Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous Field Test & Inspection Report 2013-6-3 (3) rs Inforntation rte' .To Build On 1 2 - 2210 Engineering•Consulting•Testing DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT OF SINGLE-PLY THERMOPLASTIC ROOFING Date: 6/3/13 PROJECT INFORMATION Client: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Store#4178) Work Area:Various Areas Project Name: Roofing Project Manufacturer: Johns Manville 60 mil reinforced TPO Location: Springfield, OR Insulation Type: JM Energy 3 Isocyanurate PSI Report No.: 654137-100-15 Contractor: Central Oregon Roofing PSI Hours Worked: 12.0 Approximate Contractor Hours Worked: 12.0 SIGNATURES Sam Stoner Isaac Doug Roth, RRO PSI Quality Assurance Observer Roofing Contractor Reviewed By: Representative PSI Project Manager PROJECT STATUS AT-A-GLANCE Today's Performance Comment Construction today? ®Yes ❑ No If No Construction, Inspection Done? ❑Yes ❑ No Contractor performance issues? ❑Yes ® No Schedule/scope issues? ❑Yes ® No DAILY PRODUCTION Total Square Feet Completed To Date Previously Today's Total Square Total Square Roof Section Completed Square Feet Feet Feet in % Complete Square Feet Completed Completed Section Main Roof Area 38,544 0 38,544 39,049 98.7 ..i":p42 1 I• ' •, i• 38,544 39,049 98.7) Crew Size—4 Roofers—4 Sheet Metal Workers—0 Page 1 of 4 PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 6-3-13 WEATHER CONDITIONS & EMERGENCY COVER Z Dry ® Sunny ❑ Cloudy ®Windy [' Rain ❑ Snow Temp Range (low-high) 46°to 76° F Emergency cover/protection on-site? ZYes❑No Type of Protection -TPO & EPDM membrane MATERIALS CONTROL& STORAGE In original identified packaging? ®Yes❑ No Off ground or deck? ® Yes ❑No Covered and vented? 0 Yes❑ No Roll goods stored on side? ® Yes❑ No Adhesive storage temperature ❑Yes No Unapproved, damaged, or wet ❑ Yes 0 No maintained? ® material? If Yes, how disposed? Comments: Stored material protection appears adequate. SUBSTRATE PREPARATION Night tie-in removed? ❑Yes ® No Substrate clean and debris ® Yes❑ No removed? Substrate and penetrations ready? ®Yes❑ No Substrate tested for dryness? ® Yes ❑ No Comments: Substrates that received new roofing components appeared clean and dry. COVER BOARD APPLICATION (1" ENERGY 3) Correct Number of fasteners &Rhino Additional fasteners at Plates?(12 in corners, 9 at perimeter, ❑ Yes❑ No perimeters and corners? El Yes ❑ No 6 in the field) Fasteners checked by technician? ❑Yes❑ No Short insulation joints ❑ Yes ❑ No staggered? All joints staggered between New/Existing Insulation joints tight? ❑Yes❑ No layers? ❑Yes ❑ No Gaps filled with spray foam? ❑Yes❑ No Drainage crickets installed per ❑Yes❑ No plans and specifications? _ Comments: None installed today. SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) Membrane allowed to relax prior to ❑Yes❑ No Membrane fully welded to Rhino ❑ Yes❑ No attachment? Plates? Membrane/plate welds checked by technician? ❑Yes❑ No Membrane properly lapped? ❑Yes❑ No Seams clean prior to welding? ❑Yes❑ No Continuous weld achieved? ❑ Yes❑ No Page 2 of 4 PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 6-3-13 SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) (CONT'D) Membrane flow at lap welds? ❑Yes❑ No Seams probed by technician ❑Yes ❑ No Cut edge sealant installed? ❑Yes❑ No T-patches installed? ❑Yes❑ No Primary field membrane termination ❑Yes❑ No (T-bar) installed? Comments: None installed today. BASE FLASHING APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) Substrate clean and prepared? N Yes❑ No Adhesive applied to substrate ® Yes❑ No and allowed to dry? Adhesive applied to back of base flashing? N Yes❑ No Adhesive allowed to flash off? N Yes ❑ No Flashing pressed onto substrate to N Yes❑ No Flashing properly lapped onto ®Yes ❑ No promote adhesion? field membrane? Seams cleaned prior to welding? N Yes ❑ No Membrane flow at welds? N Yes❑ No Continuous weld achieved? N Yes❑ No Manufacturer's approved corner 21 Yes❑ No patches installed? Seams probed by technician N Yes❑ No Cut edge sealant installed? ❑Yes N No Termination bars installed? N Yes❑ No Counterflashings installed? ❑ Yes N No Comments: Wall section was base flashed at Lint from A to B and at A from 1 to 2.3. NIGHT TIE-IN/DAMAGE /SITE CLEANUP INSPECTION Night seal installed? N Yes ❑ No Roofing appears watertight? N Yes ❑ No Roof drain flashings completed? ❑Yes N No Damage to property? ❑Yes N No Damage to client's equipment? ❑Yes N No Site broom clean? ❑ Yes N No All debris removed from roof? ❑Yes N No Roof materials and equipment N Yes❑ No appear secured? Comments: The roof appears watertight. Page 3 of 4 PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 6-3-13 DETAIL INSTALLATION (NOTE DRAWINGS USED AS REFERENCE) Detail# Detail Name Construction Summary(Quantity/Description/Comment) 2-A4.1 Membrane Flashing Parapets were flashed per Detail Drawing. SUMMARY OF TODAY'S WORK/ DEVIATIONS/SPECIAL NOTES: Summary Comments: Due to high winds the Roofing Subcontractor elected to clean up previously completed roof areas and install T-patches. Work completed today appeared to conform to project plans and specifications. Unresolved EVOCO Deviation Number(s):0 Special Notes: None today. Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PSI Roof Observer: Sam Stoner CC: Portland, OR—One copy electronically Reviewed By: Doug Roth, RRO Page 4 of 4