HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 6282 11/19/2012ORDINANCE NO 6282
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY METROPOLITAN WASTEWATER SERVICE DISTRICT, AND
W ILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT; AND WITHDRAWING THE SAME
TERRITORY-FROM THE RAINBOW WATER AND FIRE DISTRICT
THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FINDS THAT:
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code (SDC) Article 5.7 -100 and
ORS Chapter 222 to accept, process, and act on annexations to the City; and
WHEREAS, a request to annex certain territory was submitted on August 30, 2012, said territory being
described as follows:
A portion of the 16" Street right -of -way and Lot 4, Block 4 of the plat of FIRST ADDITION TO
DELROSE ADDITION, within Township 17 South, Range 03 West, Section 24, Map 34 as generally
depicted and more particularly described in and on file in City Case Number C SP 2012 — ANX 12 -00001
and attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with SDC 5.7 -125.A and ORS 222.111, the property owners initiated the
annexation action by submittal of the required application forms and petition for annexation attached hereto as
Exhibit B to this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this annexation has been initiated in accordance with SDC 5.7 -125.A and ORS 222 and
has been set for public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene - Springfield Men-opolitan Area
General flan (more commonly known as the Metro Plan) urban growth boundary and is contiguous to the City
limits [SDC 5.7- 140.A]; and,
WHEREAS, the annexation is consistent with Policy 10, page II -C -4; Policy 16, page 11 -C -5; and
Policy 21, page II -C -6, in the Memo Plan [SDC 5.7- 140.13] requiring annexation to the City of Springfield as the
highest priority for receiving urban services; and
WHEREAS, the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly and
efficient manner as required in Metro Plan Policy 8, page 11 -C -4, and there is a logical area and time within which
to deliver urban services and facilities [SDC 5.7- 140.C]; and,
WHEREAS, provision of City urban services to the subject property has been arranged through
preparation of a utility servicing plan to meet the City's requirements for the provision of the minimum level of
key urban services and facilities (Exhibit C); and,
WHEREAS, a Staff Report (Exhibit D) was presented to the City Council with the Director's
recommendation to concurrently annex the subject territory to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service
District and Willamalane Park and Recreation District, as these special districts are service providers for the City
[SDC 5.7- 140.13]; and is consistent with the intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and Springfield
regarding boundary changes dated May 21, 2008; and,
WHEREAS, a Staff Report was presented to the City Council with the Director's recommendation to
concurrently withdraw the annexation territory from the Rainbow Water and Fire District as the Springfield Utility
Board would provide water utility service directly to the area after it was annexed to the City [SDC 5.7- 160.B];
and.
WHEREAS, on November 5, 2012, the Springfield Common Council conducted a public hearing and is
now ready to take action on this application based on the recommendation and findings in support of approving the
annexation request, and the Rainbow Fire and Water District's withdrawal as set forth in the aforementioned Staff
Report to the Council, incorporated herein by reference, and the evidence and testimony presented at this public
hearing held in the matter of adopting this Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby approve annexation of the
following described territory to the City of Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and
Willamalane Park and Recreation District, said territory being described as follows:
A portion of the 16" Street right -of -way and Lot 4, Block 4 of the plat of FIRST ADDITION TO
DELROSE ADDITION, within Township 17 South, Range 03 West, Section 24, Map 34 as generally
depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A.
SECTION 2: The withdrawal of territory described in Section 1 above from the Rainbow Water and Fire
District shall become effective on June 30, 2013.
SECTION 1 The City Manager or the Development and Public Works Director shall send copies of this
Ordinance to affected State and local agencies as required by SDC 5.7 -155.
SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days from the date of its passage by the City
Council and approval by the Mayor, or upon the date of its filing with the Secretary of State as provided by ORS
222.180, whichever date is later.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 19tbay of November 2012,
by a vote of 6 for and 0 against.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 19th day of November 2012.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Recor ' r
RE'6 CU` & APPROVED
AQ TO FORM
DATE:
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO -6282
ch
H �
N0"
� J
r
w
(Ij�
=W
Asa
ms.
LL
O
ATTACHMENT 1 -1
Exhibit A -1
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Annexation. Application Type IV
Exhibit B -1
SPRINGFIELD
.. ..
Annexation Application Pre- Submittal: p
Annexation Agglication Submittal: I X
Proposal Required ..
Property Owner: Diane Mattison -Notta e & John Notta a
Phone:
541- 913 -7635
Address: 2315 W.21s`Avenue, Eu gene, OR 97405
Phone:
541 - 285 -1054
E -mail:
d1.matt19540 mall.com
Owner Signature:
Owner Signature:
Agent Name
/A
Phone
Company:
Fax:
Address:
E -mail
Agent Signature:
.tf the app0cant Is ot4e "r;2han the owner, the owner' hereby',grants perriLsslor��for the applicant -to act N hIs`or h&. behaf except:, ,
wtjere slgriatures of tF a owner -of iewrd are.Fegufred onlythe owner.Finay slgrr hhe pet2 on, ,?' ', , +, 4.,a
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO:
17- 03 -24 -34
TAX LOT NOS : 1105
Pro a Address:
2576 16`h Street
Area of Request:
Acres: 0.20
Square Feet: 8,712 ft2
Existing Use(s)
Residential
of Property:
Proposed Use .
'Same
of Property:
Required Property Information ON 1n6ikeStaff:'
ANk17--0000 f Date:
Cotpp
'i I3initials
Reviewed By:
on)-,
/j
7Aion Fee:
2+f7�j.p(
Postage Fee:
��f�,�
Total Fee:
3p(7.DI
Date Received:
� AUG 302012_
ATTACHMENT 1 -1
Original Submittal Q�
Exhibit B -2
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre - submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre - Submittal
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his /her behalf.
I /we do hereby acknowledge that I /we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Owner:
Date:
Signature
Print
Submittal
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre - Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided If not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application.
Owner:���
�7 Date
Signature
U(Q'/LY . t A z,
Print a
Date Received:
AUG 3 0 2012
original Submittal
ATTACHMENT 1 -2
Exhibit B -3
8/14/2012
John Nottage and Diane Mattison- Nottage
Annexation narrative for 2576 16th Street
During the process of planning an addition to our house we had the septic system inspected and
discovered the tank had cracked and the system had failed. We are within 300' of an existing
sewer system and Oregon state law requires that we connect to that system. We contacted Lane
County and the City of Springfield and it was determined that we needed to build a lateral
connection to the sewer. As part of that process we are also required to be annexed into the city.
n
ATTACHMENT t -3
Date Received:
AUG 302612
Original Submittal
r'I
Cd
O
IL
h
1
a
r
0
#o
c m
o
Y
IO
'a U
Q �
Q
1
R
LU
n
Ln
LU Ln O
ro
O N
I- U N
> N
Z :6 LC2)
H H 0
O C�
H O N
Ln
y v
X N
O Q V
EN
a
C
C �
E
L �
U al
C-0
OU N
a7
V tC
bN
a, o
O C
o
L � '
a
cn a�0i
0 L
O U
J_+
U-0
C
a) m
L N
Y Y
L
Y a7
Ca
O a)
'u C
X 0
N N
E E
C m
(U =_
0)
V
C
O @
C U
Ln Mn
C
U
v
oU_
Z
a)
L
NL
y '
O t0
•3 v
O N
O �
w
v �
N �
w N
0 0
(n a
O O
C N
3
C
a) 0
0 U
o U.
CL 0
O C
C •J
0 o
C
O O
a) m
X
Y
aj C U
C
U
H
0
L
O
V-.
7
C
C
C Q
O
O
NN
b
rn
m
n
•o �
w'
a
3
_n
v
a �
1 J 3
>
t
O
pp
L
�
w°
Ln
o
0
0
o
E O
E
c
A
`y
m
Z o
O
0
0
O
Z o
O
O
o`
O
rn
E
�
E
v
M
M M
m
z
z
_
N
N
>
E
Fo^
Y
C
4
\O
J\
o
C
p.
�
mw
O
O
S.1
I v
Ma E
n
IN
\�
v
N
TS
E
I
.I0
d
0
L
V-.
7
C
C
L
NN
b
rn
rn
n
•o �
w'
w'
3
_n
Y
pp
c
A
`y
O
v
E
�
s
m
z
z
�
Y
C
4
\O
J\
o
C
p.
�
c
S.1
I v
o
Y
\�
v
N
TS
i
E
I
.I0
d
i
L
N
7
O
c
�
3
Y
pp
u
L
u
u
U
0
L
N
Oi
v
a
u
Q
m
3
c
0
N
0
LCs
7 V
o L Exhibit B -4
Late Received:
Y Y
cu
HL
O U
>N
is ")ridnal
N
O
L X
Q y
L •
AUG 3 02012
RECEIVED
SEP 2 6 2012
E 0 Lane l;ounry
T y Z Assessment & TeKahon
3a C
O Q
C O
—E�
w�
v N N
NI O CO
u v
� V L
+you
N N
W N l
N
C o L
o u
Y L
N
O C
Mn
OI
.jr.. v E
� L
. m m
� k2
L U
P C
NI O ii
CU
N
d m
j
L � �
C L �
O L
O
CL r
CV a)
ryvo� 11I
OH t
O
W o o m C
L —
a 40
p'0 o
m 4
LL
O c c
Z a) V O
O C G
N3aLn
Qom`'
C C qs
M
12.2 Q
LL.
N Ou y 0 (�
~ O a O
u
LY N N y
LU
UFY o.
r=
u
U
1 �
U
Q)
� c
Of
v
�
N
3
Y
u
L
u
u
U
0
L
N
Oi
v
a
u
Q
m
3
c
0
N
0
LCs
7 V
o L Exhibit B -4
Late Received:
Y Y
cu
HL
O U
>N
is ")ridnal
N
O
L X
Q y
L •
AUG 3 02012
RECEIVED
SEP 2 6 2012
E 0 Lane l;ounry
T y Z Assessment & TeKahon
3a C
O Q
C O
—E�
w�
v N N
NI O CO
u v
� V L
+you
N N
W N l
N
C o L
o u
Y L
N
O C
Mn
OI
.jr.. v E
� L
. m m
� k2
L U
P C
NI O ii
CU
N
d m
j
L � �
C L �
O L
O
CL r
CV a)
ryvo� 11I
OH t
O
W o o m C
L —
a 40
p'0 o
m 4
LL
O c c
Z a) V O
O C G
N3aLn
Qom`'
C C qs
M
12.2 Q
LL.
N Ou y 0 (�
~ O a O
u
LY N N y
LU
UFY o.
r=
u
U
1 �
U
Q)
� c
Of
v
Exhibit B -5
FORM 2 Date Received:
AUG 3 0 2012
OWNERSHIP WORKSHEET
Original Submittal
(This form is NOT the petition)
(Please include the name and address of ALL owners regardless of whether they
signed an annexation petition or not.
OWNERS
Property Designation
(Map /lot number)
Name of Owner
Acres
Assessed
Value
Imp.
Y / N
Signed
Yes
Signed
No
17- 03 -24 -34 -00105
Diane Mattison - Nottage
0.2
$127,966
Y
Y
$127,966
17- 03 -24 -34 -00105
John Nottage
0.2
$127,966
Y
Y
TOTALS:
0.2
$127,966
TOTAL NUMBER OF OWNERS IN THE PROPOSAL
2
NUMBER OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED
2
PERCENTAGE OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED
100%
TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROPOSAL
0.2
ACREAGE SIGNED FOR
0.2
PERCENTAGE OF ACREAGE SIGNED FOR
1000%
TOTAL VALUE IN THE PROPOSAL
$127,966
VALUE CONSENTED FOR
$127,966
PERCENTAGE OF VALUE CONSENTED FOR
1000/6
ATTACHMENT 1 -5
FORM 3
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
AUG 3 0 2012
Original Submittal 0-
(Complete aU the following questions and provide all the requested information. Attach
any responses that require additional space, restating the question or request for
information on additional sheets.)
Contact Person: Diane Mattison- Nottage
E -mail: di.matt1954&imai1.com
Supply the following information regarding the annexation area.
• Estimated Population (at present): 4
• Number of Existing Residential Units: 1
• Other Uses:
• Land Area: 0.2 total acres
• Existing Plan Designation(s): Low Density Residential
• Existing Zoning(s): Low Density Residential
• Existing Land Use(s): Residential
• Applicable Comprehensive Plan(s): Metro Plan
• Applicable Refinement Plan(s): None
• Provide evidence that the annexation is consistent with the applicable
comprehensive plan(s) and any associated refinement plans. Property is inside
the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary and is zoned and designated for low.
density residential development
• Are there development plans associated with this proposed annexation?
Yes ✓ No
If yes, describe.
Connection of existing residence to City sanitary sewer system
• Is the proposed use or development allowed on the property under the current
plan designation and zoning?
Yes ✓ No
• Please describe where the proposed annexation is contiguous to the city limits
(non- contiguous annexations cannot be approved under 5.7 -140, Criteria).
Property is contiguous to the current City Limits upon concurrent annexation of a
portion of 16`" Street right -of -way
ATTACHMENTS -6
Exhibit B -7
Does this application include all contiguous property under the same ownership?
Yes ✓ No
If no, state the reasons why all property is not included:
• Check the special districts and others that provide service to the annexation
area:
❑ Glenwood Water District Q Rainbow Water and Fire District
❑ Eugene School District ❑ Pleasant Hill School District
* Springfield School District ❑ McKenzie Fire & Rescue
❑ Pleasant Hill RFPD ❑ Willakenzie RFPD
❑ EPUD ELI SUB
Q Willamaiane Parks and Rec District ❑ Other
• Names of persons to whom staff notes and notices should be sent, in addition to
applicant(s), such as an agent or legal representative.
(Name) (Name)
(Address) (Address)
(City) (zip) (City) (zip)
(Name) (Name)
(Address) (Address)
(City) (zip) (City) (Zip)
Date Received:
AUG 3 0 2012
Original Submittal —
ATTACHMENT 1 -7
Exhibit B -8
FORM 4
WAIVER OF ONE YEAR TIME LIMIT
FOR ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO ORS 222.173
This waiver of the time limit.is for the following described property:
17-03-24-'34-00105 2576 16`" Street
Map and Tax Lot Number Street Address of Property
ONE WAIVER OF TIME LIMIT FOR EACH PARCEL, PLEASE
We, the owner(s) of the property described above understand the
annexation process can take more than one year but desire to annex to have
City services. Therefore, we agree to waive the one -year time limitation on
this petition to annex established by Oregon Revised Statutes 222.173, and
further agree that this contract shall be effective [ ] indefinitely or [✓] until
August 13, 2013.
Date
Signatures of Leaal Owners
Please print or type name
Siqgature
Date Signed
Diane Mattison -Notts e
2 Xj /L
John Notts e
Date Received:
AUG 3 0 2012
Original Submittal
LC()G: L:IBC1200B BGUNfNANGE TRANS! ilONyVFY1CARON FOBMSISP8INGFIEID {30 -0308 UPoATEUlURM51PRE- SU&MIITAL ANNEXATSONAPp {iGTIUN IO -O)- 08.00[
last5ave. WoberZ,,3010
ATTACHMENT 1 -8
Exhiibit C
N
0
Ji
W�
LLl
Z0
1S HiZ I E�
63
LL
000
i
m � V
W n
n N Z
N o)
z
J
O
i cu
0, a°
a
—CU
N
s z N
ow mew
� awz Jo
Wm NW
- - - -- IIS H19I
— —r
i
t
' <W tn I
3w N
N
oa
co �W r
pm
N
EJ
e3a i
WIfiij��l[i
--- - - - - -- - -
❑ W m ❑
_ d
LO
ouE!► f!!
N N I N
\ N
i
1S H1SI �, 1
ATTACHMENTI
TYPE IV — ANNEXATION
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
File Name: 2576 16th Street Annexation
Owner(s) /Applicant(s):
John Nottage and Diane Mattison - Nottage
Case Number: C SP 2012 — ANX 12 -00001
Proposal Location:
Portion of 16th Street right -of -way and residential
lot municipally addressed as 2576 16th Street
(Map 17- 03- 24 -34, Tax Lot 105)
Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR)
with Urbanizable Fringe Overlay (UF -10)
Zoning After Annexation: LDR
Metro Plan Designation: LDR
Refinement Plan Designation: N/A
Application Submittal Date: August 30, 2012
Exhibit D - 1
ELD-1
Associated Applications: 811- SPR2012 -01516 (Plumbing permit for connection to sanitary sewer)
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
POSITION
REVIEW OF
NAME
MAII ING ADDRESS
Project Manager
Planning
And Limbird
Transportation Planning Engineer
Transportation
Michael Liebler
Public Works Civil Engineer
Streets and Utilities
Clayton McEachem
N541-736-1029
Deputy Fire Marshal
Fire and Life Safe
Gilbert Gordon
Building Official
Building
David Bowlsb
9
APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
POSITION
I NAME
PHONE
MAII ING ADDRESS
Applicants & Owners
John Nottage
Diane Mattison-Nottage
541- 913 -7635
2315 W 21' Avenue
Eugene, OR 97405
ATTACHMENT I -1
Exhibit D - 2
Review Process (SDC 5.7 -115): The subject annexation request is being reviewed under Type IV procedures,
without Planning Commission consideration.
Development Issues Meeting (SDC 5.7 -120): A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) is required of all third -
party annexation applications.
Finding: The property owners met with City staff when the failed septic system was first discovered in August,
2012. Because the failed septic system was deemed to be a potential health hazard, staff considers the initial
meeting to be a de facto Development Issues Meeting for the purpose of proceeding with annexation of the
subject territory. Staff did not charge a Development Issues Meeting fee for the initial meeting.
Conclusion: The requirement in SDC 5.7 -120 is met.
Annexation Initiation and Application Submittal (SDC 5.7 -125): In accordance with SDC 5.7- 125.B.2.b.i
and ORS 222.170(1), an annexation application may be initiated by "more than half the owners of land in the
territory, who also own more than half the land in the contiguous territory and of real property therein
representing more than half the assessed value of all real property in the contiguous territory consent in writing
to the annexation of their land ".
Finding: The property owners, who own all of the land and real property, and full assessed value of real
property in the contiguous territory have filed an application and petition requesting annexation to the City of
Springfield (Attachment 3).
Conclusion: The application requirements in SDC 5.7 -125 have been met.
Site Information: The annexation territory includes a residential lot and a linear segment of 16's Street
extending north from the property frontage to the portion of 160' Street within Map 17- 03- 24 -32, which is inside
the City limits. Annexation of a portion of the 16h Street right -of -way is recommended to create contiguity of
the subject lot to the existing City limits. The dimensions of the segment of 16d' Street right -of -way proposed
for annexation are approximately 60 feet wide by 148 feet long. The annexation territory comprises
approximately 17,620 ftZ (0.4 acre) and it abuts the Springfield City limits along the north boundary. At
present, along the subject property frontage 16's Street is developed with paving, curb and gutter, but lacks
sidewalks and street lighting. The subject annexation territory is intended to remain as public right -of -way and
no additional street frontage improvements will be required at this time.
Existing public services are provided to the annexation area as follows: police (Lane County Sheriff,
Springfield Police Department), schools (Springfield School District), roads (Lane County and City of
Springfield), and Fire (City of Springfield under contract). Rainbow Water and Fire District provides water and
contracts with the City for provision of fire service to the proposed annexation area. Upon annexation, the City
of Springfield will be entirely responsible for urban services, including electricity, water and fire response to
the subject area.
Notice Requirements (SDC 5.7 -130): Consistent with SDC 5.7 -130, notice was provided as follows:
Mailed Notice. Notice of the annexation application was mailed October 19, 2012, which is at least 14
days prior to the public hearing date, to the affected property owner(s); owners and occupants of
properties located within 300 feet of the perimeter of the affected territory; affected neighborhood
groups or community organizations officially recognized by the city that includes the affected territory;
affected special districts and all other public utility providers; and the Lane County Land Management
Division, Lane County Elections, and the Lane County Board of Commissioners.
ATTACHMENT I -2
Exhibit D - 3
Newspaper Notice. Notice of the November 5, 2012 public hearing was published in The Register -
Guard on October 22 & 29, 2012.
Posted Notice. Notice of the November 5, 2012 public hearing was posted in five public places in the
City: in two locations along the subject property frontage and 16th Street right -of -way; at the
Springfield City Hall and in the Development and Public Works office; and on the City of Springfield
website, on October 22, 2012.
Finding: Upon annexation of the subject property to the City the current LDR zoning will be retained, but the
Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District (UF -10) will no longer apply. Due to this change, the Oregon Department
of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) was notified in writing of the annexation proceedings more
than 45 days prior to the public hearing. Notification to DLCD was sent on September 12, 2012.
Conclusion: Notice of the public hearing was provided consistent with SDC 5.7 -130.
Recommendation to City Council (SDC 5.7 -135): The Director shall forward a written recommendation on
the annexation application to the City Council based on the approval criteria specified in Section 5.7 -140,
which are provided as follows with the SDC requirements, findings, and conclusions. The Director's
recommendation follows SDC 5.7 -140, Criteria.
Criteria (SDC 5.7 -140): The application may be approved only if the City Council finds that the proposal
conforms to the following criteria:
A. The affected territory proposed to be annexed is within the City's urban growth boundary; and is
1. Contiguous to the city limits; or
2. Separated from the City only by a public right of way or a stream, lake or other body of
water.
Finding: The subject annexation is located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary (UGB) of the
Eugene - Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). The annexation area abuts the Springfield
city limits along the north boundary and therefore meets the statutory definition of contiguity as found in ORS
222.111(1).
Finding: The legal description for the annexation area has been confirmed with the state Department of
Revenue to ensure there are no gaps or overlaps of territory between the existing City limits (located along the
north boundary of 16'h Street) and the annexation area.
Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion.
B. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any
applicable refinement plans or Plan Districts;
Finding: The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC)
in August, 1982 and has been subsequently amended. The annexation area is located within the acknowledged
UGB of the Metro Plan. Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield.
Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that, ultimately, all territory within the UGB will be annexed to an
existing city (Policy #10, page II -C -4; Policy #16, page II -C -S; and Policy #21, page II -C -6). Springfield is the
unit of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to annexed territory.
Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that as annexations to the City occur, existing special service districts
within the UGB will be dissolved (Policy #18, page II -C -6). The continued annexation of properties and public
ATTACHMENT 1 -3
Exhibit D - 4
street rights -of -way to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which will result in the
elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area.
Finding: The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The water district also has
service arrangements with Springfield for provision of fire response to unincorporated areas of north
Springfield. After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that withdrawal is in the best
interest of the City, the annexation area will be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water and Fire District consistent
with ORS 222.510, 222.520, and 222.525 and Springfield Utility Board will provide water service directly to
the annexation area.
Finding: After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of
the City, the annexation area will be annexed into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District as
authorized by an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City of Springfield and Lane County. This
special district was formed to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving
wastewater users within the City of Springfield.
Finding: After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of
the City, the annexation area will be annexed into the Willamalane Park and Recreation District as authorized
by an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Springfield and Lane County. The park district
provides park and recreation facilities and services to territory within the City of Springfield.
Finding: The subject annexation territory is not located in an adopted Refinement Plan area, and there are no
proposed changes to the current LDR zoning.
Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion.
C. The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities
and services as defined in the Metro Plan can be provided in an orderly efficient and timely manner,
and
Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key
urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas (Policies #8 and #10, page I1-C-4).
Finding: The territory requested for annexation will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are
already in place or can be logically extended to serve this area. In addition to urban utilities, the following
facilities and services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area:
Water — SUB Water provides water service to incorporated areas of north Springfield. Upon annexation, the
166 Street right -of -way is not expected to require water service, but existing and future water line connections
may be expected within the subject area as development and/or annexation proceeds on adjacent properties.
Existing water infrastructure within the vicinity will be maintained by the affected utility providers.
Electricity — SUB Electric provides service to developed properties in this area of Springfield. Upon
annexation, the subject territory is not expected to require additional electrical service. Existing electrical
system infrastructure within the adjacent public rights -of -way will be maintained by the affected utility
providers.
Police Services — Springfield Police Department currently provides service to areas of north Springfield that are
already inside the City. The subject territory is within the joint jurisdiction of Springfield Police Department
and Lane County Sheriffs Department. Upon annexation, this area will receive Springfield Police services on
an equal basis with other properties inside the City.
ATTACHMENT I -4
Exhibit D - 5
Fire and Emergency Services — Fire protection is currently provided to the annexation area by the City of
Springfield Fire & Life Safety under contract with Rainbow Water and Fire District. Upon annexation, the City
will continue to provide fire and emergency services to the subject territory. The nearest Springfield fire station
(Fire Station #3) is located on 28'h Street at the intersection with Centennial Boulevard.
Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by the Eugene /Springfield
Fire Department, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lane County. The annexation area will continue to
receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements
have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's
jurisdictions.
Parks and Recreation — Park and recreation services are provided to the City of Springfield by the Willamalane
Park and Recreation District. Indoor recreation facilities, such as the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lively
Park Swim Center, Memorial Building Community Center, and Willamalane Adult Activity Center will be
available to the property owners and residents of 2576 l6 d' Street. The park district offers various after- school
and other programs for children at schools and parks throughout the community. Also available are pathways
and several categories of parks, including community parks, sports parks, special use parks, and natural area
parks. The closest developed neighborhood park to the requested annexation area is Page Park at 1300 Hayden
Bridge Road. Other existing and future parks in the vicinity include Harvest Landing and Pierce Park (currently
undeveloped).
Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be annexed to the Willamalane Park
and Recreation District consistent with City policy, if the City Council determines that annexation to the special
district is in the best interest of the City.
Library Services — Upon annexation to the City of Springfield, the residents and property owners of 2576 16`h
Street will be able to obtain a free library card from the Springfield Public Library. Staff advises that early
"City" status was already granted to the residents of 2576 16`h Street for the purpose of obtaining a Library
card.
Schools — Springfield School District serves the north Springfield area. Existing schools — Yolanda
Elementary, Briggs Middle, and Springfield High School serve the neighborhood, including the subject
annexation area.
Sanitary Sewer — The annexation area can be served by extension of a public sanitary sewer line from the
Legacy Estates subdivision north of the subject property. Because of the potential health hazard of a failed
septic system, the sanitary sewer connection has already been installed to serve the residential dwelling. A Y-
connection and an 8 -inch sanitary sewer lateral were installed to provide sewer service to the subject property
and also to afford connections for the intervening dwellings (2567, 2583 and 2588 16t' Street), should these
properties annex in the future.
Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be annexed to the Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, if the City Council determines that annexation to the special district
is in the best interest of the City.
Stormwater — The subject annexation territory is served by existing catch basins and public stormwater lines
within 16th Street to the north and south of the site. The existing public stormwater system is adequate to serve
the development area, and there are no planned changes to the stormwater management system associated with
this annexation request.
Streets — The subject annexation area includes a segment of local street that is currently improved with a paved
surface, curb and gutter. The portion of 16'h Street requested for annexation represents the public street
ATTACHMENT 1 -5
Exhibit D - 6
frontage for three intervening properties (municipally addressed as 2567, 2583 and 2588 16" Street). These
properties will have contiguity to the City limits upon annexation of the subject territory. However, there are
no planned or required street improvements associated with this annexation request.
Solid Waste Management — The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for residential
garbage service inside the City limits. Upon annexation, solid waste disposal service can be provided by
Sanipac.
Communication Facilities — Various providers offer both wired and wireless communication services in the
Eugene - Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the market have the capability to
provide service to this area.
Land Use Controls — The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary.
Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the City already
has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The City will continue to administer land use controls
after annexation.
Finding: The minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined on page V -3 of the Metro Plan, are
either immediately available or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. The property
owners have obtained necessary City permits and installed the required sanitary sewer connection for the
existing dwelling.
Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion.
D. Where applicable fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an Annexation Agreement
or other mechanism approved by the City Council.
Finding: The residential lot requested for annexation is within a mature neighborhood with a full range of
utilities excepting sanitary sewer. The property owners have installed the necessary sanitary sewer connection
to serve the existing dwelling, and there are no other required infrastructure improvements. Therefore, an
Annexation Agreement is not required for this request.
Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion
DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Approve the annexation of the subject territory to City of
Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, and Willamalane Park and
Recreation District, and withdraw the requested annexation area from the Rainbow Water and Fire
District.
City Council Decision (SDC 5.7 -145): City Council approval of the annexation application shall be by
Ordinance.
Finding: On November 5, 2012, the City Council held a Public Hearing for the subject annexation request and
gave first reading to the Annexation Ordinance. No one submitted testimony for or against the annexation at
the public hearing. Based on the staff analysis and recommendation, and on the absence of testimony provided
at the Public Hearing, the City Council may take action to approve, modify or deny the Annexation Ordinance.
Zoning (SDC 5.7 -150): The annexation area is within a region of north Springfield designated as Low Density
Residential (LDR) in the Metro Plan. The current zoning for contiguous properties is LDR with Urbanizable
Fringe Overlay District (LDR/UF -10). The contiguous property to the north of the annexation territory is zoned
LDR and lies inside the City limits.
ATTACHMENT 1 -6
Exhibit D - 7
Finding: Upon the effective date of the annexation, the OF -10 overlay will be automatically removed and the
subject territory will retain the LDR zoning, which is consistent with the Metro Plan designation.
Effective Date and Notice of Approved Annexation (SDC 5.7 -155): If the annexation is granted a second
reading and approved by the City Council on November 19, 2012, the Ordinance will become effective 30 days
after adoption by the City Council and execution by the Mayor (anticipated on or around December 20, 2012),
or upon acknowledgement of filing with the Secretary of State — whichever date is later.
Withdrawal from Special Service Districts (SDC 5.7 -160): Withdrawal from special districts may occur
concurrently with the approved annexation Ordinance or after the effective date of the annexation of territory to
the City. The Director shall recommend to the City Council for consideration of the withdrawal of the annexed
territory from special districts as specified in ORS 222. In determining whether to withdraw the territory, the
City Council shall determine whether the withdrawal is in the best interest of the City. Notice of the
withdrawal shall be provided in the same manner as the annexation notice in Section 5.7 -150.
Finding: The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. Consistent with SDC 5.7 -160,
notice was provided, a public hearing was held, and the City Council determined that withdrawal from the
Rainbow Water and Fire District was in the best interest of the City. The withdrawal decision was codified in
Ordinance No.
Exhibit:
A. Assessor's Map showing property requested for annexation (redlined) and numbered survey courses
contained in legal description
ATTACHMENT 1 -7
X
W
F�1
�Q
1N
G
N�
N
n
C
U CD
wc�
J
r
w
V�
z
iaW
z:.
W a
O r W
EXHIBIT A
v vuVVUVO(:
U
a
y�
ea ro
I
m
2
W
2
U
H
Q
Exhibit D - 9
Legal Description
A portion of the 16th Street right of way and Lot 4, Block 4 of the plat of FIRST ADDITION TO
DELROSE ADDITION, as filed for public record in the Office of the Lane County, Oregon Surveyor,
in Book 50, Page 22, on January 18, 1967; being more completely described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 4 of the plat of LEGACY ESTATES, as filed for public
record in the Office of the Lane County, Oregon Surveyor, in County Surveyor's File No. 40689, on
September 14,2007; thence on the following eight (8) numbered courses:
1) North 89° 42' 35" West a distance of 55.00 feet, more or less, on the Southerly line of LEGACY
ESTATES, and its Westerly extension, said line also being the Northerly line of FIRST
ADDITION TO DELROSE ADDITION, to a point on the West right of way line of 16'h Street;
thence
2) on the West right of way of 16th Street, South 00° 00' 00" East a distance of 73.61 feet to the
Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 4, FIRST ADDITION TO DELROSE ADDITION; thence
3) leaving the West right of way line of 16th Street, on the North line of said Lot 4, Block 4, North 90°
00' 00" West a distance of 118.27 feet; thence
4) on the West line of said Lot 4, Block 4, South 00° 12' 30" West a distance of 74.00 feet; thence
5) on the South line of said Lot 4, Block 4, South 90° 00' 00" East a distance of 118.54 feet to a point
on the West right of way line of 16th Street; thence
6) continuing South 90° 00' 00" East a distance of 60.00 feet to a point on the East right of way line
of 16th Street; thence
7) on the East right of way line of 160' Street, North 00° 00' 00" West a distance of 147.61 feet, more
or less, to a point on the South line of Lot 4, LEGACY ESTATES; thence
8) on the South line of Lot 4, LEGACY ESTATES, North 89° 42' 35" West a distance of 5.00 feet,
more or less, to the point of beginning.
Basis of bearing for this description is the plat of FIRST ADDITION TO DELROSE ADDITION.
ATTACHMENT 1 -9