. There is no maximum density. (4) Where an easement is larger than the required setback standard, no building or above grade structure, except a fence, may be built upon or over that easement. (5) When additional right-of-way is required, whether by City Engineering standards, the Metro Plan (including the TransPlan), or the City's Conceptual Street Plan, setbacks are based on future right-of-way locations. Right-of-way shall be dedicated prior to the issuance of any building permit that proposes parking spaces. (6) Architectural extensions including but not limited to: cornices; eave overhangs; and porches and balconies extending beyond an exterior wall of a building may protrude into any 5-foot or larger setback area or build-to line by not more than 2 feet. Response: Minimum Development Area (1): The 5-acre minimum development area standard cannot be met due to the existing condition of numerous small lots along the south side of Franklin Blvd. Per the permitted EXCEPTION above in SDC 3.4-265(1)(a) the applicant hereby submits this "Letter" requesting the exception' (Ex#1) be granted. Minimum Street Frontage (2): Both lots of the subject site have street frontage. Minimum Density (3): As this request does not include a residential component, this standard does not apply. Build-to/Building Setbacks: Refer to findings in Subsection 3.4-275 below. Landscape/Screening Setbacks: Refer to Subsection 3.4-270 below. Minimum/Maximum Building height: Refer to Subsection 3.4-275 below. Additional Standards (4)(5)(6)(7): (4): There are no easements larger than the proposed building setback? (5): Additional Right-of-Way is not required.3 (6): There are no building extensions which protrude into a building setback. (7): There is no footnote (7) in the code. Given the above, this standard, 3.4-265, is met. 3.4-270 Public and Private Development Standards A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks. 1. Public Streets, alleys and sidewalks in the Glenwood Riverfront shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter and designed and constructed as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. ' There are a few exceptions requested in this proposal, each will be numbered;this is#1. • 2 There is an existing 25' ODOT Slope Easement which the city is working with ODOT to resolve. 3 While no additional ROW is required,the proposal includes a 10' ROW for future use if amts istii 1,ie',$eya. is rebuilt. I� r xct�'Cnnv^^c Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax I':'i')'6ZS6.52113 Original Submittal • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 6 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. The following is an overview of the Glenwood Riverfront street network: a. Franklin Riverfront Arterial Street. Franklin Boulevard shall be designed and constructed as a hybrid multi-way boulevard. Response: The applicable street is Franklin Blvd, a state highway and major arterial. It is fully developed to current standards. It is in compliance with the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter, the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies as specified in Appendix 3. We are asking for an exception (Ex #2) for the requirement to upgrade the frontage of the proposed development to comply with modern urban arterial design policies of Appendix 3 and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual because Franklin Blvd is still in the process of being redesigned and is years away from actually being constructed. In order to meet the requirements of the code we are granting a 10' Right of Way setback on the property which will allow the future construction of setback sidewalks, curbside planter strips and the undergrounding of utilities. Appendix 3 describes the corridor for Franklin Blvd abutting the subject property as: B.1.c....The corridor design envelope for the hybrid multi-way boulevard provides for alignment flexibility during final design to..provide design flexibility to minimize right-of-way impacts. B.1.c.2. Jenkins Drive to Glenwood Boulevard: The Corridor Envelope will narrow to approximately 110 feet west of the Glenwood Boulevard intersection, tapering to meet the facility cross-section within the 1-5 right-of-way. This section of the facility is planned as a modern urban arterial. As the subject site essentially abuts the 1-5 right-of-way to the west, the Franklin Blvd corridor at the subject property will be as the right-of-way is today. B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. Street trees, especially those that provide shade, and curbside planter strips in the public right-of-way shall be as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Therefore, street trees will not be subject to the regulations of this Section and will not be counted toward any landscaping required by this Section. As a general rule, street trees shall be selected on the basis of providing shade and have a size relationship with the street landscape (e.g., the wider the street, the larger the trees). Trees at least 40 feet tall at maturity are required for pedestrian areas. Design considerations shall be focused on space requirements of the selected trees at all phases of their life cycle. Scale, soils, underground obstruction, overhead constraints, branch height, mature tree size, and shadow patterns are examples of design considerations. Proposed tree species shall provide continuity between one site and the next in the same block. Street trees shall be placed either directly in planter strips or within tree wells located between the sidewalk and the curb as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Street trees and planter strips in the public right-of-way shall be shown on the required Site Plan. Response: The subject street, Franklin Blvd, is fully developed along the subject site frontage, including a curb-side sidewalk. Thus there are no planter strips and trees will be provided behind the sidewalk, outside of the right-of-way and on private property along the site's street frontage. A 10 Right of Way setbackl has been granted to-accommodate the ateReceived: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(591M62 58 7 2 013 Original Submittal_ • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 7 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25, 2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review future upgrading of the site frontage once the design and construction of Franklin Boulevard has been completed. A. Street Trees: Design plans for projects requiring street trees shall show the street tree locations in a shaded format on the street lighting plan to ensure street tree locations do not conflict • with street lights. Trees shall be at least 20 feet from decorative post top mounted streetlights, and 30 feet from cobra head streetlights. All locations will need to take into consideration Section I — DESIGN STANDARDS 6 - 2 EDSP Adopted December 03, 2012 the presence of overhead power when choosing street trees. Street trees shall not be planted in planter strips less than 4 feet wide. If the planter strip is less than 4 feet, tree placement shall be on the property side of the sidewalk. Tree wells set in concrete or sidewalk areas shall be a minimum of 4 foot x 4 foot. Street trees shall be planted at 30 foot intervals except where the planting interferes with traffic vision, street lighting, traffic signage, or public utilities, or as approved by the Street Supervisor, City Operations Division. When planting large canopy trees, tree spacing may be modified if approved by the City. See Appendix 6A — Approved Street Tree List for the approved street tree species. Response: There are no planter strips or tree wells; however a 10' right of way setback has been added to the site to accommodate future improvements including a setback sidewalk, planter strips, street trees and the undergrounding of utilities in order to comply with Franklin Boulevard Modern Urban Arterial design policies of Appendix 3 of the Glenwood Refinement Plan. With the current number of existing utility poles, cabling, overhead lines, signage, lighting, and vision clearance needs, opportunities for street trees are limited. The proposal includes street trees as shown on the attached plan set. The specified trees are included on the city's adopted street tree list. C. Lighting. 1. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. Decorative public street lighting and pedestrian level lighting, as may be permitted in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, shall be included with all new developments or redevelopment. 2. Private on-site lighting shall comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America recommended practices and shall: a. Be the minimum illumination necessary for a given application, including parking areas, as specified in Subsection 3.4-270G.9.d.; b. Be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property; and directed downward and away from abutting properties, public rights-of-way, and riparian zones, wetlands and other protected areas identified in this Code; c. Create a safe and secure environment for pedestrians and bicyclists during hours of darkness and reduce or prevent light pollution by minimizing glare; and d. Provide private on-site pedestrian level lighting, whether free standing or attached to a building. Private onOsite pedestrian level lighting is distinct from public street lights described in Subsection 3.4-270C.1. because it is intended to light private property rather than public streets. The height of a freestanding or attached light fixture shall be 12-14 feet and in no case shall exceed 25 feet or the height of the permitted building or structure, whichever is less. In this case, Da1It'e�JReceived: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 41h Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(bVIIM86$5d1IJI3 Original Submittal • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 8 of 18 Site Plan review-Written Statement June 25,2013-Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review height is measured as the vertical distance between the paved surface or finished grade and the bottom of the light fixture. Response: There is one existing public street light located at the northeast corner of Tax Lot 700. Private on-site lighting including pedestrian level lighting is as shown on the attached plan set. F. Private Property Landscape Standards. 3. General Landscaping Standards. a. Minimum Standards. The landscaping standards for the Glenwood Riverfront shall be minimums; higher standards can be substituted, provided all fence, wall or vegetation height limitations specified in this Section are met. Crime prevention should be considered when exceeding the landscaping standards because the height and density of vegetation may become a safety and/or visibility issue. b. Protection of Existing Vegetation. Existing vegetation may be used to meet the landscape standards if relocated on-site and/or protected and maintained during the construction phase of the development as specified in Subsections 3.4-270F.5. and 6. Any necessary tree felling shall comply with Section 5.19-100. c. Selection of Materials. Landscape materials shall be selected and sited to produce a hardy and drought-resistant landscape area. Selection shall include consideration of the soil type and depth; the amount of maintenance required; spacing; exposure to the sun and wind; the slope and contours of the site; and compatibility with existing native vegetation preserved on the site. Shrubs resembling trees shall not be used to meet the tree standards. d. Plant Diversity. L Shrubs. If there are more than 25 required shrubs, no more than 75 percent of them shall be of one species. it Trees. If there are more than 8 required trees, no more than 40 percent of them shall be of one species. If there are more than 24 required trees, no more than 25 percent of them can be of one species. This standard does not apply to existing trees that are counted towards meeting the total number of trees required. e. Specific Tree Standards. i. In any required landscape area, trees shall be suitable for this region as may be approved during the land use review process. At the time of planting, deciduous trees shall be a minimum 2 inches in caliper and permitted conifer trees shall be fully branched, between 4-6 feet in height. Spacing and time of coverage of trees shall be as specified in Subsection 3.4-270F.4. it The categories of trees are defined as follows: (a) Large trees in the public right-of-way or on private property are those trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity; (b) Medium-sized trees on private property are those trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall and 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity; and (c) Small or narrow-stature trees on private property are those trees less than 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity. f. Specific Shrub and Ground Cover Standards. i. All of the landscaped area that is not planted with trees and shrubs shall be planted in ground cover plants, which may include grasses. Mulch (as a ground cover) shall be confined to areas underneath plants and shall not be a substitute for ground cover plants. ii. All shrubs shall be of sufficient size and number to meet the required height and coverage standards of this Subsection within 4 years of planting, unless Date 11 p �� ``��Received: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(54.pjpp -$ fr 2U13 Original Submittal_._ • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 9 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25, 2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review otherwise specified in Subsection F.4. Shrubs shall be at least the one-gallon container size at planting. iii. Ground cover plants other than grasses or sod shall be: (a) At least the 4 inch pot size; (b) Planted in triangular spacing at distances appropriate for the plant species; and (c) Planted at a density that will cover the entire area within 3 years, unless otherwise specified in this Section. iv. Any plants listed on the Nuisance Plants List as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design and Procedures Manual shall be prohibited from being planted in the Glenwood Riverfront. g. Installation. h. Maintenance. i. Irrigation. The intent of this standard is to ensure that plants will survive the critical establishment period when they are most vulnerable due to lack of watering. All landscaped areas shall provide an irrigation system as follows: I. A permanent built-in irrigation system with an automatic controller; 4. Landscape Standard Categories. a. The L1 standard is a landscape treatment that enhances open areas between buildings and in required setbacks or screening areas specified in Subsection 3.4-270F.2.b.; and along pedestrian mid-block connectors. While primarily consisting of ground cover plants, the L1 standard also includes a mixture of trees, high shrubs, and low shrubs. The tree standard shall be one large tree per 30 linear feet, one medium tree per 22 linear feet, or one small tree per 15 linear feet for each 1,000 square feet of landscaped area. Trees of different sizes may be combined to meet the standard. Trees may be grouped. The shrub standard shall be either two high shrubs or three low shrubs for each 300 square feet of landscape area. The shrubs and trees may be grouped. Ground cover plants shall full cover the remainder of the landscaped area. The L1 standard shall comply with the vision clearance standards specified in Section 4.2-130. b. The L2 standard is a landscape treatment to screen different abutting uses and parking lots, utilities, and trash and recycling bin areas. The L2 standard shall be applied as specified in Subsection 3.4-270F.4.b.i along public streets and private driveway frontages where parking lots are permitted, specifically in Subarea D, south of the Union Pacific railroad trestle and outside of the nodal development area; common property lines and/or rear property lines; or at the interface of the linear park where there are no property lines. The L2 standard shall comply with the vision clearance standards specified in Section 4.2-130. The prescribed heights of required fences, walls or landscaping shall be measured from the actual adjoining level of finished grade. i. Separation of Uses. The L2 standard shall be designed to separate and mitigate the impact of abutting uses; and separate parking lots from public right-of-way and private common driveways to allow surveillance of the lot from the street or driveway, where visibility into areas is more important than a total visual screen. The intent is to partially conceal parked vehicles form public view. The L2 standard screening shall be set back 10 feet along the front property line and 7 feet along side and rear property lines, and driveways, where applicable. In this case, the L2 standard shall require: (a) Enough evergreen shrubs to form a continuous screen 3 feet high within 2 years of planting. The shrubs shall be properly maintained and shall be replaced with new shrubs when the screen ceases to serve the purpose of obscuring the view. (b) One large tree shall be required per 30 linear feet of landscaped area, one medium tree per 22 linear feet per landscape area or one small tree Date Received: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fa 17f_20fl Original Submittal,- • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 10 of 18 • Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review per 15 linear feet of landscaped area. Trees of different sizes may be combined to meet the standard. (c) Ground cover plants shall fully cover the remainder of the landscaped area. At least 10 five-gallon shrubs or 20 one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1,000 square feet of the required screening area. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn or other living ground cover. ii. Screening Utilities. Ground-mounted utility equipment including, but not limited to: exterior transformers; mechanical units such as condensers and generators; switch gear; backflow preventers; utility pads; cable television; and telephone pedestals shall be placed underground or within buildings, where practicable. When placed above ground, equipment shall be located to minimize visual impact and screened with either an enclosure that blends with the proposed building design; landscaping; or both. When enclosures area used, they shall be tall enough to completely screen the equipment at the time of the equipment installation. Groundcover and shrubs, planted tall enough to completely screen the equipment and any required cover, shall attain 50% coverage after 2 years and 100 percent coverage within 4 years. c. The L3 standard is a landscape treatment that applies within parking lots, including interior courts, but not including any required landscape setbacks necessary for screening, as specified in Subsection F.4.b.i. At least 10 percent of the interior of a parking lot shall be landscaped. The L3 standard serves three purposes; to eliminate storm water runoff through infiltration swales and other measures; to provide shade; and for screening. Water quality features may be incorporated into planter islands and required setbacks. The L3 standard shall comply with the vision clearance standards as specified in Section 4.2-130. i. Infiltration planter islands, infiltration planter basins between parking aisles, infiltration tree wells and required parking lot setbacks shall be used to accommodate storm water runoff as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. ii. Wheel Stops. Secured wheel stops or rubber parking blocks shall be placed to prevent vehicles from overhanging a landscape infiltration area or setback. Wheel stops shall be designed to allow runoff to enter the landscaped infiltration area. iii. L3 Standard— Trees. Trees of different sizes may be combined to meet this standard. In order to provide a canopy effect, one of the following options may be selected: (a) At a minimum, one large tree per 4 parking spaces; or (b) At a minimum, one medium tree per 3 parking spaces. iv. L3 Standard — Shrubs and Ground Cover Plants. At a minimum, one medium to small shrubs per space shall be required. The remainder of the area shall be planted in ground cover plants. 5. Existing Mature Vegetation and Healthy Trees, excluding those plants on the Nuisance Plants List as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design and Procedures manual, shall be retained to the maximum extent practicable. However, plantings shall intended to mitigate for the loss of natural resource values shall be subject to applicable standards as specified in Sections 3.4-280, 4.4-115, 4.4-117 and the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Response: Minimum Standards: The Proposed Planting Plan has been revised to meet the minimum L1, L2 and L3 standards as specified. Wheel stops have been added to prevent vehicles from overhanging all landscape areas. Date Receied: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fa (VM 28§43/Q13 Original Submittal • • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 11 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review Protection of Existing: Existing vegetation on the subject site consists of older, little- maintained residential landscape material, including trees, shrubs and lawn. This existing landscape material will not be retained as part of the project. An exception (Ex #3) is the area in the southern portion of the site that is within the wetland/riparian area and its setback. Except for where the proposed stormwater treatment swale is, existing landscape conditions will not be disturbed. Selection of Materials: Proposed landscape materials are those often utilized for urban landscapes in the southern Willamette Valley and are well suited for the weather, rainfall, sun and wind typically experienced. Plant Diversity: There are more than 25 required shrubs and no more than 75 percent will be of one species. Specific Tree Standards: Selected tree species are suitable for the local environment and urban conditions. Deciduous trees are specified at 2 inches caliper. Evergreen trees will be between 4 and 6 feet in height. Specific Shrub and Ground Cover Standards: All shrubs and ground covers are at least 1 gallon in size. Shrubs will meet their minimum height and coverage within 4 years and ground cover will cover its area within 3 years. Mulch is limited to area underneath plants and is not a substitute for ground cover. Installation and Maintenance: Installation and maintenance shall be as specified in the Code. Irrigation: A permanent, in-ground automatic irrigation system will be provided. G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards. 1. Vehicle/bicycle parking standards shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and the Housing and Economic Development Chapters. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Vehicle/Bicycle Parking Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. 3. Vehicle/bicycle parking and loading standards shall be designed and constructed as specified in this Subsection. 4. Vehicle Parking-General. Adequate vehicle parking shall be provided to support new development and redevelopment in the Glenwood Riverfront, while minimizing adverse visual, environmental, and financial impacts on the public. In line with the land use vision for compact development and a walkable, pedestrian-friendly environment, on-street parking, aboveground and underground off-street parking structures, and parking located within or under buildings shall be encouraged. Locating and designing all required vehicle parking to minimize the visibility of parked cars to pedestrians from street frontages and light and noise impacts of parking lots strengthens the character of the Glenwood Riverfront, reinforces the emphasis on pedestrian, bike, and transit for travel, and minimizes the potential for vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. 6. Maximum off-street vehicle parking spaces by use category shall be as specified in Table 3.4-1. 9. Vehicle Parking Design Standards. The following standards shall apply to all permitted parking facilities: a. In both public and private parking facilities, the stall width and length and aisle width standards specified in Section 4.6-115 shall apply. b. All surface parking lots shall incorporate the following elements including, but not limited to: ua1'ter� Receeived: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)6062577`013 Original Submittal_ • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 12 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review i. Pedestrian walkways that provide priority over vehicles routes, are direct and accessible, and enhance safety for pedestrians and vehicles. Parking lots with 50 or more spaces shall be divided into separate areas by landscaping or protected raised pedestrian walkways at least 10 feet in width, or by a building or group of buildings. Pedestrian walkways shall include pedestrian-scaled lighting as specified in Subsection 3.4-270G.9.d. and elevated crosswalks and/or distinguishing paving colors, textures or materials, as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The pedestrian routes shall lead to an entrance in the rear or, if applicable, the side of a building; ii. The use of alternative surfacing as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, including permeable surfacing , where applicable, shall be preferred as an option over traditional impervious surfacing; and Hi. Strategies to reduce "heat island" effects, such as canopy shade trees and landscaping as specified in Subsection 3.4-270F.4.c. c. Surface Parking Lot landscaping Standards. Parking lot landscaping shall be required as specified in Subsections 3.4-270F.4.b. and c. d. Surface parking lot lighting shall be provided as specified in Subsection 3.4- 270C.2. and may be a mix of bollards at ground level and pedestrian-level lighting. e. Vehicle parking shall not be allowed within any required or optional building setback specified in Subsection 3.4-2751-1. 11. Vehicle Parking Access and Driveways. a. In Subareas A, B, and C, vehicle access to a parking lot or parking structure shall be from a service street, alley, or, where there is no service street, other local street in order to minimize the impact of auto parking and driveways on the public pedestrian environment. Each block face fronting a service street, alley or other local street necessary for vehicle access shall be limited to one curb cut. c. Curb cuts for all parking lots or parking structures shall be constructed to maintain the elevation, appearance and continuity of sidewalks crossed by the curb cuts. 13. Bicycle Parking. Safe and convenient bicycle parking shall be provided for residents, visitors, employees and patrons. In mixed-use developments, the required bicycle parking for each use shall be provided. Required off-street bicycle parking spaces shall be as specified in Table 3.4-2. The required minimum number of parking spaces for each listed use is 4 spaces. Response: All parking is provided off-street, in landscaped and screened interior courts located directly behind the building and in adjacent Tax Lot 100. Parking is screened from adjacent uses as well as the public realm of Franklin Blvd by both the proposed hotel and the required L2 and L3 landscape standard planting areas. Per table 3.4-1, the maximum parking requirement is 95 spaces (one space for each bedroom (85) plus one space for each employee on the largest shift (10)). 86 spaces have been provided, including 4 accessible spaces in compliance with ADA. Parking stall dimensions meet the requirements of 4.6-115. Pedestrian walkways are as shown on the attached plan set. Lighting is as shown on the attached plan set. Parking does not encroach into any setbacks. Covered bicycle parking is provided near the main entrance to the hotel. 5 spaces are required and 5 spaces are provided. H. Wastewater Facilities and Services. 2. Private Wastewater Facilities... for any proposed new or expanded use the developer • shall provide for a suitable connection to the public wastewater sytynx.y Received: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541))' 5 2013 Original Submittal • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 13 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review Response: The proposal includes a connection to the existing public system as shown on the attached plan set. 1. Stormwater Facilities and Services. All new development, redevelopment and associated infrastructure in the Glenwood Riverfront shall manage stormwater runoff on- site to provide for water quality treatment and groundwater recharge, to the maximum extent practicable. Response: On-site stormwater will be directed to a new on-site stormwater treatment facility as shown on the attached plan set. Given the above, this standard, 3.4-270, is met. 3.4-275 Building Design Standards The following standards are established for the Glenwood Riverfront portion of the Willamette Greenway (WG) Overlay District: C. Building Facades. The design of buildings and their relationships to the public realm are critical factors in the development of an active and vital pedestrian environment. In all Subareas building facades shall have the following architectural detailing: 1. The ground floor of a building shall utilize all of the following: a. Incorporate awnings, canopies, porticos, or arcades; b. Provide variation in building materials including, but not limited to: tile, brick, split-faced concrete block, concrete horizontal siding, masonry veneer, and powder coated aluminum or traditional wood storefronts that are differentiated by, trim, paint, and ornamentation; c. Utilize ground floor windows and entrances that provide a high level of transparency by allowing views both inward and outward;and d. Utilize signs; or other features, including public art. 2. The upper stories shall utilize all of the following, as applicable: a. Include architectural detailing utilizing some of the same design elements specified in Subsection 3.4-275C.1.; b. Incorporate a change in the window style; c. Integrate a change in floor height; building step backs, as specified in Subsection 3.4-275D.4.; or a combination of these elements; and/or d. Provide differences in height and architectural elements including, but not limited to: parapets, cornices and other details that may be used to create interesting and varied rooflines. In addition, building corners may incorporate taller elements including, but not limited to: towers, turrets, and bays. 3. More than one type of building material may be used for building identity. 4. Building facades that do not front a street, alley or mid-block connector shall be constructed with design elements similar to those facades fronting streets. Response: As shown on the attached plan set, the ground floor of the building incorporates awnings, variety in building finish texture and color, and contains a number of windows. The upper floors follow this same theme, with variations in finishes, articulation and ample windows. D. Height. The following standards are intended to: allow for a range of building heights within a development area; support an interesting skyline and the ability to market view properties; and reduce impacts of shading from tall structures on the public realm. Lower structures combined with taller structures within a single development area will be permitted to allow for a variety of design solutions. y gib 1. In all Subareas, the minimum building height shall be 2 stories�abaoye made. ed: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4t Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•FFan )286.43 Original Submittal • . Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 14 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review 2. In all Subareas, there shall be no maximum building height. 4. In Subareas A, B and C, step backs that are a minimum of 15 feet wide shall be required beginning at the fourth story of a building and after each additional 3 stories. Uses for the lower roofs may include, but not be limited to balconies and observation decks. 5. In all Subareas, non-residential ground floor space (commercial/office/light manufacturing businesses) shall have a minimum floor to floor height of 15 feet to accommodate space for mechanical systems. Response: The proposed building is greater than 2 stories. The height limit is not an issue. We are asking for an exception (Ex #4) in regards to the requirement for the building step backs beginning at the 4'" story and an exception (Ex#5) to the 15 foot floor to floor height of the ground floor. We are requesting an exemption because as a franchise, Candlewood Suites has a prescribed architectural identity and is not being created new specifically for this particular site. It is the franchise's desire to preserve the consistency of this architectural identity as shown on the attached drawing set shown as 'Requested Franchise Elevation' and not alter the design of the building. In lieu of step backs beginning with the fourth floor, the hotel utilizes an L-shape configuration combined with facade articulation to achieve a similar effect. In the event that the City will not consider an exception to this standard, the attached plans also show an alternate elevation labeled as 'North Elevation, Franklin Boulevard' for consideration. E. Massing/Building Articulation. Where buildings are highly visible from public areas, massing shall be addressed by articulating the facades with insets and projections to create visual interest and enhance views from the adjacent public realm. Response: The proposed building includes articulation on all sides, including projections, repeated window patterns, variations in roof lines and changes in building finishes. We are requesting an exemption as noted above that might be required to further meet the Massing/Building Articulation requirement because as a franchise, Candlewoods Suites has a prescribed architectural identity and it is not being created new specifically for this particular site. It is the franchise's desire to retain their prescribed architectural identity as shown on the attached drawing set labeled as 'Requested Franchise Elevation'. In the event that the City will not consider an exemption to this standard, the attached plans also show an alternate elevation labeled as 'North Elevation, Franklin Boulevard' for consideration. F. Windows and Doors. 1. Ground floor windows and doors that face a public street, alley or mid-block connector. The following standards apply to primary entrances to buildings: c. In Subarea C, commercial and office windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 60 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of a building's first floor facades to allow views into lobbies, merchandise and work areas and allow persons inside to look out. 2. Upper story windows that face a public street, alley or mid-block connector. In all Subareas, upper story windows shall be required on all building facades and shall comprise a minimum of 25 percent of the length of the building's fagade for each story. 3. In all Subareas, the use of low-reflective glass shall be encouraged as an energy conservation method. Date ff Recei�ved: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fa)(5.h)Z3§-47413 Z3§-47413 t13 Original Submittal • • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 15 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25, 2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review 4. In all Subareas, frosted glass, spandrel windows, and other types of glass or film coatings between 3 feet above the sidewalk grade to 8 feet above the building slab that diminish transparency on the ground floor shall be prohibited. Response: Upper story windows facing Franklin Boulevard comprise 25 percent of the building length. Low-reflective glass is encouraged and frosted or other film coatings are not proposed. An exception (Ex #6) to the first floor requirements for the amount of windows is being requested because as a franchise Candlewood Suites has a prescribed architectural identity and is not being created new for this particular site. It is the franchise's desire to retain their prescribed architectural identity as shown in the attached drawing set labeled as 'Requested Franchise Elevation'. In the event that the City will not consider an exception to this standard, the attached plans also show an alternate elevation labeled as 'North Elevation, Franklin Boulevard' for consideration. G. Orientation/Entrances. 1. In all Subareas: a. Primary entrances to all new buildings located on a street, alley or mid-block connector shall be designed to include at least 3 of the following design elements: an awning, canopy, overhang, or arch above the entrance; recesses or projections in the building fagade surrounding the entrance; a peaked roof or raised parapet structures over the door;or display windows surrounding the entrance. Primary entrance design elements attached to buildings shall be: L At least 9 feet above the sidewalk or grade; ii. Suspended from the building rte. not supported by posts or columns that may interfere with pedestrian traffic); Response: The project's primary entrance does not face a street, alley or mid-block connector. However, in order the meet the requirements of the code the building has been revised to include an entry on Franklin Boulevard with a pedestrian connection to the Public Right of Way. Efforts have been made to create a safe, appealing and comfortable street environment which includes pedestrian level lighting, wayfinding signage, benches and trash receptacles, a plaza, planting beds, and a canopy above the entrance which is suspended from the building and is a minimum of 9 feet above the sidewalk. H. Build-to Lines and Building Setbacks. 2. Building Setbacks. a. In Subareas A, B, C, and the portion of D north of the Union Pacific railroad trestle and within the nodal development area, buildings maybe setback a maximum of 10 feet behind the build-to-line. This standard will still allow the establishment of a pleasant and diverse experience by providing additional pedestrian amenities. Pedestrian amenities shall be addressed as specified in Subsections 3.4-2751.2.a. and b. Exception: In Subareas A, B, and C, ground floor entrances of buildings fronting Franklin Boulevard may be setback a minimum of 4 feet behind the build-to-line and windows and walls may be setback a maximum of 1 foot 6 inches. Pedestrian amenities shall be addressed as specified in Subsection 1.2.a. Response: We are meeting the requirements of the code because Franklin Boulevard is currently undergoing a long term planning process and it is not yet clear what Franklin Boulevard will look like at the end of the process; As a result of thi unce` ainty we are Date Received: Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(J V ft 8L U 7Lo13 Original Submittal J • Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 16 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25,2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review granting the city a 10' Right of Way Setback in order to meet the code and accommodate the future planning of Franklin Boulevard as a 'modern urban arterial'. The 10' right of way setback allows for future setback sidewalks, street trees and planter strips and the undergrounding of utilities as well as accommodating the existing water main. Furthermore, the 10' right of way setback better accommodates the shape and size of the Candlewoods Suites which has a prescribed architectural identity. L Pedestrian Amenities. 2. Pedestrian Amenities Standards. The pedestrian standards are minimums. The developer is encouraged to provide additional pedestrian amenities. a. Where there is no building setback, the following coordinated pedestrian amenities shall be provided on each block or development area, as applicable, located between the curb and the build-to-line: i. At least one bench for every 80 feet of street frontage; ii. At least one trash receptacle for every 80 feet of street frontage; and iii. At least one pedestrian-scale wall mounted light meeting the standards specified in Subsection 3.4-270C.2. for every 50 feet of street frontage. b. Where there is a building setback, in addition to the pedestrian amenities specified in Subsection 3.4-2751.2.a., two additional pedestrian amenities from the list specified in Subsection3.4-2751.2.c., shall be provided for each 80 feet of street frontage. c. Additional pedestrian amenities include, but are not limited to: i. Sitting space (e.g., outdoor seating areas for restaurants, benches, garden wall or ledges between the building entrances and sidewalk); ii. Building canopy, awning, pergola, or similar weather protection (minimum projection of 4 feet over a sidewalk or other pedestrian space); iii. Transit shelters; iv. Information kiosks; v. Sidewalk displays; vi. Drinking fountains; vii. Wayfinding signage for pedestrians consisting of a distinctive logo and directional guidance to neighborhood destinations; viii. Planting beds, hanging flower baskets, large semi-permanent potted plants, and/or ornamental planters; ix. Pedestrian-scale lighting either free standing or attached to the face of the building as specified in Subsection 3.4-270C.2. for every 50 feet of street frontage; x. Decorative pavement patterns and tree grates; xi. Decorative clocks; xii. Public art sculpture, statues, murals, or fountains; xiii. Bicycle racks; xiv. Stands selling flowers, food or drink, as may be permitted by the Springfield Municipal Code; and xv. Entry steps, porches and front gardens for residential mixed-use buildings. 3. The 80 foot spacing standard in Subsection 3.4.27512.a., above may be flexed, and pedestrian amenities may be grouped or placed closer than this standard as long as the quantity of amenities meets the minimum requirements and the spacing averages 80 feet along the street frontage. Response: The proposed building is setback. Thus pedestrian amenities are provided. These include: Wall mounted pedestrian lighting, plaza, plant beds, (2) benches and (2) trash receptacles, wayfinding signage and a building canopy at t entrance on, Franklin Boulevard. Date Received : JUN 267013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 41h Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 Original Submittal • • Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 17 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25, 2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review J. Screening Roof-Top Mechanical Equipment. Visual impacts of mechanical equipment shall be located and/or screened so they are not visible from adjacent public and private streets or adjacent residentially zoned property. Acceptable screening includes: raising the parapet on all sides of the building to be as high as the highest mechanical unit or vent on the roof or a secondary roof screening system designed to be as high as the highest mechanical unit or vent on the roof. Secondary roof screening systems shall be enclosed groups of units rather than a box around each unit, incorporated into the design of the building, and constructed with materials that are compatible with those of the building. Mechanical equipment also shall be sited and shielded to protect adjacent uses from noise impacts. Response: Roof-top equipment will be screened from view with raised parapets located on all sides of the building. 3.4-280— Willamette Greenway Standards The subject site is outside of the Willamette greenway and this criterion does not apply. D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been located and designed to promote vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian safety. Vehicle access is at the northeast corner of Lot 100 and does double-duty in providing access from the right-of-way to both tax lots. Thus only one access/driveway to the Franklin Blvd corridor. Pedestrian safety is ensured with the provision of a sidewalk from the site access/driveway to the hotel entrance, bicycle parking location and parking area. Connections to transit stops are provided with the existing street- side sidewalk along Franklin Blvd. Driveways on the arterial are further minimized with the provision of secondary access through the shared access driveway to the east across Lot 500. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as maybe specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Response: The subject site is in an urban environment, with over 100 years of settlement and human disturbance. Physical features are limited to the southern portion of the site which contains a WQLW facility — the North Channel of the Glenwood Slough. As shown on the enclosed attachments (Attachments 10 and 11), the slough is a jurisdictional wetland/riparian corridor and includes a 50-foot setback. The enclosed plan set documents the presence of the resource and the setback. III. Attachments A. Attachments The following attachments are provided to assist staff in evaluating the application: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2 —Warranty Deed - 1950 Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 Original Submittal Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 18 of 18 Site Plan review—Written Statement June 25, 2013—Re-Submittal in Response to Completeness Review Attachment 3— Indenture of Access— 1962 Attachment 4—Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road — 1962 Attachment 5—Application and Permit for Access—2000 Attachment 6 —Special Warranty Deed -2007 Attachment 7 — Preliminary Title Report— Lot 700 Attachment 8—Stormwater Management System Scope of Work Attachment 9—Stormwater Management Report Attachment 10—Wetland Delineation and DSL Letter of Concurrence Attachment 11 —Wetland and Wetland Buffer Diagram Attachment 12—Candlewood Suites Sign Information and Diagrams Attachment 13—Geotech Report Attachment 14— Preliminary Title Report— Lot 100 Attachment 15— Preliminary Title Report— Lot 200 IV. Conclusion Based on the information contained in this written statement, the applicant believes that the requested Site Plan Review can be approved. If there are any questions regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to contact Rick Satre, AICP, at Schirmer Satre Group, 541-686-4540 or rick(dischirmersatre.com. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 • Original Submittal Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4(h Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 1 a il u»wa v I _` :�_: MOH"Nine P9 ...w lablelliMIN eserfanwpme• mow.111~1 i6nliwgnS IBui6!Jp EIOZ 9 Z ■$11 I :paAp098 aiep CI Z WI w i J 4"■ 5smsI a �71171 4, f 'r --- „ _ ,-- \'•'.\ 35 0 5 9.115 i _,---.1 ri r. As._E g - puzIs -_ '� - 40 JO<t5;in nil 1'1 Hi.:_.-_-- -cr, - V _--, ��� 11 ....., Franklin Blvd \Os .410,---- • -.'N ------- c4 -"'"'0. c.) '• . i 11 -'1 c) . NI firf I: 0 0 ' ate �a66nN _- i a b is urtpooi 4D 15 p,owo] l {iC • H? 3 any!dd!ssrssm \ ' a ® �f a, IQ -v.., C t ' L , 1 L _ N Henderson bwe ig, '[J W if - `Tr P++IS pool:malnn _ �` cc c,.. em 11 .c Cgt. ‘„,. 3 J 411111 -a ----- Ja p!H loin" __ s, t'; - l0 1 4110 .__ �------ i Fes, _.------ r —_ _____-- - - m,' J ._ -i5 eisn6nv UJ 1 / -LiL,---- 35 Maivan�d c it I ! 35 uenlrt5---' , . ,-• ' , -- ( biis IoIStJB JO lsa�- ` Jp,rB _ cal M " aco �o d v 1c J'uo v C. vi ___� i , .• i ler �. I: f _ 0 44 I- ce & ',. zi I —f 1 f I AaliV inuleM 1 Zi IS pley3�p — r f IV'� ^ rtallV PJe �Q • -c- c. tr • • Attachment '2' r WARRANTY DEED a 4;ar 139 ffibf%Ztlbtntutt gattincatth.rbat...we,...Janes.Bavae..snt..Audi'ay..uaydp...•p 0A-kAMl............ . .. F..� C.!. ......'.......,AMAMI F:v..007Aa,.,.bnahanit4A4..Witco.....__..... .. ... . ..... ....grentorP for the consideration of s:, f the sum of_. -Due:and.DO/].00.....(81Ja0)...and_athar.xaLLLblei.con T. siderstion..-. ..-.-:tr.DOLLARS .h '• Sj. i� }. to...-..._ua_. ......_..............psf4 ha we bargained and sold and by theca pnrycenla do...,bargain,evil and convey '„_, unto the STATE OF OREGON.by and through its&!ATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION,the following described ':•ii premises.to wit; -''';• I1 I.: A parcel of lahi lying in the Zara Sweet D. L. O. 9 68, oleo in the Southeast It, quarter (SO}) of filiation 33, Township 17 South, Range 3 West, H. H., lane Comity, !r! Al Oregon, the said parcel being described as follows; Deginning at s point on the. Westerly line of that tract of land convey.d to the s --,,' State of Origon by and through ito State Highway Commission, by that deed recorded + . i;.: . in Book 234, Page 292 of Lane County Dead Records; eui4 point being opposite and 170.5 I' feet distant Southerly from (when measured at right angina to) the tint•:r me li of the r:::: Psoifia Highway at Engineers Station 195+53.5, said Paint also being 560.9 feet South r:::: and 1291.5 foot Vest of the Northeant corner of the Zara Sweet D. L. C. P 68; thane° 1:•,' South 7211 111 300 Went 379.69 feet to the existing highway right of way line; thence , along said right of way line North 15e 581 30” West 45 feet; and North 7Z°111 30" rh �F.,. East 380 fatty thence South 15° 341 30" Eaot clang the Westerly line or said State sd property, 45 fast to the point of beginning. The parcel of lend to which this doeoription applies contains 0.39 acre, I. .3 As an essential part of this tiansaotion, we, the undereigned, as the owners ' , . ra in tee pimple of the twit of land ahrttiog m the Pacific Righway, as described 1 1 • in twist certain deed, wherein James Hayes and Audrey L. Hayes won grantees, re- corded in volume 124, Page 160, volume 120, Page 593, Volume 129, Pogo 594, volume `',:,,: 137, Page 334, and Volume 140, Page 69, Deed Retards of Lane County, Oregon, of which the real property covered by this deed is a part, do, for ourselves, our heirs 11:. • and assign, sell, tr°nnfnr, convoy and relinquish to rte State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Comieofon, ito successors and a,oi ,s, forever, all •(,:- easement of access and all rights of ingress, egress end regrets, to from and botwaen an the real property described in said recorded deed and the above daeignatsd highway. . I{I{ EXCEPT, there is rsaervsd the right of access Tim said abutting land to said I').. highway of a width not to exceed 25 root on the South aide thereof opposite lildhvay , hlrginearls Station 199e86; said aooeee to be for ordinary trawl to and from the atoll abutting land only and all not bo used•in connection with any cam,rcisl institution 1.ii, or activity established or conducted on the adjoining property, which, in any manner, caters to, invites, eolioits them or is dependent upon the users of tali highway. . Grantee, State of Oregon, shall have the right at its option to build at any . future time at it, sole east, an outer highway within the right of way. !yon eon- otruotion of such outer highway all right of totters to and from the highway, if arty be herein epeeifioially reserved, shall Beane, but grantors, their heirs and ensign, shall hays attest to the outer highway. Said outer highway shall be connected to the main highway only se such point or points as the as the State of Oregon may designate.'' . It Se expressly Intended that thump novonante, burdens and reatriotiono shell run with the land and shall forever bind the grantors, their heirs and assigns, ' 1 • • • Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal___ • • /get 448 tEki.9! ��' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD tho said premises with their appurtenance;In far aimyle,unto the mid Mate of Oregon,try and through its Stale Highway gmwalsslen,Its aueemeon and assign.tamer. And..._uL.�.the said grantor sdo...hereby revenant to rind with the said Stale of Oregon,by and li. through Ita Mato Hlg:.woy Commission.It.memoirs and assigns,ibis.._.._JII.Iaq..___._... .the owrwr...i t', ` L':: in he Ample of mid gumtree;than they are free tram all hwumbnmen el and tint. . .. . ... ....fl warrant and defend the name from all lawful claims whatsoever. IN WITHYJ.F W IIY,1IE1W�.. ye .. .....hem her mono ad .ot7s' .. . .hand.A.trod matt, j i. rhi. %Y .tiny nt �}_,-,-+vL- ...... .,H... c nom:inlwr:ntrr of: 1, ' 1, 1 � tf'?Le-g' ?' . .. (SEAT) ,. .e ... e. ,ui ...[ecA41 • Pu Q • ti ..1 • STATE Or IME:0OJ1 _I • p sµ . Cnontyrd rx^!r�-n- , th1 ihu ,'/ Arvid }9-_ c ..../- .la 50,p nnually enure before mo. a IIOCAry.F.wb11e.. .. .. .. ..in end tar mid ermnly a d stale,the within named : :, Jana Rayon . mui AEON.liEme, aloe„knmfn,ae 441,7...$1411501. In Inn peunally known in be the klrnllcal pnm.d dryeribrd le,sand who angle&the within Indrumwd. t. mat who with pv inane ac)<newtsdgert In me that they exnidml the mine freely and rnlunloriy for tha ume raid nominee(bomb genial •• r-\ Wilmot my hand nail officio)mot the day and yin?tutt Pion wrllttt r .7 • w..., arw IWOn aydrw_ .H.'-r'- / F A.e .rte • i t ttihil I itSi ' . .a e - T: -ived: JUN 262013 8t�ginpt calt,mittal — • 9064 . •L'• PL RA__Am AND SALM MD n.. : 11118 MEM= wIIIMSSZTO, that the STAYS Of 018,0011, by one through its State ...,:-• ? Rtghey Oosdesion,•tor the oeneidarstion of the eta of Oea sad 00/100 (01.00) v �:t I-„ '• Dollar and other valuable osdderstton to it paid, ha bargained and sold end . S,. lt oa , sell and omrey unto Jaws Nemo and Audrey L. Ire these promote dose lrergdn ..5, `r Omen, husband and wife, the foliating described prmisee, to vitt A parcel of land lying in Zara Swat D. L. 0. 068 also is to Southeast porter (as-}) of Scotian 93, Tomah* 17 Soot&1 Range 3 Meet, R. N., Lane County, Oregon, the said parcel being deearlbed as folloves •• pegf tlg st s point on tb Westerly line of tint treat °t lane m1 conveyed to the State of Oregon, ly and OWough its State Oow .'� atssion by that Met nomad in;tot 25k Page 292 of la satin tit Deed '; ' Records; said point being opposite and 176.5 feet distant Southerls from (whim swarmed at right mess to) the canter lbw of the Pacific Nighty at Augiasn'■ Station 195183.$1 said point also being 560.0 feet South and 1291.5 feet Meet of the Sort eset earner of the Zara Sweet D. L. 0. 0.6d; theme South 16°90' Prat along sold Weaned, •1 property line 28.7 feet to an axle eaddng the Southwst orbit of said $'1 • : property; theme South 72° 50' Seat along the Boutb'Y line of said i .: ' , property 220.6 foot; them forth 36°30' west along the Sisterly line t of Mid property 155.15 feet; thence South 720 111 301 Vest Id3.5 feet t qr to the point of beginning. ] - . The parcel of land to which ;hie description applies contains 0.39 t i ' sera. +' 4. Provided, hoverer, there is =Opted and reserved to the grantor, .. and wain and relinquished MM. grantee, all rights of access between , the above described real property and the right of my of the psbtto highway Butting =the Northerly Bide thereof, iditah pohlic high vey '1'.: for the prposs of ideatifiaation is designated as the Mafia IDghwy, ' • • being State DIShtey NO. 1. This reservation andheraaption stall rum i with the land end shall not be Rubles; to noditioation, eenoe latian or destootion ty adverse usage or estoppel no atter how long motioned.Nothing in this conveyance contained shall be 000rbroed as conveying am estate, right, -title or interest lo and to the public high ay right of , j • • may nor any or reveratoa therein or thereto. This 'conveyance th • onsaoe is made, executed. and delivered upon the grounds • and for the reason that the real property ha»laabave Mooribed is no 1 • • ' longer needed, required, or geofnl for Mghwoy purpoesa. t • •t t Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal jf51a',, }:tie, t .S.44t1 404\ dLe• : 1:.CD{n4ti;AV Vr i, a 7t-,{_ , i�.. ", .,_.____1,,c, ,_.__ I�Bt r;f D�sA.it .8ahn Jot f it` .�,Nye, 4 vsy tlosiieiioa� L.. woaad';the swam't,wia�e►on 6e . idifS',ed�and t�t:►�`,r1'11;',, ., S . presents to M aoienuted nn du the _`// Mny;e! "—t;Y 1950. "1:1:-.7!:.,te ",,ni1® ,• 4..• rep t ((�,!' `re" new; n anus, ^. •ia[0 r. ,!r!!. dhor ;L • ip ii' _a. als 1.arice% • 0, r-'i, STA= OF Q!' ON as t, q',:: County of : i^ !r. 41^.;, On this• /!�,day of a 1950, before re appeared '.>: Ben 11. Olaadler, Ohio. N. S yno and K. Metter to no peraoaally hecwa, vM each blies duly acorn, did APT that he,the said pee It. Cheadle,if Chairmen at the State SiBhvgy Cow,teetoa of the State of Dragon. end that b,. t f::. the said Chore, 8. Ronald* end ha the said M. K. Marva', it Sttta:IB,BhY,,y. ,,++ Oeaainionar of the State of Oregon; that the seal affixed to sdd:Sdatkoeent .2. Se the Veal of the State IQebimy Coaatesion, MI that the said I,utlruaah is piped and waled in WWI of said State b said Oo®iseloa, and that'the said :, .: 1 i. Chairnan and the said Oomiasionore oakum said inetrment to be the tree sot and deed of said State, by paid State IQg Onaaission. ' .'; 'n� IS TEEM mT MIVIEOF I hero hereunto est ip hand and affixed ay official •r'• '. anal the day and year last stove written. ` " / , loary n for ae 'r l It eteain expires' 5r,....4 xi /9d/'n I j . gr IL r ; �. i' !`' : fib l 7/ / •t jr r:, . t r,? r Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Subrltaal. Attachment '3' 'I 4 'n L (t a,-s J :.:---eco�z i rr•u..ti- In... ..1 y :; d ` ::-...""•••••:::. ! • , J78,c1a • r .66"778 : •...;••••••t.. 7ue No f�., ,, . te•.. 3aDgR1UnE A AD®8 '..Y. iii+ I q r n + s . e. 71178.IjalwTURa, aSde tad malted this Sr.! day•of' 4 1{ :t' i 1962, by and Valium:. MI S206 W(87007, by aM through at Mtata.ldigiq.y. , .:, -.isle, ...CemLaion, hereinafter oalld 'otkte,a and JAII&4-HL and AI�ORII�W.Y771 ' i + _ rye : ' huehand and wits,.herelalft.r called oCtmers.a . . •" .. ' '. ..• L. f • ,t WIILWB, State acquired from James Hays• end Audrey'/Hayn, husband and Y" _ T.' + . . 'r wife.by warranty deed executed en June 29, 1930, reemd0d'dn Volvos dl.( . S. 1 • ' Page,109 of the Died Rmarda of Sane County, certain property lying'in the 4;;;1:1•.'•)i...• : + .i:c` - •outhvitterly quarter of Section 33, township 17 south, Range 3 Hest,11•N••• ..•t,••. a::: - :+, Lane County, Oregon; an ° . i ....ones, 4 A '• WOW, acid deed reserved to the grantor.mama to the galenite'High-'. *qt.... ever at Noe Yost. 037. ymgfnesr+a Station 19986, on the,southerly side there-, r.„ of, for ordinary travel to and from the abutting Sod. et.CM grantors marl •.? nt t- BI HHBAS, State, by resolution Bade on the 31.t day of July, 1937, add ` entered instate reveres as Throughways and Right. of Aimee R.•olution No. ' W, provided that in certain Instances restrictions open uee of soviet points y+, 1 ,i , ,^ 4 could be removed and unlimited use could thereafter be made of the ammo l ' r., points{ and - - W}1M3AS,Resolutien.he farther provided.that the Amer. should P5714'ad. . . 1.:20,4:J.,......,-,.,-,:?..:-.:' : nvanes to State the estimated mount.of the coat of ooantrnotinng snob saoelera• lion and deceleration lanes as are needed for the safety of the traveling pub- .,' : lio{ a ._, d , M1 r ! .''-. • 1g®ZAe, maid-Resolution di provided further that State could, at.any r;.,. ”' • ' time, maltreat or albinism provide a troutage Red or roads within the bouts r oriel of any present or hernttei acquired right of wary, whereupon all rights ' : �. • 5 .'. .• . . . ' it•• .M_ ..-. -_. .. s_._ et . eRe, eived' t , ' ,JIJN 2'6.2013 �'' 4 II � ,si.+�.:..yt�r;9^^." - -"�.-i_tv';'w"•�.'r .tv�{1�1�,,r-�a+F�DtAVrp1±.M }�'tl•4 , 1 1 •ii � . .'. a 1 .1•• { . . 1 j it + .t• i' 1 :...:� :•:,-;z•,,...... t 1 ; a ..,:c‘2.114.2-.% ^ ?' : +4i �'� t , . na.t ,k if , w:° _ -_. f . " allill11111111111111111111111111111111111111111i ' • --t-i"t"--'-'''''-'-'aci-------i--•"---r"-'-'--;--;-=4--)-,---- -"..- ..., ..-.. _.''''":•..'''.,"."'.2 "*---= ':.:-Zr.""."'.'...:.-.:7=- -t- 2:1"-;;f4;-"Iffn'tt;z4Zrit:‘,--rtr..1:4tj:^11•=------1- :2ZiXten-h-c-ie,-‘7,1'1'-"":•.•:•:::"- , -,1- .-.:-- ,'.-•-. -2,t-.•---- --------.-r,-..-- .--. ,.....,:„._____.... ..._._..:.....-..A.a.-,...,....... .707-^. .------ - ------";- ,- .-.■..,* 1..'....t- -.-.....,=7.-"''- ,--,','",..--,•,.4'.t."..7r.U”'.'1 -. -4•Avcr.rat----.7‘.,,-,..-..,-.c,-.;•1:7...s...11-,--..,..7-rn-r...,.-..-.-.:-...,!,:i.,:i•Ore,.V.:C.'■ :',:".,:s...:::::”.....,-.7 3.....ty.-...,.. ...,,,,-..w.it2.6.4.41,:,,,,,, -nt-c4v.1.4-.6-:,)-4.1-0.--:...-Acr.n.vhva,,L,r.,Y,..".e t,,a.,-......1`.,..,,,,.......t;.-7...7.4,2,.,,e,".-..t-..,V3-,:al'n'. '' - "s±-1.'r.','Z' '''' 7,-......•'1; :-: 4 C1..„:..,. •- ..... .- . I::,‘,.:......e.i.':,,. '.....;!"'/.."......:';%‘,..'1"''.".•'•50v.S.:.,‘..,'. . , • ••..... ' 7• •-•. ••. •;$u .:' .',...'.•••::-.', '*'''';' 4,'="•):."1".:" 'I's ...qta• .. - • 1 .,.• .. . .• ;..•..'. • . • . ,. • • .:•:,•C•,:Y1.:.;':..:••'-.1 l'-',...:•" - .1 •:. i;lit;tit..10tioire'would'ban daltaind n team, to the frontage road Or ..'.:•,...;,,,..7:: '.:?...i;...1,:..:;.:.;:.• ‘...•-1:1....C••. •, .. •:' •• . •: • •.- '.:. '.'• .f ." ;it':::;;Z•••::,54.C.4. 1,?....:i7.4•1. . ‘" • .• '.UMW;ihii-ittina et thitnetanes where Seardution;.:Wo,if,a appliee..... ...,. .... in,..., „.41....,...,.4. —1.----r-..-“"'4:::' • . -- •tr•and the'jut restriction on the scone point an be converted,to an unto-. . ..,. . _. tr...r.f.....,77;,...74,.. "::-.:-:,-17::;.;:''''.'7. - •. .- otrieted or ;Ai:sited use Man the aihianoe payment of.the estiated onto , ' .1: ,; L.;:/,'.;;;.•::: ..1; ,;,..*.;....,.-. ..,. of the.4Aeirdeltian a thcansterstion and desalination tithes' and i,. ; . J.:. ., I • • • WEIMIL413,,the Owner. Ian tecinetod that tin use restrictions on their. •.. !...2.-.,'. .''".. ';':. -••. :r.'':•./:;::'':- :::•,-:''-, , .: ;'' . . • ' 'point of access oppoiito Highway Engineerie Station 199+S6 be mowed end d;?;•,;.:7:• •;.;.e.:':74 V. thatthe width of said access:in increased from.25 tette 4, toot, and thef -..z:,...?;.^:■-.,::;;:;.'2,-.•:.■,. ... ' e •'::;‘,.:-.:i::.:1:::- have paid w to and depooltpd with State the o of 0,196.00, wtsioh Si the 7.4..;4s,---;;4-:-. • . .. estizattad *oat of constructing the neelorationarit.desaantiontanes • ,,.,,,,,..,,„,., • t;',.:ct.ty.. • , . .. .,., •.!-="".-4,' tie),are necessary for the safety of the traveling pantie when the use of seed sumo point Si oenverted.to an unrostrlotad or Cain/Led use. --1""t•""e ..,:-.;:,S:.:-..-5. .:-.::::::: .; . • HOd, THSRSITUS, in eauddention of 13,196.00 and other covenants here- • 't..ii'4:..:4•••1-f.A 6:;.''..:.........-...:.?..::,J; ' in contained State does hereby'ell, transfer, arrow and ged!it inn Oentro, .....,,,,,,.....,... ---.rj--.Y..<:-.-::•4:-..•:'.t 721?-11,'...! 2'2-4,1r-7 their heirs and assigns, enseants of arson and rights of ingress, egress • ••;.---:‘,-;.'21.+ ,•:-.;rt. •. -aa4 rogrss to, troa and between the right at way of the Solemn Highway ).•••":,:-if.ret74`,1-;',. ir;), ::"::.:77•2:':7 ,.:.:;:",:......!:,...•....s.....: • -. and the Owners, land abutting on the seutherly aide of said highway of a • ,.. •;:-‘,.,::,:..'• •:.,;:,P.f.',..z,-.7.-4,.41 • :, 1-. -;::,,, width at 49 foot opposite Highway Iingineerlo Station 19906, ardttrestricted 1'...' . -..:;•;. :.•:C • .. v--""."."'-un ' . . as to use, iR093:01.0 'SWAM, the aoness point'herein anted is subject to • •4.4.:;;;,744:. . . < •.....1:';'),..,:;?”. 7`..11‘. asS.the right Of the stab to onstruot a Croatia*Toad or nada, as set for, .. , ,;::'..,':•Ifr::: .,..- '11:1...,.':::.:;.t.,::'.'0...:,'7-,;.:' . . •e in Resolution 4a heretofore mentioned, and in such event, the aeons to the . ' ".: ',r;i":..:::,:.=,,-;:::,...;•.:;:.: '.:[....3i;::.'•:j:Sct.-:.•1 . . .• . - • • • ..1 —lt • . McKanic Sighway shill cease, but the Owner., their heire or onigno, *Ion ••II:: "::),:;.-...,..t. i-.. ,;.f.z...-ir. 3 ::::" have :eons to t'ho'frontsgt,road or roads, unrestricted to tstuse.1....z.0.... •• ''• • .f' ,.:, .,,..,. ., v . Exert as herein modified, the deed of June 29, 3,950, remains in full ' ..-...i.:...;...... -11 free and effect and the armee. herein granted ohall by en3obt to the right. of the atate to build•frontage road or roads whereupon an direct ., ....,!...7..1;;...i. "rf-.----••..-.;. • Zt.,'. ',•••••-•.•■:- .7.11,7„:::2';:::::rn:.r...': ..1 . - . ??. :772"....... ....,t.2.-.1."-e •:'t':-..'-: • ' ./ -..v....•q:"- '-'',: .to. . —: -----. .. -..::-.7- ----- -"VT" l' • . —. . Date Receive. .. _ . . _ . .JUN2.t2013 • •...,... • 4 - ,::,.....,f,...,„... .:. ...',,.: ,..1 . . ,:.0 •;..... —7-7 4!:' '- -7 .,.:`:....;..`, ,•::•,-;,:.-.k..1: • • 'YO'rigitial Slit/MAW•-e-tt,-7151-ri—".•,-“,. L'ae:1 : '. '.. ' '..,...,:'•,:.,'.,.....'.....::;:t.,1:,:;;;... i•A-''S,' t,:t 4:(..11. 4:'::,'...' ,k:..;...;••;•;.-.,;../..‘:...'I - .::.:.:.;";.:,:::„ .:' .:-:.I...'... .y•.I..'• :•'...v., '.--'.4Y.'.,.:-/.;...C...../*..:;`•7.,•5tr•t.r.'.:'...•..:.;;;;IS.;,.^%;.:.;•,;;;;;•;:..:::4:;., i. h % a - . ; / rn 4 1(i,e1.',' . .. 4.',:;” ': ..•••••• - ''..-.1:. •".1::,.'..‘ . -.',...: '1,....;;,' ..' ." .-:. ',:•;'4.::-. :-...-.-.:, '., \:... • . • ,:,...,..1.-,, -:. ..: :.- . .;, :, .7.-, '.'. ,',.. --.. . •. . L.,. .....,'.......,::::....._.:•...,.............,...i...._.„;....--%-,..L.÷..—......:-.44.4._..---......„:___.......„... —___..-.c...,........-...-..—z__Tz-..,..,:.:.„ ....._ .. ,,_,-.7.,-- -1----*----"4-- -‘"------•-•-7:77-"-- ' 1:.--"r".:7":"..7...777"-757-.777•77""7","="7777, ,.. r. :.•:-..---77,::2 .._____ip • . . - - --....,-..-...------: .- .. ...... ...„...,..., . •.,......„.....,,,..,..„....„.„..,..,,....„......._ .,, ......„• ._....„.._.....-...„-,...:.„..„,„..„._)..„...,..__„„.....„ -___.....,....„...........................„..... .......„ _,,......;.: e-r r=7,...czty,..zintrzr.-...7.-z_trr.t.zz '-t-.-:;,:s.c.,'-‘""',..71r.-",ir.,-t--•-•.•:::114:4,..-.r..;....•-:::"....j....e..."4.1,J:tr,',:;?,,r4 . .1;',..•............:.-....-,:,....................................... ..........r....r. tr, :v:.-...,..,-: z_^:-.,•:--::,-N.^.=.7,-,n,---r-:". .:rf:71,•=',.-:.1.-L1:',1/41-rr,-7.--44*.ern'tiryt..-44-i'"?..----".t.'47:::,;--:-4-.-2...,::::::7--.•.4=4•7"1-.-..1:4....:r.V.I:t.7'.n-T•.,....,4.1.4.4.;:.,..44 4 cy. -..,,*... ., 4b-:•-i4-.4:-,.-ro4444:rn4 ,-V:4,•- ,ni •,,;••-"".•44,-;a r -nit- cc....f.s,:-...,74.-.4.1.-y-....A.-. 1. , ..7.7........,:-7...Ln...•.-.-- 4ar.4,-;-;11;:-.------;--..--.4:-...- -a7;=--„, 1;=c-:4;17;-::----retnez--... ,•,7---,,rt.-c-,- '■ -."'" -7 -L-.I..::: I''..-:.:'-'.It7Iv';; -:;:..,;:".",...:7:-.-"'":" • u ... y...t.,c,..::.. . - .I. ...a; '...-:or'•' :III,';'r•',):'1.ift•<-•417. trir'' ..,P'...i';'_-:::::::::-■ `; :c..IPI":'^‘"4 .........: _L. .•.2 .:- ...., •,..`,,. .....:...:.. .V.... • •--•-• ••• ;•••••.•••-••• •:',":: '• 4•••• ' e•• -4"" 'A' •r" '•• ii• :,...,•-.4--44...n.• .,.. .. . .-.... .;',,-'.--...“,•• • '1. '- ”is-.., “ •:4. • ../' ..i... ‘.• .i• ....:••-• 4':. • :-:: • a•.: ".. . I i ..S‘:).. 11 ' 1/4 LA ' '' 'filr(''•“tt: "t.1 I:,.;,>...-•• ' .44^4;:yrf‘-..Vt..44,.:i ' •' ....1-' i :. 66I18 4.7."-•••5.;,,'" n.",•.%• ... 1'....''? •' " I ! BTAflOYQRIGOiI ''. ..'.•.. •11•!..•. " . ..' - . aordastor •Nuitoir '-,)• . : .• . .1 . . J . ' „ . .• .• •t.. • •• •.--,iv. • . ., ,. . . • . .. .... , • ..•, •-4 i•••,.. .. i ,, ..:....,- ''.011 this tit—A it of .tiar.a.......-- --, 194, before di opened ••,.., . . • •.,'. ...• -4...... . •.i.)(..-.:;v.' . . •,,,....r., .”.r.t':,".• 4 • " ale=I:7 Seakaae ' n u t • , •K N. Fridley " .' • ••.-nale."-• .....' i. ilit.L:: ::.• ,.,: •.:C....;:ti•-....,',::-.,'.'........•••••-% :; . -dia.iir-din 6ruilmad•-•' thane I:. iredknin*:: •" '..... • -,.re.......'of :. •, • '.1'..;,...: „:„,...„,,. •-tz..,f,-..,t./.•••■r.....,-, : '••" '' . . .,. .,,I,..V. -,:••"V"...'• •I''''''',..,..7.''''....•.-; •:c:" ' the'Stets Hlandi dandholoo At the Met. or oreseki;mais that ha, thi'eatd'• .. • . ,, .....,...,.i. ,•,,,, • — .. , . . . , . ,...,......,. IC i.i• rittinol. •. • •.-c-,...,5r-n-..0,.,-;•;:. . • • . • • ,. • • • • • . . .• ''''':•''''''' t "'.' ••• ' - S. now Wen Condialoner'dt the b tato or.onion, that th. an salad •to •. .. ,.. .. „..„,,.,....... .J.,.......?.,,,... ..c....e.. • ' a'.4,....... '•4,.."4 ‘, . ..• end lastatant le the ant,of tha deattilighway Qntqa, on that the and • • --•••0,•-•`,-.1'..., . . Instrument.b noun end sealed fa behalf at said State by and Onatesion, and .. . ..• .7:::::::;,,I.t, ‘4•2"1":":`•:•••:•°'n•" tba the.Illda..0b1141/Mala AMIT the eald•Oanonelonensaanoolnp and lattrann :.- •... • -7.......■■,:, . ': to berths-free an and dead of and Stan?.by said State Itighway ..„, 1 1,:• • • .-----rs "”•''' . .1.".- . l . •/If fthillent maw, I olio: 13.21omto got loy. hand amA • ',Al!, f."4 attain' ant the day and tsar laat'abovo written ...C.::L.:.•...3,.....L.h.:,..;•: • . •• , , 1!'".....:,:•,: .. . ..,' '..../ ,, A ,• .? , ...,,,,./..,ce.4.,•_,- ,,,,t.),:e;'".•- "''''.."'P• , ..• • ,.,.. ' . ”rt.lio • . gon ‘71,(11y,:int..,.. .i. ,'"i• "...-,.••••,,,', . .. -"," . l'-',"-,'",',..4.• ' Hy Oceattanen'explren . : ., oilt.t.Th. ..„ , ••,•,,.•:.• .0::•'.4.1.11.:,...:-'..,., . ''Lls 0 if • .440... ‘ ••L"..:-E•r 7.7 • 1.-,'4::-.1: 7....i.,i, anti a OnoOr. • 1 • amen ....•:..;.,41;.L....7 ES . . • • . . LANE dottoty of • • • • '1/;...4..t.;• ■,ri,;:,..,,: . ' On this_11.,,_day of Nandit, ' , 1902. penonally aan • • 1 . ',..:„..,,'...•.',„'„ .:,,v.f..,t--:',:_.*ti,r•::: before as a notary public In and for said snooty and nate, the within named • ' . JAMEI-HAYet and AUMICY I. HAWS • • ..4....1*....••■.7..:•,... )zusband and wite, to as personally nova ta be • idea •al persona den .e„, c,4.1.2..i ••••••• ....„„_.,.1.....,.. • Int, and who enacted the within instrument. and oho each pro ae •• ...../410.0/434:1Z, .!. ,, .c.:!:.:•...:„.,..: to that they snouted'114 IPS.trear*he eoluntaall, Vol Wes eels' re ...4-.4..-4;--..... ' i"- :sfi.P;),:-; .....te,: • : i --J.:: -4. •.....,.....,,,....„,....„..... . •fr tyi, ....0.A.. -...n. •••::,..,..•:-•:„. • • •. • •Witbeas wry.0and and nftlatal seat the-day sad year tut,ann. •:: c..,.. •; 75,.. 1;!...:.:,*-:..f.1-: •.• ...:!•,...t, ;.;-•11%'5.*-'r;.! - 4•.- 'b. l'. : ''/1•14,1 :.'re; , ... ..;'4•':-;:,•••:,•:.`. . • • - _, ,,,,,to t°r SC j Amu ay 4..pi P,, I. .. • :1.'.;!;-...!..:' ;•:•t Pt•-.ft . • ... -. .•::. . • ,... !TY it$ 001••111113.ae 11XpiVII I — .....,..•.1... . ...z„,_•::„_ ' ' • '• • ' • • 1 • ' ^ .i...'.:: :.•:,, • • • 1 < I,,•,''': ,' . • • • i f .''','r;•'•.':" • . . •. • ... • . . . .. . • 1 ...T...-7-77-. ' . r. . • .. . . • - • . • ' . "''• - • "'t ::,...... 7'' ''.......-..-.:t7•:.. •• • . . ' • ' .,.,:.„..,..-....,,..t.•..•‘.••,:•,.•.•.:..;,,.„....,,v..„_•i.,'. • - ..."..... .. . i ,... • ,. - D t. Received eived , . •. • • .• $ • • • 4 , ,, , 4 .• 4. i•.t..;-;'-..•..•.--..- 's- •'.,.::,•: r ............I. (4 • •• ' ' . .. 'IL.' • ; • • '''. • 11111.2 6•2013,.„....... ., .........„ .,.....,.,: - - .•-!, . •••,.....,/ •. ' -• • • • ......,...,,.?„..... ,,,4,,..,..... ...„-,ong al-Sotai ... . -• , ., .,.'. . ...-. ., ... ..., - • . • • ...-.". ..11"e '' I ' I••ti Tr•;• ." ' r....:,..:-. ' 4- 14:•::1”:.::: C : :-.:- T.' 1:-...-It; •‘ -.4-71 - .,. •••. . •'' ••• ' •:- ,' . .'": :: .::: A M`:••• " .e.1 :••:'.•1:• ::0- : ', - '• - - . - - - ... • • . • • tt ,eT�..n....-yti+�.—.� ;w.4..':-''�.-:.�--.r.r.� : r.".F',� –,—.;.. . .taF.,. .. .. m ..•i.:.•.....a v.i:..uu�.W..-...�_:....u.� .L._•_v....vu'u - T ,r h6"1'7H aloes..to • - aM.tirviIed'.- o2. O.'.., . Y4 to sly•-• tege Wt1 toe ' 'dttion. Oeetstltoa in sefd deVd - IN WEE a99 V�18120?a tD.:pews.' Inb:toms fnlvted t1 T ,c,,•,,,140) .�„4 �'e tt� f• .• t,e'dv eM 7oe9•:tlret''aboxe'writ�xnx •/•.'1` y ■ e7 .a.•^'.s.' :.dppdpy 1.. �j 1 9tLT, m i p..•41'(� ^; 1 t., rM t..b r! Ue. ',I-} I� eer .I ��Y` C" -1• / • ' 2'" .1 i ! �q ii -. tJ Cm4eeiecNi• .•rvrvx • 414=n1.' Z Sr. Mr4 an L 4 1, ; IF J ; CCC! • ' . r.. . . f .;�. i 4 Mahar - - .I• ._..... V �,\ Dale et d1':`°�_ * .]SI .(v 11 �I. 1 r {�, �..: r :l'. -•duN 2 U 013 a iif•":: + 1 origluai S!11brquta!'. ti F—..):-.*:,-4--,-..,.., 4.- e nl as a ci J ! : l :i r ` i. R +1r -I I 1 • 'd -- J .s, r ` q + "1 i ;r 41411 S a 1- "l e n t/r 3;•1 1{lilt *it� 11 1 i 1 . v...... -_ r -V t -4 .•I t • A•.v U4•} 1.V isi .M .Y .w r.- Y .7.....:"±-if; ` 'l , - J ,`Y 't .T_yyp V t .a1.w = .r \t r W 1Y •' + r• t" rt sn > r , r tt rr`�It fi + .: _, C ( + 1 +Pa n+ fr�4 l,r m f , 3 r.-1 1 fa 'i, 4 ;l { ..JI . 111.4i,hs t , r t • P+ 3 !` JA t-v { 1' t 1 L\ t {t • It 1_ l r J1•E {f)s JS 't ,A'«.11 YMI { .ELY C`\'N t1 .\ Y }n t1t' 7;5:17/3i7.•y >✓ t u YY WIr-t°(k ip 44I • (n r$,g.. rir Ji :9 1 f . t ?.,t:. r s t G ^ i :1:1;4:: .fir A• r r )1�!�. ,r 1 i> < {i , .0, 1 +) 1 1 , 1 q tt r t� i• y v y `l!`l!' It 4�. P,r ` +4 r}I 1 v f . `l�P + t\J 1 .y , s t t 4 \ f , {.,,p . 1 i l i rk }ri.,-4 4 - J•1•4 yir,t ( \ va T. r l l+ 'Y . t ( ':�7 1 1 �V-40th , � tq+ yf 51 r l tft.l f > ) i ` t N , 7' t tt 1 k , r ww slt 1,a:.t .[ rt( Y t •4 t .t. r . SI t-yr lPx+ f"S' yr r « t f F+r n, I a ,� rJ p 1 .9 At-.: r tt r t , Ah: ,ylz, .a ) 1 I a t t r n 1 i ! it, 1 . +�Y 1 L�: ur ` ss mJ� < ,S .I Y ♦ SA 1 \ , { s i. 1)� I { � S 1r 5 t Igi VLI$:7(? o I�tt Jt{'1y it ♦ i 9}t t t, 1 9 r t t' } y t fe Y tr, l l l 4 V +' t ) y 111 (h \e4,.A trN Wirt r �1 .vM lt`j1 � " t4. fhe..0 . t 13 .Y .we rw t. w (" ,{J�',uf� it , Yr ,Ir ' nd4 tlkr,a 51� ri. a'? f 4 N 4 t t t 1 trf 1, n shb IJhfi 'rt,u t 1 :'I ( t,4 •1 i r t• Y ! Sl p J yl rf , ( x+ J.> lyrr : uen�. *'.1 1r ar Jv t.y t i 1 ,h Ar!If tt:•• .1%,:i.!Si) ', fJ , A tMii [,, Apr 95;'4.15'9! 5 1.1 ..it . Y a1 u4 t>=r 21.. ..x fit 1 \ ;4y 1 N fr 1r' ✓ �1{rw trkl A�/ ltrlad ) t4 .ly t N A +_ 1.0.,...: f �4 l4. bS+s {} h 1 A 1 , , , ' f.i, i 7 i r r/( 4.•1-44,10144V;4111•111.• Y .b1e q :y.:t ' r 1 , r r t Pr4i}b i , sEr 1,1i 4 N! y. ( r t } I 157 ''+'. i a�frC•e•it t•tl sr ts,74 .Ali:1/ .M 15A Nt, , na to .i t ✓ O. sr + r rX' ' L7 4ittriNi il • 8 2 I t `�s4�-0�,.-„-.:, 51i .•-�� x ! A +{ ToN}rr t a: • ,� n 5''j cri i Jt r 1, 1 1il +�^ua..m t ,-1 t Mt'.,L,I` •vin`;i.-1" , v'21))) t Gi @ :l J 1 ,, (•� i r.t t ! ' rF fW. 4,1i,'7A)0;EiJ4 4"—IV ie� r.: r a rt r lr °r�,.r+t i j 1 }, r !,1111 tuft ql !1.(('1++,:'.,,k4 `:• ll U $ °J'1'. �y J4yrvt 1 jf. .: �n '.1•u ZFikk psi 5 ta-44'�'31T°16.. '"? aQ 11 s` L>y r 4� � �A�s�v l +.^-• 1' ii ie 1. T11+gya ; aS i I x lid tr�F� IaJ1 Sr}S 4 r 1 i J OA tt�!�'icx}x t\ljAS.t�..Ptr a ).c,r f.J v 'h 1 l'i•1 ?1...0 0yi>x 4".09,r-44`117,t, , Weight+ • lit, � X14, r rv'4tft,* b� •,�y,Fr,,4 i +Lon w1+•art ix r i1f9 t 2 `r I! r , :-.....7.4L lik:, `. r.l.( 4 ` r 2r > !44t i i '� `n YF 1 t r�r t1'ii ,r •� i .f w?'J"} '. t v}1 ¢ rf" r>j d. (a I.. >f`if v-�3 "l fJ. x, °i. �r n 1 4. t r 1,4n f x S' rS.t6 ft FS5 m'.f '7 `.. 1 n �c,.r t. ,R q, K c t t / iit 'r'2. f Jt+ Tr ) +l4Irtn Pfr1 e n!^y 1F4J�t•1 V1y«r A. ut. r'It•sUPI .',.:iir. 1'r 5t t) f1rf !C { ,.. �t 't lair m� f rY 1 Y ro ,4 S a�yrt( !µ'ci �'Mtz '�iSUl ir�4 a i'SL Ci03 1 t"Ir r r•(� it J+ry ¢'@2j+n x (.1t'�t� .57+ tv,ry^h5, Mitt a S f �!' pvi e', 1 i• r ifle jr+4,c• Iittk .%.kl r •E4 tt°' '1 $l(1� ;r&:,1],;tc.:Nrr,S' 'r•,,,Y:ri1 . vi�` 1 S'e.�u i, ,a(''t ,,..1r..''firf�'�(ttgi +"`ig,,,r*F 11{ ps�, ,y n.+ns4 1/l n `r W �)y�i< :ta,:` . r 5<,( «:. �rN$1\li} °?'rt(� a } 'h4..NVk (er.*;. �Y�tIY rrf.xkiiv.'L+N L 9YwF ,,rz Vl ` t_,t ( tftA ::- 4. t Jx -!r i1 v{? < 1Ts. ,1` (, ftrStt ny �.:�' , j Il, a r4 Y� l,� f s +l 11�5{ `�ti' :.^K u'r ti t iY +i1 r } )Lk tt ,va r+�b f\�IIY\ ff i�l\,Y, til .1 f! N ..r[ ��•1 I4`�. il: " tti `( �} .T L1,'t3. 1 il({'. yn,. )LI\.t V X11 t�yy '1n tefh(�} 4 '' 1 Af }`YI�( fr / YY 'TV{r1��.,T 9,�eklple`i r�2(.',ta7'}0,$`i°•y+x'ALie �.trt ,,H(-7,6q �iV }'S1i l�,,,,:4.;72.:1.�aJ t s Y y ! .f� i , Act 1. N1;, ,S� ,.r Sl tl 1 is , 1 .tt Try (3 11'"x'$ , I( tl� ( " 1 r4 < 1 1 t r r9 f e r t It y. i , f (WA y{/y,$1°�1t ">1 Ir 4+ , F+�yy+. "'�4i le��>l'$"1,�a + �i� f� "E Y � rqa+ �,r i(r 4"i 1 � � 1. ``'r3 1. l S'Q?„,,, :Y 1fi'/1 Yi4 .,2ir.Z4t IS+t�s f awi;1J i{ y F 1 e''a l'Miy� lt,,I-,ir4k a114+Lr '" . eft 1 tz\ t}t tt! Wp 1131 r Y5 7rJ 1tiJl 4 S FJ e wr n rirf i )r n �,1 1 r , Y ( 1 st x t A, t r y , lt+v y }, 'L t} v fi . t 1r t j +q, r I r 7 y . iv � :t rAtW ' taYrik� 41'ti � 91{jnn os rlyt r i t� :� ..,*h S�jt TX1ii;'415 E h$ ` y{.s2 yt 7t ir4•e t<'Iwu�. l r 1Jyt4 M xr'Xr �7 t7 F f I<)J" v ,'Ykgpp�t {y Ir,\ (.d I�1 �, , jIl*1 N. u} �,,W4 f�r./1}�y �/ 7( �9 F^n y)Z{,� �A i t}s, T { r FF,,,,A;7f aAS.. ¢¢ { %I:.tjl'Ig,k, wJ y., �� -.ie,y�M1w} it+Fi t4ak 1 j .,. 9,3r '4µ. t Yr ib Y'r5{, 6 r .«Y4 g { ♦ Y ,I A E <S b (f 'I.1 s n ,i k':rrrl..gg,, �-1/ 'T ',..Qt�e )4e! rna '*fs .,:.t041.0.41.4.:•,;;;;G ^tar, ' Jr ''�°� '!'c ,4,44�9.9Ct!;14 <1s Pd�I�F.J(. }�df' ' t � +��l q 1��iit0 ))�SF✓>ty, r ' (N� �t v J�tli �t t l'"r,�.1' •�,�, ey S t , P : Vil�++t'44E,4.i��{{il� i.ii.j r fr`ct+(�S,',0 47,efe :1111 r . `{� , .,:it4 .,Qrn t srArkii yk.fi .lt` y,2 Rf � t i Y{r .,' +i i;i!4' f) 5ti1A.. lP':i`'St3,i,pai t ,34{N'J{ y ` ii3O)0,, 7n,'t,,f} 4?:tin y�1�,ti Flti-'Jrr�y ;:;'4!:., f :rri,T(4'44'4'4(,,,J'1v t<jOilPt'i11t t' tio,91,ikfj ,uvvFRS4i at„"}Y �t:,q4 Vr'EJ tX r:4.yii h.^`Atni�'t`, �4 i`lyy}t` r 7. 1 Si: 1's'JA - !°11,•YJy12.lta ,fe ,rl w.l l tL tjrl tr 'ejk r« %-.. ,4 rr(•tl1.tS 1`W:..t r r t rft?+R `S It 10"lJ+ \i;t, ✓i:ciAAi ,t n rr 11 tr ,,.7,0A1 -,:.t`Viii} E�`,, , IYr 5 va !1' y. ,5S Nisyn,tt9.� fir '•" x4,,,,I'{ rryr...wi r` + tF}in.a 14 1J1 i (-Vzi iEI0 fi 1 Nth c� �f r Ir f, t � lu�..FF.IY,kill .fi .l, 1 ,l. A:1 F 11f .\, , <At 1'a, (I,a 5S 7 11 iCZ ,v��",q 1'{3y�'"'y +,lreS 11�')'/�(64 rr�y;� 7 i.+«.+Ji .••'�„(cf�!11E l .' t. r y(t`lyl ✓� '�,44a t'a'52.. F t"41'{1'T[t1•41 rOrr1 ii �a V:iif4tai t 1.1it kF j,k f t.,.l 7Fn 4• � `v r^11�1 . J I�z !•1 F.f� tt�� 4 't W I , r r I �re I,, 5 f t ie t(tv4. , f1 A•r� riQ if'S rJ A H tm tt rt {; } Z ,. \r e k Y r yl� `r4:,11-)4 5 +iN /9 f 7� i7� r .:31l j91. "St' <Yr“}:1 rS� l 41rnf,_ f4'`i4 i 41 t�J fl •c ti ii 7 at r.; oTf. ) c 51' (ep,,Ij, /�'Ai.t 4.4 r F 11 IJ Yt) �!, {al i` t IT ri^ta«ii y! a b.' -Pr 1 fi„ `t 1 JF-AYI.S`ti tl P d• .: v snJ ta...,.ri • u.7..J ) ,.,• r • DateReeeived: y :;1 , (.....' JUN 2 6 2013 r • • • ,'. • I. • — :, e original Slubrmtfal t 1 1 1 r r 7 T_ Attachment '4' . • • • •... . .. . . . . . . . • .- ' - •••• ' - . • • -- •14;/..P• 11033. .:. . ---- - .- - 12141 ••• . . :. .. . . . . .• • , .. .. . .. ... ..- • • P Approach .. .- (To be ciiiinturlinolemOWIca) '" • ' '.' ' . . . . . '• ' ' .. . . • . : • . .. .. • . - w • • . , .. ; OREGON STATE mORWAY conngsszoN . . . . . • . . • . . . . .. • . • • Application and Permit to Construct Approach Roccd • . . . . • . . . . • . • . . • - •JOante Hayes . • , Applicant, . . (mops Or parson,pinor corporation) &pato 2 . •Aatotion City • .• .. , . • • oreg9i1,:u41dei • .. , . . . ' . . . the provisionanf ORS 374:305.to 374.325,hereby-deciaresAnd4preaents to the State ... ... . te.Yof.-Oregen.. -by and through.it!i.State.Highviey.:. • Commission, that he is the ownerAggalltof cerfainiciiprOpertyabutting upon iatatehighway at the following'described location, ' . '. and that he has laWful authority to apply forthis•permit and to leanest and authorize the State of Oregon to 'construct such%-ap- • . proabh road, antinutkes application for a'-nermit to.construct and maintain a firrneX29fparrrianeet* approach road connecting said . •. . . . . • • 3putli• • ... - - • • • • prop`Orty on "- side •-•- '. IfighWaY1 . :.. . .. . . . • . No 1? Route NO.U.S./0210% . Lute Count*,Oregon,between/tag/4P .. _ • .. • augeta and. . aiirringfield . • . • " • • • • and,more particularly described as • .. . . 199) .. - . . . • • being at Mile Post , Highway Engineer`a 636 Station as indicated by the dimensiOns,figures and sketch map or plan contained herein. Dig. 6S3-15 .. . . . . - . . . . . . . . The applicant hereby agrees that If such permit is.granted,to fully and faithfully With all the provisions regulal. Atone hereinafter sot forth and such other reasonable rules or regulations.as may hereafter be promulgated by.lbeiOregon State ' • Highway Commission governing the construetion...nutiptenance, and operation or use Of:snail approach road, and further agrees 4o bear all expense.ot construction and maintenance of said approach road: - '- : :• . '.' '_,../ •••'.• . • • :• • " ' - I- - - • • . ---- - : . , . •r• • . . . . ' .. • Date L.22.;62 . . . •• . . . . .... . , (Si,... of ..11 or /.1 whipsaw) . • . ' . ' . • . . . ' , . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . ' . . . . . . • • . . , . . . . - . by . . . . • . " . . . . • ..• - .. ... . .. . • . . . . . . . .. . . . • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' • - - • . . • • . . . • . ' . ' GENERAL PROVISIONS • ,, - '. • . • • 1 • • • • . . • • . . . . . . . . • - . . . . . . . . . . 1. No approach road or other-facility shall-be constructed upon the highWaY-right of way until a signed copy-of this permit is returned to the applicant. . .. . . . . . . . • • - . . . . - • . . . . . 2. The word Engineer as used herein shall mean the State Highway Engineer or his duly authorized representative . ..- .. . - . . .... . . . • • •• ' - • t'- 3. This permit is granted with the specific understanding-that the applicant shall:be responsible and liable for all-accidents,. damage or injury to any person Or property'resulting from the construction,maintenance,repair,•operettower use Ot said approach • • road for which the applicant may be'legally liable,.and that the applicant shall held blameless and harmless and shall indemnify-the • , State of Oregon,its State Highway Commission and members thereof,Its officers,:agents and empleyeeiagainst any and all'clebne, • • - demands,loss,Injury, damage, actions and costs Of actiOns,Whatseever,which:they/or any'of them may sustainby reasons of the acts, conduct =operations of the applicant,his agents or*einpleyeexIn.cennectiOn with the•construction, maintenanda, repair, operation or use of said approach road. . . . . . .• ...• . . . . . . . . . . . • -• .. . .. . _ . • • 4, The conatruction,Maintenance,Operation-and use of said approach roadie subieette the paramount control of the . \ over said highway, and no right or privilege herein'granted:Shall be deemed or.'senstrupd,:te he beyond the reach or authority of the legislature to control the said highway,-and the-applickitt In accepting this permit accepts it knowing that the rights and nevi- legea herein tgranted may at any time be defeated-and atirogated.by legislative act.- . • . . .• . • . . 5.-The stopping or Renting of vehicles upon the state.highway right-of way-for the.servicing of such vehicles or in further- ance of any business trans-action or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. Minimum set back distances as shown by. • .' dimension/ on the sketch map or plan herein for bullcangs,.pumn Islands,or.any ether structure now existing-on or hereafter*Cad on applicant's property, shall be strictly observed. NO APPROACH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR OR BY ANY APPLICANT,- FAILING TO CONFORM, . - . . . . • . . • . • . 6, The number of approaches to a single property shall be limited to.a minimum that will.allow the property'to,accom- modate and service such traffic ea may he reasonably anticipated, NO.APPROACH ROAD WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO OR . PERMITTED ON A HIGHWAY OR SECTION'THEREOF -WHERE RIGHTS- OF ACCESS TO OR FROM THE ABUTTING . PROPERTY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE STATE THROUGH PURCHASE OR GRANT-OR WHERE RIGHTS OF ACCESS HAVE NEVER ACCRUED. . . . • ' Date Received: . - . . . . . . • . . .. . . • strike out word or wordi not olotialcable. • • . . . . r ' . . .....s . .. . .. . . . • • . . . .. • JUN 2 6 2013 . , . . . . . . . . . • . • Original Submittal. 7..In.the coostruction.of an approach road'under-thls''perniit, either by the.applicant or by the State at the expanse:of"the• applicant;the State.recoghlzes.the'applicant's ownership•of the materials'entering into said construction, If, for any reason (other than,reconstruction or widening el the lilgtiway);it later'becomda necessary or desirable for the State to remove sucit'approach road, it ahall.be removed by the State-at the expense of the,applicant,.and:credit will be allowed for such materials,it any,as are'salvaged for re-use by the State; - . - 0. If In the event of the reconstruction or widening of any highway, it becomes necessary to remove, alter or reconstruct the approach road constructed:under.authority of this permit,,the cost of such removal:or replacement to a like width and condition will be borne by the State. Any widening or.Other Improvement of the approach road at the applicant's request shall be done only under authority ate new permit:and at the expense of•the applicant.. • -- . 9. The construction of the approach road by,the'applicant,his agent or contractor, (if authorizedby the-Special Provisions of • this permit), will be.permitted,,only when the applicant furnishes evidence'of having at his disposal adequate and suitable equip- . . :. mant for'doing-the work.and-`furnishes satisfactory.plans and.speciflcetlona. .. _ • 10, Unless pertisssion.for construction•of-the approach road in whole or in part by they applicant, his agent at contractor, is specifically granted:in the'Special.Provlafons•of this permit, the construction of said'approach.road-will be done by.the State, including the.furnishing and.placing'of all necessary for the completion of such.portion of the approach road that'occupieg the highway.right.et..way;,'specifically:.drainage, facilities,'dirt,;rock,surfacing,'and curbaor other materials listed In Special.l?ro- visiions or Shown on the sketch map herein. , , . _ _ 11, -No materials villa be-•ordered'by the State-until this application,,completed`and.accampanied by Bash;money order, or' • • certified.check,'payable fa-the.Oregon;State highway.Commission, in the'amount hereafter 'stated In the Special Provisions, is., approved by the:.Pistriot Maintenance Superintendent: No construction will be undertaken by the State until this permit is ' . executed and returned to the epplicant and•all conditions specified.herein have been complied with. • 18.-• It the actual final'coat ofwork done.or.materials furnished by the State In construction of all orally part of the approach'. road is more or lese.thn the estimated cost thereof;the difference between the actual cost and the estimated coat will be refunded to the applicant Of will be palate the State by the applicant within 10 days after receiving.a bill'therefor, as the case may be. 18. Upon Completion otsaldapproachroad,the applicant may perform additional-minor work, such as seeding or planting of - island, working-or-cutting edges-of said approach;-etc:, provided that such'work is done in a manner so.as to cause no interference to traffic upon the highway end leperformed at the applicant's tole expense. 14,. The entire expense of-maintaining.said approach road shall be borne by the applicant,who is.hereby permitted to make minor repairs, such as the correction_'of tregulexideein the surfacing of the approach road,.,repair of curbs or walks,etc„ pro- videdthat the maintenanceWork does not'interfere with or Mteriuj2t traffie•upon and'along the highway. No work shall be done • and no equipment;shall:be used by the applicant;on the shoulder Of the highway,at any tline,.unless applicant shall have first secured ' approval from the Superintendent of Maintenance of the district in'which the.approach road is located._ . • : ' 18, No unauthorized signs shall„be placed,permitted.or maintained by the applicant.upon any portion of the right of way,nor shall any'signs not conforming to law'be placed;permitted oriiaintelned on property adjacent td:the right:of way (ORS 87?:840 • and•408189)? Where standard;warning signs, such as 'took,•Out,for Log Trucks,"are required by this permit or'other regulations, • o •'are ordered by•the Engineer to provide se of theapplicant. . . . . . _. - - 10: The planting'or.placing of'other adornmonts not.prohibited by law oh the island or any portion of the right of way • by the applicant shall be limited-to low graving shrubs, grass, or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision filthy direction. Nd curbs, poste:or-other structures.shall be'placed on the highway right of way within ten (10) feat of the edge of pavement. -• .. . . , . 17, The applicant hereby authorizes officers, employees, agents; representatives•and contractors of the State Highway - CommisSlon to enter upon property owned-or lensed by'said applicant for the•purpose-of constructing the said-approach road: - .• 8 . The word °applicant° 'and'.all. references to the applicant contained herein shall include the plural when appropriate. . ®ate Received: JUN 262013 . Original Submittal • • 1 • 2. APPROACH ROAD: Type of surface _._.-4.aE.i...4.`.�Tt'.c.=.a . . Top width _..... 45' Surface thickness ;kb ..,.in. Pipe required? ......._.._: NO biam, Length • Kind Min. depth cover. Bridge, catch basin or other unusual drainage facility required? ..........n..._ • -- (If so,eitplain on attached sheet and submit sketch or specify Std,Plan No. ) •. _.:; Treatment of island,if any Monti - dune Ew. Kind and amount of fill required .............._........ r _ ' Materials to be furnished or items of work.to.be done by applicant .. -. �••.. • _ . WO apadtlaelly,or it hone,'dale"nona'•11 . ':'. r . I 1 _9 L. i..: 1;.n.11 I. Materials to be furnished or items of work to be done by State • Construct left turn 1antatrr widen pavement? rebuild curba? as per attached alma (Lid aneeltleelly,or It nano,stele"none") 0196.03 Cheek .. Estimated cost of Statewmk....._.._..___._....._.._..._».,....__.._............... CheclyWitiO 7affiliY .__..........._..........._ • S. HIGHWAY SURFACE: Type AC Width 60t _., Curbs? ......._....-3'0 at A show vpe) Shoulder-width Oiled? ..._.. R/W-Width aE this side .....»...._...: .._.................__....__......_.._................... 'Peugeot Alignment at approach road (On tangent,or applox.degree ourve lea or right) Sight distance (from Point.a feet back of shoulder or curb) ,..,.... . !... __....._....._..........,ahead...„..,,1.U... back Right of access purchased or otherwise obtained by State? dtantitrtf of 1!iCCeea now being ptooOsaod Nature of business to be served by this approach... ........ L[4Uettr11s7. __ ... . Fell Is adequate space provided for parking vehicles off the l3%W?.... ......................._..-.........___..........._..._.........._......._......�^ v f ^L. L'-� '",yl Date Y, .» Permit recommended ....................._...__._......_............. _ . .._ . .....».»_..__._..................._._..._ (Dlsldot Maine non( dent) _ - . y ..: .. '). 'Permit recommended Date f_ .:'. _.s__..,:,> .». _. (Dvlsot anglnen9 .. ....._... AUTHORIZATION or PERMIT In consideration of the applicant's agreement to comply in all respects with the regulations of the State Highway Commission covering such operations, permission is hereby granted for the construction of the approach road or driveway as described in the above application and Special Provisions, said approach road or drriveway to be in accordance with the regulations herein sot forth. E. condition understood is that understood athat ithes permit is issued subject to thetapproval of local,city its townuauthorities having joint supervision over saki street or highway. ' _. OREGON STATE HIGIIW M45 . /, Dated t � '. 3 ° ' By .r Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 84te1't—"un j • Original Submittal • • • ..• . • • . . • • . . • . . • • . . • .•-• • • . • •• . . . • ' '. .•' . . - . . • • .. . iii11301AL PROVISIONS - • • . . • . . . ' • - . • - . . . . . . . . . . • . . . .. • • 1. The approath road ccnrct;ect by,this•perrnitshall be ill:tile/do&and shiill content tethe dimensions and figures indicatedon - the following or atioehed skotai map,dress-sealed andithedule of•diMensions, and Shall be constructed to the grado established by the Engineer. • - . - . . , . .. . . .. . • - • . , . . . . . • . • . • .. . - . .• ..- SISRL.E. APPROACH ROAD. . • . . . • . Right Angle Or Skew Construction Optional ' • ,• . - . . Curb Return or Drop Curb'Optional When Curb Required . • , • • . . • • . ' IR; ' . ., - • . • ' . . . . • . • • 6 4 .• . . t. ic . . . ' , .• v: . ' . • ' ' It n': . ... . .. .- . . . • . . .. . . • • . . . • . .. . . .. . . . • . • . , . . • . . • . Riot e rival, ..i, • - . - . bt.L.. .....it . . .. .., . . . - • • _. . • . . - . . . - . - • - -•• • • - • - • - . • . - . . • . , . - . - .- • : -Otiye'oatS/?ouldf2...„.: . - . • '. ' c.,_i-boto offiboulikir • ! • • . • . • . ' - . • • ... • " •'-*--!; 44V.kr.tair!g•Mik:R.:!?SlY:'!"`;',W1.1Se•-i7:!•.;;:t:cai•S:1!:""it..iCrF9,1A'il;SI;WW5774TFPraf,-Mff,kta, k!•,1":.V:MCI ,'*4!,:t.:;,:!:!Y",ir:?:e"?!!':..A;V::.*”(ST:0 (X.cfa.:;.:Riti$V,,SiVatftetf.•Rese,Pt•sti,WlEd4„:fLi ' . .. .. • •.• : _ .. . . . " ' • -- . . .. . • . . ..r. . • • • . " - ' " ' ".• •• • ' . ' " - DUAL APPROACH ROAD . . • : DUAL.APPROACH ROAD.NOT PIWZiorTell IF rorm..HIGHWAY raonrAstt Is ass rtmiv los an' t .:•. • ' AlgtitAngbpon Skew Construction Optional ' 6 . . •. . -.•.. .. .Corp Return or Drop.Curb Optional When Curb Required . . , . I . . . ••• . • . . . , . . . 1. h. . .% . • • . . • • . . . . . . . .. , _.. ... , . . - - " •. , , . • . . . • - - • - • • l'4t • - . • : - . . • .. . • 1 . . . - .. • • .- • . • Zl. - • .. . . . . . . . . 'offro0 LI "! • - - I\-'• 4-- • • ' - • - • "-• - • '-'• ''•- .. . . . ......... . Right • ' IL N4---_01_-L-,..4 . • • • 4,4 0 4' . . . • ' ,...• Edge of shwa/de:2 .../ • , . -''.....;dga of Shoulder ' • . . • • . ' . . . . . . . - . . Ed-.of •opoinInt or nItor Oct-a ot movin• raffia .: . • . 4731Wiltt'-',WirW4;11:KWirMARSIMWS4,5•PLW,k4:,"."77.41.*:717%. AV'... . .. . .. , /::"...-xwa;:f.h.•-w4;s:Tti..s,"15.3',;. ,., ./L-.1,11,16c.t1/41-•4.'^.,tvicce '..", •-• .. Pa.;i14," 'Iliestws • " • . .. . . . . . , .. ... .. .. . . .. , . . . . .. . . • . . • . . ' .. •. '.' . • ' - . .:: . '. SCHEDULE • 6 .-DitviEtttici:Nt.- • . • •• - : • • •• . .. • Applicable to Single or Dual typo Access ••• . . . - , . .. . . • ' • • • ..• . - .• •-• ••. • •. •. •• • • • • • . . ' .". . ." • . ••• • " ' . ' • . •• " . • . . .. •• . • • ..-..' ' Dimenni•ori --- •• id inimUm•:.'.. .-... -. ., • Ma Ulthum Approved "" • • !• • . . .• .. • • •• tif•r!. !: • ' . 101.• ":. •• " -. t None- • ••• •• :1044 • - ••• '' ' ' . . . • -. . • . . . .. . . • , . ' • . • • • . - 02!' • 'Cr.. :• : . • Nona' • : • •10Ipt•• • Date Received: . • • • . it • • • . . • . - - •• NI 10 . ' . • JUN 26 6 2013 . . . . , W • • • IS' ' ....' •• • so': £5' . . s • .. ' • .10! .. ' . • • . Hone : . •• • • OriginalSubMittal • • " . • . • . . • . • . - • o . . - •A n9le.of skew - .. 96° •, • ••• .... 4E,4.. : . co • • • . • • •Ona common *Orem* to adjacent proport'y may be permitted provided .W does not exceed DO' . .t Otrik•eat mart1 net ttppllenlile. - • . •- , . . •. .• ' . • . . . • - .. • . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...- . . . . ,. . • •- . : . . . • • . . • . . . . . . / • Attachment 'S'• 111 ta l - a r `o S 14 j 82 03 p i' I ; I Oil. 4 SCIE4 ., it ELI 1 a_• 4 1 a.d .. g. a —it ! IC p � ° p s Ji: i$'i " p L i t . t *It /$ ii z �fio I1J1 _ bi il m 1icd 2I - 1 11 1I ik� g I4 PSI , 1 11 - : A 1 ; it o - 34 6 vs r $ Q W 3 1!O 1 g $ 18 044 g 2h Hijiq �as wi $ Ni 1-: s 11 _ ism Za p ail ti I.Va a ae • • • • • o 0 '.• Q za EA Z O 31 fG It , —:_ _ t m :( : *2 : 3 dx � hi- 91 IA • � 0 4��i W `II C' ell �+ � W S J 41,-c 3 o d B G t- $ 1 i , ffi .?- 111t .1 $ 1 ;ga B & ' i jail g . m a 3 i y � o C.m a ��a Da t' m � m � .� v � i �; � � � � f5 ,- al � SO 11 --I co J 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ I1W is e Cl c gg E �� t e c8 a S I 1 a ,, 0 Nth 0 � � � t IQ iDt ijil 4L a ... i III I iIIIi i i R � P C cry b° _ " B t $ 14 .47 dill 01 iii 42 :121 i 1 93 al ill 4 I, i 1 I I IH i n in Vie DID ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ti �1 ! 1 8 a • Attachment '6' • • WEsTEv TITLE & ESCROW COMPANY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.FSB Successor Trustee of the Ekir*1,Armes Trust Dtd 11/27/2001 Amendment 2/5/04 hereinafter called grantor.for the consideration hereinafter stated,to grantor paid by Alpesh Patel and Komel ll$Patel,as tenant,by the entirety hereinafter called grantee.does hereby grant,bargain,sell and convey unto the grantee and the grantee's heirs. successors and assigns,that certain real property,with the tenements,hereditament,and appurtenances thereunto belonging or In any way appertaining,situated In_County.State of Oregon,described as follows,to-witt 11 03 34 33 00700 acct/0299436 17 03 34 33 00700.901 acct ft 1507381 See Attached Exhibit"A" To Have and to Hold the same unto grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns forever. M grantor hereby covenants to and with grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns,that the real the ame and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful laimssard demands of all persons warrant ing by, through,or under the grantor. The true and actual consideration paid for this ratter,sated In terms of dollars.is S390,000.00 In construing this decd.where the context so requires.the singular includes the plural.and all grammatical Changes shalt be made so that this deed shall apply equally to corporations and to Individuals. In witness whereof,the grantor has executed this instrument on July sL—.2001 :If grantor is a corporation.it has caused Its name to be signed and its seal,if any,affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by order of its board of directors. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OATHS PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP MB PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TTR$TOT SPPROPERTY SNOULDCHBCK win'THBAPPROPR�TB CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. DEPARTMENT TO WIMPY APPROVED USES AND TO DINIMMINB ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30390. MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.FSB Successor Thome of the EIaht E An na Trust Did 1 127/2001 AmenYI Brian Saglimben,v Estate officer STATE OP N 7e County of Macd'a• i su This instrument was ackrowledged before me of t 3ia007 by Brian Saglimben V.P.Real Estate Officer for Merrill Lynch Bank&Trust Ca FSB Successor Trustee of the Elaine H.Arms Trust Dated 1127/2001 Amendment 2/5/04 /./".4-' = �. BARBAFtAA.CORRADO O;:•'' •s- :),v. Notary Public forAugea _,,y, NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY My commission expires 1. ,. • :L ittomc star cones ppte/ ant a 1 ~'. After Recording Return To: 9' x •s• wurneablecnEtwou F@mlof In CamY 487 Oaken?Rd.Suitt 340,fugue OR07401 • .• / ,. taill Owns ss b requesiel all nor ruemea. Shell be wt,tees rolkAWag aide.: Alma Patel sad Kant is Patel 7-04IDivision of Chet Deputy Clerk b5r1 Rstt &U� County Deeds and Records � C gcait wed: I I I 1I 111111111 $31.00 JUN 2 6 2013 0v0siz00i 01:09:20 Pct RPR-GEED Cel.' StewS CASHIER 01 $10.00 $11.00 $10.00 Original Submittal • -- • • 616RB1B "A" • • Beginning at a point in the North Wad the Bata Sweet Donation Land Claim No. 68, Notification No. 3184 in ltwetefip 17 South, Range 3 West Willamette Meridian, 14.45 chains South73" 30' West from the Northeast corner thereof and running thence South $.44 Mains to the center of the slough running Easterly and Westerly tarougb said claim, thence up the center of said slough North 87" Bast 1.77 chains, the North parallel with the East line of seidielaim 9.88 chains, to the North lies of said claim and thence South 73" 30' Nest 1.89 chains to the place of bepnning, being a part of said Donation Land Claim in Lane County, State of Orson. ALSO' Beginning at a point on South line.of Pacific Highway right nifty South 0" 03' Bast 57.8 feet from a point is is on North from Oa Northeast cornerlofmthe Zara OSweetnt Donation Land Claim No. 68, in Township 17 South. Range 3 Nest of the Willamette Meridian, thence along Soot*liDe of Pacific Highway right of way North 74" 01' 30" East 57.0 feet, theme Soutn 1. 0' East 360.0 feet to center of slough, thence South 88" Met 55.3 tat, thence North 0. 03' West 388.1 feat, mare or less, to point of hesitate, all in lane County. Oregon. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • Attachment '7' • m 1651 Centennial Blvd.• Springfield,OR 97477 260 Country Club Rd,Ste 120•Eugene,OR 97401 P.O.Box 931 • Springfield,OR 97477 P.O.Box 10211 •Eugene,OR 97440 Phone: 541.741.1981 c• Phone: 541.687.9794 Fax: 541.741.0619 .t• Fax: 541.687.0924 Evergreen land Tide Com03nV TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES • ESCROW CLOSINGS June 11, 2013 Order No. 12-7261 SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT City of Springfield do Leahy, Van VactorPartial Billing Cox& Melendy, LLP Additional Chain $100.00 188 West B Street Bldg N Springfield, OR 97477 Attn: Bill Van Vactor TOTAL $100.00 e-mail: bw @emeraldlaw.com Dear Bill Van Vactor: We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies as applied for,with coverage's as indicated, based on this preliminary report. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO Showing fee simple title as of June 05, 2013, at 8:00 a.m., vested in: ALPESH PATEL AND KOMAL PATEL, as tenants by the entirety Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7261 JUN 2 6 2013 Page 1 of 4 Original Submittal SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. CURRENT EXCEPTIONS: 6. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 7. Any adverse claim based upon the assertion that the location of Slough has moved and that any portion of the subject property has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portions so created, or based on the provisions of ORS 274.905 through 274.940. 8. Easement, granted to Glenwood Water District, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded September 21, 1995, Reception No. 95-53025, Lane County Oregon Records. 9. Urban Renewal Plan for Glenwood, including the terms and provisions thereof, as set forth by instrument Recorded December 14, 2004, Reception No. 2004-095229. 10. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 11. Lease as disclosed by Lane County Tax Rolls. NOTE: Taxes, Map No. 17-03-34-33-00700, Code 04-28,Account No. 1507381, 2012-2013, $101.43, paid in full. (Account Assessed to CBS Outdoor Inc.) Taxes, Map No. 17-03-34-33-00700, Code 04-28, Account No. 0299436, 2012-2013, $2,598.77, paid in full. NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: 3005-3007 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403. NOTE: A Judgment/Lien/Bankruptcy Search was done for the name(s)ALPESH PATEL AND KOMAL PATEL, and as of June 05, 2013, none were found. NOTE: As of June 5, 2013, there are no liens for the City of Eugene. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY FINDS NO NOTICE OF RESCISSION RECORDED IN THE LAST 24 MONTHS. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7261 JUN L�1 C 203 Page 2 of4 U L Original Submittal___ INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all changes back to the deed which vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows: WARRANTY DEED RECORDED JULY 5, 2007, FROM MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO. FSB SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE ELAINE H. ARMES TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 27, 2001 AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2004, TO ALPESH PATEL AND KOMAL PATEL, AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETY, RECEPTION NO. 2007-046005. NOTE: SUPPLEMENTED TO UPDATE REPORT, SHOW TAXES PAID AND DELETE EXCEPTION#10 WHICH IS NOW SATISFIED. Very truly yours, EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY HOME OFFICE By: Joseph M. Silence Title Officer cc: NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED,A MINIMUM CANCELLATION FEE OF$200.00 WILL BE CHARGED. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7261 JUN 2 6 1013 Page 3 of 4 Original Submittal • • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point In the North line of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No. 68, Notification No. 3284 In Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, 14.45 chains South 73° 30'West from the Northeast corner thereof and running thence South 5.44 chains to the center of the slough running Easterly and Westerly through said claim, thence up the center of said slough North 87° East 1.77 chains, thence North parallel with the East line of said claim 5.88 chains, to the North line of said claim and thence South 73° 30'West 1.85 chains to the place of beginning, being a part of said Donation Land Claim in Lane County, State of Oregon. ALSO: Beginning at a point on South line of Pacific Highway right of way South r 03' East 57.8 feet from a point which Is on North line of Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim and which point is South 74° 12'West 831.6 feet from the Northeast corner of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No. 68, in Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, thence along South line of Padfic Highway right of way North 74° 01' 30" East 57.0 feet, thence South 1° 0' East 360.0 feet to center of slough, thence South 88° West 55.3 feet, thence North 0° 03' West 388.1 feet, more or less, to point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7261 Page 4 of 4 JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • • -cT-1.`---__4_,_:"-_==-'1.------=-4.-,-,1h," t 7--z.,- gp St- }�� _'" 1 tc t .ter?- ..: c ._ '— la, 3 �e;, �. R J { V g %. - n �a, _ _ _ _ .4c 1 y� max'- ,_1f ^ ~- ED<I—io_ es i t" 11- I o ..m `G � t ,, _ == O will a sr •i 1 V °0 '* r as* 1 1 j t. „ o W Cc a n ds rs'r �� s ` - -- - _� W - t; ` JUN 2 6 2013 ����g a. Submittal • Produced by Evergreen Land itle on 6/11/2013 at 3:18PM using RLID(wwwd.org) Page 1 of 1 Lane County Property Taxes Due Report Tax Account# 1507381 Alternate Property#(maplot) 17-03-34-33-00700 Tax Code Area (TCA) 00428 Location Taxpayer CBS OUTDOOR INC PO BOX 404 BROADWAY, NJ 08808 Property Values & Taxes P'u1p flR 1p,mark t'; ! lue;(Rm ? ifl I4�I';lP II 11 "'�P i'VI d'"Clhhl•II'' IPlla ''I[ G Ik Land Improvement Total Total Assessed Value Tax 20112 0 10,979 10,979 6,337 101.43 20,11 1[11 1 0 10,980 10,980 6,152 99.54 Current Year Assessed Value 6,337.00 Less Exemption Amount ( 0.00) Taxable Value 6,337.00 Frozen Assessed Value 0.00 Exemption Type Account Status Account Status Account Status Notes •Active Account Current Tax Year Related Accounts 0299436 Remarks Billboard Taxes Due for Account # 1507381 Delinquent Interest (if applicable)Computed Through: 6/11/2013 The tax shown is the amount certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property, resulting in a tax correction. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. p A �'11ff f' ' 4V �l 11116/11#741111111 F 11 00104:106i hl ITaxi ; M,inlmum IlflDuy;Dae," ' 2012 Property Tax Principal 101.43 0.00 11/15/2012 Taxes &Assessments due for Account Number 1507381: $0.00 Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal Produced by Evergreen Lena Tit1e on 6/11/2013 at 3:18PM using RLID(wwild.org) Page 1 of 1 Lane County Property Taxes Due Report Tax Account# 0299436 Alternate Property#(maplot) 17-03-34-33-00700 Tax Code Area(TCA) 00428 Location 3005 FRANKLIN BLVD EUGENE, OR 97403-2265* Taxpayer PATEL ALPESH & KOMAL 1857 FRANKLIN BLVD EUGENE, OR 97403 "Multiple site addresses exist on this tax account. Property Values & Taxes � lir I' Real Market Value' RMV 4 '?';'.I L, '.ur'i ' 1i1 1,1, Land Improvement Total Total Assessed Value Tax 2'012 216,284 60,902 277,186 162,359 2,598.77 2811, 216,284 58,003 274,287 157,630 2,550.55 Current Year Assessed Value 162,359.00 Less Exemption Amount (0.00) Taxable Value 162,359.00 Frozen Assessed Value 0.00 Exemption Type Account Status Account Status Account Status Notes •Active Account Current Tax Year Related Accounts 1507381; 5645685 Remarks none Taxes Due for Account # 0299436 Delinquent Interest (if applicable)Computed Through: 6/112013 The tax shown is the amount certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property, resulting in a tax correction. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. Description i' i '. Tax ' ?,�Mirnmtim ',; Due Date' 2012 Property Tax Principal 2,598.77 0.00 11/15/2012 Taxes &Assessments due for Account Number 0299436: $0.00 Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • Privacy Policy Notice As adopted July 1, 2001 Evergreen Land Title Company Private Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution,-directly or through its affiliates,from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Evergreen Land Title Company. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms. • Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others. • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. • Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: • Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. • Non-financial companies such as envelope stutters and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • Attachment '8' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/Engineering Division Phone:(541)726-3753 Fax:(541)736-1021 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK —(Area below this fine filled out by Applicant)—•- (Please return to Matt Stouder®City of Springfield Public Works Engineering;Fax#736-1021,Phone#736-1035.) Project Name: Candlowood Suites Applicant: App.Rep:Richard M Sofro Assessor0 Parcel 17033433-00700 and 17033344-00100 Date: Aprli 16,2013 Land Use(s): Proposed 85 Unit Hotel PhOne 4; 541.686-4540. Project SizO (Dues): 08,334 sf(Approx.2.28 acres) Fax#: 541-688-4577 ApproO Im'"•d�pp.fJervio Os 31,336sf Email: dek@schirmersatre.com : 1 ` 1l, .Ri nti44•0F2.r,'•.ig•-:!f.i `.:1J:15 k.l!.:i-..l�v'1NA! i. 'e?"�r l�JMIF.4 �.. P, _ '. r:�M1 f.:. II .m.e� 1,,:m'w�f�ll n�:0.1.... .....1 Lh�n nysi 7�lp:,.:-1.r�a. Project Description(include a copy of Assessor's map): Development of a 5-story,85-unit Candlewood Suites Hotel on Franklin Blvd in Glenwood. Includes primary access off of Franklin Blvd,parking for 86 vehicles,drive aisles and loading area;as well as landscaping and a vegetated stormwater Swale of approximately 3,200 sf. • Drainage Proposal(Public connection(s),discharge location(s),etc. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: • On-site stormwater runoff will collect Into catch basins which drain into the proposed vegetated swale. Runoff will be vegetatively pre-treated and allowed to either percolate or evaporate. Storm event flows will flow from the swabs Into the adjacent existing riparian/wetland along the southern border of the site(Reach#4 of the Glenwood Slough). See attached Grading and Utility Plan and excerpt from Springfield Stormwater Master Plan. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Construction phase:Erosion control measures. Development 100%runoff will be vegetatively treated. —(Area below this line filled out by the City and Returned to the Applicant)— (At a minimum,all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted for an application to be complete for submittal although other requirements may be necessary) Drainage Study Typo(EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note,UII may be substituted for Rational Metliodj ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid-Level Development Study—(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Full Drainage Development Study—(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) )nvironmental Considerations: Wellhead Zone: u/A POI Hillside Development: r.)/,, ® Wetland/flpariatr /. ) Wcrr,,.Aas —`iss Floodway/Floodl3lain: r�JA ® Soil Tyne: zb —_ c tt e-rt..l s ',147 [lay 3qe .r7 S: ober Downstream Anal : ' '"nkcs IA -•„ „ t— a N/A �_�` ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design 3•IOL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Matt Stonder @ City of Springfield,email:metouderackspringfield.or.us,FAX:(541)736-1021 Date Received: 10cf11 JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • i COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS • I Pm Official usa only: Alt. •Rased upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum ofwhat is neededjor an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage;however,this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code(SDC)or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval;Additional site specUc information may be required Note:Upon soaping sheet submittal,ensure completed form has teen signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality(EDSPM Chapter 3) Re 'dN/A ❑ All non-building rooftop(NBR)impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated(e.g.multi-chambered catehbasin w/oil . filtration media)for stormwater quality. Additionally,a minimum of 50%of the NOR impervious surface shall be seated by vegetated methods. fl ❑ Where required,vegetative stomiwater design shall he consistent with interim design standards(EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services(BES)or Clean Water Services(CWS). —c .w,.r. AirrJana0r a t< ® ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet,a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the DES for vegetative treatment. ® ❑ if a stormwater treatment swain is proposed,submit calculations/specifications for sizing,velocity,flow,side slopes, bottom slope,and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM ❑ All building rooftop mounted equipment,or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building,shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements(EDSPM Section 4.03) ® ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. O A complete drainage study,as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1,including a hydrological study map. Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event. ❑ This time of concentration(Tc)shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) ❑ ,� �. A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4,C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the • Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code(OPSC). ID Elevations of rho HO.I.and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems(EDSPM Section 4.04) P/1 U Flow lines,slopes,rim elevations,pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, . or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ 5,2 Manning's"n"values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stone pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three(3)feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. • Other/Misc aj ❑ Existing and proposed contours,located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains ❑ Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stomtwater flows from one property to another ❑ ® Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs,with the exception of residential building roofs(EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as requited by the DEQ. Refer to tho.website: www.deo.sate.or.us/wq/ereundwniulohome,hcxa for more information. ❑ Detention pond's shall be designed to limit runoff to pro-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events ' *This form shall be included as an attachment,beside the front cover,of the stormwater study •IMPORTANT.ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN! As the engineer of record,I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set, �Signalize: ' "� " a Date: #/19113 Date Received: 11 of 11 JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • r11.Laenrnern a • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD Springfield, Oregon Prepared For: Alpesh Patel 1857 Franklin Boulevard Springfield, Oregon 97403. Prepared By: TRT Engineering LLC 2636 SE Market Portland, OR 97214 (503) 235-7592 Date Received: April 16, 2013 JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER 1 SECTION A-PROJECT OVERVIEW 2 SECTION B-METHODOLOGY AND ANAYLSIS 2 SECTION C-ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS 3 SECTION D-STORMWATER FACILITY 3 SECTION E-OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 3 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 -FIGURES APPENDIX 2-STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER 3005 Franklin Boulevard Candlewood Suites Motel Stormwater Management Report I hereby certify that this Stormwater Management Report has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets the minimum standards of the City of Springfield and normal standards of engineering practice. I hereby acknowledge and agree that the jurisdiction does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability, or performance of the drainage facilities designed by me. S This document was: OREGON p 26 9 � , s�P* ►Gll3 R. �l Prepared by: eyp 4/301lf Timothy R. Turner, PE Date Received: JUN 262013 Stormwater Management Report Original Submittal Candlewood Suites April,2013 —________ _ Page I SECTION A—PROJECT OVERVIEW Existing Conditions The project is located on the south side of Franklin Boulevard east of the Interstate 5 overpass in Springfield,Oregon within the SW 1/4 of Section 34 and SE 1/4 of Section 33,T.17S., R.3W., WM. (see Figure 1 —Appendix 1). The subject facility consists of Tax Lots 100 and 700. The stormwater drainage treatment facilities are to be constructed on Tax Lot 700. Tax Lot 100 is currently approximately 70%developed with a gravel parking lot and mobile offices associated with a temporary construction operation. The remainder of the parcel is covered with vegetation mostly along the south and west boundary. Tax Lot 700 includes an unoccupied single-family residence and two out-buildings.The buildings are surrounded by lawn and landscaped vegetation. The ground slopes to the south with a gradient less than 5%. There are delineated wetlands along the south parcel boundary. A portion of the subject property is within the 100-year floodplain. Site Soils A February 27, 2013 Geotechnical Site Investigation by K&A Engineering, Inc. indicates the subsurface condition on Tax Lot 700 consist of 2 to 4-feet of dark brown organic silt and/or clay over 4 to 7-feet of fine alluvium. Groundwater surface was observed at 5.2 to 7.8-feet below ground surface. Proposed Development The proposed development is to construct a motel building and associated sidewalks, driveways and parking lots. A public sanitary sewer will be extended to serve the motel. A combination biotreatment and infiltration swale will be constructed to handle the post-development stormwater runoff. The swale will be located near the south boundary of Tax Lot 700 adjacent to the wetlands.The swale will have a high flow discharge spillway which will drain to the wetlands(see Figures 2 and 3, Appendix 1). The swale was designed consistent with the city of Portland Stormwater Manual. SECTION B—METHODOLOGY AND ANAYLSIS The swale sizing is done with the HydroCad version 9.10 hydraulic modeling program (see Appendix 2). No on-site soil infiltration testing was done during the investigation. The test boring nearest the swale location (B-4) showed silt and fine-grained sand to a depth of 4 feet and sandy silt below that. Based on this boring an assumed infiltration rate of 2.0 inches per hour was used for the Swale design. Date Received: Stormwater Management Report JINN 2 6 2013 Candlrwood pages April 2013 Original Submittal. • • Table 1 shows a summary of the modeling. Table 1 Storm Rainfall Peak Incoming Peak Swale Bypass Bypass Event Amount, in Flow, cfs Elevation, ft Elevation, ft Flow, cfs Treatment 0.83 0.16 432.78 434.00 0.00 2-year 3.30 0.77 434.07 434.00 - 0.20 10-year 4.30 1.01 434.16 434.00 0.78 Contributing Drainage Area The contributing drainage area for the Swale is approximately 43,995 square feet(see Figure 2). Downstream Discharge The swale is designed to infiltration the entire runoff from up the treatment storm event. For greater storm events a portion of the treated runoff will flow over the bypass weir to the wetlands. SECTION C—ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS The post-development runoff will be treated prior to infiltration to the underlying soils. Releases to the wetland will be only for storm events greater than the treatment rainfall event. SECTION D—STORMWATER FACILITY The proposed swale location and associated drainage basins are shown on Figure 2. SECTION E—OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The operations and maintenance of the swale is the responsibility of the motel owner, Alpesh Patel. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal Storm water Management Report Candlewood Suites April2013 Page 3 • • APPENDIX 1 -FIGURES Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • • a $1 d "t -0 t ! rct7} Y a t# pEpxte r1o`{I x E �3.R i'�4,-,, xj u rl$ vk! PpraY f4gti�d`r`t , t * q wilt ,ii i 4tev c,"" f Cp "1`v' rt6 ac,-* t 31 diK s r. iit {: tC . �'< rc 0� lz,' � °`it''41�140,1,sYig8At # :� � x'h+5s. l�te, y a Sa kti k if •r '*t }ti: g1 ` : tc!:ic: (f+ ? V c'i i tie t 4 rs+�rt� t t x`-°. n laEi i."{ S,' 114 if. s 3 P ,- Y k� i o'S 'c. -d, _�s � � v % 1H rrh 4 � 9 �t t ru e, !^44, t4tbM1f 4` S ? o Ysp{t i glt- dkk Tr q gF ra y n�w 1S T r v t u<fi.. v 0. ,:ft tk, i33+,{{{Anv d s f t ti m i. ;� i. , 1^ a. i�' t p a n'Ys '� 3+si �! P �§�3"S ' •l°.�L�p n s 1 �^ '.t� �ikK� �u a '4 sa i '4sfT^"� �e 155- k �'�.., 1 kin''-�t i 3 1/�-�$� �)��; �it 9 L ^ 4e a`�1^�P.e'�y, � l � . $i 15tE- et {Mal � y, t t rt rx At hts� y 4 r i� ty aI z'i rt` 3•t r, i �r s td1I k s S lai e t 2- r.x - . riot t C2 , ( Y c Z J ,_ dt ?...-4- �j,Arti4 nS e i fis 3-tt -V �i a t b . i^' ae-e-i IM a_ �!'`A.5 2ll S �`'5 #1,stet¢? a'S ,.' s v . ifirt,,u AttY 9" f n. t t w.._ 'skin _L;' a" w,kizir + Z r,d+, r' 6 Vi r• tid`- i s Y f { P aF.�?�ff7. r i Si.A" t *7 gr a ' ,git,1 t t23 t-3^ x i'Sy. � -;v,, ay'r :e'+..i; e (f7 � �,? '+ x x x Y+ i' "'SA'''irr"4;.�s sT # ''i� >tk�'sTt c(fi yy;i4Ct., c' ''Yt A.'z'i` { 'T" ti , .-s, 7 t rA.1, n.J-Pr Ii ` +t.. `x Kt .•J' r f ru• . ���C .6 -$ RXI0.` u ... �•' VOM�K 4k 4 iP“+ '"t`Jir��S }(j;x ';'' M1- "'4” % ^r y i '`' 4.�A t-.a'zcN n .:fR� .,z (+f2.fat!n"n� K. idONr Fb �s.i �aki u ,;i 1 tv' � S tkxy. - 4 7 aly�Y _k 1' Z ytkr""n y} 9Ln.+N Vk. S}t .c4t,p'� (.GX9r3i aY SAS,7:4=1(,eb i-:x. .x x � "K`'. f� �,� '10, L5, e Y. '.Y.t�s 4 a p< gt'�tt@ �v.'."yn t 'a" 1? 1 o t f'.f Y Y �v.'i y i S;ttl A-• . T' vs/4: �Sytia vyt� eu r dS>aM42.4,1 bbzy+"�" o 7 „AL,xl*' r t +atf!yt 1.1");i'G .lrE y.'i�fi k ¢k6,1 Y Lt4„f i'xt � ,i' YZ J ri n1£` Fx F J sl [„yi .r F -r+ rrr 6b..{ Ytt-Xi cx� v r "5< gr t;. its >'u.d^$. » t 1, (t , t: i1 n 1 1� 'L.A.i.u"t i y„,: x:+ s,r t r -tCW xs '+ F`ti• r �1' ,^ x 4 •"'x.a l `D w k J!`^! Sf' 33y { a t {� r e F K + `" 1 Y`k t�1+` 1 P_ .tT�. yi aiiitA�k.V�4tz t•*,•s1 'v Zn'"Y ,y �Y %�. ti.{{°u` ex` °Ftiti fy, I.:*, sX y . <�i " +4,t'. Mwo"oewaYl et.tlA}-z, e v } 2";it"�.. e in' 6aei' 'zi7.1. ' k•Y z°' f 3 s .,.y. �a.'z' y^1{�`( '� C•t ' ig a t+.v � � F`�.•$LS.fWte .t+'i`3� '"-'11.'t �.,b f �r '���w � u^�+-. sf'� r3 �r Et:? n,it ;y' .1iz., •v.\.w J�q , ix' r fre&k..e @,2C,t fi:..jyy;e't >.. :•: i...;.c; nc F - '�. ,R'jTTi 'Cn - 'Q ra, �i`�,}.:,: ',.k`..,.` '`- , i,4t 4:1 ,�.'r'ISSn+' ° 1'^ '~AZ pt.:* s y 2 ,,y3.0,tt., iJa o-1e .:bY✓ 'T + i'1. x `. '3,ti`}"r : pn 'f {i,A. y'"i:t?: 't"9 t T'ty!,,�4�ii"cV �{a' '� ,i st ij t j 11 ! A i 'L 'ni+Ye l it ' 9 Cy. .. !.. 2 3I t I' ♦ Y L ty t M 4et t j }}h;,;„V'Lt; } .SC i 3 .�ci•f R3 Y 'f '� ?y"."4:� tE t,S 6]t Fg”9 4 bIv S iz �i-� t�F'� 'nevi f e1r xt.�v`` x +�+'t x #� z (.y. }� Y w..#`.5,'s -61'w"aa"a> r:� t {f. 1 ;: Ntr.,: n ni.1 ax .i 1 , ,... aka �sr t n w awa-d µK'^'`' a.i. Zik,:z a, . +t. r �.L- e .rfi �'r AY,ta..S. t ;4; ff 1 �.,��qki' `na, vi• *-'4, 1;:t, 1t .k. ,i - ,, t, j{•A y; w i. t ru'a 2r'`wa i k at .">, r�,e f, , c.:`�a�yS,yrt. '0*p �y'h `�+ r .1y..., t>t^ '' 4-�a-J't,_,z.F.i�z'e�° y �!k.T”`rp 'P KJy't} Sy'T qt.y` th p M�a i� ��y r•* t� 1't4(( �tw k�s ..? '(. ..i.z ipM-i<*{'�F} ,Y` T tT vet"` gyR}Y,xi lr.. 3�4:✓;ii .z r Y� ...... is i M`.. i. Lhe :{. k. _.. l Y .it,� y c:o. ?il r...Y.i■.! >. i. VICINITY MAP date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STORMWATER DRAINAGE REPORT FIGURE 1 SPRING FIGURE 1 4/1/13 _� woY X26) ,,,.,. _ . --- evoTA „.w^.A . "3a I i. 1, MOBUILDING i1 I11 it CATCH, \ 1 ' { :. •, J I.-, i '': BASIN \ I as �� ' I - ( \\\ _�`• I•� t._ � ;I TL 00,_ r iF ' ` I 1 \ I \ !( II J l• ', �• 1 itliuiaiUIIliui sz onna m��, 4A NNS • a �� b, 1 0 rC °a. ;11 .a.441/ V ' \ i ' I \ 1 �♦ I J i I / '< e \, L 939 L — — r'.II 1 433 i ( SWALE \J 'l . ! iI —931 37. Ma \ :I HIGH-FLOW BYPASS ' '` '', - DRAINAGE BASIN_ - — . — . — • — . — . , � , _ I' WETLANDS Date Received; I ' . i JUN 2 6 2013 O 40 'r 801 --- - - — - - —Original Submittal ---- CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STORMWATER DRAINAGE REPORT . . FIGURE 2 SPRING DRAINAGE 4/16/13 III §42 tE ;§m lia 1 St_s.___."ii __,__\.,.., ._, _ .° \\k\ 1.1 111■111 on. il \ ) (,13,. B- A ... . 10 E)\: § t--m,:,., I 11 k�/ , - 7\e lU� / in � r ° �� 7 ,/ ! III/ � ' I. § • * | . -- } '' k' § �f . $^ 3 � K ; , , \ } - a - \ \� ) \ \ I § 22 \ § »� e#111 A rn ' - . ®3 - m @6 RE e, i 1 .4:4 . " /77 '' 777 7772 - 9§ 22 h| \§ • ` , A 5 7| / 5 7 \K \2 h| - ~ : °. mik., \ | g \ § 2 22 / /k ! - , 4 ` / /7 /° [ _ ; ' § /2 \ § / | \§ \§ ^- _ ■ \ •2�� —_ / � \ � \ / - ; Date Received: - , K ! \, \ K \ } , \ /, ,- h5 , . JUN2GZO3 , § g § ■ \ ■ \2 ® 1 ik \| Original Submittal tiny.._Dad • • APPENDIX 2— STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal . • . • • Asziata. smiotz79k, 1111SNO. kibittemie. wsga- t> „4 r.- ,i„ P Roof and parking lot Swale Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal giiikai liceSafi 7:14.6". . 'I.4i OS K w ,:r;faiN. '------S--•-'7 Drainage Diagram for Franklin HydroCAD® by TRT Engineering, Pdnted 4/16/2013 De 9 10 s/n 01507 0 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LW • • Franklin Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 m 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.028 85 landscape (1S) 0.874 98 roof and pavement (15) 0.080 98 swale (1S) 0.982 TOTAL AREA Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.63" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.16 cfs 0.051 af Pond 2P: Swale Peak Elev=432.78' Storage=282 cf Inflow=0.16 cfs 0.051 of Discarded=0.05 cfs 0.051 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outf low 0.05 cfs 0.051 of Total Runoff Area= 0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.051 of Average Runoff Depth =0.63" 2.90%Pervious =0.028 ac 97.10%Impervious=0.953 ac Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary, for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 0.16 cfs @ 7.89 hit, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth> 0.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Area (sf) CN Description • 38,065 98 roof and pavement • 1,240 85 landscape 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area = 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.63" for Treatment event Inflow = 0.16 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Atten= 67%, Lag= 62.7 min Discarded = 0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 432.78' @ 8.94 hrs Surf.Area= 1,160 sf Storage= 282 cf Plug-Flow detention time 33.2 min calculated for 0.051 af(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 31.2 min ( 753.1 - 721.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Sub!V ttel- • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs HW=432.78' (Free Discharge) 'L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.05 cfs) Primary Outflow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=432.50' (Free Discharge) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 m 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.06" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.77 cfs 0.251 of Pond 2P: Swale Peak Elev=434.07' Storage=2,775 cf Inflow=0.77 cfs 0.251 of Discarded=0.13 cfs 0.191 af Primary---0.20 cfs 0.023 of Outflow=0.33 cfs 0.214 of Total Runoff Area=0.982 at Runoff Volume=0.251 af Average Runoff Depth =3.06" 2.90% Pervious=0.028 at 97.10%Impervious=0.953 at Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • . . S • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 0.77 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af, Depth> 3.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Area (sf) CN Description * 38,065 98 roof and pavement * 1,240 85 landscape * 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area = 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.06" for 2-year event Inflow = 0.77 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af Outflow = 0.33 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Atten= 57%, Lag= 30.3 min Discarded = 0.13 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.191 of Primary = 0.20 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev=434.07' @ 8.36 hrs Surf.Area= 2,765 sf Storage= 2,775 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 234.1 min calculated for 0.214 of(85% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 132.9 min ( 795.6 -662.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2765 22..65 2.65.ved: 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 JUN 262013 Original Submittal S • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 O 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 8.36 hrs HW=434.07' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.13 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.20 cfs @ 8.36 hrs HW=434.07' (Free Discharge) t--2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.20 cfs @ 0.60 fps) Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.06" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.01 cfs 0.332 of Pond 2P: Swale Peak Elev=434.16' Storage=3,054 cf Inflow=1.01 cfs 0.332 of Discarded=0.14 cfs 0.206 of Primary=0.78 cfs 0.077 of Outflow=0.91 cfs 0.282 of Total Runoff Area=0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.332 of Average Runoff Depth =4.06" 2.90% Pervious=0.028 ac 97.10%Impervious=0.953 ac Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 1.01 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.332 af, Depth> 4.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Area (sf) CN Description * 38,065 98 roof and pavement * 1,240 85 landscape * 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area = 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.06" for 10-year event Inflow = 1.01 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.332 af Outflow = 0.91 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.282 af, Atten= 10%, Lag= 10.6 min Discarded = 0.14 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.206 af Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 434.16' @ 8.03 hrs Surf.Area= 2,923 sf Storage= 3,054 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 198.5 min calculated for 0.282 af(85% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 94.3 min ( 750.5 -656.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recaic) Elevation SurF.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Extiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Sub nittal, Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 8.03 his HW=434.16' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (ExfiItration Controls 0.14 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 8.03 hrs HW=434.16' (Free Discharge) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.78 cfs @ 0.95 fps) Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • Attachment '10' • 1 G: s C• c ./ rP Department of State Lands �.,. .,Ave , A Ogg®� 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 Salem,OR 97301-1279 John A.{5Vhal+er,MD,Governor (503)986-8200 FAX(503)37818.49 www.oregonstatelands.us October 27, 2011 State Land Board City of Springfield Attn: John Tamulonis, Community Development Manager John A. Kitzhabea MD 225 Fifth Street Governor -. • Springfield, Oregon 97477 ` ✓Alpesh Patel Kate Brown 1857 Franklin Boulevard Secretary of State Eugene, Oregon 97403 Ted Wheeler Re: Wetland Delineation Report for Glenwood, Lane County; T17S State Treasurer _ R3W Sec. 33DD, Tax Lots 100 & 200, Sec. 34CC Tax Lots 500 &700; WD#2011-0219, Springfield, Glenwood Area Local Wetlands Inventory wetland GS-2 Dear Mr. Tamulonis and Mr. Patel: The Department of State Lands has reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. for the site referenced above. Based upon the information presented in the report and additional information submitted upon request, we concur with the wetland boundaries as mapped in Figure 6 of the report. Please replace all copies of the preliminary wetland map with this final Department-approved map. Within the study area, one wetland (totaling approximately 0.40 acres) and no waterways were identified. The wetland is subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. Under current regulations, a state permit is required for cumulative fill or annual excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in the wetland (or below the ordinary high water line (OHWL) of a waterway). This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law only. Federal or local permit requirements may apply as well. The Army Corps of Engineers will review the report and make a determination of jurisdiction for purposes of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit application is submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to both copies of any subsequent joint permit application to speed application review. Please be advised that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Department staff on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal_---- • • This concurrence is based on information provided to the agency. The jurisdictional determination is valid for five years from the date of this letter, unless new information necessitates a revision. Circumstances under which the Department may change a determination are found in OAR 141-090-0045 (available on our web site or upon request). In addition, laws enacted by the legislature and/or rules adopted by the Department may result in a change in jurisdiction; Individuals and applicants are subject to the regulations that are in effect at the time of the removal-fill activity, or complete permit application. The applicant, landowner, or agent may submit a request for reconsideration of this determination In writing within six months of the date of this letter. • Thank you for having the site evaluated. Please phone me at 503-986-5297 if you have any questions. Sincerely, tP.MA-7)/\• Approved by 601.41 Jevra Brown Anna Buckley Wetland Specialist Acting Wetlands Program Manager Enclosures ec: Craig Tumer, Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. • City of Springfield Planning Department(Maps enclosed for updating LWI) Brian Wilson, Corps of Engineers, Eugene office Gloria Kiryuta, DSL Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal , . • • • • ' . ' • •.• 9(4.0.40.:.•..t • r --• '--.. sr, omen? • `--• ' %. - , .1r • re .. •• ....„. ,-; As 1 I : .. . -7 ' • S ' - . . Fr _ -1 •, -- - c - ir •'!' - rAi 1 : - tig,-*„,. _ r. 1 1 . raj . IV •- y 'iirift, 1 * i a r el a _ P• °AZ • ,ti 4443‘ eig..31. t •f - - . ; IIIII 111. I.- 11 hi 7.11.,61. I. to o I I I )3 • . Menlo ,,,, I I 159. - ----et f1,214)01' 4St 1,‘,.. . ;lir> . , - ; • --- - ,... --- ' • - it li ; : , i_o !: ,., :IP 7 ceptanals1 Z • I il -.....- •. . Jt Llano% .. Ch _ i • • . •"'ILEtiNkti, / lila _. •• 15ARK,..• 1 • . . . . . t -141. - • -Til*-:....... . k Br 1,. , 0 el 0 • ! 1 '- /43/44fr.ea i: tk. iht•ti;• : 4:::•• : I. al " .1 t: % ‘ .. 1 te• 1:•,. • i .. ,,I1*./ , . kir • •S•••11* . . . • . „TU.. •. : •... .• ... 1):!, -, .."...h .;•••• : OS- • : . aU • .1•/' I 111,0 I .$ ::.:%%..b.-)&s,_...,... -:--. •rai'ism :: ..1 I,:: I.: :;. . tt.4.• Rad)o Ivo rs S• . ; •..:I• : • : • letin. : : 0.•••-' i -• ' .--- '-'4\:•• (KASH) . ''' ..‘,1 twd • . • ." I -n--, 60. , .. .ir r Study Area 1 ‘...1..;,--,.N 4.,....... , r• -sa:ise- ....*-,kat ... .. ,•••••...; 44•Nd..... • • . i '.• (111:7 0 . IN,...,,..,4041:2.--. -. '• • .......q..;,.... - I 40 : 1 1 0 • • 1`-'7..A_-IW'• ./*** .% . es R044 17•211444. 3a... i: ‘' .--017.,E tc ,3.. '.6.111 1'11• 411111.< owns.". ........}:::•;::: .... . f4..N . I: • -'.. . • . % ' 0/4" RN. 6 • I „rt:r.... .----ir •IF: '2421 IC olg . '• ••: a 4 6 Lanai ?"--- • 1 1 If 6N .% .. • • • I * 4. i: • 'etc` ON agg i' ;la:11P fl .. 7,fr'S-t", ...1. b• . .-",*„.c. ir..:a ... to • ii..... .. AkAr a;,4•-. " SI k, at Ic-i..: .,----.6,•-•.;;;‘,T.'-,... -Ai . • 'V - I eii ,- %.* Pt' % 'CC? : ', % \lg. 7. - - i 5',.....1,%,-....??1•• ..44 ...m. . , , 1 110 :14.:•,... : Li - .. ' - ,• , , ;: ; : • •• leniv se. ty. -, ' • i ..• _- ,- :•11E1 . : . _.._ • %. 1 .. il , , , 1 ,7. •;,%17 h; .,,,: °a/1;,0 t tas '..• + i • • Is • 't t' '‘ . 14_%.)4.14.-1 - _ , \:......., .. _ ,... 7 0 7-:,: hi •:. . 1 -‘`` . s : i_2•• ' ' • E • . -0 1 ivcr.i.%, .1 . ••ir• •V II \\.... •.1, ....•''". --12 11 .111:51-•.- .f* cle'T tat A• 0 aa; J I ( . • * 0."..,:•17: • i'.• i•s s it :1):1. 'II• 1,4-C.:4 i:, .i-,.;1:-...• . , 4 AN •''-' " 443 e • " . ' :. . . . -- -t's .: ( . ' . 1 ‘ ‘ .21I I I ' ..? .; ,..... . . .• • • , . . .. sorin e . • 1 . . wirk 1 t.: .:: .. . ....sv...r.. .1/4. ;.lii. •4..; .T4.. ,r : i , -.7_7- • 3• ,.••••‘3,..t., • .1 ..,... . - , •ie -:: ..' it 1:4 . • ' • •1•1‘. - t•LI •..•• :••. '11 •11•411•,,..,... r• • IC *Si I ) • •' :••••111 1# ;#: -0.:\1 7 i .: i• .... Az(' (4.1 • ' InZ " inisiroi ,.'.... • !...4.Iii ' a.).• rt.': 4 Pan i. '• I. 'lb f 1•• -::::Thk ', . ft ., 6 ••,1 V' / : "I • •• . • • 1 -."A?.?". ‘) :10 63 1' ii ..... ' ' tf\.„..%, 4...• :. ••:•. V...le .."' . I :1%414 ' r. • :'• . N.. & :" • : 4'ch.nt.s:A :- -„.- ii, .•.1. : . ..' i • * , , •.::-:reasli,..\. / i -N, .." . ••,..: "1( , . ,' :4.5 , 1141. 1 i ,k it ak,tin; \I• i 1 - .- -/ P'-'1 ... i i i i T" ''' ' ' .•,,A , • , ' . • • • ".. " . 1 :.#1".'‘ .• ' ' fr . ., et . p ., w .aht._ . ;o . ‘,....- 7 - 1 „ ! no • ., r . " ! - 30/1 'II . i ; • ... • .2:71 , ..ti.. ,, :' . 1.1 .• • '1/4 -;tr - I .1,- , ,,, /,. ‘.... " • , . - . .•,..re...,:z..7:::::::It •.*:. )1/4 . ! 1. .. , / I- • iti:s . ,,, i .1. fic iv l'.. : .m •-It,: ‘■ I. . , es.; /."." ..e--i iti/ /›.-::i.: Cii:C.-. f/ ■ e;‘.....1 I i ) CA...I '-; • : rilrftsttr!:::,-", •N•C I :I.: •-• ,'..... '''. ill% ..'..4, ' -.11C'.' 4 :** .. . 0 4' 41/).'-‘ N:\• ' 112 1 s ' • . se:t' ‘‘N. • I• :j 917.1 ..11 ' . ' ..: t. e., ekk.'. j ): .8 / :;C:. •.••• •• Th• •••• , • .. .-- (- -it:. *t, 6 i, • - Th •c• %. • ' 1:-;. IP: ••••;••-• -- ::••• : .• •• );', • ' % • •:\ •.' • 1.? t• - Laurolvoiod .;•••• 4171:21.:_.:.5.•/..RWL,.;._ .-_. ....1:--.A: i A , • f., AY' I.,; r•-•,, c ; unitipateoticae. !tem...? 0.... t • . .1 ,.. .\......... j...1 . .o 1 . 11, c . A, 'Dale R.(3.6eivei :Mt . , 519/11 4725 JUN 26 2013 , Location and general topography for the City of Springfield si 0 „,„7 St& "4.71,ift al Oregon(USGS Springfield,OR quadrangle,courtesy of virww.digital•topo- maps.com). Dn. WC, 201%- 0 Z I 1 R GIIRF 1 ai•Ms rar- ir --Pacific Habitat Semites,Inc. Wetland 11)elineation for the City of Springfield Site in Glenwood, Lane County, tiego n (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Sections 33 and 34) Prepared for City of Springfield Springfield, Oregon Prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 (503) 570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX June 15, 2011 .° f, y - " �� � ' �4��.are w � n', 1 a � .a.-*, Gam$ "�N `t �a S a � ate:R ceiv i i',, JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site in Glenwood, Lane County, Oregon (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Sections 33 and 34) Prepared for John Tamulonis Community Development Manager City of Springfield 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Prepared by Michele Cccleston Craig Turner Pacific Habitat Services, Inc: 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503) 570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX PI-IS Project Number: 4725 June 15,2011 Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION I II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION I A. Landscape Setting and Land Use 1 B. Site Alterations 1 C. Precipitation Data and Analysis 2 D. Methods 2 E. Description of all Wetlands and Other Non-Wetland Waters 3 F. Deviation from LWI or NWI 3 G. Mapping Method 3 1i. Additional Information 3 1. Results and Conclusions 3 J. Required Disclaimer 4 III. REFERENCES 4 APPENDIX A: Figures Figure l: Vicinity Map(USGS) Figure 2: Tax Lot Map Figure 3: Local Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4: Soil Survey Map Figure 5: Recent Aerial Photograph Figure 6: Wetland Delineation Map APPENDIX B: Wetland Delineation Data Sheets APPENDIX C: Site Photos APPENDIX D: Wetland Definitions, Methodology (client only) Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal__ I. INTRODUCTION Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PUS) delineated the limits of potentially jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the State/U.S. for the City of Springfield site in Glenwood, Lane County, Oregon (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Section 33,tax lots 100, 200, and Section 34, tax lots 500 and 700). This report presents the results of PHS's wetland delineation within the study area. Figures, including a map depicting the location of wetlands within the study area, are located in Appendix A. Data sheets documenting on-site conditions are provided in Appendix B. Ground- level photos of the site are located in Appendix C. A discussion of the wetland delineation methodology (for the client) is provided in Appendix D. IL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Landscape Setting and Land Use The site is comprised of four tax lots located south of Glenwood Boulevard and east of Interstate 5. Tax lots 100, 200, and 500 are owned by the City of Springfield and tax lot 700 is privately owned. PHS identified potentially jurisdictional wetland along the western and southern portion of tax lot 200 and the southern portions of tax lots 100, 500, and 700. The adjacent land use around the site is commercial and industrial. Tax lot 200 is undeveloped with a palustrine forested/open water wetland and upland forest. The northern half of tax lot 100 is construction job site and staging area for the Interstate 5 bridge work. It consists of gravel fill and portable job trailers. The southern half is undeveloped, with an upland forest dominated by red alder(Athos rubra), red elderberry (Snmbucus-racerrtosa), Hinialayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), cow parsnip(Her•acleum maximum), Robert's geranium (Geranium roberliana), and prickly lettuce (Lacluca serriola). There is a small portion of wetland within and adjacent to the south tax lot boundary. Tax lot 700 consists of two houses in the northern portion of the lot, and the central and southern portions are undeveloped. The tax lot consists of mowed lawn and ornamental landscape plants with a forested wetland dominated by black cottonwood (Populous trichocarpus) along the southern portion. Tax lot 500.is an undeveloped lot. The north and central portions of the site consist of black cottonwood, plantago (Montag() latifolia),tall fescue (Feshtca at Tdinacea), Queen Anne's lace (Daunts canna), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), and teasel (Dipsacus sylver•siris). There is a gentle slope along the western and southern portion of the site dominated by English ivy (Hedern helix)and Himalayan blackberry. A forested wetland is located at the bottom of the slope in the southwestern portion of the tax lot. B. Site Alterations Date Received: PHS did not observe any site alterations at the time of the site visit. JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal Wetland Delineation for the City.of Springfield Site/PHS#4725 Pacific Habitat Services;Inc. Page • C. Precipitation Data and Analysis There is no weather station where the site is located in Glenwood, Oregon. As such, weather information in the City of Eugene, located approximately 1 mile west of the site, was used for comparison and precipitation analysis. Recorded precipitation for the City of Eugene totaled 0.90 inches for the two weeks prior to PHS's May 10, 2011, wetland delineation field work and data collection. On the day of the delineation,there was no rainfall. Total observed precipitation for the water year(October 1,2010 through May 10, 2011) was 35.36 inches, which is approximately 79 percent of normal. Table 1 compares the average monthly precipitation to the recorded monthly precipitation in the City of Eugene, as well as to the normal precipitation range, as identified in the NRCS WETS 'fable for the Eugene WSO Airport. As shown in Table 1, recorded precipitation for the month of February was below normal but within the normal range. The recorded precipitation for the months of March and April were above normal but within the normal range. Since the rainfall two months prior was within the normal range, it is PHS's best professional judgment(BPJ)that "normal circumstances"were present at the time of the wetland delineation field work. Table 1: Comparison of Average and Observed Precipitation at the City of Eugene weather station and Eugene WSO Airport WETS Table for the Three Months Prior to the May 2011 Wetland Delineation 30% Chance Will Have Obs• Average seed.. Percent of , Month r Less Than More Than preci itation2 Normal Precipitation., t r p Average Average •February 6.35 4.24 7.60 4.91 77% March 5.80 4.13 6.87 6.24 108% April 3.66 2.30 4.42' 3.78 103% Notes: I. Source:NRCS WETS Table for the Eugene WS0 Airport (http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/Rprcf/support/climate/wetlands/or/41039.1x1) 2. Source:National.Weather Service for the City of Eugene(httn:/Rvww,wrdher.GOvfflimalc/iiulcx.phll vl0=nor) D. Methods PHS delineated the limits of the wetlands on the site based on the presence of wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophyticvegetation, in accordance with the Routine On-site Determination, as described in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Wetlands.Research Program Technical Report Y-87-I ("The 1987 Manual") and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. PHS conducted the wetland delineation and data collection on May 10, 2011. The delineation of Wetland A was based on the presence of hydric soil indicators within the top 10 inches of the surface,hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology indicators such as saturation, water stained leaves, and geomorphic position. • Date Received: JUN 262013 Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI IS II 4725 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Original Submittal Page 2 E. Description of all Wetlands and Other Non-Wetland Waters PHS identified the limits of one wetland within the study area. A description of the wetland is provided below. Wetland A Wetland A is located at the bottom of a slope between residential and commercial properties. The wetland continues offsite, but the onsite portion is 17,453 square feet/0.40 acre. The Cowardin classification is Palustrine Forested (PFO), and the HGM classification is Slope. The sources of hydrology appear to be stormwater, precipitation and groundwater. The portion of Wetland A delineated on tax lot 200 is dominated by Pacific willow(Sally lasiandra) and red osier dogwood (Cor/u s sto/onifera). There were also several inches of ponded water at the time of the delineation. The portion of Wetland A on tax lots 100,,500 and 700 is forested and consists of black cottonwood, Oregon ash (Fraxinus lat/'folia), and slough sedge (Carex obnupta) (as characterized by Sample Points 3, 4, and 5). The adjacent upland vegetation (as characterized by Sample Points 1, 2, and 6) includes red alder, Himalayan blackberry, English ivy,poison hemlock(Contain' nraculatum), prickly lettuce, selfheal (Prunella vulgaris), and creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). PHS based the delineation on the presence of saturation within 12 inches of the soil surface, hydric soil and hydrophytic vegetation, which coincided with low spots in the topography. F. Deviation from LWI or NWI PI-IS reviewed the 2010 Local Wetland Inventory (LWI) map for the Glenwood Area of Springfield. The LW1 map identifies the wetland delineated on the site as GS-2. The wetland. mapped on the LWI is slightly larger than what P1-IS delineated in the field. This is likely because the delineated wetland boundaries were surveyed with sub-centimeter accuracy as compared to drawing the boundary on a larger scale map with an accuracy Of+/- 25 feet. G. Mapping Method PHS flagged the boundaries of the wetlands with blue surveyor's tape. Data points were flagged with lime green surveyor's tape. The wetland flagging and sample points were survey-located by the City of Springfield. The estimated accuracy of the survey is sub-centimeter. H. Additional Information None.. I. Results and Conclusions PHS identified-one potentially jurisdictional wetland within the study area. The total area of wetland is approximately 0.40 acre within the site. The wetland has a Cowardin Class of Palustrine Forested (PM) and an HGM Classification of Slope.The wetland continues off site to the east, west and south of the study area. Date Received: Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI IS#4725 JUN Z 6 2013 Pacific Habitat'Services,Inc. Page 3 Original Santa?.ttal. • J. Required Disclaimer This report documents the investigation, best professional judgment and conclusions of the investigators. It is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge. It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination of wetlands and other waters and used at your own risk unless it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Oregon Department of State Lands in accordance with OAR 141-090-0005 through 141-090-0055. III. REFERENCES Adamus, P.R. and D. Field. 2001 Guidebook for Hydrogeomorphic (HGM)-based Assessment of Oregon Wetland and Riparian Sites. Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Riverine Impounding and Slopes/Flats Subclasses. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem, OR. Hitchcock, CL and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Nortwest:An Illustrated manual. University of Washington Press. Munsell Color,2000. MunselLSoil Color Charts. Gretag-Macbeth,New Windsor, New York. National Resource Conservation Service Eugene WSO Airport WETS table for Lane County. http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/ftpref/support/cl imatehvet lands/or/4I 039.txt National Weather Service Climate Data. hnp://wtwtw.ireather.gar/c/imate/index.php?twfb=nrn• NRCS Web Soil Survey, 2011. Online Mapping for Lane County, Oregon. Oregon Department of State Lands. September 2001. Removal-Fill Law (ORS 196.800-196.990) and Removal and Filling in Scenic Waterways (ORS 390.805-390.925). ORMAP.org tax maps. 2011. http://www.ormap.org/ Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. 2010. City of Springfield, Glenwood Area Local Wetlands Inventory map. • Reed, Porter B.,Jr., 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL.NERC- 88/18.37. US Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Gores of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region, ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar,and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS:: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U.S. Geological Survey, 201 Springfield, Oregon, topographical quadrangle. Source: www.digital-topomaps.com. Date Received: Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI IS.#4725 III►I ry 6 013 Pacific habitat SerYices,.Inc. JUN G Page 4 • Origin9i Suth,'id aL. — . . • • 9 0 A+ A t ..!sP, e it ix i a v. Figures .ir ctzt- . 4.4 c: c f•S' ' t- - r,,, kr: , 1. -.4 1. ,14). It , , 1 i A ,a... "ify., k,' • \Ss.t.'! . .. i : 1 tt i I i i i -%,,.4 off ,x'•,' ite.+-.1 . * ., _rii,,,-,c,--,,,,..:1-, ' 40-',1.. N. ,fi.../. ..„4„. -,r.,..- .. -k, — . ,..2. . - "bR , ived .,,,,,,r,:,:v}k",10.?"...-:-. f , 4 , t' .:-;*‘.4;fek,-7.i.- i---%..,,,,c,--• .i.E- .ravtr....e: 4:cot....”*. k .'"'.:fi...s, JUN 2 6 2013 „4- 1 -# --%. 1 Original Subirtittal_ • • ..t.-- ._ . i' .. . ' /,) ., ! , . . . , - si.'• i .1?fi 1 ( ' 1"�z I r1 It ryr ' 4 1 • V1 s[ 'Iu HM -•ks)r "'. 'L '—� '1 ~,, j, 2, ,. • . ?1.3 _,d` } ` mil 1 ' ` ' '1•= _ 111r 1 -I tAer,lu( iw 5+3 1` f NI t i;i,, 31;o .'1/4' �,,II _ �1. : I:a...g1 12,.•,., y.r •r 1.ttonni111 .0e,, b t �1 - � ,. • •'' ks i t , f s L f 1 + ` g: . _... '• . 1 w!. - au j,r, _ r N �d _ ; , Study Area ��i .., .... • ,` • + 4 I-Sewage • tit .4 - r- J.__% _ hsposal' . • z .. s • • :.. ; '-' 7 - ,.. 2-t-tig. 1-1_,-3. -1St cp___,, ,,i * ! . ,,• .r 1 am� ' l " ' Park a , 1 t :• -�.•&"I! • ' ^ A '. �• 1■ •• ..,"i� • jF .`�+•fir: f B. 4�`:,r='-• •. i X 11 . ' _ •11 «.. )I in. .� J :4-•.-; •1 '' 1 • -71 ;? ,;me N' ice`• F,`,� , n J udk1 ..IU1011�IV ••�' L. 1 1►-,- O 1' P ik •" i . •. r�: i .i .'""---11.."'-:- • I i 5: itt x•1:4 "• , •t`\ F�.� fir' _ 11'',V1:4,-;* ..l t. 1� ' F-• ••1 +�,+ • L, . . ti ;ti,�, :r._=' • I -• ,LA1yy .• Z -: 1 k .n q° «'f:•-• . ..; .... . �., II \ --,�-..,,•�•' _1....4.1._•- . ' l Ti I i YI 165'A r't I' 1 //• 'r T�iR'=:+ )4 , •T N 440 • ;• a..� L ltarle.l• J- • 3 I i • iii. :1 5/4• r4.'- • i / ..:.1. >C4-.\ I [t.? ti . ,-• '. gg!rtes •,l T1 = -, ,' ; '1. 1, ! tloitl ?\ L_,,,.''.1.144‘;.. _, ,•lr.e.•. 't U. V. . - :1, • f� x ., Pork • t , i fi a,• / 1 ty ' 1 • 1•.. . tit : N. I, �+ r-_ . ;J ' J• \ .,•�;i f k -.'r ', t ! l • \.......,1 ( jti• i t _ . :%14,•_"1..'___,.• 'v 10;it' •' _ " ! ' !'' i. `� ,! , ,,,: LaUrolarwd ';1: II± ,•�,_:3-- _ ,.i.1 I• ' `t •, unIupal•loll. oeae ; / ...: . 4 .. .-� . I '/ 11i; ;, , _ y i 5/9/11 4725 Location and general topography for the City of Springfield site in Lane County, FIGURE Oregon (USGS Springfield, OR quadrangle, courtesy of ww100-tdatia—Ved: 1 maps.com). 11ii cc —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. � .J'�'N�' 2 0 n13 Original Subf ;tta1_ ---- • • Y ixl• 1 Li C 4 V t V +/) Q r+ a n -0 ea artnnnrra = Cli r1 V I..,o Q M � .� / - r- a w � •O U •NI Lrl a. / 0 • OD a i p r a•. Ct , kl CL fe \I; ■ . / . f _s 114 -' 1ca ` Li r .r it t L '1 ,, t ` '1."-y� i e t / ;11 C� lr _ 'ii...,.44 li ' / qv ....94 %▪."-'-.. •. vir.t.l. , . ..: . , : % - - , — . . co ,,, ._ .. ..,,,, t.,„ ... z, . .4.,.. i 1% vo 0 t 0 V; l / ' T▪ v--r 7Ar—' 1,11.1811V-1 Q:il 7 7, i ,...,.• ..• . .... I 1 I . I'l ;i •til_lilj .TiD - r_zni-d # -.7`.:-'1-,,,,,To--1 ::i.,-,--. .-1, .. ii, 4'4 _ . .L. co ED 4 ./ . .1.t‘' i. ,r• ir . j I - 1 7A1r M�IAAIIf ! U / , f = r- -- -- ---,— a, 1 " ;`f + i o o is ca. V) '• a). n t•if a I0 f2102 Q V . x fl'• i. ■ t� , Date Received: w JUN 2 62013 Y 0 "' pinal Submittal , . * • LID ' II 1-- :'. C.; C c;, V V t V V) rl 8 1-4 vi ..... re Is gm el rig tit .4. r,) PI Z. L., \ C) CD = I.1 2 0 c::. cre re a. -4- -J -I-- (1) • ;-■ c-) • .• "‹ CC C.0• '... .1 r.-- ;.. .. :1 1 I I— S+ ... ,, ro _ ep ■——..i-- - -----.77.17:----:%.,==r1r_"'''."."-+*--_"-^',r a%I.:—•-:.—..,,,e!,..—.. \ in ,, ...._—- 1,-;-----.....• 7;0.1' ' . 0 M I 2 i= II •i. -- ._ —---- — — 1 i D- 0 !: ...,,.. . ..; I - . — — ..— —- . -— • as - - •- -- ,...- ef _ii ._ A - a ''''.— r- . It fi, - .Je • • r * ,..... A 1 ti 1 :f f 1,4 2 „ .■ i f r ,' R '—'g . . - ; i 2 r —-— —t.t7-,-... 7"/— -- • ,./ F Tu ".., ere r. -c , 01 .-F-Li--..e.,"4-1,--. — -l— 4 • CL ....... "a ,....° ,, 74,,. .....3, ., .........• i: Z( a. I 1 --.'-I-" 4 ,.•i / .1' ,,.; ,,.. / 1 3 I• - 0 i . , 4 . * M =n .- •.Ir CO II M.31S ...6 ° X CL CCI ,Cti I— .. Date Received: JUN 2 6 7013 UJ CO N--- Origin al Submittal ........ LL • • Glenwood LWI Map (A-1 ) ;.N!.11 Study Area i GS_1 . • Y • % GS `i AGS-3 r; • virigisitli GSA • c;S-4 Lw,.1.e Wilco,Of'Inn.. 1 Ms ` 1M a..- • 1.^ •.....- .• wuw..erw..� ; 1. __ ,.. Cow.rdln 0•14104454.1 _ et..... c•v KY 1•r.r •.t war.. iy rut 0,4 Nowa Warm..Pow-. ..11.N (—j a•.a.••••1.werr •• Sheet 2.Glenwood Area of$poingllold Local Wetlands Inventory of.,-P„:..p ,-w+r:•^n•n.-q.bw•-yr pnaw w-•..nwrz- -...•n•-•,P ikith a 20D lost j, rN+,. I 1 ...is.......r4..-40...Ywy/ 1..4:✓W.W.•YHrw.•.W,.,w.wYli. �, ._ / _.....M.1•..NY 1...•V........or 1.1•f .wY+I YM.-IFP i...1.4:11. ••• 1.740-r•tt#.r O 16.Plot1-ra10'Y1r 1.r..•rre..l.w.1*Int rP.n - - _.,. . • , 4�p 1 OW Fall 11 ..•,e.$1.a..••s..Oapw.n•. y.,.,.... 1`Ina .,,.r.ya.sl.v. =-• 4725 5/9/1 1 V i A.l e.1411,(•.•..1•.r•. .....1...4W. Local Wetlands Inventory of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon FIGURE (City of Springfield, Glenwood Area LWI, 2010). Date Received: 3 .,, . — Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. AM 2 G XI13 Orig!naI Sub,.%;itili _ - -_. . . S 0 10 9\111111 04 1*-- • •r. t.; -ts >, 1:1 X — i z° 7 .., ,..._ ,., 111, .74■1wrfi, –, V--1-4-11r Ir .,7■11r--I N;,.. . -a v) .... • - • - ... ---- — i L. . *i X a ! ., V 1... - ' 2 .6,L •,41 i. _ , 4 a — F t 1 AWOL.- .,, e .',- .A.ri— , r .., - . . ) o Z , as • ; • ,-.. .t .• I .. . / —.11.-,_ mu _ -,, .• .11L- A .4-' (441 CV kc: ii 4-ei,. . - i , Iriii — -I • iz o 71. o a) 1 1 ' E i .11 .4–wIll; I . IMI i - .t.aiii0 - o co ct) 41, ,1.-. . F...., 66* .....„ : , J • — C ...=. 7•-■ CI CO RI .0 R - 1 '1 I l- a) alit•• ... . -'• - .1 . .1. , • tSS. 0 ,' , I ''.'' : 1 a) 4. t. 4•-E, _ ,... 4 CO - y ce‘ --.. 1,6-•, N -de li• .• I . 'Pia 41=1, ilgi MIN. 1111111111 ' , = .y. C I . CO) -.IP-t1- " ' " " -....NO '-........ .. ..". . l ' 4' 4) > = 0 1 r I lil . . U Z 11P4r I I 62) . . „.... _ . . Z:s -A, ' .....■ //// 441010111117. CV ON k Mlle‘5.. , 2 t ...111.-' it.„, ,.../ c F , i I CS ;1111114011i "/ i . jz- y ci, ...,. al. , I ._ T_-• \ ' /C3 - /, .',;# ilk \ ■ ... _...., ,...// • & / = try, .. ....j2.-".---.0,- , 1 •• \ ' Itis 4 ,,, \ ."" , / k / o.. cf) .._ ' . te _ -. di MO;" 4.---‘ ..gr--- ' ..; .. ›, .? .... • - -..- - - -...... t I i 1 1 1L f–_ ..P.--,. 0 /0 m • - _ -1 ,2 • . . v >an> , U) i = -;,z 0 . i . /4.7." –.116.----1 -, ----%-- ii lodik, (f) r .- . • -‹—, -, , • 4.',. ...,44,. •I r. 1 s ■ LIJ Date Received: ct •C:t. s- 0 JUN 2 6 2013 • origin-I ii TI.. 0 0 it • ; + f Study Area ' ,g, k' mi.+ ,.rte"` t si,. �-of 1 + " t 1 ' ,.1 •ke. olik 1 '@, 1 ar�al►erl i lc/. , it„ -tom �.� r 1 r. �l ,.. 1. r / !ii re ' 4 orAas ► j + r i i - ' • tigioo. . I!, .. . it uQ, A ,, , , 1,. "74* '"., i ! .,". -r► .,s .4. % 4 1, I ' +1 v {[ F ��11t -' ii',ttt3ou(1'o I ' �4 ,II ,. `•1O u ` a •,�. . I a' _: .ii' - let 44 C4:'?91' _Ion as'4 e4f B6)' r.r, 41g IA Ey0'ell 264+14.1 5/9/11 4725 Recent Aerial Photograph for the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon FIGURE (GoogleEarth, 2005). Date Received: 5 j." A —Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. JUI$ 2 6 ton Original S . i.fts ---- . . • Mr __ I \::-, ----- • . t } V. :,‘ / 4 ,... ..... ,,,.. till \ . , — .- __ ---____ . . • , ... -----,...,; .i, • i -- • .,, 1 -------. .\k',\1 I , , ....----•-........___._-- _all --sol .., •-". -I or. INII _ ! ). \\ X < a 41,,, iii) ! Z --MO < 6 - „, kF3 w F1 /11,. ■11 & f 1:' ■ (I.., § 1.-.7';jt IR' I - i': •: '' fi ' 2 !,'/. 1-ii4,.' tu•---- 5--,.--A,; 'OM . :I /.!,' ..._ :Ii' i I.( 1,, 1 1 1 . 1 t ft' --....•;). i)j1 i‘\12--' ' ro .116 0, 1.2 •• ilg ..11 \\-- -'' ...„... .11..U.DX&REA/al/VARY .' a. :,0 Er ? '.›-, 0 -.-, ..... ..-0'.... ' . 1 a) C 41) \IF t ;i; ' K i UM 1 1 I a 3 E E 3 ..--7 .....• . ..-• - -q — r:-..,____.-- .. ...,,__ !„......— 0 c ... ....... _. __. ,..... I , ip ......-.".„.. — vc 0 1 ......- % g :.... •. :, di i , . • ... -',' ' :•.:::: ' ..' .' / i :•:::::; / (...5\ 0 ...J ...., ,i.81\ .• ____ .- ... ... • u to• :• • e ;) 10I -0 E •,, t ' . _ --'3D : : --I ) ----. (Si; e, o m • :* = ,\\ J V el • . .0. 1 I 0 ,..,,.% 1_...1... _ _ -0 ...... ---, cp 0 ; 7 r4 " r:, .,.,,i, 1 , .• :::•.- 15 ..-- 3 ,,t.,, ,, ‘',. ,,,, .•:::::- 1 ,‘.rq •.4+ sl,..1 01 ."-A."....''',•,„ -.IL.' — C ';''':';''\ 7 ' '''---) ' ------, ..z.7-----'•-----....._----..., -', 0' — -;-. TU. ''' • \ '.' t" Ok N', \ lc-" --------7:-.-----• I N / Itr, .... — 1', •--. o ' s ';A-• 0. ...., _, ,...4 II ...-• (1 C ii •-/ IZIP , LI C . 6 ...---,,,,, lt 0 i•-• -0 -.1 k \ ° e••■•■•,%\ V 17\ L.) \11\k\\. „" ti,„ • -- \ • 0 ta ca \ 13 ,k % •.. (' ...,--• ■ ,, ,...-„,-. : i• (C3 _I 8. ;--i 0 ....... c c •- ...4,,,i, ■ \\'‘ .,• k V- •, f..) f-.... 0- ., t.. 4. !.s \ , \i, • ,. , : / I .•4 .,.) ,J.... < c r.V) ti 0 "\ 67-11 ' \\ 11" \ i /2 c ...- .4 ,.._____- -- , 1,11. ( -S\ \i\ i ‘.. mu 1 714/), n,\,. N k .), 7( , --5 '... ›. -- 0 0 .- c ,...., 44: •,ck ...--„,„..., 1 --, 0 - n u D 0 z • Vs.., 1.101'1 1 •., . 1 < ft cr, co ...... 10 ' 3 . 1% C 0 -0 :-..-: ...., .- 'Tikii(y ----- .', '''V , t , D , 9 cn ._ 00 _ ,„,.. Ivvy 0•, , li.1 n. n. I Or \ (1 r .. ..A:.... _ \(. 1-Th ) \.. klici.,1 : %., '• :,k,N . ." \ •.)'Y i ,-..„.........._,..-----.'"-----•-•`' Li Cr ) \ :-'------ \ sk& / • . ' i A \ ---1.., -------- --)Cf , :il • ) D (11) 4 .1 .. A it.' • 6....- ......, i ( I . - ,...___ CT- \, •, 1 / rk4 it • ,.. -.,,'.,',•A 11,, \ .' I (Ali . ' i :.:, , ,, ,-, 1, . ' ANN■ • • Ap lir, en •, ix �i> Wetland Determination Data Sheets i it e , T. P H S Y ""°0 r1 t x h i* ‘11?-1.:`+, 4 ■ I/4\)• iqlF n i �a `*xt , le' Data:Received -` ` r ..f.__-,'" JIJI� _'� ' Original Submittal • • • PHS# 4726 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield CitylCounty: GlonwoodlLano Sampling Date: 511012011 Applicant/Owner City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point 1 Investigator(s): M EcciestonlC Tumor Section,Township.Range:. T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let: 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Newberg-Urban Land Complex NW Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (if no,explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? (YIN) Y Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? It needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Area within Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status. Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 ) Number of Dominant Species 1 Alnus rubra 20 X FAC That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 • 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata:. 2 (8) 20 =Total Cover $aolinclShrub Stratum (plot size:_) Percent of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL.FACW. or FAC: 100% (NB) 2 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by:, 5 OBL Species x 1= 0 0 a Total Cover FACW species x 2 0 FAC Species x 3= 0 Kerb Stratum (Plot size: 6. ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 Gall=aparine 6 FACU UPI Species x 5= 0 2 Conlum maculatum 40 X FAC Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 Lactate serriola 10 FACU 4 Solanum au/samara 3 FAC Prevalence Index=WA= #DIVI01 5 Lamium amploxicaule 2 UPL 6 _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 t-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8 X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 60 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Woody Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic X� d %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 20 Vegetation YeS_ Date Received. Present? Remarks: JUN 1'6 2013 original SUbri:i al III • SOIL PHS q 4725 Sampling Point 1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Cofer(moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks 0-15 10YR 312 100 Silt Loam Rocks and bricks In soil profile IType:C=Concentration,D=Deptetion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Hislic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA ti Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Cloyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(16) Depleted Dark Sudace(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Cloyed Matrix(S4). Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: None Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present?' Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:Check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Sudace Water(A1) Water stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89) High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 48) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(011) Drainage Patterns(810) Water Marks(81) Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(02) Algal Mat or Crust(84) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(85) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(CB) Fac-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soft Cracks(B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Yes No X - (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections).it available: Nono Date Received: • Remarke: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • • PHS# 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 5/1012011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 2 Investigator(5): M EcclostonlC Ttimer Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hinslope,terrace.etc.:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let: 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DO Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NW Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (if no,explain in Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil._ or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances'present? (YIN) Y Are vegetation — Soil_ or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Aroa within Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) o =Total Cover Saolino/Shrub Stratum (plot size:_) Percent of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL,FACW, or FAC: 100% (NB) 2 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: q Total%Cover of Multiply by:' 5 OBL Specks x 1= 0 o =Total Cover FACW species x 2= 0 FAC Species x 3= 0 Herb Stratum (plot size:. . 6 ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 Prunella vulgarls 20 FACU UPI Spades x 5= 0 2 Hypochaerls indicate 3 FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 Agrostis stolonirere 'eo X FAC 4 Hyperlcum perforatum 2 UPL Prevalence Index=Bra= #DIV1OI 5 Carex sp. 5 (FAC) 0 Solanum dulcamara 2 FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation a X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 112 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is 5 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Woodv Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Welland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic HydrophylicVegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydrae sot and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Vegetation Yes Date R beiv/Pf ' Present? Remarks: JUN 2 6 2013 Orlglnat but:vital • • SOIL PHSa 4725 Sampling Point: 2 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 312 100 Silty Clay Loam 8-13 10YR 212 100 Silty Clay Loam 13-17 10YR 212 100 Sandy Loam 'Type:CeConcentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils': Histosol(A1) Sandy Redox(55) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(SO) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain N Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(Fe) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None Depth(Inches): Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) Water stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89) High Water Table(A2) 1,2.4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA?,2,4A,and 48) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B11) Drainage Patterns(810) Water Marks(81) Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(CO) Drift Deposits(83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(84) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(03) Iron Deposits(85) Recent Iron Reduction In Plowed Soils(C6) Fac-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Sot Cracks(86) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(07) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (Includes ceaoary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections).if available: None- ®ate Received: Remarks: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • • pHs. 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region ProjecuSite: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 511012011 Apelicant/Owner: City of Springfield Stale: OR Sampling Point: 3 Investigator(s): M EcelostonlC Turner Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hlllslope,terrace,etc.:) Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Lat: 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NW Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for rats time of year? Yes Y No (if no,explain In Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology __significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? (Y/N) Y Are vegetation _ Soil_ or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Area within Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X' No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 - That are OBL,FACW,or MC: I (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 _ Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 0 =Total Cover S ofn /Sh bStr t. (plot size:_) Percent of Dominant Spades 1 That are OBL,FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) 2 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by: 5 OBL Species x t= 0 0 =Total Cover. FACW species x 2= 0 . FAC Species x 3= 0 Herb Stratum (plot size: 6 ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 Carex obnupta 50 X OBL UPI Species x 5= 0 2 Prunella vulgars 20 FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 Fraxinus lat/folla 10 FACW 4 Solanum dulcamara 2 FAC Prevalence Index=B/A a #DIV/01 5 Carex sp. 20 (FAC) 6 . , Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation S X 2-Dominance Test Is>50% 102 a Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is 5 3.01 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Weodv Vine Stretum (plot size: ) data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 �— 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric sok and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydropftxtiic} p %Bare Ground in Herb Stretum. VegetaM R A Le ecce. ` d:x No Present? Remarks: JUN rf C 2013 ^rsg;naLJe+l./,fr!_`-:.D; LD • • SOIL PHS# 4725 Sampling Point: 3 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Lot Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 312 80 10YR 4/4 10 C NI Silt Loam _ 10YR 311 10 R M 4-18 10YR 412 85 7.5YR 4/4, 15 C NI Sandy Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RMeReduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. °Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydrlc Sell Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for.Problematic Hydrlc Soils': Hislosol(A1) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(MO) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(excepl MLRA 1) Very Shallovi Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Cloyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(M2) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Musky Mineral(S7) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Cloyed Matrix(S4). Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer Of present): Type: None Depth(Inches): HydricSoll.Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) X. Water stained Leaves(89)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89), High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 4B) X Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(010) Water Marks(81) Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry,Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat of Crust(84) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(85) Recent Iron Reduction In Plowed Soils(C6) X Fac-Neutral Test(05) Surface Soil Cracks(86) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wafer Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 8 Yes X No (includes century fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: None Date Received: Remarks: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Stihrtiittal 411 III PHS If 4726 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: GlonwoodiLane Sampling Date: 6110/2011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 4 Investigator(s): M EcciestonlC Tumor Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hiilslope,terrace,etc.:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let: 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam WWI Classification: Are climatic hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (U no,explain in Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? (YIN) Y Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts,Important features,etc.. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No is Sampled Area within Hydric Son Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 ) Number of.Dominant Species 1 Fraxlnus latlfolis 30 X FACW That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Skate:. 1 (B) 30 =Total Cover SaolinalShmb Stratum (plot size:__) Percent of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL.FACW, or FAC: 100% (NB) 2 3 Prevalence index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover.of Multiply by: 5 OBL Species x 1= 0 0 =Total Cover FACW species x 2= 0 FAC Species x3= 0 kerb Stratum (plot size: ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 UPL Species x5= 0 2 Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 4 Prevalence Index=B/A= #DIVI01 5 6 . Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8 X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 0 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is 5 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Woody Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) I 5-Welland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and weUend hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 70 Vegetation Yes X No Present? Datc Roccivcd: Remarks: JUN 262013 n.h-.:..._f c„r.,, ,-,40,1 • SOIL PHS a 4726 Sampling Point: 4 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Typal Lots Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 2/1 50 10YR 314 50 C M Silt Loam 6-17 10YR 411 50 10YR 3/4 50 C M Silty Clay Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix.CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Locatlon:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Miners(F1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain In Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Sudaee(Al2) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) s Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(54) Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(Al) X Water.stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89) X High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 48) X Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marks(B1) Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(84) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shalow Aquitard(D3). Iron Deposits(85) Recent Iron Reduction In Plowed Soils(CB) Fac-Neutral Test(05) Surface Soil Creche(BB) Stunted or Stressed Plants(01)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections).if available: None Date Received: Remarks: JUN 2 6 2013 .Original Submittal • • PHS# 4726 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region ProjectSite: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 611012011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 6 Investigator(s): M EcciestonlC Turner Section.Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hilslope,terrace,etc.:) Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): 'Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Lat: 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum; DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam Non Classification: Me climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (if no,explain In Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil_ or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? (YIN) V Are vegetation _ Soil_ or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Area within Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 ) Number of Dominant Species 1 Populus frlchocarpa 75 X FAC That are OBL.FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 75 a Total Cover Saolino/Shrub Stratum (plot size: 5 ) Percent of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus latlfolla 30 X FACW That are OBL.FACW, or MC: 100% (NB) 2 3 Prevalence index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by: 5 OBL Species x 1= 0 . 30 a Total Cover FACW species x 2= 0 FAC Spades x3= 0 Herb Stratum (plot size: ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 UPL Species x 5= 0 2 Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 4 Prevalence Index=8/A= #DIVI01 5 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6 X 2-Dominance Testis>50% 0 =Total Cover 3-Prevatenca Index is 53.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting y/oodv Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or one separate sheet) 1 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 a Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric sot and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic °A Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Vegetation Yes p No Re ate Present? dceived: Remarks: JUN 262013 • . OrtginiT Sub S.i'ai___„_,. 41 41 SOIL PHS ft 4725 Sampling.Point: 5 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Rados Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) IS Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0.4 10YR 3/2 100 Silt Loam 4-18 10YR 312 80 7.5YR 414 20 C M Silt Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or.Coaled Sand Grains. °location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(A1) Sandy Redox(55) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Eplpedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA t) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain In Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Rados Dark Surface(F6) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Rados Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: None Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) X Water stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA X Water stained Leaves(89) High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 48) (Except MLRA?,2,4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marks(91) Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4). Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(65) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(C6) X Fac-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soil Cracks(86) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(DS)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(Inches): Water.Table Present? Yea _ No X Depth(inches): >18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >18 Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Date(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous Inspections),if available: None Date Received: • Remarks: JUN 2 C 2013 nrigil+ai Sr Ibex l S • PHS# 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Pro)ectrSite: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane. Sampling Date: 511012011 Applicant/Owner City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 6 Investigator(s): M EcclestonhC Turner Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hllislope,terrace,eta:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Lai 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (if no,explain in Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil_ or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? (Y/N) Y Are vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yee No X Is Sampled Area within Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 0 =Total Cover 5aolina/Shrub Stratum (plot size: 6 ) Percent of Dominant Species 1 Crataegus douglasil 5 X FAC That are OBL,FACW, or FAC: 33% (NB) 2 Rubus discolor 15 X FACU 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by: 5 _ OBL Spades x1= 0 20 =Total Cover FACW species x 2= 0 FAC Spades k x 3= 0 Herb Stratum (plot size: 6 ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 fedora helix 70 X UPL UPL Species x 5= 0 2 _ _ Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (a) 3 4 Prevalence Index=B/A= #DIVI01 5 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8 2-Dominance Test is>50% 70 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' • 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Woody Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Welland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Date Received: No X %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 Vegetation Present? JUN yff f� Remarks: JUN 2 6 2013 on-)nr!.'i il'ifr;4}F,1 SOIL PHS 0 4725 Sampling Point: 6 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) -Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Typer Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-11 10YR 313 100 Silt Loam 11.17 10YR 313 100 Silty Clay Loam Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(55) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F8) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Cloyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None Depth(inches): Hydric Soli Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) Water stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89) High Water Table(Al) 1,2,4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marks(81) Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(02) Algal Mat or Crust(84) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(03) Iron Deposits(85) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(C6) Fat-Neutral Test(05) Surface Sot Cracks(06) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(08)(LRR A). Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(07) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (includes capillary binge Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring wet,aerial photos,previous inspections),if evadable: None Date Received: Remarks: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • AHits Iii e1II4iDC C ii Site Photos \,7,...,/14-,/ , , ' i .a r c 4 ''''': \ j, . ,.. xi =fi "� .f m X r �*�' �., trK' 't.' '4 t i��ri dnzcassl, ■. 11 1 n , w er Date ;ems vet i w 6 r `. n k' .._.: to c4 . `tc, r� t"it t�x _fir°wo„..? '. ,.Th ..to) JUN262013 Ori it ! 9 'tilttel. • • :„,z, 7 . ,G, -$•� , • y % •, ,."- • ',, , ' _ off` • ♦ Photo A• ` �� Photo was taken looking• • • - 1 to ` •: ' • . - • southwest at the ponded „±.. . -.:°iv 4 j{�-r.+,F4; I : "_ portion of Wetland A. t.�iw' .4'',a - ' :;'.• • 7- ---'. .,r•; -.74. k- . itit. � 4�, f'' '._w . -. $_• !,. . i'',. `,,a.1+! .• • Vii. , ',, ''- .,„4'frr- • �,''. `. ,. . P. It'. 'S . ' / ,a Photo B .,�..-. -; -S.• '.4 ,I1'. . ,,f 4.. Photo was taken looking a f, �i • ,} ,, northwest at the ponded ( �" s:.; :,, •;t'•+l' . *1?..."' . i . ', portion of Wetland A. •* Yr gr• 4ili4,0 ' i gyp r 1 t' . . , • . 4 F ja = f•■ y a n. •,, vJi.i ., r ?, .. • ,1 4 i, `C.-,..- — , ,y; a •�. tr,+y.. ....1 iii j. ,- s;3 /,,r0* ? • �, .'T'.••• 'ip J i _ . -., �`xil_ . ` ` -y 1`11• `+� r ,yttw r • F . n° f. _ ~ft, Protect#4725 612/2011 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, 1P14,0ep. on May 10, 2011. JUN 2 5 2013 —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • • i. � •',.,ti '‘ r ; i 1 i 3� : " - �'1 '"- Photo C ;'dt'�}'4 I., .t'; _=•- ' . 4 r ± i�,9 .;I v. -; Photo was taken looking 't ,��, :' •.i. Y ,>, ., �r west at Wetland A. ∎ r � , ct y - 7f, *, •1 .4 , ‘ li, ..41010.7 _ ,4,4i.{ . r , � - .�•'..alb-`'' y d..;:111- :.'" g - fi "r. , ♦' r. ....:-...--sir 2 :4rs .0:li,-.414.,...: •_ Photo D _ ,., Photo taken looking north rt �,1. �•t � 'i' • ' ' ,s k is •ST at the mowed lawn area, 1 '- �' ,.•--`'i' ` dt t.i located north of Wetland ` ?`" '``,'~ ,�'. ; A. - <. _ M M , ' S'�-— , . ` f• 5- .+r• _ .s.• ,- Propel 1125 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Ore on May 10, 2011. "" ..Pacific Habitat Services,lac- JUN 2 6 2013 i 0 ii.,ti` -=„I k .• g �� - • • f , - Photo ' A w )' .r Photo was taken looking i 1t •,: . �• i 1 °` 1 t r east at the forested portion• :fir a St;`., r,►:` r . '' • '; r. .. ,.. of Welland A. � ,. 4- • F 'T }` ; � - - � ii. 4 , y ,. . f • .e.-. r 7 +ter •� 774 . ' •� } � . +, `4,}.•'1. r.• -..► _ • ., '41,• 41,1. .,:; ','-.../-_., ' . ?i • . . , ., . . 4 . Photo F r r'1°, ` I , /F'.r • , Photo was taken looking .1 _,. ,, , ,' I!�l� �'. � �1 -� i ' .0- south al the forested ; �• 1 ` ` ` ,k ' t� 4 '"'• 7:portion of Wetland A. ;, �; :�::: l'',3. t, -•-r,11':III . ...AI — . .1,S'A:',. Yt tlp• tom` % fi•7 .i , r_4,46 -..!..•...........- -s- _,,,, . ., .-''. ' _ __...,"' . '',.- .141011a‘''' ' - l';'..- 4.. . 1 , . `� ..711100' / Project 602011#X72' Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken on May 10, 2011. Date Received (i" _ JUN 262013 {,� Pacific Ilabitat Services, Inc. Origin t 5.,.;;..N.°fit! . i ` ,. Photo >:. ,'ate -114 . .$ .- y r '�� ?�rl�, "�,f .`�. Photo was taken looking• # it ,` :ti ;. i t, • ''�a j. northeast at tax lot 500. i wil1x+!113k 1 ',- i y • 5 ' :4. ._►. 1, • { •1' . Photo H -: a :i r' �.,,',.� . � , � 4, Photo taken looking west - �' .- Photo g� '�, `�� `'.Ji ,. Qr. A t {' }• at Wetland A. !'. _ ► "ter t .S! •v a.-. ., .at .. '�: •;,, 74.. 4,,„ •:r„' ' if. ' •b:11 : 40,.,446 , I .i,!,' ' ,s:' * )•.` ,? 4.,..., • I 1 4"AfX, 't. 1 ...!.. ,• ...,.. .I. .... ,..., g:1111 , . .‘,414, Ail n - ' ;, .. �� ' ' , ' • "'� f+ S y '` '°' '"! ' • • - _ - : • .-F 04,- 'fir �• 7•�t ~+"� N _ - •�' • •• r5 rT.. Project#4725 612/2011 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken on May 10, 2011. Date Received: [I'�i JUN 2 6 2013 J -Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. OriC,inl! aSubri'llet • e Ap NIP en. ix I1� Wetland Definitions, Methodology 1 � , P - S iv »..r k y i.„ - I 3, 0 ,'f '�. Is � �" ;kF Z4 R, x K'i 1.4'd^ ),: ,Ys. I r . R 1)'f ty a p4 a�`I ;. , f'ak r s ( ecsi, ed: yy N� +q •Kev i 4 7 ° > j*t 9ui Original Submittal_._________._ • • WATERS OF THE STATE AND WETLAND DEFINITION AND CRITERIA Regulatory Jurisdiction Wetlands and water resources in Oregon are regulated by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) under the Removal-Fill Law (ORS 196.800-196.990)and by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The primary source documents for wetland delineations within Oregon is the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation.Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation ManuaG Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region, which are recognized by both DSL and COE. Waters of the State and Wetland Definition Waters of the State are defined as"natural waterways including all tidal and nontidal bays, intermittent streams, constantly flowing streams, lakes, wetlands and other bodies of water in this state, navigable and nonnavigable...". "Natural waterways" is further defined as waterways created naturally by geological and hydrological processes, waterways that would be natural but for human-caused disturbances (e.g. channelized or culverted streams, impounded waters, partially drained wetlands or ponds created in wetlands)..."(DSL, 2001). Wetlands are defined as"those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (DSL, 2001). Wetland Criteria Based on the above definition; three major factors characterize a wetland: hydrology, substrate, and biota. Wetland Hydrology Wetland hydrology is related to duration of saturation, frequency of saturation, and critical depth of saturation. The 1987 manual defines wetland hydrology as inundation or saturation within a major portion of the root zone(usually above 12 inches), typically for at least 12.5%of the growing season.The wetland hydrology criterion can be met, however, if saturation within the major portion of the root zone is present for only 5%of the growing season, depending on other evidence. The growing season is defined as the portion of the year when soil temperatures at 12.0 inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero (41 degrees Fahrenheit, 5 degrees Celsius), but also allows approximation from frost free days, based on an temperature. The growing season for any given.site or location is determined from US Natural Resources Conservation Service,:(formerly Soil Conservation Service)data and information. Date Received: Appendix D—Wetland Definition.and Methodology 111\1 26 2U13 Pacific Dabitat JUN Services,Inc. Page Oriry!1e91 • • Wetland hydrologic indicators include the following: visual observation of inundation or saturation, watermarks, drift lines, sediment deposits, and/or oxidized rhizospheres with living roots. Oxidized rhizospheres are defined as yellowish-red zones around the roots and rhizomes of some plants that grow in frequently saturated soils. Other indicators of hydrology, including algal mats or crust, iron deposits, surface soil cracks, sparsely vegetated concave surface, salt crust, aquatic invertebrates, hydrogen sulfide odor, reduced iron, iron reduction in tilled soils; and stunted or stressed plants can also be used to determine the presence of wetland hydrology. Wetland Substrate(Soils) Most wetlands are eharacterized by hydric soils. Hydric soils are those that are ponded, flooded, or saturated for long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions. Periodic saturation of soils causes alternation of reduced and oxidized conditions, which leads to the formation of redoximorphic features (gleying and mottling). Mineral hydric soils will be either gleyed or will have bright mottles and/or low matrix chroma. The redoximorphic feature known as gley is a result of greatly reduced soil conditions, which result in a characteristic grayish, bluish or greenish soil color.The term mottling is used to describe areas of contrasting color within a soil matrix. The soil matrix is the portion of the soil layer that has the predominant color. Soils that have brightly colored mottles and a low matrix chroma are indicative of a fluctuating water table. Hydric soil indicators include: organic content of greater than 50% by volume, and/or presence of redoximorphic features and dark soil matrix, as determined by the use of a Munsell Soil Color Chart. This chart establishes the chroma, value and hue of soils based on comparison with color chips. Mineral hydric soil must meet one of the 16 definitions for hydric soil indicators, or be classified as a"problem soil" in the Interim Regional Supplement. Wetland Biota (Vegetation) Wetland biota is defined as hydrophytic vegetation. A hydrophyte is a plant species that is capable of growing in substrates that arc periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of saturated soil conditions. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, have established five basic groups of vegetation based on their frequency of occurrence in wetlands. These categories, referred to as the "wetland indicator status", are as follows: obligate wetland plants (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC), facultative upland (FACU), and obligate upland (UPL). Table I gives a definition of the plant indicator codes. Table 1. Description of Wetland Plant Indicator Status Codes Indicator • Code Status OBL Obligate wetland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in wetlands(>99%). FACW Facultative wetland. Estimated to occur 67-99%of the time in wetlands. FAC Facultative. Occur equally in wetlands and non-wetlands(34-66%). FACU Facultative upland. Usually occur in non-wetlands(67-99%). UPL Obligate upland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in non-wetlands(>99%). If a species is not assigned to one of the four groups described above it is assumed to be obligate gland. NI Has not yet received a wetland indicator status, but is probably not obligate u9 tt"p neceived: Appendix D—Wetland Definition and Methodology JUN Z 6 2013 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. l'age 2 • • Observations of hydrology, soils, and vegetation, were made using the "Routine On-site" delineation method as defined in the 1987 manual and the Interim Regional Supplement for areas that were not currently in agricultural production. One-foot diameter soil pits were excavated to 20 inches and soil profiles were examined for hydric soil and wetland hydrology field indicators. In addition, a visual absolute-cover estimate of the dominant species of the plant community was performed using soil pit locations as a center of reference. Dominant plant species are based on estimates of absolute cover for herbaceous, and shrub species within a 5 foot radius of the - sample point, and basal area cover for tree and woody vine species within a 30 foot radius of the sample point. Plant species in each vegetative layer, which are estimated at less than 20%of the total cover, are not considered to be dominant. The wetland indicator status is then used to determine if there is an overall dominance (greater than 50%)of wetland or upland plant species. If less than 50%of the dominant species are hydrophytic,then the prevalence index may be used to determine if the subdominant species are hydrophytic: If the prevalence index is less than or equal to 3, hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met. During data collection, the soil profiles were examined for hydric soil and wetland hydrology field indicators. Plant species and cover were recorded. Data was recorded on standard data sheets which contain the information specified in the 1987 Corps Manual and the Interim Regional Supplement. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal Appendix I)-Wetland Definition and Methodology Pacific liabitnt Services,Inc. Page 3 -7+3,-7_ • Aoc... ., .. • • Attachment '11' ...- ..„ lilr, .:„ ,--4.; . .., • — .'".... '1-44-1.1'-'- i!._'--.'- • ' - 11111 •, -.,,,,„_. ... • ''`. \ .--1:',i5o. „._'.._:.= ,4, .,. '''Y . . • • iii. i- ! I. \.p,.;7,:lf 4.i:4)- ,... --1:...,--1 I/kl..,-.,:,„. iy....1,.*.i.... ..., /-.-N. ii I.! _ .-"' !.'.7-`.7:::. -44:-7,-.•-4: -..- ' 11) •: - --I I I 1.. i • -0 -:-...:,-.t.'.. i '. •_,:..,=, '-.30--' --..:--:*.1•---' +=, ilei . c i ,.!'•-..,- .•';!e;,. -.• -•--: ei ,,, -1 . , o . --- ... 311 i -• '1 • • • , • - .. •-.. . ..• cc) .=_..... != • al_._ -4.,-. c . 1,,. '' • ,,V , i - .• : • - '.:.: 'Po ./ I . l'.' . ' Ili 1-:: ., \, ` ..: , , , , '''' w '..' $1' . . ' •i 1 7- E ....1.--:k-- ' i i . ;-7.: i 8 A t -- III 1 --1 ..•• ..0 • . i . -• ti 1 .. 0, t, t, . 4. o . • ':-.1.--,, - : • ,. 1 / •'. '• ' 1st •—71 i . -,•,0, •,.,; l't PI 1 '1 . I. ) i • TI ., 4. . _._ ,_ _,.. I 15 / . ,.....,—.. v • • .-4...,„,„..Fon'A . ' . I 't - W - • Ei 4 1 z 1 h• ,...• t '" . ., •IA a AI ■ k 1 r - IN -. v......;., , • i .1 • ' . ,.. 1 . • 611 15 1 ..1r V ti ' to . i. • A • ,: .-• -i . , • cq :-..;.. 1. .. c ) . . - . • -,k7,•.7,,*v• 1- - -L.1: - 1 , ,--;.'. .•- .7;-,i'L----,.'', ''"'""'", ,'-'.I: _ 1 .•,. . `4%.!.."1,.1 1410,p L'-..',,,,,+,',.;‘:,.-...i--.--t.?-?_..1)-..?,.-..\..•1 ,..,.,''■t?•';",•'4.''.,.'.5.•4.::,"'.-'''7,‘1.',,—..i.,4..l 1 F..—, .-,-:.,,?‘•"'L,'I:'. F+777t-='--1.%.-.-7.+._.,.f.",:"-'.'.'--'..,.:-1-.11 4_;','-;',,•.,„1.::..,i..-..'.•,'.....4".r...-:.._.----•.‘1,_i.'..-'.,%r,,_k_:.:--",--i'.-_.iA--,-''-._'7.-).--S:1L:w 1-".',,..:..-...Z-....."-.4.-- - 1 ' . l-.-,,'.-.,;'-.-L.j,..'.:4.:.:.?-"'„-„.'-,-i1.--.'”:..'.'.i.,.a"f-_ce--it-:-.._iy"-:.;."-_r-..n 2.E:.€1.7r-4_.:-. •..... • 4 .i . .. ---+-, •.'."''..'....'-. .'D '•- • • T,iv • Ktrl...? .- 4:. - • • \ 'k-..-...-:,-4','-1;'•":-. .. '•':.. -`. •-.• • . - . F---. .'-'-'1.- .• irl.-2 , _ ' 1 ..*''..I. .4ff-th•_.-,'•5:,-._r-..,--•.A.1t, , • • .., - ; V.\ ,k:‘ . - 6 • - - ' c-,k-,•.: ' '7--•',4-f-A-tt!-- -- . -' • • ''-',.., - I WI - • ••---• . ' '.- .._ 6 .'' t; t. , I._ ' • . -''..'' • ..-. .. \ V-.'•.••. •,.,.i-•. .. .•.'• ...‘•,-.., .. -14*,• .''-',:t..,, -..?.0'A.."-A-,t-S.• *. .t'‘-,.'..', . ,• J...."I../;. I . i ...■ 4 . 'T7i.1 11„,,,f:i' '',•' -•. ••' • I 1 1' 1 •' '.......? -- ) 1, • ' . . .. [ ',, •-+„.,..,11,1.,';'....'; / ,:i • i'..,f-'.■''' .1 . , . . .., , i • ' 6' ''. . ,„11., 1,,,:1---., -!' i . . - ' 1 • 1 . .,......_ 1 • , • tra a - ,1,404 ‘v. • •• , -.` •• .., , . . ti.,. ' . - ...".'-.. • ' ' ':.,‘. .‘i:/,..--' .., , . . ..., .. r..1 ; • u 4 .• -. ' -' • --.-. 4: ' 0% . 4'.tater,'-• . . • • 1). - .”. ;•• I, .P. .. l'.';-...,..-. *•r4.-. --. 4,,,'1 ..i...;'.2 ' ?I. 1 A. ., •' . 'rli, *.:;-. 4 44.,,I. ::1-:,;.„4", ...,.,'.'',./..!:.,.:,,,::::,i . , •i. ■1 1 • •-r. • ' Cr". • ), , *---••• s. ..- , - ''-;.t.t.,01.. -.* -' .'' • .. . ' .. . -..k 71:7't--"...... .:.- '' .-.4.:. s , •- 1,- -;-.1-\-',..._=-' "±I•- .i l' ,•- . •.. _,.• - ..,.. , •fot-• 4..• si..., ....;., • ' `'\ - •-t4 • ' - •••'t .-.4..,•-. •4.,e,., .. . , .... .,.... .,-.. . • . .; ,.., ;-., -:: :• . • lt •-•;t:r.t1C. , : .7.'.1,-;• --. .*.i,'; \ •-,', i'AT,`4, :,...; ;_„ . :!.'4.- , 'Z --, •-, '-,-..J • ..„j •0. ',?, ••••,;2_,., , ,,:,, , ....) c,§ . ,t;,.....:'.. ,,,-,...7„...1_,:• ,'„:--- 1,ta,),..--". .... , • „,- • ,.. .• }.... ,..... •i.:.'::14.-..:,,!.. ,,. • V•' ..,-.. X• - ' ''.• ..•: . 04 ' • '• •• .,-:. . •-'11, 1'.0.:;7;•;;;'':• •.;•:,4:•,—.....,_.. '' . . . -..'-:"=-7 ••..:- 7, . . . ' ----Pc 4 t,.. :11..,.._-,:',.'.'.'-:-- .".' -'ir -..-._,-.:.., -_:_7.7.--IvA131160E1 , , ..._.. I I o • a 0 Attachment 12' z o - o a _ " 0 ry IL ILL J = r. m D @) 0 ca = p- e "51� D ', /�� '' F N S H 0 Z H o. CC lj/ ' Ox0.i 0 vi m O V1 U Z J O� > G 0 Lu r-4 . g p Z Z T N O f751.-. t7 Z v1 Z Tv) c o ° k 0 RI t/1 L 0 z X X N _ q z0 0 z W ¢ r Q+ LL. E Jew Z 0 _ - .0 v 1� i p - z F z a U r. .- Q1 > W Z o 1_^ 0 a; "I CO o k u ° w ux, a 4 0 Q 0 a W O 1 k V u h C b I Illit . ` ` ! t il 1 , 1 II II Q Q f 7 = - ,g t C 1 '\ li I!! §! i I eci 1 N I 9 fi Ii eE 1 -Inc A, .. •Y hi . 1.1. , <v �1' .'Ir $ 0 co y , ,, , !r 11' ,1- --• i _0 1 : iii II -'d cc 3\ 1,,, ii, •41 -.4 "1" w4 ui ., t II IC W I I . u '� ! I (( i. 4 • 4 '� i.l y N M 0 '1r•7 1 r� r imp up �■ a. ,— N a J i v O v !Sal .E 1:1 _ , N nn r r t 1 A L F A a R 5 , ; ci � 9' C E- It 11 II 3 : ' v a 0 Z 7 .1, 1 lilt 1/ --' 1`.' II .-1".0 _ _ v „,le ', \ e O O 4. • V • s D . • • •1 1 ii i k Iti fi _LI • I i e g 1 F-' 1c ! 1Y I 1 - - N .0 E 61 M oO N Al -• - - 8 c.... .a., 111 II 111 1.11 II 1 INK CD „i- Z -0 i WIN% 02 • °U U :1141■11wildita MI • 1!) : PA 1 h II/II i C kl ...L. iiiii NMI �ii�l iIL� u.9UfZ � :silt . iiiii iiiii r iiiii IiI ' 111111111111 ..... e 7:0 ,,, l - I ~_ W = . '''.: 9 Y_ 1.■ I ii� ~ -■ ■!•�8 ifr� • .- al v V n a 1▪ t Y ,-"1:7 rnfT ,,_i n w : Q • '2 F. nt ii • 1 t U - ' C; iiiii MU iiiii` ! cn I I 1 I I I I „9L Z-,Z .9,1 �� • l j b.^ ix O W us • .91/1. ll-.9 E CC Is I o r- u lit W. in 1 L L is c E jj 4 ei _al n 1 o 'w 3 ca c W C I/' Z >N CC O ° O aLI 0 cc• ii w O 4i Z W ; 3 0 W "' C D in Q z Z W 3 " ii O • • I V S 6 q N § o Q "0 d ,A • o •c A 5N m g 8 z c 1�:�i IX CV E z Za t Ilk F.... a To r c E 1O $ La '^Er t ha iii W E. Fin 44 Y Filloa til r y J Q� I 1R m ill J 1 @ 1.) . -, j if kr -. • r o w 1 Q B K 0 J C 11 Z tn CI 0 < C ._'• cs Cr v 0 Z 1 r.g W OC l7 9. / G. W r. Y „0,OZ v w et E .n a L Tr o — N v O E M a n - Q Y. ct c W r ai Q 0 cc 1' p w fii O Z Q W w z 0 "' Z Q V 2J U C C e 2 Y 7 C J a E . . • ii Ld 0, s3 m ry -t m t H N 1�A1 N /I = i Iii% 4 m �O e •� . it t... c 44 .. O 4 C V Et 1 44 4 ' 'V . 8 In 1 id= @ LI:lj 1.. W IlL Zu m � Sm W < ,4 s F ': Q O• oC z . 7j ,,,,w,P4 D o IL 09-X C o rn O u w N L• O E (i R tO Y a IQ; a G • 3 cc v Q 0 '4 O Z id } W O III W Z o Z a V `u c E 4 a U © 4 • Attachment '13' • (I Earth j En ineers. 312 SE Stonemill Drive, Suite 115 • Vancouver • WA 98684 /4:41\a;4N Yr 1\a`s Inc Phone: 360-567-1806 • Fax: 360-253-8624 Q] www.earth-engineers.com April 2, 2013 E. A.White Construction Co. LLC Phone: 503-970-1843 PO Box 1389 E-mail: petew(o)eawhiteconstruction.com 218 Center Avenue Molalla, Oregon 97038 Attention: Pete White Subject: Geotechnical Investigation Report Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel 3005 Franklin Boulevard,Tax-Lots 100 and 700 Springfield,Oregon EEI Project No. 13-029-1 Dear Mr.White: Earth Engineers, Inc. (EEI) is pleased to transmit our Geotechnical Investigation Report for the above referenced project. This report includes the results of our field investigation,an evaluation of geotechnical factors that may influence the proposed development,as well as recommendations for foundation design and general site development. We appreciate the opportunity to perform this geotechnical study and look forward to continued participation during the design and construction phases of this project. If you have any questions pertaining to this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact our office. Sincerely, Earth Engineers, Inc. A �-C _. Ra.t9 Charles R. Lane PE., GE. Raymond V. Aliperti Principal Geotechnical Engineer Geologic Associate Date Received: Distribution: Addressee(1 electronic copy) JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal ■ • Earth GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONREPORT '' 5.14 Engineers, nc. for the Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel 3005 Franklin Boulevard, Tax-Lots 100 and 700 Springfield, Oregon ICl Raymond V. Aliperti Prepared for Geologic Associate E. A. White Construction Co. LLC PO Box 1389 218 Center Avenue Molaila, Oregon Prepared by �(�Q��' PROF 4' ,oINgF'P Earth Engineers, Inc. Q d , 312 Southeast Stonemill Drive, Suite 115 Vancouver, Washington 98684 G �' -� • Telephone(360) 567-1806 �`OR°_CON e Fax(360) 253-8624 y ` j4 Ny 41k ES R. \P i2 -3i/+ EEl Report No. 13-029-1 Charles R. Lane PE.,GE April 2, 2013 Principal Geotechnical Engineer Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal 41 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1 1.1 Project Authorization 1 1.2 Project Description 1 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Services 2 2.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 2.1 Site Location and Description 3 2.2 Mapped Geology and Soils 6 2.3 Subsurface Materials 7 2.4 Groundwater 10 2.5 Seismicity 10 2.6 Liquefaction 11 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 3.1 Site Preparation 12 3.2 Structural Fill 13 3.3 Foundation Recommendations 14 13.1 Drilled Pier Alternative 14 3.3.2 Rammed Aggregate Pier(Geo-Pier or Rock Column)Alternative 14 3.3.3 Pile Foundations 15 3.4 Floor Slab Support 15 3.5 Pavement Recommendations 15 4S CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS... 17 4.1 Moisture Sensitive Soils/Weather Related Concerns 17 4.2 Drainage and Groundwater Considerations 17 4.3 Excavations 17 5.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS 19 APPENDICES: APPENDIX A-SITE LOCATION PLAN APPENDIX B-BORING LOCATION PLAN APPENDIX C—BORING LOGS APPENDIX D—SOIL CLASSIFICATION LEGEND Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal • • Page l of 19 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 Project Authorization Earth Engineers, Inc. (EEI) has completed a geotechnical investigation report for the proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel to be constructed on Lot 700 at 3005 Franklin Boulevard(with possible future parking on Lot 100)in Springfield,Oregon. Our services were authorized by Mr.Pete White on March 4, 2013 by signing EEI Proposal No. 13-P043 issued on that same date. 1.2 proiect Description Our current understanding of the proposed project is based on information provided by Mr.White in several emails as well as several phone conversations. Based on that information we understand the proposed project will consist of removing the existing 2-story residential structure along with its partial basement and two small outbuildings and constructing a 5-story wood framed hotel located on Tax Lot 700. Associated parking and driveway pavement areas will also be constructed on Tax Lot 700 South of the proposed hotel as well as on Tax Lot 100 located immediately West of Tax Lot 700. Included in the emails were the following items: • Project drawing entitled 'Overall Site Plan—Candlewood Suites, 83-Unit Hotel', Sheet Al-1, dated February 21, 2013, prepared by Wedgewood Architectural Services of Vancouver, Washington. This drawing shows the hotel will be constructed on the north side of the subject property on Lot 700,adjacent to Franklin Boulevard,with parking stalls constructed to the south and southwest of the building. • Geotechnical report entitled"Geotechnical Site Investigation, Patel Project,Tax lot 700;Tax map 17-03-34-33,Tax Lot 100;Tax map 17-03-34-44, 3005 Franklin Boulevard, Springfield, - Oregon'dated February 27,2013 and prepared by KM Engineering of Eugene,Oregon. This report indicates that undocumented fill soils are present on Tax Lot 100, but not within the footprint of the proposed structure on Tax Lot 700. The only geologic hazard noted was potentially liquefiable soils. Finally,the report recommended supporting the building in one of three different ways: 1) Shallow foundations bearing on structural fill that extends down to the bedrock stratum. This would require excavation below the water table. 2) Shallow foundations supported on rammed aggregate piers(i.e. Geopiers or rock columns). 3) Supporting the building with a deep foundations system(micro-piles or driven piles). Finally,the report indicates that additional borings or other types of investigations would be required prior to the issuance of final design criteria. Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel JUN 6 20 Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.13-029-1 Apra 2,2013 Original Submittal • • Page 2 of 19 Mr.White also informed us on March 20, 2013 that the site will be raised to an elevation close to that of Franklin Boulevard which is at approximate elevation of 440 feet above mean sea level (MSL). For the purposes of this report,we have assumed typical maximum wall,column and floor loads of 6 kips per linear foot, 120 kips, and 150 pounds per square foot, respectively. Other than the installation of utilities,no below ground construction is planned to our knowledge. For the purposes of this report,we have assumed that maximum cuts and fills may be as much as 6 to 3 feet. Finally, we have assumed that the proposed facility will be constructed In accordance with the provisions of the 2010 Oregon Structural Specialty Code(2010 OSSC)which is an amendment to the 2009 International Building Code(2009 IBC). 1.3 purpose and Scope of Services The purpose of our services was to perform a geotechnical engineering evaluation for the proposed hotel. Our site investigation consisted of six Standard Penetration Test(SPT)borings(B-1,B-2,B- 3, 9-4, B-6,and B-7)to depths of up to 15 feet below existing site grades using a truck mounted Dietrich D90 drill rig with an automatic SPT hammer subcontracted from Subsurface Technologies of Tualatin, Oregon. This report briefly outlines the testing procedures,presents available project information,describes the site and subsurface conditions, and presents recommendations regarding the following: • A discussion of subsurface conditions encountered including pertinent soil and rock properties and groundwater conditions. • Geotechnical related recommendations for shallow and deep foundation design, including embedment depth and axial compressive load capacity. • Floor slab recommendations. • Recommendations for the overall suitability of the in-situ soils for use as utility backfill and structural fill. • Discussions on geotechnical issues that may impact the project • Recommendations for parking lot pavement sections including asphaltic concrete and crushed rock thicknesses for Tax Lot 700 only. Access to Tax Lot 100 was not available to us at this time because it was being used as a construction staging area for the 1-5 Willamette River Bridge project. Our scope of services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, bedrock, surface water, groundwater, or air on or below, or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the exploration logs regarding odors,colors,and unusual or suspicious Items or conditions are strictly for informational purposes. An environmental assessment is typically advisable. Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,inc. EEI Report No.13429-1 JUN 2 6 2013 April 2,2913 Original Submittal . . �N�m ��N� ���� ��� Page 3 of 19 2.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2.1 Site Location and Description The location for the proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel is on the north portion of Lot 700 (see Figure 1 below). The lot is bordered to the north by Franklin Boulevard, the east by Tax Lot 500 (undeveloped), the west by Tax Lot 100 (currently a staging area for the Willamette River Bridge construction project), and the south by Ecosort, a large commercial recycling facility. There is also a wetland area present on the south side of the property that presumably extends onto the Ecosort property as well. 4. iTtittif.it.r.„..„:244.?,104.:13.:: . ,...„... %. _....„...i......n...:fropi.,:.:11,4 . ii4pa:::•-:t;,:i 444"e-LEL ,1/41 fir0,zr 41 caikttittr:740.2 tilt.eln'''';'.-711keirtetfalftpc....'...'sk V'''';S t : it't4C13.*-.1'',;(1 i i fit:±-nik".: __ 2.„ � ^~ Figure 1: Aerial Photograph of the site with the a imate location of the new Candlewood Suite Hotel in blue and outline of Tax Lots 100 and 700 in yellow The roughly rectangular shaped 1.3 acre lot(tax lot 700) has about 165 feet(laterally) of frontage along Franklin Boulevard with the property extending about 340 feet back from the road. Overa\|, the site slopes gently to the south and is covered with grass, blackberry bushes, and many Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,Inc. SE!Report No.13-029-1 v k JUN April 2013 �|A� � � ��i� ' Page 4 of 19 deciduous trees. Existing structures include a two-story wood framed house along the north side of the property as well as two smaller single story wood-framed buildings along the west side of the property. ] l i- ' it W tlPt 91tF�A'tt'! K` i - 'Ir.' iiit:IN ,..c. > --• &-_,., .*: i 1 l n I : E' ' p . 41 ... . Y,.1•` . . R fir a, ! i + r I? 1 - t : '^.f. • 4't''+1r'..,K n n..-r. 4 . s- t.. om- p f ,y az R ti �;- M f k i` 1 at l rS1„$ •' T ' a"^ . a r' ta�u W ' �y - Z r G�' `e}Y . ? s k -mf" iW '.6T.C ' h ! Fe. , a 'yeG ! % y` a K^}/ 2 } •sS3 '"�ti1�$ ,t' � 4 - � [{ S'1 L -.{-'G-< _ �' d .,T�yr r,,ry,* ;r- o4.It3 41.t f�' } I 1 to ..4. _°. 9 Y Y' ax+' rT .3r , :'/`V.t ^3 '.l ku ,,)J1, 1 ¢i >td.rs .} 4/.-tf4,,,yry ' x :::44)2.,16 _,, y.' .T x :a r R r,PA�a L p'r 5 r 211++1 .wy Lt„t"4'.'°. 3'3 �L rt.. `1v r"[`'tiros�1 441 y 7 h r 4a i. K d .t:K 1 tL sm> 11r, 7,"G�'�'1 1;d1" #c. 4h`. . :..'4. .1!C...:.. %;:-141.._ .i.4.:5 it'. r ' - ; z ...rc:a:Y' -:k4...,1' Photo 1: Looking south from the south side of the existing house. 1yr { y t `� '1aY .,. sy t 1j `�`#��iGf}f'�I��•Jt`(�1 t . ."r+; ,.y�, y- y• E;i74 teRr ,":?. . a'.. .. -kb d•'1 5. . .. . - ,r > s�cyry,''`t fi�ra tY D 4dt„� 4t 1iw GLy`E��c�Ri ��ai-t'�'",_ 'f'¢'" '�F. ,4' n .. ,. % e n r ,roar t .lam U _ ..ny ',- P 1': 1% ;u I _ �t •�'/� )a T y. \iIY, bO{ — � et 4C r w ' ,,avp yn1 .i f shkC t 18x 0 �r h��11t o I f= ,, ,r .. . -. - Date Received:J , e 2,,r ;..,.-its .._-�. , .. :.0�',/e i 1" `l\ L„:„4.. e Photo 2: Looking north from near the center of Tax Lot 700: Franklin JUN 2 6 2013 Boulevard is behind the home in the photo. Original Submittal_______ Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.13-029-1 April 2,2013 • • • • Page 5 of 19 .1„...4 civil;v11" ,4::.::::\.- . 4.1114.: -... ',' It: 1-c' ••• / 1{4,4 . .,r . -a (..,,... , I. - ..........1 . till-L. •4 ?...-:- . •‘4,A • .. a,',if.Prt(:.....‘• *. ... '1.1- -‘,„ .0-c- ■• ,... . •.. ... — • , . i , : T'1,`ii 1:0116 a''''"2-:'4 - '"'.? •ItCP:-r2'IT L. ':. 4. `i• 1...V14 •' 1.t..Cin1S,, rq:k•ta..•..' a....11S * • -*..•,...1:. ..a.':- , af,111i:arrtilh".•ViYnea ,..:1" • :;‘" L.;:t'-^..-: :.- • '...",;ra ',"'::."..2'• ''''-*--* :P•••4,4,":— '..,..•“...4::;•',V•4•1•-:(":11-1.:i3r.:-/La.4.1.,.; '14.1.1".-•,',...-•-•C`'' : --,:fteit'a. tr.-1..: ,t :'1,••-asier'm I: .' -. -i-'1,-7F,'--4:4.:-.4-:•*:ilt.■E 101/4;ti.7C-'■11--ccl---1=--:','-'tc-14*-7--;--:-;--t----."--1 • • --..: r,' t f,„,---n-k--41-- --;;---4:-:stv7....„,:..3„Er.-"fit4"-,Z,=.':.- --r".-",.4:- - '-- - .---..-i--1•-: -----:''----:--------t-'-,..-`----..,;4:7-:-,-;t144--;,-.-Mt-cz:r.,Ittc-"-i4ster-"s,---2.-./7.- •••.' "..17--4•41"7".'?),7:'--4-4r-,4: -...4..:;S:=:-."- :7,:;•..): Ii-fliji, ; 2.: 1-7.......4.;;;L:7,-• 4,. . ..-4.1,...,:::...,..k, 7.2"--A,--'-' 4 ;tK ..r4.::-.....:.:.:5;3-:.s..1.-e,.s iTir- 4:::Ird.aF, -..lic...,-..-.:-... :..t.t.v..:-..', 5..--..,--7..:-z.b,...m.i.:, .,:.a..,-,..,,,...-..,,.. ....4.-&-,. ,,,-,,t1.,tt,tor. ,- r...;1-.....;.-.0,.,9,Thre,-,:,;CJ fiktX;i::.t,1:.. ': '.. ...f:',..s.-,":„;;;-:•."., „ „ ':: •..„--,t'l '.1. -..11::-.--,' -;-"ri•r-', ; -. : ir. -; . t; t; ?,,,, 1. E--:";:vt•rt1:41:‘:.::.-c-i .....J.,....-‘4,1:-t.. ;:-;p:2,-.-----2.-,- .'; :.„ .. -.v.: 2 3--" 1 ::::;,:11....(7,7:t......:b..f.cji Photo 3: Looking East towards adjacent lot that is approximately 8+ feet higher in elevation-this is presumably due to fill placement. I;Fr; ',CT? -I*, 171:--- . '0".-11 • :...- f:. • •+ - • 'r' 'I' /.." . '215.... ... it.I,t.:it,i-4:-.:. .-:- ...:,.•..- [ ,-, ---., ,-; g., 1 92-,--,,, „,-...:c.._ 4 ,-- .. • y.1,., 4':,‘ - . ' r% ' ' 1 .....‘i..•#1"4.2-.t2 t • 1rsl.4r,...r -.---... -:'it- :4-4.„./.;-;-•;? ‘, "MI .i, i,',r. 1-'17 i LINcr:,c;"--,;-.4.v.T.;:.:Al-: .,..3-041. •4, t, ; .40.: - !;,. ...,...,.:;,- P64 • t.; .. rty.t, , ,;-..p.,„:•,:e.,.tr.. 4•23 ,. ,..„! %,...r; Z-11,7,-sk 7i;,,- V "‘ L riatgr V.:/' h--.I.cigl,t, /3...Nit 1'M.J., >[ fe..q -,.e.'.4..V,,,- 11ji ,4`.."; Oil re: 311:111./V4gf.r.1% I •'IlitrAirtaili :1tiVite41;41■,i,i4.111141! g;',::":":trir,14,er,g14;11' Att:=trtIV.11/1?"411'1.fl: ;-- ' 'i I '": b: *;•tf.40:4: rflorril 4 ,1 !::il. .. ,:,te:, :;,., :: 445,11.. ::...r:.,gr.p. :. .. :.,_pi ?-.a--:1 -1-,-,, U -,-...i:,...— li - a? i-te.- 004 •-,-...,-, . ..--•.- - .: . .. -•,: -,_.thribis,4-4m,„-tvi,e5„,,,,,Nittszv.,41-7 iiItt■ Vikt.-4-%." %.,C7954rif? r‘ t Ott 4‘41V- -1.eirtt:VA04°M4q..%*...0 t.■:.11,:..".14:4,tir:f:Z 'er.441,154-."4,:atZtnti --t*I ,..-....Alvics-41,1;:nr.•: ',$4,F.: --r:a•-r<wii•gf-wil-tzvr-s--4.&f:w4V-R4*.'"?/*1-4,;Tfk....-„4.-.:-.4„--:it-'2.1p5W-'1,.-OSVF;-Z:,-, 42,,...,w,t,,,-, .4.14R: 42.-A..i.-0.$4-;:tpt-ri*.". :„ t.iyf,"e.;",--.'-‘4„-kit ...,--g.g....:4itti-::,.:,2,pr,„*„54 ::::21::%. 77,4:1141:!.);.;r1/44A:?; 4;pse- ‘-4, -re.-17,- -4 td•-&::$4.,:s. -st-:' ?-„t-k-72:f.t.:-..ciaez:v.Ifii-3.zW4e41•4,-- YWArt.:ecit'llTirt„•41%.-r.:•)Ati„:47-gli -7:-......., ,-.17..-1..-:.-,..---A.:44....,-cra)41 -.7.00.-,--4;:aa'zi,...-7c:rig! -.... ...,...L.L.,:-.-- /:-:.--.2.q;--te NRstectv-.4..,-•:: :3-,.,:t'',f415,Pf-ni._91 FrEttilenoLvf:t-y:t7fiet;a-eiicsertis;FA-iz:egi1/2”411;:i,3_.:d4:1 ;aleAli,tr......,..sfettikveJ.:000.4.-):Tis reesipichit:iii*:44.74:4:., Frve.34arffin,,,,..4iv.„,-e-„,),.:..:„.4;:„:..;,t,..tae:,4.ti.:‘,., 4-,...S„,,t ,1,..-**M-V :n*V;:'17-tgr--‘,..?. ,C-4;:irii;41 rptri-Nhazttf,:it4. 347,-,-...:?...t-;..i:tx;.,::.....ti-cectbz,....5;4a.zo.f•rfett1,1,-.. ,1„,51*;:.: ---.*-1ZtiL.,:i.--ir_ciikivii.,2.1.--cia.exst.".i:ai7fre-3-ieic-i.nif:.4.,-41.:11 Photo 4: Looking Southwest towards adjacent lot that is also approximately 8+ feet higher in elevation due to fill placement. Date Received.. JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal Proposed Candlowood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.13-029-1 April 2,2013 • • Page 6 of 19 We also observed saturated ground conditions along the south side of Tax Lot 700 and within the 50 foot wetland setback zone. It appears the saturated ground conditions are due to surface water (i.e. rain, run-off, etc.). As discussed above,Tax Lot 100 immediately west of Tax Lot 700 could also be part of the Hotel development in the future. The rectangular shaped 0.70 acre lot is planned to include additional parking lot and driveway pavement areas. Also as discussed above, most of Tax Lot 100 is being occupied as a construction staging area for vehicles, equipment, and office trailers for the I-S Willamette Bridge construction project Access was therefore not available at the time our subsurface explorations were conducted. The lot is relatively level and mostly covered with imported crushed rock. Based on our observations while on site,it appears that Tax Lot 100(and Tax Lot 500 to the East)have been raised as much as 8+feet with fill material. 2.2 ;Nerved Geology and Soils The subject site Iles within the southern portion of the Willamette Valley Geomorphic Province,east of the Coast Range and west of the Cascade Mountains Geomorphic Provinces. The Willamette Valley Province is regional low land that extends from just south of Eugene,Oregon to Vancouver, British Columbia. Within Oregon. this narrow alluvial plain is approximately 130 miles long and ranges from approximately 20 to 40 miles wide(Orr and Onr,1998). The province is drained by the Willamette River,the longest north-flowing river in North America. Compressional forces attendant with uplift of the Cascade and Coast Range Mountain Ranges during the Miocene and Pliocene epochs depressed the Willamette Valley. The bedrock lithology of the Wllamette Valley in the vicinity of the subject site consists of the late Eocene aged (approximately 35 million years ago) Eugene Formation, a generally well consolidated to Whiffed, tuffaceous near-shore marine sedimentary rock that was gently folded during the geosyndinal compressional period described above(Yeats and others, 1991). Prior to deformation, low energy streams and lakes present within the southern Willamette Valley during the Pliocene epoch covered the Eugene Formation with fluvial and lacustrine deposits of silts and clays to various depths. With the rapid uplift of the Cascade Mountains in the Pliocene epoch, steepened stream gradients resulted In increased erosion of the Cascades and rapid deposition of thick gravel layers that incised the soft fluvial and lacustine deposits overlying the Eugene Formation. Locally, fining upward sequences of rhythmite deposits from the Pleistocene aged Missoula Floods are preserved that record up to 30 advance and retreat cycles of Lake Allison (Waitt, 1985), which filled the Willamette Valley to a depth of approximately 350 feet with each flooding event(Allen and others, 1986). According to the Web Soil Survey's Soil Map-Lane County Area.Oregon the on-site soils consist of the Chehalis silty clay loam and the Newberg-Urban land complex. The Chehalis silty day loam is mapped in the south 3/4 of Tax Lot 700 and the Newberg-Urban land complex is mapped in the north 1/4. They are both typical of flood plains and are found on sites where the slopes are 0 to 3 Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,Inc. Em Report No.13029.1 JUN 2 6 2013 April 2,2013 Original Submittal • Page 7of19 percent and the depth to a restrictive soil layer is typically more than 80 inches below the surface. They are subject to occasional flooding and derived from alluvium. Typical depth to water table is more than 80 Inches. The following is a typical soil profile for the Chehalis silty day loam from the surface to 55 inches: Silty clay loam with a Silt loam present from 55 to 70 inches. A typical soil profile for the Newberg-Urban land complex is surface to 65 inches: Fine sandy loam. 2.3 Subsurface Materials The subsurface conditions under the proposed new Hotel and parking areas were explored with six borings(B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, B-6, and B-7). Please note that we initially intended boring B-5 to be located in the northeast corner of the property,however this area turned out to not be accessible to the drill rig due to large and small tress as well as overhead lines. The boring locations are shown In Appendix B. The borings were located in the field using wood stakes with white paint and measured from either the intersection of Tax Lot 100 and 700, or from the northeast property corner. The borings were drilled to depths of up to 14 feet and were drilled using a truck mounted Dietrich D90 drill rig with an automatic SPT hammer. Soil and rock samples were obtained at approximate 2.5 foot intervals starting from the surface. Each sample was marked and identified by date sampled,project name.EEI project number,boring number,and sample depth. The samples were transported to our laboratory for visual identification and laboratory testing and will be retained for up to 60 days. Select soil samples were tested in the laboratory to determine materials properties for our evaluation. Laboratory testing was accomplished generally In accordance with ASTM procedures. The testing performed included moisture content tests (ASTM D 2216) and fines content determinations(ASTM 0 1140) . The test results have been included on the boring logs in the Appendix C. Topsoil was encountered in all of the borings. The topsoil was generally about 3 to 4 inches thick. The soils encountered at the boring locations beneath the site surface(i.e.topsoil)may be divided into 4 general strata as described below: clayey SILT with trace sand:The upper native stratum consisted of clayey sift with trace sand was present just beneath the topsoil and extended to depths ranging from 2.5 In 13-3 and B-4 to 5 feet below existing site grades In the remaining explorations.The clayey silt with trace sand was red- brown in color, generally moist, and soft to medium stiff. The material also contained organics consisting mostly of roots from grass,trees,or blackberry bushes within the upper 12 to 18 inches. Based on laboratory tests,the moisture content of the clayey silt with trace sand ranged from 33 to 44 percent. fine sandy SILT: Underlying the clayey silt with trace sand was a fine sandy silt layer that extended to depths of 7.5 feet in B-1 and B-2,5 feet in B-3 and 8.4,and to the terminal depths of B- Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel JUN 2 6 2013 Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.13429-1 April 2,2013 Original Submittal • 1111 - Page 8 of 19 6 and B-7. The fine sandy silt was red-brown in color, generally wet, and soft. Moisture contents from our laboratory samples also ranged from 33 to 44 percent. silty fine SAND: Underlying the fine sandy silt discussed above was a silty fine sand layer that was present from a depth of 7.5 to 11 feet In B-1 and B-2,as well as from 5 to 8 feet in B-3 and 5 to 8.5 feet In B-4. The silty fine sand was red-brown in color, wet (saturated), and very loose. Moisture contents from our laboratory samples ranged from 29 to 34 percent. Well graded GRAVELS with silt and sand (locally known as "bar-run gravel"): was encountered below the silty fine sand and was present from 11 to 13 feet in B-1, 11 to 12.5 feet in B-2, 8 to 12.5 feet in B-3 and 8.5 to 12 feet in B-4. These native gravels were gray in color,wet, and ranged from medium dense to dense. The gravels were typically sub-rounded to rounded and occasional sand lenses were encountered. SILTSTONE(Eugene Formation Sedimentary Bedrock):Underlying the well graded Gravels with silt and sand (bar-run gravel) was a sedimentary bedrock unit known as Eugene Formation Siltstone. This stratum was consistently encountered between depths of 12 to 13 feet below current grade and extended to the terminal depths of B-1,B-2,B-3,and 8-4. The sedimentary bedrock unit was gray and extremely difficult to drill,sample,or even remove the material from the sample tube (see Photo 6 below). The relative consistency of the siltstone was hard based on N-values of over 50 and the difficulty of drilling and sampling of this material. This material extended from beneath the well graded gravels to the maximum depths explored of 14 feet below existing site grade. Based on a visual-manual evaluation,the soil samples obtained In the borings did not appear to be expansive. However laboratory testing to fully characterize expansive potential was not part of our scope of work. The above subsurface description is of a generalized nature to highlight the major subsurface stratification features and material characteristics. The boring logs included In Appendix C should be reviewed for specific information at specific locations. These records include detailed boring locations, sample locations, soil and rock descriptions, stratifications, N-Values, and results of laboratory tests. The stratifications shown on the logs represent the conditions only at the actual boring locations. Variations may occur and should be expected between locations. The stratifications represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials and the actual transition may be gradual. Water level information obtained during field operations is also shown on these logs. Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel JUN 2 6 [013 Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.134294 AprIl 2,2013 Original Submittal , . • • Page 9 of 19 . '• a,,,-..:., .2 .- -c--4 A dc. ;I , '.... ' ., . . ' . -1.• . itt , t . 4:‘,'::-..•:: f '1- 0"...?";.::ail , ,• Ii 1 y, ,P.A-51 \... :*A •2 ", a.... .. • 1 .4 1 0*-1/2!";13?a•rdC"C, -.•."3,2*-7 7. ..( I •„.. ta •.,7.-7 a.r.\.+++;a••••77 Y." .'''VP,'/if .:-.I.T I ptc.i,y4. . ....r.,..:7,— :.4.... Ate. t. • 7. " tp N./I . .• tile ott+'kr"glitelEt re•" •."7 ae., 1047 i 11-1 3-4/11- - .:7E1 s . 1 i..,‘t .t. ....kr ."......cr-L. _. ...,.. .At..:,....„.,-,?1-r-i.r.v-c.::- L-4.. ;;P-s•It dricti:11 :.-...sta•71---;' h i• Pz-_,-,;- •----4 -&99. . ,..- _-----1/4.---•=,cr, r, ...,....„.c.44-,.., _. ..As••••■ 1. ...+!.,.., ,• r... :a., , nl,..177C4W.P“.•,71.e."111 •+: :X .7.-1":•;.:1•.• •• t,ie ""• :"..."1 :ilatlitr -...&•:_aytki!4'"?'„1.....744"..,:eit r ..c'•'.•,••••"..; -lert::t-. -... 1 .',,,,...ytc..,:•:- ,.. .rt.i?....-.. .. . ''- : ct,(::-...% i .r.,- ' - Ir.'..4r14th;Lt.-Ai' vi----- - — . d).ti" --=— 53 ,':. -:: . • st,....*.,,f, rt,f3,. 1%, ...„......, ... , ..`«ltri.1 .1"."%47:t e .,:„..",....7,„„.,w.,4,!. .,6. c . :. , ,.- .t.......„„...r, :4• peo.c--- ‘^'• , ... -a 4, . . • li("i":""• 1/4?:;•• 4”privet.a.' ••••thmartn7,74thee .....,.., "ai, ...y7lii..1+0,..-.,.. ks ,-y 4 ••••." --- + -,•,7 tja:.......--aW•.',3,•-?7T747.:,flin.....• .t-r4 ta•tra.b• ri" .."il •• --,...•".•,,... -47 ir":7.41kt.C.1;41g#1`..4727 •••' .....11=1. 4•t*7•-• fer*Vrtirai..a pr St.."I'S 4\-t: f":".34+,1:rqi3arr. "--.443.:ta"at."-% "I 01?-X,IestiO4,4..11011Xtrailea -1.);.7<n.: •:41 i•••••••".1/MV-ne-4;4*-- -ta=e1r!‘cla1/4174.4.;1/44-411/4TES"StEire...1 . Ai. ."- 7;*•.5.:".$tttlfr714-CaPt..etti• tS,31N;a425.4 .7e'l -1-14-4,r -,Tr1/4'--A :. . ...O., ‘ ....r %.-7:.:13.- -4-p;e1ria.c.• .4...-.4dgit,a‘rfizia.. !fl: iir.sist„, , .. . L :...4.1:,....:-.LcsjStrialsoss.44,A13...,24.,,.....14.',...a .1,*.,A i.....: ...,......-sz-.6..e..acta. :-.4.,..g.....t.7...-Thr---.. ....-c.,....",. .---, ...--- - 17:,...t.,T. ir.....astrki.,......,-,..-ate4s1„..),:y1...k.,,• •::: :_-..•.1.---5...-.k,t4a..4-,,,c,.;;;;.:: ..,..-:r.z:41.4.,?..kor.ice.--14,2.4pgAlc.4.i.,.,.,4;...tsc4A-4.-- Photo 5: Drilling Boring B-1 near the northwest corner of proposed new hotel. . . - • • - 413.,,,0-4,, ecii,rx. 1,?..- " L..•...„,;:z.ii .. 2., , - ,..... , 0,..,..p.;,.aty - -.4,is ,..e. Se, . -' , 4- El...4.0 ..,,,, - I. - ... 1.7A7,2113A - cffr:.:-, ' -et' •1 r TiCS•"■.i ..<• i - 4- J-,4, k..4ts t--4,•s4-;.bv 0 S. 7-r,„,..,.,.?7,:g4.;,.)*A,44,-1.2-,..;•4-, ‘",._.-:......Fp-.4:."..,'•%-.-,::g:-,(,-z.,324..445A,144.,,47!,,-4,,,,,,,:f.54t,--c.(,.43.r.,0..:-1<,,1c V'c,,?,A,4.*p", i ,1,0.4 4:.*yin44*.2.4pn,1r1 b- i s4i ;,r144e, ,it , c4 . 4 4.-„,. , 4.,.,,, ,v147.444 44.‘, -.,;,.,it+ h -•ti, 4 t., --....'t tx , . , 41 flr,i.4444,' .- 0 14■.k.,4., a-:',0. .:.,...... .;;, .4:24. v . :445.1";r1 74;77.ar itc.eP. ft-4' k irnavgl,•5,;,.. •"-..y,,f,,..2--, •,-,,,fgoc,:Al•i -44dodielm.A. 1,--1- A •v 4tyt.• ,..tt,' • -.4---'-ir•:td I '•swieltet-.0.1 • it r 1/4 it 4.x.M.:As.,. 14V0. .0^ tp tIr. e.„;ctys.1KW: 4,1440: 4 , 0144.. ... . , qe.eilti..-'1,-A.:Folt•Pc,* C , ...;14,1 .4; ; V.ItA3,1":37,:-&It.d P':,,,.,...:1•11+?../..+1.111t,II"t,C" •. -",,t,, g OW raft nli ‘ a ttS;k. :•::.7",".4,:t..t.••• t.,'t"Zt.';IV/rt.4":4. fil" 46 It " ts, t.p.4-10.4• .f pr.,....a6,........',....‹.. . _- 0.'et..i.1'04;- !Z ? .i. ' ikk...V„,. 41.• '010%.,---- ,----mrs.rAtrp.,n .4aL itpt-it- ..".rie-.011 .illi'ithK3:41'211:4S.V.ILLU.1.1."..%6..i.a tilt' ‘' .1 .■ - Photo 6: Eugene Formation Siltstone from Boring B-2, sample from a depth of approximately 13 feet. This material was very difficult to remove from sampler. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Engineers,Inc. Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel Earth EE1 Report No. 13-029-1 April 2, 2013 Original Submi il ttal Page 10 of 19 2.4 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in our explorations approximately 8 feet below existing site grades. Based on our knowledge of the area and from our subsurface samples, it is likely that a perched groundwater layer is present just above the Eugene Formation Siltstone. This perched groundwater layer is probably present during the rainy and high river seasons of the year. Any deep excavations on-site should expect to encounter this water. 2.5 Seismicity In accordance with the procedure established in Section 1613.5.5.1 and Table 1613.5.2 of the 2010 OSSC, the site should be classified as Site Class F (i.e. soils vulnerable to potential failure or collapse under seismic loading)because it is potentially liquefiable(liquefaction is discussed further in Section 2.6 below). However, Section 20.3.1 of ASCE 7-05 states that structures having fundamental periods equal to or less than 0.5 seconds may be classified in accordance with Table 1613.5.2 and do not have to be considered Site Class F. A building's fundamental period can conservatively be estimated by multiplying the number of floors by 0.10 seconds. Given that the proposed building is planned for 5 stories,the building period will actually determine the site class unless liquefaction is mitigated. Since the period of 0.5 is conservative, we anticipate that its fundamental period will be less than 0.5 seconds and the Site Class does not have to be classified as F due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soils. We recommend a Site Class E(i.e.soft soil profile with N less than 15)since the site is considered potentially liquefiable as discussed later in Section 2.6. Inputting our recommended Site Class E as well as the site latitude and longitude into the United States Geological Survey(USGS)Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters, Version 5.1.0 computer software, we obtained the seismic design parameters shown in Table 1 below. TABLE 1: SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETER RECOMMENDATIONS Parameter Recommendations',- Seismic Site Class E S, 0.658g 0.320g F, 1.384 F, 2.721 Sacs(=S,x F,) 0.911g Sat,(=S, x Fs) 0.870g Sr*(=2/3 x S,x F.) 0.607g PGA(=Sos/2•S) 0.243g Site Latitude=44.04412, Site Longitude=-123.04827 Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel JUN 2 6 LU13 Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.13-029-1 April 2,2013 Original Submittal 41 Page 11of19 The return Interval for the ground motions reported in the table above is 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years. Again, if liquefaction is mitigated through ground improvement or a deep foundation system, this could alter our seismic site class recommendation. 2.6 Liquefaction Liquefaction involves the substantial loss of shear strength in saturated soil,usually taking place within a soil medium exhibiting a uniform fine-grained characteristic such as sands or silty sands,with a loose consistency, and low confining pressure when subjected to impact by seismic or dynamic loading. Saturated silty and clayey soils may also be liquefiable,depending upon their plasticity. Given that bedrock is very shallow at this site and a dense to very dense gravel stratum is situated atop of it,it is our professional opinion that only soils in the upper 8 to 11 feet of the site have the potential to liquefy. Additionally,given that we drilled the site in March(nearing the end of our wet season)the water table should have been close to its seasonal/yearly high (8 feet). Conservatively,we estimate that the water table could be as shallow as 6 feet below current grade in an exceptionally wet year. Therefore liquefaction could occur between 6 and 11 feet below grade at the maximum. If we assume a 2%strain on that material (which is also conservative)we can conclude up to about 1 %of total dynamic settlement Is possible at the site. It should be noted that if the site will be raised by 6 to 6 feet with structural fill prior to the construction of the hotel,we can conclude that this potential settlement will befairly uniform across the footprint of the proposed building. We estimate that the total differential dynamic settlement that could occur across the site once the fill has been placed to be on the order of Winch for a typical shallow foundation system. Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.13 0294 April 2,2013 Page 12 of 19 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our field work, laboratory evaluation, and engineering analyses, it is our opinion that the main geotechnical factors that will influence the proposed construction are the following: 1) Presence of Soft Compressible Soils. In order to bring the site up to the grade of the neighboring street,between 6 and 8 feet of structural fill will be placed. This,as well as the proposed building, will add a significant load to those compressible soils which will consolidate over time. While the depth of fill will most likely keep differential settlements fairly low,total settlement could be an Issue if this condition is not mitigated. 2) Presence of a Shallow Water Table. The water table was discovered at a depth of 8 feet at the time of our explorations. This would make any deep excavations at the site difficult without dewatering. 3) Presence of Potentially Liquefiable Soils. As already discussed above, potentially liquefiable soils are present at the site. Total potential settlements are on the order of 1 '% inches with the potential for differential settlement of approximately Winch. This also causes the site to be designated as a more restrictive site class(E)as discussed above. Given our knowledge of the project as well as the site restrictions as outlined above there are several different viable options that would make the site developable—all of our options assume that the site will be raised as discussed above. Some of the options considered were over- excavation of the compressible and liquefiable material,Geo-piers or rock columns,concrete piers, or a pile supported (driven pile) foundation system. We also considered surcharging the site; however our experience with surcharging sites In the Eugene/Springfield area indicates that site surcharges are somewhat risky and have not performed well in the past. It is our professional opinion that overexcavation of the soft, compressible(also liquefiable)soils would be difficult given the strength of the In-situ material(very soft or soft)as well as the shallow water table. The other options remain viable and are discussed below. It should be noted that if the site subsurface conditions are improved through the installation of Geo-piers or rock columns, that the bulding can be constructed on a standard shallow foundation system. 3.1 Site Preparation Topsoil,vegetation,roots,and any other deleterious soils will need to be stripped from development areas. The depth of topsoil in our soil borings was approximately 3 to 4 inches. It is not unusual for the depth of topsoil to vary from this range. A representative of the Geotechnical Engineer should determine the depth of topsoil removal at the time of construction. Date Received: Proposed e poort o.13- 29-Suites Hotel JUN 2 6 2013 A Engineers, 13 Original Subclittal___ • Page 13 of 19 Utilities will need to be located and rerouted as necessary and any abandoned pipes or utility conduits should be removed to inhibit the potential for subsurface erosion. Utility trench excavations should be backfilled with properly compacted structural fill which is constructed as outlined in Section 3.2 of this report. After the site has been stripped,the subgrade for both the building and pavement areas should be proof-rolled with a heavily loaded tandem axle dump truck or similar rubber tired vehicle. Soils that are observed to rut or deflect excessively under the moving load, or are otherwise judged to be unsuitable should be undercut and replaced with properly compacted fill. Fine-grained soils which have moisture contents more than about 2 percentage points above the optimum moisture are generally prone to softening when dynamic loads such as those generated by the wheels of construction equipment are Imposed upon them even if the soils exhibited substantial strength in an undisturbed state. After disturbance,these fine-grained soils typically rut and deflect significantly and do not provide adequate subgrade support for floor slabs,foundations,pavements, or fill placement. Therefore it is important that the proof-rolling and undercutting activities should be performed during a period of dry weather. In areas where fill is required,the structural fill should then be placed on the prepared subgrade that has passed a proof-roll. 3.2 Structural Fill Structural fill materials should be free of organics or other deleterious materials, have a maximum particle size generally less than 2 inches,be relatively well graded,and have a liquid limit less than 45 and plasticity index less than 25. In our professional opinion,the on-site soils free of organics would be appropriate for use as structural fill;however the on site soils are extremely wet and would take a great deal of time during a period of prolonged dry weather to process them for use as fill. We recommend the fill be moisture conditioned to within 3 percentage points below and 2 percentage points above optimum moisture and compacted to within 95 percent of materials maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557(modified Proctor). If water must be added,it should be uniformly applied and thoroughly mixed into the soil by disking or scarifying. Fill should be placed in a relatively uniform horizontal lift on the approved subgrade. Each loose lift should be no greater than about 1-foot The type of compaction equipment used will ultimately determine the maximum lift thickness. Each lift of compacted engineered fill should be tested by a representative of the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of subsequent lifts. The fill should extend horizontally outward beyond the exterior perimeter of buildings and pavement at least 5 and 3 feet, respectively, prior to sloping. Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel JUN 2 6 2013 Earth Engineers,Ines EE1 Report No.13-029-1 April 2,2013 Original Submittal • Page 14 of 19 Given that we are recommending foundation elements be installed through the fill that will bring the site up to grade. The fill material selected should not contain a large amount of rock that would increase the difficulty of penetrating the fill layer. 3.3 Foundation Recommendations 3.3.1 Drilled Pier Alternative Based on the anticipated column loads and depth to the well graded gravel with silt and sand (locally known as °bar-run°), concrete pier foundations are recommended as the foundation elements for the proposed building. The diameter of the pier is recommended to be 24 or 36 inches, and the piers should be extended at least 2 feet into the gravels or Siltstone located approximately 8 to 11 feet below existing grades—given the proposed fill depths,piers would have a total length of about 20 feet. Under these conditions, the piers may be designed for a net allowable end-bearing pressure of 10 kipslft or an allowable compressive capacity of 31 kips for the 24 inch diameter pier and 70 kips forte 36 inch diameter pier. The allowable bearing pressure includes a safety factor of 3 and is Intended for dead loads and sustained live loads and can be increased by one-third for the total of all loads, including short-term wind or seismic loads. Estimated maximum total and differential settlements due to axial compressive loads are anticipated to be on the order of less than 1 inch and 4 Inch, respectively. We have ignored skin friction of the pile when calculating load carrying capacity because of its very small contribution. Lateral load capacities can be provided once pier diameters are known. The selection of the appropriate pier diameter(s)will require input from the Structural Engineer. 3.3.2 Rammed Aggregate Pier(Geo-Pier or Rock Column)Alternative Rammed Aggregate Piers may be considered for founding of the proposed building. Rammed Aggregate Piers are densely compacted columns of well-graded gravel that transfer bearing loads in a manner similar to a concrete pier or caisson. Rammed Aggregate Piers can be designed to transfer loads to competent bearing materials underlying the soft soils or, by utilizing skin friction, rammed aggregate piers can be terminated before reaching competent bearing materials.They can typically be Installed both above and below groundwater. Casing methods may be necessary in soils that easily slough (.e. low shear strength soils or cohesionless soils). Using Rammed Aggregate Piers can be a cost-effective method of reducing the need for over-excavation, and eliminating more costly concrete deep foundations (i.e., piers or caissons). If selected, consideration should be given to Installing these piers prior to placement of any structural fill on site. They have been used successfully on similar projects with soft soil conditions in the Willamette Valley. Date Received: JUN 262013 Proposed Candlewood Suttee Hotel original Submittal Perth Engineers,Inc. EEI Report No.13-029-1 AprIl 2,2013 411 411 Page 15 of 19 Rammed Aggregate Piers are a proprietary design/build method provided solely by a specialty geotechnlcal contractor such as John Martin at 214 S.E.Walnut Street in Hillsboro,Oregon(phone 503-640-1340). Please contact us for more information if needed. 3.3.3 Pile Foundations Pile foundations are the likely the most expensive foundation option that we could recommend for this site. If a recommended pile size is desired, please supply us with the proposed design loads (both axial and lateral)that need to be resisted. 3.4 Floor Slab Support Given the presence of soils that are at risk of settling, we recommend that rigid floor slabs be designed to span between the piers or be supported by rammed aggregate piers rather than rely on the soil for support. We recommend that a minimum 6-inch thick, free-draining granular mat be provided be provided immediately beneath the slab. The 6-inch thick free draining mat should provide a.capillary break to limit migration of moisture through the slab. If additional protection against moisture vapor is desired,a vapor retarding membrane may also be incorporated into the design. Factors such as cost, special considerations for construction, and the floor coverings suggest that decisions on the use of vapor retarding membranes be made by the owner. Additionally,concrete slabs should have an adequate number of joints to reduce cracking resulting from any differential movement and shrinkage. 3.5 pavement Recommendations Our scope of services included evaluating the surface soils for the specific purpose of a detailed pavement analysis. The recommended thicknesses presented below are considered typical and minimum forthe derived parameters. After the site has been stripped and prepared in accordance with sections 3.1 and 32 of this report, and prior to placing the base or leveling course, the pavement subgrade should be proofrolled with a fully loaded dual axle dump truck. Areas found to be soft or yielding under the weight of the dump truck should be overexcavated as directed by the Geotechnical Engineer's representative and replaced with additional base course. The base course should consist of well graded crushed stone with a maximum particle size of 2 inches and no more than 5 percent passing the U.S.#200 sieve(0.075 mm). The base course should be moisture conditioned to within three percent of optimum and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent, as determined by the ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor). Using the AASHTO method of flexible pavement design,the following design parameters have been assumed: a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value of 5 for the clayey silt with trace sand soils that underlie much of the proposed new parking lot and driveway pavement areas,a pavement life of 20 years,a terminal serviceability(Pt)of 2,a regional factor(R)of 3.0,and an 18,000 pound equivalent axle load(EAt.)of 10 per day for car parking,and 10Qdtei ay for driveway areas. Additionally,the PEI No.13-0294 Suites Hotel rJCl u�h(2 6 2013 Earth Engineers,z 2913 Origin& Submittal • • Page 16 of 19 driveway must be designed to support an 80,000 pound fire truck. Making these assumptions it is possible to use a locally typical"standard"pavement section consisting of the following: Asphaltic Concrete Recommended Minimum Thicknesses(Inches) Driveway Areas/Fire Lane Pavement Materials Car Parking Access Road/School Bus Lanes Asphaltic Concrete Surface 3 4 '/: Crushed Aggregate Base Course underlain by Mirafi 500X geotextile 12 12 fabric or equivalent Concrete Recommended Minimum Thicknesses(Inches) Driveway Areas/Fire In Pavement Materials Car Parking Access RoadlSchool Bus Lanes Concrete Surface 5 8 Crushed Aggregate Base Course 8 8 An average weight of 4000 pounds per car,15,000 pounds per loaded bus,30,000 pounds per loaded delivery truck,and 80,000 pounds per fire truck was used in our calculations. Asphaltic concrete materials should be compacted to at least 91 percent of the material's theoretical maximum density as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 2041 (Rice Specific Gravity). Geotextile fabric should be placed over a smooth subgrade and should be placed with no wrinkles. The fabric should be overlapped a minimum of 18 inches. Construction equipment should not be permitted to travel on the geotextile fabric. For areas that will just receive crushed aggregate we recommend a minimum of 12 inches of crushed rock for all parking and driveway pavement areas. Water should not be allowed to pond behind curbs and saturate the base course. In down grade areas base course should extend through the slope to a0 water entering the base course a path to exit uate Received: Proposed Report o 1Su1�'Hotel JUN 2 6 2013 Earth Engineers, Ap 02, 013 April�2013 r', .Inal Subr,i, ttc i • Page 17 of 19 4.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS EEI should be retained to provide observation and testing of construction activities involved in the foundation,earthwork,and related activities of this project. EEI cannot accept any responsibility for any conditions that deviate from those described in this report, nor for the performance of the foundations if not engaged to also provide construction observation for this project. 4.1 Moisture Sensitive SoilsNVeather Related Concerns The upper soils encountered at this site are expected to be sensitive to disturbances caused by construction traffic and to changes in moisture content. During wet weather periods, increases in the moisture content of the soil can cause significant reduction in the soil strength and support capabilities. In addition,soils that become wet may be slow to dry and thus significantly retard the progress of grading and compaction activities. It will, therefore, be advantageous to perform earthwork and foundation construction activities during dry weather. 4.2 prainaae and Groundwater Considerations Water should not be allowed to collect in the foundation excavations or on prepared subgrades for the floor slab during construction. Positive site drainage should be maintained throughout construction activities. Undercut or excavated areas should be sloped toward one comer to facilitate removal of any collected rainwater,groundwater,or surface runoff. The site grading plan should be developed to provide rapid drainage of surface water away from the building areas and to Inhibit Infiltration of surface water around the perimeter of the building. The grades should be sloped away from the building and paved areas. Roof runoff should be piped (tightened)to either the on-site stomrwater disposal system,storm sewer or discharged upon a paved surface. 4.3 Excavations In Federal Register,Volume 54,No.209(October 1989),the United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Heath Administration(OSHA)amended its°Construction Standards for Excavations,29 CFR,part 1926,Subpart P". This document and subsequent updates were issued to better insure the safety of workmen entering trenches or excavations. It is mandated by this federal regulation that excavations, whether they be utility trenches, basement excavations or footing excavations, be constructed in accordance with the new OSHA guidelines. It is our Date Received: Proposed r Report Noo.1 029-.1S"rt.a Hotel JUN 2 6 2013 " App 9 2 Inc. Engineers, Original Submittal, Page 18 of 19 understanding that these regulations are being strictly enforced and if they are not closely followed, the owner and the contractor could be liable for substantial penalties. The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable,temporary excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. The contractor's"responsible person",as defined in 29 CFR Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. In no case should slope height,slope inclination,or excavation depth,including utility trench excavation depth,exceed those specified in local,state,and federal safety regulations. We are providing this information solely as a service to our client. EEI does not assume responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's compliance with local,state,and federal safety or other regulations. Date Received: JUN 262013 C'rigiral Suhrmittnl Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,Inc EEI Report No.134294 App Z 2013 • • Page 19 of 19 5.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are based on the available project information and the subsurface materials described In this report. If any of the noted Information is incorrect, please inform EEI in writing so that we may amend the recommendations presented in this report If appropriate and if desired by the client. EEI will not be responsible for the Implementation of its recommendations when it is not notified of changes in the project. Once construction plans are finalized and a grading plan has been prepared, EEI should be retained to review those plans,and modify our existing recommendations related to the proposed construction, if determined to be necessary. The Geotechnical Engineer warrants that the findings, recommendations, specifications, or professional advice contained herein have been made In accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practices in the local area. No other warranties are implied or expressed. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of E.A.White Company,LLC for the proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel to be located on Tax Lot 700 located at 3005 Franklin Boulevard In Springfield,Oregon. EEI does not authorize the use of the advice herein nor the reliance upon the report by third parties without prior written authorization by EEI. Date Received: Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel JUN 2 6 2013 Earth Engineers,Inc. ES Report No.11029-1 April 2,2013 Original Submittal • APPENDICES Proposed CanNewood Suites Hotel Earth Engineers,Inc. EEI Fort No.13-029-1 Date Received: MrH 2.20" JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • APPENDIX A: SITE LOCATION PLAN 41 °' .. }� f one' se t�cmn l t� _�t - J n nat Eiv' `-r, ;aum, _ 1C1i ,.. _, t t t r: P.u' t•'J zt JCt • aSYJN 4e - - Yr� 'r e t ::cpt .: N v:E:: .T, unr. PROJECT • . ....r `-u a.. _ -.. _. - 'nu SITE ., ac Vin Sr- " HS e `` "^ r uleuwootli o rc r r E- g S• v n t cea .5 =YnA' a t V4 tf. 7t,nLJ .r k r WO.�,• E t .. D.cnw •�l .3 mapquest , t:°i t 3 t!' 02at3M.ravrM r13NAV ° F-"a� q°'• Eartlr Candlewood Suites Hotel g EEI Report No. April 2,2013 Ain Engineers, 3005 Franklin Boulevard 13-029.1 p ' Inc Springfield,Oregon 97477 Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • APPENDIX B: BORING L:CATION PLAN i Tr!Fin I 1-7.-4:TaElitiiii==1 „so . - •••.et - ---- — I ;..., ..7...,„,. ...--, EXISTING PROPOSED 4 ;7T --- Al C.:.'., E_____....---- HOUSE ; r.; I .E 01.1.1:1110Itk- NEW HOTEL . .==•..-:= .-t :•-•i3"-.1. ilia _ _ .. ,,..:1,=-41. ,., - ! v=c,....; . ..=_.:...• • ..:.i. as (........... II -B4 ' ' •';'. ;WI : I . . .. := 6.L • _• .....- .. . • :. ,-.• i 134 • • .4 : , ii im - - it ti . . 54,1. 8-6 '. .. • 1.:-. ' ••••--.:frs..:1•:=.7.- :::-----z7 : " 1 ....... "• •' •, 1 -;::=7±-:." .—_- , — -- •• , • "LETO: ••••••• ^-, _—..—. - . .';0 .......... . . . ..... . .7( ?m"int."4 e-approximate boring locations IIII=apProximate location of boring 8-5 that was inaccessible to drill rig at the time of ow site investigation . AT-Li Earth EEl Report No.i? ". ,1 Engineers, April 2,2013 '1,••i4, a, - ' Inc .1m C3a0n05d1FeworanoklinSBuioteusteHvaordlel Springfield,Oregon 97477 13-029-1 Date Received: JUN 26 2013 Original Submittal • APPENDIX C: BORING B-1 CLIENT: E A.Waite Construction Company EARTH ENGINEERS.INC.PROJECT NO.: 13029.1 PROJECT: Candiewood Subs,Springfield,Oregon 97477 EQUIPMENT. Diedrich 13.60 with auto SPT hammier LOCATION: For proposed hotel 40'E,10'S tithe tax 10[100/700 intersection APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 435 DATE DRILLED: March 1a 2013 LOGGED BY: Chagdes R.Lane,P.E.,G.EJRay AAper6 W SOIL DESCRIPTION 15Y O REMARKS AI 81 titi 13. SPT-I 314"4 crashed rock FILL,gray,moist medium dense 10 clayey SILT with Use sand,red.brown,moist soft to 6 r recovery medium s06,trace organics(grasa roots)in upper pan of sdL 1 SPT-2 2 94 ?recovery s 4 S SPT-3 One sandy SILT,red-brown.wet,soft 2 76 60 19"reosvay 2 2 gmunewder7'e- _ SPT-4 sgy gas SAND,red-brawn,wet(saturated),very loose 1 34 10"recovery 1 1D 11117-5 1 33 1r recovery 3 well graded GRAVELS with silt and sand(bogy known 20 as'carnet gravels),gray,wet,medium dense,sand lenses SPT-11 17 4'sand recovery SILTSTONE lament Formation I.mat moist.hard 60(1') 2'Winton recovery Extremely Meth to Bang terminated at 13'9'due to pradkal auger refusal. remove Oaten from 16 the . Groundwater gust encountered during drill at appadvutely 7V. Boring was backtaled with badonte drips on 3Na13. 20 26 30 EARTH ENGINEERS, Inc. Date Received: 13.029-1(Append(X C,Boring Logs,DRAF1).x(9,B-I JUN 2 6 2013 Original Supmittal • APPENDIX C: BORING B-2 CUENT E.A Mite Combadfion Company EARTH ENGINEERS.INC.PROJECT NO.: 13426.1 PROJECT. Candlewood Suites,Springfield.Oregon 67477 EQUIPMENT: Diedrich 13-00 with auto SPT hammer LOCATION: For proposed hotel-50'E.25'N of the tax lot 100/700 Intersection APPROMATE ELEVATION: 434 DATE DRILLED: March 16,2013 LOGGED BY: Chagies R.Lane,P.E.G.EJRey Alipa6 Z REMARKS t,etas DESCRIPTION w °u I s g 3 I 3 18 R t •see note be below SPT-1 open graded GRAVEL,moist,loosee.subaounded gravels 1 clayey BILY with trace sand.red-brown,moist.soft to 2 T r000very medium aaB,trace organise(grass mots)o upper pad 01 505 2 SPT-2 2 Ss 36 4-recovery 2 2 6 SPT3 fine sandy SILT,raFbrown,wet.salt 2 a3 if recovery 4 6 stowaway 6' Sin-e'slay Bee SAND.rebaown,wet(saturated),nay loose 2 29 g ioosary 4 4 10 SPT-S I 2 33 6-recovery 4 well graded GRAVELS w0h slit and sand Vocally Imam 14 as'bar rut gravels).way,wet,medium dame,sand lenses = $ ILTSTONE(Eugene Forman=),gory,mast.had 8 E•recovery Extremely al0ara to 50 remove eaeMm from the sampler. 16 Bang terminated Mted at 14'due to practical ewer rdwaL Gmolaeaortaal encountered during dull at apprmdmatey B. Boring was baddl0ed with bMtaelta drips on 31'16113. At Boring B-2 Our open graded gravels were ordy r-r amctt overlying a canasta pad tor waIaway. However.these gravels are up to 4'-W In the sunamdOg area 20 25 30 - Date, Received: EARTH ENGINEERS, Inc' JUN 9 R Inn 13.029.1 (Appendbt C,Boring tags,DwFT).xis,8-2 Original Submittal • w w APPENDIX C: BORING 8-3 CLIENT: E.A.Wee Cmuaudon Company EARTH ENGINEERS.INC.PROJECT NO.: 13-029.1 PROJECT. Castlewood Suites,Springfield,Oregon 07477 EQUIPMENT: Diedrich D-90 and auto SFR hammer LOCATION: For proposed hotel-90 E,50 S or the tax lot 100/700 Intersection APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 433 DATE GRILLED: March 19,2013 LOGGED BY: Clergies R.Laos,P.E,G.EJRay A6ae t Is g • 9 9 SOIL DESCRIPTION m REMARKS oil: It 31 00 "9 axe x$ as rota $ • snit Clayey SILT NW1 trace sand,red-brown,moist soft to 1 P mown medium slot hate mats Ulna roots)In upper Pad 41 so9. 2 3 SPT-2 fine sandy SILT,red-tam,wet,soft 1 42 8'masonry 3 3 6 SP73 'silty fine SAND,r l-broom,wet(saturated),very loose 1 54 30 r recovery 1 for• 3 groundwater B' 'well graded GRAVELS with silt and sand gooey(Mown 20 e'corm as Isar na'gravels),way,wet medium dense,sand lenses 25 19 - SPT45 8'recovery — SPT6 .SILTSTONE Mumma rmn ikra I.was.mat hard 60(67 m ieMvery Boda9 tenet algid at 13'due to pradwl auger Mural 16 Groundwater find encountered during drill at apilteolimata V Boring was led led with aerdmdte Chips on 3N9/13. 20 F-- 25 30_ _ EARTH ENGINEERS, Inc. Date Received: JUN.2 o [U).1 13-029-1 (Appendix C.Boring togs,DRAFT).xis.B-3 Original SuPmittal • . APPENDIX C: BORING B-4 CUBIT: E.A.White Ccutstrucgon Company EARTH ENGINEERS.INC.PROJECT NO.: 13-029-1 PROJECT: Candtewood SuIts SPdtlflald.D1egon 97477 EQUIPMENT: Diedrich 0.99 end auto VT hammer LOCATION: For proposed hotel-50W 115'S of the NE property corer APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 433 DATE DRILLED: March 18 2013 LOGGED BY: Chanties R.Lane,P.E..G.EIRay Spent a $ 5 I 2E wE M G. 9 y SOIL DESCRIPTION 1 1 gR g g Z I 5 .... REMARKS o moo RI 8si gl ee..9 € SSSeeee 8A SPT-1 clayey SILT wNA trace sand,md.MOwn,moSL soft to 1 4'recovery mediums/It V n trace organics(Bra roots)In upper pmt of soil. 1 2 _ SPT-2 fins sandy SILT,red-brown,wet.Bolt 2 59 4'recovery 2 3 SPT4'siid fine SAND,red-brown.wet(saturated).very loose 3 30 4'recovery 1 3 SPT-4 I 1 31 groundwater IF 2 4'recovery — well graded GRAVELS with silt and sand(locally lawns 13 as'bar turf gravels),Way.wet.medium dense.send lenses 10 — eP74 li 4 B'recovery 13 28 SILTSTONE(Enigma Formation),grey,resold hard 21 gp7$' 17 8'MEOW/ 37 50(91 1 15 Boring temtatad at 14'due to Vmskel auger renal Grmmdwesc&st encounters during Mg at apprednatdy S. Boring was backlit wbh bentonie chips on 311WM 20 25 30 Dpte Received: EARTH ENGINEERS, Inc. JUN 2 6 2013 13-029-1 (Appendix C,Boring Logs,DRAFT).xls,B-4 Original Submittal ` r APPENDIX C: BORING B-5 CLIENT: E A Wills Construction Company EARTH ENGINEERS.INC.PROJECT NO: 11029-1 PROJECT: CaM9woo0 Suites,Springfield.Oregon 97477 EQUIPMENT: IXeddtlr D-90 and auto SPT banner LOCATION: For proposed hotel•70W,4PS of m.NE property comer APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 434 DATE DRILLED: March 19,2015 LOGGED BY: Chanties R.Lane.P.E.G..EEJRay Alpert' SOIL DESCRIPTION 1 4 1 1 1 n 1 pl .. REMARKS 4 m! d o rio pu m U.L it K aJ A.3 fi U 0. BORING 86 LOCATED NEAR THE NE CORNER OF THE SITE COULD NOT BE ACCESSED WITH THE DRILL RIG DUE TO TREES AND OVERHEAD WIRES. S 10 IS 20 30 Date flccaivod: EARTH ENGINEERS, Inc. IIIN 7 s 91113 13-029-1 (Appendix C,Boring Logs,DRAFflids,B-5 Original Submittal r APPENDIX C: BORING B-6 CLIENT: E.A.Wilts Cmisbudon Company EARTI ENGINEERS.INC.PROJECT NO.: 15029.1 PROJECT: Candlswood Suites.Springfield,Oragan 97477 EQUIPMENT: Dledsdi 0.90 and auto SPT hammer LOCATION: For proposed pandng lot-05 ,2105 of the NE property comet APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 432 DATE DRILLED: Mardi 19,2013 LOGGED BY: Maples R.Lane.P.E.G.EJRay Allperd N SOIL DESCRIPTION o u g N k REMARKS 2 t c - o S 2g. SPT•1 clayey SILT with trace sand,rad-brown,mold soft to 2 JS S noway medium still Vane organics(grass roots)In upper part of sold 2 4 SPT-2 1 33 TreowaY 1 2 6 SPT.1 fine sandy SILT,red-brown,wet,soft 1 29 T=way Bang terminated at ST. Groundwater was not encountered. Boring was bad"d with ber toniteddpson Sn911J. 10 16 20 25 OD innin tr aivprF EARTH ENGINEERS, Inc. JUN 2 6 2013 13-029-1(Appendbc C,Boring Logs,DRAFT)icls,B-6 Original Submittal • • APPENDIX C: BORING B-7 CLIENT: E.A.Mite Construction Company EARTH ENGINEERS,INC.PROJECT NO.: 17428.1 PROJECT. Canmewood Suites,Springlletd,Oregon 97477 EOU9314ENT: Diedrich DSO and sub SPT hemmer LOCATION: For proposed persbg lot-120W,195S of the NE property comer APPROXIMATE ELEVATOR: 432 DATE DRILLED: March 1%2013 LOGGED BY: Maples R Lana P.E.GEJRay AdpeM F � k •� J SOIL DESCRIPTION b Eg al a t Q REMARKS w a mw II 8 4 113 8PT-t clayey SILT with trace ward.d.re6brown.moist soft to 1 7e es recovery medium sag,trace organics(grass mots)In upper part of soli. 2 2 SPT-2 1 44 S recovery 2 3 BATS Site sandy SILT,red-brown.wet.soft g M T IBCOYeIy t 2 Boring Marketed at S'8'. Groundwater was not encountered. Boring was Paddled tenbnhe chips on 7118111 Lit IS 20 2$ m natte Received: EARTH ENGINEERS, InC.JUN 2 6 2013 13-029-1(Appendix C,Boring Logs,owFT).>ds,8-7 Original Submittal , , • • APPENDIX D: SOIL CLASSIFICATION LEGEND APPARENT CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS (PECK;HANSON&TNORNBURN 1974,AASHTO 1988)' Descriptor SPT N66 Pocket Penetrometer, Torvane Field Approximation (blows/foot)' OP(tsf) (1sf) Very Soft <2 <0.25 <0.12 Easily penetrated several inches by fist Soft 2-4 0.25-0.50 0.12-0.25 Easily penetrated several inches by thumb Medium Stiff 5-8 0.50-1.0 0.25-0.50 Penetrated several inches by thumb w/moderate effort Stiff 9-15 1.0-2.0 0.50-1.0 Readily indented by thumbnail Very Stiff 16-30 2.0-4.0 1.0-2.0 Indented by thumb but penetrated only with great effort Hard >30 >4.0 >2.0 Indented by thumbnail with difficulty •Using SPT No is considered a crude approximation for cohesive soils. APPARENT DENSITY OF COHESIONLESS MOISTURE • SOILS(AASHTO 1988) '.- (ASTM 02488.06)'• ' ' Descriptor SPT Na Value(blows/foot) Descriptor Criteria Very Loose 0-4 Absence of moisture,dusty,dry to the touch,well Dry below optimum moisture content(per ASTM Loose 5-10 D698 or D1557) Medium Dense 11 -30 Moist Damp but no visible water Dense 31 -50 Visible free water,usually soil is below water Wet table,well above optimum moisture content(per Very Dense >50 ASTM D698 or D1557) PERCENT-PR PROFORTION:OF.SOILS.i `' " ' SOILPARTICLE,SIZE r. r' , ''' (ASTM 0248846). "' ,. ., `... {ASTM-02488.06) , t- • „# ". _. Descriptor Criteria Descriptor Size Trace Particles are present but estimated<5% Boulder > 12 inches Few 5-10% Cobble 3 to 12 inches Little 15-25% Gravel - Coarse %inch to 3 inches Some 30-45% Fine No.4 sieve to%inch Mostly 50-100% Sand - 'Coarse No. 10 to No.4 sieve(4.75mm) Medium No.40 to No. 10 sieve(2mm) Percentages are estimated to nearest 5%in the field. Fine No.200 to No.40 sieve(.425mm) Use'about*unless percentages are based on Silt and Clay('fines') Passing No.200 sieve(0.075mm) laboratory testing. '+ , ,.. ,'_t l'..-t. °UNIFIED`SOILCLASSIF.ICATION''SYSTEIVIASTM 02488) 4.' , . ` • '. . ,• ,.- Major Division Group Description Symbol Coarse (50% Clean GW Well-graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines Gravel or Grained aned Gravel GP Poorly graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures.little or no fines more retained Soils on No.4 si Gravel GM Silty gravels and gravel-sand-silt mixtures eve) with fines GC Clayey gravels and gravel-sand-day mixtures more than Clean SW Well-graded sands and gravelly sands,little or no fines 50% retained Sand(>50% sand SP Poorly-graded sands and gravelly sands,little or no fines on#200 Passing No.4 Sand SM Silty sands and sand-silt mixtures sieve) sieve) with fines SC Clayey sands and sand-day mixtures Fine Grained Sllt and Clay ML Inorganic silts, rock flour and clayey silts Soils (liquid limit<50) CL Inorganic days of low-medium plasticity,gravelly, sandy&lean days OL Organic silts and organic silty days of low plasticity (50%or more Silt and Clay MH Inorganic silts and clayey silts passing#200 CH Inorganic clays or high plasticity,fat clays sieve) (liquid limit>50) OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity HI hg ly Organic Soils PT Peat,muck and other highly organic soils G RAPHIC'SYMBOL-`LEGEND dleMt TT Earth GRAB Grab sample ' SPT Standard Penetration Test(2'OD),ASTM D1586 va C1- Engineers. ST Shelby Tube,ASTM 01587(pushed) �� ��,,,„9 'i Dames and Moore ring sampler(3.25'ODDag�-(�®4,-4Dflvmd•• 'T7Te,^' Inc.IIIC . , CORE r Rock coring JUN 262013 Orig±nal Submittal • • Attachment '14' Tik stik 1651 Centennial BNd.•Springfield,OR 97477 260 Country Club Rd,Ste 120•Eugene,OR 97401 P.O.Box 931• Springfield,OR 97477 P.O.Box 10211•Eugene,OR 97440 Phone: 541.741.1981 $ Phone: 541.687.9794 Fax: 541.741.0619 � • Fax: 641.687.0924 Evergreen Lana Tine Company TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES• ESCROW CLOSINGS June 17,2013 Order No. 12-7314 SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT City of Springfield do Leahy,Van VactorPartial Billing Cox&Melendy, LLP Additional Chain $100.00 188 West B Street Bldg N Springfield, OR 97477 Attn: Joe Leahy TOTAL $100.00 e-mail: jil@emeraldlaw.com Dear Joe Leahy: We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies as applied for,with coverage's as Indicated, based on this preliminary report. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO Showing fee simple title as of June 11,2013,at 8:00 a.m.,vested in: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms,conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7314 Page 1 of JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Fads, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records;reservations or exceptions in • patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,encroachments or other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records, CURRENT EXCEPTIONS: 6. The real property taxes for the fiscal year 2012-2013 are exempted by virtue of State Property Ownership. The company assumes no liability should the exempt status be lifted and taxes levied. (Map No. 17-03-33-44-00100, Code 04-80,Account No.0295749) 7. Rights of the public and of governmental bodies in and to that portion of that portion of the premises herein described lying below the high water mark of the Slough as shown on assessment map and the ownership of the State of Oregon in and to that portion lying below the high water mark thereof. 8. Any adverse claim based upon the assertion that the location of the Slough as shown on assessment map has moved and that any portion of the subject property has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portions so created,or based on the provisions of ORS 274.905 through 274.940. 9. Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way,including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded August 3, 1944, Book 272,Page 95,Reception No. 138759, Lane County Oregon Records. 10. Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way,including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded August 3, 1944, Book 272, Page 107, Reception No. 138764,Lane County Oregon Records. 11. Restriction of Access set out in Deed Recorded September 28, 1950,Book 424, Page 215, Reception No.29455, Lane County Oregon Records. 12. Restriction of Access set out in Decree in Condemnation Suit entered February 19, 1959, Case No. 51586, Lane County Circuit Court Records. 13. Restriction of Access set forth in Deed to the State of Oregon, Including the terms and provisions thereof,by Instrument Recorded in Book 418, Page 189,and modified by instrument Recorded April 20, 1962, Reception No.66778,Lane County Oregon Records. 14. Ordinance No.17866, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded March 3, 1977,Reception No.77-12011, Lane County Oregon Records. Order No.: 12-7314 Date Received: Pepe 2 of 4 JUN 262013 Original Submittal • • 15. Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan Notice, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded December 14,2004,Reception No. 2004-095229,Lane County Oregon Records. 16. Reservation of Mineral Estate as reserved by The State of Oregon in Bargain and Sale Deed to The City of Springfield, Recorded July 31, 2009, Reception No. 2009-044325,Lane County Oregon Records. 17. Easement for Ingress and Egress,Including the terms and provisions thereof, by Instrument . Recorded July 31,2009, Reception No.2009-044326, Lane County Oregon Records. NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: Unknown Franklin Boulevard, Springfield, OR 97477. NOTE: A Judgment/Lien/Bankruptcy Search was done for the name(s)CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, and as of June 11,2013,none were found. NOTE: As of June 11,2013,there are no liens for the City of Springfield. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY FINDS NO NOTICE OF RESCISSION RECORDED IN THE LAST 24 MONTHS. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all changes back to the deed which vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows: BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED JULY 31,2009, FROM THE STATE OF OREGON, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD,A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF OREGON, RECEPTION NO.2009-044325. NOTE: SUPPLEMENTED TO UPDATE REPORT. Very truly yours, EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY • HOME OFFICE By: Joseph M. Silence Title Officer ce: NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED,A MINIMUM CANCELLATION FEE OF$200.00 WILL BE CHARGED. Date Received: • Order No.: 12-7314 Pape 3 of 4 JUN 2 6 2013 • • Original Submittal • • EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land lying in the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No.68,and also in the Southeast one- quarter of Section 33,Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,in Lane County, Oregon,said parcel being bounded on the Southerly boundary by the parcel of property described in that certain Warranty Deed wherein Dale Fischer,inditiidually and as trustee for Alexandria Fischer Morse and David Dodd Fischer, appears as Grantor,and Lane County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, appears as Grantee,which Deed was recorded in Lane County Official Records on August 6, 1976, under Reception No.76-40388, being bounded on the Easterly boundary by the parcel of property described in that certain Warranty Deed wherein Roy Jenkins and Edith Jenkins,appear as Grantors, and Cecil R. Armes and Elaine K.Armes, husband and wife,appear as Grantees,which Deed was Recorded December 22, 1972, Reception no. 33745, Lane County Official Records,being bounded on the North by the Southerly right-of-way line of Franklin Boulevard(McKenzie Highway),and being bounded on the West by that tract of land described in Deed to the State of Oregon,by and through its State Highway Division, Recorded July 29, 1942, Book 234, Page 292, Lane County Oregon Records, in Lane County, Oregon. • Date Received: Order No.: 12-7314 Page 4 of 4 JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • ,ate 9-^tu_s "�z --f� rr- �4 sal'' . : Na16. k t i sa,srsazs ' ZSO(5000 O'JOOOOC)-6GOGOOOOl-7pijufiC IC 1\ FREEWAY E \ f is 8 1 n:= -� .. _ _ gin•= =r—� , m v, + ZL'0p= O -ron�n 8 m -c = ' v i_,f9Thit,.77; 1 11■ ■ ' \ SZ ���� �- '0 =CW :la �_ m m co 0 6 1 a \ + la,- l .10'.' k \ �, ? 11 i .:x p to Al O / {s r. 0 a \ { gj Xw1 \ { 11 1 , ' i 0 11 \ { { 1 Y� g \ ' 1 1 * i 1 1 1. 1 1 f 1 , { O t " � �� ' Date Reeer,r - -N --. . ,4 � j ' . . t JUN 2 6 20;3 !nil Submittal f S • Privacy Policy Notice As adopted July 1, 2001 Evergreen Land Title Company Private Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Tale V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution. directly or through its affiliates.from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices. such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. in compliance with the GLBA• we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Evergreen Land Title Company. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you. such as on applications or other forms. • • Information about your transactions we secure from our files,or from our affiliates or others. • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. • Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have Joint marketing agreements: • Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance. securities and insurance. • Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WIT H ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical. electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal _ ; • • Attachment '15' 7-14 1651 Centennial Blvd.•Springfield,OR 97477 26D Country Club Rd,Ste 120•Eugene,OR 97401 P.O.Box 931• Springfield,OR 97477 ^... P.O.Box 10211•Eugene,OR 97440 541.687 Phone: Phone: 7.0924 Fex:x; 5541.741.41.08819 ' Fax: Evergreen Lana Ttne Compit:Y TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES• ESCROW CLOSINGS June 17,2013 Order No. 12-7315 SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT City of Springfield do Leahy,Van VactorPartial Billing Cox&Melendy, LLP Additional Chain $100.00 188 West B Street Bldg N Springfield, OR 97477 Attn: Joe Leahy TOTAL $100.00 e-mail: jjl @emeraldlaw.com Dear Joe Leahy: We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies as applied for,with coverage's as indicated,based on this preliminary report. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO Showing fee simple title as of June 11,2013,at 8:00 a.m.,vested in: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD,a Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7315 JUN 2 6 2013 Page 1 of4 Original Submittal SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area,encroachments or other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material,equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. CURRENT EXCEPTIONS: 6. The real property taxes for the fiscal year 2012-2013 are exempted by virtue of State Property ownership. The company assumes no liability should the exempt status be lifted and taxes levied. (Map No. 17-03-33-44-00200,Code 0480,Account No.0295772) 7. Rights of the public and of governmental bodies in and to that portion of that portion of the premises herein described lying below the high water mark of the Slough as shown on assessment map and the ownership of the State of Oregon in and to that portion lying below the high water mark thereof. 8. Any adverse claim based upon the assertion that the location of the Slough as shown on assessment map has moved and that any portion of the subject property has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portions so created,or based on the provisions of ORS 274.905 through 274.940. 9. Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way,including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded August 3, 1944, Book 272, Page 95, Reception No. 138759, Lane County Oregon Records. 10. Grant of Easement and Right-of-Way, Including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded August 3,1944, Book 272,Page 107, Reception No. 138764,Lane County Oregon Records. 11. Restriction of Access set out in Deed Recorded September 28, 1950, Book 424,Page 215, Reception No.29455, Lane County Oregon Records. 12. Restriction of Access set out in Decree in Condemnation Suit entered February 19, 1959,Case No.51588,Lane County Circuit Court Records. 13. Restriction of Access set forth In Deed to the State of Oregon,including the terms and provisions thereof,by Instrument Recorded in Book 418, Page 189, and modified by instrument Recorded April 20, 1962,Reception No.66778, Lane County Oregon Records. 14. Ordinance No. 17866, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded March 3, 1977, Reception No.77-12011, Lane County Oregon Records. Order No.: 12-7315 Date Received: Page 2 of 4 JUN 262013 Original Submittal_ • • 15. Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan Notice, including the terms and provisions thereof,by instrument Recorded December 14,2004, Reception No. 2004-095229, Lane County Oregon Records. 16. Reservation of Mineral Estate as reserved by The State of Oregon in Bargain and Sale Deed to The City of Springfield, Recorded July 31, 2009, Reception No.2009-044325, Lane County Oregon Records. 17. Easement for Ingress and Egress, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded July 31,2009, Reception No.2009-044326, Lane County Oregon Records. NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: Not Known, Springfield, OR 97477. NOTE: A Judgment/Lien/Bankruptcy Search was done for the name(s)CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, and as of June 11,2013,none were found. NOTE: As of June 11,2013,there are no liens for the City of Springfield. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY FINDS NO NOTICE OF RESCISSION RECORDED IN THE LAST 24 MONTHS. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all changes back to the deed which vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows: BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED JULY 31,2009, FROM THE STATE OF OREGON, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD,A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF OREGON, RECEPTION NO.2009-044325. NOTE: SUPPLEMENTED TO UPDATE REPORT. Very truly yours, EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY HOME OFFICE By: Joseph M. Silence Title Officer cc: NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED,A MINIMUM CANCELLATION FEE OF$200.00 WILL BE CHARGED. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7315 Page 3of4 JUN-2 6 2013 Original Submittal EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION , A parcel of land lying in the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No. 68, also in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 33,Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,said parcel being described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Westerly line of that tract of land conveyed to State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, by Deed Recorded in Book 224, Page 292, Lane County Oregon Records, said point being opposite and 270.5 feet distant Southerly from(when measured at right angles to)the centerline of the Pacific Highway at Engineer's Station 195+83.5;said point also being 560.8 feet South and 1291.5 feet West of the Northeast corner of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No.68; thence South 16°30'East along said Westerly property line 28.7 feet to an axle marking the Southwest corner of said property:thence South 72°50'East along the Southerly line of said property 220.6 feet; thence North 16°30'West along the Easterly line of said property 155.15 feet;thence South 72°11'30' West 183.5 feet to the Point of Beginning,in Lane County,Oregon. G Date Received: Order 4or4 r No.: 12-7316 Pe JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • 'L 'I Vy KLS "'Y • . -'S a d.4.°''�'_y"-v° :�3~.35x1.. ,n._. li YOlY aa'oodo ooa0000clood0000`003500 IC \ \ Z FREEWAY D Wfi --3 \ m _ fl u={ . cm 0 to F 6 nn ^ � D, O / -1 Hi Z 1 T 11, I n 11\ . t � : s \ tip' 1 t 1\ 1 =_ 1 I o , 1.tt \ Ii a 0 oi11 ` 1 ° , 1 ' i1 YIA \R + I`l 1 1, � ' 1 1\ 1 \1 1 ; 2'3 i i "\. 1 .r el y'Y o ;- . v' #fix'. ' 6 `m �x �� = Date Rv t �rz �3 1 ° �_ ed: rtf_ . , I♦-F� c xi JUN 262013 ` d �,Mr s�F 'tr k=>�.. e Fotr �l Yxz. .,..�. 1� ... i i • 1/.. • • • • • • Privacy Policy Notice As adopted July 1, 2001 Evergreen Land Title Company Private Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution. directly or through its affiliates. from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. in compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Evergreen Land Title Company. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms. • Information about your transactions we secure from our files,or from our affiliates or others. • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. • Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice. no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: • Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance. securities and insurance. • Non-financiai companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know • that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical. electronic. and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. • Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal • • Attachment '7' • Alg 1651 Centennial Blvd.• Springfield,OR 97477 260 Country Club Rd,Ste 120•Eugene,OR 97401 P.O.Box 931 • Springfield,OR 97477 P.O.Box 10211 •Eugene,OR 97440 Phone: 541.741.1981 "t3a Phone: 541.687.9794 Fax: 541.741.0619 �� Fax: 541.687.0924 Evergreen land Tine Company TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES • ESCROW CLOSINGS June 11, 2013 Order No. 12-7261 SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT City of Springfield do Leahy, Van VactorPartial Billing Cox& Melendy, LLP Additional Chain $100.00 188 West B Street Bldg N Springfield, OR 97477 Attn: Bill Van Vactor TOTAL $100.00 e-mail: bw @emeraldlaw.com Dear Bill Van Vactor: We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies as applied for, with coverage's as indicated, based on this preliminary report. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO Showing fee simple title as of June 05, 2013, at 8:00 a.m., vested in: ALPESH PATEL AND KOMAL PATEL, as tenants by the entirety Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Order No.: 12-7261 Page 1 of 4 Original Submittal , • • • • SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. CURRENT EXCEPTIONS: 6. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 7. Any adverse claim based upon the assertion that the location of Slough has moved and that any portion of the subject property has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portions so created, or based on the provisions of ORS 274.905 through 274.940. 8. Easement, granted to Glenwood Water District, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded September 21, 1995, Reception No. 95-53025, Lane County Oregon Records. 9. Urban Renewal Plan for Glenwood, including the terms and provisions thereof, as set forth by instrument Recorded December 14, 2004, Reception No. 2004-095229. 10. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 11. Lease as disclosed by Lane County Tax Rolls. NOTE: Taxes, Map No. 17-03-34-33-00700, Code 04-28, Account No. 1507381, 2012-2013, $101.43, paid in full. (Account Assessed to CBS Outdoor Inc.) Taxes, Map No. 17-03-34-33-00700, Code 04-28, Account No. 0299436, 2012-2013, $2,598.77, paid in full. NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: 3005-3007 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403. NOTE: A Judgment/Lien/Bankruptcy Search was done for the name(s)ALPESH PATEL AND KOMAL PATEL, and as of June 05, 2013, none were found. NOTE: As of June 5, 2013, there are no liens for the City of Eugene. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY FINDS NO NOTICE OF RESCISSION RECORDED IN THE LAST 24 MONTHS. Date Received: Order No.: 12-7261 JUN 2 6 2013 Page 2 of 4 Original Submittal • • INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all changes back to the deed which vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows: WARRANTY DEED RECORDED JULY 5, 2007, FROM MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO. FSB SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE ELAINE H. ARMES TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 27, 2001 AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2004, TO ALPESH PATEL AND KOMAL PATEL, AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETY, RECEPTION NO. 2007-046005. NOTE: SUPPLEMENTED TO UPDATE REPORT, SHOW TAXES PAID AND DELETE EXCEPTION#10 WHICH IS NOW SATISFIED. Very truly yours, EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY HOME OFFICE By: Joseph M. Silence Title Officer cc: NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED,A MINIMUM CANCELLATION FEE OF$200.00 WILL BE CHARGED. Date Received: JUN 262013 Order No.: 12-7261 Page 3 of 4 Original Submittal [ s • • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point in the North line of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No. 68, Notification No. 3284 In Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, 14.45 chains South 73° 30'West from the Northeast corner thereof and running thence South 5.44 chains to the center of the slough running Easterly and Westerly through said claim, thence up the center of said slough North 87° East 1.77 chains, thence North parallel with the East line of said daim 5.88 chains, to the North line of said daim and thence South 73° 30'West 1.85 chains to the place of beginning, being a part of said Donation Land Claim in Lane County, State of Oregon. ALSO: Beginning at a point on South line of Pacific Highway right of way South 0° 03' East 57.8 feet from a point which is on North line of Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim and which point is South 74° 12'West 831.6 feet from the Northeast corner of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No. 68, in Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, thence along South fine of Pacific Highway right of way North 74°01'30" East 57.0 feet, thence South 1° 0' East 360.0 feet to center of slough, thence South 88° West 55.3 feet, thence North 0° 03'West 388.1 feet, more or less, to point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. Date Received: Order No 12-7261 JUN 2 6 2013 Page 4 of 4 Original Submittal • ■ • �_ P T -4_ 'tin's-3 11, e_ : ✓ -r>n frame- w .n- a r ' co Z -n C0 S x E 1z ° a` -_ ra � . t 7 -13_f _• t =:! 6 tt •3t` �zg no--i ell y y 1 ''"-` -7 "--.78--------.71-z (gym (' -c, • a. reTlei Pi l i a t 1t� S t F ., .�... t f Y 4 . 2 O • ,VtYl1, �,rat O a. 1. ,t 'I;� i1 . E a - _= r .,, FA:: 1t O &g I. \ 11 , J 0 I W LA �-... 3, ',� . _ � om _ _:.J. Y—n i d:�F. � { Date Relve S•3 3 S m. 1 'x= i JUN 2 6 2013 r= s -t rY '. v —:+e1�'L '''r = .; S —z , u '� ' 3Friginal Submittal Produced by Evergreen Land Title on 6/11/2013 at 3:18PM using RLID(www.rlid.orgill Page 1 of 1 Lane County Property Taxes Due Report Tax Account# 1507381 Alternate Property#(maplot) 17-03-34-33-00700 Tax Code Area (TCA) 00428 Location Taxpayer CBS OUTDOOR INC PO BOX 404 BROADWAY, NJ 08808 Property Values & Taxes ,1'�Ii1R4110arket,Value;(RMV) ' ti `3'' t ' {" � i,u _ I�r M..�., 4..,. ,df v � l �i sl 1 ��.��'.idl�� l��l�l�l : Land Improvement Total Total Assessed Value Tax 2012 0 10,979 10,979 6,337 101.43 2011', 0 10,980 10,980 6,152 99.54 Current Year Assessed Value 6,337.00 Less Exemption Amount ( 0.00) Taxable Value 6,337.00 Frozen Assessed Value 0.00 Exemption Type Account Status Account Status Account Status Notes •Active Account Current Tax Year Related Accounts 0299436 Remarks Billboard Taxes Due for Account # 1507381 Delinquent Interest (if applicable)Computed Through: 6/11/2013 The tax shown is the amount certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property, resulting in a tax correction. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. ,Yea '; , II''11 C)escnption11,1 1 q + ;i:;Tax' E Mirumtiml Due',Date' i', 2012 Property Tax Principal 101.43 0.00 11/15/2012 Taxes &Assessments due for Account Number 1507381: $0.00 Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal I Productd by Evergreen Land Titlit/11/2013 at 3:18PM using RLID(www.rlid.or Page 1 of 1 Lane County Property Taxes Due Report . . . Tax Account# 0299436 Alternate Property#(maplot) 17-03-34-33-00700 Tax Code Area(TCA) 00428 Location 3005 FRANKLIN BLVD EUGENE, OR 97403-2265* Taxpayer PATEL ALPESH & KOMAL 1857 FRANKLIN BLVD EUGENE, OR 97403 Multiple site addresses exist on this tax account. Property Values & Taxes � it i' 'Real Mark"et Value'" RMV a� p p `r' " i• � � I I ._.... t ... � . . (, . .) f,�l;�it fli ��a lllr+tA{;,., ii i ti � � 6'Ifl r�s Land Improvement Total Total Assessed Value Tax 2012 216,284 ' 60,902 277,186 162,359 2,598.77 201;1 216,284 58,003 274,287 157,630 2,550.55 Current Year Assessed Value 162,359.00 Less Exemption Amount ( 0.00) Taxable Value 162,359.00 Frozen Assessed Value 0.00 Exemption Type Account Status Account Status Account Status Notes •Active Account Current Tax Year Related Accounts 1507381; 5645685 Remarks none Taxes Due for Account # 0299436 Delinquent Interest(if applicable)Computed Through: 6/11/2013 The tax shown is the amount certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property, resulting in a tax correction. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. l,Year 1:!,;,,; Descnptiorrl, ,.I Tax i:'[Minlmuin ",. Due Date,' 2012 Property Tax Principal 2,598.77 0.00 11/15/2012 Taxes &Assessments due for Account Number 0299436: $0.00 Date Received: JUN 262013 Original Submittal Privacy Policy Notice As adopted July 1, 2001 Evergreen Land Title Company . Private Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Evergreen Land Title Company. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms. • Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others. • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. • Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: • Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. • Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Date Received: JUN 2 6 2013 Original Submittal