Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packet, Pre PLANNER 4/22/2013
• • Planner: "' '1 c2. Date: 4- 22-t3 Pre-Submittal Packet 1 of I o6 pages PRE-SUBMITTAL DISTRIBUTION LIST: Date Distributed: J+-aa-13 ✓ David Bowlsby — Building ✓ Gilbert Gordon/Melissa Fechtel — Fire Michael Liebler — Traffic i/ Matt Stouder— Public Works/Engineering Chris Moorhead, Surveying Planner 94446or The complete Pre-Submittal Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.sprincifield-orqov/weblink8/ • • City of Springfield - Development Services Department SPRINGFIELD 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 TM . 541-725-3753 Phone 1& 541-726-3689 Fax OREGON Pre-Submittal Meeting Case Number Assigned: PRE13-00012 Date Submitted: 04/22/2013 Project Name: Candlewood Suites Hotel-Patel 1703334400100, 17033432 Project Description: Construct an approximate 45,230 sq ft.,5-story,85-unit Candlewood Suites Hotel,with landscaping and parking for 86,with possible expansion area on 2- lots on Franklin Blvd in Glenwood. The house, cottage and shed currently on site will be remove. • Application Type: Pre-Submittal Site Plan Tentative Job Address: 3005 FRANKLIN BLVD Assessor's & Tax Lot#: 17033344 a C.ttir' r> a a '� r nk°'"",Lt,..A ,� 71 r }` ..^,-; 111r Meenn Date ' ''..+' '� a' 114!30/2013 3 +" _''`"9 t`c 4. -gat r � 'a"a�'v 3 "` 1 7`•, Cv F. t,H'n E 'r .d „mss,, d f r-w : ' "°.�., rn 1- 1: dt- .<}.. . Meenn ITime " a'IS :11 UOy n-o 1j"S13 c 1P 1Co m- ,.e z a, «. tg t a d� 5t: g �y �rt � � 'r,�� s F'r ,�, �` � � d d"`a � n°ssi $ , " s� Planner"q '.xia"x-i s+#T s xa ` ,:u �ss?' `tr< � Z t Jam, +..z-a^-t,• —'a ,�S i y, rl zs .. 444 t- :.-, aaac " xs;:`NVO;. ,°t.tlfrgl e v A440 .mod t, °--a! DISCLAIMER:Applications will not be exempt from Development Code or procedural amendments that may occur between the time of the Pre-Submittal Meeting and Submittal of the Application for Development Review. Please contact our office at 541-726-3753 with any questions or concerns. A Planner will be assigned the following business day and will contact you to confirm the meeting date and time. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 C:\myReports/reports//production/Spnngfield/PL_FRM_FRESUB.rpt r - 4/22/2013 • • PreSi ° '1> ittai Meeting Development and Public Works Department Room 616 PRE—SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE13-00012 SITE PLAN TENT PATEL/ALKO INVEST. Assessor's Map: 17-03-33-44 TL 100 PRJ12-00020 Assessor's Map: 17-03-34-33 TL 700 Address: 3005 &3007 Franklin Blvd—GlenwoodfVacant Existing Use: Residential The applicant submitted plans to construct an approximately 45,230 sq. ft., 5-story, 85-unit Candlewood Suites Hotel, with landscaping and parking for 86, with possible expansion area on 2-lots on Franklin Blvd in Glenwood. The house, cottage and shed currently on site will be removed. Meeting Date/Time: Tuesday, April 30,2013 11:00— noon DPW 616 Planner: Andy Limbird The Pre-Submittal complete informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.springfield-or.gov/weblink8/ 'city ofSpringfield • • SPRINGFIELD Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 611111L. * Site Plan Review T FtG Application TYI?e,,, x ;,F `{ (Applicant check one) Plan Review Pre-Submittal: !O Ma'or Site Plan Modification Pre-Submittal: ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: ❑ Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required eProject Information ; ' (Applicant complete this section) A. .Iicant Name:Alpesh Patel Phone:541-544-8440 Com •an :ALKO Investments Email: alpatel9 @gmail.com Address: 1857 Franklin Blvd, Eugene, OR 97403 A. .licant's Re..: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI, Principal phone:541-6864540 Com •an : Schirmer Satre Group Email: rick @schirmersatre.com Address: 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 Pro•ert Owner: Same as Applicant Phone: Com .an : Email: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033344; 17033433 TAX LOT NO S : 100; 700 Pro•ert Address:not addressed Size of Pro•ert :2.28 acres Acres 4 S• uare Feet ❑ Pro•osed Densit : NA Pro•osed Name of Pro-ect: Candlewood Suites Hotel Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro•osal: See attached Existin• Use: TL100: Vacant; TL700: Residential New Im •ervious Surface Covera•e Includin• Bld• . Gross Floor Area :31,336 sf Si • natures: Please si•n and •rint our name and date in the a' •ro•riate box on the next ea•e. Required,Project'Information^ (City ntake Staff,,complete this section) Associated A• •licatiioons: Si•ns: Pre-Sub Case No.: rt1e13-0400(2_ Date: 4-2.2213 Reviewed b : it/ .1_, Case No.: Date: Reviewed b : � f� ply ' A• •lication Fee: $ 2/J IT� Technical Fee: er— Poste•e Fee: TOTAL FEES: $ J` (06 P • 2t..cw U ` TWERE 't'Z1 12--Q ozQ APR 2 2 71 Revised 2/27/12 EMM 1 of 11 spr_map Page 1 of 1 PRE13-00012 Pre Sub Mtg (Site Tent) 1703334400100, 1703343300700 Patel Franklin Blvd Glenwood � G F�A�K�'�N BLVD Y! Topow"..r. !If 404t r PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 http://spifs020/mapguide2009/mapviewerphp/printablepage.php?SESSION=6e7bc3d4-0000-1000... 4/22/2013 0 • 3 • \, ` �- — 1 6i I •ts . \\\ \\, • -. I • ICI C ,..,'-.\-. !- N., ?f cil I) \I .. ) N\‘\‘ \', 1 \ 1 ,tn • i'� \ X11 i a 1 s xa Q �ti v fao � � 25 8 / .•� f °1 ssae I l �� I i ..,...) • A , .41-- --,. .. :, , , V \ .; , ��' �li� ��'`". � ILA 1, t gl 1\41 . ir- il g ram- ,;•;tv- (.1;::1-.._ ii,:i...,-,v) .\ .,, •„;,i ; 0 t ill al �� _ ki �:,, ,--44 , - - 5. 4 Hil 1 I..jg ---, i_. __,,,i m:_ , .. . .a .. '7''''t,-q - .' ''-''' —IP:4 .-_--.4,..tiu‘ , Ng 5 g Ir. 6 6 IIW3 ISW11?•4:: -.,,- --.V.;,- ,-,'"---73. 1. g 1 L.4%.0 /1>a,,____. ,. . Ilk 1 • •,•-.. tilelpgr -------7-----z-__ - - k A,.. ‘. ` b., ,f �% \ o /), � st R cl 'N („. i , _1-'1; . ,-- 1 i8 ,,, :1__________Z - ..0�---- ' g ' . ' le ;/ R I, ', :4•17"-- "7:5-/ , :,_ , C / II ,l rj i ,_.., ..,...1 1 Jrr _1. ,. -1 -0 , 2.01X.'‘G \ 64i'' ..,��,». l ›� X91 ".$.' w I I o! it i is � 'iiiinil Iii; / �.0. il 7 ii 0 4/ 13 !Milli iiii I q' I i,,, i rfi O • April 16, 2013 Candlewood Suites Hotel Site Plan Review Map 17-03-33-44, Lot 100 and Map 17-03-34-33, Lot 700 WRITTEN STATEMENT In accordance with SDC 5.17-100, Site Plan Review, the applicant, Alpesh Patel with ALKO Investments, is requesting that the City of Springfield review this request and determine that the proposal complies with criteria contained in SDC 5.17-125 and that the requested site plan review can be approved. To aid Springfield staff in this endeavor, the following information is provided. The Site and Existing Conditions A. Subject Site The subject site is comprised ; of two tax lots (Map 17-03- °: i ----. 33-44, Lot 100 and Map 17- _ 03-34-33, Lot 700). Lot 700 _ contains two older dwelling units and an outbuilding. ' The oldest of the dwellings is approximately 294 sf in size and dates to 1919. The " newer dwelling, the one closest to Franklin Blvd, is about 3,180 sf and dates * . from 1931. The structures - � are proposed for removal. , Subject Site Image from Google Earth Lot 100 is vacant except for Subject Site august 2012 a temporary use as ODOT construction staging for the adjacent 1-5 Willamette River Bridge project. B. Planning and Zoning 1. Planning. The subject site is in the Glenwood neighborhood of Springfield. The Eugene-Springfield ✓ Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) designates the property as Mixed Use (MU) with a Nodal Development (ND) overlay. For portions of the Glenwood neighborhood, including the subject property, the Metro Plan has been updated with the recently adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan. The Glenwood Refinement m+ Plan Dwolonsions Plan was comprehensive in its scope. With the o co..a,,.,,,,.. ,• Glenwood Refinement Plan, the Metro Plan 'woo l°'" WeVelbowboil designation is as above and the refinement plan "wOMI""""'" oar.�r r�uw designation is Office Mixed Use. -C .. p, H.m Owasimes 2. Zoning. With the adoption of the Glenwood Refinement Plan, zoning for the subject site is the same as -Am.— r;; the refinement plan — Office Mixed Use. Hotels are a permitted use in the Office Mixed Use zone. PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD + EANDSCAPE ARCHI7LC7S + APR 2 2 2013 375 West 4th,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 S C H I R M E R PLANNERS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS Phone:541.686.4540 Fax:541.686.4577 [[ www.schirmersatre.com S A I T R L 0 Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 2 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 It. Site Plan Review—Applicable Criteria Site Plan Review Criteria are found in Section 5.17-125, Site Plan Review-Criteria, of the Springfield Development Code. Applicable sections of the Code are in italics, followed by proposed findings of facts in normal text. 5.17-125 Criteria. The Director shall approve or approve with conditions: a Type Il Site Plan Review application upon determining that approval criteria in Subsections A. through E., below have been satisfied. if conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The applicable refinement plan is the recently adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan. The adoption of the Glenwood Refinement Plan updated the Metro Plan and Refinement Plan designations as well as the zoning for the site. The Metro Plan designation is Mixed Use (MU) with a Nodal Development overlay (ND), the Refinement Plan designation is Office Mixed Use and the zoning is Office Mixed Use. Given that the zoning was applied in concert with the plan designations for the site, zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and the applicable Refinement Plan. Therefore, this criterion is met. B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including, but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: Public and private facilities and services are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the site. The facility, provider and condition applicable to the site are as follows: Wastewater City Staff indicated at a Development Issues Meeting (PRE12-00020) that there is public wastewater service of sufficient capacity , available for the project. Specifically, wastewater service would be provided by .1#4•1°`- connecting to the public system at an existing manhole located just off the southeast corner of - ! the tax lot to the east of the subject site (Map • 17-03-34-33, Lot 500). City Staff indicated that an easement on Tax Lot 500 could be provided to accommodate the connection. (As the City owns Lot 500, staff has indicated that this easement will be granted.) The existing public — — system is shown on the diagram to the right. The proposed wastewater connection is shown on the attached plans. --�•r• Stormwater At the same Development Issues Meeting, city personnel indicated that public stormwater service will be by way of connection to the existing Glenwood Slough which border e PRE-SUBNIIITAl RED Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'h Avenue.Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•F4x(541)6S6-4577' . Candlewood Suites Hote Page 3 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16, 2013 subject site to the south. To satisfy city standards, stormwater collected on site will first be treated on site through the use of a vegetated swale. The size, shape and location of treatment facility are shown on the attached plans. Transportation Streets — The subject site abuts Franklin Blvd, an ODOT facility — McKenzie Highway 126. Franklin Blvd is classified as a Major Arterial, has its full right-of-way and is improved with pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk and street lights along the subject property frontage. Access — Tax lot 100 has a vested right of access to Franklin Blvd by way of an agreement with ODOT (See Attachment 3 — Indenture of Access and Attachment 4 — Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road). This right of access will be utilized in the proposal by locating the access/driveway at the northeast corner of Lot 100, which, in turn, will connect to Lot 700. Secondary access will be provided by way of a future 24-foot wide driveway eastward from the site across Lot 500 connecting to an existing shared access/driveway on Lot 400. The access to Franklin Blvd was granted by ODOT in 2000 ( ). The shared nature of this driveway is commemorated on Lot 400 is based on information provided by the City of Springfield. As the City owns, Lot 500, permission to cross Lot 500 will by commemorated by way of a shared access easement to be granted by the City. Transit — Lane Transit District services Franklin Blvd with stops located nearby the intersection of Franklin Blvd and Glenwood Blvd. (See Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map.) Solid Waste Management Solid waste collection is provided by private firms, whose franchise territory granted by the City of Springfield includes the subject site. Regional disposal sites and the Short Mountain Landfill are operated by Lane County. Water and Electric Service Water and electric service is currently provided to the subject site. Glenwood Water District provides water service to Lot 700. Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides water to Lot 100. (Upon annexation, SUB will provide water service for both lots. SUB provides electric service for both tax lots. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Glenwood Water District provides fire protection for Lot 700, while the City of Springfield provides fire protection for Lot 100. Upon annexation of Lot 700, fire protection will be provided by the city for both tax lots. Ambulance services are provided by the City of Springfield for both tax lots. Police Protection Police protection is currently provided by Lane County for Lot 700 and the City of Springfield for Lot 100. Upon annexation, Springfield will provide police protection for both tax lots. With annexation police protection will be consistent with service provision throughout the city. Springfield Police currently travel along Franklin Blvd to provide service to surrounding areas that are incorporated into the city of Springfield. Infill annexations and development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery. Parks and Recreation The site is included within the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Recently approved Bond Measure 20-199 will provide $20 million in bond funds which will be used to help fund future City park acquisition and development throughout the city, including the Glenwood Refinement Plan's proposed riverfront linear park and urban park blocks. PRE-SUBM ' REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4" Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fa (541)686-4577 Candlewood Suites Hote • Page 4 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Pedestrian access to these facilities will be by way of street-side sidewalks along Franklin Blvd with crosswalk connections at signalized intersections and connecting access to the riverfront multi-use pathway system. Communication Facilities US West Communications and a variety of other telecommunications providers offer communication services throughout the Eugene/Springfield Area. Public Schools - Eugene School District is the k-12 education service provider-in-Glenwood. _ - Given the above regarding public and private facility availability, this criterion is met. C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Response: Applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and how compliance is met with this proposal is as follows. CHAPTER 3—LAND USE DISTRICTS SECTION 3.4-200— GLENWOOD RIVERFRONT MIXED - USE PLAN DISTRICT 3.4-265 Base Zone Development Standards The following base zone development standards are established for the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District. Development Standard Office Mixed-Use Zone Minimum Development Area (1) 5 Acres Minimum Lot/Parcel Size None Minimum Street Frontage (2) None Minimum Lot/Parcel Coverage None Minimum Density(3) 50 du/net acre Built-to Lines/Building Setbacks Subsection 3.4-275H Landscape/Screening Setbacks Subsection 3.4-270F Minimum/Maximum Building Height Subsection 3.4-275D Additional Standards (4) (5) (6) (7) (1) Minimum Development Area. In the Franklin Riverfront, the minimum development area is necessary due to the number of small lots/parcels and the need to establish the local street grid and park blocks. In the McVay Riverfront, the minimum development area is necessary due to the number of small lots/parcels and in order to prevent piecemeal development of a number of large lots/parcels for compliance with Springfield Commercial and Industrial Buildable Lands Inventory, Economic Opportunities Analysis, and Economic Development Objectives and Implementation Strategies findings. EXCEPTIONS: (a) The developer may submit a letter to the Director stating that either abutting prOperty owners are not willing to participate in the assembly of the minimum 5 acre development area; or there are smaller properties that cannot meet the 5 acre standard (for example, on the south side of Franklin Boulevard or on the west side of McVay Highway). (2) While there is no minimum frontage standard, all lots/parcels shall have frontage on a public street unless the proposed development has been approved as part of a Master Plan, Site Plan or land division, and access has been guaranteed via a private driveway with an irrevocable joint use/access easement agreement as specified in Subsection 4.2-120A. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 9 onnn Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-�57t Candlewood Suites Hate Page 5 of 15 Site Plan review-Written Statement April 16,2013 (3) The density standard applies to high-density residential housing in those Subareas where this type of housing is required or permitted. See Subsections 3.4-245B.1.a. and 3.4-245B.2.b. There is no maximum density. (4) Where an easement is larger than the required setback standard, no building or above grade structure, except a fence, may be built upon or over that easement. (5) When additional right-of-way is required, whether by City Engineering standards, the Metro Plan (including the TransPlan), or the City's Conceptual Street Plan, setbacks are based on future right-of-way locations. Right-of-way shall be dedicated prior to the issuance of any building permit that proposes parking spaces. • (6) Architectural extensions inciuding but hot limited to: cornices; eave overhangs; and porches and balconies extending beyond an exterior wall of a building may protrude into any 5-foot or larger setback area or build-to line by not more than 2 feet. Response: Minimum Development Area (1): The 5-acre minimum development area standard cannot be met due to the existing condition of numerous small lots along the south side of Franklin Blvd. Per the permitted EXCEPTION above in SDC 3.4-265(1)(a) the applicant hereby submits this "Letter" requesting the exception be granted. Minimum Street Frontage(2): Both lots of the subject site have street frontage. Minimum Density(3): As this request does not include a residential component, this standard does not apply. Build-to/Building Setbacks: Refer to findings in Subsection 3.4-275 below. Landscape/Screening Setbacks: Refer to Subsection 3.4-270 below. Minimum/Maximum Building height: Refer to Subsection 3.4-275 below. Additional Standards (4)(5)(6)(7): (4): There are no easements larger than the required building setback. (5): Additional Right-of-Way is not required. (6): There are no building extensions which protrude into a building setback. (7): There is no footnote (7) in the code. Given the above, this standard, 3.4-265, is met. 3.4-270 Public and Private Development Standards A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks. 1. Public Streets, alleys and sidewalks in the Glenwood Riverfront shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter and designed and constructed as specified' in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. The following is an overview of the Glenwood Riverfront street network: a. Franklin Riverfront Arterial Street. Franklin Boulevard shall be designed and constructed as a hybrid multi-way boulevard. Response: The applicable street'is Franklin Blvd, a state highway and major arterial. It is fully developed to standards. It is in compliance with the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter, the Springfield Engineering Design Standa is apd� ocedurRECtD RE-SUBMITTAL Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 6 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Manual and the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies as specified in Appendix 3. Appendix 3 describes the corridor for Franklin Blvd abutting the subject property as: B.1.c....The corridor design envelope for the hybrid multi-way boulevard provides for alignment flexibility during final design to...provide design flexibility to minimize right-of-way impacts. B.1.c.2. Jenkins Drive to Glenwood Boulevard: The Corridor Envelope will narrow to approximately 110 feet west of the Glenwood Boulevard intersection, tapering to meet the facility cross-section within the 1-5 right-of-way. This section of the facility is planned as a modern urban arterial. As the subject site essentially abuts the 1-5 right-of-way to the west, the Franklin Blvd corridor at the subject property will be as the right-of-way is today. B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. Street trees, especially those that provide shade, and curbside planter strips in the public right-of-way shall be as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Therefore, street trees will not be subject to the regulations of this Section and will not be counted toward any landscaping required by this Section. As a general rule, street trees shall be selected on the basis of providing shade and have a size relationship with the street landscape (e.g., the wider the street, the larger the trees). Trees at least 40 feet tall at maturity are required for pedestrian areas. Design considerations shall be focused on space requirements of the selected trees at all phases of their life cycle. Scale, soils, underground obstruction, overhead constraints, branch height, mature tree size, and shadow patterns are examples of design considerations. Proposed tree species shall provide continuity between one site and the next in the same block. Street trees shall be placed either directly in planter strips or within tree wells located between the sidewalk and the curb as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Street trees and planter strips in the public right-of-way shall be shown on the required Site Plan. Response: The subject street, Franklin Blvd, is fully developed along the subject site frontage, including a curb-side sidewalk. Thus there are no planter strips and trees will be provided behind the sidewalk, outside of the right-of-way and on private property along the site's street frontage. Appendix 3 does not contain any street tree specifications. The Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual states: A. Street Trees: Design plans for projects requiring street trees shall show the street tree locations in a • shaded format on the street lighting plan to ensure street tree locations do not conflict with street lights. Trees shall be at least 20 feet from decorative post top mounted streetlights, and 30 feet from cobra head streetlights. All locations will need to take into consideration Section I — DESIGN STANDARDS 6 - 2 EDSP Adopted December 03, 2012 the presence of overhead power when choosing street trees. Street trees shall not be planted in planter strips less than 4 feet wide. If the planter strip is less than 4 feet, tree placement shall be on the property side of the sidewalk. Tree wells set in concrete or sidewalk areas shall be a minimum of 4 foot x 4 foot. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D ft PP 9. 9, 7013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 Candlewood Suites Hot • Page 7 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16.2013 Street trees shall be planted at 30 foot intervals except where the planting interferes with traffic vision, street lighting, traffic signage, or public utilities, or as approved by the Street Supervisor, City Operations Division. When planting large canopy trees, tree spacing may be modified if approved by the City. See Appendix 6A — Approved Street Tree List for the approved street tree species. Response: There are no planter strips or tree wells. With the number of existing utility poles, cabling, overhead lines, signage, lighting, and vision clearance needs opportunities for street trees are limited. The proposal includes a cluster of three street trees as shown on the attached plan set. The-specified trees are included on the city's adopted street tree list. C. Lighting. 1. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. Decorative public street lighting and pedestrian level lighting, as may be permitted in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, shall be included with all new developments or redevelopment. 2. Private on-site lighting shall comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America recommended practices and shalt a. Be the minimum illumination necessary for a given application, including parking areas, as specified in Subsection 3.4-270G.9.d.; b. Be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property; and directed downward and away from abutting properties, public rights-of-way, and riparian zones, wetlands and other protected areas identified in this Code; c. Create a safe and secure environment for pedestrians and bicyclists during hours of darkness and reduce or prevent light pollution by minimizing glare; and d. Provide private on-site pedestrian level lighting, whether free standing or attached to a building. Private onOsite pedestrian level lighting is distinct from public street lights described in Subsection 3.4-270C.1. because it is intended to light private property rather than public streets. The height of a freestanding or attached light fixture shall be 12-14 feet and in no case shall exceed 25 feet or the height of the permitted building or structure, whichever is less. In this case, height is measured as the vertical distance between the paved surface or finished grade and the bottom of the light fixture. Response: Public street lighting is existing. Private on-site lighting is as shown on the attached plan set. F. Private Property Landscape Standards. 3. General Landscaping Standards. a. Minimum Standards. The landscaping standards for the Glenwood Riverfront shall be minimums; higher standards can be substituted, provided all fence, wall or vegetation height limitations specified in this Section are met. Crime prevention should be considered when exceeding the landscaping standards because the height and density of vegetation may become a safety and/or visibility issue. b. Protection of Existing Vegetation. Existing vegetation may be used to meet the landscape standards if relocated on-site and/or protected and maintained during the construction phase of the development as specified in Subsections 3.4-270F.5. and 6. Any necessary free felling shall comply with Section 5.19-100. c. Selection of Materials. Landscape materials shall be selected and sited to produce a hardy and drought-resistant landscape arePn8atg�ti ITtAt iR feo IICCCC A op 0 9 0(11C13�� LI Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Faki541)686=457 , Candlewood Suites Hote • Page 8 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16, 2013 consideration of the soil type and depth; the amount of maintenance required; spacing; exposure to the sun and wind; the slope and contours of the site; and compatibility with existing native vegetation preserved on the site. Shrubs resembling trees shall not be used to meet the tree standards. d. Plant Diversity. i. Shrubs. If there are more than 25 required shrubs, no more than 75 percent of them shall be of one species. ii. Trees. If there are more than 8 required trees, no more than 40 percent of them shall be of one species. If there are more than 24 required trees, no - • more than 25 percent of them can be of one species. This standard dces not • apply to existing trees that are counted towards meeting the total number of trees required. a Specific Tree Standards. i. In any required landscape area, trees shall be suitable for this region as may be approved during the land use review process. At the time of planting, deciduous trees shall be a minimum 2 inches in caliper and permitted conifer trees shall be fully branched, between 4-6 feet in height. Spacing and time of coverage of trees shall be as specified in Subsection 3.4-27OF.4. ii. The categories of trees are defined as follows: (a) Large trees in the public right-of-way or on private property are those trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity; (b) Medium-sized trees on private property are those trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall and 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity; and (c) Small or narrow-stature trees on private property are those trees less than 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity. f. Specific Shrub and Ground Cover Standards. L All of the landscaped area that is not planted with trees and shrubs shall be planted in ground cover plants, which may include grasses. Mulch (as a ground cover) shall be confined to areas underneath plants and shall not be a substitute for ground cover plants. ii. All shrubs shall be of sufficient size and number to meet the required height and coverage standards of this Subsection within 4 years of planting, unless otherwise specified in Subsection F.4. Shrubs shall be at least the one-gallon container size at planting. Ground cover plants other than grasses or sod shall be: (a) At least the 4 inch pot size; (b) Planted in triangular spacing at distances appropriate for the plant species; and (c) Planted at a density that will cover the entire area within 3 years, unless otherwise specified in this Section. iv. Any plants listed on the Nuisance Plants List as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design and Procedures Manual shall be prohibited from being planted in the Glenwood Riverfront. g. Installation. h. Maintenance. i. Irrigation. The intent of this standard is to ensure that plants will survive the critical establishment period when they are most vulnerable due to lack of watering. All landscaped areas shall provide an irrigation system as follows: i. A permanent built-in irrigation system with an automatic controller; Response: Minimum Standards: Proposed landscaping meets the minimum sta dRW oteA L REC'D D APR 2 2 2013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-454QLFax(541)686 74577 . , .:r •. Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 9 of 15 Site Plan review-Written Statement April 16, 2013 Protection of Existing: Existing vegetation on the subject site consists of older, little- maintained residential landscape material, including trees, shrubs and lawn. This existing landscape material will not be retained as part of the project. An exception is the area in the southern portion of the site that is within the wetland/riparian area and its setback. Except for where the proposed stormwater treatment swale is, existing landscape conditions will not be disturbed. Selection of Materials: Proposed landscape materials are those often utilized for urban landscapes in the southern Willamette Valley and are well suited for-the-weather, rainfall, sun and wind typically experienced. Plant Diversity: There are more than 25 required shrubs and no more than 75 percent will be of one species. Specific Tree Standards: Selected tree species are suitable for the local environment and urban conditions. Deciduous trees are specified at 2 inches caliper. Evergreen trees will be between 4 and 6 feet in height. Specific Shrub and Ground Cover Standards: All shrubs and ground covers are at least 1 gallon in size. Shrubs will meet their minimum height and coverage within 4 years and ground cover will cover its area within 3 years. Mulch is limited to area underneath plants and is not a substitute for ground cover. Installation and Maintenance: Installation and maintenance shall be as specified in the Code. Irrigation: A permanent, in-ground automatic irrigation system will be provided. G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards. 1. Vehicle/bicycle parking standards shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and the Housing and Economic Development Chapters. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Vehicle/Bicycle Parking Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. 3. Vehicle/bicycle parking and loading standards shall be designed and constructed as • specified in this Subsection. 4. Vehicle Parking-General. Adequate vehicle parking shall be provided to support new development and redevelopment in the Glenwood Riverfront, while minimizing adverse visual, environmental, and financial impacts on the public. In line with the land use vision for compact development and a walkable, pedestrian-friendly environment, on-street parking, aboveground and underground off-street parking structures, and parking located within or under buildings shall be encouraged. Locating and designing all required vehicle parking to minimize the visibility of parked cars to pedestrians from street frontages and light and noise impacts of parking lots strengthens the character of the Glenwood Riverfront, reinforces the emphasis on pedestrian, bike, and transit for travel, and minimizes the potential for vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. 6. Maximum off-street vehicle parking spaces by use category shall be as specified in Table 3.4-1. 9. Vehicle Parking Design Standards. The following standards shall apply to all permitted parking facilities: a. In both public and private parking facilities, the stall width and length and aisle width standards specified in Section 4.6-115 shall apply. b. All surface parking lots shall incorporate the following ele ryents including, but not limited to: PRE-SUBMI 7 I II'1L REC'D APR 2 2 7Ofl Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4°'Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 • • Candlewood Suites Note Page 10 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 i. Pedestrian walkways that provide priority over vehicles routes, are direct and accessible, and enhance safety for pedestrians and vehicles. Parking lots with 50 or more spaces shall be divided into separate areas by landscaping or protected raised pedestrian walkways at least 10 feet in width, or by a building or group of buildings. Pedestrian walkways shall include pedestrian-scaled lighting as specified in Subsection 3.4-270G.9.d. and elevated crosswalks and/or distinguishing paving colors, textures or materials, as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The pedestrian routes shall lead to an entrance in the - rear or, if applicable, the side of a building; ii. The use of alternative surfacing as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, including permeable surfacing , where applicable, shall be preferred as an option over traditional impervious surfacing; and • iii. Strategies to reduce "heat island"effects, such as canopy shade trees and landscaping as specified in Subsection 3.4-270F.4.c. c. Surface Parking Lot landscaping Standards. Parking lot landscaping shall be required as specified in Subsections 3.4-270F.4.b. and c. d. Surface parking lot lighting shall be provided as specified in Subsection 3.4- 270C.2. and may be a mix of bollards at ground level and pedestrian-level lighting. a Vehicle parking shall not be allowed within any required or optional building setback specified in Subsection 3.4-2751-1. 11. Vehicle Parking Access and Driveways. a. In Subareas A, B, and C, vehicle access to a parking lot or parking structure shall be from a service street, alley, or, where there is no service street, other local street in order to minimize the impact of auto parking and driveways on the public pedestrian environment. Each block face fronting a service street, alley or other local street necessary for vehicle access shall be limited to one curb cut. c. Curb cuts for all parking lots or parking structures shall be constructed to maintain the elevation, appearance and continuity of sidewalks crossed by the curb cuts. 13. Bicycle Parking. Safe and convenient bicycle parking shall be provided for residents, visitors, employees and patrons. In mixed-use developments, the required bicycle parking for each use shall be provided. Required off-street bicycle parking spaces shall be as specified in Table 3.4-2. The required minimum number of parking spaces for each listed use is 4 spaces. Response: All parking is provided off-street, in a landscaped and screened lot behind the building. Thus parking is screened from adjacent uses as well as the public realm of Franklin Blvd. Per table 3.4-1, the maximum parking requirement is 95 spaces (one space for each bedroom (85) plus one space for each employee on the largest shift (10)). 86 spaces have been provided, including 4 accessible spaces in compliance with ADA. Parking stall dimensipns meet the requirements of 4.6-115. Pedestrian walkways are as shown on the attached plan set. Lighting is as shown on the attached plan set. Parking does not encroach into any setbacks. Bicycle parking is provided near the main entrance to the hotel. 5 are required and 5 are provided. H. Wastewater Facilities and Services. 2. Private Wastewater Facilities... for any proposed new or expanded use the developer shall provide for a suitable connection to the public wastewater system... Response: The proposal includes a connection to the existing public system as shown on the attached plan set. " IId1D ('t Schirmer Satre Group•375 West i"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-•54+' . (5• •65•-11577° APR 2 2 2013 Candlewood Suites Hat • Page 11 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 L Stormwater Facilities and Services. All new development, redevelopment and associated infrastructure in the Glenwood Riverfront shall manage stormwater runoff on- site to provide for water quality treatment and groundwater recharge, to the maximum extent practicable. Response: On-site stormwater will be directed to a new on-Osite stormwater treatment facility as shown on the attached plan set. Given the above, this standard, 3.4-270, is met: - - 3.4-275 Building Design Standards The following standards are established for the Glenwood Riverfront portion of the Willamette Greenway(WG) Overlay District: C. Building Facades. The design of buildings and their relationships to the public realm are critical factors in the development of an active and vital pedestrian environment. In all Subareas building facades shall have the following architectural detailing: 1. The ground floor of a building shall utilize all of the following: a. Incorporate awnings, canopies, porticos, or arcades; b. Provide variation in building materials including, but not limited to: tile, brick, split-faced concrete block, concrete horizontal siding, masonry veneer, and powder coated aluminum or traditional wood storefronts that are differentiated by, trim, paint, and ornamentation; c. Utilize ground floor windows and entrances that provide a high level of transparency by allowing views both inward and outward;and d. Utilize signs;or other features, including public art. 2. The upper stories shall utilize all of the following, as applicable: a. Include architectural detailing utilizing some of the same design elements specified in Subsection 3.4-275C.1.; b. Incorporate a change in the window style; c. Integrate a change in floor height; building step backs, as specified in Subsection 3.4-275D.4.; or a combination of these elements; and/or d. Provide differences in height and architectural elements including, but not limited to: parapets, cornices and other details that may be used to create interesting and varied rooflines. In addition, building corners may incorporate taller elements including, but not limited to: towers, turrets, and bays. 3. More than one type of building material may be used for building identity. 4. Building facades that do not front a street, alley or mid-block connector shall be constructed with design elements similar to those facades fronting streets. Response: As shown on the attached plan set, the ground floor of the building incorporates awnings, variety in building finish texture and color, and contains a number of windows. The upper floors follow this same theme, with variations in finishes„ articulation and ample windows. • D. Height. The following standards are intended to: allow for a range of building heights within a development area; support an interesting skyline and the ability to market view properties; and reduce impacts of shading from tall structures on the public realm. Lower structures combined with taller structures within a single development area will be permitted to allow for a variety of design solutions. 1. In all Subareas, the minimum building height shall be 2 stories above grade. 2. In all Subareas, there shall be no maximum building height. 4. In Subareas A, B and C, step backs that are a minimum of 151feet wide shall be required beginning at the fourth story of a building and after each additional 3 stories. nr Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 41h Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-1;40;W r(541)6E614577° - APR 2 2 2013 • Candlewood Suites Hotel— • Page 12 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Uses for the lower roofs may include, but not be limited to balconies and observation decks. 5. In all Subareas, non-residential ground floor space (commercial/office/light manufacturing businesses) shall have a minimum floor to floor height of 15 feet to accommodate space for mechanical systems. Response: The proposed building is greater than 2 stories. The height limit is not an issue. In lieu of step backs beginning with the fourth floor, the hotel utilizes an L-shape configuration combined with facade articulation to achieve the same effect. As the proposed hotel is not - .. within the commercial, office or light manufacturing use category, the.:e15-foot first floor height requirement does not apply. E. Massing/Building Articulation. Where buildings are highly visible from public areas, massing shall be addressed by articulating the facades with insets and projections to create visual interest and enhance views from the adjacent public realm. Response: The proposed building includes articulation on all sides, including projections, repeated window patterns, variations in roof lines and changes in building finishes. F. Windows and Doors. 1. Ground floor windows and doors that face a public street, alley or mid-block connector. The following standards apply to primary entrances to buildings: c. In Subarea C, commercial and office windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 60 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of a building's first floor facades to allow views into lobbies, merchandise and work areas and allow persons inside to look out. 2. Upper story windows that face a public street, alley or mid-block connector. In all Subareas, upper story windows shall be required on all building facades and shall comprise a minimum of 25 percent of the length of the building's façade for each story. 3. In all Subareas, the use of low-reflective glass shall be encouraged as an energy conservation method. 4. In all Subareas, frosted glass, spandrel windows, and other types of glass or film coatings between 3 feet above the sidewalk grade to 8 feet above the building slab that diminish transparency on the ground floor shall be prohibited. Response: The proposed use is not in the commercial or office use category and thus the minimum percent of length and wall area does not apply. Upper story windows facing Franklin Blvd comprise 25 percent of the building length, low-reflective glass is encouraged and frosted or other film coatings are not proposed. G. Orientation/Entrances. 1. In all Subareas: a. Primary entrances to all new buildings located on a street, alley or mid-block connector shall be designed to include at least 3 of the following design elements: an awning, canopy, overhang, or arch above the entrance;recesses or projections in the building facade surrounding the entrance; a peaked roof or raised parapet structures over the door; or display windows surrounding the entrance. Primary entrance design elements attached to buildings shall be: i. At least 9 feet above the sidewalk or grade; it Suspended from the building(i.e. not supported by posts or columns that may interfere with pedestrian traffic); PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 •. Candlewood Suites Hotel— • Page 13 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Response: The pr4oject's primary entrance does not face a street, alley or mid-block connector. Nonetheless, it does include an overhang above the main entrance, suspended from the building and is a minimum of 9 feet above the sidewalk. H. Build-to Lines and Building Setbacks. 2. Building Setbacks. a. In Subareas A, B, C, and the portion of D north of the Union Pacific railroad trestle and within the nodal development area, buildings may be setback a maximum of 10 feet behind the build-to-line. This standard will still allow the establishment of a pleasant and diverse experience by providing additional pedestrian amenities. Pedestrian amenities shall be addressed as specified in Subsections 3.4-2751.2.a. and b. Response: The proposed hotel is setback 10 feet from the build-to line. 1. Pedestrian Amenities. 2. Pedestrian Amenities Standards. The pedestrian standards are minimums.The developer is encouraged to provide additional pedestrian amenities. a. Where there is no building setback, the following coordinated pedestrian amenities shall be provided on each block or development area, as applicable, located between the curb and the build-to-line: i. At least one bench for every 80 feet of street frontage; ii. At least one trash receptacle for every 80 feet of street frontage; and iii. At least one pedestrian-scale wall mounted light meeting the standards specified in Subsection 3.4-270C.2.for every 50 feet of street frontage. b. Where there is a building setback, in addition to the pedestrian amenities specified in Subsection 3.4-2751.2.a., two additional pedestrian amenities from the list specified in Subsection3.4-275 1.2.c., shall be provided for each 80 feet of street frontage. c. Additional pedestrian amenities include, but are not limited to: i. Sitting space (e.g., outdoor seating areas for restaurants, benches, garden wall or ledges between the building entrances and sidewalk); ii. Building canopy, awning, pergola, or similar weather protection (minimum projection of 4 feet over a sidewalk or other pedestrian space); iii. Transit shelters; iv. Information kiosks; v. Sidewalk displays; vi. Drinking fountains; vii.Wayfinding signage for pedestrians consisting of a distinctive logo and • directional guidance to neighborhood destinations; viii. Planting beds, hanging flower baskets, large semi-permanent potted plants, and/or ornamental planters; ix. Pedestrian-scale lighting either free standing or attached to the face of the building as specified in Subsection 3.4-270C.2. for every 50 feet of street frontage; x. Decorative pavement patterns and tree grates; xi. Decorative clocks; xii. Public art sculpture, statues, murals, or fountains; xiii. Bicycle racks; xiv. Stands selling flowers, food or drink, as may be permitted by the Springfield Municipal Code; and xv. Entry steps, porches and front gardens for residential mixed-use buildings. 3. The 80 foot spacing standard in Subsection 3.4027512.a., above may be flexed,land pedestrian amenities may be grouped or placed closer than '' ZJ�3 thisd rt�8� p n�aRECt® Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(554411T6688O--4S Candlewood Suites Hate • Page 14 of 15 Site Plan review-Written Statement April 16,2013 the quantity of amenities meets the minimum requirements and the spacing averages 80 feet along the street frontage. Response: The proposed building is setback. Thus pedestrian amenities are provided. These include: Wall mounted lighting and plant beds. J. Screening Roof-Top Mechanical Equipment. Visual impacts of mechanical equipment shall be located and/or screened so they are not visible from adjacent public and private streets or adjacent residentially zoned property. Acceptable screening includes:raising the•parapet on all sides of the building to be as high as the highest mechanical unit or vent on the roof, or a secondary roof screening system designed to be as high as the highest mechanical unit or vent on the roof. Secondary roof screening systems shall be enclosed groups of units rather than a box around each unit, incorporated into the design • of the building, and constructed with materials that are compatible with those of the building. Mechanical equipment also shall be sited and shielded to protect adjacent uses from noise impacts. Response: Roof-top equipment will be screened from view with raised parapets located on all sides of the building. 3.4-280- Willamette Green way Standards The subject site is outside of the Willamette greenway and this criterion does not apply. D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been located and designed to promote vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian safety. Vehicle access is at the northeast corner of Lot 100 and does double-duty in providing access from the right-of-way to both tax lots. Thus only one access/driveway to the Franklin Blvd corridor. Pedestrian safety is ensured with the provision of a side3walk from the site access/driveway to the hotel entrance, bicycle parking location and parking area. Connections to transit stops are provided with the existing street- side sidewalk along Franklin Blvd. Driveways on the arterial are further minimized with the provision of secondary access through the shared access driveway to the east across Lot 500. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQL-W Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Response: The subject site is in an urban environment, with over 100 years of settlement and human disturbance. Physical features are limited to the southern portion of the site which contains a WQLW facility-the North Channel of the Glenwood Slough. As shown on the enclosed attachments (Attachments 10 and 11), the slough is a pjurisdiictional wetland/riparian corridor and includes a 50-foot setback. The enclosed plan set rnq the presence of the resource and the setback. PR APR 2 2 2013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 Candlewood Suites HoteT • Page 15 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16, 2013 Ill. Attachments A. Attachments The following attachments are provided to assist staff in evaluating the application: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2—Warranty Deed - 1950 Attachment 3— Indenture of Access— 1962 Attachment 4—Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road — 1962 Attachment 5—Application and Permit for Access—2000 • Attachment 6—Special Warranty Deed -2007 Attachment 7— Preliminary Title Report-2007 Attachment 8—Stormwater Management System Scope of Work Attachment 9—Stormwater Management Report Attachment 10 —Wetland Delineation and DSL Letter of Concurrence Attachment 11 —Wetland and Wetland Buffer Diagram IV. Conclusion Based on the information contained in this written statement, the applicant believes that the requested Site Plan Review can be approved. If there are any questions regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to contact Rick Satre, AICP, at Schirmer Satre Group, 541-686-4540 or rick(@schirmersatre.com. • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 • j,luewyoeuy _ Mati..Oft...K a 6uud � r�M.oia..a1arna. £OtL6 a0'PI !1 S `^, mg .,d: o''NW �.ri �.:a: 'P/�Ia ulllueJA SHE '..'., � •0.o,.....`..... . ia;oH sawnS poomeipue3 E °°'".."1.ma.""" U9t 999 Itieae a7WIlitin• W dE >(}IIJI'Jln rata uD w19n3 ICC WS'at MIN SLS A..... IQ U W re, o c --1 N O 9� C*4 Ca m X = d CI- E CJ's a W . :i Z Ce w w E J - at; 6 1 OW!- � 1 ' IS4Wb5 1 fa co�® .2- 4 _ S iis_. „..,_a , W Z —J` O ----ri \A Franklin Blvd 8 i',.4. ‘ \10 ...--'n,,,--7.-.) J - ;C7 1 & 15 uAI J9- '� ? iS pJO�uo) = C nN 3 - any_Iddisslsslyl 7... 8 1 riFi! Wic3 LI any uosiapu i. ;— �44—, Henderson Ave o 11_ 1� g < 1 11 < iI I it _. w m. W / i P^I9 pooMUaI9 %% a . ns Rd '--."d a PaJaf"a1:� N 4 Q rda3 " _-J h0141414inin L -- iS eim6ny w ; b w 1S malivanra r- w td iii Thy o II �- 15 Putts � 1 sa, 4geffigna ' ocal 1•;` .fit S , lS PUO.A IP O \----.. F � L � Oc -ci!0 716 o ,r Lei - PA Z a--� a 8 ! �-._:- ��'� _ ti. 7 11 1 1.! z �_ ,I so I[_ -� ��a • - • Attachment 2' • tr , WARRANTY DEED ;n ‘12§4-.11:8, .....‘c,' 43-; t'. .. '4-Imps IntantatVitttnt6gtt(L That...ye,...JYlea.Braea.Ahd..Audrn..1147011 4.a1aA..11AftXp...gA._._...... ':?;. .._...'....._Mani T...Sans...WOW/dad.H0l4.. _..... .. ... . .... .....graotod!...,for the considerationof "d: .:;. the sum at.....oua.mdAO/loo ($1..00.)..end.other.selu►b1a..eomidatntion..o.r......a..,DOLLARS 7.. t% to..._._yn... ...................paid ha we bargained and sold and by them eremite do....bwgdo,sell and convey .',,q. : I�.`. unto the STATE OF OREGON,by and through its MATE HIGHWAY COMMiSSlON,the following described`- ` r.1 • ib.. premium,to wit: A parcel of lad lying in the Zara Sweet D. L. 0. 9 68, also in the Southeast , , F.�* quarter (s$) of Station 33, Township 17 South. Range 3 West, H. H., lane County, , Oregon, the said parcel being dosarebed as follows, Ilk" • Beginning at a paint on the Westerly line of that tract at land conwspad to the .., i7..,' State of Oregon by and through its State Highway Coomtaaton, by that deed recorded in gook 234 raga 292 of Lams County Deed Records; earl point being opposite end 170.5 feet distant Southerly from (when measured at right angina ta) the onnt•r line of.the I. ... Peeifio IBghway at Shrgineor'a Station 195483.5, said point also being 560.9 feet South .`, and 1291.5 feet West of the Wortheant earner of the Zara Sweat D. L. C. 9 68; thrreo 1. • South 72° 11i 300 West 379.69 feet to the existing highway right of W line; tbanoo • along said right of way line Worth 1$0 581 30° West 45 feet; and Korth 12°DJ 30" ((!!..� ,. East 380 feet; thence South 15° 34' 30n Boot along the Westerly line of said State I" . property, 45 feet to the point of beginning. t•• ' .1`( y.: Rim parcel of land to *Loh this inscription agile" contnina 0,39 acre. ) 1}.. ' Ae ao essential part of this tiansaotion, we, the underelgaed, as the owners ' ( IF..: in fee simple of the tract of land abatting m the Pacific Highway, as described . ' in those certain deeds wherein James Hayes and Audrey E. gales vero grentoos, re- corded in Volume 124, Page 168, Voltrse 128, Pogo 593, Volume 129, Page 594, Volnas 1i'. 137, Page 334, and Veliao 340, Sego 69, Dead Retards of Lane County, Oregon, of • vhioh the real property cowered by this decd is e part, do for ourselves, ow heirs I ' mid assigns, M 1, transfer, corny and relinquish to Lho State of Oregon, by and �1 through Ito State Rigaway Co atenim, its sucaessore and aeeiCns, forever, all r. emamnt of amass and all rights of ingrate, egress and regrant', to fat and botwen the real property deaortbsd in said rocorded deed and the above designated highway. r E[Clirf, there is reserved the right of settees from said abutting land to said ' ).', highway of a width not to exceed 25 feet on the South side thereof oppoette Highway !.. Rgineerae Station 1994861 acid aaees to be for ordinary trawl to end frau the abutting land only me shall t be used in connection with any cot meta institution 41.c abutting activity established or conducted on the adjoining property, uhinh, in alp manner, -Ij asters to, invitee, solicits from or is dependent upon the users of•sail highway. Grantee, State of Oregon, shell have the right at its option to build at any a s.t. future tine at its Sole coat, m outer highway within the right of way. Van eon- otruotion of such outer highwayr all right of nooses to and from the highway, it any be herein epeoittoinlly reserved, than cease, but grantors, their heirs end assigns, shall have nooses to the outer highway. Said outer higlvey shall be ooaneoted to the a main highway only at such point or points no the no the State of Oregon nay deelgastas•' , • It io expressly intended that thew; covenants, hardens and restrictions shall . run with the land rend shall forever bind the grantors, their heirs and assigns. • 1 • PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 • s•_ iddit 41£3 11415At 1 .,._... ; TO HAVE MD TO HOl a lho sold premises with their appurtenances,in he slap).,unto the said dint!,of Oregon,by and through W Maio Highway Commission,Its aurctlnon sod assign forever. II • • And V!....the said grantor ?do...heeeby revenant to mid wills the said Slab a Oregon,by and n I louts successors and nadns,that...—JIC.drd.._...._,.. the awnor._e < thmopls ha Mato FIIg:,woY Comm u I g in Im dmple of mid preen:Mu that they see Iroe I;em all inmmla anees - _ .. .. I•) is mil that. W . ..._ ..will warrant and dalend the some farm nil lawful dams whatsoever. IN gWITNIMWIIKIIEOF.• • Ys .. ....hemhenvniu n .a4T.. ..bond.A.end shat. 3! • • dd. R r .day.d w—_.... ale...}'9 11.ne la lwrnwr ref: t 1 >/ ,,,.,�/ 1 • �cJ (MAL) ( / ..[SEAL) 1. • U d • if' STATE OT ultECO$l. .__lµ •• le Oss„lya Ixdel.A._. f (� On lilts �'/ daY ad 9—r'-+c`✓y. ,In$O,personally came beforenw, o It t 7.PwWte_ (, .- .. m and for said rowdy sod ante,Iho within named Joss* Hayes . Sul MOW.4WD*, 1ap.,Ydmga_FE WF?y..EfhEEYus . • In for ps•nrnallr known tot*the hMiltral pcmmf described la,sail*ha meanies'.the wtlhhi lidrumril. . and who earls two alb e4YmWedgrd In son that they mire reed them=treaty end mhohr4o for the uses ` and ptrllmw'baits warr,ett •• C\ it Witness my timid and nfOaal mu)the iko•and year hat tam terlltta I .) 1-. I 4 IA :: ,. gg 1• •j a g 1,...tl it!Ill' da'it asr^. ¢ i Sa SSpp • 9 ) e Y$.r sal �d 9 Y) I i i a i9 lid i. PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 . • • • • Cti wean en SALt r ill:: and its State _- _- ,i THIS INDEWASS:M1TSB98@i9,Set th*Ott12 ® G�GOY, b7 through - - r' - meow Ooadseion,'for the oomidentien of the ewe of One and 00/100 (M1.DD) '' ;11;_. • : Dollar and other valuable consideration to it paid, Ms bargained and mad slid f. e by these prostate does bargain, sell sod convey unto Jaw' Own and Mean L. ' ';“ Saes, husband and wife, the following doerrlbed prsalea, to vita - a gamed of lend lying in fora Sweet D. L. 0. i 69 also in the ...1 Southeast quarter (SW or dootisa 33, Toiaahip 17 douth. IWg9 3 Wet, .: W. W., Tone fount', Oregon, the said parcel being dsseribed as follows; �d•�" se' et a point on the Westerly lies of that trot of land . 8'. oo ve d to the State of Oregon, by and through its State ee e- S lasing by that deed molded in Book 294 Page 292 of Lane Deed ', y;. ' Records; said point being oppoglte and 170.S teat distant Sather free (rhea sseasred at right eagles he) the caster line of the Pacific Midway at '■Station 195783.31 laid point also being 503.e Lest South:2111;1.3 feat WS. of the gortheast earn or the Sara ••` suet D. L. 0. 1140; thenav Borth 169 30' that slamg said Westerly .. 3 property Use 20.9 fast to an sale arming the Bootbvest corner of said #%e property's theme South 720 501 Bast alaag the Southwy line of said tai _.. { : property 220.6 feet/ thence South 160 30' Wet slang the 34,2•47 line 7. of said property 155.15 feet/ thence South 726 11' )06 Wet 153.3 feet 4 to the point of beginning. . r.. The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 0.39 sae. +i' Provided, however, there is saospted and reserved to the grantor, ` and waived and relinqutabsd W the grantee, all rights of aeon* het,e.n ,;, the shave described real property and the right of my of the public highway abutting *nth*lortherly side thereof, tab polio bleary '• for the pmyoesa of identification is designated as the Paoi to ffighwy, `. • being State Biglws lo. 1. This rmserratien and araptdon shall run with the land end shall not be subieat to modification, anoellatiaa or destruotion by adverse usage or estoppel 90 setter how long °mttrwM. is Nothing in this conveyance contained shall be construed as oonvayieg any F estate, right ••ti.tle or interest in and to the polio highs y right of ' • way nor sry rice's or raveraion therein or thereto. i • This 000weyasoe is made, executed, and delivered upon the grounds and for the reason that the real property hereinabove deocribad is no 1 •• loopy needed, required, or willful for hlghwcy purWesa. _. i i r • PRE..SUBMITt RECD APR 2 2 13 • • • t., , , I ;u ' ? t'f V e "'{!t` }�J`tv iiP' ryVr,'r•.Def'1'44$.•L ! 1 1', , ii:' 1:-.`,="''... ' ' 3F:iiit aid t o�lhb` .t! teliatr, sal• r I,- . le if s . a t1oaLL0111vL,,.Lase oaONd�tba NA at Its�sits Wroe`iYl�iwsd libd t r r ,R 'e presents to be.l.ewtM'ah ttiis flux• .// dgr_it ' $` I ` -- - .r't}'t `etl . user 3,l'7, . ''‘,..7,l 71(f r Q " J1 V . .se�r,i,e���s• Attrats 'i, 8saretw7 °° � ill an ilLa G�.'.. _. .' CaWUa ` + rat' �SY: : ST= @'Ci 8J017 :(‘14. County otf t s Cn this // day of 14 vs 1950, berets re appeared. . �;_ Dan A, 07rbding Chas. H. Myselllldddd6666 end A99&... e. NcIier to no yernonally'mown. .< who .Soh being Scat sworn. did sa p that b. the tats Doe A.Oregon. sad is said u Chat raon of the State 8lahvay Che tscion of the State of Oregon. and thit ha,, . ,, d-' the mid Chas. 8,the Snoles and he the said N. K. tiffs, is Stet.:iiiti ' r";'. Coamleolouer of the Stara of Ore>ml that the esti affixed to edd:dssttiwmt :'..'` id the 'reel of the Stets 83abvey Comdaion, end Mt the said lnst§hNbt-is ':. oiptd and salad leYbeif of asid State by said Coardiaion, and that the said .'�. js Cairene and the said Ooom issionars a*movl1eeddaa�a said instrument to be the ire. !?; sot and deed of add Otats, tt mid State iaghw'Canlaaion. :; ,?: IN TKSTIMAIT Z12110Oy I have horeunte at ip heM and stfleed ' ottiold '' osal t e day and year last eters ,mitten. . ),1:', ' , '.n rase r 1� ,.,., Notary Pe o for 0leaon. Y• F(, eomdedon expires, (4.4 .1C.'t'/4d/ . ' . t r / .. t r ■Vr ,. 6 vi 1 Cf f :1 j jh; fy. fit,. " t „ . 1 ,x PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D . tPP99901'1 Attachment '3' .. ., .~._ .�..._ rr.w... ra i . \:ems r i \i f•. JNNIatr' w . il, - i ' iY°Y\ * 66"/'78• .+-. . _ Tits W . .,sus.. YI r• t p •• ' 91tID.LDO■ISSlIRE, eddy aM enwted ahL I•'.•0 'dy•at;•` JC '. .' 1• �i :. • 1962,'by and boluses the STATE CT iasaae, by*id'hrough:ite'g1.t. Agh,is.• _ t, .L "C®Ledon,'herdufte wiled IS to, and JAMES Kalif and:iwiUTIAties$ ";'' hnbmod end wits hsreia.tto sailed •Omar•.! ••• " . .• (• L. a. . • • MIlieEAfl, abate'acquired from Jine.Cayes and Audrey/Ceps; imeba+d and r -' wife:by warranty deed .nested on June 29, 1950, reoerded•in Volume•41i, 1 1-;;;;;'4,17.,...:-',:;:-,7:7" Page.189 of the Deed Renard. of Lane County, certain property lying-in the sathawerly garter of Section 33, Tewnebly 17 Boubh, Baoge$wnt,M.N., Lana County, Oregon; a co ant .c • I•: ' •4• wNtlCD1a, said deed reserved to the grantors'soone to the NaisnIL'Hig)..' w'.A`" y\ My M. Nile Poet 0.391 Engineers. Station 19d, on the southerly Aldo the - .:.1■t• of, for ordinary trowel to and from the abutting lands of,the pintas only; .1 d, end • 4 Wand, State, by resolution on the 71st day of July, 195*resolution o entered in.tats roads as Throughway*and Right. of Moose Revolution Nee , ^....r....-....... .' • ta, provided that in °origin Instance. restrictions upon use of moan points •7 d .••'i'; ,'' ` could he remand aid w0luiLed uuse could thereafter be aado of the wan i points; and vet wf898Aat Reaolution.;p further provided.that the Mar. should py in ed. ,•A van a b e to State the estimated eaount.of the cb oowro ao toting snob oolen- + ties and deceleration lone as are needed for the safety of the trawling pun- l"t 1'•:: • r , 'wlfEte, said-Resolution Al provided further that State could, at.ay i`M1 . . tees, sonetruet or ah•Mn provide a frontage road Or roads within the bound. r > • arum of any pr*..nt or hereafter acquired right a way, whereupon an right. / {5 • 1 •. i 7... , ....: .. • • • �.-: • i• e \ 4a t e .i � 1 rl..r'I I '' • '1 a D i • • • ^4 ... tr 1 f J' , .._Y: L.- .ui uI YTe.. •Z ... . .-: �t-:i:. ' r - b 4'&: .n -r5r S='-c. e.4: .- v.. .tea- : "Ya . :. --.vas" . . - •,� i. may::. of op+; teed bib of thr hooey(to the main traveled war would oases I 1V ty l",1..:`:.',—.: Sib the rousts wool/have JellaitsdU.Looses to the frontage,road or o-},. It .roe ej and .. + } : °'•i x! ,11094;t ie i .4ne o thea.Hnoee whoa ieaolution 11g 4a app.ia 7 1; l' . 3 v rand tjee•use reetrlotim m'the aan,,FoL\tsn be converted to on war)- 1 \ i .d oaabi e ii x•41 i t mi teennd$e RCion lahni,and • , 1 ., .. of e .autoaton .aeloM rr b011ILA3, the•Anare hail tpueeted that the use reetriot;laas on,their • ! • 'polnt of ocean opposite highway Engineer's Station 199+06 be rowed and v Wf the rldth of said the inogeseM from TS feet'to 4$ feet, and they y ` �• ...,n„n.+n.. bare paidto and depooltpd,with,State the sun of $9,196.00, which is the ✓ .�. y'. ;: estimated east of constructing the aoosleration and,deceleration lane. y which are Mnnery for the safety of the traveling public whom the use of ' -.•acid nesse point Se converted to an uemeastrietad or e,\limi6ed use. _•r NOM, tI1sOtaeB, f0 eoasldarttten of 13,196.00 and other pennants here— • (I, "Y;;;...',,,;-...;..;.4'..•'G' '. in stained State does hereby sell, !reneger, convoy end treat unto Amor., - .,,C.',.'-:-,,.. 1'r• their hairs end eatpa, ea0otenH of softest and right, of Upon, *Erse. -Y t'.: r rye • .and regnia to, iron and HWesn the right at tow of the las:omaie lilgMy + 14, - and the Amen. Land abutting on the ,motherly side of Sold highway of • - r width of 45 foot opposite highway Ayineer'e Station 199.86, eM uereotrioted 1:, S ti}, 7,-;•1.7.,-....2....•;,,..), . es to use, FRGCW RQ/Bbtll s the • point berate scatted S. eublsob Ae - a"..tbectight, of the net) to ooutruot • frontage read it rasdv, as eat forth :,. . • Sa Mnlidion la heretofore mentioned, and in ouch event, the misses to the .; MoKansie highway shell, own, but the Owner., their heir* or assign*, shall , ' it" Nis aaaW to E'be•fewmtsp:rasd or erode, unrestricted as Eetasa.,....,.;, I. Seept a. herein modified, the deed of June 29, 1950, resins in fu11 force and effeot and the Loose herein granted shall be',abiatt to the rights of the Stall to build•fronton road or road.whereupon all direct ° I �.:.......• r . __ _ . .. ...."_•.�. . __ c x k w \ I ;;;;•;;r: 14 i ,i a . . 1 i ' I i ..1 I \ (r :.\ 11.' \ t APR 2 2 2013 " . e • • , . ,•;.7.17;;17.==;..•.:-..... ..: ;....:-..7.-47.•-•:..,-•..'„,-•..7-771":".,•7:-1". ... 1.".=.7,r..7.7:7=-77Lf.-.....,:...:•:.`....`,-,-..----.:-J..:fl-4777.7.7::::-.7.7.7. ;---...-..:.,-,1:-..• ,_.....,.....,...... ..”-_ , ••, ,_ •__:_ •••2..+••:•"-:-••”._ it-rn- ----•••• -••••••-r•-r•-•.-•-•-.t••••••-•••"tt-tz:•7•7-"nthwrn•tr.",•••-riv-r-,.-....-i-.,,ner•rx.".ron•-.....tr..- I..':`.:trrr.r.,t.:=Zt114'.4ar...?,•••:-.7):177_•!_tnr:-.-:-.1...tr-z.un-7--,:nn-r.".••••:"....1--c-:7.7-..:7..eTZI:?..7r.n":"Cr7 "-.L•-.,...•:.-ITTCCI.7.-1.77_ , -t -..1.-,.....-. -..-..4..f..1,-.L., -,‘--,:-.-.!•-•,:...A.t.•-•ina4,-.“.,-.--..--- --i.-:-..---i-r..n,-4....-z-•:.(cm.-;!,no....;:...c..-”4i4..-r■•-....m.i.r.---... ,,......e.....--.`4.-rr:- ,4ye:a;..;:LL:'2L -.;7..,ILi :,VEL4,-.......iir• •.-3/4.,..;;L;;;47:-L-LILL/.*L.-4,--. oiza;r:i::■-;• ......-“::.;- -4- ..iirt--;.-ieza:‘,. .”,-iti.. . .4:rF4.C. ... T;;;; :4427 :.....C7 .1.; ...*:Lt.'L•L..:1". 3.:...: L t- " -: • •:',.* ••. f.•••••.:.•••-:•'.;•yz•' p •• - ,- .:. ':::''.,'::•..", ....I. •: .......':: t-. ...! ..: ,* ,..',.• :.c/..: :: .• ••.. .. ... ,e: ... .•--1-%frig..pe,' ' • • .-: .-• ci it- 11 • '. •••. :„....,..—,..., *■),...):•..,;;;;; ,C.,:l. ul''' •• .• -;........F..v.:.i...7 .11.;-...,.:7.. •i : Buti.07.-coasoat.:c.: : 4:1:7.;., ..,...., fiplit ..-...:2. •-•.......• ..•....-: .... ..:..::f..::- . /. .,..,_..-...i..5F.:,..:,.... . i ...::.......-. . .-. ....- ::) . ; . , . . . . . ;7.3',";;..:-./1,,;;;;;.y.'.....t.,..• • • •e,..: : .0,... . 194, hero. re eliepieXed 7,'{C.r.:7:; :-.n."..;:.;i :,:::. . •• .. • . ,. . .. --,t,sfe - .. . ......- ..--:. .. -.. • •-. • aid ay et he,-the said• • Citml Le "'CPO, • ' ••••• ' '9 lir biritziih. ii':. -2 • 4 •h: • LL“. L.L . 4 L,L,Li.,.,L.:X.',..1.',...:..:::J.•/ L tolli Nita-Fitting*Ocalallosloo of the ititi-..a.onsoil;-.44 Asi he, thliald'-' - ',..?* • -'01'";:i'-'''. ,k• '‘'. .:;y:"2.:.11'''.';.‘;',Fr. • • - • • • .• • - ' . _ .. . . ;,,,.“.,„1.,,.;.„.......,.,. • • . • ia Mate hiiinny Comilsaioner ST the hate of.Ortzeithai the ant affixed •to • • -., :•:;/;.;,,.. ',. .■.‘,..."'24 '.•L,L r. ' . .' paid Vietnam:eat1e the aeal,af the Stati.hietvay Va.:;j:".;;;;',',....j7;11,;:filf..: '• • loatrameat ie signed aod sealed la behalf at add Stets b1 said Coseitliaa, and SC.,•::"..,..'•?",-;''!.-..."c"• that tbs.sa.1.4,0balraaa az&the said temiaelenerssealmouladde tad lattaiman ",...1 fr..•'''.A:,:',:— -,4-A-7-------a-----•• ,.. to Is the Ins sit aad dead of said State,:to said State 111.1tvay Chassisataas '.••• • --wra. , sri.IL-10,10.". .. 'ti Ttlif21132Cf imurcr, 1 tura: inmate eat ioe bath anti ' tial.A .":. a.LT LILLC;C L L''''•'L • .....‘,5• ..LL....1.2•.;.,•.... official seal the 4a7 aad.pair last'abon'arittoo. • : ..)P.'ste ' S ', ' ' CZ • . ' ' .t•.-;Lt.:.•. .......:.r..:-..:- . • ' *Sr ''\ - • ••:.-11. ...,.;:',••• 1:11P;;"1.••;-'1, ':1-... - . -• . . -- ' t.S. . ... t.;.-:.;`17•.'r' '!'nyi,";.■•.:.?•-k.,77, ,,..:T. • •.,„ • -./', .•'a'seri„ • • -:-.1' .• ...C..Th.el%.. L• •'ft . I . L• 'Lilo cr-Oregen 'CL.:-NSIM y• • .J...4......-....2. • .-• • My beasionialeasciteat .. .,..St.•rite. V.' I , 1-'-..-•-• • L .4. .L:L?..":L..'t•rj. ‘11-;L:,-.; ..••■Lo . arni or ?Al . . ne.o.mon . :- -.”-,.-,•,- : , . } I. • . -;t:.,t.;.i:..::,...:.,•/:;:,• County of LAK • • . • • Yi.'t&q.7•:',1;‘.r•'-'' ' ' 011 this I{_ day af WOK I 1962p persually cape • . 1 . . baron web • notary Falk. In arid for nit eouoty god state, the within morosi ' . Jamei'HAVGS sod AUDREY L. HMI • ' • •i huabaad and wife, to no pareonslif known to ba 3' idea • persona dose .., • c...} •• - •,••••,..-_"'„,'•". ;.......1',...i.",V.....I.T 44, • • Lod vb.essoitsd the vi thio thatrusoott alai who each poremalkr at .• l'13.M(,. ..;•-a-' I '•' tt.r..:... •, • . . . .'to so that they*aavauted.the ea firstly and voluitarily few the cues and •te.'.); ..kw.e.,„•• -- ..‘Lc•.-.--...rt., „,..,....„..-....,..,.., • • - .1,-- :• ■ w.:',1‘. .R.,:;•*: i'-i tomin .aed ..;:;;7 ,0.40% -j• -:.-:-,.,-::::- Within es yanit ad'official seal the•day aad year lilt .- t.V .." •- ' '•: - ---..i.'" . - . •. . . t- it t:Lii.. ‘.20 LI: '' L L '••!.! '."--. .. . • 1 diter •.••••• Vei TVI A :4 4\4 . ... •••• r; .•.7... . i.;........7::........::'■T... • •.• . . . • It.; • f 1.. •lae..Ar. " • .. ..••• •... • . 'Start /9 io for ■ •• J . .... .t., . _ ej emmipsis!miaow. ANUAIIT 4 •,..m,:w... , ..C.: •.., • ' ' • • . •A; LLLL-.LL 'LLLL"C. 71,:.“-.Y.L.,...2.-}..7.”;:%4T.L. • • - 1:-.L...:.,L.L. .-....- • • I f • •1".1f; 'L::;. ' . • • L L• L 1 • . . • L. L 1 t .$;.',LL`L.' . L• . .. • . •'• . • • .. L .. . • • ' • .. . I. , . .. . . . . r,‘.2.'L:L.I.L.LL.LL:Li.';',;•1" . • L.L.• .. • . • •L'C'''L;L('./.•L.:L L'Ll. IL rox __.....„...r...,........._ ..___._________*___._.__:71::'-.•''- '';''."- ' t :".' ;I: .•'''''''' ••••'s •• • . . •..- . • . ' • * - 1 I.•11.':-.,' -. ••• . . . -. .- . . .. • " .:::"..X : :::01i'l• • ' • • - (.-:" . .. .':„.:.;:,;.:-!..'s.:‘'■':`,':f-:1 IN • :• v: '. ."' ':" '. %''I -• f' ....'"..7 3 '1. . L..1L,c.,; , ‘.• . • . L• Li.• ';...!: !!...?.. 1 ' ::;:i....4'..•:::::.k:'.' .1.......C.., 3,..:' ..7.2 ':.' •. 1 • p..... ,..:.... ,.....“,.- ...r.:.1....c. •-• 4 4. 4.4. -*--4; :-.-.::. ;44-,.. -...-•:."t•••:•"-•!••• :•••••6. •."?f••4114.Jftv3•••.:f'•'•: 'r.-,•-it's•A''''Irt."'snif"7.1ain•". -7"."--r""•' ' .: :' . - ...1.0..: . .:: 7'1,h': 1. • ... •':i.-,' ... .1.- '...• -;..- .-.:... •,f;•;!,"I t'...C7:=.•••-•.•.- .•4.,-",....-.4,. ..f.:4.14:. .. ...... .. .,- ..L. • '....-:LI• 1i.4,.;LL•'Cr.'sr.:C;.......'i. 4.14;L ,.1'26211,1 t:C...'1 !;;LL':.LL.... r. ' ••• L4.4.:"; ,. - ''' t. ie L•:1;' l' ..;:e.. '..ACeT''. ::41- .':.-......i...:. ..,..... -:. .•.. .'.. .. ):. ,.: .... . -..........-,.r• t..,...........:... i-..,....:.,........... ............‘_-..2.. .,------------- ------------- ....._:...::....r.,,....4.....:......,.......„.. .......... ..._-_—_— ___......,.,. ..„,....„.. __ .........,..— . .. ,.„...._........--_—.... -.-'.'.,:c.... .--.,-.....:•ci.:::.-.:2---..-.--.-:,::>-....:.,-.-.!...,.....2:-..--- - --.-..- :7-- -r T. -- - - - '—.-• "- .• .- - - --- • -....7-, ' PRE-SUBMITTAL REC i . APR 9 2 7 n13 . . • • -,•.,...:-.7.7:-`74.-tTX.•••.4".,'47,...-...,..-.:-.7:727 ;-•'.4-.7t•-:=•-•:-.7":;-1•17•2;•-•-tj---:-..=:27-7r:V=••••,-77.:.•-717. .4•••••.•171"------::::2•-r.r:A=.•'.....,•.:2.....:...7-Th. . .:,."..-..•:..r..r...n.7,•••r n......t.--.2;-:r.t.,,,. ...r_t"..--:•:-.••.•-::e.-t-.:.-.-vz.7-,-2r••■•:41..;77:7,1z.-.c.....,:-..,•,•7•.-1-•r.-.•:-,..•-..7.4."±:+71-.n.l''''".'"",f-a.'•"2.);.:7:,-,..--••-•••-•••••••••,- - ..-_-..-.4 ..o......44L41.At.tiet.1/44-..int-r.....--a-11--.f14,7,3-.........,..• et.,-..r.:;;;,.-,;•••••.:."-,.:-,,,,,,..-...,,,,.:',-e;•;,:,,,.1,,,......,,. ..,,.0.5- , -,,,,,-,,i,.., ... -.................... ....-, ., . ' • . . . . ,.• f • :.......-,.......... ,,•..,,,7 •.•.., • :listing to/tbit•asliviasvati.Japollsal awe;ouvl St all„thrtaINFT7P.19441,-,,:4 1.....:-••-.-,ri 1,5'..-.::17.,....,,,-.7 .-.A.g.'•'....-•1'....f•-iitt . :,---...:_r-,;•.•;•,•••::.; • - 4" .. lawn!imipsW; 0iiie' tro.laviegii•ii14e0g.. ;•4!,......,1 '■6,'Ne',.; % .',4.71:,....,.:,:,......,../. v......:“`.-.0,:t'-:•.:•.',::fl ' , • • .. ,o. •. ...-"...6'.4.'''.'''''''.•..'.'" .' : .. tile.,7 i 74.i.tarot.103nt.wribillni' -- :;,-:::;.----::::::;.-...‘•:-:--“: . - '' .•'•.:-..• i 4'- -4L'a..7'%,... '.•• - ‘... . ...;t..;-;,,.a r ....Y. .1..? •- .. . . ... •,•-.1.y.;••i•;;;r•••q•-•.*.f,;'• •• . . ' ' . ...• 12(dr•'1.1.-•:.•• - • ••, •••• •-• • t n eq ,7.) .V•11 ..•‘t-1 11:••••••'•••••••-7. 2 i'vr...,..-.'- . . . ...".. -i 'Aa •P4 i.-. . . . .:41,„ ,, , - . . .. . - ,..,..... :.1/4v.vg-Fiwei 0... t...v, ....... .. ,. . , HI .0 .A / ./.. . - . .•. . . . . . . • ..• .•- • „•,•,...;...,::,‘,.,.....:,... . • . Ocodasionst . 110111=thare . ' • *rani.; z . -.– —. --e•-•- -, , , ■Sold(e) • . . - . • • . ~1.4.....trttl. ''':'`,.C.:"..1,..;•••;10., . ' • . "L.:j• .. COP ..!'.'''.:"'.'"757' . . . . ' 'IV:::'''''',..,1'•.,.',''',' . • . • I .•..';",:.,••' tT • L . . '::.C.2....:',.P.',.r.I e.4.1'-X': • P 1:....?;•,..:.-...." '•••••••:;.•••••1.'• ..,•".'..• • ' . 1 ,:, .•..r..,7,•,':'"'"1 •^:•••.••:•.'"•:":”.-•,,•-,-/ • • . . . • . . ... . :7,':.■:::....4.•.-2c.T.,\,.:;;;;;\ . • - .. r n.ii,ri,'.;V.-14;j.;.i:.1t. • • . , . . . . . ... .. ... '-';'..”:-•••2:1 •;.-..".‘.7:: ••. . . . .., . . . . . . . .-.•:;•-••";V r•;;;•••.?-1'1"itr;"- . . . .-,-..7.•-•••-•'..,:•••••...... • • ... . . . • ••.1.,',-.52',•. !•'•'•.••:', . . ' ' ' • • • 1 ..• ....).:1;.•'. i: . '.....',•,!:,;.....::::.•;:..,-.,.1..' • • • : . . • • . 737'•••..•:•.':•.:•,•••.,;,7,-;:, .- . . . ...._...... • . . • .. .%..).•••••.?•:••;'.....•,:,...', . . • . .. JNIliekr -0••• . - ''..J.'1'.I:', ,'.7.'".;.•.;•- .... 3/1/62 . . . . . ' . • • . ... ... -. ' . .. -.;•,;•4•••-•--;',--‘"..- '•.' . . : •:•..' 7,.:..:::„.2',.. • • • , . . .• . - , ' . . . .. . . . . . . . . ",•••••;!.''''..?74./..';:9 - •• r •'' '"' .,.,,,,:..1,.•,...“,2..: ,..e.y.-'•.-•••,1.;..,•••'.V .....: . .','• . : , • ' . •• ".: I ...... .'..',I.:.'..'-i....:..11,..r".‘.....;.- ;.••••• -:,..',':,t,7:N.,.../..., •,. , :.,l'::::::.„■'.:'.',..:'::: :.,' . . . .. . • It:....•:"S7 t t'''..11 K.:.:..;.........s..:.:.....h.A..-,Z,.. .....,:...C.::t.::;......(..;;.•5;:.... ,•aikt.+Ua.:64: 1:nesa.b:t;C:...,, - :■:•-•:::•' .'.11 '.•,'•'.. ., " '. :0 ...v"......'Y\.'.: .• .If'1 '....:.-.;:.` :.1:".. ..' /1 .1Z ...: . " .1....::.:Zt.f...'0"'..:7.e':e f...il.4.0 ZA 0 4:'7%C'-.1.1e..• gt.tAc ,' -■• ,.,- r•-•.: ......II:-..1 1.... 7 e! 1: c ::1.... •to :''',4•41,!c:••• '' 4 :•••"'7•7.1. ::•!ta.......i im, ..A:,74. '; ..2 •1.0...j. :•,11-1:.:..&...... II /3 if;.•:. t1/24.• irt I :,, '; ...• ':;•.F.',,•.: ;1.. :,•:.••••: :,',•:,•'.'t•••:.,...'.1;i•,..':ili .•,-. 4• : !•.;..‘:',1 :;:.. ...,;:;.:'.t:A..:......'; ;. ••:,;"; ?•%:. ••;111 J."f e'..;lq.,'•::;:;-.I.,''. .1 2 .•',.:t.4...•i'........‘!.; ,,,...,...,•.;4..2'. • .. .. -..:tr,.7.2...,.c:ii,ry. . .•.1:„.,,.',i,....i..: 7....ii,•.,,..t..t...:•K,,,,,i';;;;!;:nt tqt C, •,;;i:•;‘,..:,.. .., •.• . .-'• =rt..---:.‘- ••••:--'-•-:•••••=r-tv"7:---77":••••••::C•-j-f---%'..;.=----.:i.-- -.7---7-rt.--.....7...--n.-r-'-'-----.7---€.1.-.. er'7"----;‘,-..-r-:-:".77-7.---"V•r":.-='7'rr.-7, . '11 EIMEME PRE-SlIBMITIAL R APR 2 2 2013 31 • t , ♦ Y • ,t ('t 4, {f '.t Jtra ,'IA`L) \ rI .4 ,Il Y r/f r\;T i c,:f I , / .) ? 1. t(,t l ?„..•,:z 1 1 �., 1 ty t , �> a 1 J_s'N{r1t 7+ _ r t 1 r•e rr L a ry t t t u -». 'cc,} rF/iL J •)rhl Tr AS raA i f L 4Y ttesk+it ;Jf • sl I v r)�M Cv J i rl J ,rJ tti Iv " Ir ', f, -+ — r. 4.:#ati. i J � J r t J 7 ✓1 1p 7 { 4 1 1 r 1 5t t ( T Y t r r. 1 ,111 f�7 i1 (iH.4 yLltill ti 2 1 y rJl t tt cl l ) yJ 1 i {: Y 1 ,\ r 'Y I C IWJ tJ ?.' la t ww Jxtt + It t 1 11 1 ti. 1IL SI �l. �r 1';� r4 s� I 1 t r , r ,S tt x. ti•2� V 1 1 S i .1 fN .5I t8 r h 11 t TY S 4'( {� Vr I 'a t}Y' 412 04. ', a �a.if.< x std r Y\ t'` I 411-• t �' rr i p • f 14 h t 4J 41A� 1 4 ♦ �Y 1� IJ f e J� cta r / h ,� z � F . r hit s1[ i nt p , s ,911 � t r 1 't t)r G I J. ;.} ++.k) tt,w ti 1 t rl•a.t 4 !t L J 1 •wJ wrk • Cill /,li ..t a fit ilrcr ° fi a,:';‘..,:,,,Q.^..."-,•4 + ' n• p h/S'J .,4_ z".0",":(1"'$-‘,xn r 1U Ir•1 t4 x1 c s t1'� ! h t xi llJ r[ ", 1 `�-, �` I A 11�} . I1,t+4 r'°�1 • 1.. ✓,I 1 U 1 e, ) t'•tr•I ti pier Jx 4t [ tf vm•'' 4c r .Su18" r Yt a1, “ .J>= tl >I'_v.)f it tlt ty J 1 rV y.r•.r�n'l r ;F N9 6)Jatf- !! )3 J ✓4 lv 1. t 7 14•4• .4,i•tr vi4 (lll•fir 3! Ax .Yai r4*ir_(f} 5 tp ' AFJ• y L S jJlrt is t, A s',ra r9i t ' Jt 1.Jr7 It r 1rtJrr7b, . . 1 f . '. r J f n 1 { E iNvI 7 11^ U lift i t . 7 vl ill t .: .-;:‘;;;::"1.;;;;::::21 ....a : rP{ It+�'trkt t4`4?- F 0 s yy L� 'n {11•s:Z : fa (l�la�`r�Sifaierflry K Vitt a I •• "1 • u 6 r �-51a .n SAf[x. a " .uJi > +W +: w tt.SC 'n m `.1ir.9.rr.ft t r 771.. n"',v n x t t r ilYr )r L.-�vt.y;ta' 141/21 (V .I" .' �. 5 ,�I Pt.G+I\/{f+era Ht y}Jlllli' _ L :2,..--,:;•.;•.....,.•:•,•;••.;r t 1 4 •'i+ ^Zl ! i r44' f!'y^'llf ' 1 r 3 p� Ft 4 143 �i1{tkl �" `'�V 17 t7� R "'_�T'+ w17w�) 4�f'r t } Ed Jt f<! .a 'yw,.. N Alt 1p{ LJ Y`' t S°T Rrx.a'v l 1 • 41'. •fv't r 1 E S . �4ro �0 � I 4 1Fr �}{M1 J)jy+i rk! } ^t ^ , 1 t Y•)1r; ({ 1 ;3ilIV, , s, °' r v ,. t :, )+ t , J t^•1 > L+. Rr'/r,>r, ,ar, 'r ,•x ',' S4 ?AJ�'•l91{Irte3{t1 STS•a2ii a t S+/k h,,, Nt[7i`'LIsi J(J 1,,,A,1!}P$: kyv tvrro L! 1•7 rJ ) �JJ.•,. At17 yy'g5J J c y�{� Sf, r r J 1 t{ r{ t ) t LIT' 41:V-.1 .p1.'(aT J yr�`yryyi....•E rpN1`liri�ti.FK ri .t' - i114t+`�r ''! • L&;Jt r I;Alf} cit,, n r([ ^. t . ( , tF,1r:44ii li. 41.).: l::;: .P'.c}O.:.. fHc`VASl,' :2i tyr•�tl/1/LACtt.} r �l?:f14 g tt.7%A tie"`r :411.1:,.r1pJ, lC L� :(711::::.l r0 Z'WV, yitiiC in.',aRSSr4 §.1.('�t��tibk tt( .tiAti ,j, a1Mt Yi:Ate0U j J i't� )1,1.. GL•�1 ill > , °t S W'1•t(t ':1S�JT I4% P+rdCpStNx w}f414 4 �.�1' 41' SA l< 5:1(71:{PS p/1.1 tM a(J 1 +4kF , y k I' t;t. "rII 1 1 S� <IrA .E 1bl f !^.R e(tt{x {t) 1 r Wl Al L t. r j Sf >..'. 1 t \.s f'4I2,55,(S•? 'i,S r f�l :1:1�r t �.�' N.1,t �rC IKt( vif+k�4x}x.l 1 K nl 7 (r r t S ,,}/s� 1 s \T 7 ` T`4yt 914 lVl r c dn. J (,4 n f t }t a i 'C %x3.011 1? �,1q4 .gpra�4r a h il h�-b:J �`gfi rt) •I.11 Y�'p"71 Jr�`'+�'�ulp t,�r\11 CYa111 \`l�`_�! r ile �sl Jn7 !� 44.6�,l 4,' )IS�rf5rd `Yj+Si".Y r 24-P � ai.r 6!':'$t/i of �'iVtJ ti ySSx?( 1 JH. r t tt B!41' .Sy�n' ti•`JyVirtt,{r ".',4 raw �t.I.vo doe.ek' rIC"Ldi�e .r 7 r L .hiAkriyle ep .Ps ra T`Y ++t •,a4 ' 3011'.. to w rt t + t,i• �H ai J 4.ss' 0srf-alt 1 ..f It, Wes') 14 r r t 4 SVf 1 •f. {L f -f n1 e4id tt .c (t .S G �Stir`(11 h .( Irt i1 ru1 IFr.IU5;;::-;;%J �� t�f'l.t� 7 l irk 3�:',,-..w,1/24‘,1 tr1� i�,+vt s Sai"1?Ja> ..+:fkP 1(,jy IvS r.f, t 1'x �1 ` i I. ,, '. '1 41 �11'!r a� t.ii lta ryy 4L� 1iJ h:la•J %.1y,y. 'ex )I N,SJE 44.K lr J r r1 h i 4 T) T'E!1' r 4S'rr 1 t ' rat'' Jy z{.ryr• 1' �r'gF r r11}A. s i J t i ' tca: i t +JI Tet l'4 t J,Jir �t f?,,e-Nei l+ r-p J. i'i t ,, + J I d I L, r + `I �• }1�4 t} r fidtttiri'I'i h rAgiecti �t P ,•u rroV 1/J VJ,gi �" J T h- P t. �� trr s ..^>. il. Y cc �• 1LJ�t� t1p.u1 il,7 i:. ' .1 t� �'u/eFt t,t` F J ..F Cttyra341 z'fI> t1�x Kf�ci KT�J zsVa �� rr T�4<Ik ♦w1 itl4 ftY \Yrffl 1tYi rrl. Ld S7 `'1J 1 a rI dkt� x, +5y,i2k 4 r 4We A A,4. 7t Jt7`,ti M1 P44f J ziN.v.1110 1 J <L Las p, J+a .i k ✓ ,..,,v2z,F v 7 r'. YL It'l t-m {1 Sti -, s ,N.. • • r' {1:,574' 1�"'�aAb }?/N ?ye ,� tYti4le N )ts^' r. 3A,�•t.J07f.cii.4.2I }:yw! {'' F91'B r 4.4.0' t'r y �a F'J 5;y t.h..rt �t �ti4 Jgt•S� Y ti��61L1)I a r+`�5 � 5ih' 4J` r'``( fart���f�} h.hS r yr 7 4 Ir\ IN. 4 a lJ,1{, yS}'J 1 ,,,03,1 i N.? 1.` .rq `J.r rF" i ev s I�y rrtCt,`,i'� Y Ia L J �`j,hF P..A^1l1'crtr rsiti 11r ...:0 0 �',♦) 'r, r'* r vm,rni ' i{N f7t"3 ',IL 51J i' I� �SSn fn Y ( y,k.i n vt�'¢t.tJrc�Jlcf•(Y°JVµ�,�.,,'t if tV + A ) t�F4JTJ9 Vat�'A^� tl n "'.J{ S++- F CNT )' e0;24' 0,11, 1.;, 11 x }n 't tC7T`yr r�.4"1^FI `:a 07,1 tits i'ir. 4:.;; x.Ae4ly,}h . >Yy {lisr` !>'rJr<.I 11jf n1�,k `r't°jx7 �•7i't [ r '9''S+ i r 1 +V d l 1 r y i ) 'a e J 4\ c 1 t J fur�` 71.1 t J -r/. r .r 64 ,r 1 h ` 1 c.t trt.l 4/4, • _ 3..:Vt ''Sd4 i. 4^fta;4(1, ycrirtr.'SI ` Alt Jat 'tku r1 h ter si 1 ( MJ S %41 r 1 +Ih h � t tr< �o< [ 1' f. F11';5,, L 5 ?; jW.44 J t ,1 F`r1 n 1 f 0t∎ i Ak f .•l1tJ 3 t 1'IY` i 11��yty lil "IVI . r J , t P Jr !fFr 1Sr 1�7r ��tnill9 p•?r CIA' l-t-1 r t� K'f1Su� c 1 H"it f J 1J 1 r'�`}[ � 1�7 'twig • r"�1F^M1lVi1') tt\t.T' tidr rl vi 1 ". Sa 7 iJti1 +J a61 Zs1,,i :.J Jt, 13 1 Iyt,>�I t• A 4 u 'Y., ( -t kt rlai• J'".'.' 145 rf 11 11'1 Y f t + .,.t�tW y ✓.6.,:f,'tfuF� ri.' "t ' '-A�{i:tt*Ftf'�a dtT 'y't {>• ` ` $ 47 1i1 rr fT i 1 to t 1 �ie�IP K � i� �tKCTI<4 . r'ffh �`JHW�t51h JJ)h�1.12..f �r rr) (x�S�S,Y} Iyt IJ.lier ( Jt ry F11� I 1 1 111 I r r 'N ✓oS'i �Pr L e $I 4`f' t t `('4A VI S J r{ '-n t1. a 11:1 �s S wjR1.-' it trr>TeVA•'\ S eft l(L/t /kl e: YrAr�/ \lYit't "�I[i li. (. �S ikt:l 11 hl•lT�r•,•..•., I•,. i. it N' � i. 9. !. !s M1 rr'(14 L.r�alYliy>t}I Pv : a ttti. 1....15.1!‘.1 S. 1.1.�In 11..,.: . J ` 1_ ;e. • r..... .... J y t I V •):. . \ 1 _ .• ( J __ .... .. ._ __._-_ - ' t y • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'EPRE-SUBMIfAL RECD a n lM1 ' • •Attachment '4' .. . • .. . ' . . - • .. . • • • '• ' '. :- ' - - , 4-)4.P. :6,-. • 3. Form asfl—IOM -. • .. 1 .• . •• . . -. ., - P 5 AbproachPermitro _....,......r........:... . •. . • . (7,120 e:i1gpecliv'tklem Olden') - • , , .• .. .. . • . .., . . . - - GIONIGN STATE nIGHWAY 00110DISSION . . . . . . , . . . . . . .. • • Construct . . Applidation and Permit to Construdt Approach Road . . . . . . . • . • . • • siunee Hayes . . •• , Applicant, . (qinItt of porson,,prnkorcorporpllen) of Waqte 2 414notivo City • ' s .. . . . • • • Oregarli.undet • . . . ... ... .. the provisions of ORS 34008 to Mt 325,hereby declares and represents to la.Stain-Of:Oregon,by and through Its.State.HighWay. • • ..,. . .. . ,.... . .. .. .. ..- • •.. . ,. Commission, that he.is the owner/tifiagtof certainbeill.bropertynbutting upon intatehighWay at the following described location. • . '. and that he has lawful authority to apply tor•this permit and to re•enest and 'authorize the State of Oregon to -construct such.ap- • . ... . ., ... proable rartandmaken application for a'perroit.M oonstruct end,maintain a fgrancfperrrianent* approach road connecting said .. . . . .. • - — . :• .- . ".. .. .. . .. • •• --' - .• • • property onthe ...:............... .....:-.sitie•of •••• --- - • = - HighwaY. . .. . • . . , • . No. 3. „Route IVO.U.S./COMIC - 126 , Coati,Oregon,between/MM. . .. . . ItUgif. and. Siiringfiel4 • . - • . . • . - .. --.and,more particularly described as . . 0.33 19 ••• . • . .. • . being at Mile Post , Highway Engineer's Station •9/46 as MO:gaud by the•dimensions,figures and sketch map or plan contained herein. Mtg. 65;3-15 . • - -• . , - • - The applicant hereby agrees, that if such permit is.granted,to fully and faithfully comply with all the provisions and X egula‘. tions hereinafter set forth and such other reasonable rules or regulations,as.may thereafter be promulgated by the:.Oregart State • • Highway Commission governing the constratiothaliptermnee, and operation or use'of:ma approach road, and further agrees.to bear all expensna construction and maintenance of said approach road,' . •.. , .. . . : . •'• . .:' , . " . f: :. • . ...;.. • . . . .., . . • Date,. .• . ... . . . . . , • drartief •-• , c*, • . . • • - ...pre. , 7 .,asmumr) . - . ' • . ' • - . . . . . . .. • . . . .. . . . . . ' By . . . . ' . • ' . .. • . . .. ... .. - ' • . . . . . • . . . . . • . ' . . . . . . . . . • . . . • • : . , . ' - • . GENERAL PROVISIONS . • ... . .• • • : • - . - . • , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . • 1. No approach road or otherfaellIty shall-be constructed upon the highway right of way until a signed copy-of this Permit Is returned to the applicant. ' . . . : . . . . . •. - • • • . . . . . . - . . 2. The word Engineer as used herein shall mean the State HighWay,Engineer or tastily authorized representative.. . ..• .. . . . . ... . . . .. . . . ...- . . . . 3. This permit Is granted with the specific undereianding.that the applicant shall be responsible ad liable for all Accidents, - damage or injury to any person or property resulting from the construction,maintenance,repath•opeiation br use of-said approach•• • road for which the applicant may be•legally Rabin-and that,the applicant shall hold blameless and hanks!andshallindemnity.the • Stith of Oregon,its State'Highway Commission and members thereof,'its°Mari,-agents'and employeeeiagainst any and all • - demands,loss,injury, damage, actions and costs of actions.whatsoeve.t.,which they.or:any Of them may suitoln.by reasons of the acts, conduct oroperationa of the applicant,hinagents or employees In,connection with the•construction, maintenance, repair, operation-: • or use of said approach road, - . .. . . • . . ' - • . . ,• • • .. . . .. . . . • • 4. The construction,maintenance,dperation-and use of said approach roadia subject to the paramount bontrol of thelegislature• - .. over said highway, and no right or privilege herein'granted:shall be deemed or.bastruedA.be InOtend the reach or authority of-:• • the legislature to control the sold kighwaY, and the-applicant In accepting this permit accepts It knowing that the rights and privi- toga herein,granted may at any time ho defeated.and abrogated.by legislatlY8 act.' • • . • , . . • . . . ' . . . . . 5.-The stopping or parking of vehicles upon the state-highway right-of way-for the.servicing of such vehicles or-In further- ance of any business trajection or commercial establishment is strictly'prohibited. Minimum set back distances as shown by• • -• dimensions on the sketch map or plan herein for buildings,-pump islands,or.any other structure noW existing-on or hereafter placed on applicant's property, shall be strictly observed. NO APPROACH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR OR BY ANY APPLICANT.•• FAILING TO CONFORM, . . . • . . . - . • . • . 8. The number of approaches to a single property shall be limited to.a minimum that will.allow.the property-to.aectom- modals and service such traffic as may be reasonably antiathated, NO APPROACH ROAD WILL BE CONSTRUCTED-TO OR . PERMITTED ON A HIGHWAY Olt SECTION'THEREOF -WHERE RIGHTS . OF ACCESS TO OR FROM THE ABUTTING • PROPERTY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE STATE THROUGH PURCHASE OR GRANT OR WHERE RIGHTS OF ACCESS HAVE NEVER'ACCRUED. . . , • • " - , . • - , . •strike out word or words not nPP1lcaWa- . . • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D ... .... . . . . . . . .. . .• • . • •. . . • . APR 2 2 2013 • . . • . • • .., - • • 7. .In the construction.of an approach road.under this permit, either by the applicant or by the State at the expense of the applicant,-the State recognizes the'applicant'e ownership of the materials'entering into said construction, 1f, for any,reason tether then.reconstruction or widening-Of the lilghway),it later:becomdanecessary or:desirable for the State to remove such"approach road, it shall.be removed by the State•at the expense of the,applicant,.and• redit will be allowed for such materials,if any,as are-salvaged for re-use by the State, - - . B. If in the.event of the reconstruction or widening of any highway,It becomes necessary to remove, alter or reconstruct the approach road.constructed under authority of this permit;,the cost of such removalor replacement to a like width and condition wilt be borne by the State. Any widening or.other Improvement Of the approach read-at the applicant's request shall be done only under authority of-a neer permit:end-at the expense of'the applicant.. • .. . B. The construction of the approach road by,the applicant,his agent or contractor,(if authorized by the.Special Provisions of th!s:permit); will:be.permltted•only when,the'appllcant.furnlshas evidence'ot,having.af..hld,elspos.•tl ndequate:end suitable.equip- !pent for doing the work end:furnishes satisfactory.plans and specifications. • _ 10, Unless per itsion.for construction of the approach road in whole or in part by e.th applicant, his agent n ent or contractor, la specifically'granted'in th'e Special.Provisions•of this permit,'the construction-of said'approach road,will he done bg. the State, including the furnishing:and placing'of aln'materials•necessary for the completion of such-portion of the approach road that oacuplee the highway tight-at way;apedflcallyi'drainage facilities,'dirt,;rock;surfacing,-and curbsor other materials hated In Speclal,Yro- vtalons or shown on the-sketch map herein. . . 11. No materials vd11 e- bordered'by the`State'until this application,.completed`and.accompanied by cosh,'money order, or'•' • certified check, payable fa:the Oregon;State Highway:Commission, in the amount hereafter stated iii the Special Provisions, is-• approved. by the:_llistriot:Maintenance:Superintendent No construction will be undertaken by the State until.this permit is. . executed'and returned•ta the applicant and•all conditions specified.herein have been complied with: • It:. If the actual final coat ofwork done.or.materials furnished by the State in construction of all or any part of the approach; road is snore or less.th'en the estimated-coat thereof,the difference between the actual cost and the estimated cost will be refunded to the applicanter will be paidto the State Eby the applicant*!thin 10 days after receiving-a bill'therefor,'as the case may be. 13. Upon completion ofsald•approach-read,the applicant may perform additional-Minor work, such as seeding or planting of . island, working-or'cutting'edges Of said approach•etc:, provided that such'work is done in a manner so.as to cause no interference to traffio upon the highway end leperfornied at the applicant's sole expense. 14,. The entire expense of maintaining,said approach road shall be borne by the applicant,who 1s;hereby permitted to make minor repairs, such MI the correction of irregularities"in the surfacing of-the approach road,.,repair of curbs or walks,etc., pro- videdthat the maintenance work.does not interfere•with'or Interrupt traffic:upon and along the highway, No work'shali be done ' and no equipment be used by the applicant;on the shoulder Of the highway at any time,.unless applicant shall have first Secured '• ' approval from the Superintendent of Maintenance of the'diattict in'which the.approach.road is located._ '• •• • 16, No unauthorized signs shall,be placed,permitted or.maintained by the applicant.upon any portion of the right of way,nor shell ant signs not to lew be placed,permitted:or etaintalned.on property adjacent to:the'right:of Way (ORS 877.840 end 488.188).:Where standard;warning signs, such as "Look:Qut,for Log Trucks,"are required by this permit or'other regulations, • or'are ordered by.the Engineer to provide warning:of the•approach road;such-signs shall.be furnished and placed by the State at the expenae of theapplicant , _ , . it The planting• or.placing of Other adornments not;prohibited by law oh the island or any portion.of the right of way by the applicant shall be limited to low growing shrubs, grass, or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision in shy direction. No curbs, posts'.or other structures'shall he'placed on the highway right of way within ten (10) feet of the edge of pavemerit. - . .. . . - . 17. The applicant hereby authorizes officers, employees, agents; representatives-and contractors of the State Highway Commission to enter.upon property owned dr.leaned by said applicant for the purpose_of constructing the said-approach road.. '""18, The word "applicant"'and.all. references to the applicant contained herein shall include the plural'when appropriate. •. PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD • APR 2 2 2013 • • • . .. 2. APPROACH IlROAD: Type of surface ...&!Et....?'bide_..................__....._. Top width ..._.._...._...&I' • • Surface thickness .....aft in. Pipe required? ......._._.:_Bt.. .5tam. Length .._.._......._._-........._............. Kind Min. depth cover Bridge, catch basin or other unusual drainage facility required? ...........!f.p...__ (If go,oitplatn on attached sheet and submit sketch or specify Std.Plan Na, ) Treatment of island,if any— Wm) - .-- LIT.� Exc. Kind and amount of fill required._.._................_...._.._.........._...................,.........._......_...... :23 - _: i1d159 - Materials to be furnished or items of work.to.be done by applicant..,_....- ' ,rt,it i_. (ma ewmiloolly,or U eoneralaie"nona9l • ,: _� ).••.i.:t.. . • I YL .::• .. 0.14.ij 3,,. . ••• Materials to be furnished or items of work to be done by State...._...................:........:.__........._......_...._....._.._......... . .._............,._...__._._ Construct left turn limes widen 1petcr_o.f.e:e.._at,.rebuild curbs, for atteehed plea...._._-_ _ .. usl aawedllq or it none.Mato"none) Estimated cost of State work G31 ' Check,IRSf0`t3 MillbY ChOC C• .. 3. HIGHWAY SURFACE: Type. A6 Width 601 Curbs? .......... .1100-rA O.show WO Shoulder'-width ............._..,._......... Oiled? R/W-Width of this side..._»...._.....~_.—.........._...__...._..........._.._ Yun( nt Alignment at approach road ..... —• (On tangent,or ayp,ax.doures wary*loft or mini d Sight distance (from Pointe feet back of shoulder Or curb) ...,.... �-...:.._....___.._. ........ahead......_.Z t):1t . back Right of access purchased or otherwise obtained by Stute?1d t Ot 8DO68 1.1d44 beilif,1111!' .506sed Nature of business to be served by this approach Industrial Yee Is adequate space provided for parking vehicles off the WW?�a,) Permit recommended ....................._...__........._.....,........ .. .r...,...... Date ../. .............._..._._._ (Marla Mnin,.rys *Wart dmnl . Permitrecommended ................... ..............._ . ..._•........_....,.....-........................_........._........., Date ......._.../.....'.:^6 .:.'::=._xrr..._ - _ •amvlalon snclneor AUTHORIZATION OF PERMIT In consideration of the applicant's agreement to comply in all respects with the regulations of the State Highway Commission covering such operations, permission Is hereby granted for the construction of the approach road or driveway as described in the above application and Special Provisions, said approach road or driveway to be in accordance with the regulations herein sot forth. It Is expressly understood that this permit is conditioned upon replacement or restoration of the highway to its original or to a satisfactory condition. It is further understood that this permit is issued subject to the approval of local, city or town authorities having joint supervision over said street or highway. / OREGON STATE HIGHW 3r 0 M(4-0-1-------I�+SI Dated ................................t..� L/ E+ 'y" Ey_:y'c::?"..,...•. . .... . stn,.Prl,„Ire _..... ....._.........._.?RE-SUBMi `AL P. C'D • APR 2 2 2013 • •SPECIAL PROVISIONS • 1. The approach road covered by.thla'permit'shall be Single/dose and shall conform to-tile dimensions and figures indtcated'on • the following or atteehed sketch map,crbss-section'and schedule of-dimensions, and shall be Constructed to the grade established by the Engineer. - - - .. . - SAD-ROAD- ' Right Angle or Skew Construction Optional Curb Return or Prop Curb Opt/snot When Curb Required • of n . . T S ' w . . •• Right of' Way Lint . o W • " edge'oflhouldn, f f djo_fShoulder i w„.;= e..t1. t v u dt 1 t iii. s� xF>• n.2. 7$$ .,trktil . • Ql atj • DUAL. APPROACH ROAD . DUAL APPROACH ROAD HOT PERMITTED/P TOTAL•HIGHWAY£RONTAGt IS LESS THAN 100 PERT ,� •. • Right Any/e:or Skew Construction Optional I a Curti Return or-Drop-Curb Optional:When Curb'Required b.'' a. .. ... • Di: .. • . . A. IAaxAS .. pump3' - �a�'N,....,,,. t Skew . . .. 0) ` .. S W 4�• d \\ —2J/� t ��Jdge or Shoulder•Edge of shoo/der ,,_� i • • Rd•a of ov mdnt or nor ear-o or movie• trofho/ono • - e s,i, ,IisY4.`14, :T;:c. icy" - -1;4/ELe tki*} '�S �l° �1A-.• , W1 a. . SCHEDULE tit'. DIMENSIt7NS. • • Applicable to Single-or Dual Type Access' :- - " . .. 0 men elan ••- ' m M inldm...•. . ., • Mc x ltnum Approved D7.:: . 10'.' . ` None. . :: .101¢• • D2e: 18�:. - None{ • ' 101 ... - . • : R ... a' 16. . M . ID' None • • W 18' .• . 80 451 3 .10' None.: • so: Nana PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • • .. Angle of SkeW 90' . 4l3'.. : - 90 • *One common approach to adjacent property may be permitted provided .W does not`6RSn¢ea �'ZU13 . t Winn out were not eppIies te. _ - 1 I . • Attachment '5' • • • S 7 t 0 irk 11111 ijn lMail 1s� I a � f li. it fp l c S t .e . 11111 k - 1 . - Ii t$ Ew kr:- � s m t � � y e 4 ; 1 f� ii ;lb 03ee iiiI w . 1g i oly]ga ; it II1II;E .iillt ! kei �. aa rJ gnarl. .- i Q R 13`T� O 3i s- 4 z° i 2 z Six it. 0 ; s d 8 >04Xo. e v c °- CDil� t � s "- i I ac w tEi W fra. 8 C e r7 0 0 X iidi1flt;iU- C7 l B 5 O i la 1 I ta- I ill Teg . i c 0 El 0 0 EIXO is o N 24a • I 1 4? i 1 _ -� i y it 1 1a1 11 ) lob g � 3 4 s * ! 1 in 1z- r t~ • -- d � s ill Iti � o � a a� � � aia 4 1 I N III I it I I I rvzn ilia g5 3r ''�� entTo ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1a 8 1111111 1 P rs cn a r PH 111 Om • Attachment '6' • 1�' WESTERN TITLE & ESCROW COMPANY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.FSB Successor Trustee of the E1a1&Armes Trust Dtd 11/27/2001 Amendment 2/5/04 hereinafter called grantor,for the consideration hereinafter stated,to grantor paid by Alpesb Patel and KomalS Patel,as tenants by the entirety hereinafter called grantee,does hereby grant,bargain,sell and convey unto the grantee and the grantee's heirs, successors and assigns,that certain real property,with the tenements.heredltaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any way appertaining.situated in_County,State of Oregon,described as follows,to•wln _ 17 03 3433 00700 sect 50299436 - 17 03 34 33 00700.901 acct a 1507381 See Attached Exhibit"A" To Have and to Hold the same unto grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns forever. An grantor hereby covenants to and with grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns,that the real hesame and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claimssard demands offaagmpersons warrant g 6 defend through,or under the grantor. The we and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars.is 5390,000.00 In construing this deed,where the context so require,the singular Includes the plural,and all grammatical Changes shall be made so that this deed shall apply equally to corporations and to Individuals. In witness whereof.the grantor has executed this instrument on July .2007 ;if grantor is a corporation.it has caused Its name to be signed and its seal,If any.affixed by an officer or other person duly authorised to do so by order of its board of directors. IRIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OPTHE PROPERTY DESCRIED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP �IRWO P8871H=TOTEPRPROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WIPHTHEAPPR CRY OR WUPrrY PLANNING PERSON .. DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMNEANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMINO OR ItRESf PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.390. MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.FSB Successor Trustee of the Madre Armes Trust Dd 11127/2001 . L). _ � Brian Sagllmben.V. Estate Officer RA STATE OP 1'ieN UERS E'(County of MEXCCP• J ass This inwumem was acknowledged before me on Jm.r 3,42001 by Brian Saglimben V.P.Real Estate Officer for Merrill Lynch Bank&Trust Co.FSB Successor Trustee of the Elaine H.Awns Trust Dated 1 127/2001 Amendment 2/5/04 iii <.:. .d SOLI '' BARBARA A.CORRADO /,:• .: •Y Notary Public for-0ngen amiligar NOTARY PUBLIC OT NELIERBEY / V/ d" ') •tt. My commission expires //777 • R my •�gglgso wins go mod r ;! C 1 M NW Recording Return To: 4 wswI tNmetemat of Leer Cetaty r�441.. .N •• 4887 Many Rd,Suite 340,Eugene OR 07401 ' A' Undla dump all tax satemenu Scan M Nan to the knotty addroa Arndt Paul aed Kernels Paid �� Division Chief B■PULY Clerk 2074105 f"At\Wi1f■) aAA Lane County Doody and Rupert Gk9cr¢ C111403�3 111Mill I I IIIII1p(II (Q "I ® RPR—DEED Cnt■t StnnO CASHIER Os rI'c � M1'�Al EC D *woo $11.00 $10.00 .. ��( VAvP�R 2 2 2013 • • • . • EMOURR •A" • • • No. 65,, at a the Towaslip 17 South, RaRange3Nestt of theClalm Willamette Meridian, 14.45 chine South73" 30' Nest from the Northeast corner thereof and running tonnes South 5.44 wins to the center of the slough running Easterly and Westerly tnrougn aid claim, thence up the center of said slough North 87* Bast 1.77 Chains, theete North parallel with the East line of said claim S.ee chains, to the North Line of said claim and thence South 7P 30' Nest 1.8S chains to the place of bginning. being a part of said Donation lend Claim in Lane County, State of Oregon. ALSO, Beginning at a point on South line of Pacific Highway right of may South 0. 03' East 57.8 feet from a isiSouth174 i13'' Westt831.66 feet from elstNOos Donation cornerlofm the Zara Sweet lend Donation Land Claim No. 6S, in Township 17 South. Range 3 Nest of the - - -.Willamette Nerteten,.thence along:SDUth line of Pacific Highway tient of way[belie Soutn 18. _ _ North 740 01,ence South 880 Nest O 6 of 55.3 Son, thence North 0. tn 01 Nest 388.1 feet, more or less, to point of beginning, all in lane County. Oregon. I PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • Attachment '7' • WESTERN TITLE & ESCROW COMPANY OF.LANE COUNTY EUGENE OFFICE•497 OAKWAY ROAD,SUITE 340•PO BOX 10960•Bogen,Oregon 97440 (541)485-3588•FAX(541)485-3597 ougenecstonuille.com DATE: June 15,2007 WESTERN TITLE&ESCROW COMPANY OF LANE COUNTY Report No:50-0174107 ATTN: Lisa Lemonds Your No:50-0174107 497 OAKWAY ROAD SUITE 340 EUGENE,OR 97401 - PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT STANDARD OWNER'S POLICY $390,000.00 PREMIUMS: STANDARD OWNER'S PREMIUM $1,130.00 LOCAL GOVERNMENT LIEN SEARCH $15.00 We are prepared to issue a title insurance policy by Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation,in the form and amounts listed above. This report is preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and shall become mill and void unless a policy is issued,and the full premium therefore paid. The land hereinafter described is situated in the County of Lane,State of Oregon,and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT"A" VESTED IN: MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.,FSB,Successor Trustee of THE ELAINE 14.ARMES TRUST dated November 27,2001 Dated as of June 7,2007 at 5:00 p.m. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 , • 111 • • Order No.50-0174107 Page No.2 Subject to the exceptions,exclusions and stipulations,which are pad of said policy,and to the exceptions as shown herein: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public record;proceedings by a public agency which may result in tensor assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights,interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said laud or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,or claims of easement,not shown by the public records,reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof,water rights,claims or title to water. 4. Any encroachment(of existing improvements located on the subject land onto adjoining land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the subject land),encumbrance,violation, variation,or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the subject land. 5. Any lien,or right to lien,for services,labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the herein described property lying within the limits of roads and highways. 7. My adverse claim based on the assertion that: (a) Said land or any part thereof is now or at any time has been below the ordinary high water mark of Slough. (b) Some portion of said land has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portion so created. (c) Some portion of said land has been brought within or removed from the boundaries thereof by a change in the location of Slough. 8. This property is within the Willamette River Greenway and is subject to all laws and regulations pertaining thereto,including,but not limited to ORS 390.310 through 390.368 inclusive. 9. An easement created by instrument,including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded: March 13, 1942 Document No.: 108268,Deed Records To: State of Oregon by and through its State Highway Commission 10. An easement created by instrument,including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded: August 3, 1944 Document No.: 138759,Deed Records In favor of: Glenwood Water District,a municipal corporation PRE-SUBMI1TAl REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • Order No.50-0174107 Page No.3 11. Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan Notice,including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded: December 14,2004 Document No.: 2004-095229,Official Records 12. Any claims against the Estate of Elaine H.Armes,deceased,in favor of the State of Oregon, Department of Human Resources,Senior and Disabled Services Division. 13. A certification of trust under which the trustee(s)hold title,to the herein described property should be furnished for our review. (The Elaine H.Armes Trust dated November 27,2001) NOTE: Taxes paid in full for the year 2006-2007 Original Amount: $2,264.09 Tax Lot No.: 17 03 34 33 00700 Account No.: 0299436,Code 04-28 Taxes paid in full for the year 2006-2007 Original Amount: $88.37 Tax Lot No.: 17 03 34 33 00700-901 Account No.: 1507381,Code 04-28 (Improvement Only) (Billboard) NOTE: We find no judgment liens or tax liens against Al Patel. NOTE: The property address as shown on the Assessors Printout is: 3005&3007 FRANKLIN BLVD EUGENE,OR 97403 Any questions concerning the closing of this transaction should be directed to Lisa Lemonds,your Escrow Officer at(541)485-3588. Any questions concerning Preliminary Title Report should be directed to Jerilyn Egger at(541)431-3710. cc: REMAX PROPERTY SPECIALISTS 88344 TERRITORIAL HWY VENETA,OR 97487 Attn: ELIZABETH SIGEL Ph:(541)4854700 Fx:(541)935-1859 cc: REMAX INTEGRITY 4710 VILLAGE PLAZA LOOP SUITE 200 EUGENE,OR 97401 Attn: HEATHER ROMITO Ph:(541)345-8100 Ex:(541)302-4899 NOTE: For copies of exceptions,please contact our Customer Service Department at (541)284—8011 or email your request to cuxencnwesterntitle.com PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Order No.50-0174107 Page No.4 EXHIBIT"A" Beginning at a point in the North line of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No.68,Notification No.3284 in Township 17 South,Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, 14.45 chains South 73°30' . West from the Northeast corner thereof and running thence South 5.44 chains to the center of the slough running Easterly and Westerly through said claim,thence up the center of said slough North 87°East 1.77 chains,thence North parallel with the East line of said claim 5.88 chains,to the North line of said claim and thence South 73°30'West 1.85 chains to the place of beginning,being a part of said Donation Land Claim in Lane County,State of Oregon. ALSO: Beginning at a point on South line of Pacific Highway right of way South 0°03'East 57.8 feet from a point which is on North line of Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim and which point is South 74° 12' West 831.6 feet from the Northeast corner of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No.68,in Township 17 South,Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,thence along South line of Pacific Highway right of way North 74°01'30"East 57,0 feet,thence South 1°0'East 360.0 feet to center of slough,thence South 88° West 55.3 feet,thence North 0°03'West 388.1 feet,more or less,to point of beginning,all in Lane County,Oregon. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Attachment '8' BPHWOR01! .. . ,. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/Engineering Division Phone:(541)726-3753 Fax:(541)736-1021 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK —(Area below this line fi fled out by Applicant)--- (Please retain to Malt Slender®City of Springfield Fabric Works Engineering;Fax it 736-1021,Phone ti 736.1031) Project Name: Cendlewood Suites Applicant; App.Rep:Richard M Sabre Assessor❑ Parcel 17033433-00700 and 17033344-00100 Date: April 16,2013 " Land Use(s): Piuposetl 85 Unit Hotal '�' PhD nO#: 541-688-4540 (Ogres): 98,334 sf(Approx.2.28 acres) Fax 541.886-4577 Appr�o❑ Impervio Os 31,336sf Email: dck @schirmersatre.cam 1.4 nWll0i.11413:.?TA`Ji ATIL'S;I13R.[yx,.nl`'C•-'.an]n...+i✓'.,u r.;e2i a.Tn IPa.]'i :rl'r::J::irg14 yr.,IM4 r.n,l�l!xn'. � , 1 ` _yWi'r':� .till:u;. I .1;`I 'n r �„i,Ii�.,eH!^1. Project Description(include a copy of Assessor's map): Development of a 5-story,65-unit Candlewood Suites Hotel on Franklin Blvd in Glenwood. Includes primary access off of Franklin Blvd,parking for 86 vehicles,drive aisles and loading area;as well as landscaping and a vegetated stormwater swabs of approximately 3,200 sf. • Drainage Proposal(Public connection(s),discharge location(s),etc. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: • On-site stormwater runoff will collect into catch basins which drain into the proposed vegetated swate. Runoff will be vegetatively pre-treated and allowed to either percolate or evaporate. Storm event flows will flow from the swab°Into the adjacent existing riparian/wetland along the southern border of the situ(Reach#4 of the Glenwood Slough). See attached Grading and Utility Plan and excerpt from Springfield Stormwater Master Plan. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Construction phase:Erosion control measures. Development: 100%runoff will he vegetatively treated. —(Area below fhb line Merl out by the City and Returned to the Applicant; (At a minimum,all boxes checked by the City on the from and back of this sheet shall be submitted' for an application to be complete for submitla4 although other requirements may he necessary.) Drainage Study Type(EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note,MI may be substituted for Rational Methodl ❑ Small Site Study–(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid-Level Development Study—(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Full Drainage Development Study—(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: N Wellhead Zone: u/A ® Hillside Development: 0Jt. II Wetl and/RQparial: 1pr„J p,ort•u,nos Floodway/Floodl3lain: r✓/A Soil TyW1e: yzy6 — c We-t4,I.s s:,Ify Clay „ Othe& lvectcxtrio].t; bear Downstream AnalVs : ").tw Ltd"'_•e-_- ate– C N/A W ❑ Flowtine for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design 1.10L to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Matt Stonder @ City of Springfield,email:mstouder gcl.springfield.or.us,FAX:(541)736-1021 toof11 PRE-SUBMIITA.LREC'D APR 2 2 2013 1 • • COMPLETE STUDY TTEMS . Pot official Use Only: Mgt *Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet,the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage;however,this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development:Code(SDC)or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute silo approval;Additional site speck Information may be required. Note:Upon scoping sheet submittal,ensure completed form has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality(EDSPM Chapter 3) Re 'd N/A ❑ All non-building rooftop(NBR)impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated(e.g.multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media)lbr stormwater quality. Additionally,a minimum of 50%of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. i'. ❑Where required,vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards(EDSPM Section 3.02), _ -- set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services(BES)or Clean Water Services(CWS). —C, a r..t. streamer a f ® ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet,a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by:the DES for vegetative treatment. Al ❑ If a stormwater treatment swab is proposed,submit calculations/specifications for sizing,velocity,flow,side slopes, bottom slope,and seed mix consistent with either DES or CWS requirements. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM ❑ All building rooftop mounted equipment,or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building,shall ' be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements(EDSPM Section 4.03) ® 0 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. ❑ A complete drainage study,as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1,including a hydrological study map. ' :e? Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event. ''J'. ❑ The time of concentration(Tc)shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) ❑ n A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the • Oregon Plumbing Specially Code(OPSC). ❑ ig Elevations of the HOL and Bowlines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems(EDSPM Section 4.04) 67 ❑ Flow lines,slopes,rim elevations,pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, . or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb . load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ r Menning's"n"values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three(3)feet per second at 0.5 pipe full bused on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Misc • C ❑ Existing and proposed contours,located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains .7 ❑ Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another ❑ 'i", Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs,with the exception of residential building roofs(EDSP Section 3.03.4A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the-website: www.dea.state.or.us/wq/groundwn/ulohome,bpji for more information. ❑ gg. Detention pond's shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year stoat events *This farm shall be Included as an attachment,beside the front cover,of the stormwater study i *IMPORTANT•ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN! As the engineer of record,I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan sot, mf / Al Signature: • ' nom Date: ' J 4 3 11 of 11 PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 f • Attachment '9' • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD Springfield, Oregon Prepared For: Alpesh Patel 1857 Franklin Boulevard Springfield, Oregon 97403 Prepared By:, TRT Engineering LLC 2636 SE Market Portland, OR 97214 (503)235-7592 April 16,2013 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER 1 SECTION A-PROJECT OVERVIEW 2 SECTION B-METHODOLOGY AND ANAYLSIS 2 SECTION C-ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS 3 SECTION D-STORMWATER FACILITY 3 SECTION E-OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 3 LIST OF APPENDICES 'APPENDIX 1 -FIGURES APPENDIX 2-STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 • CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER 3005 Franklin Boulevard Candlewood Suites Motel Stormwater Management Report I hereby certify that this Stormwater Management Report has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets the minimum standards of the City of Springfield and normal standards of engineering practice. I hereby acknowledge and agree that the jurisdiction does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability, or performance of the drainagefaciiities designed by me. X!ts .This document was: OREGON 9 0 Y 1 by: dyp 4 f 30/1 Prepared f eP azed Timothy R.Turner, PE • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Stormwater Management Report APR 2 2 2013 Candlewood Suites April,2013 Page I I. • • SECTION A—PROJECT OVERVIEW Existing Conditions The project is located on the south side of Franklin Boulevard east of the Interstate 5 overpass in Springfield, Oregon within the SW 1/4 of Section 34 and SE 1/4 of Section 33,T.17S., R.3W., WM. (see Figure 1 —Appendix 1). The subject facility consists of Tax Lots 100 and 700. The stormwater drainage treatment facilities are to be constructed on Tax Lot 700. Tax'Lot 100 is currently approximately 70%developed with a gravel parking lot and mobile ' offices associated with a temporary construction operation. The remainder of the parcel is covered with vegetation mostly along the south and west boundary. Tax Lot 700 includes an unoccupied single-family residence and two out-buildings.The buildings are surrounded by lawn and landscaped vegetation. The ground slopes to the south with a gradient less than 5%. There are delineated wetlands along the south parcel boundary. A portion of the subject property is within the 100-year floodplain. Site Soils A February 27, 2013 Geotechnical Site Investigation by K&A Engineering,Inc. indicates the subsurface condition on Tax Lot 700 consist of 2 to 4-feet of dark brown organic silt and/or clay over 4 to 7-feet of fine alluvium. Groundwater surface was observed at 5.2 to 7.8-feet below ground surface. Proposed Development The proposed development is to construct a motel building and associated sidewalks,driveways and parking lots. A public sanitary sewer will be extended to serve the motel. A combination biotreatment and infiltration swale will be constructed to handle the post-development stormwater runoff.The swale will be located near the south boundary of Tax Lot 700 adjacent to the wetlands.The swale will have a high flow discharge spillway which will drain to the wetlands(see Figures 2 and 3, Appendix 1). The swale was designed consistent with the city of Portland Stormwater Manual. SECTION B—METHODOLOGY AND ANAYLSIS The swale sizing is done with the HydroCad version 9.10 hydraulic modeling program(see Appendix 2). No on-site soil infiltration testing was done during the investigation. The test boring nearest the swale location(B-4) showed silt and fine-grained sand to a depth of 4 feet and sandy silt below that. Based on this boring an assumed infiltration rate of 2.0 inches per hour was used for the (` swale design. Stormwater Management ReportMITTAL REC'D X age April 2013 APR 2 2 2013 Table 1 shows a summary of the modeling. Table 1 Storm Rainfall Peak Incoming Peak Swale Bypass Bypass Event Amount, in Flow, cfs Elevation, ft Elevation, ft Flow, cfs Treatment 0.83 0.16 432.78 434.00 0.00 2-year 3.30 0.77 434.07 434.00 0.20 10-year 4.30 1.01 434.16 434.00 0.78 Contributing Drainage Area The contributing drainage area for the Swale is approximately 43,995 square feet(see Figure 2). Downstream Discharge The swale is designed to infiltration the entire runoff from up the treatment storm event. For greater storm events a portion of the treated runoff will flow over the bypass weir to the wetlands. SECTION C—ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS The post-development runoff will be treated prior to infiltration to the underlying soils. Releases to the wetland will be only for storm events greater than the treatment rainfall event. SECTION 1)—STORMWATER FACILITY The proposed swale location and associated drainage basins are shown on Figure 2. SECTION E—OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The operations and maintenance of the swale is the responsibility of the motel owner,Alpesh Patel. storm water Management Report Candle �� SUBMITTAL RECD April 2013 APR 2 2 2013 • • APPENDIX 1 -FIGURES PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 I. ._�. • • ✓7 v"4 5 • z,z F 1 r �S♦ 1,; a a %� n. h dY �J 'P 4. C ;.. a r �y^ nM~aae Ttf y I � s a F q ilY 3 � 13 i i° t r n i f r t i � zr .� � + S { i f iv pi rg gt ii 5 t y{ F ki vL )i `g e C 4 �eu�9l:v.;cF Kt a c''Nf c i i . t{ � £ r n tri 11 a eri a c4 3 t � � l r l -n a} t 2 4 p ` i z �v ' � vt3I '" K ;t` .' ∎, er t s g n � 4F i 4 :Z !# u3 t 6 �w ``'� ,lie: t�a,V-).t; 4+ k{tE� 1 " < t i � ' xa'a zTr1gt-4 J*1" % i c.kik tiii r a. 4 Y e Y;Ls v €4.2- a ;Ir 3 .xte" i , - x Ty a �RT.t k i, H t�ti5i.d e '�4a4.ra cYlabS NINt -T.+ *1 be' 1 [ W 1 . _Y i1h44 t _AC 1i-ls ti >Zna i114 w. x i i1Y E. b i S � £ y a }+ s€rIl c, +raRYi3 . x + y i r x c p ` xii T t r nC i i � d n i � ld , b R v .tT r. . Tk„ l5 CO3 ,,8 1 1• : Fe ; t v "n f e Aph'r4 4 2 H r i rli in--'':q} 4 t K 4211w � t t' 1 � is 2 ifiP+ s` I v7. z.1�r f; d yix;rr� ¢ 4 { 4ja . `) 1 2 v- y" i y.f )� b : Af E lr A,:; n4 oi p � F9 Y� y fti eC : frv? ' t { a * l ^ :+ci k h L -..t ' N t , e V(r * k NCAJ.rfrec 7. edPS .., ,.;. c r 4ir si 2:( r '5 - - . a � tGgc-4Po [ . + a3 u u de d -{ xenigiA.V AjY .2 ' -t -':" ti;-,-15,---y 7F q a � tfh na rr�a d .Fl rY xdJ. x� l} ' 3.*.:c i r 1 X2N,41- 1.FAi d "t. -i ea 44--, { *° < :° }°a44.A. t aY e q'T 53 Nt l a ,t � f °j z a A°:" i1;ji- 4:4ir . e i h.-t r d ;: t '. c . 41?!x fijs i x . 4r1".! mss. iri*xi t;x! , b ' r l- J? ya c- ar r vt{ . y i. .i -� n X -x 9 id i -y t a(4 'v r... r f i tY i r ^cY Y 4 4 1.-e iee� > ar ala a' kpc .a3 t 1 N iT!e 1 ht 1 tT ; 4s..., if.n k3 X':fc; ak a r 4a as 1s .✓ r - t~ !11165 i t' ke t ♦` 'r rhi e i i' 4V Ln �ro ix �. r� : d r t.V v t i i 1 it S--44 -i: i Mxw fMrn. S �4�t i > •y ={ r t elk.ks:,Q c" ! {e.- vi r] s b r a K-i 1a �a�a 1 + t i 0 aao- . je`Y a.<a A pn; a i a fl�.x h . 4 @^< 4-4z ize P ii 1 KE3 r" '>r`iaL °i1c w a"�sqn kw6 `a FafrY� x. x� fi y 3 . Fr ,.� ° ' biW l 'tty� 5 na .ti��u* } � ' r . x °.y�r ist4 ^ 4 %..5, ` G c.„91. 1' a. t tr 1 a cc,ii„tPr . t E{e ,rwt 1/21 Nk { A t -.V0 44, .. .a ri k ° x ,S ,. a ?: .k ... `S t 5 a.$�wr $- d e p t y 7 1 t veT mk. .x'r i eg0t -..40.144t-s. .1:. Y3Cr s F en1�$ '.. 3 w �.S > y iT, itgii a rl y! tltt' 4 a ` r�� T1�x3, '` ` ^41--4Y ti a , e f t t 4 F ,, A x l iMi t Ati m, r 'x $.4 f ) l'Y r. r W Y6rtt 1at1I f 9 aie,if e°C)G t' Ys,v ,.+.aPt l a kq V w S y.} S g *i`c p `n (a III2b s z . yr+.a S1t .„ f ., (YSY°i iA,,,y t" J J ... 9,914.9,99 VICINITY MAP CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STORMWATER DRAINAGE REPORT SPRING FIGURE 1 4/1/13 FIGURE 1 RE S�SEM!U&' II,ECI® 6 APR1222013O • • (McKo / 4�% i 5 pU\eVpfd ,,.. k1\n 8 w^'4 • - " MOTEL', BUILDING ' } I II I I - I i J :T= L % ®II ; =i, BASIN. . Ii ' —1,-, 'a ., I 439 / ` I; TL 700 \ l IIIISJIIItI 0 / I ' I \ - • ( 438 ' Illt �.\ 433 •33 SWALE \<, ilia 433 H; & L \'.;' \ 1 ' —411 Ot \I\\\' IGH-FLOW BYPASS IDRAINAGE BASIN_ . — — — — 1 — / WETLANDS Ill I ! - - � - p 40 8D / ._..:. CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STORMWATER DRAINAGE REPORT FIGURE 2 [, C pr� 1 SPRING DRAINAGE 4/16/13 PRE-S6 KW O APR 222013 III 1 w.o D to � u\ F , o 9 a ce _i \ \ \ .\ \ — _ _ — ' i 00tt m� WQ� ,� ; 1. 0§2 O mN c . 7 T- I n N_ T ----, . --/ Zm n ti S ry0 p / F to p .p. e•w U FP S O b / P t NI N Y d , Z. I, , a , g ---,-.61, Kg F NNN F VD ^NN Nnn $$$ d' - n nIvZ 8 nnn rn a I 5 iii rn as ' gs I I\ g! s h®T± Tj;:_t:: - • ss bg � as Ut Ha go 1 f r. ' N N I` pp ;Z py W W �•N�<N/ y{�� LIN N m (J., g h a =as I PRE-S nEL'0 i UBivii��r+. APR 2 2 2013 • • APPENDIX 2 - STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • �z a Y -t .E-tf < y r 1 Y 5' Roof and parking lot Swale eit Reach 'on. i141 Drainage Diagram for Franklin ,ray -.O w„ Prepared by TRT Engineering, Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 stn 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-SUBMITIAL REC'D APR 222013 • • Franklin Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.028 85 landscape (1S) 0.874 98 roof and pavement (1S) 0.080 98 swale (1S) 0.982 TOTAL AREA PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.63" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.16 cfs 0.051 af Pond 2P: Swale Peak Elev=432.78' Storage=282 cf Inflow--0.16 cfs 0.051 af .. .......:.. .. Discarded=0.05 cfs 0.051 af Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.051 af Total Runoff Area=0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.051 of Average Runoff Depth =0.63" l�• 2.90%Pervious=0.028 ac 97.10%Impervious=0.953 ac PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 10 Summary, for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 0.16 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth> 0.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Area (sf) CN Description ' 38,065 98 roof and pavement ' 1,240 85 landscape 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area = 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.63" for Treatment event Inflow = 0.16 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Atten= 67%, Lag=62.7 min Discarded = 0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 432.78' @ 8.94 hrs Surf.Area= 1,160 sf Storage= 282 cf Plug-Flow detention time 33.2 min calculated for 0.051 of(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 31.2 min ( 753.1 - 721.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 IBC 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 PRE-$UDIVI1I IAl REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 O 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs HW=432.78' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.05 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=432.50' (Free Discharge) t2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) PRE-SUBMI1TAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering I Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.06" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.77 cfs 0.251 af Pond 2P: Swale Peak Elev=434.07' Storage=2,775 cf Inflow=0.77 cfs 0.251 af Discarded=0.13 cfs 0.191 of Primary=020 cfs 0.023 of Outflow=0:33 cfs 0.214 af. Total Runoff Area=0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.251 of Average Runoff Depth=3.06" 2.90% Pervious=0.028 ac 97.10%Inipervious=0.953 ac I � PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 0.77 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af, Depth> 3.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Area (sf) CN - Description • 38,065 98 roof and pavement ' 1,240 85 landscape 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area= 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.06" for 2-year event Inflow = 0.77 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af Outflow = 0.33 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Atten= 57%, Lag=30.3 min Discarded = 0.13 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.191 of Primary = 0.20 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev=434.07' @ 8.36 hrs Surf.Area= 2,765 sf Storage= 2,775 cf Plug-Flow detention time 234.1 min calculated for 0.214 af(85%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 132.9 min ( 795.6-662.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storaqe Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 - 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 4.34.00' 5.0'long x 5.0'breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 8.36 hrs HW=434.07' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.13 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.20 cfs @ 8.36 hrs HW=434.07' (Free Discharge) AL2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.20 cfs @ 0.60 fps) PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Star-kid method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.06" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.01 cfs 0.332 of Pond 213: Swale Peak Elev=434.16' Storage=3,054 cf Inflow=1.01 cfs 0.332 af Discarded=0.14 cfs 0.206 at Primary=0.78 cfs 0.077 of Outflow=0.91 cfs 0.282 of Total Runoff Area=0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.332 af Average Runoff Depth =4.06" 2.90% Pervious=0.028 ac 97.10%Impervious=0.953 ac PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 222013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment IS: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 1.01 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.332 af, Depth> 4.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Area (sf) CN Description * 38,065 98 roof and pavement • 1,240 85 landscape • 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area = 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 4.06" for 10-year event Inflow = 1.01 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.332 af Outflow = 0.91 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.282 af, Atten= 10%, Lag= 10.6 min Discarded = 0.14 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.206 af Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af Routing by Stor-Ind method,Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 434.16' @ 8.03 hrs Surf.Area=2,923 sf Storage= 3,054 cf Plug-Flow detention time 198.5 min calculated for 0.282 of(85% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 94.3 min( 750.5-656.3 ) ! Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0'breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 _ 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 O 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 8.03 his HW=434.16' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.14 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 8.03 hrs HW=434.16' (Free Discharge) t2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.78 cfs @ 0.95 fps) PRE-SUBMITIPI.REC'D APR 222013 • • Attachment '10' ply F• Oregon Department of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 Salem,OR 97301-1279 •• ;. John A.Kit hater,MD,Governor (503)986-5200 FAX(503)378-4844 www.oregonstatel ands.us October 27, 2011 State Land Board City of Springfield Attn: John Tamulonis, Community Development Manager John n.-Kil,haber,MD Fifth Street _ Springfield, Oregon •197477 Governor _. /Alpesh Patel Kate Brown 1857 Franklin Boulevard Secretary of State Eugene, Oregon 97403 Ted Wheeler Re: Wetland Delineation Report for Glenwood, Lane County; T17S State Treasurer R3W Sec. 33DD, Tax Lots 100 & 200, Sec. 34CC Tax Lots 500 &700;WD#2011-0219, Springfield, Glenwood Area Local Wetlands Inventory wetland GS-2 • Dear Mr. Tamulonis and Mr. Patel: The Department of State Lands has reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. for the site referenced above. Based upon the information presented in the report and additional information submitted upon request, we concur with the wetland boundaries as mapped in Figure 6 of the report. Please replace all copies of the preliminary wetland map with this final Department-approved map. Within the study area, one wetland (totaling approximately 0.40 acres) and no waterways were identified. The wetland is subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. Under current regulations, a state permit is required for cumulative fill or annual excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in the wetland (or below the ordinary high water line-(OHWL)of a waterway). This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law-only. Federal or local permit requirements may apply as well. The Army Corps of Engineers will review the report and make a determination of jurisdiction for purposes of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit application is submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to both copies of any subsequent joint permit application to speed application review. Please be advised that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Department staff on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. • PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD - APR 2 2 2013 at a • This concurrence is based on information provided to the agency. The jurisdictional determination is valid for five years from the date of this letter, unless new Information necessitates a revision. Circumstances under which the Department may change a determination are found in OAR 141-090-0045 (available on our web site or upon request). In addition, laws enacted by the legislature and/or rules adopted by the Department may result in a change in jurisdiction; individuals and applicants are subject to the regulations that are in effect at the time of the removal-fill activity, or complete. permit application. The applicant, landowner, or agent may submit a request for reconsideration of this determination in writing within six months of the date of this letter. Thank you for having the site evaluated. Please phone me at 503-986-5297 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1)414-7:>\ Approved by. 614-J Jevra Brown Anna Buckley Wetland Specialist Acting Wetlands Program Manager Enclosures etc: Craig Turner, Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. • City of Springfield Planning Department(Maps enclosed for updating LWI) Brian Wilson, Corps of Engineers, Eugene office Gloria Kiryuta, DSL PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 1 • • - -..., •aff. II -.,, exesalter.. :%.‘..a.... %c"• 7.... ... I.I:. . .... .•.•••,••s. 7.7.7. .1......,;1. ' 1 %,.,... % re.,.....::.;..:.: , , 1 r. -• •••• -in b • S., - . 1 'es',i. * Ail ,00 .s.:_..4.4,..y.n• . ii,<,., : 1 -..t.......-•.::-.--7, 1. . i • i It • i i J. • • __-_VA :g .1. ii 4.14.3§1, •,1 1 . .. zzeol I. t , )41. __ 021111 '. • I , ! 43I i -- illic inliti• -42( 0.3/4 . . • 664, ik I 59 is' ..i sir s EI 4. ; : I,0. 1.,,,: of,•.•7 _ calitaluds1 I. 1 i .7_ _ , -.41 1. "'. - . t3.1.. :1 4 11. - .'" ?AM.•' it . 1 • • _ - .14 , ... . .; .: . a• . ; - ' --v.., ....a • • k • •• . . , /4, . • ft f . . t.t. td.,. .....,...:....: ;Y:fil! I. ":,...11.T.:.:- -: A ' '' ; . Bu • ,0)1111 111°410• ' N:crii- e-rVx • • .. ; • i 50 ' k I: ti ... • 1.4 •J Ralats ••j. .., za•jo. • :: ..., .•um, 60, ,% 90T.74,14 Study Area IN 12 •:_•:'...;:. • • : •-•:: .4‘.„ ,.....fr...),.. ....ter . , . e. _.ea:iits.....!..rat . ..,. :. .., ... ,......$., --...4-....4,:,........ . • . .. i .. .PI: .. r 4- :. . .,,,,1;11eVadt.l .'..... • . . ;li I 0 .....S■ ...‘,..4 .....Cr.t. p,._ .1% • a ROM •.C., N. • 3.Y. ' g : ' - ,-1t1I-E R -"." ---4"0'1.51paalde , .7704, . ... gm. ; I ,!;•••••••,.. Lip I14.11 • ......, •.• • 4,04 . i•Ilk CI.c.. -**, 't N%•••:... _. • ;Is ..." .. woo p 14• • .% . N. ... rCa 0112 . •• •• 7 P _164*-‘;‘.....2jr.i...,,,„. til. ...Co. . ... .6% ii r el.s.i 4,--'"-.---a% . .. a : • 11 ... 1 " 1 ___ Pigi ."4.1.• '.. -tis% ‘10 ' .m 6 - • I • 'I IR{ . , lc. . It... . --.. , 4.; : "I.:. . • ' • : . el*?... ' gi l .. .. , 0 i • , _ ',t, . ,/,/ ..• Tato,‘ . •.. -I- . ‘ / ,7-41jel a' .:‘,-.\•, , - 11 ,. . d 1:9 .• l'A 01. • :ilk 1 14. 'II. -....... .2 41:41.0e3C-Lii f'4.#1 ' TrZi , 1 ."` ,.....4.,• • , 1; 4., , ,....,v \\. ,st,,,,,, • , .. 1 1 atfr„ _ .., . ,,,,A. •i •1•Irti• . • ,:, liz;',; ii, i.; ',. :` :f*%,,,>. ' ,• • . . -I 1. ) . • font 1..4,1 Fs m _44\ Sorfn e • . •• • 1 .C. 1 k . ■ ••• eV:* ••:. ... 1.1;4• ‘ ,••ii . 1 • \ - : i'• - hinct • • 14 , 1 .- - • • . .N..•‘ .•:! i 41 . 4th : 1, ' .- . • *. ' •Nt % AI •. ..i. ..-.4:v.i, # ;,;.•4.,...,1 if .. 1...: .0,: • : .4_4::- . s. •••: . J.:, -.To I. Imp . .....• 1 . ,::: too_ • . • • •• .. .. PM ii. b. ,.•••*ilect il • ' 1 Cul • " li'• •• •ci 2:: • , -•i *. . • •1/4"■, 11 6.; - ..'' In hi-S2 -:.:•4•••• .7:4. .1.4• ' . 114: / • . r• '•%. • • . • ._7:1'. sr - , •e :`....",•1„,..-. '.-:- : ' ‘1,4" ' r:: '. i -1'4 ' , • s .'11,1-EA,C.\ ,/ . 1 .---N• s •11•••• .... ( I ;-• 17 ' ..i.:‘: ii ; Ir-•illif Y 1 . I,itattik"in, . \i- ) - -; 7-2.z• a- .. a r kr. A t• . ' e i."4 . 1-1. • . •' .7.?:, -:.--.**-: ');,•• 1; . ' 1 I: , sa p. - . ..,.. • • . . ! •• :•:14.113uy li . 1 •• -• ._.,..::.:-..i. ... :.•:. .1 ; • . . - f 1- ' • *1-4 - b. f . : *: • • '•-• • , - -- . 4-.`.;;;.....,..:rzoi c../ . : :. . s 1, .4:-:'" .. -IN It.:. ‘I* if :, •11 . : , c '.' :-..,- -c-i ill 7.':sIt. ‘; :?Ilic.- 9 ; 9. ' / fs. # ' - 4 4 , ...,\ \ ir I•• • • 1••• N ' : I 1 • .• .; .41 . X. 1 , t ...:. . ‘N.••• . . ■• . I. q • . e...' '''...) ...skr;. ‘.. .1 ..).... ig i 1,1ZIN. ,... .:. .......7.....:.i.! 1..'.1 ,, ' - t. vaitii 4:...011; it.); r.;. .% -..\.t,,ii Laurelwav- ,...•........ ,. .:_.A.....". . ..;,. ..-...._ ..,..._.-T 4; , .0, ‘ . , , .\. .. •••,..,‘ ; I •• 519/11 4725 Location and general topography for the City of Springfteld site in Lane County, FIGURE ■ I Oregon(USGS Springfield,OR quadrangle,courtesy of www.digitakopo- maps.com). Da- Wt> 20It- nil WA .Pailfle Habitat Senices,Inc. - PRE-Sbin-IVIiHAL W-- r-L D APR 22 2013 Wetlancd Delineation for the City of Springfield Site in Glenwood, Lane County, Oregon (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Sections 33 and 34) Prepared for City of Springfield Springfield, Oregon Prepared by Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503)570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX June 15,2011 p , ... .. � � t�.., ` R4 Yi to- �a 21' 'u9 .. 11 M1.. t. i \ft) '''' ---e 'enact". 1 71S ^n" !S Sa lN'' k - ,a 1 .r 3L f'`...".944.. 3 �'c' , -. -uC ,/�f�� ��,��Aj} � w s.�s , .fit y Y.i,• .; R £{ '4 S2.r i2,( e t, PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 222013 Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site in Glenwood, Lane County, Oregon (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Sections 33 and 34) Prepared for John Tamulonis Community Development Manager City of Springfield 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Prepared by Michele Eccleston Craig Turner Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville,,Oregon 97070 (503) 570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX PHS Project Number: 4725 June.15,2011 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 22Z013 • TABLE OF CONTENTS ee I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION._ 1 A. Landscape Setting and Land Use B. Site Alterations l C. Precipitation Data and Analysis 2 D. Methods 2 E. Description of all Wetlands and Other Non-Wetland Waters 3 F. Deviation from LWI orNWl - 3 G. Mapping Method 3 H. Additional Information 3 I. Results and Conclusions 3 J. Required Disclaimer 4 IIL REFERENCES 4 APPENDIX A: Figures Figure I: Vicinity Map(USGS) Figure 2: Tax Lot Map Figure 3: Local Wetland Inventory Map - Figure.4: Soil Survey Map Figure 5: Recent Aerial Photograph. Figure 6: Wetland Delineation Map APPENDIX B: Wetland Delineation Data Sheets APPENDIX C: Site Photos APPENDIX Di Wetland Definitions, Methodology(client only) PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 , ' , • • I: INTRODUCTION Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PHS)delineated the limits of potentially jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the State/U.S: for the City of Springfield site in Glenwood, Lane County, Oregon (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Section 33,tax lots 100,200,and Section 34,tax lots 500 and 700). This report presents the results of PHS's wetland delineation within the study area. Figures, • including a map depicting the location of wetlands within the study area, are located in . - Appendix A. Data sheets documenting on-site conditions are provided in Appendix B. Ground- level photos of the site are located in Appendix C. A discussion of the wetland delineation methodology(for the client) is provided in Appendix D. IL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Landscape Setting and Land Use The site is comprised of four tax lots located south of Glenwood Boulevard and east of Interstate 5.Tax lots 100,200, and 500 are owned by the City of Springfield and tax lot 700 is privately owned. PHS identified potentially jurisdictional wetland along the western and southern portion of tax lot 200 and the southern portions of tax lots 100, 500,and 700.The adjacent land use around the site is commercial and industrial. Tax lot 200 is undeveloped with a palustrine forested/open water wetland and upland forest.The northern half of tax lot 100 is,a construction job site and staging area for the Interstate 5 bridge work. It consists of gravel fill and portable job trailers.The southern half is undeveloped,with an, upland forest dominated by red alder(Alms rubra),red elderberry (Sambucusracemosa),. Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor),cow parsnip(Heracleum maximum),Robert's geranium (Geranium roberiiana),and prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola).There is a small portion of wetland within and adjacent to the southtax lot boundary. Tax lot 700 consists of two houses in the northern portion of the lot,and the central and southern portions are undeveloped.The tax lot consists of mowed lawn and ornamental landscape plants with a forested wetland dominated by black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpus) along the southern portion. Tax lot 500 is an undeveloped lot.The north and central portions of the site consist of black cottonwood,plantago(Plantago latifolia),tall fescue(Fes/uca arundinacea), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carola),Canada thistle(Cirsiuin arvense),and teasel (Dipsacus sylverstris). There is a gentle slope along the western and southern portion of the site dominated by English ivy (Hedera helix)and Himalayan blackberry. A forested wetland is located at the bottom of the slope in the southwestern portion of the tax lot. B. Site Alterations PHS did not observe any site alterations at the time of the site visit. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PHS N 4725 APR 2 2 2013 Pacific I labile(Services;Inc. Page I • • • C Precipitation Data and Analysis There is no weather station where the site is located in Glenwood, Oregon. As such, weather information in the City of Eugene, located approximately 1 mile west of the site,was used for comparison and precipitation analysis. Recorded precipitation for the City of Eugene totaled 0.90 inches for the two weeks prior to PHS's May 10,2011, wetland delineation field work and data collection. On the day of the delineation, there was no rainfall.Total observed precipitation for the waver year(October 1,2010 through May 10,201 1)was 35.36 inches,which is approximately 79 percent of normal. Table I compares the average monthly precipitation to the recorded monthly precipitation in the City of Eugene,as well as to the normal precipitation range,as identified in the NRCS WETS Table for the Eugene WSO Airport. As shown in Table 1, recorded precipitation for the month of February was below normal but within the normal range. The recorded precipitation for the months of March and April were above normal but within the normal range. Since the rainfall two months prior was within the normal range, it is PI-IS's best professional judgment(BPJ)that "normal'circumstances"were present at the time of the wetland delineation.field work. Table 1: Comparison of Average and Observed Precipitation at the City of Eugene weather station and Eugene WSO Airport WETS Table for the Three Months Prior to the May 2011 Wetland Delineation 30%Chance Will Have . Observed Percent of Month Average t Less Than More Than i Precipitation, . r , r . Precipitation Normal_- ::Average ,Average,+. February 6.35 4.24 7.60 4.91 . 77% March. 5.80 4.13 6.87 6.24 108% April 3.66 2.30 4.42 .3.78' 103% Notes: I. Source:NRCS WETS Table for the Eugene\VSO Airport (htip:/h ilw.i ce.ores.usda.gov/npref/support/climatcAvetWnds/or/41039.1xp 2. Source:National Weather Sent for the City of Eugene Otai+:/Awww.0 feathcieoh/climnre/indez.php?wfoTnr) D. Methods PHS delineated the limits of the wetlands on the site based on the presence of wetland hydrology, hydric soils,and hydrophytic vegetation, in accordance with the Routine On-site Determination, as described in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1 ("The 1987 Manual")and the Regional Supplement toihe Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. PHS conducted the wetland delineation and data collection on May 10,2011.The delineation of Wetland A was based on the presence of hydric soil indicators within the top 10 inches of the surface,hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology indicators such as saturation,water stained leaves,and geomorphic position. PRE-SUBMITTAL REG'D APR 2 2 2013 Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI'S f/'4725 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Page 2 • • E. Description of all Wetlands and Other Non-Wetland Waters PHS identified the limits of one wetland within the study area. A description of the wetland is provided below. Wetland A Wetland A is located at the bottom of a slope between residential and commercial properties. The wetland continues offsite,but the onsite portion is 17,453 square feet/0.40 acre.The Cowardin classification is Palustrine Forested (PFO), and the HGM classification is Slope.The sources of hydrology appear to be stormwater, precipitation and groundwater. The portion of Wetland A delineated on tax lot 200 is dominated by Pacific willow(Salix lasiandra)and red osier dogwood(Corn us stolonifera).There were also several inches of ponded water at the time of the delineation. The portion of Wetland A on tax lots 100,500 and 700 is forested and consists of black cottonwood, Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), and slough sedge(Carex obnupta)(as characterized by Sample Points 3,4,and 5). The adjacent upland vegetation(as characterized by Sample Points 1,2,and 6)includes red alder,Himalayan blackberry,English ivy,poison hemlock(Coniunt maculatwn),prickly lettuce, selfheal (Prunella vulgaris),and creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). PHS based the delineation on the presence of saturation within 12 inches of the soil surface, hydric soil and hydrophytic vegetation,which coincided with,low spots in the topography. F. Deviation from LWI or NWI PHS reviewed the 2010 Local Wetland Inventory(LWI) map for the Glenwood Area of Springfield.The LWI map identifies the wetland delineated on the site as GS-2. The wetland mapped on the LWI is slightly larger than what PFIS delineated in the field.This is likely because the delineated wetland boundaries were surveyed with sub-centimeter accuracy as compared to drawing the boundary on a larger scale map with an accuracy of+/-25 feet. G. Mapping Method PHS flagged the boundaries of the wetlands with blue surveyor's tape. Data points were flagged with lime green surveyor's tape. The wetland flagging and sample points were survey-located by the City of Springfield.The estimated accuracy of the survey is sub-centimeter. H. Additional Information None. • • I. Results and Conclusions PHS identified one potentially jurisdictional wetland within the study area.The total area of wetland is approximately 0.40 acre within the site.The wetland has a Cowardin Class of Palustrine Forested(PFO)and an HGM Classification of Slope.The wetland continues off site to the east,west and south of the study area. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI IS#4725 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. APR 2 2 2013 Page J. Required Disclaimer This report documents the investigation,best professional judgment and conclusions of the investigators. It is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge, It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination of wetlands and other waters and used at your own risk unless it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Oregon Department of State Lands in accordance with OAR 141-090-0005 through 141-090-0055. III. REFERENCES Adamus, P.R. and D. Field.2001 Guidebook for Hydrogeomorphic(HGM)-based Assessment of Oregon Wetland and Riparian Sites. Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Riverine Impounding and Slopes/Flats Subclasses. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem, OR. Hitchcock, CL and A.Cronquist. 1973.Flora of the Pacific Northwest:An,Illustrated manual. University of Washington Press. Munsell Color,2000.Munsell Soil Color Charts. Gretag-Macbeth,New Windsor,New York. National Resource Conservation Service Eugene WSO Airport WETS table for Lane County. http://wtiw.wcc.nres.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wetland's/or/4'1039.txt National Weather Service Climate Data htrp•//wnm weather.gov/cdimaie/indes.nlrp?wfor-mir NRCS Web Soil Survey,2011.Online Mapping for Lane County,Oregon. Oregon Department of State Lands. September 2001.Removal-Fill Lain (ORS 196.800-196.990) and Removal and Filling in Scenic Water ways(ORS 390.805-390.925). ORMAP.org tax maps. 2011. httpr//wwiv.ormap.org/ Pacific Habitat Services, Inc.2010. City of Springfield, Glenwood Area Local Wetlands Inventory map. Reed, Porter B.,Jr., 1988.National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:Northwest (Region 9). Prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife Service,St. Petersburg, FL.NERC- 88/18.37. US Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical.Report Y-87-I. U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers.2008. Interim Region!Supplement to the,Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region,ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar,and C.V.Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS: U.S.Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U.S. Geological Survey,2011,Springfield, Oregon, topographicalquadrangle. Source: www.digital-topomaps.com. PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/P115#4725 APR 2 2 2013 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Page 4 • • Appendix A Figures • rF £. ter ¢ ®..4 M �� 4 . 'f a y li + n3yfi +s 'GZ ca.. .?• • i J A�_ ., ` i' ew" � rxJ�°? 1d o y I B °i RECD APR 2 2 2013 • . S 0 • '.Y• II ' _ II..\-11i-'-w71.111' • Ibi.t - i'M \ ...r- ",,,, ..'""-,. •'-,:'.....o.00_ .. it....--' _ _ .. ., - .. - Ox )1- !I ,c � - i1-plait`1 .1 ii'4 M k. 1 i 5�1 E C All I ;1ri1- ,,.. ..-.rz - , i4I.- ': ' 141 ." '‘4 . - " / fit.. •'•• •ti 3• 1 "t- !r• 4. '+ •N }_ li• IJ • `• ..• . ' . . CIS,r Bite * �1. _.�,•r1 aaa IKJIsH 1-Ni a .1 - ,r ;, l •� no ♦P• Study Area 1 ,"'• � ..�. �t_ �! �.r � ''�` ,,v , a• rr•sl -Saone* r 1 '.t�•• 1 .. , U. . • , . . _ ..r-.. ,-, W--..., • l ` Rterr�' �" 3 '. I '•-- ray •. _�, ~�.,Istant1 , A. - 1� ,_--,, ..1 vl ',Park + . ' l ae.I. �' �� -'• r-` 1rarkr. ■p •. V,• • .r'4 iq .� e si 4 .• _,1 r"6f ratr, , • \ ,\ 'r. • Ur- • �••. .i I r Bag W V •• ' . V Paw• . ---�_ d. . • • aati '.a/ ..+. e-,...:1::-1:P. ti ..• _ F.•• (i f / P rk J l;1 '-'1.184111. ira� ` N QII%1tl 1 1 f 't{ i .41• 11,i- ,'•i I a fie'''. ' ""' ..'• .-0..All'N.; %\ .F- , i w4 ` , 1..:. .:.., ,,,, !./rip' 1,1 I 11 if •+, y" "`fir: -1 .Ic —�— •-I ', . .41, pat-IA Pat •- . ,j c•,.' oc ., .tis I 1 .£€ M 444 • Qom;,{ .sr>�s r+�1.18 444r-\• .,a k .\ S dyx. I' '.; ,1:'1•I ' . i 1�' — Inlet •1. !_ �"• \--.y...r-...... a •••..s.' rf, 44• / �t • I:: �`� •,'• ., h l`' ' v, l ,/ Ii'!1 ./? `, r.•• 1•• f• ,r• f r'a Pifk▪ •'! . .�- t s ; it _ • 4 ..I _ 'S ' ,.. , .. .. Iff, „. , :. . ,, YJ!'Lau1Cf, II. ., , ._lam_ 4' f x /3 4 .4....-=-) ,.. :. ; ... 1,; ..,:,/, - , • ;.,.• i.. ,./s % .• :••J. ...• ••.+.�• S\ :11' 1,1'i I r'. 1.• i. 1./ t t unic,aal Goll Tots! i r\ I,7 a f 4 --7 -'.7.7...- ./ ' 'I !6 b .1� .-,.:.d.,,' a y�Y` 51W11 4725 Location and general topography for the City of Springfield site in Lane County, FIGURE Oregon (USGS Springfield, OR quadrangle,courtesy of www.digital-topo- I 1;11 maps.com). D[ ���p�� �[ 'r:,.. v• 21 —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. P1E�U�BMITtAL -C D APR 2 2 2013 • • ■ N >} t.-- -4' s u R i u t Y 4 g a a y ceu ri ll MlN M 2I 22S AA� ! I Bs j -- ---- -. L J .-.ktw - Y ; ^-fir 0 • j 1 t 1 1 � . (4/ '4 4..y I 1 .f �i1llU1 '�ll 1 $ 1 / �-.,,.. ; i y err" ��4! Cn Or li i t y 'r -/5r '+s. - o I CD k .4.1 .1 - . ' T ■ / V...„„...)•>S. . ,..11/,', //-1% ,..- ...- AYM33111 `;a cL �Yd +� .- ..--. i I' J 1 + `x , ? / " ' ' T a I . .. I .:i jp"'' II CD CO En 1 __7At _ A1]IAY3Ala 1 Ca i = —�— Q, ! :_ Y ± .� 0 is av›. 't J ca a3 to+ ') wwwuwnwt O 0 mi r'_1 J 0 , to cp � ; :y 1 - 2 W I PRE-SUBMITTAL REr r CD "' APR 22 ''- • 0 Lri N •ti..:r C4 C If u t 0 C3 B M .r�MNarw n J a o C 0 S r a M Ir co 1 ,t I. 1I o. al \\ Fs 1 o S :` +I 11 11 = A ! t - , 77— . 0* . • I 4.i i• I ■-.0; / a) CO N f g C � 1 , f • g t / / N::: z i co En i 4 + 0Q. to RI CU • MR RN mom O U J d f0 I— W Ce CC) PRE-SUBMIT1 EL; "' ! 0 Glenwood LWI Map (A-1 ) 111M.1 ennui/{ Sl'I IglI,L1I(]R a, f Study Area A i 1 . GS-1 rw 1 65'3 aGS 3 r . GS•4 \ 3 +• t GS4 • Lam `4 fa Soften OaYop• a.e r . ■ ie... • T...,0.... ..e.►v Went - - ^ww rrrw S . 4.1i w ...�w..ry R' ` y Curdle Ch AWk.Ilon ✓ __ PN , .'i{MAC oftwpapaim 910.01 pr Vr Mal. 1 m.1,4111.14.,Imes 1.3....A.'"'. ...,, ' S11oe1 2•Glonwood Area of Springliald local Won ands Invun101y aawnwa4 e. l.r.w..wr.r...*.40 w•.-y Nflt ...r-...r.n.m.4S 4'.,1..... I MO 204 fool ► s+w+^e: e.....Ma a. Y T.l .vq..oiV.MMWM+w►.r .•••••r n..e....Y r•.Y�.r ip..wwy .++. Mwr a;...� '�..___.—..•0�� i - - ---- --t •1.0.ly•vlriZM.•4.rnrrrMram IV*.r/..«.1•1Irrlr,eW4 —.s+" --.... 0 750 590 1 1 .r.«1rd4.IVMY►^M MHµM/4*".LMr01001rY✓{.d.l0-. mow"... --•....1!� 4725 5191/11 wHV.w•,Crm✓f....•.M -.Yr.�.+.i. Local Wetlands Inventory of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon FIGURE (City of Springfield, Glenwood Area LWI, 2010). 3 (rim . 11 a —Pacific Habitat Services.Inc. i1 41 R APR 2 2 201 0 0 N r7} ll r----d- t 1 X C g o .4 — ' . 5 -.7-7/X . \ . — 1-rT. -L‘-1 1 73 0 ur, .... _____ "C7 (.4 ti ,•, o b 43 s i 1 ■ IT .� >. t. ■■ ;"'N w m $ _ ; ci • .r ii4\\\ o E 5::. Ilil s Air L u • -+ —~1.L — O CI CO • t_ D h' q 1r I j4 't ( 0 C O QS CO .i ' � i�i I Z"° e • 1 ! ' In , V ' f Z y 1 y Z 1 _ ;1 is q�q .*: or III Tr4---7- A _,, ...11-1,.. .. 11 eliiii 7 .---,.-A--.1.-A.L. 4 C.) Z ...p /:/ 1 t f t 1 , 1 U R i' , !'F�� r _3 CO / S -' +� a> • - 1../ i -....Tr:= .. - ,,,,L - v . elf. 4 - - _ ..0 .. co 0 _.;_if . __ , - -::571.- • K O Iii IV hi s ..;. il I'/' /4 .'Ai. II a co ii -=4�K z Q V) CS . .-., •..,tt aZ.na A•:n.i 6U,:.r ..4.-4 11.:r► ■ 'F* a<Ntt• 061.57! OW LIP w. Y 4 w Ce giZt T-. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'[ i • ,re) 7,7 _ • 0 . ol,... . 11411 3 (Study Area �' .. jaf L-= 4 E. Ir / / , II s i ry, r. a i , i iil, 7,,,,c,:, - . .. . ii 1,\ 1 ' 4 e.,.; J. . , „.. \ . t k 11/1/ '' ''' ' . . r • \ . ' ,'tip.. 11 1 F; ■ lowiti d '1 /� :7 it r.a a •. 't* "hip. ( I( k I a: ' , ' ■ \ IL'„ r 4. t NI.: 1"1111,1,. i - 111 5/9111 4725 Recent Aerial Photograph for the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon FIGURE (GoogleEarth,2005). 5 ::.__4. —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. APR 2 2 201:, • •. . , -----" ) .., ) ‘ ,,,.. \' i ,i.?„ -:- tr,, ‘.'' .. ......... ,......_ J .,„________, .... ____ . , ...., ., _ r' �� `; 11 / ,�-- . ,.•,. , , _ JO I ��� 0 F Ls L1 L. f i`f" a C f , )1 8, ! .... ., a) �\ ;, ` 1 ° o E r ,r ) E v ,:�\\,‘\ p — ,' o c sM V •� �� ; O O � � y o I I ` ('c' °• C � \ ...."--..i 1 �o1M }Jy �i _ 0• U .1'k 1 r v. , U •' l'i\ \• Nlr� � QD l ',',,\:"9,C\\--::\.-.• k - - ‘1,} f ` 1 j S M 4 `°i, a o 0 ig ...,..," t r---ii‘\ °I (is jr1 7t — tli / i'.. S\ $ r' O O • �- ;ts \\ vl Zi ' �I U r7 c c . I c to d ,.-, ' ri i ,__1,\-'1" ' 1 \\.g1/, •1 1 �ti,� • -4'.,./ / 1 -•V l `\, 3A'„ ___1\ \ ..1-0,..., :c ) 1.. \i,;:ilt f ,/......n...\. 4.: \ , 1 1.. ;1 , ____:____ _„...../....:: ___ .:. \k ;Pt ' � �;4, s aFj,,s,a \ .14. W.%. \, ( )j F .1 C. � pp -StJB l i i ICU,. !<l..10 APR 2 2 2013 • Appendix B Wetland Determination Data Sheets . ° -,R �,• "� p 4 'ohs^ c. F� ur � _ 1'aw:. .i . '": r, 1i�zi if µ �4J 5 6 S .y,' f { .1 �y�G.- 5 �] y �.... 414 - �°' e u aHrlisAA4 .;i d t siAti;" R 1 `� A.N . d3t?` - ,;, �. 6 ,! e' t ? PRE-SUBMI,ITAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • FRS 4725 • WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Projecusite: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lena Sampling Date: 5/1012011 Applicant/Owner:. City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 1 Investigator(s): M EcclestonIC Tumor Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(htlslope,terrace,etc.:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let: 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: OD. Soil Map Unit Name: Newberg-Urban Land Complex MM Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (a no,explain in Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances'present? (VW) Y Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Area within Hydro Soil Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No X Weiland Hydrology Present?• Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover, Species? Status. Tree Stratum (plot size: 3e ) _ Number of Dominant Spades 1. Alnusrubra, 20 X' FAC That are OBL;FACW or FAC: 2 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Domino( 4 Spades Across Ae Strata:. 2 (8) 20 a Total Cover Seulino/Shrub Stratum (plot sire: _) Percent of Dominant Spades 1 That ere OBL,FACW. or FAC: i 100% (NB) 2 _ 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Malady by:. 5 OBL Spades x 1= 0 0 =Total Cover FACW species a 2=, 0 FAC Species. x3= 0 Herb Stratum (pot size: 6 ) FACU Species x 4. 6 1 Gellum sparkle 5 FACU UPL Species x 5= 0 2 Conlum maculafum. • 40 X FAC Column Totals 0' (A) 0 (B) 3 Lactuca sorrlola 10 FACU 4 Solanum dulcemara 3 FAC Prevalence Index=B/Aiii #DIV101 6 Lamlum amploxlcaule 2 UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 77 I-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6 X 2-.Dominance Test is>50% 60 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is s 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting YV odv Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Welland Non-Vascular Plants' _2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) • 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless . . disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 20 Vegetation Yob X No Present? Remarks: PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD • APR 222015 • • SOIL PHS a 4725 Sampling Point: 1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Lee Texture. Remarks, 0-15 10YR 312 100 Silt Loam Rocks mid bricks in soil profile 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletlon,RM=Reduced Matrix,CSeCovered or Coated Sand Grains. 1Locatbn:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix: Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils!: Hiatosol N9 __Sandy Redox(S5) 2 art Muck(A10) HMG Eplpedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Blade Hislk(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA I) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4). _Loamy Cloyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain In Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) • Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) (S1) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Sandy Mucky Minmal 'Ines of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Cloyed Matrix(S4). Redox Depressions(F8). problematic Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None • Depth(inches): Hydric Soli Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) _Water stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89) High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 48) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 4B) - Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marls(B1) _Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water.Table(C2) Sediment Deposit*(82) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Saturation Viable on Aerial Imagery(C9) • Drift Deposits(03) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roos(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) iron Deposits(B5) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(C6) FanNeutral Test(05) Surface Sol Cracks(36). _Stunted or Stressed Plants(DI)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(Dc)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(07) _Other(Explain in Remarks). Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(Ba) Field Observations: • Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): • Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (includes asina7 Mnge), Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,pedal photos,previous Inspections).if available: None Remarks: PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD . APR 222013 • • PHS#- 4726 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: GlenwooduLane Sampling Date: 511012011' ApplicantOwner: City of Springfield. Slate: OR Sampling Point: 2 Investigator(s): M EcclestonlC Turner Section.Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 tandform(hnslope,terrace,etc:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR):: LRRA Let: 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NW Classifica0on: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes Y No (if no,explain in Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances"present? (Y/N) Y Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers In Remarks.) • SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site niapcshowing sampling point locations,traneects,important features,etc. . Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Area wIthln Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No X Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL,FACW,or MC: 1 (A) 2 3 _ __ Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across Ali Strata: _ 1 (B) o =Total Cover Saotina/Shrub Stratum (plot size: ) Percent of Dominant Spades 1 Thal are OBL,FACW, or FAC: 100% (NB) 2 3 Prevalence index Worksheet: 4 _ Total%Cover of Multiply by: 5 OBL Species x 1= 0 0 =Total Cover FACW species x2= 0 FAC Species r x 3= 0 Herb Stratum (plot size: 6 ) FACU Species _ x 4 a 0 1 Prunella vulgads 20 FACU UPI Species x5- 0 2 Hypochaeds radi=ate 3 FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 Agresti&stole:Were 80 X _ FAC ■ 4 Hyperlcum perforatum 2 UPL Prevalence Index=8/A= #DIV/01 5 Carex sp. _ 6 (FAC). "0 So/anum dulcamara 2 MC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 ." I-Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation. 8 _ _. _ X 2-Dominance Test is>SO% 112. =Total Cover 3-Prevalence lode.*is 4 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide sapping Woody Vine Stratum (plot s&e: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed'er problematic. Hydrophytic. %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Vegetation Yes X No Present?' Remarks: PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • APP 2-? 7911 _ . • • SOIL PHS a 4725 ,Sampling Point:. 2 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Radox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(mist) % Tye Locr Texture. Remarks 0-8 10YR 312 100 Silty Clay Loam 8-13 10YR 212 100 Silty Clay Loam 13-17 10YR 212 100 Sandy Loam 'Type:C=Concenuati,n,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Mabx,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils Hictosol(Al) Sandy Rados(S5) 2 cm Muck(MO) Hisbc Ep'ryedon(A2) _Stripped Matrix(56) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Hislic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Mauls(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(M2) _Radox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 11Miceuxs must st bap present vegetation Se On andrbed or .of hydrology must be present unless disturbed or Sandy Cloyed Matrix(54) _Rados Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None Depth(Inches): - Hydric Soil Present? Yea No X Reeks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) _Water stained Leaves(09)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89) High Water Table(A2) 12,4A,and 48) (Except MLRA7,2,4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(611) Drainage Patterns(810) Water Marks(BI) _Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82)" _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(03) Iron Deposits(B5) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(CB) Fac-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Sod Cracks(B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(06)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(Be) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches), . Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (inducescapaay'nape). Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if amiable: None PRE-SI IRMIflA PE( :'D Remarks: APR 2 2 2013 • • • PHS it 4725 . WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region ProjecVSite: City of Springfield City/County: GlenwoodfLane Sampling Date: 5/1012011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 3 Invesugator(s): M Eccieston/C Tumor Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landhxm(bllsiope,terrace,etc.:) Terrace, Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: .Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NW Classification: Are ctlmaticmydroioglc conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (it no.explain In Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? (YIN) Y Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transecte,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes' X No Is Sampled Area within Hyerie Soil Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No. Wetland Hydrology Present?' Yes X No . Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dombient, Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover. Species? Status, Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 Thal are OBI_FACW,or FAC: . I (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 _ Species Across Strata:_ 1 (B) 0 =Total Cover Sadinu5hrub stratum (plot sire: ) Percent of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL.FACW,,or FAC: 100% (NB) 2 3 - - Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by: 5 _ OBL Species x l a 0 0 =Total Cover FACW species x 2= 0 FAC Species x3= 0 Mora Stratum (plot sire: 6 ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 Carex obnupta 50 X OBL UPL Species x 5= 0 2 Prumella vulgads 20 FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (8) 3 Fraxlnus latllolia 10 FACW 4 Solanum dulcamara 2 FAC Prevaience Index=B/A= #DIWOI 5 Carex sp. 20 (FAC) - 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 7 ,1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5 X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 102 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index Is 53.00 4-Morphological Adaptations(provide supporting.. Vtbodyyittafigum (piot size: _) . data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plans' 2 ' Problematic HYdrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydrit sot and wetland hydrology must be present,unless. disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground In Herb Stratum Vegetation ' Yes X No Present? • pArp (l� {{�� IAL 1/� Remarks: 1 RE-SUfYIII IAL IC-CDD • APR 2 2 201' IIII III SOIL x145 a 4725 . Sampling Point: 3 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % .Color(moist) % Type' Loc.' Texture Remarks 0.4 10YR 312 80 t 0YR 4/4 10 C M Silt Loam _ 10YR 311 10 R M 4-18 10YR412 86 7.5YR414 15 C M Sandy Loam Type:Cnconcenbabon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Cowned or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore union, M=Matrix. - - - . :_ Hydric Soil indicators:(Applicable to all LRRe,unless otherwise noted.), Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sollse: Histosol(A1) _Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10) Hiatic Epjpedon(A2) Sbipped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Slick Ittk:(A3) _.Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(ercept MLM 1) Very Shallovi Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Depicted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicator°of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S7) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) __Redox Depressions(Fe) problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present):: Type: None Depth(irlchesp _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Niter(At) X Water stained Leaves(89)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89). High Water Table(A2), 1.2,4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 4B) X Saturation(A3) �_Salt Crust(B11) Drainage Patterns(610) Water Marks(B1), _Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(62) _Hydrogen Su fiide Odor(Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) ___Oxidized Rldrospheres along living Roots(C3) X- Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(84) _Preserx:e of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aqultard(D3) Iron Deposits(85) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Sofa(C6) X Fac-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soil Cracks(86) Shorted or Stressed Plants(31)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) Other(Eirplain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) X 'Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B6) Field Observations: • Surface Water Present? Yes NO X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(ochesk >18 . Wetland Hydrology Present? Sature0on Present? Yes X. No. Depth(inchesk 8 Yes X No preludes ceeina7 range) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well aerial photos,previous inspections),it available: None Remarks: - -- : - PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 • • PHSO 4726 WETLAND DETERMINATION,DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and.Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Land Sampling Date:' 611012011' Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 4 Investigator(s): M EcclestonlC Tumor Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West Section 34 Landfonn(Nislope,terrace:eta.:) Slope Local relief(concave.convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let 44.04332 Long:. 123.04697 Datum: DO Soil Map Unit Name: .Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NWI Classification: We dimaWhydrologlcconditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (d no.explain In Remarks) Are vegetation_ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances-present? (Y/N) Y Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? II needed,eiplaln any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,:transects,Important features,etc.. : Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes. X No is Sampled Area within Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No Welland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. .. absolute Dominant .Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status. Tree Stiatum (plot size: 30 ) Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxlnus lalifolia, 30 X' FACW That are OBL,FACW.or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Anon AD Strata: 1 (B) 30 =Total Cover. Saotmo/Shrub Stratum. (plot size: ) Portent of Dominant Spaces 1 That are OBL,FACW. or FAC: 100% (NB) 2 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Coverof Multiply by: 5 OBL Species xt=x1= 0 0 a Total Cover FACW species x 2=' 0 FAC Spades x3= 0 limb Stratum (Plot size: ) FACU Species x4= 0 1. UPL Species' _ x 5= 0 2 Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 4 Prevalence Index=81A= . BDIV/01 5 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydiuphytic Vegetation B X 2-Dominance Test is>50%. 0 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence index is s 3.01 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Nbodv Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 - - 'Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)• 0 a Total Cover 'Indicators of hydde soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless .., disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic 16 Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 70. Vegetation Yes X ' f I No RECDPresent? 1 kE-SUY11Y�111/9� f`ECjt� Remarks: APR 2 2 2013 • • SOIL PH81 4725 Sampling Point:. 4 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators,) Depth Matrix Rados Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/1 50 10YR 314 50 C M Slit Loam 6-17 10YR 411 60 10YR 314 50 C M Silty Clay Loam 'Type:C=Concentretion,D=Depletiun,RM=Reduced Matrix.CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PLppore Lining, M=Metru. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise-noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol(Al) _Sandy Rados(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10) HIMIc Epipedon(A2) _Shipped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Ristic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)except URA I) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain In Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Rodox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Yndkeron of hydtophytic vepeseorrand wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy payed Matrix(S4) _Rados Depressions(Fe) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If-present): Type: None Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(Al) X Water stabled Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(Be) X High Water Table(A2): 1,2,4A,and 49) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 45) X .Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(511) Drainage Patterris(B10) Water Marks(Al) Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(CO) Drift Deposits(83) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(Cl) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(95) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Goes(C6) Fec Neutral Test(05) Surface Soe Cracks(BB) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(DI)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(DB)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain In Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88): Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): . Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(kKhes): 0 Yes X No (kxludes csplary binge) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring wall,aerial photos,previous inspections),B available: None Rix '- • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • APR 2 2 2013 • • • PHS S 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM'-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane' Sampling Date: 5/1012011 Applicant/O,mer. City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point 5 Investigator(s): M Eccleston(C Tumer Section.Township.Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landrum%(billslope,terrace,etc.:) Terrace Local relief(concave;convex,none): Slope(% Subregion(LRR): LRRA Lat 44.04392 . Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NW Classifseation:. Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?- Yes V No (If no.explain In Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are"tonal Circumstances-present? (Y/N) V Are vegetation _ Soil_ or Hydrology _naturally problematic? if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations;transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yea X No is Sampled Area within Hydric Soil Present?. Yes X No a Wetland? Yea X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .X• No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Speclee? Status. Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 ) Number of Dominant Species 1 Populus trichocaipa 75 X, FAC That are OBL FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 7 Total Number of Dominant 4 _ Species Across Ai Strata: 2. (Et) 75 -Total Cover SaollnolShrub Stratum. (plot size: 6 ) Percent of Dominant Species 1 Ffaxinus latilolle 30 X FACW That are OBL FACW, or MC: 100% (NB) 2 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet 4 Total%Cover of Mudliplyby: 5 OBL Species x1= ' 0 . 30 -Total Cover FACWSpedes x2= 0 FAC'Species. x3- 0 Herb Stratum (Plot site: ) FACU Species x4• 0 . . 1 UPI Species x 5- 0 2 Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 4 - Prevalence Index=8/A= 0DIV101 5 6 _ _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:, 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8 X 2-Dominance Test is>50% . O -Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index isi 3.0' • 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting yttiody Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain) O -Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric aoi and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.. . Hydrophytic %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Vegetation Yes X No. • Present? PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Remarks: ' APR 2 2 2013 , • . SOIL PHS 0 4725 Sampling Point: 5 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features. (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) %- Type' the Texture• Remarks 0-4 10YR 312 100 Silt Loam 4-18 10YR 312 80 7.6YR 414 20 C M Silt Loam I 'Type:Cr-Concentration.D=Depleaan,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grams. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Hislosol(Al) __Sandy Redox(S5) 2 an Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Stripped Matrix(SS) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(Flitexwpt"(LRAM Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(M) _Loamy Cloyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ^Ckalaro of hydrophylic vegetation end wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy they'd Matrix(S4) _Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yee X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(At) X Water stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA X Water stained Leaves(Be) High Water Table(AZ) 1,2,4A,and 48) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) __Sall Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(BID) Water Marls(B1) _Aquatic Invertebrates(1313) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Ct) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) ' Algal Mat or Crust(84) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(85) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Sails(C6) X Fee-Neutral Test(05) Surface Sol Cracks(86) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(36)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations:. • Surface Waer Present? Yes No X Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >18 Wetland Hydrology Present? . Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >18 Yes X No (includes ceplary fringe) Desaibe Recorded Data(stream gauge,mandating well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if eve/able: None Remarks:.:.:. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 201 1 •, 1 • . • • PHS Y 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATIO N DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region ProjectSite:. City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 5110/2011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 6 Investigatods): M Eccleston/C Tumor Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Lendform Millstone,terrace,etc.:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex.none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA. Let 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NW Classification: Are dimaticmydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (t no.explain In Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are`Normal Circumstances'present? (YIN) Y Are vegetation _ Soil_ of Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is Sampled Area within Hydro Soft Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No' X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute. Dominant indicator Dominance Testworksheet: %cover Species? , Status Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL FACW.or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 _ Species Across Aft Strata:. 3 (B) 0 =Total Cover Seoli,m/Shmb St atum (plot size: 6' )- Percent of Donimaot Spades 1 Crafaegue douglasil 5 X FAC That are OBL.FACW. or FAC: 33% (NB) 2 Rubus discolor 15 X • FACU 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 _ Total%Cover of Midliply by: 5 . _ OBL Species x1.= 0 20 =Total Cover FACW species x2s 0 FAC Species x 3= - 0 Hem Stratum (plot size: 6 ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 Hedere helix 70 X UPL UPL Species x 5= 0 2 Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 4 Prevalence Index=B/A= 001V/el' 5 g . Hydrophytic Vegetation Indica tors: .' 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8 _ 2-Dominance Testis>5015 • 70 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index Is s 3.O1 4-Morphological Adaptations(provide supporting Woody Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ( 5-Wetland Non-Vasctdar Plants' 2 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain). 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hyddc soi and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground In Hem Stratum 10 Vegetation Yes No X • • Present? Remarks: - .. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APP, 2 2201? SOIL PHS 0 4725 Sampling Point: 6 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicator..) Depth Matrix' Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Lee Texture Remarks 0-11 10YR 313 100 Silt Loam 11-17 10YR 313 100 Silty Clay Loam 'Type:C=Concenkation,0.Depfetion,RM=Reduced Matrix.CS--Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Locatiom PL•Pore lining. M=Matri. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic coined=(A2) _Stripped Matrix(S8) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black rustic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(Weser MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain In Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Dark Surface(F8) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicates or liydrophytic vegetation and wetland Y hydrology must be present.urdess disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(54) _Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. •Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None, Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks.' HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) Water stained Leaves(89)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(89), High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 48) Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(310) Water Marks(81) Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) Hydrogen SWrde Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Ngal Mat or Crust(84) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) bon Deposits(85) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(C6) Fac-Neutral Test(D5)• Surface Soil Cracks(BB) _Stunted cc Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A). Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Malice Aerial Imagery(87) _Omer(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Peasant? yes. No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (includeacapllary cringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge.monitoring well aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: None Remarks: • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 0 r Appendix C Site Photos I, . :. . p H s a .. y , . ,. . , , , _ . ,. , , , , f _ ,, , ° ., . , . , , . J ti> PRE:SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 . 0 0 ...� .r 'S' nom. V''' •` .91. ' .:711.7.. r ` },•. • 1 . , ' .,+f . .. ; r_ �•� - Photo A * ; 1_ :' -kK-" _ •,411 Photo was taken looking .. 4 •• .4ti ,-... • j, southwest at the ponded ;:,.44r r;or s i?' `,,pe'. portion of Wetland A.•• t . . ... t. t •,.,,. \'' •'r g'il•A• ' Y .T ''' •1' t. , 4-1. b sly: ,.' . ' r' •:1. Photo B `•+--. 1 I *+' # , r „, 34'r +1' t . Photo was taken looking ..� 5. „ "i t '' 1• northwest al the ponded , .,- 'S , - • • .. 1.•*'t. ., [0140,.}. i '. portion of Wetland A. •• 1 ?. _ ; . : 'di '4' ki if * ! ' J)" ' ;+t• ti 4(44 . , via:.,',./ii,,,,..:,,, , .,,e-,t,-i.-ii::s.:;:::.4- 4, :.;-:,, . .."::;. t, ..- . , It . 1 .' \ • ! ` ..\ .r Project#4725 6/2/2011 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon, Photos taken on May 10, 2011, PRE-SUBMITTAL RE 1 I.1 —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. APR 2 2 (U13 . •e 0 0 , h- • ' • 1. i r , .; - = ,: Photo C },y' J r ,i `- 4',.1.., it, .�I r_ • ;r:: Photo was taken looking "*Ii. ... .r ,.:' `� iN. ,, ' 1; 4P' .... west at Wetland A. 't ;. .G .4 - i,. f l y ( i di„ k." ';., _ '. ,•p,. , i • s-. 1 ' ''' iF�' y• 1 ! T wPr.. • . • 'v: Photo D Photo taken looking north t.at the mowed lawn area, j *f.. ti located north of Wetland ` . '' w la.-- ks+Aar. Protect#1125 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane Count Ore on:A#�otos; 62120„ Y Y, g I'HAL RE a on May 10, 2011. u � APR 2 2 2013 ,`�l� —Pacific Itahitat Services,Inc. • # , o 4 '• ., ;. 1. cri r 1 os .1 ,j ., Photo E v.• `++ . •p •" •" n �r1 Photo was taken looking •��.� r r ` .^ •1•. 1 �li • .r ��;. east at the forested portion•Afit `. �:- (,y ,<•r� ,4: '.. . c• , of Wetland A.• „ 4' X11' ,1, ). ', ” ' ,;R • .' mow• ¢. ...y.• i--- ...Volt"' - Milk .lye Viiii- Photo F .Y ► l� wit j ' ,�',. ' . ;_ '... Photo was taken looking 1 ',r f 1:1°1 t[ ' jfil Ni.:.l' 1,1 ,• . ! 'south al the forested , 0 .4411 4 , 1 t '� portion of Wetland A. fl'. "'iif t2 v.' �� ;. - ;' b. 1t�i�,, % :y "'.r;' ,,• *: • f' ► is r.. r i 1 dill 41i C J kj t f i r;: ` 1 ...' `ti .: `, 1, ty 4-.. ' il a rN — - :' r n In .AIA • ~ i /' �k �H 011 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken 612120ti Y YI 9 on May 10, 2011. PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD ,., —Pacific habitat Services,Inc. APR 2 2 2013 a . 0 0 . , • . .- ... . • ' ' . . ...,. .. .,t ... . . ..,......, $ ."OP, . • Photo G - . . .'14 ) ... . ":''' 1-, . - Photo was taken looking ' . 1' , ,L ...1 0. t '1* -' ' k 41' 1 ( • e' '. .. northeast al tax lot 500. '101",11111r1 . • , • , . . . . , • . . . , ' . . _ . - . • ,-f' . ,. • . s • * - . . , . • 4. ' ,•.1 ' • '' ..rtV 414.'''' ''''. ' . ' . ; .,— — r %, Photo H --1, ,.....", ' ,...; et,, /.1 -; - r-.1.-#.6- . - '..ei < 7' -4. ,.• le.4, et . 6,.,,. i- it.. .. ., , • — • - . ..itt. ilk • .' ''.: r:1 4a, 4' tk:4P.':(1)■• ' ',. .•i Photo taken looking west > - --" . - s "/ * Iv 1 fiC ' , .r-iitta.‘ .. '-ir'..1k,.. 4:4, ,,,, .„ ;,■ at Wetland A. .--,-, I 0 .„04 .t t i. 01,W..11...: • N.. 4-\ ", •,:, . ' ..:'' -.7Z .',1 , it " . .. . • : - ....ird. 1‘,.,*• . i , oil. • .o:— tof ,. • ... 7 1.,,r * 444. ....44 IL 1 I 4 'Xi 1 fl:-,e '1 ''' . ''' . ' ' . • .V‘ it'. L. Of 4.. . ,1 je. ,,111' •,. i 4 ii:• 1 -',;,... . '•' 4, An. ... • 4. .f —''; - • . ' ' . a. ' . ,• - . ;:.'" . r.....• ••. . , . ,.. •••,.. - • . . .. . L ,.) • . , ,. -.-, •. A .., r. . .. . • .-- . . ,.,,.a „...,__.4._:...r.-7 ... . , .. . a-sfa.,,,,:: ' .- 2... ..••,.....,....... . 4 ” - ..,-A...,'„ _ ;1:1111,1" . ". .6 -.•• ,.. .j...01" `... *". :44—• -- . : - '' )1' •ni '-**".. . l'' '.4.-f'::•■-.. , . , -: . 01: 4( . _ ..., - 0, 5.,--40 ' - .'-'''.---';--.40, . --ilk ""`•' .,. a.. .P,...:-.4'.,•,- „•.::' ,, , b. .-r —1;'''' . . . . ..2... • •-..f. --;--_-4 _ , Project#4725 612/2011 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken on May 10, 2011. .,...,, ,,.. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC D !, ji .., —I'ncific Habitat Services, Inc. I , . , a • • Appendix I1; Wetland Definitions, Methodology r_----- P H S , r. i _ .. • re-"' M1.. �,, ' ° IPRkSUBMI PRE-SUBMITTAL RE 'D APR s-2 2 2013 • • WATERS OF THE STATE AND WETLAND DEFINITION AND CRITERIA Regulatory Jurisdiction Wetlands and water resources in Oregon are regulated by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) under the Removal-Fill Law(ORS 196.800-196.990) and by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The primary source documents for wetland delineations within Oregon is the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-I (Environmental Laboratory 1987)and the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region, which are recognized by both DSL and COE. Waters of the State and Wetland Definition Waters of the State are defined as"natural waterways including all tidal and nontidal bays, intermittent streams,constantly flowing streams, lakes, wetlands and other bodies of water in this state, navigable and nonnavigable...". "Natural waterways" is further defined as waterways created naturally by geological and hydrological processes, waterways that would be natural but for human-caused disturbances(e.g. channelized or culverted streams, impounded waters, partially drained wetlands or ponds created in wetlands)..."(DSL, 2001). Wetlands are defined as"those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water • at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (DSL, 2001). Wetland Criteria Based on the above definition, three major factors characterize a wetland: hydrology,substrate, and biota. Wetland Hydrology Wetland hydrology is related to duration of saturation, frequency of saturation, and critical depth of saturation. The 1987 manual defines wetland hydrology as inundation or saturation within a major portion of the root zone(usually above 12 inches), typically for at least 12.5%of the growing season. The wetland hydrology criterion can be met, however, if saturation within the major portion of the root zone is present for only 5%of the growing season, depending on other evidence. The growing season is defined as the portion of the year when soil temperatures at 12.0 inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero (41 degrees Fahrenheit, 5 degrees Celsius), but also allows approximation from frost free days, based on air temperature. The growing season for any given site or location is determined from US Natural Resources Conservation Service, (formerly Soil Conservation Service) data and information. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Appcndis I)-Wetland Definition and Methodology Pacific Habitat Services.Inc. APR 2 2 2013 rage I • Wetland hydrologic indicators include the following: visual observation of inundation or saturation, watermarks, drift lines, sediment deposits, and/or oxidized rhizospheres with living roots. Oxidized rhizospheres are defined as yellowish-red zones around the roots and rhizomes of some plants that grow in frequently saturated soils. Other indicators of hydrology, including algal mats or crust, iron deposits, surface soil cracks, sparsely vegetated concave surface,salt crust, aquatic invertebrates, hydrogen sulfide odor, reduced iron, iron reduction in tilled soils, and stunted or stressed plants can also be used to determine the presence of wetland hydrology. Wetland Substrate(Soils) Most wetlands are characterized by hydric soils. Hydric soils are those that are ponded, flooded, or saturated for long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions. Periodic saturation of soils causes alternation of reduced and oxidized conditions, which leads to the formation of redoximorphic features(gleying and mottling). Mineral hydric soils will be either gleyed or will have bright mottles and/or low matrix chroma. The redoximorphic feature known as gley is a result of greatly reduced soil conditions, which result in a characteristic grayish, bluish or greenish soil color. The term mottling is used to describe areas of contrasting color within a soil matrix.The soil matrix is the portion of the soil layer that has the predominant color. Soils that have brightly colored mottles and a low matrix chroma are indicative of a fluctuating water table. Hydric soil indicators include: organic content of greater than 50% by volume,and/or presence of redoximorphic features and dark soil matrix, as determined by the use of a Munsell Soil Color Chart. This chart establishes the chroma, value and hue of soils based on comparison with color chips. Mineral hydric soil must meet one of the 16 definitions for hydric soil indicators, or be classified as a"problem soil" in the Interim Regional Supplement. Wetland Biota (Vegetation) Wetland biota is defined as hydrophytic vegetation. A hydrophyte is a plant species that is capable of growing in substrates that are periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of saturated soil conditions. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, have established five basic groups of vegetation based on their frequency of occurrence in wetlands. These categories, referred to as the "wetland indicator status", are as follows: obligate wetland plants (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC), facultative upland (FACU), and obligate upland (UPL).Table I gives a definition of the plant indicator codes. Table 1. Description of Wetland Plant Indicator Status Codes Indicator Code Status OBL Obligate wetland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in wetlands(>99%) FACW Facultative wetland. Estimated to occur 67-99%of the time in wetlands. FAC Facultative. Occur equally in wetlands and non-wetlands(34-66%). FACU Facultative upland. Usually occur in non-wetlands(67-99%). UPL Obligate upland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in non-wetlands(>99%). If a species is not assigned to one of the four groups described above it is assumed to be obligate upland. NI Has not yet received a wetland indicator status, but is probably not obligate upland. Appendix n—Wetland Definition and Methodology PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Page 2 APR 2 2 2013 • I" • • Observations of hydrology,soils,and vegetation, were made using the "Routine On-site" delineation method as defined in the 1987 manual and the Interim Regional Supplement for areas that were not currently in agricultural production. One-foot diameter soil pits were excavated to 20 inches and soil profiles were examined for hydric soil and wetland hydrology field indicators. In addition, a visual absolute-cover estimate of the dominant species of the plant community was performed using soil pit locations as a center of reference. Dominant plant species are based on estimates of absolute cover for herbaceous,and shrub species within a 5 foot radius of the - sample point, and basal area cover for tree and woody vine species within a 30 foot radius of the sample point. Plant species in each vegetative layer, which are estimated at less than 20%of the total cover, are not considered to be dominant. The wetland indicator status is then used to determine if there is an overall dominance (greater than 50%)of wetland or upland plant species. If less than 50%of the dominant species are hydrophytic,then the prevalence index may be used to determine if the subdominant species are hydrophytic. If the prevalence index is less than or equal to 3, hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met. During data collection,the soil profiles were examined for hydric soil and wetland hydrology field indicators. Plant species and cover were recorded. Data was recorded on standard data sheets which contain the information specified in the 1 987 Corps Manual and the Interim Regional Supplement. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Appendix 1)—Welland Definition and Methodology APR 2 2 2013 Pacific Habitat Services. Inc. Page 3 !!!!l! 11111 'i aid 1 ' ` i Y , ' �:„ ) �� /' . , i;( V1, ,O -1 '•p 1 ■ 1 ,r ^I • '4.\ .� 0 6- 4,14,1;h 7)1 1 ~R r NO ( ■ M 1 44 A 1 „,,, _. ..-,7'. .5.1?.t e- .,.. sit y r Ifs ; /:r .t 1 w M�S rf� , it -) -y f 76 ai ;.. 7 ..-.. ,.,43.,•-•: -. Ili?! . ff it, R. i r r a } ■ i•, I. 1M,9 ir'' ,s111 ,' 51 ■ r. • 11 3 t ;Sb 'y M 1'. 1 ,.T.- -r. 40.0000444. t Fr•:r:•''t t •sy 11, � Yt • 111 yYUxi1 ,k-•-z...3 t y � ,• ., \.,,,, v ?r Ir,'1 .■ d/• +j , 4 • ! '4- ! _ -- 1:4-?,-.4 -1-=- - -