Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous Field Test & Inspection Report 2013-5-13 (4) % © ilnfo)71latiol2 •ToBuilclOn 7 -).a7 Engineering• Consulting• Testing DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT OF SINGLE-PLY THERMOPLASTIC ROOFING Date: 5/13/13 PROJECT INFORMATION Client: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Store#4178) Work Area: E.75 to G from 1 to 3.9 Project Name: Roofing Project Manufacturer Johns Manville 60 mil reinforced TPO Location: Springfield, OR Insulation Type: JM Energy 3 Isocyanurate PSI Report No.: 654137-45-01 Contractor: Central Oregon Roofing PSI Hours Worked: 10.0 Approximate Contractor Hours Worked: 10.0 SIGNATURES Sam Stoner Isaac Doug Roth, RRO PSI Quality Assurance Observer Roofing Contractor Reviewed By: Representative PSI Project Manager PROJECT STATUS AT-A-GLANCE Today's Performance Comment Construction today? 0 Yes ❑ No If No Construction, Inspection Done? ❑Yes ❑ No Contractor performance issues? ❑ Yes ® No Schedule/scope issues? ❑ Yes ® No DAILY PRODUCTION Total Square Feet Completed To Date Previously Today's Total Square Total Square Roof Section Completed Square Feet Feet Feet in % Complete Square Feet Completed Completed Section Main Roof Area 0 4,800 4,800 39,049 12.2 4,800 39,049 12.2 Crew Size—6 Roofers—6 Sheet Metal Workers—0 Page 1 of 4 PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 5-13-13 WEATHER CONDITIONS & EMERGENCY COVER ® Dry ® Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Windy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp Range (low-high) 49° to 68° F Emergency cover/protection on-site? ZYes ❑No Type of Protection -TPO & EPDM membrane MATERIALS CONTROL& STORAGE In original identified packaging? Z Yes ❑ No Off ground or deck? 0 Yes ❑ No Covered and vented? ® Yes ❑ No Roll goods stored on side? ® Yes ❑ No Adhesive storage temperature ® Yes ❑ No Unapproved damaged, or wet ❑ Yes 0 N maintained? material? If Yes, how disposed? Comments: Insulation stored on the ground is in original manufacturers wrappers and covered with visqueen. SUBSTRATE PREPARATION Night tie-in removed? ❑ Yes ® No Substrate clean and debris removed? ®Yes ❑ No Substrate and penetrations ready? ® Yes ❑ No Substrate tested for dryness? ® Yes ❑ No Comments: Today was the first day of roof construction. Substrates that received new roof components appeared clean and dry. COVER BOARD APPLICATION (1" ENERGY 3) Correct Number of fasteners & Rhino Plates? (12 in corners, 9 at perimeter, 0 Yes ❑ No Additional fasteners at ® Yes ❑ No 6 in the field) perimeters and corners? Fasteners checked by technician? ® Yes ❑ No Short insulation joints ® Yes ❑ No staggered? New/Existing Insulation joints tight? ® Yes ❑ No All joints staggered between ® Yes ❑ No layers? Gaps filled with spray foam? ® Yes ❑ No Drainage crickets installed per plans and specifications? ® Yes ❑ No Comments: The OMG technical representative was on site and instructed the roofing crew on the RhinoBond system. SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) Membrane allowed to relax prior to ® Yes ❑ No Membrane fully welded to Rhino ®Yes ❑ No attachment? Plates? Membrane/plate welds checked by technician? 0 Yes ❑ No Membrane properly lapped? 0 Yes ❑ No Seams clean prior to welding? 0 Yes ❑ No Continuous weld achieved? ® Yes ❑ No • Page 2 of 4 PSI Project No: 654137 Date: 5-13-13 SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) (CONT'D) Membrane flow at lap welds? 0 Yes ❑ No Seams probed by technician 0 Yes ❑ No Cut edge sealant installed? 0 Yes ❑No T-patches installed? ❑ Yes ® No Primary field membrane termination ®Yes ❑ No (T-bar) installed? Comments: Approximately 4,800 square feet of 60 mil reinforced TPO membrane was placed and welded. BASE FLASHING APPLICATION (60 MIL REINFORCED JOHNS MANVILLE TPO) Substrate clean and prepared? ❑ Yes ❑ No Adhesive applied to substrate ❑ Yes ❑ No and allowed to dry? Adhesive applied to back of base ❑Yes ❑ No Adhesive allowed to flash off? ❑ Yes ❑ No flashing? Flashing pressed onto substrate to ❑ Yes ❑ No Flashing properly lapped onto ❑ Yes ❑ No promote adhesion? field membrane? Seams cleaned prior to welding? ❑ Yes ❑ No Membrane flow at welds? ❑ Yes ❑ No Continuous weld achieved? ❑ Yes ❑ No Manufacturer's approved corner ❑ Yes ❑ No patches installed? Seams probed by technician ❑ Yes ❑ No Cut edge sealant installed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Termination bars installed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Counterflashings installed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: None installed today. NIGHT TIE-IN / DAMAGE/ SITE CLEANUP INSPECTION Night seal installed? ® Yes❑ No Roofing appears watertight? 0 Yes ❑ No Roof drain flashings completed? ❑ Yes ® No Damage to property? ❑ Yes ® No Damage to client's equipment? ❑ Yes ® No Site broom clean? ❑ Yes ® No All debris removed from roof? 0 ® No Roof materials and equipment ® Yes ❑ No appear secured? Comments: A night seal was achieved by lapping the new TPO membrane under the existing EPDM membrane. Page 3 of 4 PSI Project No:654137 - Date: 5-13-13 DETAIL INSTALLATION (NOTE DRAWINGS USED AS REFERENCE) Detail # Detail Name Construction Summary (Quantity/Description/Comment) SUMMARY OF TODAY'S WORK/DEVIATIONS/ SPECIAL NOTES: Summary Comments: Work completed today appeared to conform to project plans and specifications. Unresolved EVOCO Deviation Number(s):0 Special Notes: None today. Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PSI Roof Observer: Sam Stoner CC: Portland, OR—One copy electronically Reviewed By: Doug Roth, RRO Page 4 of 4