HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous Field Test & Inspection Report 2013-5-31 (3) Fin information
�o'am .To Build On S l 2-23 7 0
Engineering•Consulting• Testing
DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT OF
SINGLE-PLY THERMOPLASTIC ROOFING
Date: 5/31/13
PROJECT INFORMATION
Client: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Store#4178) Work Area: Various Areas
Project Name: Roofing Project Manufacturer: Johns Manville 60 mil reinforced TPO
Location: Springfield, OR Insulation Type: JM Energy 3 Isocyanurate
PSI Report No.: 654137-85-14 Contractor: Central Oregon Roofing
PSI Hours Worked: 12.0 Approximate Contractor Hours Worked: 12.0
•
SIGNATURES
Sam Stoner Isaac Doug Roth, RRO
PSI Quality Assurance Observer
Roofing Contractor Reviewed By:
Representative PSI Project Manager
PROJECT STATUS AT-A-GLANCE
Today's Performance Comment
Construction today? ®Yes ❑No If No Construction, Inspection Done?❑ Yes ❑No
Contractor performance issues? ❑Yes ® No
Schedule/scope issues? ❑Yes ® No
DAILY PRODUCTION
Total Square Feet Completed To Date
Previously Today's Total Square Total Square
Roof Section Completed Square Feet Feet Feet in Tu Complete
Square Feet Completed Completed Section
Main Roof Area 38,544 0 38,544 39,049 98.7
..,,,' r ::1 "'• ; 38,544 39,049 98.7
Crew Size—4 Roofers—4
Sheet Metal Workers—0
Page 1 of 4
PSI Project No:654137 Date: 5-31-13
WEATHER CONDITIONS & EMERGENCY COVER
® Dry ❑ Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Windy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp Range (low-high) 40°to 70° F
Emergency cover/protection on-site? ZYes❑No Type of Protection-TPO & EPDM membrane
MATERIALS CONTROL & STORAGE
In original identified packaging? Z Yes❑ No Off ground or deck? ® Yes Q No
Covered and vented? ®Yes❑ No Roll goods stored on side? ® Yes Q No
Adhesive storage temperature Unapproved, damaged, or wet
❑Yes® No ❑Yes No
maintained? material? If Yes, how disposed?
Comments: Stored material protection appears adequate.
SUBSTRATE PREPARATION
Night tie-in removed? ®Yes Q No Substrate clean and debris ®Yes ❑ No
removed?
Substrate and penetrations ready? ® Yes Q No Substrate tested for dryness? ®Yes❑ No
Comments: Substrates that received new roofing components appeared clean and dry.
COVER BOARD APPLICATION (1" ENERGY 3)
Correct Number of fasteners& Rhino Additional fasteners at
Plates?(12 in corners, 9 at perimeter, 0 Yes Q No perimeters and corners? Yes Q No
6 in the field)
Fasteners checked by technician? ® Yes❑ No Short insulation joints ® Yes❑ No
staggered?
New/Existing Insulation joints tight? ®Yes❑ No All joints staggered between
layers? ® Yes❑ No
Gaps filled with spray foam? ®Yes❑ No Drainage crickets installed per
plans and specifications? ®Yes ❑ No
Comments: Cover board was installed on an existing cricket at B from 3 to 6.
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO)
Membrane allowed to relax prior to ®Yes❑ No Membrane fully welded to Rhino ®Yes❑ No
attachment? Plates?
Mchnic ne plate welds checked by Yes Q No Membrane properly lapped? ® Yes Q No
Seams clean prior to welding? ®Yes❑ No Continuous weld achieved? ®Yes ❑ No
Page 2 of 4
PSI Project No:654137 Date: 5-31-13
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) (CONT'D)
Membrane flow at lap welds? ®Yes ❑ No Seams probed by technician 0 Yes❑ No
Cut edge sealant installed? ❑Yes® No T-patches installed? ❑ Yes® No
Primary field membrane termination ®Yes❑ No
(T-bar) installed?
Comments: TPO membrane was adhered to the cricket noted above. Field membrane was terminated at
the bottom using plates and screws at 1Z centers. Cricket membrane was secured at the top with
termination bar.
BASE FLASHING APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO)
Substrate clean and prepared? ® Yes❑No Adhesive applied to substrate ® Yes ❑ No
and allowed to dry?
Adhesive applied to back of base
flashing? Yes❑ No Adhesive allowed to flash off? ®Yes❑ No
Flashing pressed onto substrate to ®Yes❑ No Flashing properly lapped onto ® Yes❑ No
promote adhesion? field membrane?
Seams cleaned prior to welding? ®Yes❑ No Membrane flow at welds? ® Yes❑ No
Manufacturer's approved corner ®Yes❑ No
Continuous weld achieved? ®Yes❑ No patches installed?
Seams probed by technician 0 Yes❑ No Cut edge sealant installed? ❑ Yes® No
Termination bars installed? ® Yes❑ No Counterflashings installed? ❑ Yes® No
Comments: Wall section was base flashed at G from 1 to 1.9 and 1 from B to G.
NIGHT TIE-IN! DAMAGE/SITE CLEANUP INSPECTION
Night seal installed? 0 Yes❑ No Roofing appears watertight? ®Yes ❑ No
Roof drain flashings completed? ❑Yes® No Damage to property? ❑ Yes® No
Damage to client's equipment? ❑ Yes® No Site broom clean? ❑ Yes® No
All debris removed from roof? ❑Yes® No Roof materials and equipment ®Yes❑ No
appear secured?
Comments:Areas of new TPO roofing appear to be watertight. The roof needs to be cleaned off.
Page 3 of 4
•
PSI Project No:654137 Date: 5-31-13
DETAIL INSTALLATION (NOTE DRAWINGS USED AS REFERENCE)
Detail# Detail Name Construction Summary(Quantity/Description/Comment)
2-A4.1 Flashing Membrane Parapets were flashed per Detail Drawing.
SUMMARY OF TODAY'S WORK/ DEVIATIONS/SPECIAL NOTES:
Summary Comments:Work completed today appeared to conform to project plans and specifications.
Unresolved EVOCO Deviation Number(s):0
Special Notes: None today.
Respectfully Submitted,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.
PSI Roof Observer: Sam Stoner
CC: Portland, OR—One copy electronically
Reviewed By: Doug Roth, RRO
Page 4 of 4