The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 4/22/2013 ;City of Springfield • • SPRINGFIELD Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review 'Application;Type , '(Applicant: check one) Site Plan Review Pre-Submittal: F1 Ma'or Site Plan Modification Pre-Submittal: ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: ❑ Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ 'Required Project Information (Applicant complete this section) A• •licant Name:Alpesh Patel phone:541-544-8440 Com •an :ALKOInvestments Email: alpatel9 @gmail.com Address: 1857 Franklin Blvd, Eugene, OR 97403 A A. •licant's Re..: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI, Principal phone:541-6864540 Corn •an :Schirmer Satre Group Email: rick @schirmersatre.com Address: 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 Pro•ert Owner:Same as Applicant Phone: Com •an : Email: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033344; 17033433 TAX LOT NO S : 100; 700 Pro•ert Address: not addressed Size of Pro•en :2.28 acres Acres 17 S• uare Feet ❑ Pro •osed Densit : NA Pro•osed Name of Pro'ect: Candlewood Suites Hotel Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro•osal: See attached Existin• Use: TL100: Vacant; TL700: Residential New Im •ervious Surface Covera•e Includin• Bids . Gross Floor Area :31,336 sf Si• natures: Please sign and print our name and date in the appropriate box on the next .a•e. ;Required'_Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Associated A• • licatiioons: Si• ns: Pre-Sub Case No.: FRE 3-Q0DI2- Date: 4-22-13 Reviewed b : ILA _A Case No.: Date: Reviewed b : A• •lication Fee: J LT/ 10 — Technical Fee: -IS--/ Posta•e Fee: TOTAL FEES: 3I� Geo P ' •11;■ PSI 2--00020 APR 2 2 20 3 Revised 2/27/12 EMM 1 of 11 Owner Signatures • • This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre-Submittal The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Owner: �0' Date: 41ISI-3 S' 44:t re Ai pek Print Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: Signature Print PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Revised 2/27/12 EMM 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Sub :tal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ✓ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre-submittal and submittal stages. ✓ Site Plan Review Application Form V Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. ✓ Copy of the Deed ✓ Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. la State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. 71 Completed Attached Scoping Sheet V Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: SI All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. 12 All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Revised 2/27/12 EMM 4 of 11 a. Site Assessme•of Existing Conditions • O Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor • Vicinity Map O The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. O The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department O The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision O The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department O Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan O Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor O Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. O Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs O Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections O Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces O Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district O On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation O Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed O Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces O Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile) lig Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and othO Iir.{iclymi-public uses APR 2 2 2013 Revised 2/23/12 EMM 5 of 11 0 Phased Developrt Plan — where applicable, the Sii Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan O Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor O Location and width of all existing easements O Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. O Location and type of existing street lighting O Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities • Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails O Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. O Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan • Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below O The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components O Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development O Location and width of all proposed easements O Location and type of proposed street lighting O Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D e. Landscape Plan APR 2 2 2013 Revised 2/23/12 EMM 6 of 11 SI Prepared by an ,iitect, Landscape Architect, or of Landscape Professional approved by the Director SI Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage 0 Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 SI Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On-Site Lighting Plan Fl Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached 12 Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: 12 List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing LATER Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. LAME Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. LATdI Photometric test report for each light source. 0 An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. lL A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. PRE-SUBMIlTAl REC'D NIA Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additioifrarniattrrato Revised 2/23/12 EMM 7 of 11 demonstrate lipliance with SDC 3.2-240 • Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW IRA A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives VI Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. LATE If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 VI A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request LATE Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ig Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 1?I An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Revised 2/23/12 EMM 8 of 11 April 16, 2013 Candlewood Suites Hotel Site Plan Review Map 17-03-33-44, Lot 100 and Map 17-03-34-33, Lot 700 WRITTEN STATEMENT In accordance with SDC 5.17-100, Site Plan Review, the applicant, Alpesh Patel with ALKO Investments, is requesting that the City of Springfield review this request and determine that the proposal complies with criteria contained in SDC 5.17-125 and that the requested site plan review can be approved. To aid Springfield staff in this endeavor, the following information is provided. The Site and Existing Conditions A. Subject Site The subject site is comprised _ - . _ of two tax lots (Map 17-03- 33-44, Lot 100 and Map 17- - 03-34-33, Lot 700). Lot 700 ;- contains two older dwelling �. J units and an outbuilding. YL The oldest of the dwellings is approximately 294 sf in size and dates to 1919. The - 11111 newer dwelling, the one closest to Franklin Blvd, is Ay' r ,—- about 3,180 sf and dates from 1931. The structures are proposed for removal. Subject Site Image from Google Earth Lot 100 is vacant except for subject Site August 2012 a temporary use as ODOT construction staging for the adjacent 1-5 Willamette River Bridge project. B. Planning and Zoning 1. Planning. The subject site is in the Glenwood neighborhood of Springfield. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) >kg? t,,, designates the property as Mixed Use (MU) with a Nodal Development (ND) overlay. For portions of the Glenwood neighborhood, including the subject property, the Metro Plan has been updated with the recently adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan. The Glenwood Refinement Zoning and Plan Canoldnalloas Plan was comprehensive in its scope. With the o,;.w.e„w,..e,. Glenwood Refinement Plan, the Metro Plan ='""""'" YYM Nwr.s. designation is as above and the refinement plan c..".n•YWJ. designation is Office Mixed Use. fr.t tai NYY Gw..,0** 2. Zoning. With the adoption of the Glenwood Refinement Plan, zoning for the subject site is the same as the refinement plan –Office Mixed Use. Hotels are a permitted use in the Office Mixed PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'I` Use zone. 2 2 ^ APR2 �f 2013 + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 375 West 4th,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 S C N I R M E R PLANNERS + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS Phone:541.686.4540 Fax:541 686.4577 S a1R E www.schirmersatre.com Candlewood Suites Hotel• Page 2 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16, 2013 II. Site Plan Review—Applicable Criteria Site Plan Review Criteria are found in Section 5.17-125, Site Plan Review-Criteria, of the Springfield Development Code. Applicable sections of the Code are in italics, followed by proposed findings of facts in normal text. 5.17-125 Criteria. The Director shall approve or approve with conditions: a Type 1l Site Plan Review application upon determining that approval criteria in Subsections A. through E., below have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director - shall deny the application. A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The applicable refinement plan is the recently adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan. The adoption of the Glenwood Refinement Plan updated the Metro Plan and Refinement Plan designations as well as the zoning for the site. The Metro Plan designation is Mixed Use (MU) with a Nodal Development overlay (ND), the Refinement Plan designation is Office Mixed Use and the zoning is Office Mixed Use. Given that the zoning was applied in concert with the plan designations for the site, zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and the applicable Refinement Plan. Therefore, this criterion is met. B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including, but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: Public and private facilities and services are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the site. The facility, provider and condition applicable to the site are as follows: Wastewater City Staff indicated at a Development Issues Meeting (PRE12-00020) that there is public wastewater service of sufficient capacity available for the project. Specifically, • wastewater service would be provided by - connecting to the public system at an existing manhole located just off the southeast corner of - the tax lot to the east of the subject site (Map 17-03-34-33, Lot 500). City Staff indicated that an easement on Tax Lot 500 could be provided to accommodate the connection. (As the City "" owns Lot 500, staff has indicated that this - - easement will be granted.) The existing public -- system is shown on the diagram to the right. The proposed wastewater connection is shown on the attached plans. --- Stormwater At the same Development Issues Meeting, city personnel indicated that public stormwater service will be by way of connection to the existing Glenwood Slough which borders the PRE-SUBMIUAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 APR 2 2 2013 Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 3 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16, 2013 subject site to the south. To satisfy city standards, stormwater collected on site will first be treated on site through the use of a vegetated swale. The size, shape and location of treatment facility are shown on the attached plans. Transportation Streets — The subject site abuts Franklin Blvd, an ODOT facility — McKenzie Highway 126. Franklin Blvd is classified as a Major Arterial, has its full right-of-way and is improved with pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk and street lights along the subject property frontage. Access — Tax lot 100 has a vested right of access to Franklin Blvd by way of an agreement with ODOT (See Attachment 3 — Indenture of Access and Attachment 4 — Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road). This right of access will be utilized in the proposal by locating the access/driveway at the northeast corner of Lot 100, which, in turn, will connect to Lot 700. Secondary access will be provided by way of a future 24-foot wide driveway eastward from the site across Lot 500 connecting to an existing shared access/driveway on Lot 400. The access to Franklin Blvd was granted by ODOT in 2000 ( ). The shared nature of this driveway is commemorated on Lot 400 is based on information provided by the City of Springfield. As the City owns, Lot 500, permission to cross Lot 500 will by commemorated by way of a shared access easement to be granted by the City. Transit — Lane Transit District services Franklin Blvd with stops located nearby the intersection of Franklin Blvd and Glenwood Blvd. (See Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map.) Solid Waste Management Solid waste collection is provided by private firms, whose franchise territory granted by the City of Springfield includes the subject site. Regional disposal sites and the Short Mountain Landfill are operated by Lane County. Water and Electric Service Water and electric service is currently provided to the subject site. Glenwood Water District provides water service to Lot 700. Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides water to Lot 100. (Upon annexation, SUB will provide water service for both lots. SUB provides electric service for both tax lots. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Glenwood Water District provides fire protection for Lot 700, while the City of Springfield provides fire protection for Lot 100. Upon annexation of Lot 700, fire protection will be provided by the city for both tax lots. Ambulance services are provided by the City of Springfield for both tax lots. Police Protection Police protection is currently provided by Lane County for Lot 700 and the City of Springfield for Lot 100. Upon annexation, Springfield will provide police protection for both tax lots. With annexation police protection will be consistent with service provision throughout the city. Springfield Police currently travel along Franklin Blvd to provide service to surrounding areas that are incorporated into the city of Springfield. Infill annexations and development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery. Parks and Recreation The site is included within the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Recently approved Bond Measure 20-199 will provide 520 million in bond funds which will be used to help fund future City park acquisition and development throughout the city, including the Glenwood Refinement Plan's proposed riverfront linear park and urban park blocks. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4t"Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene.OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)48E2172013 4 72013 • • Candlewood Suites Hotel• Page 4 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16, 2013 Pedestrian access to these facilities will be by way of street-side sidewalks along Franklin Blvd with crosswalk connections at signalized intersections and connecting access to the riverfront multi-use pathway system. • Communication Facilities US West Communications and a variety of other telecommunications providers offer communication services throughout the Eugene/Springfield Area. Public Schools Eugene School District is the k-12 education service provider.in Glenwood. . Given the above regarding public and private facility availability, this criterion is met. C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Response: Applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and how compliance is met with this proposal is as follows. CHAPTER 3-LAND USE DISTRICTS SECTION 3.4-200- GLENWOOD RIVERFRONT MIXED - USE PLAN DISTRICT 3.4-265 Base Zone Development Standards The following base zone development standards are established for the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District. Development Standard Office Mixed-Use Zone Minimum Development Area (1) 5 Acres Minimum Lot/Parcel Size None Minimum Street Frontage (2) None Minimum Lot/Parcel Coverage None Minimum Density(3) 50 du/net acre Built-to Lines/Building Setbacks Subsection 3.4-275H Landscape/Screening Setbacks Subsection 3.4-270F Minimum/Maximum Building Height Subsection 3.4-275D Additional Standards (4) (5) (6) (7) (1) Minimum Development Area. In the Franklin Riverfront, the minimum development area is necessary due to the number of small lots/parcels and the need to establish the local street grid and park blocks. In the McVay Riverfront, the minimum development area is necessary due to the number of small lots/parcels and in order to prevent piecemeal development of a number of large lots/parcels for compliance with Springfield Commercial and Industrial Buildable Lands Inventory, Economic Opportunities Analysis, and Economic Development Objectives and Implementation Strategies findings. EXCEPTIONS: (a) The developer may submit a letter to the Director stating that either abutting property owners are not willing to participate in the assembly of the minimum 5 acre development area; or there are smaller properties that cannot meet the 5 acre standard (for example, on the south side of Franklin Boulevard or on the west side of McVay Highway). (2) While there is no minimum frontage standard, all lots/parcels shall have frontage on a public street unless the proposed development has been approved as part of a Master Plan, Site Plan or land division, and access has been guaranteed via a private driveway with an irrevocable joint use/access easement agreement as specified in Subsection 4.2-120A. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D �1p q Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(23 106A-457 Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 5 of 15 Site Plan review-Written Statement April 16, 2013 (3) The density standard applies to high-density residential housing in those Subareas where this type of housing is required or permitted. See Subsections 3.4-245B.1.a. and 3.4-245B.2.b. There is no maximum density. (4) Where an easement is larger than the required setback standard, no building or above grade structure, except a fence, may be built upon or over that easement. (5) When additional right-of-way is required, whether by City Engineering standards, the Metro Plan (including the TransPlan), or the City's Conceptual Street Plan, setbacks are based on future right-of-way locations. Right-of-way shall be dedicated prior to the issuance of any building permit that proposes parking spaces. (6) Architectural extensions including but`not' limited to:' cornices` eave overhangs; and porches and balconies extending beyond an exterior wall of a building may protrude into any 5-foot or larger setback area or build-to line by not more than 2 feet. Response: Minimum Development Area (1): The 5-acre minimum development area standard cannot be met due to the existing condition of numerous small lots along the south side of Franklin Blvd. Per the permitted EXCEPTION above in SDC 3.4-265(1)(a) the applicant hereby submits this "Letter" requesting the exception be granted. Minimum Street Frontage (2): Both lots of the subject site have street frontage. Minimum Density(3): As this request does not include a residential component, this standard does not apply. Build-to/Building Setbacks: Refer to findings in Subsection 3.4-275 below. Landscape/Screening Setbacks: Refer to Subsection 3.4-270 below. Minimum/Maximum Building height: Refer to Subsection 3.4-275 below. Additional Standards (4)(5)(6)(7): (4):There are no easements larger than the required building setback. (5):Additional Right-of-Way is not required. (6):There are no building extensions which protrude into a building setback. (7):There is no footnote (7) in the code. Given the above, this standard, 3.4-265, is met. 3.4-270 Public and Private Development Standards A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks. 1. Public Streets, alleys and sidewalks in the Glenwood Riverfront shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter and designed and constructed as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. The following is an overview of the Glenwood Riverfront street network: a. Franklin Riverfront Arterial Street. Franklin Boulevard shall be designed and constructed as a hybrid multi-way boulevard. Response: The applicable street is Franklin Blvd, a state highway and major arterial. It is fully developed to standards. It is in compliance with the Glenwood' Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter, the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures PRE-S�UPBTnMIgAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 41"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Faxi(941 67,6--;511 Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 6 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Manual and the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies as specified in Appendix 3. Appendix 3 describes the corridor for Franklin Blvd abutting the subject property as: B.1.c....The corridor design envelope for the hybrid multi-way boulevard provides for alignment flexibility during final design to...provide design flexibility to minimize right-of-way impacts. B.1.c.2. Jenkins Drive •to Glenwood Boulevard: The Corridor Envelope will narrow to approximately 110 feet west of the Glenwood Boulevard intersection, tapering to meet the facility cross-section within the 1-5 right-of-way. This section of the facility is planned as a modern urban arterial. As the subject site essentially abuts the 1-5 right-of-way to the west, the Franklin Blvd corridor at the subject property will be as the right-of-way is today. B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. Street trees, especially those that provide shade, and curbside planter strips in the public right-of-way shall be as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Therefore, street trees will not be subject to the regulations of this Section and will not be counted toward any landscaping required by this Section. As a general rule, street trees shall be selected on the basis of providing shade and have a size relationship with the street landscape (e.g., the wider the street, the larger the trees). Trees at least 40 feet tall at maturity are required for pedestrian areas. Design considerations shall be focused on space requirements of the selected trees at all phases of their life cycle. Scale, soils, underground obstruction, overhead constraints, branch height, mature tree size, and shadow patterns are examples of design considerations. Proposed tree species shall provide continuity between one site and the next in the same block. Street trees shall be placed either directly in planter strips or within tree wells located between the sidewalk and the curb as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Street trees and planter strips in the public right-of-way shall be shown on the required Site Plan. • Response: The subject street, Franklin Blvd, is fully developed along the subject site frontage, including a curb-side sidewalk. Thus there are no planter strips and trees will be provided behind the sidewalk, outside of the right-of-way and on private property along the site's street frontage. Appendix 3 does not contain any street tree specifications. The Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual states: A. Street Trees: Design plans for'projects requiring street trees shall show the street tree locations in a shaded format on the street lighting plan to ensure street tree locations do not conflict with street lights: Trees shall be at least 20 feet from decorative post top mounted streetlights, and 30 feet from cobra head streetlights. All locations will need to take into consideration Section I — DESIGN STANDARDS 6 - 2 EDSP Adopted December 03, 2012 the presence of overhead power when choosing street trees. Street trees shall not be planted in planter strips less than 4 feet wide. If the planter strip is less than 4 feet; tree placement shall be on the property side of the sidewalk. Tree wells set in concrete or sidewalk areas shall be a minimum of 4 foot x 4 foot. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)601457/ 2 1013 • Candlewood Suites Hotel• • Page 7 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16, 2013 Street trees shall be planted at 30 foot intervals except where the planting interferes with traffic vision, street lighting, traffic signage, or public utilities, or as approved by the Street Supervisor, City Operations Division. When planting large canopy trees, tree spacing may be modified if approved by the City. See Appendix 6A — Approved Street Tree List for the approved street tree species. Response: There are no planter strips or tree wells. With the number of existing utility poles, cabling, overhead lines, signage, lighting, and vision clearance needs opportunities for street trees are limited. The proposal includes a cluster of three street trees as shown on the attached plan set. The specified trees are included-on the city's adopted street tree list. C. Lighting. 1. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. Decorative public street lighting and pedestrian level lighting, as may be permitted in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, shall be included with all new developments or redevelopment. 2. Private on-site lighting shall comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America recommended practices and shall: a. Be the minimum illumination necessary for a given application, including parking areas, as specified in Subsection 3.4-270G.9.d.; b. Be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property; and directed downward and away from abutting properties, public rights-of-way, and riparian zones, wetlands and other protected areas identified in this Code; c. Create a safe and secure environment for pedestrians and bicyclists during hours of darkness and reduce or prevent light pollution by minimizing glare;and d. Provide private on-site pedestrian level lighting, whether free standing or attached to a building. Private ono site pedestrian level lighting is distinct from public street lights described in Subsection 3.4-270C.1. because it is intended to light private property rather than public streets. The height of a freestanding or attached light fixture shall be 12-14 feet and in no case shall exceed 25 feet or the height of the permitted building or structure, whichever is less. In this case, height is measured as the vertical distance between the paved surface or finished grade and the bottom of the light fixture. Response: Public street lighting is existing. Private on-site lighting is as shown on the attached plan set. F. Private Property Landscape Standards. 3. General Landscaping Standards. a. Minimum Standards. The landscaping standards for the Glenwood Rive front shall be minimums; higher standards can be substituted, provided all fence; wall or vegetation height limitations specified in this Section are met. Crime prevention should be considered when exceeding the landscaping standards because the height and density of vegetation may become a safety and/or visibility issue. b. Protection of Existing Vegetation. Existing vegetation may be used to meet the landscape standards if relocated on-site and/or protected and maintained during the construction phase of the development as specified in Subsections 3.4-270F.5. and 6. Any necessary tree felling shall comply with Section 5.19-100. c. Selection of Materials. Landscape materials shall be selected and sited to produce a hardy and drought-resistant landscape area. Selection shall include • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)68 4 2013 • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 8 of 15 Site Plan review-Written Statement April 16, 2013 consideration of the soil type and depth; the amount of maintenance required; spacing; exposure to the sun and wind; the slope and contours of the site; and compatibility with existing native vegetation preserved on the site. Shrubs resembling trees shall not be used to meet the tree standards. d. Plant Diversity. i. Shrubs. If there are more than 25 required shrubs, no more than 75 percent of them shall be of one species. ii. Trees. If there are more than 8 required trees, no more than 40 percent of them shall be of one species. If there are more than 24 required trees, no more than 25 percent•of them can be of one species. This standard does not • apply to existing trees that are counted towards meeting the total number of trees required. e. Specific Tree Standards. L In any required landscape area, trees shall be suitable for this region as may be approved during the land use review process. At the time of planting, deciduous trees shall be a minimum 2 inches in caliper and permitted conifer trees shall be fully branched, between 4-6 feet in height. Spacing and time of coverage of trees shall be as specified in Subsection 3.4-27OF.4. ii. The categories of trees are defined as follows: (a) Large trees in the public right-of-way or on private property are those trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity; (b) Medium-sized trees on private property are those trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall and 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity; and (c) Small or narrow-stature trees on private property are those trees less than 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity. f. Specific Shrub and Ground Cover Standards. i. All of the landscaped area that is not planted with trees and shrubs shall be planted in ground cover plants, which may include grasses. Mulch (as a ground cover) shall be confined to areas underneath plants and shall not be a substitute for ground cover plants. ii. All shrubs shall be of sufficient size and number to meet the required height and coverage standards of this Subsection within 4 years of planting, unless otherwise specified in Subsection F.4. Shrubs shall be at least the one-gallon container size at planting. iii. Ground cover plants other than grasses or sod shall be: (a) At least the 4 inch pot size; (b) Planted in triangular spacing at distances appropriate for the plant species;and (c) Planted at a density that will cover the entire area within 3 years, unless otherwise specified in this Section. iv. Any plants listed on the Nuisance Plants List as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design and Procedures Manual shall be prohibited from being planted in the Glenwood Riverfront. g. Installation. h. Maintenance. i. Irrigation. The intent of this standard is to ensure that plants will survive the critical establishment period when they are most vulnerable due to lack of watering. All landscaped areas shall provide an irrigation system as follows: i. A permanent built-in irrigation system with an automatic controller; Response: Minimum Standards: Proposed landscaping meets the minimum standards specified. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4'"Avenue,Suite 201, Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 9 of 15 Site Plan review-Written Statement April 16, 2013 Protection of Existing: Existing vegetation on the subject site consists of older, little- maintained residential landscape material, including trees, shrubs and lawn. This existing landscape material will not be retained as part of the project. An exception is the area in the southern portion of the site that is within the wetland/riparian area and its setback. Except for where the proposed stormwater treatment swale is, existing landscape conditions will not be disturbed. Selection of Materials: Proposed landscape materials are those often utilized for urban landscapes in the southern Willamette Valley and are well suited for the weather, rainfall, sun-•• • - and wind typically experienced. Plant Diversity: There are more than 25 required shrubs and no more than 75 percent will be of one species. Specific Tree Standards: Selected tree species are suitable for the local environment and urban conditions. Deciduous trees are specified at 2 inches caliper. Evergreen trees will be between 4 and 6 feet in height. Specific Shrub and Ground Cover Standards: All shrubs and ground covers are at least 1 gallon in size. Shrubs will meet their minimum height and coverage within 4 years and ground cover will cover its area within 3 years. Mulch is limited to area underneath plants and is not a substitute for ground cover. Installation and Maintenance: Installation and maintenance shall be as specified in the Code. Irrigation: A permanent, in-ground automatic irrigation system will be provided. G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards. 1. Vehicle/bicycle parking standards shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and the Housing and Economic Development Chapters. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Vehicle/Bicycle Parking Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. 3. Vehicle/bicycle parking and loading standards shall be designed and constructed as specified in this Subsection. 4. Vehicle Parking-General. Adequate vehicle parking shall be provided to support new development and redevelopment in the Glenwood Riverfront, while minimizing adverse visual, environmental, and financial impacts on the public. In line with the land use vision for compact development and a walkable, pedestrian-friendly environment, on-street parking, aboveground and underground off-street parking structures, and parking located within or under buildings shall be encouraged. Locating and designing all required vehicle parking to minimize the visibility of parked cars to pedestrians from street frontages and light and noise impacts of parking lots strengthens the character of the Glenwood Riverfront, reinforces the emphasis on pedestrian, bike, and transit for travel, and minimizes the potential for vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. 6. Maximum off-street vehicle parking spaces by use category shall be as specified in Table 3.4-1. 9. Vehicle Parking Design Standards. The following standards shall apply to all permitted parking facilities: a. In both public and private parking facilities, the stall width and length and aisle width standards specified in Section 4.6-115 shall apply. b. All surface parking lots shall incorporate the following elements including, but not limited to. PRE-SUSMIITAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(5.0-M89272 013 Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 10 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 I. Pedestrian walkways that provide priority over vehicles routes, are direct and accessible, and enhance safety for pedestrians and vehicles. Parking lots with 50 or more spaces shall be divided into separate areas by landscaping or protected raised pedestrian walkways at least 10 feet in width, or by a building or group of buildings. Pedestrian walkways shall include pedestrian-scaled lighting as specified in Subsection 3.4-270G.9.d. and elevated crosswalks and/or distinguishing paving colors, textures or materials, as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The pedestrian routes shall lead to an entrance in the rear or, if applicable, the-side of a building; ii. The use of alternative surfacing as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, including permeable surfacing , where applicable, shall be preferred as an option over traditional impervious surfacing;and iii. Strategies to reduce "heat island" effects, such as canopy shade trees and landscaping as specified in Subsection 3.4-270F.4.c. c. Surface Parking Lot landscaping Standards. Parking lot landscaping shall be required as specified in Subsections 3.4-270F.4.b. and c. d. Surface parking lot lighting shall be provided as specified in Subsection 3.4- 270C.2. and may be a mix of bollards at ground level and pedestrian-level lighting. e. Vehicle parking shall not be allowed within any required or optional building setback specified in Subsection 3.4-275H. 11. Vehicle Parking Access and Driveways. a. In Subareas A, B, and C, vehicle access to a parking lot or parking structure shall be from a service street, alley, or, where there is no service street, other local street in order to minimize the impact of auto parking and driveways on the public pedestrian environment. Each block face fronting a service street, alley or other local street necessary for vehicle access shall be limited to one curb cut. c. Curb cuts for all parking lots or parking structures shall be constructed to maintain the elevation, appearance and continuity of sidewalks crossed by the curb cuts. 13. Bicycle Parking. Safe and convenient bicycle parking shall be provided for residents, visitors, employees and patrons. In mixed-use developments, the required bicycle parking for each use shall be provided. Required off-street bicycle parking spaces shall be as specified in Table 3.4-2. The required minimum number of parking spaces for each listed use is 4 spaces. Response: All parking is provided off-street, in a landscaped and screened lot behind the building. Thus parking is screened from adjacent uses as well as the public realm of Franklin Blvd. Per table 3.4-1, the maximum parking requirement is 95 spaces (one space for each bedroom (85) plus one space for each employee on the largest shift (10)). 86 spaces have been provided, including 4 accessible spaces in compliance with ADA. Parking stall dimensions meet the requirements of 4.6-115. ' Pedestrian walkways are as shown on the attached plan set. Lighting is as shown on the attached plan set. Parking does not encroach into any setbacks. Bicycle parking is provided near the main entrance to the hotel. 5 are required and 5 are provided. H. Wastewater Facilities and Services. 2. Private Wastewater Facilities... for any proposed new or expanded use the developer shall provide for a suitable connection to the public wastewater system... Response: The proposal includes a connection to the existing public system as shown on the attached plan set. PRE-SUBMITTAL IAL RECD Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,'OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541) .,• 57ft 2 2.013 Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 11 of 15 Site Plan review-Written Statement April 16, 2013 1. Stormwater Facilities and Services. All new development, redevelopment and associated infrastructure in the Glenwood Riverfront shall manage stormwater runoff on- site-to provide for water quality treatment and groundwater recharge, to the maximum extent practicable. Response: On-site stormwater will be directed to a new on-Osite stormwater treatment facility as shown on the attached plan set. • - Giver the above, this standard, 3.4-270, is meta- • • • 3.4-275 Building Design Standards The following standards are established for the Glenwood Riverfront portion of the Willamette Greenway(WG)Overlay District: C. Building Facades. The design of buildings and their relationships to the public realm are critical factors in the development of an active and vital pedestrian environment. In all Subareas building facades shall have the following architectural detailing: 1. The ground floor of a building shall utilize all of the following: a. Incorporate awnings, canopies, porticos, or arcades; b. Provide variation in building materials including, but not limited to: tile, brick, split-faced concrete block, concrete horizontal siding, masonry veneer, and powder coated aluminum or traditional wood storefronts that are differentiated by, trim, paint, and ornamentation; c. Utilize ground floor windows and entrances that provide a high level of transparency by allowing views both inward and outward;and d. Utilize signs;or other features, including public art. 2. The upper stories shall utilize all of the following, as applicable: a. Include architectural detailing utilizing some of the same design elements specified in Subsection 3.4-275C.1.; b. Incorporate a change in the window style; c. Integrate a change in floor height; building step backs, as specified in Subsection 3.4-275D.4.;or a combination of these elements;and/or d. Provide differences in height and architectural elements including, but not limited to: parapets, cornices and other details that may be used to create interesting and varied rooflines. In addition, building corners may incorporate taller elements including, but not limited to: towers, turrets, and bays. 3. More than one type of building material may be used for building identity. 4. Building facades that do not front a street, alley or mid-block connector shall be constructed with design elements similar to those facades fronting streets. Response: As shown on the attached plan set, the ground floor of the building incorporates awnings, variety in building finish texture and color, and contains a number of windows. The upper floors follow this same theme, with variations in finishes„ articulation and ample windows. D. Height. The following standards are intended to: allow for a range of building heights within a development area; support an interesting skyline and the ability to market view properties; and reduce impacts of shading from tall structures on the public realm. Lower structures combined with taller structures within a single development area will be permitted to allow for a variety of design solutions. 1. In all Subareas, the minimum building height shall be 2 stories above grade. 2. In all Subareas, there shall be no maximum building height. 4. In Subareas A, B and C, step backs that are a minimum of 15 feet wide shall be required beginning at the fourth story of a building and after each I IAC %ti® Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4t Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540 Fax(8b1j 686-457tZU 13 Candlewood Suites Hotel• • Page 12 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Uses for the lower roofs may include, but not be limited to balconies and observation decks. 5. In all Subareas, non-residential ground floor space (commercial/office/light manufacturing businesses) shall have a minimum floor to floor height of 15 feet to accommodate space for mechanical systems. Response: The proposed building is greater than 2 stories. The height limit is not an issue. In lieu of step backs beginning with the fourth floor, the hotel utilizes an L-shape configuration combined with facade articulation to achieve the same effect. As the proposed hotel is not within the commercial, office or-light. manufacturing use category; the e15-foct first floor height requirement does not apply. E. Massing/Building Articulation. Where buildings are highly visible from public areas, massing shall be addressed by articulating the facades with insets and projections to create visual interest and enhance views from the adjacent public realm. Response: The proposed building includes articulation on all sides, including projections, repeated window patterns, variations in roof lines and changes in building finishes. F. Windows and Doors. 1. Ground floor windows and doors that face a public street, alley or mid-block connector. The following standards apply to primary entrances to buildings: c. In Subarea C, commercial and office windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 60 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of a building's first floor facades to allow views into lobbies, merchandise and work areas and allow persons inside to look out. 2. Upper story windows that face a public street, alley or mid-block connector. In all Subareas, upper story windows shall be required on all building facades and shall comprise a minimum of 25 percent of the length of the building's facade for each story. 3. In all Subareas, the use of low-reflective glass shall be encouraged as an energy conservation method. 4. In all Subareas, frosted glass, spandrel windows, and other types of glass or film coatings between 3 feet above the sidewalk grade to 8 feet above the building slab that diminish transparency on the ground floor shall be prohibited. Response: The proposed use is not in the commercial or office use category and thus the minimum percent of length and wall area does not apply. Upper story windows facing Franklin Blvd comprise 25 percent of the building length, low-reflective glass is encouraged and frosted or other film coatings are not proposed. G. Orientation/Entrances. 1. In all Subareas: a. Primary entrances to all new buildings located on'a street, alley or mid-block connector shall be designed to include at least 3 of the following design elements: an awning, canopy, overhang, or arch above the entrance;recesses or projections in the building facade surrounding the entrance; a peaked roof or raised parapet structures over the door;or display windows surrounding the entrance. Primary entrance design elements attached to buildings shall be: L At least 9 feet above the sidewalk or grade; ii. Suspended from the building(Le. not supported by posts or columns that may interfere with pedestrian traffic); PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686 4577 Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 13 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Response: The pr4oject's primary entrance does not face a street, alley or mid-block connector. Nonetheless, it does include an overhang above the main entrance, suspended from the building and is a minimum of 9 feet above the sidewalk. H. Build-to Lines and Building Setbacks. 2. Building Setbacks. a. In Subareas A, B, C, and the portion of D north of the Union Pacific railroad trestle and within the nodal development area, buildings may be setback a maximum of 10 feet behind the build-to-line. This standard will still allow the establishment of a pleasant and diverse experience by providing additional pedestrian amenities. Pedestrian amenities shall be addressed as specified in Subsections 3.4-275I.2.a. and b. Response: The proposed hotel is setback 10 feet from the build-to line. 1. Pedestrian Amenities. 2. Pedestrian Amenities Standards. The pedestrian standards are minimums. The developer is encouraged to provide additional pedestrian amenities. a. Where there is no building setback, the following coordinated pedestrian amenities shall be provided on each block or development area, as applicable, located between the curb and the build-to-line: i. At least one bench for every 80 feet of street frontage; ii. At least one trash receptacle for every 80 feet of street frontage; and iii. At least one pedestrian-scale wall mounted light meeting the standards specified in Subsection 3.4-27OC.2. for every 50 feet of street frontage. b. Where there is a building setback, in addition to the pedestrian amenities specified in Subsection 3.4-2751.2.a., two additional pedestrian amenities from the list specified in Subsection3.4-275 1.2.c., shall be provided for each 80 feet of street frontage. c. Additional pedestrian amenities include, but are not limited to: i. Sitting space (e.g., outdoor seating areas for restaurants, benches, garden wall or ledges between the building entrances and sidewalk); ii. Building canopy, awning, pergola, or similar weather protection (minimum projection of 4 feet over a sidewalk or other pedestrian space); iii. Transit shelters; iv. Information kiosks; v. Sidewalk displays; vi. Drinking fountains; vii. Wayfinding signage for pedestrians consisting of a distinctive logo and directional guidance to neighborhood destinations; viii. Planting beds, hanging flower baskets, large semi-permanent potted plants, and/or ornamental planters; ix. Pedestrian-scale lighting either free standing or attached to the face of the • building as specified in Subsection 3.4-27OC.2. for every 50 feet of street frontage; x. Decorative pavement patterns and tree grates; xi. Decorative clocks; xii. Public art sculpture, statues, murals, or fountains; xiii. Bicycle racks; xiv. Stands selling flowers, food or drink, as may be permitted by the Springfield Municipal Code; and xv. Entry steps, porches and front gardens for residential mixed-use buildings. 3. The 80 foot spacing standard in Subsection 3.4O27512.a., above may be flexed, and pedestrian amenities may be grouped or placed closer than this standard as long as PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4th Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•F {$4i 161617 • Candlewood Suites Hotel • Page 14 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 the quantity of amenities meets the minimum requirements and the spacing averages 80 feet along the street frontage. Response: The proposed building is setback. Thus pedestrian amenities are provided. These include: Wall mounted lighting and plant beds. J. Screening Roof-Top Mechanical Equipment. Visual impacts of mechanical equipment shall be located and/or screened so they are not visible from adjacent public and private streets or adjacent residentially zoned property. Acceptable screening includes:raising the parapet on all sides of the building to be-as-high as the highest mechanical unit or - vent on the roof, or a secondary roof screening system designed to be as high as the highest mechanical unit or vent on the roof. Secondary roof screening systems shall be enclosed groups of units rather than a box around each unit, incorporated into the design of the building, and constructed with materials that are compatible with those of the building. Mechanical equipment also shall be sited and shielded to protect adjacent uses from noise impacts. Response: Roof-top equipment will be screened from view with raised parapets located on all sides of the building. 3.4-280— Willamette Greenway Standards The subject site is outside of the Willamette greenway and this criterion does not apply. D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been located and designed to promote vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian safety. Vehicle access is at the northeast corner of Lot 100 and does double-duty in providing access from the right-of-way to both tax lots. Thus only one access/driveway to the Franklin Blvd corridor. Pedestrian safety is ensured with the provision of a side3walk from the site access/driveway to the hotel entrance, bicycle parking location and parking area. Connections to transit stops are provided with the existing street- side sidewalk along Franklin Blvd. Driveways on the arterial are further minimized with the provision of secondary access through the shared access driveway to the east across Lot 500. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Response: The subject site is in an urban environment, with over 100 years of settlement and human disturbance. Physical features are limited to the southern portion of the site which contains a WQLW facility— the North Channel of the Glenwood Slough. As shown on the enclosed attachments (Attachments 10 and 11), the slough is a jurisdictional wetland/riparian corridor and includes a 50-foot setback. The enclosed plan set documents the presence of the resource and the setback. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4°i Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax((¢1 V88-17Z 013 • Candlewood Suites Hotel Page 15 of 15 Site Plan review—Written Statement April 16,2013 Ill. Attachments A. Attachments The following attachments are provided to assist staff in evaluating the application: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2—Warranty Deed - 1950 Attachment 3—Indenture of Access— 1962 Attachment 4—Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road— 1962 Attachment 5—Application and Permit for Access—2000 Attachment 6— Special Warranty Deed -2007 Attachment 7— Preliminary Title Report-2007 Attachment 8—Stormwater Management System Scope of Work Attachment 9—Stormwater Management Report Attachment 10—Wetland Delineation and DSL Letter of Concurrence Attachment 11 —Wetland and Wetland Buffer Diagram IV. Conclusion Based on the information contained in this written statement, the applicant believes that the requested Site Plan Review can be approved. If there are any questions regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to contact Rick Satre, AICP, at Schirmer Satre Group, 541-686-4540 or rickschirmersatre.com. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • APR 2 2 2013 Schirmer Satre Group•375 West 4`"Avenue,Suite 201,Eugene,OR 97401 •(541)686-4540•Fax(541)686-4577 L. WOW1.13eUV -� -, ; NY,�� £09[6 i!O'Plal16uudg 7., E Aw.:=:....:'W:�:�..�'::' 'Pmme WIINIuei S 00 """ e .d . ,:.:wr=MAOI M IaloH saving pooMOIpue3 F CL«uw oC ypyYl fig c.e./3 I4.9YYWtN bd Marla'WI A41011.1 1011610 r' i• '9 ~fat dew � IUI3I l c y^w UIOZ '64 ddV ° OIO381VthV (1S-3Zid al X E CI w Z W W (l J ` I„, ,, 7___ ■ 11 s ` S2Sl 9� � . H Fr=--- s4PS 4a o Z to II y • W i L--v.—.. _ ` roc --1 \1. . Q � Franklin Blvd dQ�� r �� . a ,J obio - ■ le % I '” n / g sd it _ tsv oom QD IS PJowo) • a ? {i[ o • Cany odtssrssm I ;I Flo. .-.:-_---1, t t.5 rt—1I 0 b 'I • - i w • 1 W illi f II I 4 l 11 _ pal. i . ... . , . .,. --Dd.j_._prAricak 2 2 f 1 I [1] .. 3 a A c 7 _ji/ a Jo-pm Fowl NS Y• L1 '1 N — J• T ;%r_ i5 ensn6nd — m 'a re H m IS mawanli•,n - < U , c S „11...,' I T O 75lolsie ix ji °cal FF p��ac�y,�s k� o. • C. I I - �S euo• • ,� 01 admill. __ _ • �+ �' 2 711,1 _ ,, ,, i. 1 2 AIN MIRO I 1rI1 S .-.`• • — • Attachment '2' •tF WARRANTY DEED r' 422 J-8(1 `'`:E. „:. ?SW Inbnlnlet 11011fitteittb,Tbet-,.ve,...tsP as.Ng9sa.end.lD4L4X..NaP4v+..61v4..kAaMD...Rg._._... :9: .....L. .AifPZ.kw.fA7Ra...gAb R20..!WA.9Lp. grapiest,for the consideration of v:I'. . 1 is:.` the sum of_..._fie.end.00/3(p.....($1.!l0)...esd-o tier.-¢stusb1.e ttnsidarntlan..-.-._-...x.aDOLLAR6 to._,_.-_ua... .....................paid be we bargained end sold and by these pnwenty do....bargain,mill and convey ...'..1 - �• ;. . unto the 6TATg OP OREGON,by and through Iii GRATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION,the following dnlcrlbed ... 7 • G.:. promisee,to wit: parcel of lead lying in the Zen Sweet D. L. 0. 968, also in the Southeast ' %'` quarter (31)}) of Mention 33, fowneh p 37 South. Range 3 Vest, H. H„ rano County, ,',� •{ e Oregon, the said parcel being described as follows) Beginning at a point on the Westerly line at that toot of land convcyod to the ; , State of Oregon by and through its State Highway Conatneion, by that dead r000rded I,.: . in Hook 234 Page 292 of lane County Deed Records) Said point being opposite and 170.5 foot distant Southerly from (when measured at right eagles to) the onnt•.r line of the Peoifio highway et Sngineov'a Station 195483.5, maid point also being 560.0 feet South I' end 1291.5 feet West of the Nertimnot corner of the Zara Sweet D. L. C. 9 thane It.'..• South 720 111 30° West 379.69 feet to the existing highway right of way tine) thenoo . along said right of way line North 15° 561 30° West 45 foots and North 72°111 30” 7^., Zest 380 fast) ttenoo South 15° 341 30° East along the Westerly lino of said Stateyt• ,-5- pvopertr, 45 feet to the point of beginning. '$ (�`: The parcel of lend to which this description applies contains 0.39 ncre, V As en essential part of this transaction, we, the lnderelgaed, as the owners , in tee simple of the ac trt of lard &bitting on the Pacific Highway, ae described I' , in those certain deeds wherein Zames Reyes and Audrey L. Hayes wore grantees, re- norded in Volume 124, Page 168, Volta. 126, Page 593, Volume 129, Page 594, Volwae• 137, Page 334, and Volume 140, Pogo 69, Deed Records of Lane County, Oregon, of I`': which the real property covered by this dsod is a part, do, for ourselves, our heirs Ir. ' oM assign, . lj, transfer, convey and relinquish to the State of Oregon, land through Sts State Rlemer Coetie eo oion, Ito successors and eosins, forever, all easement of looses end all rights of ingross, egress end reopens, to tray end between the real property described !al said rocordsd deed end the above daeignatid highway. e • [ RIG es T, there is reserved the right of icons teen said abutting land to said ' )�, highway of a width not to amend 25 root on the South olds thereof opposite Highway I'1 Engineer's Station 19911361 said notes, to he for ordinary travel to end from the 11.1. abutting land only and shall not me,t be used'in connection with any corcial institution or activity estebliehed or conducted em the adjoining property, ndlich, in ey manner, caters to, invites, solicits from or to dependent upon t1m users of sail highway. - Grantee, State of Oregon, shall have the right at its option to build at any . future tine at its sole coat, an oaten highway within the right of uey. Upon °on- otruotion or'such outer higts.n., all right of moose to end from the highway, if ery to herein epeoitiolally reserved, shall cease, but grantors, their heirs and ensigns, shall Novo moues to the outer highway. 5.16 outer hig!wyy shrill ne ll be °unoted to the ` moues main highway only at suoh point or paints as the as the State of Oregon may designato, ' . It is expressly intended that those eovwnents, burdens and restrictions shell ran with the land and shall forever bind the grantare, their heirs and assigns. • I; PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • APR 2 2 2013 • • K �.y�a CO,"I Mnt�. .. - i • , .'RMh 418 *CIO TO HAVE MD TO HOD the said premix/1 with their eppurtamncee,In fee shale,unto the said State of Oregon,by andthrough ha Slots Highway Cwmmbden,lta aurc¢eon and assigns toms. And,....Vu_...the said grantor ll de....hereby eminent to end with the sold Rote of Dregee,by and mrm:gb ha State FII(.,weY Cammlokn,Its nMdaamv and nWCM, bel..._,JN.er1..__........ .the swnae..0. ,. 1•:,.. in Ire simple sf said pr6mlaap Niel they Are free from oil h,wrmwaade ' Inn!that. . Yll ..will warrant end defend the lane front nll lawful ebdme whatsoever. , t�. IN W1TNER8 W1IXi1FaW`.. . W .. ....hove herniate td .0141'.. ..band.P.end m1.!_, this A ,dm-of �•4– .__.. .111...}9)• p,mainprenmrrof: t % --'//-� ii ( � ./` 1f'.( C ?94. (gent,) 1 t�p_�. / .. ...IAEALf , ii, it i , J • 1 STATH UT IRIX1OS sit (Nanny of -C.. , Du that ,'V dm',d 9__s' m.,.•rr-`_ .Id$O,ptvunmlly same before nw, o llotory.Pdblde.. (... .. .. ..in end let said enunly sad stale,the within Rst�unn�ed !. Jams HMO . and AROA7.1147.9, nigh.1W/0K9_FY hvdlpl..lyhH`wl�e, to nu'pewn,ally known to be the hlmtlkel pmen.P drxeribnl le,sad trim executed,the within ItwtnmmL I. e d who web pm'sonally aeYn.w1edgnl In dm that they oxrtiinrl the mmo freely end vN oolm il,for the Me • end purposes thmehl tamed. • / 1VIInm,my hold and rdfkial sent Ilse tlny and ylmr lutt plan wrtilts. t .I • • \ • ig ' d i� o j I, xt Y , h f g � a ! i "i I el 1b1eil Sag PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • I _ 4't,sere �...•.,r-T" _ k � ,. ; Y n�� '..i b h� T1�� ,1.i Mon AND BALg NEW ii. i`:: - .PBIS INDENTURE �BBTH, that the 8U OF mato, b7 and through rte !tats . 1 Brier Oootisedon,•for the oonsidention or the sin of d.s and 00/100 (01.00) v :. ;;.. {:; . Dollar and other valuable consideration to it paid, hos bargained and Bold and :s • L•••; by these si sta dose bargain, sell an atom unto Jaws Naas and Audrey La F� Hayes, husband and vife, the felloving dasoribad preni gs, to rite I.:: •paroal of Land lying in Nara Sweet D. L. C. 068 also in tb 1` Bontbaaet gotrter (Salt) of gsotins 99, tnwnahip 17 Ooath, DAMS 9 Wet, . . I.:.': V. it., Lane tbmfih Egon, the said parcel being described as follies, at •point on th'N.stery Una of tint trout of land • P. noun to 4 84t* ofOregon. by end through its State Rl.daag' tiee- aission by Wet deed recorded Y Book 2lt Pap 292 of Lane Ommt7 Died Ranordsi said point being oppodte and 176.5 teat distant Southerly • Su (i'ben snasurod at right nudes to) the Banter line of ids Pacific Higbey at lhgtanr'■Station 1 .ji Add print also being 560.a fast death and 1291.5 feet last of the Northaaat our sr of the Yea . Be D. L. 0. /681 thence Booth 169 90' Fast along said We/body SUS Lproperty line 21.7 fast to an rata narking the Southwest oornsr of said ;d 4r '' pr'opertai thane Smith 720 50' cart alias the Boutlertyy Use of said t property 220.6 feet thence North 169 90' Nest along the Sastarly line I. of Mid property 1;7.15 frati theme South 720 11' 10' Vest 189.5 feat f;; to the point of beginning. ' . Sh e panel of land to tab 'hie description applies contains 0.99 f 1 a0ra. q Provided, however thug is eusptad and ,nerved to the grantor, . and waked and relinquished tv the grantee, all rights of moss between ', the shove described red property and the right of vy of the public , highs abutting oat he Northerly aids than of, tab Wblio hien <-' for the purposes of identification le deeigneted as the 1'aoifio mfvq, . • being State Higbvy No. 1. This reaarvation ends/option stall rim '� vitro the land and shall not be suhjeat to aodirioatten, oanoellation or destruction by adverse th usage or estoppel op natter how long eontid. /... Nothing in this 0nrayanas contained shall b me be 000atrsed as conveying aq Y. aerate, right title or interest in and la the public highway right of ' j vy nor (Mt fights of waverdon therein or thereto. i • This ocnneyanos is math, mooted, and delivered upon the grounds • •• and for the reason that the real property haniaabovo d000ribed is no 4 looser needed, required, or useful for highway purposes. i • ii i PRE-SUBMITT,, ZEC'D APR 2 2. 13 . y. ..9L1, . • • --- t:,r.,. dit.i SS.k f i fijiti@ •;.1,:;>7,-..p-:.:,ri' 1r;,.. it1L1 _ ` B ! : f '`t �.Y.2 ' i' 1 �e - ir4. ` fir „ ! ' ci. ilrwrpaFtd r •'Wt" gtetia't�btesoa; i 'r �'d 3'.'S"PT .19'.' . !•way msullaiog,•bas•aaoasa*i anal ar,sia o�*bs Sfkod Mai t1 i Warta' ; as p ' peasant*to be neowt►d on // 47 dt .,!' I , '. i :.1950. . ,l _ .. .. e. t »-1S r ) 5,42'-.1-.. . Eteaajh lti t s : . .t ;it'N11 ,;-„ Qrrl� `•' Haar b'is - .'t /l;P % } Ipw f ' r' 1 ►ttaatl ‘14:1A.' (' ," l'1:1;,' 4 ' t gin-.":. .,or Se I.tary s . ''''''.7.:' i.a:. Cava• ..7..• ,..E,. • .,5.; 9718 Or O"BlCdi ) 4'. �-w.11).os 1".."•; County ofjf— n , ;- Co Ude• //"(day of y� -, 1950, before re appeared. s;. Si- Dan a. Oheailr, Chas. N. Rays K. fkzvert"to me pa'aoaally hove, '= who each Slag a morn, aid ay that S.the sofa Ss A. Chandler to u Chairmen of the State Nighvl4r Cvwwlsslon of tis State. of Oregon, lad that ha,, • 1`- the gets Chao. S. Rtyfolda end he the said N. K. Nafvor. la State.ntibnaa' ' Comdeatonor et Us State of 0»pant that the seal affixed to said:'Snatriaant r,: '• if the seal of ids State NSghvay Coestasion, ad that So said Wt1YWab-ls 'c;t.. signd and salad in*half of aald State >a said Coaaiaalon, and that t9i said js Shalman and the said Oofgiaalonora ast owl1eaddgoa said Sa•tromnt to S the ins _O..`, . sot and deed of said State, ty said State Ittgtuq Caaaiaston. ' .i i. i' IN TECTItd.Cif NIIFIIEOF I hero hereunto set q hand and affixed q official r,... seal the day and your last stove written. • -(. Notary d o for goo• t 'i.\i It• Notary arylrees , Jrer1..5$`/lea/ .. • I i, a�e tit .1•;',..1,; •;.• '011 ' �/ r r PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • Attachment '3' a m KY T 66778 y4a Wes fl, ,r i _ ' , + --•-• 31mBw871g A AO0� • :.r , y I ' e •+ N 1 • ..+• 9878 IW It9R8, aide and stetted this )...w dry of-4:4:1•9� 1.... .i.',':.::.''.•:`,...\. _ .. i - 19-6.i :by-MA bitten the STATE Cr QWOM, by and through its Btste:�Agh n9:�•'.- ' 4,t . • ,_z' - OosaLstan,'-haiioifta cent "Btkti.a Ana 7A1019 aYm'she AWBfiAISml M husband ard wife, herelaafter called 'Gram.? ,; ' • ::: •••(' WRORAB, Btsn soquird Span Jives Byes aM Auern$yisyn: basalt!and + _•1. wife;.by warranty dad .mound oa June 49, 1950, reoordMd to Voluns•17a, . , ?. -i; Pogo 189 of the D'i'd Records of Lane County. crania property blotto the ' southwsterly quarter of Section 33, 9ownehip 17 Booth, novas$ neat WM.. + .1.: '.• ...::::,v...._-•::... Lane County, Oregon) ad a • "a.•r•.m.v r i ._. i W RAB, said did remand to the graters soot. to the Kafaasta'}tigh..' ***AM. .+;.�V,.:,.. ._ way at Mils Post 00% Lagfwsr+s station 199+86, on the.southerly side there- a• pe 1 of, for ol'dinelY tr{wl Co and from the abutting tans of.the grantors earl • uY WMH%SAR, dtsn, by resolution made on the net day of Jay, 1931, aM , .a:,..,-.442..:•,:.4..;.r. enter in etato records as thracglrye and Rights of Moos, Reeelutica M, entered .y;. n, provided that to train instate restrictions upon we of sawn pointy .; : oa dd be mind and unlimited use could thsnaftsr be made of Ego sown `; polnte: and wRin.W3,R..olutfon.W farther pranded.9Mt the Omens sheui4 IW in d. ,. g" ranee to Stan the estimated asovM.ol the cwt of nostrnoting such &coolan- r :'� ,7• - tion and aeoa oration lane as are needed for the safety of the tnneling pub- . .. .. 4A .1t • ',:;; . . 'WIDQt6g, maid-Resolution Al provided further that etas could, stay r:,r ,�. tine, ooneWUSt or eth.Meo provide• frontage road Or roads within the baud- +, I' :. ' arts of troy present or hereafter acquired right of way,.whonapon an rights ii h : • • • . ' " '�': FYi_`.cSet'`_ i. .4 r ':' I 1 .. '+ttr"":.F..T•Yr -1St : r t,,ill 1 " 1 APR 2 2 2013 ._1111.------........... .... ....stemes■Ipmstmmee■nmogammen , ..,,.2-2,;z-r..............,,i,, ..,..„..,,,,._ :-.. ,,r=7,--. .r.....:-...-.:;,....-z-.r.7.-..y.....7. .4....----77-;;;;;7:7,77:7-7.--C. s....:-.772.,- r-77, .;,.,--.=-..::.-. '""1--'7".. 1.),-:-..........,....... r--' "n7 1" '71- "'.:L...-.;-?" - 7‘ '',I:4'-" :,,,....7.777,7'4.=7-7":0.r.r.=='."-:".7 ittyitt .. ,- - -.4,--,,Ty.uyas.2-.5..i-..-7...uttfzu.airs.iii.-iiivir.rreutJii-7,,:41:zi..-fri.:;r-i.y.w.r.i..-itist,5...4.t/-erjf";`Ji.t.:1JpILIII-ILIZI.7.W.=;.M.71‘77: "•-•-t-u.".,,:t7::::71,..^;:r..7.t.a-t-5:-..."1:t:P.:+1.,1'.tr.z.r.,....s:7--.•-.7.'”?.'".■••":.'"Xt 31.eaw''•'-4•-•tt.‘,#.--5". .w..=.7 7...-nrarr-,..e.*1,.t--...":.:Q..1-%••.%:.,:•.-.1:•L T", l.:.r.r:...... ::',24.'t-i4;:(..F....7::-Vi:r.i;...&.-17"-TEr‘i•- •C;Vit'.4.1‘;-.,-Ii-Tt.;,,,-;•..7,11.;.'7:4.“.1:4-17.7.-4,..“...---ffi."7.‘;-4-47,F,L.en,r‘-•.-..4":-..--1F-.1,,,2-11—.7.. .",-; ,71-4---a.Z".......:r....1,......:.-:.;;;:,--4--1,:. ::;:-....?..--,;:::.1-.1.-;igi••..:.: .-t.'/..-,-,..-: n.::,$<.!.•,.;:4.,. .•.',;,.,17,- .,...;.:*tr4 :?"."''rs:7i,"' ..'.". . .•.'. ' -•".-. ..\I:k:41.::-.":7.TT'. .';;;='..i:4i.';':;:••7.:: -7. .• ?" . 1--. ed 'jalierf ..;:.` .4..- : .. t`...' .: • ' - 1" i.- 7 ',..•.i.'' 1'. . . Of Ste4-u.s of t tooted to the oem traveled way , . 7; ;', 7-,;(„'-- . .- ..... Sib tho,10eniro'woulf line dill/olt•d nee achoes'to the frontage roed_ce ..-...,, i.:..s.•.• •:!..4. '.:,•,,;;„i :;=.;1.12..-; IS 1 " •: 1- : 'Sf.o.7414;(.9.1•,..it_qnsTi; .141;&iis tioals idlore,n!ise;ttn?:od:'No si,49,92215••....., .• 4;-." /;;;.11", '14"4-4''''''I.:.-i'c*.".■ 4 - striated or iiialsited mei:pan the .siliSuios paysent .5 the estlisiiedlesite 41; ' .4.'...,.;.',"•7:.1 ' of the ,aa,etrustson of th •asesterstion and des•I•rotiem lish•siehi . . .. •. ,.'... ; )i ''',;,`-:, ' , . . . . ... ... . ‘"...''''''':''''''l''' • . •t.4:..'. -"' ' .•'.• I ibilattla, th:.0.;;re-have requested that the,ass restriatica on"heir. • - .. ... .. 4 c;Il:II74:“".VIVI. ''point of oppoiite Highway Engbworie Station 199106 be remind Cid .• . ..•:. ,.; ,,,,, , 1::?•,....firr....iiIHit.:7,:,".3.4,:f. - - tbst.ths width of said s000seitio inarossed froz.23 feet to at foot, awl they o . 7..“74..-1.2:.. IC'174:•:••"""=”.=. .. have paid and deponitedwitalitste the sun of 43,196.00, tdiich is the ;. ,I..I.Iiii..f.l."..-.Z.7. , • ostlistad east at aonstrileting the*oasis/at/on sai.deeelerstioniense • ••:4:;.•.:.',",',"::: .i.Ji.i...,..".....r,'X.:u.-.1. '-':17..'"'.'".s.4".7i' ,t"74 4.•••:':“.:* - which are nseessory for the safety of the traveling pistil,when the use of . ,.-4-•4,14 ‘`,4-, t .....i,;..C,...1,...,.•:.•:6•44 4, .5.••”41'-'•:‘•••.' inad...... point to converted to an unrestrieted or anliatted Willa NW, THISSYlatil, in eakteidention of 13,196.00 and other••••••nt• here- • •I iiI7.,":=.4',".•4 •I'I`C.'.-I'7,1;::::- ',', • ‘.'il•i.:••••.4, ,'".::,:I: ' ' in centeinsd State does hereby*en, transfer, convoy and grant unto Oemra, ..,,,,,,,,..„ their Sire end assigns, eseeitant• of and rights of invoice, ogress h71."••+1. .''';',''.•:i.:. •. lied ragas to, free she betwoon the right of way et the SfsIonsi•Highway ;II -.oe•-•:2.-.• ::'4'4;•'.'f.i."'..11.44::14 . • - and the itinsre, land abutting on.ths eoutherty side of told higtfley of • • tr), ..'"7.1.„•-...r,--„ '...■e,...-"-:,..-..,-" %:„..:-.-itt.......4.7c-...;-44.1 „ • • . width di 45 net opposite Highway Hnifineerio Station 199116, and unreetrioted •S' .",'"'::=7.`;':. . . Tr447.4":1"7".•-41.•%, vs to use, kitOilDED. 'SWAM, the soles* point'herein awaited is.subjoet to ' ..4,S-.',':••'7'!".'"*.-.... "„r...:.'......':a..;‘:..••:(1 - . . . ."....2.:•.',:::::::::'Y-.:-.' ...11„ . an.the:right et the State to ocnst.ruot • frontage road or road., a set forth ' :: .•:'..-I- i....i: c - . •• in Rosolatici;ha heretofore esszitioneid, and in such event, the mien, to the '''. :*.;'.;!...•,:.2.j.-7.,;',i ‘. - .. . - .-. „• ,- 7i &Kenai* Stighway flap. eosin, but the Owosso, their heir* or neigna, Asti/ . • •:.:..;L.,•,;•.;'..; ,.LI.".-"Il , •.. ' .l`:2 '-'),_ •.,.• I' 7:;;;_-44 - •;:z.u....7 - hao e1lesss to tlio;trontsgt stied or roods, tub...trifled•• te.u.............. .- -• • .';1.....1)"...-;...::: ,:t..•;:•Fi'Y'L..7(-"M'r. • 1 ' Swoosh so herein modified, the deed of June 29, 1.950, remains in full . frigh‘telits"of 4thfreMbitttaatentlOtehbeisildit°°.rthreoarteianpirecanactladershinroad:w.hiniersub3pon.ht istilltelik.reet ::', ,...::',: . ..d. -• ' ' . . . .. . ... • • - •"-* • • ..... . -• • '''..1....:■?"..z.'71...',.ft;;;•?...., .: . 4 , ... . .- .. 1 .. , ' . . : .. . - - . fl .....' 7.:•'..--471)1C.r... .. i . I 41 'l ...,.. L #•-rtr.6ti!..n.r.t,”••-....--r.--.•..ri.:‘,4-i•z4.; . 4 -,-. •••.;-:-.: •;••,.• i•;•;:i.:::.....:. —.I -41--j• ..•. ■',xi..., :,.....•..•,..•••i..r.i 4: e .44 . .14 • •1/4,••(• r.•;!:; ••••:;.;.'•,•%.. •• -1:4:1*•14.• Yri 4.1•.. It,"'r l'-'.. 4 ,,,-,., ,.. ;..,:,?,•,.. ..s...:,.....).',2:,■.:.:•:;. :..',:... . -; . -1,::•‘`-it' '' '''•‘. ', "4.,...:7‘..".,...*:' ...::•''.':..i. :.'•,....'......!.....'I•A:'- ./4.",:j.&t,:;c``-,:t1...4..,L.i-t‘"ir,.:;,;.4: .,1)c,:7..%.'1:• -i •p.,.;..c. .....,:,,A• ..-..••.,•-. ....'i..;:.:,', ,.:'r '.!...,,,:.,-:..;,„ l3 - . , 1 '•; . , . • - v - . . 1pa. I4 . ,..';-;:.,-,I',.I"::.•.1;1.;14Z1/2a. t..I V','.4'.''.'::' ..... .......... .,. .....__..._,...,_. .C.7-777 -77.7.7777-7 "- • - - " -, i ... APR 2 2 2 013 , , . • • . . ' •••-•=.;,•-7-..—re- ' • ' '""n-r- •--- -- . - '''''"•••-'"- rr.c1.1=7.;;••=-7.7,7-7.:7•''"‘''' '1".1—''''''.'''7. :-`n'. 7 :; ;=7.-". ..;€;....—'^'-'7...;..".".'"'"ILL,,,,Y.17,7tr, ''........'.4.....C...;",a77"..'af7--..:::=174:: 77,..::7...:;;;L:....,:-..:,,.4.7.1.„....;; ..45.'1.`-“-?:-=.nrti-C-2■..-.-r-,';,...?"2.=.1-11:---7--...-_-.n.-r.-::- .,----- 4._. ___ _.._.:—:.----....., .....-.7.,...—......-..,..,..c......„,.........-.........----i..........1/4.-.........—...,....--,,.....----.......-...-=,-,,,____.___ ,„...,_„ ,r ..r..._, ,......, . -- :- 7. 4:-.WeW:.-- -:‘Vir:: ... :.4,--ci:1-.4'-',a^:Th. ;44?-4-'''''''''''--t-n"`rt-nr.77.--fir!7.7.'-'7' •7. ... : ..- ' --.- • . • • " •-• j• - . rfa...-44::4LL:-...4-1/2.:,h L.,-J::•.....--,- ;;-• -; ;-• •-•-•••••;•••••--.;--%),- - ••••-•,•-r-,-.c.--•' -----• - ''^'''---'' ;-1'' •:;.•'1 : '''..-`.'..",-4.:.k.'.•z.:."• 2r-.•-•.-.--•:•;-.••• rtit'"71'1'' ' '.i..-...: !..-',..!”-.."./..;''h. %:7 ,•l't ' :.;..:2!'- ..,-.../ES... : •A'';:'ilr's`I''e..::: ' ;'• ...: 7-1.t..-.;'.1:it'?"- ''''' ''•''''' 1 ‘..,..; ••. 1%,-;-•.1-?•-4..;-c.--, --tt .4.. . .-:-.„. •:;•,..--.,/.::::...• p. • • . • ...• -- ..-• g•--. .•:. ... -., ;„...,__., sthiooriool ? " bbflR .. /.i,.1-1::::::' • , . omults-or. •mithied - ' • ; •- • • •: • • • •., •••• :. t-,•;-•.- ; 0, CI: : -2.::-;.•••.-.. •1• On!MI,'Sid- -0:143:of- Anil kV . 19(4, before* appearkd .;.,•.. r. .;„.,.........T.:;.,..:. '....',"..r;(7''''‘.-::":'•€•”:' . ... . - '"'"'77-•.:.'"2,.''..', "-.: •-.' • 1:••••":'',-".;"':1.-"*.r"*.,.fte-ii airldaialliisitnnii-Voo.oei/i back dill(*ire, '.. • '.. :.1,-, • . - Stat.'BIjbaS t Oasindie lei of the out.-iii ortipit-Ittni the(ha the isiti'-'' '• - -- P. • .)--- ...•‘:-.-, - "C.c: ':;',7.45:•.',.'7,:.;‘....;.1.! :- ' s Stets htidney Oiioioase 6! the itate of•Olteinns that the sad at find •to • • , ...' 1..,.:.:■.:.,;... 't■.7(-.1:1-t:“.4 .J".::.'. ' aaa Sant it th edal, f tati.iiavay Cendeln, ed a u said • . ^ Isetnigemt is aired and sealed la behalf at said State.by maid Cleaniesion.and • . •• ,'..,.........:.);,,..,... .,....,..-4t,-.....:”...4,...1.:A.:-.. ' ., . ._....... that the.said,Ohairsan *Cr the said toaniseionsia•salcotadedie said latateurdi..1-. • •-. to he tree act aid deed of 'aid State?by said State 11141neay deaselaslitiVerT • ernA-41,111■••a■ . .. 'bt'seinen!sumbor, I has&Taunt° set eby hand*I af .. kr.■.1v a ., • , •,.....,..............t i'-'. official seal the day,eadper lift above wiittan. .t.:1.-..:..,:tr-.'......:•_;:-... • _ " • td? a '''';':'-'-''Ll'i'' '.:. 7.,' ' • • "..!"!'-.1-F.".'"1.,--;/.77!'-`.`•!• , . -... . ..,.. • -.,-... ..,' etc—Li", - ' .1.i I -'5:..:...:.:.:::: .:!.....::...L.":::‘...,............ • ' "5- a• "-I am c)N,(1'39?-71:". • .',/• I. 4:-/ nr.., • -- bt,bottaissisn'esepitset .. .,....1. .., ,-;.. .1 ... .k ,........,,..,:,:,.. ....k."2:Tif...-.1.;:'.-_.if, L.' .'' ......4.,-- I ..:r I'.:••••••- '-'1.•..-4:,•-.1:”1-..-.7;;;.-. STATi Of attaor , . , . .' <-4.'''Or"•' • • 1 88 . ' • a017.11ti of LANE • • • •• On this_14,_,_day of NARK a 1962f peesonalif aaP• ' • . • -'''.7:....,;..., ;:-..) baton ral a notary palate Sit ad for said aeon!),end state, 4e within naiad • • . JAIltiliAVCS and AIJORLY L. Rant • • l a t e b a n d and Aro, t o p ersonal?'Imo=O° ko • ideo ' P.n.'''.d..°. ;pii, .i ,.. .f.;.11 ....... -:.."f,',:.•--.r.•:; who ezeotted the vithia instrument, awl who*soh petenhallf as •• . ..„.r.,/i .y;.... .! :,-....t. ..t:-?,.;no; ... ..to ge that they wireeuted the es.freely and volimtaelly fia•.tha uses amill ‘:ivi,;sijiiriti?4,: :.....1 ;;;." --,-7,..,..•:..?..,....v.:-..'..;.;, • • -. -Vltava* of band sal'official ilia the day 414 year'ADO, shoed - -;1.-{Lr9t u0 t i,•Y■• •• ,V ' .•4•-'11• L1 -.. L1-''7:1 ;-.2...-.;•:..::.;;;.,-.■,.- . . • . . - . ...ts..---4-./.;;;/,::,;;;:c • ; •,.--..1.-.;.,•;:r.. . • • • . . . . • . : • ' • - ' crt • . . ... r .a.1„...-...-... ". • • ,, • . • :.... " • •• . . ,_, _. , ..., ,,.., . ... . . • . • . . .•..• .• - • '.'''•.',....,,..: tr.;••••••,,' i . ' '. •. , ..• . . .... . • ••. .-. ... ..,,. .... .. .• !;- -f;,:■' •-,.7:1...:7..;.: ' • . .. (':'• -. ret*ir"..."41j...}....‘“...e..e4I'Itr'..t.n.. •• ' ".W.••'• .." 1..4 "..; 11.:.•. • - t'l•••.1 4 •t la• r fir;al.•list ,:. ..,'.:,, '1 A I I....'•..-- ;,..--;...-'1,-.-,:''''--; %-• '.: .-'.. . ' ' . ',• ..'•.':17' 1 !,;.'L., ...::'.',..'' •'2!'r .4:iv•;,-4■1::-:,--,•-•:,;••••:--,;Ly,:•••:.?,•\--';',--•:;••14-• • .:;-- ..,* • - •';,'••-•;':::••:17:5 7:•./...t':"..•.:•:'•?::;,•• s, ' ••••••••••'..-",:-‘•: :--:: -..-!,-...-- •-.,. • :-:_• -:. -,- •'.-.: :,- .1;•;.1., .•._.:•./.•;,..:....::- ... - , A' 2 2 7013 • r n a n J.6.,:;, .-aax. “a..4rn r �� • r MM. t r < .. r / 66'r;•8 r •. ♦r 4 ' :64,....40 01.0 01.7{1 ON1.1ei.thki 1 011.211 ee4e.�00u4.fra 811.-F bat i..IJt 1101+ ,. 'dtttecs ewyc.Anoa m r.AA a.va.. Hoar As:',11 M.'..! ipe4b y lrn. iz•:r.;:.1....5 • ' 1 - 3N N,','WSW. 4W,P.ri'.t h1l•.te N/nrAaA '° T.�j pP }h till t0� T the dFr J:M l•V`tlr+E.EO.s'vetE�ear lr. `p.+1� /^Y 1 d / .''AP OV�1 ii t hM 1 e J....x. p4 � , etW vJ� tcitY 4' r f 1 7 I e f 1..I .v t YI. J. •1S WY.f. • • ' 07Y 'e4••CCYt..t00 At ' ' ALSl2f � • .. • 8. ., . f . .. • . • t ,r.. 5 F 'J ) - . •9;�t:;.: - . ., .. ..- l , • .. • • •u .. • / -�I .. I 7,1' v1 t 1 ` ...'• . t J 1� ' -DIY t ,.....2.1.1L.n 1 t 4•.......•«w1`..t..q,l e. 46∎∎••yry 1 .— tf i t 1 - < 1' Z41 ' 1 srr. r' r1 dr dtsl r Urr ; ... 'r , �/•>C . ✓ . 1 J a' S A k ' v rVt. - 1. 1. !. + r rr' ,,..c. .:� kw. 8:s. J.r . 11:,.:::c 1. - !'i1 .t ,, .T. • I mr SUOMIjT" RECD APR 2 2 2013 .. . . ., . , • • _.- - . , -,-..,---,7,: 7".Z...7.47.-.1.3:.,•.---..------..7 _ ; ,..... z.;,... :4-.11-2.4-idtc=ct-.'w---"""..--.....•r....-‘4....-t-- -9'..- --=---7-7.. --. ..._ :..".r.::-.77•. "7•-•;7"=Y:77""';'.-..";"......4,:.."-:••;.••••ii,••••••: 7•7777ciii4 L.---: ... .; • . - •• 1rit.::.••••:n..4: .;: ri.,i- , • • ' A • .:• • • • •• . .. . •• ••••••:•-•-•,-”ar"*"-":••irri..-•,(,.,, i7...1, rrtIF,;;;\ 1•., r:::•-... i•••••••-•iNerie:;: ti ._,..,a..,.,..,....i: •-.4... it.,.!,••••..-• ..- 1pit:.4 pr-ThiLL!2,71.1 '.. :'PL'LL.i.l.L.....;',...1.L'., L,.,ticciA; I .','Ll', ,. '4'7' r.-::iLL4Lv'i:.:-. it'. r;4.i i"P.'44...:17,a1;:il;t1fiii'M 4.14'1.C.23.;;;Iti,:;I:ci . '2;ta.!;:::i!.. "101r.,,"';''crt k'.;:' 1 •1::...)•••••••: .••'71.•• •1•1,t"'•7:; 10..a.t;`,147-".•.''.;. 41(! ■;:.;tie.,,,;;,th i; :AtiA..50 i .y,. %2 ........:; i.. 14,.. ..i.,;‘,.-..;•,.....0 ri'-""Vt -'••''•'L -"- " .=`,“.tt.4-....tn-).;14-4.,,,,.. :It-::-..,.. tr L.•e„.qw, .,:%.r ,,,,.,;„,1..„,,,,.•..:0:t..-v+ir■.. . e.,,,:...!....,1;•,,,4 ..'....= •-- ;c[fr,-.;?.!:.?,,, .;.. •;. ,..i.q ci.,.y.4,,( ;?..:A..,,;,y;:i.,;,..!,:r:iy,•0!,',Yt“,t-ePtT at,•-• 4!;:n1,-.;;'::_■:::.*.. ..":&;!::42 L:•::.:,:4 , ,1.:,...:3. ,:.;;;;...?,,......; L,. ,.;,.1........, .., .,, .:Lr.44.,"1.- :..t. CO(,..'"fri11.+:::::472n,Cl:CIL.C1.1.:;,*)&;y::'-',7,i,V.1,c1.L.1:1,,,d.,,v,.LL1 :; . ;,l:Li.:::.;kt.;-Y.L7.r.c'LLJI . ‘V.4,.. L;.'.'. iL.;'. •••••:••!-::-tr••*" • irt !:r4vpr;10 . ',3;0•1,14.•,11'.t•i'..1(...,.•--;:!4!:;: ct.ri....),,--7.•:,.ir.-,v-!,:..;.f.,:c..1 ' ,..;:' k,i:gy,;,,...i.:-.,- ..h,.-: :•.....;;;.„.,:.;;-:*:1-4,R , -,ii.,:,v::to,, . :,..,,,xii;::::kt......... y -Ars,.:;,%.....,2-..:;:l ,,,..p.,L....-;::,,H,,,,,,.1„rh.-.......•••;••,..•3 iv • :::•••••'•••1••• •!••/•: "6' iiritigi:11.10'•11V•ki•••jAC4•:4•l•••!•••••rj:i.h:•• :1::••t1;nr:;r.i'!1.•••••?•.*‘•:i,r1•,14•2 k.•••••••:c ct•• •••••477:...:1:.;:itj•.;rif IS:.Ilrfr•/•,•,:•?.f?q,4!:1 C••,1:rri•...4 r:di r 14;''•I :•:r••• •••••'rlr:‘•:•••:‘'•!;:(:•;•1/2:::1•11.7;744•ii::"IWF;•211r4}:5■1!•1 ri%0:::.•' 5•4; r1•ill•1?:;:ATC•;•9/•qi;Al iri T,,,,c.ii, '6•Yat', ;',1:1421 :71'.'i;i;`;':W 1...1 . ..1L.C.•`R.*if':Ati2.44474.,%•4Th'.?Yt:',1:t%kViE' c::1.4'fi?.7.1tr.:.+1':-c`t,''';: 4i1);#1.,.fr4:tri,,;:cLPt7i,41'f.V.,17g:i:).4.1.t.',, :.i ,f;•;;:t;:,.,•:,;,..r4.4.-..,,.,...,-...55.:: .r,Afr.,.zzili.::...4,..„:;......Fox,,,,,,Iv,4.-iipo,As,,,,44ki..,24::,;;: , f..t.d.....i.“.,..<1., : wy,...,;•,(4.:N.:•::.,.., -...,......";:s:,......:,...:„..(,,::FRY ..•;Pc..,zr:-....i.•;:•tri•!, -r-.).:131,1:04...;f.'-..ittrO:q"At..;»,,Aki,-..:&o.:44;12/2;4(±,,Pfh. ' i* r.f.'-`.:tkli.47,..,..Vc.,,-,:+4.: ..%,,;i11;4'4,,,,,,Ti:fit.L.-..-;..!;"",...±72!;'' .. ...?......7.,!...::. -.7' • -•.;:7..•....,11r 4 .j:. 7gc- i "•:■•”7.7.1':::-.13.. "..;r.,..!••::,..r::.,Ati"•.(t,:i.r.;.2:21,..:dyiLI.X )•+.•:,:.A;;4:.... .. ....2,..x, •sr,-y,44 ,..7..;; „. .;;.;'"'....,-9,-„,,:,.,,,,:.:,,...”, ..„4 'c,.•:-,. `s -4.;,./4.wCa;t2-1-0..,•,;•Vr,.±14.,.,/, .;.;., ;;;X:1:M;q4z; i'-''.‘"v,vt1;04?-4P,!,j,47.:-h-cwrel...v.......:;:,,-,-,,;._,. ••••••':12••;•:CCQ''4.1"-• •. .1;t0i.:lliZi:1-S::::''rr:11;11-':);$%\•:•..r:11 /■rti51? 1:4,%;\.•Vig•fyi'lli•Wri=••;;Mirc-itg 11•, ,•1!at "-,-,;4',IYi,f‘:(•-•••-(1;i:r...rt.•••;:.1:. 1••;-,...•:..-.•..r.1.1 ,,:,.....1;.::-.7, , ,, ,,..r,.}.,!,„r„{,;...if.L..t.,•;.:4,;:::.J..1. .,1F.,,.. ".,kj..1.3122.41.,...?....:0i,..V2,i;..,V,P,if it;;.Sia,..:,,,r■••• c&'?”•••'...:.b*rfLie:•:•Z“irilir••••?(..?"r••••!V:•••Irt tt• ..•.••.••••••I.':r t:2.7.:.•C:..Y.':•:::'I,:•••■ .;‘•/•:74:4$•‘%ri(Pk'•:i ••'•je.r.);.:1::1 :1'4:‘;i:r.:91?!1.iik‘‘‘..'Ff4•1".•.• •• •' • . :tre'01/4 jr4V,W•i%tt,•i ir r.,•,,•-7.••i.4... ... %,....: :„ ....i;.•.., .....e....••••I.,.el., triNeli‘•1•S•,,:•i.t•ICPC14(•U/1•4?;11••• •• • • • • • I 1• rg-75,:r7a:;•••,r-••..g).::;•:, ‘,--rt,•„:..a i 7-:::-.."•.•.• .•''l'..t.I.L171441;•th..at.i'4.‘i.V.01;14•• • .‘11 •• • " . . • 1.• ;.;.,,4.....pel...; ::At t-z•i:•;/4 4":"ICA .."..,'":`•":"7.':;:,". ;4 ?!•.:■;::1.:%;!.7:- •::71?-;.t 4 4:A A09. I i'ij-II,1"S.1/4 Ci"., j4 i. .. :.-113! .• r r• •:rtt ,•-•,i,,,Li.d•y.;:...),...y.e.y..zre,..*), .;.::., . ...,...:: ft j"S'a.,thrt-,4■4";,•,^Wrilepttf...... L":■•;• :".f' .'"'..•;°;!!".., ,19. .:117',.,1:111.,:tal;Iiiitgisiiii . 1111 a -.......:•:.-;:c...----.:::1: ,..v.:),,to..,N,i;Ittli.,wo.risa- .- v.:•;•,,:',.•:•/y.-:::::: •,:•(....5:•:,,,g,.,:yt 0,4,,...,,A...:: -li• 9 9 t.. tia A 1• •i ":;,:. 3 a •)--2'.9:-..rQvcr•4':•-“,-,(t..acrit47,11,.t.,....z-:•"le.:1:,%1 " - I 3 Fii..:-... ...-......?..".•-.v,, 1,03.,-iik,.1■,,ite...:..aiti,s, , _ . jg• . ' • ik, '•,p•;:t;ii`ir,..i.,„•g;;;AVyi3■11i•P 1 .....'V:9,-, ..-•;:y. ' •4.:444711‘...,1`rf.r•"•N"t‘Hat- ' •.'"• ••••• • n•• .‘ 11N. •4 irb•Tt:41V)•44.$11°••;;'r l• •• 't-••••:.••'••:r •1; r‘V::•.!rrr;\Ir::c‘: );' ...;2ile,•;167;'Z.).LC 41k3;1?i4\441•fr( 1 gin % •n 4 ' leitilfSik r::•Vt4114:4)/41.#3;:fikln 1.irtf.•:::•t"r"... 'Xt.Lrr,••••....C.• ....•4.•,:•.• ?•%••1:;j1Cg•;•••nrki••ri4t7;rik 4141? i 114 1 N . F.: • •••V r il;1 rf•••r•Q'Z'IgtVii.lAr,114:•;•*••• r •'....'•'•€••••7,7*.. t:pj• C,1;.• Ci•.'5•90. . 2.6ekViiIi4kril±:?lfgritti • i ill :j.*.t.,, ,....e,,,,--,..,,,.. ,.,..k..4.11,.-::1/2. ::•:;-•...:.• • f•-474)...:■:;■;T:rt,7 .t.,:4;:•,,,,is-..., „iv .. . • a ,...,411:5c-y:!.•• •'9:4••- .-;■•;:,v4;;•11.....4.4,-.41•44,76.7,....; II ak .• • I .,••,t3,4,4, "„,,iv.-...?„, , ..,....:2.2.,..:,..::: ,,.s.............•,....,,..„ .,..... ,t‘rie.r.th.w4.... . /I 1 R. • • iv '4:Fr7,-4.9.1 17.F.f..*V.,,ilii, it. '1' i• /-I i"ck‘:7.,,,.'41.,7, '!5.,470i,,t4's"qi: , •71".."..4..--_,, r,t,..„-,-... .-,..f,-... . .(,.,?....,:z. /4iirsd:IPirs,p1.1,r....'41 ,i. I tit:,it Ohirce1...-lia‘i--rr.r•ir!',1;- :tr.."ItA,,,troph;ee,,v.,•1 i„..:92.;;,......„ ',:::2:74'.4.4vt:-1:..1 • 'L'iii,L..11144;44.41,.e..,:hi/ijn-lfr.114 t.L. "..c.,,Litcltib,1,1,L. , nwri.',R9..-i• 0.;,47..iiiii,;,...•%•!;,;2,4,..Q.i4411,,....rciturv•.•4•Httrit:!! -4-.1:..-4.....:. .".:1.."'' ''''..'•;:::::: :"P 111441.ji4Vic/14(42ablq;;Ltt4/11 ;Art. gat14:104%.44• N.U.L' ''tql1Pj;:q.:tritkiii0kk.V4"4.*:it'At.1.?..• L,::,..■.:;;;;;?.:t... •444.`+514,-.A•litA:t5.4.1tit4;cr•tr,$./.1.:t.' tolcac..1,1. ,,,,,,,,.&;,,.,,,..„.; '`;:•••'''•',cri;;; ... q.:14;11144k1/4**.'ittliA.-;•a At1,41.`,4•44!,t;ItiW.,4.ff),•••:44i,stesiitek,vs(v2.1;,/41‘sm.,Ati,40t4i6,:,;;:„tikal.;i1vr! ' 77:77r,.7 .•!$.:3.-•:11'.C..•;•''54•-1-.1,'.••‘: `41Poi.44.1,41c214,41.1•4g4Vpi:;%47tt!tr•Opeick-littia.1,:•;.iftr.V4q)..tagAt'iliht;it'A ii"1,'t''ittril: ”r-i:•4:-.4';;&- r•-....--n.:.A.:-.-t:•ur: it 4-,.,"tdiAtiirfirfri9•44,714,E.;',.7,7a!,••mi,X,..p?;,vilVMM11,4.1,1•i•tifY41: ‘0;;t14■4.0":4:.t1"?lia4'i !kinVrAtifi3A-Vo.i r••••!;•••-•-- 91,='...,. v.1.,..,:ty--:,:drip,•:$.;;.-En-,,,pc,.41.,•,.., ,•:,,,,;•:•,..iik c#,..A:A04.0ys.0.9+pil .1-,.:Ah:).;-.' :,, 1,Thlt 1,t1i1;%if,Att.,..€06A.t.:Ntrite,!1:1_a,p';Jib Ipike-qtri.1.-4/(.ipP.I.:4:51,,:e.!ji,Alatn'Ait:‘*.Vitititirly1;,...'41,011. 2^.2,:,.,•• t:y..4. 4C",-rar Yt.;-"'A".#.1.='‘. ' 41Ati:**IttP41;1111."1, 41r.7-a:',".!.,b;t1rI.V-43 C1(4.4119i.:44.4',Vard7t.”1,41.eriil# 4;171;titiSII:S"P.- t":115:grial' ."''''.' r..-4.. “"'' ..."trie"'"44'' •IrrirtrAti‘nl"'IOU e..441,-V1/414n0".}tt.11:0„,.:,.5.,,. i.. pp.,.,...A,L.,tr. ,c2.4,4: .„.,.. _,.....„ .:11-1,91.E;r".1"..!.:*_.;:i.1.2..;?: :el P14111;4');\111fri&r..4447);ITik''';31Cq%11.?:>44.417.;*T0i7141,--41;141451`4.(t494)*(11;411/:'11/0.1%):,34.)1;A:3,411a:if:rt,.rtIttflti""5.4,(t;PiAlicifa; ... 1.47•=i7.-1".7..c..: X 'Pal wr-r4vicncA.. op-Ve. r •P'),4 aft.tifkm74 ct1r:r.o.■••••Q.4.1+,2.1rt^A.`War.!ye'I •.).1:“oli,rb...,1,0 \LL---"r..4L,:. '.;1•L'''..:':t5....."::':::rrL1:"..7 •F Vi,' ' :Lit"';L\611.:4:4•Lk.ait24..f!.4:,)}. .11:::?,igt;;1?: ,VitZW.7).1"".ittl'klA:97b;,,O.:V7:11N.”:;-.7:;-;.-,1,41,;,.,„il :*•;•••':-:''..7.-I'•••27.•‘ " relf.r.0,41P11,-ier;•91•,144;-4•441.4..t.i....p.,9S-......4rertc4,,;•4•ret:.•;er..1t.....,.. ric,,,,p•;;;:-;.:•:itt• ":4,,,,•.;:,,tipktr,;,,..v..„(j.r.., •:.••-•.••••••••V‘■••;•••••:‘ •: la .......‘k,i,), .,90,....... . .,,e),E,..,.:,,A-;,211..,t,RN....e..-9,-,-.4”..c.1.1.".:1)211:401;';,'• -,:,---. . tr•Obt h Ce fr•1'110';cei.:1:;;J•c!...e1A=OW“•1113.41;::?;;;°iA*1?ff"..A:eg!:*•;1011'17:tliVilciiiicl'Le...(4,N•441,i,/,';:RCI042.• '4•••?1,:.•:"::”.:-.• ;.•••:•••:::/..;•••:::•:.fh ‘,••••:cSttic.4414491:itcyittiniPii.1714.•:‘,A•••24:4•14,442!;.',Ikia411S4R1(21:41.4114%ittly."4.d:t•41.:VAIAT.:ilifti,....W rf:':::"...7..: C.:4,11:.•"“.r..?1,tt(rri; • F:11r4i, 0.i.ritl',tArl'•04}faktICIVVI'S'i*Ifi'&CP; Cfriji:14;.;14;q4H4MIV°41.3.4!W'Itk7Af"ARCIV:ti. :: .',"-`xt:'"=": .-7:::::;j; !L'•1?;cZ:Lr,-. ' LPi.t,k AtAt4ii,:kti';`);3*"*.tklhb.V`ri4tte;vej.ILMICA;List"5.altrA.\-.114:1 ,70.1.14•Yrk4' qi,141.14.1•5t.:'- .&;:."...:;„--.. L.';:.A.:.7j:.:L....L...:!;,...f., ig1;;;I',,,.1,;!1.11.rNlteA'Jkli,"■'1 .111j0.1:7rriktil 4.0,7t4Vd,41'PfLii.4041-4.etro(141.1ZOWM.,14k1t)ArVf(l' ".',....f:".::- 11-';'''T..r'::;tizrr:‘•-; . 1,;.iciii=1,..tprirpaitft:ii:Nr,iirr-07s,;),..virs•rtrie!is.)3,0tgarosig.W.,iltrer&rctlfAilwisq.9,..?••Fge.r5,4!`eP. .i.i.!!!"Pit .-;-:.:.;,:-..• ...t- 4:YM"--4,7-,i."-:-..aTi• '44;tileiltktieSV,6.. "r;4:4'f'OcilliS071.LItlaVAA.Ii.1■0•I'W14ttarr".011101:1410et)P4i71,■ji161370:14""5Pq'tg;j1V4tP■. ' '"'":.-.7"‘ °..3.;';:i.i':" J;t17.;.; ;`INWS.*51(....1WiitICTYM944:34411PirOjpjettiggtic4.VA'btitOliPitgli,4•IN'tjillg1/42t...:,,A),M0.417hiltPk; ."..1-:': .-;!;:2•• ,r;1.•;;:t.'"'' .. 11::,1.:qi FA ilicii r,;,.4,z.v-A,P.`0-1,?,:liy,yttr.in$4,,,,,,,ls,.:,v.icAii,f,4,,,15.1:1mteg.it.o.(twt,N.W,ctDidtzit.i.A,..,,iii;;;:,>). . .....„,-..-.-1.-:, .....- •••-•-,-,c-,-',;-, ti it-T2 I.Si.et-.I,,\,}.,..,•4t.•,,-,„.01,6);:•,, ..-1,..,,e,,4-.„,,44,4-,f e.go■„1-4 •tika.,•,-,,„,/ • r.<;-.0.• .:1441:01::•.ViAi.srPLi,,,Az.4--"fir 7' .i, ......,.•- */:;:,•11*:::-t=r,:-.-::: i-slt.N.Tc:7,444,0ilik}liC:PAtIc'11,A"r31P:iiKVIca4'tit•4+.,14'VrtiNNI:(61';'..:i 41■c4s41$1,-,q.i1/2-4..":"A•..le-,:. •,:•.,,,,.,....:...• tc."..7.-:.•••:71;.'ff•••••• 1•,A14,1=rciNf r•,';.."'tiA',1,1P:244:lut,inajl-t:41416hff::46.0,„Ri.,ASPz.,c,,,,',.2,,,14,:,,,cr•-4V1p,,,,,-.1 x.(711,,I,;,-;\.,,):5;A.:,44-4-49:9-..,-\liz*Ir3c., ..: , ..,. • --- r:::.,", ,:.;,..,. ),,•,,,:,.1.1•<•,11.1.2!1.-p,v. s,,,,,,i; 1%,,,",,,„wioloci-n,,-;:,/177-c?, (41/4?"Ft.'4161.t."4/9 t:I d'Pl.';.1,1APIVii.;+.:'...14".'670fr").VC..k;':4,4?t•• .‘:-..!-'. '....!.:::.1..r:j.,,,,,,...,:.,:,:.1. '''.'.11, ti:Ii`trie.),e1AVIyVVAP67.:11.W.A141.gt#,Lni...,..1.14:..0 d.04.4).e.'114 1.7..".taa'•tai..u;it.ii:44..41eit'V':ktPlit:.1.,PIZ.4.--"A;,. '' .': -.*::: :::.--.L':::.•;!:tzt.4;ft.(xN,{iiisr.,: ::1::;;;.:0-4uisrp,...A..._kpo.AlstvatircizogilAk*b*-Apiet•ricfr/J.c.eigkilyiitiN.,:RA i 2.,.:.-:....:- :.::::....,.:::.::::ir..-,,..;:... ,;:.s.,);,;(6.1...v,iirArppgit42,4)*,,,;ttttmu.r•Acvkii.:k 10/240LtgLIII*4-04/5isier)tiLCrii'L4ifikeilleCITtP31 ill, 1-...'7: t , , .p.s4,1ct,:fltr ,71.1,,:tqpi;f44,ikti,tifikt..),.*2101,j;,..,y,V. ..04.V■ i,.,.\,./.111,,t;,'‘,S,1111,1•N`,..trik1:lititt,4:;i2.1+;.WWJP):-6'‘'1+1.141:!:'ti. '1- • r•:•:%••I::Y.:•:•:rr■r'•••; tie•'LTA ikil;Q:i l'il.r4t.,ir\•;;Ottn•T(Nit •}•1441 tit'1••)•al . .. r . • . i, . i ,. ..... '-',....:',•.-7.:.!..•-.]:-r. I.:. r!iymi;.(ii:;,ta.S i.,.a. ..• -••-• . . . .• . 11 . . .,...., .,.... . ...., , . . , ‘'.,'i...‘:'',.:Zi',.--..., •. '. •' "•• .. . • • rj . . . . .,•=:..hl,r;''T' 1!:. ..........;,... •,.....-. ...... ..... . . • .• ...• • . . • . • •■•• •. • •• •• Tt•:•CI.C.::'....:.:::.;•,••;•••• . . , : ......f:t t::..:.......::::±:4::''''." -....“. .• . " ' ••I ' .•'• •'••••.: ‘..t:::. ••••• •:•••Z..''••••••.•:°•:..........•....1 "Ci,....l;::::•:,:.;•:::•••:.•I:,r.-..7....titr•-•t7•IE• , •;:L..••-•-:.-tj:''' if:":4-Th Z..•:777:H.::•4.M.7.1:::•Z:47-•,•?•••••••:::■77,..,;.••4:-: ;.....nrtt.,rp:;,.:•„..„.........#7..., ,. .........v.,;:::::7...... ,:. ., , ......":'"-Sr::•:1;m. ••:•••;c•••••:.. .'f..t.t•••:.2•••••::77•7‘.7:=5...;77....Thir•:.: :••••• •••••• •• tr'•.•t•••:::. •:'. 1.• ' . • •••••• •••,.• • ' • • • • ‘ s p .„. . , ...... - . - APR 2 2 2013 , _ . . 1111 • . Attachment14' • • • . - • - ' • - • .• . .. ' • . •• form S,St7—IQM - ••• -• A APprr•rosachPrermtIo —. ..?.1.;;..?...c-.1-4....--1 s be Wigned-bitetemvocC/ - - • . - • . ••• . • . - OREGON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION • . . . . . . . . . . -, .. . . . . Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road • . . . • . . • . . . • • -saws Bayes . - , Applicant, . (Name et porson,pm.or corporation) ', • . .. . . • • • - apqte 2 ' 40ation Oily - s _ . • of • Oregirblundei • . • • - - • • the . . . .. .. . the previelons Of ORS 374'405.to.374.325,hereby declares represents to. .'Statk bt•Oregent.isi 3110 through•Ita..SiAte.Higlivirty.„ • Commission, that he is the wristM=0CM certain ,eat-property abutting upon liataithighway at the following described location, ' . '. and that he has lawful authority to apply forthidpermit and to rattiest and 'authorize the State of Oregon to •construct such•-ap- . .. proaeh read, and•makes application Stir permit to construct and maintain'a f•rnYAncleperntopent* approach toad connecting said . .. 1.1.• :• -of- • property on the • 3441t •"- side.of •-•. -- • - - - : 4nglivr4311 • c•. . . • • . • . . 126 • • - k. . • . tSAAB . . No. 17 Route NO.U.S./CMG= . ,in ..ComitY,Oregon,between/UW/0e - - • Stowe and. Soringfield ' • . - • •,and.ntore particularly described as • •. . . - WI ' . . . . • being at Mile Post , HighWay Engineer's Station 1,9186 as indicated by tharilmenslatis,figures and sketch map or plan contained herein. Dag. 68-3-15 .. - •- • . . The applicant hereby agrees that if such permit is.granted,to fully andfalthially..cornplY With.all thaProVisions•and regula‘. Lions hereinafter sot forth and such other reasonable rules or regulations,as may hereafter be promulgated by:•Ute.-.0regOn State Highway Commission governing the construbtlononalotertance, and operation or use-of:sttoh approach road, and further agraea.to bear all expense.ot construction and maintenance of said approach road; I% : .• . • • • - - .. • . :. . •• • • . • . . . . . ..: . . • Date 14242 . . . • • • • C...10ei / ' ' ' . . • . csism4Inc:at,,p,to or to; •1 toonten7) . . . • • • • . • - • , . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. • ' . • . •• . - , . . . . • - . , • . . . . . . . . By . -. • . . ••• • . ... . , • . . . . . . . . . • ' , . • . . . . . . . . • . • • . . : • . . . • - ' • . GENERAL PROVISIONS -. . ... • .. • • • : • • . - . . . • . . . • . . . • •.• . • - . ' I. No approach road or otherlacility shall-be constructed upon the highwayright of way Until a signed copy-of this Permit Is .• returned to-the applicant. • . . . .. . . . .. . . •. . • • • _ . • • . . . . . . 2. The word Engineer as used herein shall mean the State Highway Engineer or his duly authorized representative . - • „ . . • , ,. . . . . - - ' • • '-'-• • 3. This permit is granted with the specific understanding.that the (Applicatnt shall be responsible and liable for all•accidents, . . damage or injury to any person or property resulting from the construction,maintenance,repaianperatIon.ar use Of said approach • . road for which the applicant may be'legally liable,-and that the applicant shall hold blameless and Winless endshall indemnify-the . State.or Oregon,its State'Highway Commission and members thereof,lts officer* agents and employees nainst any and alyclairna, • • • demands,-less,Injury, damage, actions and coats of actions Vthatso.ev,er;whichtheyor any Of them may eustain by reasons of the acts, conduct or operations of the applicant,his agents or entployeel:In.cMlnantlon with the.construction, maintenance, repair, operation . : or use of said approach road. - . .. , . . ..• . . , • . • • . .• . . . . . .. . .. .. . •. 4. The coxistruntiommaintenance,operotion.and use of said approach road subject to the piramount•bontrol of the legislature •• over said highway, and no right.or privilege herein r Sante-rt.Mall be deemed or..cbpstrued...to he beYrnid.the reach or authority of•1' • the legislature to dontrol the:said highwaY;and the oppliortnt In accepting this permit ascots It IttiOwing.that the rights and•privl- • loges herein•granted may at any time be defeated-and abrogated-by legislatIve act.- . • . . . „ . . . . 5.-The stopping or karking of vehicles upon the state-highway right:of way-for tbe.servicIng of such vehicles or-in further- ance of any business transection or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. Minimum set back distances as ahown by. . .. dimensions on the sketch map or plan herein for btiliclIngs,.pumP islands,or.any other atrUcture now existing-on or hereafter placed on applicant's property, shall be strictly observed. NO APPROACH WILT:, BE CONSTRUCTED FOR OR BY ANY APPLICANT.- FAILING TO CONFORM. . . . . . . • • . • . 6. The number of approaches to a single property shall be limited ton minimnm that:will.allOw the property to acorn- modate and service such traffic as may be reasonably antiiipated. NO•APPROACH ROAD WILL BE CONSTRUCTED :Td OR PERMITTED ON A HIGHWAY SECTION•THEREOF -WHERE RIGHTS- OF ACCESS TO OR FROM THE ABUTTING . PROPERTY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE:STATE THROUGH CHASE OR GRANT OR WHERE RIGHTS OF ACCESS HAVE NEVER ACCRUED. . • • . - • - - , • . . . . . .. •struts out word or word;not applicable. . • PRE-SUBMI1TAL • • • . . , . • - APR 2 2 2013 . •- • - . . • . ... J • • . 7. .In,the construction.of an approach road'under this`permit, either by the,applicant or by the State at the expense of the applicant,.the State.recognizea.the applicant'9 ownership Of. he materials'entering.into said construction, If for any.reason (other. . than:reconstructlon or wldeeing at the filgliway);it leter'bocomda necessary or:desirable Ibr the State to remove sucl approach road, it sheltie removed by the State-at the expense of the.applicant,.and-credit will be allowed for lath materials,if any,as are'salvaged • for re-use by the State; - - - - 6. If In the.event of the reconstruction or widening of any highway,it becomes necessary to remove, alter or reconstruct'the approach road constructed:under authority of this permit,the cost of such rem•valor replacement to a like Width and condition will be borne by the State. Any widening or other-improvement of the approach road-at the applicant's request shall be done only tinder authority of-a ngiv permitsnd-at the expense of-the applicant.. • 9. The construction of the approach road by the applicant,his agent or contractor, (if authorized by the-Special Provisions of this-Per-pi);will'be.permitted-.orly when the appllcant.furnishes evidence'of having at his disposal adequate and suitable•equip- . , - .. ment fovdoing-the work.anclturnishes satisfactory.plans and.!Peelficet(ons. . _ _ - - - - 10, Unless permission.for construction approach road In whole or 1n part by.the Spplicant, his agent ent or contractor, ie - • apecificelly grantedln the'Sperlal.Ptovisipne•of Una permit;-the Uonetriietlo,t of said approach.road.will be done by.the State, 'Including the furnishing and.placi"ng of all;tmaterials necessary for the completion of Such.portion of the approach road that occupies • .- the highway right.at way;,specifically:-drainage faculties,-dirt,;rock,'surfacing,and curbsor other materials hated in Special Yro- ' visions or shown on thaaketch map herein, . - 11. No materials Will beordered'by the,State'until this appl teat ion,•completed`and.accompanied by hash;money order, ot- • certified.cheek,'payable fir the Oregon State Highway.Commission, in the amount-hereafter stated ih the Special Provisions, ie, approved by thee.tistriot:Maintenance Superintendents.No construction will be undertaken by the State until this permit is . ekecuted and returnedtto the epplichnta l conditions nd.all specified.herein have been complied with: • • . •13. If the actual finel coat ofwork done.,or materials furnished by the State in construction of all or any part of the approach road is more or less.th'an the estimated-cost thereof;the difference between the actual cost.and the estimated cost will be refunded to the applicant-or wilt be palette the State by the applicant Within 10 days after receiving-a bill'therefor,as the case may be. 13. Upon completion otsaidapproach'r0ad,the applicant may perform additional-minor work, such as seeding or planting of . Island, working.orcutting edges'of said approach;.eta, provided that such-work is-done in a-manner so as to cause no interference to traffic upon the highway and liperformed at the applicants sole expense. • 14,. The entire expense.of maintaining,said approach road shall be borne by the applicant,who is hereby permitted to make minor repairs, such as the correction_-of irregularities in the surfacing of the approach road,repair of curbs or walks,'etc., pro- •. vided.that the maintenance work.does`not'interfere with•or Interrupt traffic-upon and-along the highway. No work'shall he-thine ' and no-equipment shall:be used by the applicant:on the shoulder Of the highway at any time,.unless applicant shall.have first secured - apprtiV'al from Mite Superintendent of 14falntonance of the district in'whipit tne.approach.road 14 located._ • • 16. No unauthorized signs shalt placed,permitted or maintained by the applicant upon any portion Of the right of way,nor shell any signs not-conforming,to law be placed,permitted:oribaintained on property adjacent to the right:of Way.(ORS 977:840 - and.483138):..Where standard:warning signs, such as "Lo:ki;Out for Log Trucks," are required by this•permit or other regulations; or-are ordered by-the Engineer to provide warnine:of the approaeh road;'eueh-signs shall.be furnished and placed by the State at - the expel-ilia of the applicant., _ ._ . - - Ig.' The planting:et placing of•Other adornments not;prohibited by law oh the island or any portion-of the right of way ' by the applicant shall be limited-to low growing shrubs, grass, or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision inithy direction. Nd curbs, posts or other structures'shall be placed on the highway right of way within ten (10) feet of the edge of pavement. . .. . . 17. The applicant hereby authorizes officers, employees, agents,' representatives•and contractors of the State Highway - Commission to enter upon property'owned or leased by-said applicant for the'purpose-of constructing the said-approaeh road. - ' 18. The word "applleant"'and;.all. references to the applicant contained herein shall include the plural when appropriate..• PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • APR 2 2 2013 J S • • 2. APPROACH!ROAD: Type of surface .._.!&I;P.t...GM11.g.. Top width _._..__.._....45, Surface thickness jF in. Pipe required? -......_._:._too.. Slam. Length - Wind Mln. depth cover Bridge, catch basin or other unusual drainage facility requied? .. 114"1 • • (If so,Mullein on attached sheet and submit sketch or specify SW.Plan Ho. ........._ _......_) • Wyse Treatment of island,if any.-...-...... 11_ .,_A 1 None Kind and amount of fill required ._ Exc. • -__a 1:•;" . . •Materials to be furnished or Items of work to.be done by applicant ,. " _.- i } ,:. • n-11 IIAdepaelllvony,or a uoinecla le unman _._. it aL 1- • e.II,t� . Materials to be furnished or items of work to be done by State - Ccmtsti'uat left turn beau! widen (:ayamofata,rebtdld our bap es ! attached Text _ ust..._:.._ ........._t...._...._......_.._._...._.__..._.._... _... IlArl weVId11R or If noon,state"none•') Estimated cost of State work �' •� Check;/VIO0Osta?amr? Blleek- .. • S. HIGHWAY SURFACE: Type..-_A�'.................._... Width._.... .._....... .... Curbs? .........._. iu to. tow bee) . Shoulder-width ._.._.............._......... Oiled? ._ R/W-Width of this side...__...._...1.._......_.._....-_-.._..........__........... ........ limpet Alignment at approach road ..._ ((w wisest,or can douse.curve left or NAV 1 le r;03°t . Sight distance (from Pointe feet back of shoulder or curb) '�` - ahead '?t)a......_..._.._...... ....back Right of access purchased or otherwise obtained by State?Thditxittile Dr-Awe" Pall bPill 1"DCkIli0efl,.,, -. Nature of business to be served.by thin approach_._......__. Industrial Yee is adequate space provided for parking vehicles off the WW? / ._. .7_,_) ""r --- - Data •Permit recommended ....................._...__......._. ./(>laidetb1nlnt danl 'Permit recommended se....._...._.._._.. Da to ... ........_.-.h..,._ Walston Encinem9 1 AUTHORIZATION OP PERMIT in consideration of the applicant's agreement to comply in all respects with the regulations of the State Highway Commission covering such operations, permission is hereby granted for the construction of the approach road or driveway as described in the above application and Special Provistous, said eppreach road or driveway to be in accordance with the regulations herein sat forth. It satisfactory expressly ion, It is that this understood at atl this permit isoissued s blect totthhelapproval of local,city its town authorities having joint supervision over said street or highway. OREGON STATE IYCMI _ Dated l.�_-:.._..&..... ..11.... By..„......c---1,. Slate Printing PRESUBMUAL PEC'D • • APR 2 2 2013 • • • . SPECIAL PROVISIONS • ' 1, The approach road covered by,this-pormltshalt be single/fit and shall conform to the dimensions and figures indicated-on • the following or atteehed sketch map,dress-seat andlsahedule of--.dimensions,and shall be Constructed to the grade established by the Engineer. • •, . " - - . . .. . . S.1'NGrL,E APPROACH ROAD ' • . . Right Angle or Skew Construction Optional • Curb Return or Orep Caro Optional When Qurb Regaind Qe . . Vb. - • S N•Right of Waft,Line) . - - . s 01--►�� . 4. . • • . .tdge'at Should!. - .. .eats of9hou/der� - i• . 3- ar d - f • �r } r r �J{'_t u ) r t�f t t.r' �. �,e.a+c+*mK'' .i-��[TJ'°� ym„^. {slxr+i! 'y ytidS DUAL APPROACH ROAD DUAL APPROACH ROAD NOT PeRMITTED IP TOTAL HIGHWAY PRONTAOE`/S LESS THAN faa PEST ,�• . • Ri iit Anylo ar Skew Construction Optional I e . Curb Return or•Crop.Curb Optional:When Curb'Required • • W • D2e Maxb5 Pumpa of � Skew to 6 0)� m:@C.. - r ppm el. R/ohCafwoygj 4 / Y t IL \Li—f/1 --"4- • Edge of Shoulder Edge of Sho _,1-∎� • - - I ��q i• . M Cal.." of •orem Anf or near et-6 of mown• tro/no/ono . k 4 , d L V iP 1 t : tt t � .t --•SCHEDULE • OF' DIMENSIONS • • • - . Applicuble to Single or Dual Type Access :• , .. : Di nien elan' .. Minlrnumy....•. . Ma xlinutn. Approved " • . • . . De 8,.. No nd 101�... R e' 15:. • M None PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • w is' ' .. . 50': 451 APR 2 2 2013 s .,.�_ '90:� None .- nngie of skew so` as 9O� . . +Ono.common approach to adjacent property may be permitted provided .W dos naf exceed-BO. • .t a41ke out wore not applicable. • Attachment '5' • • / • � , 2 ISi 0 0 t ,iiLd tl it;o r o , m it. # 11111 E mtt A• a It W e lc a.�. m• •Q 1 Q N en 1 !ill it m flail t, s O % L i 9 S � %e id A. lir • • • 62 £21. ` t. to r, - AA o y hid ie j �� C @ii�'sayi. NS`s{'7 W $W � 4a glig ul ill !J1J11" iti 'i II;3 ho g I j 8 ` o � i u9 Ma.• a .� nM O 0 ! Dag (111 ; -11411 •dgel . k .: p >- I 4t-i- W a1 Q a a_0 a 4 1 ? Z Z 2 2 rr ; m Ifc Z $ y° Qg� 0 1 ~Se Q et z o cJ4 41 � e I I I =1 aaoX jichiL'&dil 8'3 m � 0 � 9 7 18 c a 11 B 0 N o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ * ❑ iit sI M i a 4 3 8 ao� � _ a1 go I 1 i ;s Its l h1JWi lIII I ¢ o = z C $ l m � $_ , M x i l i i ti gf t it ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 13 f , : I At 8 8 e E 71 PI • Attachment '6' • �' WESTERN TITLE & ESCROW COMPANY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED KNOW AU.BY THESE PRESENTS that MERRII.L LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.FSB Successor Trustee of the ElahA3L Armes Trust Dtd 11/27/2001 Amendment 215/04 hereinafter called grantor,for the consideration hereinafter stated,to grantor paid by Alpesh Patel and Kemal lU Patel,as tenants by the entirety hereinafter called grentos,does hereby grant,bargain,sell and convey unto the grantee and the grantee's heirs, successor and assigns,that certain real property,with the tenements,hereditament and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any way appertaining.situated in_County,State of Oregon,described as follows,to•win 11 03 3433 00700 acct 0 0299436 17 03 34 33 00700.901 eat 01507331 See Attached Exhibit"A" To Have and to Hold the same unto grantee and grantee's heirs.successors and assigns forever. An grantor hereby covenants to and with grantee and grantee's heirs.successors and assigns,that the real property is free from encumbrances created or suffered thereon by grantor and that grantor will warrant and defend the suneand every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons claiming by, through,or under the grantor. me tine and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars,is$390000.00 In construing this dad,where the context so requires,the singular includes the plural,and all grammatical Qtanga shall be made so that this deed shall apply equally to corporations and to individuals. In witness whereof,the grantor her executed this Instrument on July . .2007 ;if grantor is a corporation.it has caused its ame to be signed and its seal,nay.affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by order of its board of directors. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OP THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN T11.3 INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REOULTIONS. BEMIS SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,1118 PERSON ACQUIRING FEB TITLE TO ThE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WRH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY P ANNNO DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR SOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED HORS 70.34E MERRII.L LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.FSB Successor -- Trustee of the Elal*t.Armes That Dtd 11271200I AmendmeHt ) ' Brien Sagllmbe.V. al Estate Officer -T STATE OP Btl3E County of MB0.stP- ,su This Instrument was acknowledged before me J'KLV 3,a007 by Brian Saglintben V.P.Real Estate Officer for Merrill Lynch Bank&Trust Co.FSH Successor Trustee of the Elaine H.Armes Trust Dated 11272001 Amendment 2/5/04 / .••= BARBARA A.CORRADO , Notary Publk Comprsgan �,,,,,�yy� MARY PUBLIC OFNEWJERSEY, roof As: c„'V. My commission expires //T7/ t. gbgblggyppg FlDlta go 17,9018; t • z 1 Y7 _ ARgrpecOrdlADRatumTo: '' Mille tit4INnwggncsn W In Cuing a.44'•Oy' 4 y r f 497 0.,.5,RS Suites 340.Caws OR 87401 Until*Sap Is mut ad MI to,late a SMB be ma to Coa folbwaa Weise Mpab Patd mad Kamd11 Paid �aJI �p � Division of Chief Deputy Clerk MA7'R1DhWfranKtnl Lans CoasttyDeeds and Records Cletergo be. q-1L03 1111//11 I I $31.00 07/0512007 01: 1 nSUBMIITAL REC'D RPR-GEED Castel Stn.. CASHIER 01 $10.00 611.00 $10.00 APR 2 2 2013 • • • Lawxaa •A• • • Beginning at a point in the North line of the Ears Sweet Donation Land Claim No. Bs, Notification No. 3284 in Teeaatip 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, 14.45 chains Boutb73. 30, West from the Northeast comer thereof and running thence South 5.44 trains to the center of the sloughs said running Easterly and Westerly through mid claim, thence up the said9claimtt ee•chains, to the North Lite of said claim an with cnc East uthi7P of 30' Nest 1.05 chains to the place of bginning. being a part of said Donation Lend Claim in Lane County, State of orgon. ALSO' Beginning at a point on South line of Pacific Highway right of way South 0. 03' East 87.8 feet from a isiS�whi74 113, Weostl831.66 feet from teetNortheast est cornerlofmthe which Donation Land Claim No. 68, in Township 17 South, Range 3 Nest of the . -,willamette Meridian, thence along Soutm Sine of Pacific Highway right of way North l ug. 01,�nce South Nast Nest 551.3 ter, thenceONortht0•603' Nest 330.1ater of feet,Laee, moss or less, to point of beginning, all in lam County. Oregon. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • Attachment '7' • WESTERN TITLE & ESCROW COMPANY OF.LANE COUNTY EUGENE OFFICE•497 OAKWAY ROAD,SUITE 340•PO BOX 10960•Eugene,Oregon 97440 (541)485-3568•FAX(541)485-3597 engemQwenermille,com DATE: June 15,2007 WESTERN TITLE&ESCROW COMPANY OF LANE COUNTY Report No:50-0174107 ATTN: Lisa Lemonds Your No:50-0174107 • 497 OAKWAY ROAD SUI T E340 = --. -- - . - - EUGENE,OR 97401 - PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT STANDARD OWNER'S POLICY $390,000.00 PREMIUMS: STANDARD OWNER'S PREMIUM $1,130.00 LOCAL GOVERNMENT LIEN SEARCH $15.00 We are prepared to issue a title insurance policy by Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation,in the form and amounts listed above. This report is preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and shall become null and void unless a policy is issued,and the full premium therefore paid. The land hereinafter described is situated in the County of Lane,State of Oregon,and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT"A" VESTED IN: MERRILL LYNCH BANK&TRUST CO.,FSB,Successor Trustee of THE ELAINE H.ARMES TRUST dated November 27,2001 Dated as of June 7,2007 at 5:00 p.m. • PRE-SUBMIUAI REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • • Order No.50-0174107 Page No.2 Subject to the exceptions,exclusions and stipulations,which are part of said policy,and to the exceptions as shown herein: I. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public record;proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights,interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,or claims of easement,not shown by the public records,reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof,water rights,claims or title to water. 4. Any encroachment(of existing improvements located on the subject land onto adjoining land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the subject land),encumbrance,violation, variation,or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the subject land. 5. Any lien,or right to lien,for services,labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the herein described property lying within the limits of roads and highways. 7. Any adverse claim based on the assertion that: (a) Said land or any part thereof is now or at any time has been below the ordinary high water mark of Slough. (b) Some portion of said land has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portion so created. (c) Some portion of said land has been brought within or removed from the boundaries thereof by a change iu the location of Slough. 8. This property is within the Willamette River Greenway and is subject to all laws and regulations pertaining thereto,including,but not limited to ORS 390.310 through 390.368 inclusive. 9. An easement created by instrument,including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded: March 13,1942 Document No.: 108268,Deed Records To: State of Oregon by and through its State Highway Commission 10. An easement created by instrument,including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded: August 3, 1944 Document No.: 138759,Deed Records In favor of: Glenwood Water District,a municipal corporation PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 Order No.50-0174107 Page No.3 1 I. Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan Notice,including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded: December 14,2004 Document No.: 2004-095229,Official Records 12. Any claims against the Estate of Elaine H.Armes,deceased,in favor of the State of Oregon, Department of Human Resources,Senior and Disabled Services Division. • 13. A certification of trust under which the trustee(s)hold title,to the herein described property should be furnished for our review. (The Elaine H.Armes Trust dated November 27,2001) NOTE: Taxes paid in full for the year 2006-2007 Original Amount $2,264.09 Tax Lot No.: 17 03 34 33 00700 Account No.: 0299436,Code 04-28 Taxes paid in full for the year 2006-2007 Original Amount: $88.37 Tax Lot No.: 17 03 34 33 00700-901 Account No.: 1507381,Code 04-28 (Improvement Only) (Billboard) NOTE: We find no judgment liens or tax liens against Al Patel. NOTE: The property address as shown on the Assessors Printout is: 3005&3007 FRANKLIN BLVD EUGENE,OR 97403 Any questions concerning the closing of this transaction should be directed to Lisa Lemonds,your Escrow Officer at(541)485-3588. Any questions concerning Preliminary Title Report should be directed to Jerrilyn Egger at(541)431-3710. cc: REMAX PROPERTY SPECIALISTS 88344 TERRITORIAL H W Y VENETA,OR 97487 Attn: ELIZABETH SIGEL Ph:(541)485-4700 Fx:(541)935-1859 cc: REMAX INTEGRITY 4710 VILLAGE PLAZA LOOP SUITE 200 EUGENE,OR 97401 Attn: HEATHER ROMITO Ph:(541)345-8100 Fx:(541)302-4899 NOTE: For copies of exceptions,please contact our Customer Service Department at (541)284—8011 or email your request to eueene(),westerntitle.com PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 41 40 Order No.50-0174107 Page No.4 EXHIBIT"A" Beginning at a point in the North line of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No.68,Notification No.3284 in Township 17 South,Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,14.45 chains South 73°30' West from the Northeast corner thereof and running thence South 5.44 chains to the center of the slough running Easterly and Westerly through said claim,thence up the center of said slough North 87°East 1.77 chains,thence North parallel with the East line of said claim 5.88 chains,to the North line of said claim and thence South 73°30'West 1.85 chains to the place of beginning,being a part of said Donation Land Claim in Lane County,State of Oregon. ALSO: Beginning at a point on South line of Pacific Highway right of way South 0°03'East 57.8 feet from a point which is on North line of Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim and which point is South 74° 12' West 831.6 feet from the Northeast corner of the Zara Sweet Donation Land Claim No.68,in Township 17 South,Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,thence along South line of Pacific Highway right of way North 74°01'30"East 57.0 feet,thence South 1°0'East 360.0 feet to center of slough,thence South 88° West 55.3 feet,thence North 0°03'West 388.1 feet,more or less,to point of beginning,all in Lane County,Oregon. PRE-SUBMITfA!RECD APR 2 2 2013 • Attachment '9' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD Springfield, Oregon . Prepared For: Alpesh Patel 1857 Franklin Boulevard Springfield, Oregon 97403 Prepared By: TRT Engineering LLC 2636 SE Market Portland, OR 97214 (503) 235-7592 (F( April 16,2013 PRE-SUBMI1TAl REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER 1 SECTION A-PROJECT OVERVIEW 2 SECTION B-METHODOLOGY AND ANAYLSIS 2 SECTION C-ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS 3 SECTION D-STORMWATER FACILITY 3 SECTION E-OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 3 LIST OF APPENDICES _.__. .. .. APPENDIX 1 -FIGURES APPENDIX 2-STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS II, PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 222013 e CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER 3005 Franklin Boulevard Candlewood Suites Motel Stormwater Management Report I hereby certify that this Stormwater Management Report has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets the minimum standards of the City of Springfield and normal standards of engineering practice. I hereby acknowledge and agree that the jurisdiction does not and will not - ' • assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability, or performance of the drainage facilities'desigi ed by me. ��Ep PR aces s 5 NGINEF /0 W �14,4949 9! This document was: ce 6 t' 1 GL;�tt�� / c OREGON ?' �y26, SVQ� 4/0413 Y R. Prepared by: oYP 6 13u1/g Timothy R. Turner,PE PRE-SUBMflAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Stormwater Management Report Candlewood Suites t April,2013 Page 1 I • • SECTION A—PROJECT OVERVIEW Existing Conditions The project is located on the south side of Franklin Boulevard east of the Interstate 5 overpass in Springfield, Oregon within the SW 1/4 of Section 34 and SE 1/4 of Section 33,T.17S.,R.3W., WM.(see Figure 1 —Appendix 1).The subject facility consists of Tax Lots 100 and 700. The stormwater drainage treatment facilities are to be constructed on Tax Lot 700. Tax Lot 100 is currently approximately 70%deveioped with a`gravb'i parking lot and mobile offices associated with a temporary construction operation.The remainder of the parcel is covered with vegetation mostly along the south and west boundary. Tax Lot 700 includes an unoccupied single-family residence and two out-buildings. The buildings are surrounded by lawn and landscaped vegetation. The ground slopes to the south with a gradient less than 5%.There are delineated wetlands along the south parcel boundary. A portion of the subject property is within the 100-year floodplain. Site Soils i A February 27,2013 Geotechnical Site Investigation by K&A Engineering, Inc. indicates the subsurface condition on Tax Lot 700 consist of 2 to 4-feet of dark brown organic silt and/or clay over 4 to 7-feet of fine alluvium. Groundwater surface was observed at 5.2 to 7.8-feet below ground surface. Proposed Development The proposed development is to construct a motel building and associated sidewalks, driveways and parking lots.A public sanitary sewer will be extended to serve the motel. A combination biotreatment and infiltration swale will be constructed to handle the post-development stormwater runoff.The swale will be located near the south boundary of Tax Lot 700 adjacent to the wetlands.The swale will have a high flow discharge spillway which will drain to the wetlands(see Figures 2 and 3,Appendix 1). The swale was designed consistent with the city of Portland Stormwater Manual. SECTION B—METHODOLOGY AND ANAYLSIS The swale sizing is done with the HydroCad version 9.10 hydraulic modeling program(see Appendix 2). No on-site soil infiltration testing was done during the investigation. The test boring nearest the swale location(B-4)showed silt and fine-grained sand to a depth of 4 feet and sandy silt below (' that. Based on this boring an assumed infiltration rate of 2.0 inches per hour was used for the swale design. Stormwater Management Report PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD Candlewood gee April 2013 APR 2 2 2013 • Table 1 shows a summary of the modeling. Table 1 Storm Rainfall Peak Incoming Peak Swale Bypass Bypass Event Amount,in Flow, cfs Elevation, ft Elevation,ft Flow, cfs Treatment 0.83 0.16 432.78 434.00 0.00 2-year 3.30 0.77 434.07 434.00 0.20 10-year 4.30 1.01 434.16 434.00 0.78 Contributing Drainage Area The contributing drainage area for the Swale is approximately 43,995 square feet(see Figure 2). Downstream Discharge The swale is designed to infiltration the entire runoff from up the treatment storm event. For greater storm events a portion of the treated runoff will flow over the bypass weir to the wetlands. SECTION C—ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS The post-development runoff will be treated prior to infiltration to the underlying soils. Releases { to the wetland will be only for storm events greater than the treatment rainfall event. SECTION D—STORMWATER FACILITY The proposed swale location and associated drainage basins are shown on Figure 2. SECTION E—OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The operations and maintenance of the swale is the responsibility of the motel owner,Alpesh Patel. Storm water Management Report Candlewood g211E-SUBMITTAL REC' Page 3 April 2013 APR 2 2 2013 I APPENDIX 1 -FIGURES • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Ne^;1n 5 '14. 4n�'Li,MAFi i ,� c �14 f3�gkb yF.'�Cyr�Y' 4�i ) l{ t�•f!a a, 4w dj to l�aama]e' �''�, ....0,1fiuio,G�n °# �e ° S1utriwp gr`ep tM e fin' ,:, . r ,,a t a fn Aft . i p 44FIII,7i,4 d4 a'/p �, i�; E 4 u ci &rMa �'t r " k an is#O +bx t 69 � " d ° s 4 #r �}b'�A�a�� rIP,l ) f -i Yir ati .g ipERfa }bi Sn 4� pth \x 4 p i Fv 1 S}}��' �� x b'� }� � rykFF.tl .t � �;idr Px�° o°a a x 'a" i f'r' "S, aet^_, -"4i s�1y 15-4.94,-;-.; lh -g e,.t fF+, i9 itr::4 1 t? N .. ,4N: �r .r -. pj � t sfVy'&.,. 6a an f 2 I•f r 'W'k . � ! t F�h�, q�f9 to S� M 1 PAS 't 4 > _..- . � f Yin V 1 n a 4k1 i jSi' d R a_}j I: l ttav .�s.. vot IM Se .. .., r3 [ i 5-0 Eta .e,1 bs ft W ,5,, h c „yis :4 4 a • '1.80. a r ?1i4�'t„�,`e n" f ° n 0 tel r t,re " i �-f r + E'7i'&l f a x%R3 ,,c p n I x ti#,.wiF�`aYr,, n ti 7 t M`:. yR1 t}}1 rsrga;' 'a'uul1� dd, n o rJ 311,-'s ' r33f` . Y� '�FitS3 �W#�1n ! r 1Z6 i 1 : 7 -?Y.+ �. k tx �a.. 4 Vifny r,F p -' u t 4 z P X 5 "f 3sge - ,,:i&i} f a " #'f r ` t o 3 t u a S, h" w '' r ,r v + n ., x',f qm TF.Y it y?issii .- NSF r rr.. ei t' '� ✓'FCdrnY i`` .., unt-� .,," ' '.i , , Y } 4.. .f' x th r 2„- 3 .a-r1 y .v N t ��a' f 1,, `"+ S 2�e}11> e x�aY.4-/ '-, ns > A., # ar ; iS' >+ i;" pti w,-, a^F _ -:F ' '.#11 �^<ti avt ?1,-12 *. +�*`4,,,, 'i°�µ�1t"'"s ��'A,h n ix i a4.1•, i. ?�yo y 2 1 1'. [f -ni f' P'f 4 ley �' , --, y�^ynf-.:.N .� N .R F' T" ,t F t 4 /' +yi„t i„.`• x'3rnn m'd {�tA.i Ef&. Ja "^n iS FoW`" �t t1 )i 'a a 1 i s,tts..� >, l in 1'Y L' ,, ^ t f xt 3,'va .yir Gi r '4'f "r. v `'i. • ti0: mr1tH/'4 t1� a,}��i' �, �t T4 ae S si a x r yt+. ti' -4�.,i g3 ^k- x�'V�sxr 51' SSn, -.ke s r., ,n**ca"-sY a'' r za,fF.:e.a. ' ,'4fi-iz a .1� x n .fi J. .": 4 n` :; x s' n xt` ait `Jt- 'tl 4'•t f+w�z r- n+.tf�,,:. q k. �:.,e ,. x, 7`t i�r('" > K 1 S'. b#lY gPh °� eX s '.N�tt Jni4 Y t a a •4fi W- `-'togs' iS y trkoc t4,i'i ,�slTEs' .Y`' "T U.Sat i4,ir,d.t4+v^ .E- n.. i 0,y ".itt „1 zt rdYnt },e t -fir ( i 11..i 6.4 .yp 'qc, ) ,xt ato f S +,1 �t ,, ,, °,. a,1 .! '4 a ) )o4 . ' k2t if: f^�s Y<,S .pftlaikt"i y t p"a,Cge aR •P 4.tr 42 £s+.F'`fl feR trItAVua t� �J- ylif ts.a vx F r ftt -t. i°f""'KaNetiy,� r`cx�'1'' rK. t �^ Ji 51' 71 i l a f',�`tt intt,s fdttA K,T�Sa.� te4 • n u < ". b x N .T.i.t 't yj.b y3 t a.,, s01 1`Y '1 ! 4-4 f s,-v u t i rtti nS xY e rn -tN'ei x n,x a .e-r a S "'s d .es ue7 War'7 4 "`"x`54 ba 4 "z': �m `goa}t'E >,.,l 1 ,Y-r .,. .*:4 y � .w x �.1•yY.:r' '+/Te'R.�t! r Y ? nita+4' � 'Rh:nSu?rvuar anr.r., vc'�.a 4 +tFr. 14 d. Y zi 4.r.Y`G4 n j"' -,..L ,4 r`i i. '.v". , +'- �.x4v,4 yx -'!, Fax s`f j5,c�a 4, �o' e i� yc Yay. a y r a C4'++ e - i . ° vs N a v P MMn Pv ,A y-a.v 1.„, q'. fE r 4, x[ a �S sst. a �}S Fn a cte., l�S ,r?1:04 4 a3N e s"V u`i a'�� .3r^ n1' ('a ct6eit 0?).`e r"k'�rt` 4.i,i1 �! t nd.+r�rvi}f� 'S t s f "ie nv n'��N o- sr � !9a .L �.,� Y r 5.P +4c,%- ¢.,idKyay > Y 4 \ ,x{a : r e Ns $ fc"-•iris a ri 4 a : �g 1P rs�; e i 3x.4. �r y 1 xse s y � '4 -'kt'is i,.ev. F n°- SuyP ITrS��'a !� �v$n by>� t ^ ti `;'c'Ttii 4n p rt _ q + .FNi rcT i .�� .�2°"y 1. .i f” xnAn'." . �>R t1 tz i 7:4 t. 4 # i '1#^ a�;, a vY,}� 3 iE,"">p�"a ) p21 c , 4 s 14i> vUtt!> 'r' +` s�'Y fY ..ms a r':a2".ss'."': '5-i r I) i F d3 i° me,� Y ems, ., s rf ,: ! o t t `� Ni. i° tit: _ [n`aN i:-NRt. ] } 1 ..x.■9 2 .rr a ". T-". - '4' b �Y n..tr u4 Y:�:�• I n t . a 4 ? .4 s-. •..a'at°ae e;. .. ^. ?� .r:t.-.e r VICINITY MAP • CANDLEWOOD LIL 3005 FRANKN SUITES BOULEVAMOTERD STORMWATER DRAINAGE P FIGURE t ?0REE S119ORT M R"! R C'D SPRING FIGURE 1 4/1/13 • APR 2 2 2013 1 • • 0 �; BOVle4O -- "c --14oi 7 `'I Fr i •'' .✓,, .'\ • I 1 i 1 ' OT 1BUILDING 1I `_-._. _ A I 1 1 ` 1 I i; l 1 I ! I j i II;1 ' •/ �: . ;. BASIN• . II ' — / rte. ♦ - I - Q9 (/ •♦♦N I' �_— j TL 700 11 ! I ‘ , 1 4,,"_....__.III . 4 ..J:-.__II ,.. , < .� 3 � U c l l I� ♦♦ ` _ ___• • 4 . .33. v SWALE l /\\rT _ Lt...� / 433 1`4 43T \•,L - '•._431 ..&"; .. HIGH-FLOW BYPASS .. • • DRAINAGE BASIN_ . — - — ' j WETLANDS I • • __t_ _ 0 / 40 " SCALg.Ito FEET,:::::::: :1) I I .• -- — — -- _ CANDLEWOOD SUITES MOTEL 3005 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STORMWATER DRAINAGE REPORT FIGURE J I nv W "URM rAi r J SPRING DRAINAGE 4/16/13 APR 2 2 2013 I • • F J°CC w ary F a 4 �Ea s < w°La 0 II- 1--co M 7 w IliMili , _ IoZ°3 a.' �?C: d F o N I. I , , ii, :... ..) O OMO wP V 41 to•_! _ w. • �� s.l;Q m N Z O m �. m o Y " -_ p CC to N m = n to Z� I:Y N p %/ a a m o •F � w U Z S O g 15 f N 't g 1 . l yrg �ittiPo ♦vim h n 1 N .n 7 I 9� d - ! / n f I iV / a N aff 3 _P NN / / 7 € - g nAri ' mm inn $$Im i /y/ 7 a - 8'do . u� o zzz rn ro �� w zz gg�yy jo zd zd zd.I - • '^ 000 r aNTi T7 U `� V a mmm mmm d' �''011M3 IFS. 3i�� PM=RR ggg • . F m6¢ w0W �� p0 a ming W g Y g 5 _ g „'_.\ l d mxz _ a <a Ao� �6 303 . ?. ELLS s W 9�m ay5 a.fy� .-- _ _ W 0a4 ao >:ao ¢Ct 8mb 1. o to ., ,_ F TN i . WZZ W W 3 £J- �yj0. y� z • Z a0N i ; .� YON ,ng E-SUfit E ��xz [NV.t Tao,a Lisa i APR 2 2 2013 • • APPENDIX 2 - STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • w"� yi:, k �LCy; a I 1r 442 P Roof and parking lot Swale (\Subcat Reach -on. Lin Drainage Diagram for Franklin \� -, Prepared by TRT Engineering, Printed 4416/2013 HydroCAO®9.10 sin 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.028 85 landscape (1S) 0.874 98 roof and pavement (1S) 0.080 98 swale (15) .:. .... . 0:382 -TOTAL AREA PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 1 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.63" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.16 cfs 0.051 of Pond 2P: Swale Peak Elev=432.78' Storage=282 cf Inflow=0.16 cfs 0.051 af Discarded=0.05 cfs 0.051-af Primary=0.00 cfs-0.000 of Outflow=0.05•cfs 0.051 af_ . ( Total Runoff Area=0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.051 of Average Runoff Depth=0.63" 2.90%Pervious= 0.028 ac 97.10%Impervious=0.953 ac • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 0.16 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth> 0.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Area (sf) CN Description 38,065 98 roof and pavement - ' " 1,240 85 landscape 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area = 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.63" for Treatment event Inflow = 0.16 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Atten=67%, .Lag=62.7 min Discarded = 0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 his, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, lime Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev=432.78' @ 8.94 hrs Surf.Area= 1,160 sf Storage= 282 cf Plug-Flow detention time 33.2 min calculated for 0.051 of(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 31.2 min ( 753.1 - 721.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area - Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 i. 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0'breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 { PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr Treatment Rainfall=0.83" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 8.94 hrs HW=432:78' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.05 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=432.50' (Free Discharge) t-2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) I; PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 sin 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.06" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff o.77 cfs 0.251 af Pond 2P: Swale Peak EIev=434.07' Storage=2,775 cf Inflow=0.77 cfs 0.251 af Discarded=0.13 cfs 0.191 af Primary=0:20 cfs 0.023 af Outflow=0.33 cfs 0.214,af Total Runoff Area=0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.251 of Average Runoff Depth =3.06" 2.90% Pervious=0.028 at 97.10%Impervious=0.953 at • • PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 0.77 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af, Depth> 3.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" - Area (sf)• -CN Description- 38,065 98 roof and pavement 1,240 85 landscape 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area = 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.06" for 2-year event Inflow = 0.77 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af Outflow = 0.33 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Atten= 57%, Lag= 30.3 min Discarded = 0.13 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.191 af Primary = 0.20 cfs @ 8.36 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, lime Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 434.07' @ 8.36 hrs Surf.Area= 2,765 sf. Storage= 2,775 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 234.1 min calculated for 0.214 af(85%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 132.9 min ( 795.6- 662.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 In/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0'breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 2-year Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 8.36 hrs HW=434.07' (Free Discharge) t--1=Exfltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.13 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.20 cfs @ 8.36 hrs HW=434.07' (Free Discharge) t-2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.20 cfs @ 0.60 fps) PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.03 hrs, 801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff Area=42,771 sf 97.10% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.06" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.01 cfs 0.332 af Pond 2P: Swale Peak Elev=434.16' Storage=3,054 cf Inflow=1.01 cfs 0.332 af Discarded=0:14_cfs 0.206 of Primary=0.78 cfs.0.077 of_ OuMow=0.91 cfs 0.282 of Total Runoff Area=0.982 ac Runoff Volume=0.332 af Average Runoff Depth =4.06" 2.90%Pervious=0.028 ac 97.10%Impervious=0.953 ac • ` I PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Roof and parking lot Runoff = 1.01 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.332 af, Depth> 4.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Area (sf) CN Description • * ' 38,065 '98' roof and pavement - - j * 1,240 85 landscape * 3,466 98 swale 42,771 98 Weighted Average 1,240 2.90% Pervious Area 41,531 97.10% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: Swale Inflow Area= 0.982 ac, 97.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 4.06" for 10-year event Inflow = 1.01 cfs @ 7.86 hrs, Volume= 0.332 af Outflow = 0.91 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.282 af, Atten= 10%, Lag= 10.6 min Discarded = 0.14 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.206 af Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af Routing by Stor-Ind method,Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 434.16' @ 8.03 hrs Surf.Area= 2,923 sf Storage=3,054 cf Plug-Flow detention time 198.5 min calculated for 0.282 af(85% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 94.3 min ( 750.5-656.3) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 432.50' 4,127 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 432.50 829 0 0 433.00 1,413 561 561 434.00 2,658 2,036 2,596 434.50 3,466 1,531 4,127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 432.50' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 434.00' 5.0' long x 5.0'breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Franklin Type IA 24-hr 10-year Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by TRT Engineering Printed 4/16/2013 HydroCAD®9.10 s/n 01507 B 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 8 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 8.03 hrs HW=434.16' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.14 cfs) rimary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 8.03 hrs HW=434.16' (Free Discharge) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.78 cfs @ 0.95 fps) PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • Attachment '8' ennnaur,ru.o ._.. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/Engineering Division Phone: (541)726-3753 Fax:(541)736-1021 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK --(Area below ibis line fhled out by Applicant)—•- (Please return to Matt Slender®City ofSpringfield Public Works Engineering;Fax it 736-1021,Phone H 736-1035.) Project Name: Candlewood Suites Applicant: App.Rep:Richard M Barre Assessor0 Parcel 17033433-00700 and 97033344-00100 Date: AprO 16,2013 -'-- L:ind'IJSe(s): Proposed 85 Unit Hotel' - Phone if 541-888-4540 Project SizO (Ocres): 98,334 sf(Approx.2.28 acres) Fax#: 541-686-4577 ApproO.IrnpervioOs 31,338x1 Email: rick©schtrmersatre.com F,16 11:@!jia.4llt�K?I#i15;IT�I;ryIn. 11�.ih� 'y�z::p;1 Il:i f•: ni R::1 AM1..b�li.i'-P Lv irx q,i r;U;l??.1!:s0A1a!:I!'i1 ,I.i I:CIV°it,:nr''1 ..,r;=•4rcy;.".4.ta'IFiI!I§rN4':141eIin JGliipllnJ;l'd Project Description(Include a copy of Assessor's map): Development of a 5-story,85-unit Candlewood Suites Hotel on Franklin Blvd In Glenwood. Includes primary access off of Franklin Blvd,parking for 86 vehicles,drive aisles and loading area;as well as landscaping and a vegetated stormwater swaie of approximately 3,200 sc. • Drainage Proposal(Public connection(s),discharge location(s),etc. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: • On-site stormwater runoff will collect Into catch basins which drain into the proposed vegetated swab°. Runoff will be vegetatively pre-treated and allowed to either percolate or evaporate. Storm event flows will flow from the swabs Into the adjacent existing riparianlwe0and along the southern border of the site(Reach#4 of the Glenwood Slough). See attached Grading and Utility Plan and excerpt from Springfield Stormwater Master Plan. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Construction phase:Erosion control measures. Development: 100%runoff will be vegetatively treated. —.Area below this line filled out by the City and Returned to the Anpilcanr)— (At a minimum,all boxes checked by the City on the front and back ofthfs sheet shall be submitted for an application to be complete for submittal although other requirements may be necessary.) i Drainage Study Type(EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note,UH may be substituted for Rational Methods ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid-Level Development Study—(use Unit Hydrogmph Method for calculations) Eij Full Drainage Development Study—(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: . ® Wellhead Zone: u/k ® Hillside Development rq/,^ ® Wetland/RD1parial: /pn,,j tw,ertam)/ —ys Floodway/Floodalain: N/A ® Soil Tyne: zH 6 — c 14—E-14,I i t 's,11y clay „ Othen Jq .Rn Kt; DttT Downstream Analysis: D'w —4,44' _Al N/A caN I'. ❑ Flow'Iline for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design}GL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Matt Stonder(a3 City of Springfield,email:mstouder(a}et.springfleld.or.us,FAX:(541)736-1021 tp of it PRE-SUSMITTAL.REC'D APR 222013 • • COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS • I For Official Use Only: Mir *Based upon the information provided on thefront of this sheet,the following represents a minimum ofwhat is neededfor an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage;however,this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield DevelopmentCode(SDC)or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval;Additional site speck information may be required Note:Upon scoping sheet submittal,ensure completed fornt has been signed in the space provided be low: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality(EDSPM Chapter 3) Re 'd N/A I. ❑ All non-building rooftop(NBR)impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated(e.g.multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media)for stormwater quality. Additionally,a minimum of 50%of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ;..1 ❑Where required,vegetative stonnwaterdesim shall be consistent.with interim design standards(EDSPM Section 3.02), - set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services(BES)or Clean Water Services(CWS). -.t ....r. $t wQOAgar a k. ® ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet,a simplified design approach may be followed as specified bythe BES for vegetative treatment. ® ❑ If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed,submit calculations/specifications for sizing,velocity,flow,side slopes, bottom slop;and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required ht Section 3:03.1 of the EDSPM ❑ All building rooftop mounted equipment,or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building,shall ' be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements(EDSPM Section 4.03) ® ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. ❑ A complete drainage study,as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1,including a hydrological study map. ' '� D Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event. i. ❑ Thie time of concentration(To)shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) ❑ Z A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. Oa-site drainage shall be governed by the • Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code(UPS C). ❑ 7. Elevations of the RGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems(EDSPM Section 4.04) Ft ow lines,slopes,tint elevations,pipe type and sins clearly indicated on the plan set. Minimum pipe cover shell be 18 inches for reinforced p pe and 36 inches for ply n concrete and plastic pipe materials, . or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb • load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ G Manning's"n"values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three(3)feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Misc C ❑ Existing and proposed contours,located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains • r ❑ Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another ❑ ® Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs,with the exception of residential building roofs(BDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as requited by the DEQ. Refer �. to the.website: www.dea.state.or.us/wq/groundwn/uiohomo.horj for more information. ❑ IN Detention pond's shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rotes for the 2 through 25-year storm events 1 *This form shall be included as an attachment,Inside the front':over,of the stormwater study *IMPORTANT.ENGINEER PLEASE REAL)BELOW AND SIGN! As the engineer of record,I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan sot. rf �/ / Signature: • � n� Date: 113 . PRE-SUSMIITAL REC'D nor 11 APR 2 2 2013 1 • • Attachment '10' • -cc". . '' Department of State Lands regon 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 Salem,OR 97301-7279 rx;. John A.Kiul+alier,MD,Governor (503)986-5200 FAX(503)378-4841 wtvw.oregonstatelands.us October 27, 2011 State Land Board City of Springfield Attn: John Tamulonis; Community Development Manager )ol ,A.l:itrhaber,t ao 225 Fifth Street -. . . ... - • Springfield, Oregon '-97477 Govenwr .. /Alpesh Patel Kate Brown 1857 Franklin Boulevard Secretary of State Eugene, Oregon 97403 Ted Wheeler Re: Wetland Delineation Report for Glenwood, Lane County; T17S State Treasurer R3W Sec. 33DD, Tax Lots 100 &.200, Sec. 34CC Tax Lots 500 &700;WD#2011-0219, Springfield, Glenwood Area Local Wetlands Inventory wetland.GS-2 Dear Mr. Tamulonis and Mr. Patel: The Department of State Lands has reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. for the site referenced above. Based upon the information presented in the report and additional information submitted upon request, we concur with the wetland boundaries as mapped in Figure 6 of the report. Please replace all copies of the preliminary wetland map with this final Department-approved map. Within the study area, one wetland (totaling approximately 0.40 acres) and no waterways were identified. The wetland is subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. Under current regulations, a state permit is required for cumulative fill or annual excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in the wetland (or below the ordinary high water line(OHWL)of a waterway). This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law only. Federal or local permit requirements may apply as well. The Army Corps of Engineers will review the report and make a determination of jurisdiction for purposes of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit application is submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to both copies of any subsequent joint permit application to speed application review. 1 Please be advised that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Department staff on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • This concurrence is based on information provided to the agency. The jurisdictional determination Is valid for five years from the date of this letter, unless new information necessitates a revision. Circumstances under which the Department may change a determination are found in OAR 141-090-0045 (available on our web site or upon request). In addition, laws enacted by the legislature and/or rules adopted by the. Department may result in a change in jurisdiction; individuals and applicants are subject to the regulations that are in effect at the time of the removal-fill activity, or complete permit application. The applicant, landowner, or agent may submit a request for reconsideration of this determination in writing within sk months of the date of this letter. Thank you for having the site evaluated. Please phone me at 503-986-5297 if you have • any questions. - Sincerely, jekVA7:::)/ Approved by W"""' Jevra Brown Anna Buckleeyvalt Wetland Specialist Acting Wetlands Program Manager Enclosures ec: Craig Turner, Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. ' City of Springfield Planning Department(Maps enclosed for updating LWI) Brian Wilson, Corps of Engineers, Eugene office Gloria Kiryuta, DSL i PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 0 r afi ..1 i 57 3' �- . • Sr -1 `• vt Y a t .? e f ills 1j J s9 — 0�� C. n \ : ` t'.F. a I ° I , :t t••„ hb0dal I 1 •,712111 4.2( 11Ii, - \ ...tt'st4 : ..r.:t .. 8:..iv• .- • . :4!• L..• — - K 't• Y.. V; • t '•hr .? �•.• Uf • BV • ': lilt mgo r Ra&o.Wa . 1.59 ., • [•. •. t. or'-: 1 • 111_S S soil r+ Study Area IN r .f .' :'' � : • . . r w• .yam.r a t ,: ••:•�4 • 1 :: 1 • / ' - -i . ate -- _• Race �. • I I: ' �• - �- 14362 .,- -� Island ..m . _4 ,•,. ..� 1 \\ �. lyL :Palt'ii. ..., I clot . 41•:...-.,..:„.p.., r tI _'I .. 61 rs+rl�l'_� ` :..• % % 'ii'a� dam. ^ { enW N $L.• u € .« �1k r� r'.\ 4 —I— i s• 44"?' ;: �a :` tI A. -.,),7„. , ) 1'aN Trot•� n 1 ti f a ' 1 1 t 4 I.;.g. .-,.. m_44•9_,:, 1 • • .0,, .7 <F I+ v 1 11 ' AttC ' 3 r a: ;:r-NI, • 'a-'t�t t 4t. :. r _�• S .ti+2` `a`7ir�••. ) - *s f °Felt = la,: .. • '111 :. Pad ' •'_ 44 . 1,F'' !: A re i :j:44 I y_• ,• .r' 1 •f ' r'•4, : '�} t1 t _ {.. l 1, .F ! C•• `\\I � � 1 r t\1y1 fit + ! •'• t�� . :r it .f to .\:[_ \ !tl• t . . • ' :- �\ - , 6,-, . rill . 7 I r % �r Lt. %'' i • .., •8/�.:•t'). _ �— .. ti- i.. Yn'k aurral d r . ..!.....e. r 7 _ ... r ` 71; ' -.t C; •;\ ;1 . . ,•-•..:f.: • t 1 1 C _ pa 601 17..-4-) ., . •.% ,. . •F , •. I :d G •r•,. . ._ 5 ' ' '• 5/9/11 4725 I Location and general topography for the City of Springfield site in Lane County, FIGURE Oregon(USGS Springfield,OR quadrangle,courtesy of www.digital•t •- 1 maps.com). DSt_ t�w Zot%— oZlel .-SUBMITTA. RE', D —.Pailtle Habitat Services.Inc. A DD n 2 'n13 • • • • Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site in Glenwood, Lane County, Oregon (Township 17 South; Range 3 East, Sections 33 and 34) Prepared for City of Springfield Springfield, Oregon Prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503) 570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX June 15,2011 P I -S 1/4.f ie Xd ,! " `4�7, t� 4 k4 n J Ar .t e.wr, {1JtilY .f�, rtr 11 a-a 4 • J as , J 14 st- tr .tji 1 4 s tk PRE'SUBMITTE 'EC'D APR 2 2 2013 Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site in Glenwood, Lane Comity, Oregon (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Sections 33 and 34) Prepared for John Tamulonis Community Development Manager City of Springfield 225 Fifth Street Springfield,Oregon 97477 Prepared by Michele Eccleston Craig Turner Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 (503) 570-0800 (503)570-0855 FAX PHS Project Number: 4725 June 15,2011 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I _ IL. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1 A. Landscape Setting and Land Use B. Site Alterations C. Precipitation Data and Analysis 2 D. Methods 2 E. Description of all Wetlands and Other Non-Wetland Waters 3 F. Deviation from LWIorNWI 3 G. Mapping Method 3 H. Additional Information 3 I. Results and Conclusions - _- 3 J. Required Disclaimer . 4 III. REFERENCES 4 APPENDIX A: Figures Figure I: Vicinity Map(USGS) Figure 2: Tax Lot Map Figure 3: Local Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4: Soil Survey Map Figure 5:. Recent-Aerial Photograph. Figure 6: Wetland Delineation Map APPENDIX B: Wetland Delineation Data Sheets APPENDIX C: Site Photos APPENDIX D: Wetland Definitions, Methodology(client only) PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • I: INTRODUCTION Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PHS)delineated the limits of potentially jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the State/U.S. for the City of Springfield site in Glenwood, Lane County, Oregon (Township 17 South, Range 3 East, Section 33,tax lots 100,200, and Section 34„tax lots 500 and 700). This report presents the results of PHS's wetland delineation within the study area. Figures, • ” including a map depicting the location of wetlands within the study area; are located in - ._ Appendix A. Data sheets documenting on-site conditions are provided in Appendix B. Ground- level photos of the site are located in Appendix C, A discussion of the wetland delineation methodology (for the client) is provided in Appendix D. II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Landscape Setting and Land Use The site is comprised of four taxlots located south of Glenwood Boulevard and east of Interstate 5.Tax lots 100,200,and 500 are owned by the City of Springfield andtax lot 700.is privately owned. PHS identified potentially jurisdictional wetland along the western and southern portion of tax lot 200 and the southern portions of tax lots 100, 500, and 700.The . adjacent land use around thesite is commercial and industrial. Tax lot 200 is undeveloped with a palustrine forested/open water wetland and upland forest.The northern half of tax lot 100 is a construction job site and staging area for the Interstate 5 bridge work. It consists of gravel fill and portable job trailers.The southern half is undeveloped,with an upland forest dominated by red alder(Alnus rubra),red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), Himalayan blackberry(Rubes discolor),cow parsnip(Heracleunr maximum),Robert's geranium (Geranium roberliana),and prickly lettuce (Laciuca serriola).There is a small portion of wetland within and adjacent to the soutlftax lot boundary. Tax lot 700 consists of two houses in the northern portion of the lot,and the central and southern portions are undeveloped.The tax lot consists of mowed lawn and ornamental landscape plants with a forested wetland dominated by black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpus)along the southern portion. Tax lot 500 is an undeveloped lot. The north and central portions of the site consist of black cottonwood, plantago(Planfago latilblia),tall fescue (Fesluca arundinacea), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carom),Canada thistle(Cirsium arvense),and teasel (Dipsacus sylversiris).There is a T gentle slope along the western and southern portion of the site dominated by English ivy (Hedera helix)and Himalayan blackberry. A forested wetland is located at the bottom of the slope in the southwestern portion of the tax lot. B. Site Alterations PHS did-not observe any site alterations at the time of the site visit. PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI IS N 4725 APR 2 2 2013 ravine habitat Services,Inc. . .. Pagel C. Precipitation Data and Analysis There is no weather station where the site is located in Glenwood, Oregon: As such, weather information in the City of Eugene, located approximately 1 mile west of the site,was used for comparison and precipitation analysis. Recorded precipitation for the City of Eugene totaled 0.90 inches for the two weeks prior to PHS's May 10,2011,wetland delineation field work and data collection. On the day of the delineation,there was nu rainfall. Total observed precipitation for the water year(October 1,2010 through May 10,201 1)was 35.36 inches,which is approximately 79 percent of normal.. Table I compares the average monthly precipitation to the recorded monthly precipitation in the City of Eugene,as well as to the normal precipitation range, as identified in the NRCS WETS Table for the Eugene WSO Airport. As shown in Table 1, recorded precipitation for the month of February was below normal but within the normal range.The recorded precipitation for the months of March and April were above normal but within the normal range:Since the rainfall two months prior was within the normal range, it is PHS's best professional judgment(BPJ)that "normal circumstances"were present at the time of the wetland delineation.field work. Table 1: Comparison of Average and Observed Precipitation at the City of Eugene weather station and Eugene WSO Airport WETS Table for the Three Months Prior to the May 2011 Wetland Delineation • Average 30%Chance Wi11 Have Observed Percent of Month' . • t • Less Than More Than Precipitation , Normal'' .. Precipitation,r get ,...Averages'..' ..ti Avers February 6.35 4.24 7.60 _ 4:91 77% March 5.80 4.13 6.87 6.24 108% April 3.66 2.30 4.42- 3.78 103% Notes: I. Source:NRCS WETS Table for the Eugene WSO Airport (htlp://www.wee.nres.usda.govt spiel/support/climatchretlands/or/4 1039.txt) ._ 2. Source:National Weather Service for the City of Eugene(hup://aww.weather.itov/clinmte/index.nim?ufu=nor) D. Methods PHS delineated the limits of the wetlands on the site based on the presence of wetland hydrology, hydric soils,and hydrophytic vegetation, in accordance with the Routine On-site Determination, as described in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y-87-I ("The 1987 Manual")and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. PHS conducted the wetland delineation and data collection on May 10,2011.The delineation of Wetland A was based on the presence of hydric soil indicators within the top 10 inches of the surface,hydrophytic vegetation,and wetland hydrology indicators such as saturation,water stained leaves,and geomorphic position. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PHS 0'4725 APR 2 2 2013 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Page 2 • • • • E. Description of all Wetlands and Other Non-Wetland Waters PHS identified the limits of one wetland within the study area.A description of the wetland is provided below. Wetland A Wetland A is located at the bottom of a slope between residential and commercial properties. The wetland continues offsite, but the onsite portion is 17,453 square feet/0.40 acre.The Cowardin classification is Palustrine Forested (PFO),and the HGM classification is Slope.The sources of hydrology appear to be stormwater, precipitation and groundwater. The portion of Wetland A delineated on tax lot 200 is dominated by Pacific willow(Salts lasiandra)and red osier dogwood(Cornus stolonifera).There were also several inches of ponded water at the time of the delineation. The portion of Wetland A on tax lots 100, 500 and 700 is forested and consists Of black cottonwood,Oregon ash(Fraxinus latifolia), and slough sedge (Carex obnupta)(as characterized by Sample Points 3,4,and 5). The adjacent upland vegetation (as characterized by Sample Points 1,2, and 6) includes red alder, Himalayan blackberry, English ivy,poison hemlock(Coniunf.maculatum), prickly lettuce; selfheal (Prunella vulgaris),and creeping bentgrass(Agrostis stolonifera), PHS based the delineation on the presence of saturation within 12 inches of the soil surface, hydric soil and hydrophytic vegetation,which coincided with low spots in the topography. F. Deviation from LWI or NWI PHS reviewed the 2010 Local Wetland Inventory(LWI) map for the Glenwood Area of Springfield.The LWI map identifies the wetland delineated on the site as GS-2.The wetland mapped on the LWI is slightly larger than what PHS delineated in the field. This is likely because the delineated wetland boundaries were surveyed with sub-centimeter accuracy as compared to drawing the boundary on a larger scale map with an'accuracy of+/-25 feet. G. Mapping Method PHS flagged the boundaries of the wetlands with blue surveyor's tape. Data points were flagged with lime green surveyor's tape. The wetland flagging and sample points were survey-located by the City of Springfield.The estimated accuracy of the survey is sub-centimeter. - H. Additional Information None. I. Results and Conclusions PHS identified one potentially jurisdictional wetland within the study area.The total area of wetland is approximately 0A0 acre within the site The wetland has a Cowardin Class of Palustrine Forested(HO)and an HGM Classification of Slope.The wetland continues off site to the east,west and south of the study area. Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI IS#4725 PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD Pacific Habitat Services,Inc: APR 2 2 2013 Page 3 J. Required Disclaimer This report documents the investigation, best professional judgment and conclusions of the investigators. It is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge, It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination of wetlands and other waters and used at your own risk unless it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Oregon Department of State Lands in accordance with OAR 141-090-0005 through 141-090-0055. - III. REFERENCES • - Adamus, P.R. and D. Field. 2001 Guidebook for Hydrogeomor phic(HGM)-based Assessment of Oregon Wetland and Riparian Sites. Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Riverine Impounding and Slopes/Flats Subclasses. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem,OR. Hitchcock, CL and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest:An Illustrated manual. University of Washington Press. •Munsell Color,2000.Munsell Soil Color Charts. Gretag-Macbeth,New Windsor,New York. National Resource Conservation Service Eugene WSO Airport WETS table for Lane County. li t tp:/hvww.we c.n res:u sd a.go v/ft nre f/su nnor t/c I i mate/wet I a nd s/or/4 103 9.txt National Weather Service Climate Data. hiip://s ii'w.weather.gov/climate/indea.p/Wwf0=n/i!' NRCS Web Soil Survey, 2011.Online Mapping for Lane County,Oregon. Oregon Department of State Lands. September 2001.Removal-Fill Lan' (ORS 196.800-196.990) and Removal and Filling in Scenic Waterways (ORS 390.805-390.925). ORMAP.org tax maps.2011. http://wwu'.ormap.org/ Pacific Habitat Services, Inc.2010. City of Springfield,,Glenwood Area Local Wetlands Inventory map. Reed, Porter B.,Jr., 1988.National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:Northwest (Region 9). Prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL.NERC- 88/18.37. US Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Camps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical.Report Y-87-I. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008.Interim Regional Supplement to the.Corps of Engineer Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region,ed.J.S. Wakeley, R.W.Lichvar, and C.V.Noble: ERDC/EL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS: U.S'. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U.S. Geological'Survey,2011,Springfield, Oregon, topographicalquadrangle. Source: www.digital-topomaps.com. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Wetland Delineation for the City of Springfield Site/PI IS#4725 APR 2 2 2013 Pacific I labital Services,Inc. Page 4 • Appendix A Figures • t‘ ( ... . .......,........_ .. , . . -- g.g. N / ,�3 i. . H S Y f Y 4 ni . msµ , , ; F s *maim.. : $ , ' ` x i I ' - i PR A WA ti CD APR 2 2 2013 . i • i 413 11—Tr'1.71 ''.-- . ef ff 1 Y t' , ,. 2nf` .� 33. . 1 r of yRi_-Y� iLl`urlil) 1 1 43:3 M. r� rJ9 E f N1 L .�i31 giani‘..___ •-- _ . 0 • .;•,:"7.:1, ....\•?>• ..1 7.! •• . . . •,'•• '.7.1":' ..!" • i .t., :'1$: 111 I /714 I1/4., ' .k\tqtro, 44%,'• •I':::;•••■,'1.1:1.'1: ;or .!!!.:';I.•• :1::-....r.1 • .: :1'..; Kei ' ). --\-- -t�.;r Redo To is •'ti -•"1 .• ..F' •lra, ' , E .,r.64 , '- , . ",•r, (KAS ) Y . 1 Cam.'. • . .k..•• �_+� : •?4 Stud Arca •-!' • • 0' • ., '•$ • ,,...- -417:73 '<Ilk.. N .in • l +. \„7,--A7.. \ ' .' 1.711@x.-..,•p 4� 1.;.- • ..•�-.•1 I ii y� •tit _ em 3 �'-J�.r i r,ar� • 11: '`y i� 5@ ,, 6 , p •" tai• •,p \.•`% • .67 i -....•,. . nit .-; - 'll _ 6 1 '_ , , !• •141 •, :i. a rk ji t1. . 1 111 p .: •$' , _'.1'J •\F w..'p' i ' 1 •- • _I'J — oft-= 1r Fa r.IF.. 445 ,w' +;`•7.l y: •:• 't � I .^_ .M 448 y'If . t triplet •'-' ;. •7 • 1 Sri eld . I t Ply., --,* ....4.:f aft 7/4A--,f •' `.. :. .'' "I ,f , ,•. ,......• ,„.7..-g,i.--- ''k,. It :Ai ii)1 Ni, '• �g:-.'.'Uwn . J ;'%' ..j.;./7/ i ••• II.• •• X171' Park • 63�. d �. J�_• 1 �J ' �' :; 1 rbllatUl ' L..7-•1�'�• V, f.. I.. .- A. I i ••� 9� LJttJ� 11 r r, •Y '• , _•.1,,, •...5. .. . „ ., ,,..Y 1 C. . "fi .fit � • _ „_ \ ( , 1 '1 ` Ir ` t.r `� • ` ik1.•...)1( 1 / :1 \ti` r� y\.' ii k .5, s..� 1 •�� I?,•• Laurela,7yod •- . i _ �-.. isus_'k_ _.. 1:!^r4r ! , ■ �� t• 9; r � r..c.val Goll r'b+lcse .,7",;14, :f f' '~ i \ ' 1 .,iii iii//J•- �' !4 !, �.''•. \ . �..-:F:1., '1 5. S I 519/11 4725 Location and general topography for the City of Springfield site in Lane County, FIGURE Oregon(USGS Springfield, OR quadrangle,courtesy of www,digital-topo- maps.com). Mil ■Pacific Habitat Services.Inc. P[ SIAMPAL RIO D APR 2 2 2013 . • s�LO I 0 C aj u t GI ,n — — O 5 a In N 1 O -9 t tv Kren..nnt M CO � .. W \ co gYY o p 4 v F: \ 4 W Z �� ,J �.., 1.0 cf 2y�YY} 1^ M 1/4 1....1 ♦ Rt U 4t71 1 l \lit _"`. F " ' cn a e� m 4,.1 ( 1 $' to_.{ tGl.'Z.:1 Vie o s a I f-. WAVM33YLi ,`CF; = Nil //erg . 1\-1. I t $ C r 1` 1 / 3Atl^ VLSn9ntl^I C U C CD w a�, r u, ,aj 8:I d , m p / 7 ` �0� In lI d f 11 ( '3Atl M31 Atl3Altl 1 U I i �1 0 cc Tlicn .,c- '�1) L / b 7I O 1 I t_,: — I: O I_ 1: T J '..•'I. .1 OtfN Al CA0 Q U I .I 1'0' , al I-- 1.1.1 PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD ,_ 0 N LL APR222013 , . do • . . in CNI .717:111 r-- ...4- t3 a V .}.., • ...._______ (.1) c■ 1 .c 4 cc it 4- .7, . " . n. . . . .... .., . :4 .. o o oc n o e... F. t= r- ca. Ii cr) a a .4 a. -J 1-V.III III II ; ± II A !tp. 1 II I. • 71 0 1711 I 11 w Ci.11 ,I il (1) Lt li •I ilk•d111 I re . .IIVItilill •I I cn-:1 ;■ ir--- t: :I a. t• I .....- ..., , 1•••• 1 7\‘, - ---- 1 t, I . 0 cr) ri a ca I ,..-\--- —r•-;;-----..-=-7:----+ 13 I L k ;I I a I 0 'I•g- ct6i ......... __77N.ro 0-1.f -:14--,__ .., _I c 4- a •.."k a \1 { g .,i a 1 1 til. - , Ili ; (2 / i a) tn ‘.1. "V I t- , 1, ..t, ■ \,... - li 1 • " • vi / w 7,/ Ln cm in 7tI• , 1 t 7 i a F / I/ 41 *It': P. -•• C, 0 : • 0- CP; En 1:-.-,i•*, i\ Tr. ''',-;1: ',., -:,---•-• ' Ili . ; •I" t pi' t ..., , ,,...,..--,--. 45 q i:-. '-' 1 , .` , III.I.': • ; -f't 4, '0, I l'i II Y--,-*41/2. iL":,' 3 ... 1V,i1.•._! I-t.i 1 I ....\Ill —• if a/ i,(1 0 W 077 41 I•'' C.: ' - ) ; P / :a ° - al CD 7.cc to as am iit M t = -1 ° X a C13 ° PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D in . APR 2 2 2013 0 cNi as EL' Lc, _ , . • • . . • • Glenwood LWI Map (A-1 ) t"l.'larr•ltit it�for .--,.. Study Area 1 ----. - .;;;;°....... • . -. . r i t . . : , GS-1 t' " I. ?\\.,1 .,, 741- %11114 , - i : AGS-3 I -we. \ / ' . , ........ . • 49 S 1 _ -net Lam, r Suffice Maims,* . •-•.• 1 :ti lemn h.rrr.e•a.r•• .W.,rr.w.r.rr•r•w• 1•r AM no... ., 7 llii Corwrde CL•/Mkarrerl �'�-.� r I J*r, np$rear no rwa.r. «r.,-- Gainagea•elne """ A 1 I11101. 14/M/1 �r•.....r�e.M l Sheet 2.Glenwood Area of Spfingfiefd Local We1ands Invuulory I MlCll•200 fall ►+•r•+.r r:. ..L-A.v..r r r...•-1.-•-11.s...ti+.r+.r. ■ ror-srwa r4...,,. P. P. ar w.•+rta Y•News•r.•r•••1.WrMM.Me411∎111•Wr News. .... "'•••-s• .•.aw..Y 1.1.• M +wl w•.,�►d wNN•pq•rrrMN•MOOU •~- •••••w r— •..Mir'+t ;Voree•w'+sevrasu U Mpoloomepe Oeee•. rs.r. —„•, a rA �C4 ItIGO feat ..MY ear•nY•rfr•-•+r IM..N•w/we WWII*,rapeFIYr Y Pbl r+s -,:.:. -- J.. 4725 5/9/11 .~.,,l taorrlgr•w nr•pres,.....a Local Wetlands Inventory of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon FIGURE (City of Springfield,Glenwood Area LWI, 2010). P 3 RE-SUBMITTAL REC'D —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. APR 2 2 2013 . • • Lc, c...1 4.11,41 ,.... ..,:t. 0 ..... • x 1 •. h : 19 .. i .,, ---7i. - _ \ I . Llh. 1 . . % ' . -'.''--'1 / •I 0 :7.1 ' = it. l I "1�110j !' I! 4i O_ 4 Cam, g •- ' • i i`z_. - ,f - fir U y ta. CV f V +I r. e • f i QL] 0 ce qi .,-- , ' yamI f, .. . 0 4,FS _ ~'`... . U �`�' fir.• I �O t` j N C c co 1 '.. A f C u - . I - .�r _ • . r 2'1 ' - i,...51:A .. 111,..) \',--, 04r/ 1. 41"Tre. 44■deo." ' ' .-......... ...197. ...., .. tc . hi ---1-...'711CRF f. I. 7:::::.,,,,,,)ff-,,:.• AIIIIP5:" ..7.-----,:p____,4-C.e—1:1-.r71:•, ..k.liiii:i.iwi,_, ro.o. 2-t ....... ; ! :i.,.*;. F. I yam _ 0 ! } \ 0.,2 ..1,„ _. ___ _ , 1 ; ),(/:47-eilr--[ -- — — - -- . crs M • !. TJ = co .I f.. I.I.cart 0,4 :.t V;7;:,r •.'r ..C.:N VA •► ...<iarr. IXv+JS. Ao!',l ... !ir A Y PRE-SUBMflIAt RECD LLI APR 222013 r 0 • T i . , F :`• .. } as 1 Study Area pi - I • i tea• "-,14 , l _•it L •, 'T- *�rr�_'`. .■ 1 1 ';1 _... • r r � f 1 . , _,..,.... , ,..::r- s _ - , ,_ . .._.. ,. . „,,e___ . ,,,; - ...,, ,_ „. I i . , . ,'• - # P. ph 'a ... MI j •[ •.,irPy- ems,••!,....-..,,�, r.. - _ I4 - '1' • . 1 ti ...7.4.)s. :::-,,- pie!r !►� C 4 �, i 4, t •n.R� ` •. 4 n atie Nitto,Orcpon• rv.�, . o8I maartrl i --Jar':9 :'4b r d<r I• -, rr. .'S is l,r..i :P 5/9/11 4725 Recent Aerial Photograph for the City of Springfield site in Lane County,Oregon FIGURE (GoogleEarth,2005), 5 `ri ` -AI —Pacific Habitat Services.Inc. ! �JUBt4I'i!Y D��I� .'\PK 2 Z LOTS e •• • -----------♦ ` Y , \,, 1 �,_ r \ II) z it 1 i ;4 0`S 1 _ �fy l:;:!!/'z 1 r y1�� N I f ` � i :Pt( l Ii d JI . c ,�.r�� D R 1• BOON. •• •y 1 + V "S- i0 O I -a,Y y 1: �\ ,��. U al \\`1 `- r �. �.`% 95$ 95 �' O J 7 \\„ _ _ 2 ? �- 1t I , o 0.0_ �' \;\y\ o I 1 f V a a 1_•-igifielt: ( • •...11.ii. t�1' �. �\ 6 1` N o ..-. z � fit, n - .``' ' N \ 1� m o I V I O `5-, % tI t 1' -Do- ,. / '\1!Il,+i O3 '1 8n I y<jp 6 OsN 4l I 1 J u u e N _ W C �(It 1 a /,(may I Q' / ' I }, /�` � , t O O O G� ii: I �++ , V I�A.. I O .) C. a O �•o+ £ vh4 ,�, /, a U r,� q c _ J :(; / 1 in C o.VI ti om / ''c' i - -,:■\ /. \ \\ r. ••\...., \ ,/ ....!:.-.-- - ( ---.. i \ 1'illpl1l'I / \ A.1. \_ 1 • o I I$ y 1\‘ h � r I ) \. v`lNa tI \ };k\A1 \ w+fir - : ,Ii - .1 RE- "11 A itEn ApR2a i ■ . • • Appendix B Wetland Determination Data Sheets IF-I b a �. . me:: 4 r t � u r p-.r a G (-7M cif a t, c -1, c'. b pi` Fs ▪ rt.. 7Fr § . t . t!° Y,•• t . - tr°w, S,tRy r` p a v srz r. i. !b n. ▪ t R., , PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • • PHS A 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 5110/2011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point 1 Investigator(s): M EcclestonlC Tumor Section.Township.Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Sod Map Unit Name: Newberg•Urban Land Complex NW Classification: Are dimatklhydrologic conditions on tlm site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No Of no,explain in Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances"present? (Yin) Y Are vegetation — Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No to Sampled Area within Hydro Soil Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No X Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover. Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 ) Number of Dominant Spades 1 Alnus rubs. 20 X' FAC! That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 3 _ Total Number of Dominant 4 . Species Across All Strata. 2 (B) 20 a Total Cover aolinalShrub Shahan (plot size:_) Percent of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL.FACW, or FAC: 100%. (ANB) 2 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cow of Multlply by:. 5 OBL Species x1= 0 0 •Total Cow FACW spedei x 2 0 FAC Spades. x3 a 0 Herb Stmtum (plot size: 6 ) FACU Species x 4 a 0 1 Callum aperinn a FACU UPL Spades x 5= 0 2 Conlum maculatum 40 X MC Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (6) 3 Lactuca seniors 10 FACU 4 Solanum dulcamara 3 FAC Prevalence Index=WA= #DIVI01 6 Lamlum amploxiceule 2 UPL g Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 ' 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophilic Vegetation 8 X 2-Dominance Test is>50% ' 60 =Total Cow 3-Prevalence Index is 5 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting. • Woody Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) t 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plantar 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hytldc we and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground In Herb Stretuin 20 Vegetation Yea X No Present? Remarks: PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD ArR 2 2 2C13 • • • SOIL PHS A 4725 Sampling Point: 1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Types Loc' Texture. Remarks. 0-15 10YR 312. 100 Silt Loam. Rocks and bricks in soil profile 'Type:C=Concentration.D=Depietion.RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. °Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix: • Hydric Soil Indicatorsr(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sollsl:- Histosol(A1) _Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histie(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)lexcept MLRA 11 Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Greyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Reaox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) Depleted Dade Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Y hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(54). Redox Depressions(Fe) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None Depth(i„d,ei), Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Ridrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) . Surface Water(AI) Water stained Leaves(09)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(09) High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 40) (Except MLRAI,2,4A,and 48) Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(010) Water Marks(81) Aquatic invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water.Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Saturation Visthle on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(03) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Met or Crust(B4) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(85) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Sods(C6) Fac-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Sol Cracks(B6) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Other(Explain in Remarks). Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(Inches):' Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (itudas capfaary runge) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),a evadable: None_ Remarkf: PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • • III PHS# 4726 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 611012011 Applicant/Owner City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point: 2 Investigator(s): M EcclestonlC Tumor Section.Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hltsiope.terrace.etc:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%):. Subregion(LRR):• LRRA Let: 44.04392 Lang: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (it no,explain in Remarks) Me vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are-Normal Circumstances.'present? (Y/N) Y • Are vegetation _ Sod_ or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing Sampling point locations,transacts,Important features,etc. - Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Area within Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species?- Status Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL,FACW or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number at Dominant 4 Species Auoss Al Strata: 1 (B) o =Total Cover • Deanna/Shrub Stratum (plot size: ) Percent of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL,FACW or FAC: 100'/. (NB) 2 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by: 5 OBL Species z 1= 0 0 =Total Cover FACW species x2= 0 FAC Species x 3= 0 . Herb Stratum (plot size: 6 ) FACU Species x 4= 0 1 Pruneila vulgaris 20 FACU UPL Species x 5= 0 2 Hypochaeris militate 3 FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (8) 3 Agros#s stolonlfera 80 X FAC 4 Hyper/cum perforatum 2 UPL Prevalence Index=B/A= #DIV/01 6 Carexsp. 6 (FAC). 6 Solanum dulcamara 2 FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation g _ X 2-Dominance Teat Is>50% 112, =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index isS 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 a Total Cover 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or prohlematib Hydrophytic, %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Vegetation Yes X No Present? Remarks: PRE-SUBMITAL REC'D APR 222013 « II SOIL PHS n 4725 Sampling Point:. 2 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conthm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' LOG' Texture. Remarks 0-B IOYR 312 100 Silty Clay Loam 8-13 10YR 212 100 Silty Clay Loam 13-17 10YR 212 100 Sandy Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion;RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Hictosol(Al) Bandy Redox(55) 2cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(56) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Metic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1), Very Shaflow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4)- _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11)' Depleted Matrix(F3). Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Resox Dark Surface(FE) 'Indicators or hydrophytk vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Redox Depressions(F8). problematic. Restrictive Layer(I1 present): Type: _. . . None Depth(Inches): _. Hydric Soil Present? Yes. No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY _. . . . Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary.indicators"(minimum of one required:check all that apply) .. Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(M) Water stained Leaves(B9)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(B9) High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 4B) (Except MLRAl,2,4A,and 48) Saturation(A2) Salt Crust(611) Drainage Patterns(1310) Water Marks(B1) Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82)'- _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drat Deposes(83) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(84). .Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(135) _Recent Boa Reduction in Plowed Soria(C6) Fa Neutral Test(D5) Surface Sot Cracks(BE) Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(06)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches); Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches); Wetland Hydrology Present?' Saturation Present? Yea No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (mduaes,napltary fringe)'. Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: None Remarks: I PRE-SUBMITTAL RECD r • • • • • • PHS# 4725 . .. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 511012011 Appllcant/O.rner City of Springfield States OR Sampling Point: 3 Investigator(s): M EceleslonlC Turner Section.Township.Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hrstope,terrace,etc.:) Terrace- Local relief(concave.convex.none): Slope(%):. Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silly Clay Loam NW Classification: Aro ctimaticmydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (if no.explain In Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? (Y/N) Y Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes' X No Is Sampled Area within Hyddc Sot Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant, Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover. Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: ) Number of Dominant Species 1 That are OBL FACW.or FAC: 1 IN 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 .. Species Across MI Strata: 1 (B) 0 =Total Cover Sno110gl5hr�uilladmm. (plot size: ') Percent of Domhmnl Species 1 That ant OBL.FACW,,orFAC: 100% (NB) 2 3 - - Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by:- 5 _ _. OBL Species. x T= 0 0 =Total Cover FACW species x2= 0 FAC Species x3= 0 Herb Stratum (Plot sire: 5- ) FACU Species x4= 0 1 Corn obnupta 50 X OBL UPL Spades x 5= 0 2 Prunella vulgads 20 FACU Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 Fraxinus latllolia 10 FACW 4 Solanum du/corpora 2 FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= #DIVIOI' 5 Carex sp. 20 (FAC) 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation B X 2-,Dominance Test is>50% 102 a Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is 5 30' ' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Wait Vine Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or one separate sheet) 1 _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 • problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 0 a Total Cover 'Indicators of hydde sot and wetland hydrology must be present,unless. disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground In Herb Stratum i Vegetation Yes- X No • R . Remarks: Present? PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • A-2- 5 . • • SOIL dHS# 4725 Sampling Point: 3 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % .Color(moist) % Type the Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 312 80 10YR 414 10 C M Silt Loam _ 10YR 311 10 R M 4-18 10YR 412 85 7.5YR 414 15 C M Sandy Loam •'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Mabix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. °Location:PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic HyddcSolls3: Histosol(Al) -Sandy Redox(55) 2 cm Muck(A10) Hisfic Eplpedon(A2) _ Stripped Maki (56) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Iistic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(excepl MLRA 1) Very Shallovi Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) __Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Redox Dark Surface(F8) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) shdloatca of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S7) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present):: Type:. None Depth(inches): _ Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY. Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required). Surface Water(A1) X Water stained Leaves(89)(Except MLRA Water stained Leaves(B9). High Water Table(A2): 1,2,4A,end 4B) (Except MLRAt,2,4A,and 45) X' Saturation(A3) -Safi Crust(811) Drainage Patterns(810) Water Marks(81), _Aquatic Invertebrates(513) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) X' Geomorphic Position(02) Algal Mat or Crust(84) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(133) Iron Deposits(85) _Recent Iron Reduction In Plowed Soils(CS) X FaC-Neutral Test(05) Surface Sal Cracks(66) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(DO)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery(B7) Other(Eiplaln In Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) • Field Observations: Surface WaterPresent?• Yes NO X Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes. No X Depth(inches): >18. . Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present?• Yes. X'. NO Depth(inches): 8 Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well aerial photos,previous inspections),B available: None, • Remarks: PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • • • • PHS O 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and.Coast Region Project/site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 511012011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield Stale: OR Sampling Point: 4 Investigator(s): M Eccleston!C Turner Section.Township.Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(haslope,terrace.etc:) Slope Local relief(concave.convex,none): . Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DO Soil Map Unit Name:. Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NWt Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V 140 (d no,explain In Remarks) Are vegetation'_ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Noma!Circumstances'present? (YIN) V Are vegetation — Soap or Hydrology naturally problematic? II needed,explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts,important features,etc.. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is Sampled Area within Hydric Sea Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes : X No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 ) Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxlnus latifolla 30 X FACW That are ORL,FACW.or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata:: 1 (B) 30 =Total Cover eeollnalShmb Stratum (plot size: ) Percent of Dominant Species 1 That ere OBL.FACW. or FAC: 100% (NB) 2 . 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet 4. Total%Cover of Multiptyby: 5 OBL Species x 1=• 0 0 '=Total Cover FACW species x2= 0 FAC Species x3= 0 Herb Stratum (plot size: ) FACU Specles x 4= 0 1 UPL Species x 5= 0 2 Column Totals 0' (A) 0 (8) 3 4 Prevalence Index=WA= IDIVIOI 5 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydmphylic Vegetation 8 X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 0 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index la 5 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting yVoodv Vine Stratum (Wet size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 �— 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 - Problematic HydrophylroVegetation'(Explain) 0 =Total Cover- 'Indicators of hyddc sal and wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground in Hem Stratum 70. , Vegetation Yes: X ANo-r�z�'F��--r� _ Present? LiVll�i it hI. V Remarks: APR 222013 4111 4111 SOIL PHS o 4725 Sampling Point. 4 Pro ale Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) • Depth Matrix Redox Features . (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0-8 _ 10YR 211 60 10YR 314 60. C M Silt Loam 6.17 10YR 411 60 10YR 314 50 C M Silty Clay Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix.CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining, M'Mihix Hydric Soli Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(A1) _ __Sandy Redox(55) 2cm Muck(A10) Hiatt Epipedon(A2) _Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Materiel(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except Mims) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Greyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Sudan(Al2) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophyhc vepeletion'and wetland icy hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or Sandy Greyed Matrix(S4) _Redox Depressions(F8) problematic. Restrictive Layer(It present): Type: None Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yos X No Remarks: . HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicatorsr. Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(Al) - X Water stained Leaves(69)(Except MLRA. Water stained Leaves(89) 1,2.4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA1,2,4A,and 4B) X High Wirer Table(A2), X Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(BIM - Drainage Pattems(B10) Water Marks(B1) Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(82) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drill Deposits(B3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3). X Geomorphic Position(02) Algal MM or Crust(B4) --Presence of Reduced Iron(04) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(65) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(Co Fax-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soil Cracks(88) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(DS)(LRR A) _ _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches). Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): $ Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes. X No Depth(Inches)'. 0 Yes X. No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring web,aerial photos,previous inspections).if available: None Remarks:. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D • APP , 99f111 • • +. PHS d 4726 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region ProjectSite: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 611012011 Applicant/Owner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point 5 Investigator(s): M Ecclestonfa Turner Section,Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34. Landform(Mlslope,terrace,etc.:) Terrace Local relief(concave;Convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let: 44.04392 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (t no.explain in Remarks) Me vegetation _ Soit_ or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? (YIN) V Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing...ampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?. Yes X No Is Sampled Area within Hydric SO Present? Yes X No a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .X No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? Status Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 )- Number of Dominant Species•1' Populus trlchocarpa 75 X FAC Thelma OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 _ Species Across All Strata: 2, .(B) 75 =Total Cover §aalMotShrub Stratum, (plot sire: S. ) Percent of Dominant Species 1 Fraxlnus latitoll§ 30 X . FACW That are OBL,FACW, or FAC: . . . 100% (NB) 2 3 . Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiplyby: 5 _ OBL Species x1= 0 . '30 =Total Cover FACW species x2= 0 FAC Species xa= 0 Herb Stratum (Mot size: ) PAW Species 1 x4= 0 1 UPL Species x S. 0 • 2 Column Totals . 0 (A) 0 . (B) 3 4 Prevalence Index=WA= ADIVIOI 5 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:. 7 - - 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6 X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 0 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sire: ) data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 -' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain) o =Total Cover 'Indicators of hyddc loll and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum . . Vegetation Yes X No Present? Remarks: PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O APP. 2 22013 • • SOIL PHSO 4725 Sampling Point: 6 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confrro the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' La' Texture- Remarks 0-4 10YR 312 100 Slit Loam 4-18 10YR 312 80 7.5YR 414 20 C M Silt Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced MatruL CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore lining, M=Matrix: Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(A1) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 can Muck(A10) Histic EPipedon(A2) _ Shipped Matrix(S8) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(M) _loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Redox Dark Surfers(FS) Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Inxlkators of hydrophylic vegetation end Welland ) hydrology must be present.unless disturbed or Sandy Gloved Matrix(54) Redox Depressions(Fe) problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: None Depth(Inches): Hydric Solt Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one requited;check all that apply) . Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(Al) X Water stained Leaves(89)(Except MLRA X Water stained Leaves(B9) High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 48) (Except MLRAI,2,4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(B11) Drainage Patters(B10) Water Marks(B1) _Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(132) _Hydrogen Sotlide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(03) _Oxidized Rhixospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Positron(D2) Algal Mat or Crost(84) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitad(D3) Iron Deposits(B5) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(C6) X Fac-Neutral Test(05) Surface Sod Cracks(88) Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)(LRR A) Raised Mt Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) _Omer(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations: i Surface Water Present? Yes _ .NO X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >18 .. Wotland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes NO X Depth(inches): >18. Yes X No (nudes capillary hinge) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,modtodng well aerial photos,previous inspections),if evadable: None Remarks:. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 9 9. 71111 • • • PHS O 4725 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: City of Springfield City/County: Glenwood/Lane Sampling Date: 5110/2011 ApplicantrOwner: City of Springfield State: OR Sampling Point:. 6 Investigator(s): M EcclestonlC Tumor Section.Township,Range: T 17 South,Range 3 West,Section 34 Landform(hiilsiope,terrace.etc.:) Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): LRRA Let 44.04332 Long: 123.04697 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Chehalis Silty Clay Loam NWI Classification: Are climaticihydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (if no.explain In Remarks) Are vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology signiScantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? CON) Y Are vegetation _ Soil_ o&Hydrology naturally problematic? If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?, Yes No X Is Sampled Area within Mythic Soil Present? Yes No X a Wetland? Yea No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X' Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %cover Species? . Status Tree Stratum (plot size: 1 Number of Dominant Species 1, That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across Ag Strata: 3 (B) 0 =Total Cover. $aognolShrub Stratum (plot size: 6 ) Percent of Dominant Species I Crataegus douglasll 5 X FAC That am OBL.FACW, or FAC: 33% (NB) 2 Rubus discolor 15 X FACU 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 4 Total%Cover of Multiply by: 5 OBL Species x1.= 0 20 =Total Cover FACW species k 2= 0 FAC Species x 3.=. 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 6 ) FACU Species x 4:= 0 1 Nedera helix 70 X UPL UPL Species x 5= 0 • 2 _ Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B) 3 4 Prevalence Index=WA= ODIVI01' 5 6 . Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:. 7 1-Rapid Test(Cr Hydrophytic VegetaUon 8 _ _ 2-Dominance lest is>50% 70 =Total Cover 3-Prevalence bides is S 3.0' 4-Morphological Adaptations'(provide supporting Woolf Vme Stratum (plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 7 5-.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 2 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain). 0 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soi and wetland hydrology must be present,unless, . disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10. Vegetation Yes . No X Present?. Remarks: PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 • • III SOIL PHS 9 4725 Sampling Point: 6 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) 11, Color(moist) % Type' Lock Texture Remarks 0-11 10VR 313 100. Silt Loam 11-17 10YR 313 100 Silty Clay Loam 'Type:C.Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore lining, M=Malt&. Hydric Soli Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless othorwlso noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(A1) Sandy Redox(55) 2 cm Muck(A10) Hlslie Epipedon(A2) _Stripped Matrix(SB) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Hiatt(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain N Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Ai2) Redox Dark Surface(FB) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si)- Depleted Dark Surface(F7) •'Indicators of tiydrophylk vegetation and wetland ( hydrology must be present.unless disturbed or Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) __Radon Depresskms(Fa) problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: None- Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes, No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY - . Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary indicators(minimum of one required;cheek all that apply) Secondary indicators(2 or more required). Surface Water(A1) Water stained Leaves(69)(Except MLRA. Water stained Leaves(89), High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 4B) (Except MLRA1,2,1A,and 46). Saturation(A3) _Salt Crust(B11) Drainage Patterns(610) Water Marks(61) _Aquatic invertebrates(013) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(62) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _Oxidized 12hizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(02) Algal Mat or Crust(64) _Presence of Reduced iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(65) _Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils(CC) Fee-Neutral Test(D5). Surface Sol Cracks(BB) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A). Raised Mt Mounds(DB)(LRR A) inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BS) Field Observations: Surface Water.Present? Yes NO X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yea. No X Depth(inches): Yes No X (irrludai caphary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well.Serial photos,previous inspections),if available: None Remarks: PRE SUBMI1 IAL RECD APR 2 2 2013 . , ' • • Appendix C Site Photos s ... ererl. 7:4,44:0:740,:1),:" ',. .7.74t. p H s . . , Li e.:‘,.....„„e-i,_....xsc1� a 20;, ,.rs,. ` 4'i W i"1ne . u Js ? .k. ,/ Y ti F f, . t+ "�Fw .ib4T +y., i .> :?':;-� l PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2': 2013 , III 4111 • `" sr . Y _` *,,.,..A. -1:-� ,:. , __?• r • ,�`. ' Photo A I. 4 - ' `' ,r- Photo was taken looking 0:101-; ;r- .'": .: •w ;• = southwest at the ponded ` d e'1 ; -. -s r ti 4,1.k.:.1 portion of Wetland A. • 4.y1}. • . (-• „ f r l % k•�wY4,: I, 4-� ,l`"..L 1_.. -.- "¶. ;`,,:',v>,.7,...1! +` . :.%4 -:..1 q .`. Pre hi.0" •-,,..,....A.:› r fir. .' y} :.1 . . _ .�. {, wL Photo k'�r,,i . 4.. , ,'r .. 1 A. Ala ,r ,► It Photo was taken looking ..—• ` ,,.11:11 ; " '�• ,¢ . northwest at the ponded ::' ti t"•+ w r"-. ! 1° portion of Welland A. k—; . , .;;� - •■•N .. 11 . ,i,.....!.fr 4,Is I 7' '„,„-' .3. v 1 0 (4 j`V' 1 ''''-:--1" ✓J` f f 4 • T ': ig _..', .,. f - . .M i Projod#4725 61212011 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken on May 10, 2011. PRE-SUBMITTAL RECT Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. ATI1 2 ;G LU I d . • 0 • 1 ` `.fir , . '„ + Photo C ,, ,\; .a (•, Ip i it ,;'e. .�I I' ,1 Photo was taken looking t ; ; �" V i. f' west at Wetland A. • 1 1. . ' ? . , . : c 1 f 1 ,,, s .7friiirw4 pf, . , 11 1 ' \I , :I.. '•C•' aillS5'A..4111140 --r.' --.i Photo D • Photo taken looking north .,� ',,, .i:;� � at the mowed lawn area, 1 ``�. .' +s' ` located north of Wetland 1 y" . . . 1. .' .lbw - �� -- -NANO '. ` T HHRR``6 Project j 1 25 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken on May 10, 2011. pR -SUbIVI�i ii1/4i. REC E'. �""�" -.Pacific llabitat Services,Inc., pPR 2 2 2013 • • Wii War .r .. •-, , 1., ! frl'-.. .'. i ,r:` Photo was tae g *• + ,1, .', , ..:.: • ;�;c, f east at the forested portion -':�Y' t 1 i,. ,� % ,y 1 i r>. .ii if - -.:t` , of Wetland A. +i��fi�fill, '; `. , : L� t �!pl , X171'';; 1, --7' .' {' -r f _P,.)..• • ■ -' r .•.o,A, 7~ - 4 -Tr - !rte ..y w (t ;-...1.`-- * t � Ti_i;r' ''‘'.. YTS 4t..... -4 r�• _.404 ) .41;'l. e-A! , _ -41111r At. Photo F + i ., �r;,�0 , Q' � ,. qk,y, F '1 its,. �r ' •• Photo was taken looking ��•+`C�'x '01 ` � �ry44ry1. # 1'' -' 4, "'t► ■ -- ' south at the forested �' •+�i :�• '-� ' "-�►'•'� it '" portion of Wetland A. '�,",� fit :.,•,Y' - > :` ,t `. _• A. .� ,'�`� j A ; - - - O. y Pniect It 125 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken trot t Y Y 9 on May 10, 2011. PRE-SUBM1TfAL REr"f ((INn AP 2 �n', `l� —Pacific Habitat Servicca,Inc. PP tR 2 We! 0 • .- . • ... 'MI hp.t--,.. . i '. ..e■%., . ' )7,,,,i . , 3,,yl, .0.... .;:.1.17 . ":•,-. . 'r‘ 4 „ ' _.;% ,- . Photo G . Xi., '4 .alo • .'L -3, : •• 4- - c. ..:-: ..,, •'.. 4 'I! '....t" i Aid •It ' . •1i. - Photo was taken looking • .1." _- ' • • .• A '. 1 g - northeast at lax lot 500. . 1 -Iimitimsit.,1, I ' : _ • • , , ,. -:..• . . . , , . . . . . . . . .1 . ,,.J • '-'' '. • '.. ■ ,, . ' . .. - . .--'? • • ■ , • •■ ." •.'-- ,7 .. ' .k • ' . • , '-. or.: . .....\ ''. ". .1.''..11 ..ti, q , fs 4i .., % '-'1,k _,• 0.,•,,s, ,I..,.. tr. Photo H "-- °Al°? . F. -. Cr' '14 -4. .., ., 4 f. _ r4 7--IV .17ar• - •' a r• , - 1 , 4 ..--• / - '4.4-.. . 11,1 . . •— . ..'t •.-r .. . . ;)4 ..010, glikk r IIII....t):, ‘.) Photo taken looking west - -. -•-• .-$., . it‘iltii it,i If.10,x,, ,it k .0.. at Wetland A. t • - "-:'!"-.- *••in N fr 1,.A 1:r4;. i 7P.1/4.,,.1- • :••• ; ', 0 .- % . • , ,..,„ •••,..- , • . ..," • ;•• .0. .4p .,• 7.,•'. -..... v A- '• ;1%.... : •pt.'16 . 1 -'.:.•drilt ‘1,;0** ' . ., i'w :' • ' ''110.,ti.-:-. 4: .." . g,.. 4 • t' • k''..- ....‘"44'..;.,lil il •,‘ . ' 0 K 1p ,:i!,* ...:4%-, /,‘ 1: -,•. ' 1' '; ta ' ' ' :, . 71-. .4-, -0,'' .....tp:'?•.' i 1. ,, '.rt-.- ••• '1;4. .1 •• 411,ifiit_ .. ' ;f .1.g ■-•,, . " .! • , s. - . ;:.1-1‘ ..'■ - - - . ,,.. . • . -. • . ... !I ,- . ' . . •. :• '- A- •--- .s. '-..;.-:.,--- -- ... ./..;#40■• - .--7 •i. . : • • • . ':-• 'e'lr-- wIlr-5,•*."1'‘-."".-, . .4 • • , t 71F-Z.14.- ....b..11:- - . . Y • dei,,A•7 • . .... ..."tai.;,,,,'-•,.......,. ivo*;Aiojoscto , 44,7.1.,, ,,,,...ive . -- ;.•-•:".''•"" ....40/4-■ . -alk. '' :L. ' -•- " fztaliii...r.ir . — • •, 4... ...r . •Y e -• _de - , .4-T-•4,.":.:-%;,- '-- ' ,. .- .t . -..-4‘..-- ........_ ' . - --■-•-4 • . .44 ''...-,.... '.4:104 • • . . 1 • .cp e'- , ..1',4•• .- • '-- .. ,,S.Ahheitire 'i'• .---.". ' Project#4725 61212011 Photo documentation of the City of Springfield site in Lane County, Oregon. Photos taken on May 10, 2011. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D ,.,..c. ,,. a —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. .6.P H 2 z All • • Appendix D Wetland Definitions, Methodology F p„ :- _11:1 1-„steresolinam + IPF{ S T 9r In. 1s'T s PI) yy fY :l 41 s®"°c.M 9.6t L.tl7. ;,�FP,,` , fi fir' y 1 tf � ��'bb .. .., 'W Yi}G T�Rr wlp Ep� •YLz �$� y,y '{ ...\\ P' , '-� � :1 ' .11 '�:'2� • 3+Y.�SA�'ii34%.•- ..='� APR 2 2 2013 • • WATERS OF THE STATE AND WETLAND DEFINITION AND CRITERIA Regulatory Jurisdiction Wetlands and water resources in Oregon are regulated by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) under the Removal-Fill Law(ORS 196.800-196390)and by the U.S.Army Corps of • • , Engineers(COE)through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The primary source documents for wetland delineations within Oregon is the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (Environmental Laboratory 1987)and the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region,which are recognized by both DSL and COE. Waters of the State and Wetland Definition Waters of the State are defined as"natural waterways including all tidal and nontidal bays, intermittent streams,constantly flowing streams, lakes,wetlands and other bodies of water in this state, navigable and nonnavigable...". "Natural waterways"is further defined as waterways created naturally by geological and hydrological processes,waterways that would be natural but for human-caused disturbances(e.g.channelized or culverted streams, impounded waters; partially drained wetlands or ponds created in wetlands).: '(DSL,2001). Wetlands are defined as"those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions"(DSL, 2001). Wetland Criteria Based on the above definition,three major factors characterize a wetland: hydrology,substrate, and biota. Wetland Hydrology Wetland hydrology is related to duration of saturation, frequency of saturation, and critical depth of saturation.The 1987 manual defines wetland hydrology as inundation or saturation within a major portico of the root zone(usually above 12 inches),typically for at least 12.5%of the. growing season.The wetland hydrology criterion can be met,.however, if saturation within the major portion of the root zone is present for only 5%of the growing season,depending on other evidence. The growing season is defined as the portion of the year when soil temperatures at 12.0 inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero(41 degrees Fahrenheit,5 degrees Celsius), but also allows approximation from frost free days, based on air temperature.The growing season for any given site or location is determined from.US.Natural.Resources Conservation Service,(formerly Soil Conservation Service)data and information. PRE'SUBMITfAL RECI® Appendix D—Wetland Definition and Methodology APR 2 2 2013 I'acific Habitat.Services,Inc. Page 1 • • Wetland hydrologic indicators include the following: visual observation of inundation or saturation, watermarks,drift lines,sediment deposits,and/or oxidized rhizospheres with living roots. Oxidized rhizospheres are defined as yellowish-red zones around the roots and rhizomes of some plants that grow in frequently saturated soils. Other indicators of hydrology, including algal mats or crust, iron deposits,surface soil cracks,sparsely vegetated concave surface,salt crust,aquatic invertebrates,hydrogen sulfide odor,reduced iron, iron reduction in tilled soils, and stunted or stressed plants can also be used to determine the presence of wetland hydrology. Wetland Substrate(Soils) Most wetlands are characterized by hydric soils. Hydrio soils are those that are ponded, flooded, or saturated for long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions. Periodic saturation of soils causes alternation of reduced and oxidized conditions, which leads to the formation of redoximorphic features(gleying and mottling). Mineral hydric soils will be either gleyed or will have bright mottles and/or low matrix chroma.The redoximorphic feature known as gley is a result of greatly reduced soil conditions,which result in a characteristic grayish, bluish or greenish soil color.The term mottling is used to describe areas of contrasting color within a soil matrix.The soil matrix is the portion of the soil layer that has the predominant color. Soils that have brightly colored mottles and a low matrix chroma are indicative of a fluctuating water table. Hydric soil indicators include: organic content of greater than 50%by volume,and/or presence of redoximorphic features and dark soil matrix, as determined by the use of a Munsell Soil Color Chart.This chart establishes the chroma,value and hue of soils based on comparison with color chips.Mineral hydric soil must meet one of the 16 definitions for hydric soil indicators,or be classified as a"problem soil" in the Interim Regional Supplement. Wetland Biota(Vegetation) Wetland biota is defined as hydrophytic vegetation. A hydrophyte is a plant species that,is capable of growing in substrates that are periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of saturated soil conditions.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in We/lands,have established five basic groups of vegetation based on their frequency of occurrence in wetlands. These categories, referred to as the"wetland indicator status",are as follows: obligate wetland plants(OBL), facultative wetland(FACW), facultative (FAC),facultative upland(FACU), and obligate upland(UPL).Table 1 gives a definition of the plant indicator codes. Table 1. Description of Wetland Plant Indicator Status Codes Indicator• , :u';' . . Code' ste'tus OBL Obligate wetland.Estimated to occur almost exclusively in wetlands(>99%). FACW Facultative wetland.Estimated to occur 67-99%of the time in wetlands. FAC Facultative.Occur equally in wetlands and non-wetlands(34-66%). FACU Facultative upland. Usually occur in non-wetlands(67-99%). UPL Obligate upland.Estimated to occur almost exclusively in non-wetlands(>99%). If a species is not assigned to one of the four groups described above it is assumed to be obligate upland. NI Has not yet received a wetland indicator status, but is probably not obligate upland. 6� Appendix D—wetland Definition and Methodology PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D Pacific Habitat Services;Inc. Page 2 APR 2 2 2013 • • Observations of hydrology, soils,and vegetation,were made using the "Routine On-site" delineation method as defined in the 1987 manual and the Interim Regional Supplement for areas that were not currently in agricultural production. One-foot diameter soil pits were excavated to 20 inches and soil profiles were examined for hydric soil and wetland hydrology field indicators. In addition, a visual absolute-cover estimate of the dominant species of the plant community was performed using soil pit locations as a center of reference. Dominant plant species are based on estimates of absolute cover for herbaceous,and shrub species within a 5 foot radius of the _.. sample point, andbasal area cover for tree and woody vine species within.a 30.foot radius of the _. ,.. sample point. Plant species in each vegetative layer,which are estimated at less than 20%of the total cover,are not considered to be dominant.The wetland indicator status is then used to determine if there is an overall dominance(greater than 50%)of wetland or upland plant species. If less than 50%of the dominant species are hydrophytic,then the prevalence index may be used to determine if the subdominant species are hydrophytic. If the prevalence index is less than or equal to 3,hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met. During data collection,the soil profiles were examined for hydric soil and wetland hydrology field indicators.Plant species and cover were recorded. Data was recorded on standard data sheets which contain the information specified in the 1987 Corps Manual and the Interim Regional Supplement. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D APR 2 2 2013 Appendix U—Wetland Definition and Methodology Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Page 3 • • I !!!!!! , 1111 ', . '111,-„Y.I.”.113,' • , . :. , I-1-III i 1 iv ',. • • • g - i_ ® '1'.. iji .. . . 0 i 1 i t - m c I 1 ' .;-: . , Oil 14 t , i ii -- - - I__,4 ..!,?.. . - ' ip 1.1 0 I 11 ,, ' i • ; ' , 1.. rt. ' , : .. •,. i .• . ' . , t- my .. , • F !!I M L . ' wi ‘\ • 1 - ' '' . U • esi 0 •• 1 .1. ' 0 •• . il , ■•■■ ›-•ICI . . I... . •.1, ti ' o _i;. -- -- 1•01 rq . , i .-.:., i ,.; I ts iti ,. . . . I . , , _ ,....:_. __,. _. _ !. ,..,, ... . • . .• ._,... a A 1 • ''•1`'''-'" . ,';- / .. II i N N I II!, ' k k • Viik, . i .--i.' / . ,4 , r • • • " / :_ ! i . . ,,...,. ...... :., . :% 1 . II la , . ; .... •1,. , twelP1-:: - A t A • • .' . . I ...',..--KAR,•,-.•,• /7-.f.:I — 1 1- , 1t A' J Ai t ,. it,, 1 i .. , / :- •14: ,., , . • . - • • .11•NO •• ' . '•' nil . .. - .." • • • 1 I. A . • . !.- .-. fo. ,., • i tblikpi I A: -. * .. ___ • -•- . .•-4.14- , . • t k . . • -.7 •_.,,- . • 4-. _ ....,?,..,...., i • ... . _ . • O ,., • . ,. ..c:#47-5-• ,- • •-• : ,,.., : .-...nr,. " . , . . .,":: .11 1■1 i . ' ...t o -: •.. 11'I • • ' .. ,.1.' ! ' I it' \'''' . : 11 ,.. . j . . .- / : • 0 . : 3 ! .o ' -. ' '''..f• ti...,....1.,.....4L:7 III 1 .2 .,.....,-,4 .\ ...:■.t......,:4.1 1 .. '.."4 ' ..... "III 41.1 . 0 4, • 1 1 . . .. ''l 1 . ..., . 'x , . \ . 1 - 41Fi:''' , . , • . . , ,,.•' .t„,., J`' nt . , • ... ,,, .. 1 ar-...a......4 .. -7, -- ".1. 1!1 ....„, - „.... .- --, • ,,,.., . , ,. ....: : .•,... c , 7. • .ta..._4,_-.i.,..,.....114 .1.. • ...•il 1 . ,.,s ., ..-•./.. . ....., .,„, • \ .,t 1.r.........: s: 4: )1.. ..w.t...!,:..._.:.,_!•;4441' . . 4 ..-;,, ,..,,'7.2.4,,,, •. 1 • I k.'' eta Ilr _ .._±,-:-.6.-7.44.‘,..- UlaiL,-.....; --...... -, -, .. _,..„..., - . ... • ..... ..— - -...... ,. --