HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous Field Test & Inspection Report 2013-6-3 (3) rs Inforntation
rte' .To Build On 1 2 - 2210
Engineering•Consulting•Testing
DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT OF
SINGLE-PLY THERMOPLASTIC ROOFING
Date: 6/3/13
PROJECT INFORMATION
Client: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Store#4178) Work Area:Various Areas
Project Name: Roofing Project Manufacturer: Johns Manville 60 mil reinforced TPO
Location: Springfield, OR Insulation Type: JM Energy 3 Isocyanurate
PSI Report No.: 654137-100-15 Contractor: Central Oregon Roofing
PSI Hours Worked: 12.0 Approximate Contractor Hours Worked: 12.0
SIGNATURES
Sam Stoner Isaac Doug Roth, RRO
PSI Quality Assurance Observer Roofing Contractor Reviewed By:
Representative PSI Project Manager
PROJECT STATUS AT-A-GLANCE
Today's Performance Comment
Construction today? ®Yes ❑ No If No Construction, Inspection Done? ❑Yes ❑ No
Contractor performance issues? ❑Yes ® No
Schedule/scope issues? ❑Yes ® No
DAILY PRODUCTION
Total Square Feet Completed To Date
Previously Today's Total Square Total Square
Roof Section Completed Square Feet Feet Feet in % Complete
Square Feet Completed Completed Section
Main Roof Area 38,544 0 38,544 39,049 98.7
..i":p42 1 I• ' •, i• 38,544 39,049 98.7)
Crew Size—4 Roofers—4
Sheet Metal Workers—0
Page 1 of 4
PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 6-3-13
WEATHER CONDITIONS & EMERGENCY COVER
Z Dry ® Sunny ❑ Cloudy ®Windy [' Rain ❑ Snow Temp Range (low-high) 46°to 76° F
Emergency cover/protection on-site? ZYes❑No Type of Protection -TPO & EPDM membrane
MATERIALS CONTROL& STORAGE
In original identified packaging? ®Yes❑ No Off ground or deck? ® Yes ❑No
Covered and vented? 0 Yes❑ No Roll goods stored on side? ® Yes❑ No
Adhesive storage temperature
❑Yes No Unapproved, damaged, or wet ❑ Yes 0 No
maintained? ® material? If Yes, how disposed?
Comments: Stored material protection appears adequate.
SUBSTRATE PREPARATION
Night tie-in removed? ❑Yes ® No Substrate clean and debris ® Yes❑ No
removed?
Substrate and penetrations ready? ®Yes❑ No Substrate tested for dryness? ® Yes ❑ No
Comments: Substrates that received new roofing components appeared clean and dry.
COVER BOARD APPLICATION (1" ENERGY 3)
Correct Number of fasteners &Rhino Additional fasteners at
Plates?(12 in corners, 9 at perimeter, ❑ Yes❑ No perimeters and corners? El Yes ❑ No
6 in the field)
Fasteners checked by technician? ❑Yes❑ No Short insulation joints ❑ Yes ❑ No
staggered?
All joints staggered between
New/Existing Insulation joints tight? ❑Yes❑ No layers? ❑Yes ❑ No
Gaps filled with spray foam? ❑Yes❑ No Drainage crickets installed per ❑Yes❑ No
plans and specifications? _
Comments: None installed today.
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO)
Membrane allowed to relax prior to ❑Yes❑ No Membrane fully welded to Rhino ❑ Yes❑ No
attachment? Plates?
Membrane/plate welds checked by
technician? ❑Yes❑ No Membrane properly lapped? ❑Yes❑ No
Seams clean prior to welding? ❑Yes❑ No Continuous weld achieved? ❑ Yes❑ No
Page 2 of 4
PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 6-3-13
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) (CONT'D)
Membrane flow at lap welds? ❑Yes❑ No Seams probed by technician ❑Yes ❑ No
Cut edge sealant installed? ❑Yes❑ No T-patches installed? ❑Yes❑ No
Primary field membrane termination ❑Yes❑ No
(T-bar) installed?
Comments: None installed today.
BASE FLASHING APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO)
Substrate clean and prepared? N Yes❑ No Adhesive applied to substrate ® Yes❑ No
and allowed to dry?
Adhesive applied to back of base
flashing? N Yes❑ No Adhesive allowed to flash off? N Yes ❑ No
Flashing pressed onto substrate to N Yes❑ No Flashing properly lapped onto ®Yes ❑ No
promote adhesion? field membrane?
Seams cleaned prior to welding? N Yes ❑ No Membrane flow at welds? N Yes❑ No
Continuous weld achieved? N Yes❑ No
Manufacturer's approved corner 21 Yes❑ No
patches installed?
Seams probed by technician N Yes❑ No Cut edge sealant installed? ❑Yes N No
Termination bars installed? N Yes❑ No Counterflashings installed? ❑ Yes N No
Comments: Wall section was base flashed at Lint from A to B and at A from 1 to 2.3.
NIGHT TIE-IN/DAMAGE /SITE CLEANUP INSPECTION
Night seal installed? N Yes ❑ No Roofing appears watertight? N Yes ❑ No
Roof drain flashings completed? ❑Yes N No Damage to property? ❑Yes N No
Damage to client's equipment? ❑Yes N No Site broom clean? ❑ Yes N No
All debris removed from roof? ❑Yes N No Roof materials and equipment N Yes❑ No
appear secured?
Comments: The roof appears watertight.
Page 3 of 4
PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 6-3-13
DETAIL INSTALLATION (NOTE DRAWINGS USED AS REFERENCE)
Detail# Detail Name Construction Summary(Quantity/Description/Comment)
2-A4.1 Membrane Flashing Parapets were flashed per Detail Drawing.
SUMMARY OF TODAY'S WORK/ DEVIATIONS/SPECIAL NOTES:
Summary Comments: Due to high winds the Roofing Subcontractor elected to clean up previously
completed roof areas and install T-patches. Work completed today appeared to conform to project plans
and specifications.
Unresolved EVOCO Deviation Number(s):0
Special Notes: None today.
Respectfully Submitted,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.
PSI Roof Observer: Sam Stoner
CC: Portland, OR—One copy electronically
Reviewed By: Doug Roth, RRO
Page 4 of 4